Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutProtected Tree Report for SFR/new 2014 Protected Tree Report: Tree Survey, Encroachment, Protection and Mitigation 2536 S. 4th Avenue Arcadia, CA 91006 Prepared For: Mr. Robert Tong Sanyao International, Inc. 255 E. Santa Clara Street, #200 Arcadia CA 91006 Tel: (626) 446-8048 Fax: (626) 446-7090 Email: Sanyao888 @aol.com Prepared By: Michael Crane Arbor Care, Inc. P.O. Box 51122 Pasadena, CA 91115 Tel: (626) 737-4007 Fax: (626) 737-4007 Email: info @arborcareinc.net March 2014 r.. Table of Contents Summary of Data 1 Background and Purpose of Report 1 Project Location, Description& Tree Ordinance 2 Observations &Analysis 4 Tree Characteristics&Health Matrix 5 Construction Impact Matrix 6 Findings 7 Further Recommendations. . 7 Appendix A- Photos 8 Appendix B -Protected Tree Construction Impact Guidelines 10 Author's Certifications 16 Certification of Performance 17 Topographic Site Plan Pocket at back Protected Tree Report: Survey Encroachment and Protection Plan 2536 S.4th Ave.,Arcadia,91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440.March 2014 SUMMARY OF DATA Total number of live Protected Trees on property including street trees located in the adjacent public right-of-way area 3 Total number of off-site Protected Trees with canopies(driplines) encroaching onto the property 0 Total number of dead or nearly dead Protected Trees on site 0 Total number of live Protected Trees to be preserved 3 Total number of live Protected Trees to be removed 0 Total number of Protected Trees to be relocated to on-site locations 0 Total number of Protected Trees to be impacted by construction within dripline (encroached) 3 Total number of live Protected Trees with no dripline encroachments 0 Total number of proposed mitigation trees to be planted on site 0 BACKGROUND & PURPOSE I was retained by the Project Manager, Mr. Robert Tong of Sanyao International, Inc. to be the consulting arborist for the planned redevelopment of the property located at 2536 S. 4th Ave., Arcadia. There are Protected Trees located in the public right-of-way adjacent to the property. The proposed construction may impact these trees and this report will serve to both notify the City of Arcadia Planning Division of the extent of the potential impacts as well as to inform the builder of the proper protection measures which must be taken in order to preserve the trees. As part of my preparation for this report I made a site visit to the property on March 4th 2014. I met with Mr. Tong at that time to view and discuss the proposed construction plans as they relate to the preservation of the Protected Trees. 1 m Protected Tree Report: Survey Encroachment and Protection Plan 2536 S.4th Ave.,Arcadia,91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440.March 2014 PROJECT LOCATION, DESCRIPTION & TREE ORDINANCE al co era r Q Ave 4 w Zi Ave na Ka ia Fed ]a .p '° ' #' gt E Camino Reel Avo c. ' CD 0 A E N+r?tvo'1 Ave C3 Ct Aster Ave . "Ili g M E Lung ►Ave :, Mayrflow1 m m , illage?c:` 9.. m e. Oak Ae N Sa ir Q, The property is approximately six blocks east of S. Santa Anita Ave.,just north of E. Live Oak Ave. Above map courtesy of Mapquest.com. The property consists of a one story single-family residence that appears to be in fair condition. The home will be demolished and the property redeveloped into a two story single family home. The landscape is maintained and is in fair condition. The trees on the property, including the Protected Trees appear to be in good health and structural conditions. The landscape will be renovated and the Protected Trees will be incorporated into the new design,with cultural improvements that will benefit the health of the Protected Oak Trees. 2 Protected Tree Report: Survey Encroachment and Protection Plan 2536 S.4th Ave.,Arcadia,91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440.March 2014 1 .° N-- 47fii7" .'7::"14:-0*,:, , ii. • _ 2 ,,.. . Y,,s fill`` , i iii 3 ..., . . .3....„ ... .., .. , ,-.4 ,,, , _ , , . ..,,,,,, , ,, . Ts N * ' r This aerial view (courtesy of Apple Maps) has been illustrated to show the approximate boundary lines (orange). The locations of the Protected Trees are numbered in yellow. City of Arcadia Tree Ordinance 44, On January 21, 1992 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1962 recognizing oak trees as significant aesthetic and ecological resources and establishing criteria for the preservation of oak trees. The regulations(Chapter 7 of the Arcadia Municipal Code)provide that the following oak trees shall not be removed,relocated, damaged, or have their protected zones encroached upon unless an Oak Tree Permit is granted: • Engelmann Oaks (Quercus engelmannii) or Coast Live Oak, California Live Oak (Quercus agrifolia)which have a trunk diameter larger than four(4) inches measured at a point four and one half(4 1/2)feet above the crown root, or, two (2) or more trunks measuring three (3) inches each or greater in diameter, measured at a point four and one half(4 1/2)feet above the crown root. 3 Protected Tree Report: Survey Encroachment and Protection Plan 2536 S.4`h Ave.,Arcadia,91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440.March 2014 • Any other living oak tree with a trunk diameter larger than twelve (12) inches measured at a point four and one half(4 1/2) feet above the crown root, or,two (2) or more trunks measuring ten(10) inches each or greater in diameter measured at a point four and one half(4 1/2)feet above the crown root. FIELD OBSERVATIONS & DESIGN ANALYSIS Refer to Site Plan located in pocket at back of this report,Tree Characteristics and Health Matrix on page 5, Construction Impacts Matrix on page 6 and Photos in Appendix A, page 8. Analysis regarding rootzone impacts are based on the type of impact, e.g, soil compaction, grading, and excavation; as well as the distance from the trunk that the impacts will occur. It is commonly accepted among professional arborists that a distance equal to three times a trunks diameter contains the structural roots responsible for keeping the tree upright. This critical rootzone area is defined as the root plate. Beyond the root plate the roots typically taper off into smaller, less significant sizes. These smaller roots are usually two inches in diameter or smaller and make up the rootmass responsible for water and nutrient uptake. Although roots of these sizes can be cut without significantly impacting health and stability it is advised that no more than 30 percent of the rootmass within the dripline is severed. The bulk of the rootmass is located within the top three feet of soil and root growth slows or halts when soil bulk density exceeds 1.60 g/cm3 for most soils. More information regarding rootzone impacts is provided in the Excavation and Root Pruning section of the Construction Impact Guidelines, Appendix B. Tree#1—24" holly oak: This street tree is located in the public right-of-way setback area of the front yard. An existing driveway located on the north side of the trunk will be removed and replaced within nearly the same footprint. The new driveway will be constructed with interlocking paving stones. The driveway will come to within ten feet from the trunk, which is five feet closer than the existing one. Some shallow grading will occur on the south side,ten feet from the trunk,to install a walkway built with concrete squares poured in place. Two foot square pilasters will be installed ten feet from the trunk as part of a front yard fence. Holly oak is a non-native oak species that performs fairly well as a lawn tree. Nevertheless,the existing turf surrounding the tree will be removed and a planter area with drip irrigation and drought resistant shrubs will be defined within 15 feet of the trunk. No pruning of the live crown is required to complete the project. Tree#2—20" holly oak: This street tree is located in the public right-of-way setback area of the front yard. Some shallow grading will occur on the north side, ten feet from the trunk,to install a walkway built with concrete squares poured in place. The existing turf surrounding the tree will be removed and a planter area with drip irrigation and drought resistant shrubs will be defined within 15 feet of the trunk. No pruning of the live crown is required to complete the project. Tree#3—36"western sycamore: This street tree is located in the public right-of-way setback area of the front yard. A two foot square concrete pilaster will be installed ten feet from the trunk. 4 a w N — TREE NUMBER O c� to w. 5 0 Q. - to O o � � co - C� CDo w t. N� TRUNK DIAMETER a o■ o (INCHES) n „, . , a` v„ • , ,a, APPROXIMATE HEIGHT itc4 0 0 0 0 (FEET) co o w AVERAGE SPREAD o vv, v.,, (FEET) 0 Q X X SYMMETRIC �. cD X ASYMMETRIC o DOMINANT m a >C X X CO-DOMINANT o o VI 0 COI H v, SUPPRESED y g i. o A YOUNG �a X X X MATURE Mt OVERMATURE .. el- .0 x x X NORMAL b o ro on SPARSE 0' a DISEASE OR INSECT x ¢. 0V- p.. co DAMAGE PRESENT a p c X X X AVERAGE 4 to" ` x G POOR H- IX, rrj TWIG DIEBACK o 2 to c X X X NORMAL H AD POOR ` ' 4 o b WOOD DECAY r X X X GOOD °_ N POOR 8 P ROOT/OTHER ROT 4 A W N — TREE NUMBER e. c. l fig '° ' o cA ,-t A) ti tri 0 CD CD o 0 w t. C g o o", o TRUNK DIAMETER(DBH) O O 0 CD C:6 4 a. ' -'— r CD CD oo oo 00 CONDITION p R° H w Z p`J Sides of tree where excavation n 5 0 g: Z (six inches or deeper) will occur 0.._3 co 54 CD 0 Sides where excavation impacts are Q Q. a z buffered by existing infrastructure 0 0 ch III O 1.-4 0 o 4 N r, IExcavation will remain a distance zO 5 of at least 3 X DBH from trunk III T, n o 0 y of Removal or Relocation '-'3 V) > et) a Additional light grading less than ►-3 g .< .< .-< 6" deep to occur within dripline d 0 A c; � a:Estimated % of total root mass °c F vi 0 0 o to be removed or severed ta. a 5 . . � `►� Aj = N D 5. n nWg C ,... 0 g p' III Pruning not to exceed 10% 5 CD 0 III a OPcJ xi CD PC Number of cuts larger than 3" N -, rti 0 0 o in diameter required z 8 g O A* a a a Diameter of cuts for branch removals O Protected Tree Report: Survey Encroachment and Protection Plan 2536 S.4th Ave.,Arcadia,91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440.March 2014 FINDINGS As with many construction projects, soil compaction is the most preventable impact that will need to be monitored in order to provide reliable protection and long-term preservation of the trees. To prevent unnecessary soil compaction a protective fence must be installed around the Protected Trees before any demolition occurs. The goal is to enclose the largest possible amount of space underneath the tree so that the heavy equipment required for demolition and construction can be routed away from root zones. The recommended fence placements are drawn in dashed lines on the Site Plan of this report. The main haul route for the demolition phase and into most of the construction phase shall be the existing driveway. The removal of the hardscape and existing turfgrass near the Protected Trees shall be done by hand. No rototilling or other deep cultivation or grading shall occur within the driplines. The existing driveway surface located within the driplines shall remain in place up until the time that the new driveway is built. The existing pavement will function as a protection against unnecessary soil compaction from vehicle and equipment traffic. Refer to the Construction Impact Guidelines in Appendix B for important general preservation measures concerning the different elements of this project. FURTHER RECOMMENDATIONS • Prior to demolition the contractor and consulting arborist shall meet on site to make sure fences are properly placed and installed and to review the goals for the tree protection plan. The location of the protective fences are drawn with a dashed line on the Site Plan included in this report. • Tree Protection Zone fences shall be at least four feet tall and constructed of chain link fencing secured on metal posts. • The fenced protection zones may be altered during construction; however, any alterations of the fenced protection zones must be approved by the arborist of record. • Maintain the fences throughout the completion of the project. No staging of materials or equipment or washing-out is to occur within the fenced protected zones. • If any injury whatsoever should occur to any Protected or preserved tree, call the consulting arborist immediately. Timeliness is critical to being able to provide the best mitigation treatment for injuries. 7 Protected Tree Report: Survey Encroachment and Protection Plan 2536 S.4th Ave.,Arcadia,91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440.March 2014 APPENDIX A—Photos ids , .� ... `.. .i. : +. .; I. r.,F ,b.r�l t <, { . I 3 ° j�f ,..„..„...,117., ,. ., „te...-..,:,: . , _, , . , . . . .. „ 44. , 4(`L� e4 �Isa '1, ,,. ..., . . 1 'REAR '"�I I . . ABOVE: Looking south at the three Protected Trees. BELOW: Looking north. _ t , i r -p• .tv T04 aA '' f = 8 , Protected Tree Report: Survey Encroachment and Protection Plan 2536 S.4th Ave.,Arcadia,91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440.March 2014 ,,,, • , - 4. r '',-; • .. .4.. ..- .. , , , ',,'N'416 4$I .';' ,f 1 fl` ,,,,,,P, • .%,"' - a . k I,,.■ail:4 , 1 ABOVE: The new driveway will be widened five feet towards the tree but will be surfaced with interlocking pavers. BELOW: A walkway made with stepping stones will be installed equidistantly between Trees #1 and #2 v ., A -- ,t... 4" . 4,■.1141 ■ . • ,, ... , i .1* Pie R• ' • ,,, 10 t' '',..f6141&. -' ,, e- -,5' ; r ' , 4;., .' 4 • • . '14:,7*,' ° * 1 " . 4'4' --. ...;‘ ','' >, ,4.- 1,:;" .:„, 4"-1 ' -..;'•., -, te .* ..: '. ' °N,. t' '4... •.:. a■..,,,,,, 47. 4,11,ei' 4:*+‘*1 '; "i;14'. ,•'''S‘t ' 'a.P. 4'-;4'. '1010 A .. 8 ■ 4' • s . , *4 '"- ,•', . 1., ,. , • ,,, ' A 9 k, Protected Tree Report: Survey Encroachment and Protection Plan 2536 S.4th Ave.,Arcadia,91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440.March 2014 APPENDIX B - Protected Tree Construction Impact Guidelines Size and Distribution of Tree Roots—Taken from Arboriculture, Integrated Management of Landscape Trees Shrubs and Vines. Harris, R.W., Clark, J.W., Matheny N.P. Prentice Hall 2004. Roots of most plants, including large trees, grow primarily in the top meter(3 ft) of soil (see figure below). Most plants concentrate the majority of their small absorbing roots in the upper 150 mm(6 in.) of soil if the surface is protected by a mulch or forest litter. In the absence of a protective mulch, exposed bare soil can become so hot near the surface that roots do not grow in the upper 200 to 250 mm(8 to 10 in.). Under forest and many landscape situations, however, soil near the surface is most favorable for root growth. In addition, roots tend to grow at about the same soil depth regardless of the slope of the soil surface. Although root growth is greatly influenced by soil conditions, individual roots seem to have an inherent guidance mechanism. Large roots with vigorous tips usually grow horizontally. Similar roots lateral to the large roots grow at many angles to the vertical, and some grow up into the surface soil. However, few roots in a root system actually grow down. ik: 10? _ Y � ' 411\1 Depth In It Depth In meters 2 = 0,5 3 I.0 s 1.5 FIGURE In mature trees,the taproot is either lost or reduced in size.The vast majority of the root system is composed of horizon4alty oriented lateral roots. 10 Protected Tree Report: Survey Encroachment and Protection Plan 2536 S.4th Ave.,Arcadia,91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440.March 2014 The importance of soil Soil supports and anchors tree roots and provides water, minerals and oxygen. Furthermore, soil is a habitat for soil microorganisms that enhance root function. A soil's ability to sustain tree growth is largely determined by its texture, structure (bulk density), organic matter, water and mineral content, salinity, aeration, and soil-microbe abundance and diversity. Soil physical properties Soil texture—the relative proportion of sand, silt and clay, is important because it affects water—and nutrient-holding capacity, drainage and aeration(gaseous diffusion). Soil structure is the arrangement of individual soil particles into clumps (aggregates). The net result is the formulation of larger voids between the aggregates which serve as channels for gaseous diffusion,movement of water and root penetration. Unfortunately, soil aggregates are readily destroyed by activities that compact the soil (increase bulk density). When this occurs, gaseous exchange,permeability, drainage and root growth are restricted. The influence of the organic matter content of soil properties is quiet significant. Its decomposition by soil organisms releases substances that bind soil particles into larger granules, which improves both soil aeration, and drainage. In essence,the breakdown of organic matter improves water—and nutrient-holding capacity and reduces bulk density. Furthermore, it is the primary source of nitrogen and a major source of nitrogen and a major source of phosphorus and sulfur. Without organic matter soil organisms could not survive and most biochemical processes in the soil would cease. Soil aeration,the movement and the availability of oxygen, is determined by both soil texture and structure. In general, compacted and finer soils, due to a higher proportion of small pore spaces (micropores), tend to drain slowly and hold less air than coarser, sandy, or well-structured find soils. Water retained in the small pores displaces oxygen and inhibits gaseous diffusion. The availability of soil water is largely determined by the size of the pore spaces between the soil particles and the larger aggregates in which water is held. Most of the water in the larger pore spaces drains readily due to gravitational forces. A relatively thin film of water,which is readily available to plant roots,remains following drainage. Much of water held within the smaller pore spaces resists uptake by plant roots because it is held tightly on the soil surfaces. Plant roots require an adequate supply of oxygen for development. Injury or dysfunction results when oxygen availability drops below a critical level. Root respiration is the first process to be restricted, followed by disruptions in growth, metabolism, nutrient and water uptake, and photosynthesis. Furthermore,the accumulation of high levels of carbon dioxide,produced by the roots during respiration can also impair root function. Reduced soil aeration resulting from soil compaction, flooding, excess irrigation, or 11 Ith Protected Tree Report: Survey Encroachment and Protection Plan 2536 S.4`h Ave.,Arcadia,91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440.March 2014 impervious pavement favors the development of crown rot(Phytophthora root disease). It also inhibits mycorrhizal fungi that enhance water and nutrient uptake and resist root pathogens. The forest floor under a canopy in most undeveloped forests and woodland settings is typically covered by a layer of fallen leaves and other woody debris. It is usually cool, shady, well-aerated, and relatively moist—conditions that favor normal root growth. When the natural leaf litter is removed and when a tree's lower canopy is pruned up to provide clearance,the absorbing roots in the upper few inches of the soil experience higher soil temperatures and increased desiccation due to direct exposure to sunlight. Minimizing the Effects of Construction and Development on Tree Root Systems Activities that injure roots or adversely affect the root zone should be avoided or kept as far from the trunk as possible. Design changes or alternative building practices that avoid or minimize construction-related impacts should be considered and proposed when applicable. Soil Compaction Soils are intentionally compacted under structures, sidewalks,reads, parking areas, and load-bearing fill to prevent subsidence, and to prevent soil movement on slopes. Although unintentional, soil within the root zone of trees is often compacted by unrestricted foot traffic, parking of vehicles, operation of heavy equipment, and during installation of fill. Compaction destroys the soil's natural porosity by eliminating much of the air space contained within it. It leaves the soil hardm impenetrable and largely unfavorable for root growth. The soil's natural porosity, which allows for water movement and storage, gaseous exchange, and root penetration, is greatly reduced. Consequently,root growth and tree health suffer. Soil compaction is best managed by preventing it. Bulk density is used to describe a soil's porosity, or the amount of space between soil particles and aggregates. High bulk densities indicate a low percentage of total pore space. Pavement Paving over the root systems of trees is another serious problem because it reduces the gaseous diffusion and soil moisture. Most paving materials are relatively impervious to water penetration and typically divert water away from a tree's root zone. Cracks and expansion joints do,though, allow for some water infiltration into the soil below. Of greater concern, is the loss of roots from excavation to achieve the required grade, and the necessary compaction to prevent subsidence. Once the soil surface is compacted, a base material is then added and compacted as well. With that done,the surface can then be paved. Thus,pavement within the root zones of trees can damage roots and create 12 Protected Tree Report: Survey Encroachment and Protection Plan 2536 S.4th Ave.,Arcadia,91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440.March 2014 unfavorable soil conditions. One alternative to minimize pavement impacts is to consider placing the pavement on the natural grade over a layer of minimally compacted base material. To reduce sub-grade compaction, consider using reinforced concrete or asphalt over a goetextile blanket to help stabilize the soil. On-grade patios or paving that covers more than one-third of the tree protection zone (TPZ) should be constructed using permeable materials that allow aeration and water penetration. Soil under permeable surfaces should not be compacted to more than 80 percent. Excavation and root pruning Excavation within the root zones of trees should be avoided as much as possible. The extent of root pruning(selective)or cutting(non-selective) should be based on the species growth characteristics and adaptive traits, environmental conditions, age, health, crown size, density, live crown ration and structural condition of the tree. The timing of the root pruning or cutting is another important consideration. Moderate to severe root loss during droughts or particularly hot periods can cause serious water-deficit injury or death. When root pruning/cutting is unavoidable, roots should be pruned or cut as far from the trunk as possible. Cutting roots on more than one side of a tree should also be avoided. Root cutting extending more than half-way around a tree should generally be no closer than about 10 times the trunk diameter. Recommended distances range from as little as 6 times trunk diameter(DBH) for young trees to 12 times trunk diameter for mature trees. The size of the TPZ should,however, be increased for over mature and declining trees and species that are sensitive to root loss. The minimum distance from the trunk that roots can be cut on one side of the tree without destabilizing it, is a distance equal to about three times the diameter(DBH) of the trunk. Roots severed within that distance provide little or no structural support. Root pruning or cutting distances from the trunk should be greater for trees that lean and/or those growing on shallow or wet soil. In cases where the proposed grading will adversely affect trees designated for retention, special attention should be given to proper root pruning and post-construction care for injured trees. Where structural footings are required for foundations, retaining walls, etc., and roots larger than 2 inches in diameter will be impacted, consider design changes or alternative building methods. When excavation within 5 times trunk diameter is unavoidable,roots greater than 1 1/2 inches in diameter should be located prior to excavation and then pruned to avoid unnecessary damage. Hand-digging or use of a hydraulic or pneumatic soil excavation tool is the least disruptive way to locate roots for pruning. Although mechanical root pruners make clean cuts,they are non-selective. A backhoe bucket, dozer blade or trencher will typically pull,rip or shatter the larger root,causing additional damage toward the tree. Once the roots that interfere with the structure being built, e.g., 13 Protected Tree Report: Survey Encroachment and Protection Plan 2536 S.46 Ave.,Arcadia,91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440.March 2014 foundations, footings, retaining wall, curbs, etc., are exposed,they should then be cut perpendicular to their long axis using a hand-saw, `carbide-tipped chainsaw' or sharp ax, depending on size. Roots that are pruned in this manner typically regenerate new roots from near the cut. Roots exposed by excavation should be protected from exposure to sun and desiccation. Exposed roots that can not be covered with soil by the end of the day should be covered with moistened burlap or similar material. Roots can generally be cut in a non-selective manner when excavating near of beyond the dripline. Ripped, splintered or fractured portions of roots however, should be re-cut. The damaged portion should be removed using sharp tools. The cut should be flat across the root with the adjacent bark intact. Wound dressings should not be applied to pruned or damaged roots except when recommended for disease, insect or sprout control. The best approach to avoid water-deficit injury following root loss during the growing season is to provide ample irrigation. Irrigation should be considered prior to, during, and after root pruning. Watering schedules should also consider local soil conditions, climate,topography,time of year, species adaptability, extent of root pruning and tree health. If possible, irrigate the tree 7 to 10 days prior to excavation so that there is an adequate reservoir of soil water. Water can be delivered to large construction sites via water-tank trucks and applied directly to affected trees or stored nearby in plastic tanks. On relatively flat terrain, a 6 to 8 inch soil berm at the tree's dripline should be constructed to act as a watering basin. On steep terrain, soaker hoses should be used. They can be placed across the slope or spirally around the trunk, from about six feet away to the dripline. In addition, a two to four inch layer of wood chip mulch should be applied to as much of the root zone as possible to retard soil water loss. Pruning foliage to compensate for root loss is not supported by scientific research and likely to result in slower recovery. Fertilization to stimulate root growth is generally unwarranted and may be counterproductive. Trenching within the Tree Protection Zone Trenching for underground utilities should be routed around the TPZ. When this is unavoidable,trenching within the TPZ should be done by `hand' or using a pneumatic or hydraulic soil excavation tool, carefully working around larger roots. Roots larger than 1 % inches in diameter should not be cut. Dig below these roots to route utilities or install drains. A combination of tools can also produce satisfactory results, for example, a skillful backhoe operator under the arborist's supervision can dig down several inches at a time and detect larger roots by `feel' (resistance). At that point, as assistant can expose the root and dig around it. In this mariner,the backhoe can then continue extending the trench though the TPZ. Tunneling(boring)through the TPZ is the preferable alternative. For most large trees,tunneling depth should be at least 36 inches. Tunneling should begin at the edge of the TPZ, but no closer than a distance equal to one foot of clearance for each inch of tree DBH. Tunnels should also be offset to either side 14 Protected Tree Report: Survey Encroachment and Protection Plan 2536 S.4th Ave.,Arcadia,91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440.March 2014 of the trunk. For trenching that extends only part way into TPZ, consider trenching radially to the tree trunk, as this is less harmful than tangential trenching. All trenches made within the TPZ should be backfilled as quickly as possible to prevent root and soil desiccation. Managing Root Injured Trees Root-pruned trees should be monitored for symptoms of water-deficit injury for a specified period following root pruning. Irrigation should be considered prior to, during, and after root pruning. Irrigation schedules should consider local soil conditions, climate, topography,time of year, species tolerance, extent of root pruning and tree health. Grade Change: Fill Soil Fill soil placed within the root zones of trees can have an adverse effect, particularly if the soil is compacted to support a structure or pavement. Soil compaction reduces aeration and water infiltration. Fill soil, die to textural changes, can also prevent water from penetrating the original soil layer below where the roots are. Furthermore, soil placed against the root crown and lower trunk can lead to root disease problems, especially if the soil near the trunk remains moist during the summer from irrigation. Alternatives to placing fills over roots zones shall be considered and proposed as appropriate. 15 Protected Tree Report: Survey Encroachment and Protection Plan 2536 S.4th Ave.,Arcadia,91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440.March 2014 AUTHOR'S CURRENT CREDENTIALS L, VI g R � 1ZG4 15 4 ,� X �)�i ^ O Q 4 to a r. r �-+ a 1IiE 1 ! e y , 1r .. rLl/ t(,::::,..: t ��i pill %�%C r. ;r J fl Ctt .., ■ '•';‘,. 1 A i I r,. i . • , ,,, ,... .,, , _ ,,, ..., .,. , ,,,,, ,,. . .. ,„ , , „, ,,,_, ,,,.. z ,... , ,-....,,,-. („,,,,, = ,.. . .., •, J \ ,...1_,3 � t ) ^� ./ '.I.., .,f / `. tom/ 1.�.6i \ . T c.... • r V ' ag H W a s- c2 § I t k-- H I f T s q co rN,. V • 4.i7 a I F .: w L _ et i �,� ai err +r - v G O! ® `-� kJ y rte v O d 0 k. a . " r—'i .� ' 8 0 w f.3 1.71 V 7 ,,, •r ▪ L. U t ^ W 4: r r y =l r v °: '� (7) Q°a„ i �I NPFt F a r � V V ca c "' n Jin Z rr\ s < u_ ` ^� ao ea 10 :rL U — OQ dS aaaa 16 k. Protected Tree Report: Survey Encroachment and Protection Plan 2536 S.4th Ave.,Arcadia,91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440.March 2014 CERTIFICATION OF PERFORMANCE I,Michael Crane, certify that: • I have personally inspected the tree(s) and the property referred to in this report and have stated my findings accurately. • I have no current or prospective interest in the vegetation or the property that is the subject of this report and have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved. • The analysis, opinions, and conclusions stated herein are my own and are based on current scientific procedures and facts. • My analysis, opinions, and conclusions were developed and this report has been prepared according to commonly accepted arboricultural practices. • No one provided significant professional assistance to me, except as indicated within the report. • My compensation is not contingent upon the reporting of a predetermined conclusion that favors the cause of the client or any other party not upon the results of the assessment,the attainment of stipulated results, or the occurrence of any subsequent events. I further certify that I am a member in good standing of the American Society of Consulting Arborists and the International Society of Arboriculture. I have been involved in the field of Horticulture in a full-time capacity for a period of more than 15 years. -, ., Signed: Registered Consulting Arborist#440; American Society of Consulting Arborist Board Certified Master Arborist#WE 6643B; International Society of Arboriculture Licensed California Agricultural Pest Control Adviser#AA08269 March 5, 2014 �G� 1. C 44 Date:■. NN UlG N 0,R[WITX u n _woultiott 17