Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 1 - MC 16-17 - 914 S. 4thMC 16-17 and SSADR 16-21 October 11, 2016 Page 1 of 4 DATE: October 11, 2016 TO: Honorable Chairman and Modification Committee FROM: Lisa L. Flores, Planning Services Manager By: Vanessa Quiroz, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: MODIFICATION NO. MC 16-17 AND SINGLE-STORY ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. SS-ADR 16-21 WITH A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) TO ALLOW MODIFICATIONS TO THE REQUIRED FRONT YARD SETBACK AND SPECIAL SETBACK FOR THE EXTENSION OF A SUBSTANDARD TWO-CAR GARAGE AND A MODIFICATION TO THE SPECIAL SETBACK FOR A NEW FRONT COVERED PORCH AT 914 S. 4TH AVENUE Recommendation: Conditional Approval BACKGROUND The subject property is a 5,162 square foot, substandard interior lot, zoned R-1. It is substandard in that it does not meet the minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet for this area. The site is currently improved with a 1,035 square foot, one story, single-family residence with an attached substandard two-car garage, built in 1959 – refer to Attachment No. 1 for an Aerial photo with Zoning Information and Photos of the Subject Property and Vicinity. ANALYSIS The Applicant is proposing to extend the existing substandard two-car garage by another 10’-0” from the front of the house and maintain the same dimensions of the existing garage which is 17’-0” x 19’-1”, as measured from the interior building walls. The Applicant is also proposing to convert the remaining garage area into livable space and add a new 131 square foot front covered porch – refer to Attachment No. 2. The proposed project complies with all other applicable R-1 zoning regulations. Since more than 60% of the frontage on this block is developed with a larger front yard setback than 25’-0”, the required front yard setback for this site is 30’-0” which was based on the average of the two properties on each side of the property. Although the new garage will have a 25’-0” front yard setback, whereas 30’-0” is required, and MC 16-17 and SSADR 16-21 October 11, 2016 Page 2 of 4 encroach into the special setback of 35’-0” along Fourth Avenue, it will not change the streetscape appearance since this section of Fourth Avenue already has a variety of front yard setbacks that ranges from 25 feet to 35 feet. This is due to the mix of old and new developments and inconsistent lot sizes which made it easier for developments on larger lots to meet the special setback. The size of this lot is significantly smaller in comparison to the adjacent lot to the south and other surrounding lots and based on the development patterns of nearby homes those homes either comply with the front yard setback but not the rear yard setback, or vice versa, complies with the rear yard setback or not the front yard setback. Furthermore, the new garage will have the same front yard setback of 25’-0” as the house next door at 910 N. 4th Avenue. Therefore, in order for the applicant accommodate a reasonable expansion to the existing structure, an expansion to the front of the structure is the most logical choice without limiting an appropriate expansion to the home. As for extending the legal non- conforming garage, the image to the right, shows that the existing substandard garage has adequate space to accommodate two vehicles. The property is also served with a special setback of 65’-0” from the center line of the street and 35’-0” from the front property line. The purpose of the special setback is for future street widening purposes. The City Engineer has reviewed the plans and stated that the City is not proposing to widen this section of Fourth Avenue. As for the new front covered porch, it will extend approximately 5’-0” from the main house. However, it will only encroach into the required special setback of 35’-0”. It is staff’s opinion that the new front porch will enhance the existing front façade of the existing home and help enhance the overall appearance of the house, as shown below. MC 16-17 and SSADR 16-21 October 11, 2016 Page 3 of 4 FINDINGS Section 9292.1.4 of the Arcadia Municipal Code states that the purpose of the Modification procedures is for the following: 1. Secure an appropriate improvement of a lot; 2. Prevent an unreasonable hardship; or 3. Promote uniformity of development. The existing substandard two-car garage currently provides adequate space for two vehicles. Alternatively, the owner could add a second floor addition above the main house but it could change the overall aesthetic of the house. As previously mentioned, the garage will have the same front yard setback as the house next door which is approximately of the same lot size and dimensions. The request to extend the substandard garage and add a front covered porch will not negatively impact the streetscape of the neighborhood and will secure an appropriate and reasonable improvement of the lot as well as promote uniformity of development. The City Engineer determined that the special setback is not needed for street widening purposes. Approval of the subject modifications will secure an appropriate improvement of the lot. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The proposed project qualifies as a Class 3 and Class 5 Exemption for minor alterations to an existing structure and minor alterations in land use limitations from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Sections 15303 and 15305 of the CEQA Guidelines. Refer to Attachment No. 3 for the Preliminary Exemption Assessment. PUBLIC COMMENTS Public hearing notices were mailed on September 29, 2015 to the property owners within 100 feet of the subject site. Staff has not received any public comments on this project. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Modification Committee conditionally approve Modification Application No. MC 16-17 and Single-Story Architectural Design Review No. SSADR 16-21 and find that the project is exempt per CEQA Sections 15303 and 15305, subject to the following conditions of approval: 1. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Arcadia and its officials, officers, employees, and agents from and against any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Arcadia, its officials, officers, employees or agents to attack, set aside, void, or annul any approval or conditional approval of the City of Arcadia concerning this project and/or land use decision, including but not limited to MC 16-17 and SSADR 16-21 October 11, 2016 Page 4 of 4 any approval or conditional approval of the City Council, Planning Commission, Modification Committee, or City Staff, which action is brought within the time period provided for in Government Code Section 66499.37 or other provision of law applicable to this project or decision. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding concerning the project and/or land use decision and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense of the matter. The City reserves the right, at its own option, to choose its own attorney to represent the City, its officials, officers, employees, and agents in the defense of the matter. 2. Approval of MC 16-17 and SSADR 16-21 and shall not be of effect unless on or before 30 calendar days after approval of this project, the property owner/applicant has executed and filed with the Community Development Administrator or designee an Acceptance Form available from the Development Services Department to indicate awareness and acceptance of these conditions of approval. Attachment No. 1: Aerial Photo with Zoning Information & Photos of Subject Property and Vicinity Attachment No. 2: Architectural Plans Attachment No. 3: Preliminary Exemption Assessment Attachment No. 1 Aerial Photo with Zoning Information and Photos of Subject Property and Vicinity Attachment No. 1 Overlays Selected parcel highlighted Parcel location within City of Arcadian/a n/a n/a n/a Property Owner(s): Architectural Design Overlay: Downtown Overlay: Special Height Overlay: Parking Overlay: Lot Area (sq ft): Year Built: Main Structure / Unit (sq. ft.): General Plan: R-1 (7,500) Number of Units: LDR Zoning: Property Characteristics 1959 1,035 1 LI,THOMAS Site Address: 914 S 4TH AVE This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. Report generated29-Sep-2016 Page 1 of 1 5,162 Neighbor two houses to the north at 906 S. 4th Avenue Adjacent neighbor to the north at 910 S. 4th Avenue Subject property at 914 S. 4th Avenue Adjacent neighbor at 924 S. 4th Avenue Neighbor to the southwest across the street at 919 S. 4th Avenue Neighbor directly across the street at 911 S. 4th Avenue Neighbor to the northwest across the street at 330 E. Duarte Road Attachment No. 2 Architectural Plans Attachment No. 2 Attachment No. 3 Preliminary Exemption Assessment Attachment No. 3 Preliminary Exemption Assessment FORM “A” PRELIMINARY EXEMPTION ASSESSMENT (Certificate of Determination When Attached to Notice of Exemption) 1. Name or description of project: Modification Committee No. MC 16-17 to maintain nonconforming two-car garage and to encroach into the required special setback for street facing additions. Architectural Design Review No. SS- ADR single story additions. 2. Project Location – Identify street address and cross streets or attach a map showing project site (preferably a USGS 15’ or 7 1/2’ topographical map identified by quadrangle name): 914 S. 4th Avenue (Duarte Road and Scott Place) 3. Entity or person undertaking project: A. B. Other (Private) (1) Name Tom Li (2) Address 914 S. 4th Avenue Arcadia, CA 91006 4. Staff Determination: The Lead Agency’s Staff, having undertaken and completed a preliminary review of this project in accordance with the Lead Agency's "Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)" has concluded that this project does not require further environmental assessment because: a. The proposed action does not constitute a project under CEQA. b. The project is a Ministerial Project. c. The project is an Emergency Project. d. The project constitutes a feasibility or planning study. e. The project is categorically exempt. Applicable Exemption Class: Sections 15301 and 15305; Additions to existing structure and minor adjustments to the setbacks. f. The project is statutorily exempt. Applicable Exemption: g. The project is otherwise exempt on the following basis: h. The project involves another public agency which constitutes the Lead Agency. Name of Lead Agency: Date: September 26, 2016 Staff: Vanessa Quiroz, Assistant Planner