Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1204 Oakwood Dr. Findings & Action ReportPage 1 of 5 Arcadia Highlands Homeowner’s Association Architectural Review Board Findings and Action Report File No.: L-057-2016 Date: 11/09/2016 Project Address: 1204 Oakwood Dr. Applicant: __Robert Tong-Sanyao Intnl Inc.________ Owner (if different) ___Ash Rizk_____________________ Project Description: New build- one story single family home_ FINDINGS I. SITE PLANNING - The proposed project IS/IS NOT consistent with the Site Planning Guidelines based on all mature trees and hedge will be preserved and incorporated into new design and is visually harmonious with the site and compatible with the character and quality of the surroundings. The one story height and size is in scale and proportion with the homes around it and the wide street, corner lot, and 60’plus setback is conducive to the size of the home. II. ENTRY - The proposed project IS/IS NOT consistent with the Entry Guidelines based on: The height is in scale with the height and design of the home. The door and decorative elements are architecturally compatible with the style of the home. The roof follows the same pitch as the adjacent roofs. III. MASSING - The proposed project IS/IS NOT consistent with the Massing Guidelines based on The new building is compatible to surrounding homes. The walls facing the street are varied and articulated which reduces the overall massing. IV. SCALE - The proposed project IS/IS NOT consistent with the Scale Guidelines based The scale of the one story home on a corner lot with wide streets is in proportion to the lot and homes surrounding it. Page 2 of 5 V. ROOFS - The proposed project IS/IS NOT consistent with the Roofing Guidelines based on The roof plan and material (concrete tiles resembling slate) are compatible with the Highlands requirements and the architectural style and design of the home. It reflects a traditional roof form and enhances the house’s plan articulation by reflecting it in three dimensions. VI. FACADE DESIGN - The proposed project IS/IS NOT consistent with the Facade Design The use of natural stone, stucco and 3”thick wood shutters reflect the home’s architectural style and is carried throughout the house and garage structure. VII. DETAILS - The proposed project IS/IS NOT consistent with the Guidelines for Architectural The porch columns, lighting, use of natural stone, placement of wood shutters and use of aluminum clad windows with simulated divided light are consistent with the architectural style of the home and add architectural interest. The placement of these elements are in proportion and scale to the home’s appearance and add visual interest. VIII. MATERIALS & COLORS – The proposed project IS / IS NOT consistent with the Guidelines All the materials and colors are natural and suit the architectural style of the home and ties the new structure in to its surroundings. It is a balanced color palette and the use natural stone and dark color on the shutters and doors add to the overall look of the home which makes it pleasing to the eye. IX. LANDSCAPE & HARDSCAPE - The proposed project IS/IS NOT consistent with the Guidelines for Landscape and Hardscape based on existing mature trees and hedge will remain and worked in to the new landscape design that enhances the home’s appearance. There is a good balance between than hard and soft scape. X. FENCES & WALLS - The proposed project IS/IS NOT consistent with the Guidelines for Fences and Walls based on the existing will remain in the rear and added walls of side street facing yard is largely unseen as it will be built inside the existing mature hedge. The size and design of wall seen from street as it approaches the garage side of this corner lot is curved and retains a line of sight to the driveway. The wall is appropriate to the design and plan of the home for yard enclosure and sound reduction from the street. XI. ARCHITECTURAL STYLE - The proposed project IS/IS NOT consistent with the Guidelines for Architectural Style based on it is traditional/provincial type design and there are a mix of architectural styles on all sides of this home. Page 3 of 5 XII. ADDITIONS & ALTERATIONS - The proposed project IS/IS NOT consistent with the Guidelines for Additions and Alterations based: N/A XIII. STREETSCAPE - The proposed project IS/IS NOT consistent with the Streetscape and Front of Dwelling Guidelines based on the fact that the new design is harmonious with new home’s design and is an improvement over the existing home. XIV. MINIMUM FLOOR AREA & SETBACKS - The proposed project IS/IS NOT consistent with the Minimum Floor Area and Setback Guidelines based on the design meets current code. XV. GARAGES - The proposed project IS/IS NOT consistent with the Guidelines for Garages based on its location and meets code requirements for 5 bedroom home. It does not dominate the front elevation as it is a side street entry due to its location on a corner lot. The style and color of the doors are harmonious and compatible with the home. XVI. EXTERIOR BUILDING MATERIALS & APPEARANCE - The proposed project IS/IS NOT consistent with the Exterior Building Materials and Appearance Guidelines based on its use on natural materials. XVII. AFFECT ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES & NEIGHBORHOOD - The proposed project IS/IS NOT consistent with the Guidelines for Affect on Adjacent Properties and the Neighborhood based on there is minimal impact on neighbors. It’s a single story and the overall height is appropriate to the lot setback and streetscape and will not negatively impact or change neighboring views. Page 4 of 5 ACTION ___ Approved/ __X_ Conditionally Approved/ ____ Denied Conditions of Approval : A window sample be provided for approval prior to signing the plans. These Findings and Action were made by the following ARB Members of the Association at a meeting held on Nov. 9 at 1204 Oakwood Dr. Members In Attendance-Vote: Suzanne Ligon-yes Signature: ________________________________ David Arvisu-yes Suzanne Ligon, ARB Chair Gina Truex-yes Jon Conrad-yes Lee Kuo-yes EXPIRATION - If for a period of one (1) year from the date of approval, any project for which plans have been approved by the ARB, has not begun construction (as evidenced by clearing and grading and/or/the installation of a new foundation and/or by installation of new materials on a structure that is being remodeled) or has been unused, abandoned or discontinued, said approval shall become null and void and of no effect. Such project may be resubmitted to the ARB for renewed approval; however, the ARB shall review the project as if it had not been previously approved in accordance with the current standards in effect. APPEALS - Appeals from the ARB shall be made to the Planning Commission. Planning Commission decisions on ARB cases may be appealed to the City Council. Said appeals shall be made in writing and delivered to Planning Services within seven (7) calendar days of the ARB's decision and shall be accompanied by an appeal fee in accordance with the applicable fee schedule adopted by resolution of the City Council. Upon receipt of an appeal in proper form, such appeal shall be processed by Planning Services in accordance with the same procedures applicable to appeals from the Modification Committee, except that noticing shall be consistent with ARB noticing. Page 5 of 5