HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 2 - TPM 17-03 (74609) 30 Fano StreetDATE: July 11, 2017
TO: Honorable Chairman and Planning Commission
FROM: Lisa L. Flores, Planning Services Manager
By: Jordan Chamberlin, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 1998 – APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO.
TPM 17-03 (74609) AND MULTIPLE FAMILY ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN
REVIEW NO. MFADR 17-02 WITH A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION
UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA)
FOR A THREE UNIT RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT
AT 30 FANO STREET
Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 1998
SUMMARY
The applicant, Robert Tong of Sanyao International Inc., is requesting approval of
Tentative Parcel Map No. TPM 17-03 (74609) and Multiple Family Architectural Design
Review No. MFADR 17-02, for a three unit, residential condominium development at 30
Fano Street. The proposed development and subdivision are consistent with the City’s
General Plan, Development Code, and Subdivision Code. As an infill development
project, the proposed development qualifies for a Categorical Exemption under the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as discussed later in the staff report. It is
recommended that the Planning Commission approve TPM 17-03 (74609) and MFADR
17-02, subject to the conditions listed in this staff report, and adopt Resolution No. 1998
– see Attachment No. 1.
BACKGROUND
The subject property is an 8,001 square foot lot zoned R-3, High Density Multiple Family
Residential. The site is currently developed with three multiple family residences. One
unit is located in a detached single story building along Fano Street. The other two units
are located on the upper level of a two story building located along the rear property
line. In addition, four individual garage parking spaces are located on the ground level of
this building. The building adjacent to Fano Street was constructed in 1938 and is 893
square feet of living space. The building to the rear was constructed in 1953 – see
Attachment No. 2 for an Aerial photo with Zoning Information and Photos of the Subject
Property and Vicinity.
The Certificate of Demolition for the subject property was approved on October 19,
2016 – see Attachment No. 3 for the Historical Report. Based on the evaluation by an
Architectural Historian, the property does not meet any of the minimum requirements for
Resolution No. 1998 – TPM 17-03 (74609) & MFADR 17-02
30 Fano Street
July 11, 2017 – Page 2 of 9
recognition as a historical resource nor is it eligible for listing on the California Register
because the residences are not the work of a master architect, nor are they an
important example of Minimalist architecture, or associated with any significant events
or persons.
PROPOSAL
The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing structures and construct a three unit
residential condominium development with surface parking - see Attachment No. 4 for
the Tentative Parcel Map and Attachment No. 5 for the Proposed Architectural Plans.
The proposed development consists of two, two story, French Country style, townhome
buildings. Unit 1 is accessed from a pedestrian walkway from Fano Street. Units 2 and 3
can be accessed from a pedestrian walkway along the easterly property line. Direct
access to each unit is also provided from the associated attached garages.
Each unit consists of three bedrooms, two and a half bathrooms, and approximately
1,500 square feet of living area. A total of six garage parking spaces for residents and
two guest parking spaces will be provided, which meets the required parking per the
Development Code.
The new residences will have an overall building height of 25’-6”, where a maximum of
30’-0” is allowed. The building will be set back 25’-0” from the front property line, which
complies with the required 25’-0” front yard setback for the R-3 zone. All other Zoning
Code requirements will be satisfied by the proposed design.
ANALYSIS
The R-3 zone has a minimum density of one dwelling unit per 2,200 square feet of lot
area, and a maximum density of one unit per 1,450 square feet of lot area. This
calculates to a minimum of three units and a maximum of five units for the subject
property. The proposed three unit development is in compliance with the density
requirements.
Concurrent with the subdivision application, the Planning Commission is to approve,
conditionally approve, or deny the architectural design of the proposed project. The
architectural style of the development is described as French Country – see Attachment
No. 5. The proposed development is a well thought-out design. The exterior of the
Figure 1. Proposed Site Plan
Resolution No. 1998 – TPM 17-03 (74609) & MFADR 17-02
30 Fano Street
July 11, 2017 – Page 3 of 9
buildings includes light beige colored stucco, tan vinyl framed windows, and multi-
dimensional charcoal colored concrete tile roofing.
Thoughtfully placed gabled roof features, dark brown raised panel shutters, architectural
projections and decorative corbels emphasize the French Country style. Pedestrian
walkways provide good connectivity among the units and to the street. The front
entrance of each residential unit is oriented towards a pedestrian walkway which is in
keeping with the City’s Design Guidelines and the goals and policies of the Arcadia
General Plan. Each unit will have ample private open space in the form of patios.
Landscaping is provided along the rear and side property lines to help soften the
appearance of the development from neighboring properties.
The proposed development will be consistent with the City’s General Plan, Multiple -
Family Residential Design Guidelines, Development and Subdivision Codes, and the
State Subdivision Map Act. The proposed plans have been reviewed by the various City
Departments, and all City requirements shall be complied with to the satisfaction of the
Building Official, City Engineer, Development Services Director, Fire Marshal, and
Public Works Services Director, or their respective designees.
FINDINGS
Tentative Parcel Map
The proposal for three residential condominium units requires that they be subdivided
through the Tentative Parcel Map process – see Attachment No. 4 for the Tentative
Parcel Map No. 17-03 (74609). The proposed subdivision complies with the subdivision
regulations of the Arcadia Municipal Code and the State Subdivision Map Act, and will
not violate any requirements of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board.
The following findings are required for approval of a Tentative Parcel Map:
Figure 2. Proposed front elevation
Resolution No. 1998 – TPM 17-03 (74609) & MFADR 17-02
30 Fano Street
July 11, 2017 – Page 4 of 9
A. The proposed map, subdivision design, and improvements are consistent
with the General Plan, any applicable specific plan, and the Subdivisions
Division of the Development Code.
The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the
General Plan as the site is physically suitable for the type of development and
the approval of the architectural design for the condominiums respects the scale
and character of the existing neighborhood.
B. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of
development.
The site is physically suitable for the density of the project and complies with t he
minimum density of three units, and the maximum density of five units. There are
no physical impediments to the development of this site for residential
condominiums.
C. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not
likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and
avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
The proposed Tentative Parcel Map is for a minor subdivision of an infill site and
there is no protected aquatic or wildlife habitat on the subject pr operty. Therefore,
it will not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably
injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
D. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements is not likely to
cause serious public health or safety problems.
The proposed subdivision is for condominium purposes. No portion of the land
will be physically subdivided. The construction of the three, multiple family
residential units are being done in compliance with Building and Fire Codes and
all other applicable regulations. The Project meets all health and safety
requirements, and will not cause any public health or safety problems.
E. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict
with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use
of, property within the proposed subdivision (This finding shall apply only
to easements of record or to easements established by judgement of a
court of competent jurisdiction and no authority is hereby granted to a
legislative body to determine that the public at large has acquired
easements for access through or use of property within the proposed
subdivision).
The proposed design of the subdivision or the type of improvements does not
conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large for access through or
use of, property within the proposed subdivision. Based on the tentative parcel
map, there are no such easements on the subject property.
Resolution No. 1998 – TPM 17-03 (74609) & MFADR 17-02
30 Fano Street
July 11, 2017 – Page 5 of 9
F. The discharge of sewage from the proposed subdivision into the
community sewer system will not result in violation of existing
requirements specified by the California Regional Water Quality Control
Board.
The Arcadia Public Works Services Department determined that the City’s
existing infrastructure will adequately serve the new development, and the
requirements of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board will be
satisfied.
G. The design of the subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, passive or
natural heating and cooling opportunities.
The Project has been designed to comply with the California Building Code that
includes regulations pertaining to energy conservation.
H. The proposed subdivision, its design, density, and type of development
and improvements conforms to the regulations of the City’s Development
Code and the regulations of any public agency having jurisdiction by law.
The proposed subdivision complies with the density requirements of the City’s
Development Code, and all the improvements required for the site and each unit
will comply with the regulations in the City’s Development Code.
The proposed subdivision should not be approved if the Planning Commission finds that
any of the findings for denial listed at the end of this staff report are applicable.
Architectural Design Review
The massing, scale, quality of the design of the proposed development, quality of
design, and the proposed landscaping is consistent or superior to that of other
developments in the area. The French Country style will complement the other newer
developments along Fano Street. The proposal is consistent with the City’s Multiple
Family Residential Design Guidelines.
All City requirements regarding disabled access and facilities, occupancy limits, building
safety, health code compliance, emergency equipment, environmental regulation
compliance, and parking and site design shall be complied with by the property
owner/applicant to the satisfaction of the Building Official, City Engineer, Development
Services Director, Fire Marshal, and Public Works Services Director, or their respective
designees.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
If it is determined that no significant physical alterations to the site is necessary, then
this project, as construction of an in-fill development project, qualifies as a Class 32
Categorical Exemption per the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) pursuant to Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines. Refer to Attachment No. 6
for the Preliminary Exemption Assessment.
Resolution No. 1998 – TPM 17-03 (74609) & MFADR 17-02
30 Fano Street
July 11, 2017 – Page 6 of 9
PUBLIC NOTICE/COMMENTS
The property owner notified the current tenants of the proposed
project via USPS Certified Mail on June 28, 2017. A public
hearing notice for this item was published in the local
newspaper and mailed to the property owners that are located
within 300 feet of the subject property on June 29, 2017. As of
July 6, 2017, no comments were received regarding this
project.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Parcel Map No.
TPM 17-03 (74609) and Multiple-Family Architectural Design Review No. MFADR 17-
02, subject to the following conditions, and find that the project is Categorically Exempt
from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and adopt Resolution No. 1998:
1. On the plans submitted for plan check in Building Services, two (2) bicycle parking
spaces shall be provided in compliance with Development Code Sec. 9103.07.150.
2. On the plans submitted for plan check in Building Services, the backflow
prevention device shall be screened from public view by a solid wall and
landscaping. The placement and height of the wall shall be subject to review and
approval by the Development Services Director, or designee.
3. The project shall be developed and maintained by the applicant/property owner in
a manner that is consistent with the plans submitted and conditionally approved for
TPM 17-03 (74609) and MFADR 17-02, subject to the approval of the
Development Services Director or designee.
4. The applicant/property owner shall protect in place the existing parkway tree along
Fano Street.
5. The applicant/property owner shall remove and replace the existing curb, gutter,
and sidewalk along Fano Street from property line to property line.
6. The applicant/property owner shall construct a new driveway approach per the City
of Arcadia standard.
7. The applicant/property owner shall remove and replace the existing asphalt alley
and concrete ribbon gutter from property line to property line.
8. The applicant/property owner shall be required to pay a $100 Map fee and $25
Final Map Approval fee prior to the approval of the Tract Map.
9. The project shall comply with the current California Building Code and with the
Arcadia Multi-Family Standards.
10. A Water Meter Clearance Application, filed with the Public Works Services
Department, shall be required prior to permit issuance.
11. New water service installation shall be by the applicant/property owner. Installation
shall be according to the specifications of the Public Works Services Department,
Engineering Division. Abandonment of existing water services, if necessary, shall
Figure 3. Radius Map
Resolution No. 1998 – TPM 17-03 (74609) & MFADR 17-02
30 Fano Street
July 11, 2017 – Page 7 of 9
be by the Developer, according to Public Works Services Department, Engineering
Division specifications.
12. The applicant/property owner shall install separate water meters for each unit.
13. If the water service is to be used to supply both domestic water and fire sprinklers
for each unit, the applicant/property owner shall separate the fire service from the
domestic water service with an approved back flow prevention device.
14. The applicant/property owner shall utilize the existing sewer lateral if possible.
15. The applicant/property owner shall install an automatic sprink ler system per the
City of Arcadia Fire Department Single & Multiple -Family Dwelling Sprinkler
Standard prior to obtaining final occupancy.
16. The applicant/property owner shall integrate low impact development (LID)
strategies into the site design. These strategies include using infiltration trenches,
bio-retention planter boxes, roof drains connected to a landscaped area, pervious
concrete/paver, etc.
17. The applicant/property owner shall comply with all City requirements regarding
building safety, fire prevention, detection, suppression, emergency access, public
right-of-way improvements, parking, water supply and water facilities, sewer
facilities, trash reduction and recycling requirements, and National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) measures to the satisfaction of the
Building Official, Fire Marshal, Public Works Services Director and Development
Services Director. Compliance with these requirements is to be determined by
having fully detailed construction plans submitted for plan check revi ew and
approval by the foregoing City officials and employees.
18. The applicant/property owner shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City
of Arcadia and its officials, officers, employees, and agents from and against any
claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Arcadia, its officials, officers,
employees or agents to attack, set aside, void, or annul any approval or conditional
approval of the City of Arcadia concerning this project and/or land use decision,
including but not limited to any approval or conditional approval of the City Council,
Planning Commission, or City Staff, which action is brought within the time period
provided for in Government Code Section 66499.37 or other provision of law
applicable to this project or decision. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of
any claim, action, or proceeding concerning the project and/or land use decision
and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense of the matter. The City reserves
the right, at its own option, to choose its own attorney to represent the City, its
officials, officers, employees, and agents in the defense of the matter.
19. Approval of TPM 17-03 (74609) and MFADR 17-02 shall not take effect unless on
or before 30 calendar days after the Planning Commission adoption of the
Resolution, the applicant and property owner have executed and filed with the
Community Development Administrator or designee an Acceptance Form available
from the Development Services Department to indicate awareness and acceptance
of these conditions of approval.
Resolution No. 1998 – TPM 17-03 (74609) & MFADR 17-02
30 Fano Street
July 11, 2017 – Page 8 of 9
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
Approval
If the Planning Commission intends to approve this project, the Commission should
move to approve Tentative Parcel Map No. TPM 17-03 (74609) and Multiple Family
Architectural Design Review No. MFADR 17-02, state that the proposal satisfies the
requisite findings, and adopt the attached Resolution No. 1998 that incorporates the
requisite environmental, subdivision, and architectural design review findings, and the
conditions of approval as presented in this staff report, or as modified by the
Commission.
Denial
If the Planning Commission is to deny this project, the Commission should state the
specific findings that the proposal does not satisfy based on the evidence presented
with specific reasons for denial, and move to deny Tentative Parcel Map No. TPM 17-03
(74609) and Multiple Family Architectural Design Review No. MFADR 17-02, and direct
staff to prepare a resolution for adoption at the next meeting that incorporates the
Commission’s decision and specific findings. The Planning Commission may wish to
consider the following findings, which must be expanded upon with specific reasons for
denial:
D.1. That the proposed map is not consistent with the appl icable general and specific
plans as specified in Section 66451 of the Subdivision Map Act.
D.2. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is not consistent with
applicable general and specific plans and/or the City’s Multiple Family Residential
Design Guidelines.
D.3. That the site is not physically suitable for the type of development.
D.4. That the site is not physically suitable for the density of development.
D.5. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements is likely to cause
substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or
wildlife or their habitat.
D.6. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is likely to cause
serious public health problems.
D.7. That the requested subdivision injuriously affects the neighborhood wherein said
lot is located.
D.8. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with
easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property
within the proposed subdivision. In this connection, the legislative body may
approve a map if it finds that alternate easements for access or for use, will be
provided and that these will be substantially equivalent to ones previously
acquired by the public. This finding shall apply only to easements of record or to
Resolution No. 1998 – TPM 17-03 (74609) & MFADR 17-02
30 Fano Street
July 11, 2017 – Page 9 of 9
easements established by judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction and no
authority is hereby granted to a legislative body to determine that the public at
large has acquired easements for access through or use of property within the
proposed subdivision.
D.9. That the proposed waste discharge would result in or add to violation of
requirements of a California Regional Water Quality Control Board.
If any Planning Commissioner, or other interested party has any questions or comments
regarding this matter prior to the July 11, 2017, Planning Commission Meeting, please
contact Associate Planner, Jordan Chamberlin at (626) 821-4334, or
JChamberlin@ArcadiaCA.gov.
Jason Kruckeberg
Assistant City Manager/
Development Services Director
Attachment No. 1: Resolution No. 1998
Attachment No. 2: Aerial Photo with Zoning Information and Photos of the Subject
Property and Vicinity
Attachment No. 3: Historical Report
Attachment No. 4: Tentative Parcel Map No. TPM 17-03 (74609)
Attachment No. 5: Proposed Architectural Plans
Attachment No. 6: Preliminary Exemption Assessment
Attachment No. 1
Attachment No. 1
Resolution No. 1998
Attachment No. 2
Attachment No. 2
Aerial Photo with Zoning Information and
Photos of the Subject Property and Vicinity
N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
N/A
Property Characteristics
Zoning: R-3
General Plan: HDR
Lot Area (sq ft): 8,001
Main Structure / Unit (sq. ft.): 893
Year Built: 1938
Number of Units: 3
Overlays
Architectural Design Overlay: N/A
Downtown Overlay: N/A
Downtown Parking Overlay: N/A
Parking Overlay: N/A
Racetrack Event Overlay: N/A
Residential Flex Overlay: N/A
Special Height Overlay: N/A
Site Address: 30 FANO ST
Parcel Number: 5779-012-023
Property Owner(s): MIRA INVESTMENTS LLC
Selected parcel highlighted
Parcel location within City of Arcadia
This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for
reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current,
or otherwise reliable.
Report generated 29-Jun-2017
Page 1 of 1
View of the subject property, 30 Fano Street
View of neighboring property to the east, 34 Fano Street
View of neighboring property to the west, 22 Fano Street
View of neighboring property to the northwest, 27 Fano Street
View of neighboring properties to the north, 33 Fano Street
View of neighboring property to the northeast, 37 Fano Street
Attachment No. 3
Attachment No. 3
Historical Report
Attachment No. 4
Attachment No. 4
Tentative Parcel Map No. TPM 17-03
(74609)
Attachment No. 5
Attachment No. 5
Proposed Architectural Plans
SCALE: 1" = 10'-0"SITE PLAN17PROJECT SUMMARYFIRE DEPT. REQUIREMENTSINGLE & MULTI FAMILY DWELLINGS(FOUR ATTACHED UNITS OR LESS)FIRE SPRINKLER REQUIREMENTSGENERAL NOTES:SHEET INDEXLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSTRUCTURAL ENGINEERCIVIL & SOILS ENGINEERMECHANICAL ENGINEER4CONSULTINGENGINEERING3N.T.S.REQ'D FRONT SETBACK 25'-0"8GENERAL NOTESDEFERRED SUBMITTALS9210PROJECT SITEA. MAIL BOXN.T.S.BLDG. BUNIT #2BLDG. BUNIT #3BLDG. AUNIT #12-CARGARAGE2-CARGARAGE9'X19'GUESTPARKING9'X19'GUESTPARKINGINTERLOCKINGPAVERS (TYP.)INTERLOCKINGPAVERS (TYP.)CONC.DRIVEWAYINTERLOCKINGPAVERS (TYP.)INTERLOCKINGPAVERS (TYP.)PEA GRAVEL PATHPEA GRAVEL PATHPEA GRAVEL PATHCONC. WALKWAYPATIOFRONTPORCHPATIOPATIOSIDEWALKSIDEWALKCONC. WALKWAYGROUNDCOVER2-CARGARAGECONC.DRIVEWAY2016 CALGREEN MANDATORY MEASURES5VICINITY MAP6N.T.S.2PRIVATE YARD209 SQ. FT.PRIVATE YARD185 SQ. FT.PRIVATE YARD144 SQ. FT.DateScaleJobSheetDrawnNOREVISIONSDATET-13-UNIT CONDOMINIUM30 FANO STREETARCADIA, CAH.A.6/22/2017SEE PLAN2017-09
2-CAR GARAGEBLDG BUNIT #2BLDG CUNIT #3BLDG AUNIT #12-CAR GARAGE2-CAR GARAGE3-UNIT CONDOMINIUM30 FANO ST.ARCADIA, CA 91006L-1022017T.L.JobDrawnSheet1"=10'-0"02-20-17DateScaleAssessor's ID No. 5779-012-023Sheet TitleProjectDATE NOREVISIONSBEN LUNDGREN & ASSOCIATES2605 FAIRFIELD PL.SAN MARINO, CA 91108TEL: 626-535-9544 FAX: 626-535-9534CONSULTANT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, LIC. # 3109TERRY LEE DESIGN GROUP220 W. LESLIE DR.SAN GABRIEL, CA 91775TEL: 626-285-6522 FAX: 626-285-6479Prepared byCONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLANSCALE : 1" = 10'-0"CONCEPTUALLANDSCAPE PLAN9'X19'GUESTPARKING9'X19'GUESTPARKING
ABBREVIATIONS FORDOORS & WINDOWSSECOND FLOOR PLANSCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 1,006 SQ. FT.BUILDING A/ UNIT 1FIRST FLOOR PLANSCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 540 SQ. FT.BUILDING A/ UNIT 1540 + 1,006 = 1,546INDICATE CEILING HT.0'-0"2-CAR GARAGE407 S.F.PWDR. RM.DINING RM.LIVING RM.KITCHENW.I.C.MASTER SUITEBEDROOM #1BEDROOM #2BATH #1CLO.MASTERBATHBATH #2LANDINGCLO.WALL LEDGENDINDICATE CEILING HT.0'-0"DateScaleJobSheetDrawnNOREVISIONSDATEA-13-UNIT CONDOMINIUM30 FANO STREETARCADIA, CAH.A.6/22/2017SEE PLAN2017-09
SECOND FLOOR PLANSCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 1,006 SQ. FT.SECOND FLOOR PLANSCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 991 SQ. FT.BUILDING B/ UNIT 3INDICATE CEILING HT.0'-0"BUILDING B/ UNIT 2FIRST FLOOR PLANSCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 548 SQ. FT.BUILDING B/ UNIT 2548 + 1,006 = 1,554FIRST FLOOR PLANSCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 555 SQ. FT.BUILDING B/ UNIT 3550 + 991 = 1,541INDICATE CEILING HT.0'-0"LIVING RM.PWDR. RM.TRASH & RECYCLABLESENCLOSURE97 S.F.2-CAR GARAGE430 S.F.LAUNDRY2-CAR GARAGE383 S.F.LAUNDRYLIVING RM.PWDR. RM.KITCHENKITCHENDINING RM.DINING RM.CLO.CLO.W.I.C.MASTER SUITEBEDROOM #1BEDROOM #2BATH #1MASTER SUITEMASTERBATHBEDROOM #2BEDROOM #1CLO.W.I.C.W.I.C.MASTER BATHBATH #2BATH #1BATH #2LANDINGLANDINGINDICATE CEILING HT.0'-0"INDICATE CEILING HT.0'-0"ABBREVIATIONS FORDOORS & WINDOWSWALL LEDGENDDateScaleJobSheetDrawnNOREVISIONSDATEA-23-UNIT CONDOMINIUM30 FANO STREETARCADIA, CAH.A.6/22/2017SEE PLAN2017-09
ROOF PLANROOF PLANBUILDING BBUILDING ASCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"DateScaleJobSheetDrawnNOREVISIONSDATEA-33-UNIT CONDOMINIUM30 FANO STREETARCADIA, CAH.A.6/22/2017SEE PLAN2017-09
ELEVATION KEY NOTEGENERAL NOTESNORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"UNIT 1EAST EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"UNIT 1SOUTH EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"UNIT 1I HOUR RATED WALLI HOUR RATED WALLWEST EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"UNIT 1DateScaleJobSheetDrawnNOREVISIONSDATEA-43-UNIT CONDOMINIUM30 FANO STREETARCADIA, CAH.A.6/22/2017SEE PLAN2017-09
EAST EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"UNIT 2&3WEST EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"UNIT 2&3NORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"UNIT 2&3SOUTH EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"UNIT 2&3I HOUR RATED WALLI HOUR RATED WALLELEVATION KEY NOTEGENERAL NOTESDateScaleJobSheetDrawnNOREVISIONSDATEA-53-UNIT CONDOMINIUM30 FANO STREETARCADIA, CAH.A.6/22/2017SEE PLAN2017-09
Attachment No. 6
Attachment No. 6
Preliminary Exemption Assessment
Preliminary Exem ption Assessment FORM “A”
PRELIMINARY EXEMPTION ASSESSMENT
(Certificate of Determination
When Attached to Notice of Exemption)
1. Name or description of project: Tentative Parcel Map No. TPM 17-03 (74609) and Multiple Family
Architectural Design Review No. MFADR 17-02 for a three unit,
residential condominium development
2. Project Location – Identify street
address and cross streets or attach
a map showing project site
(preferably a USGS 15’ or 7 1/2’
topographical map identified by
quadrangle name):
30 Fano Street (between S. Santa Anita Avenue and S. 1st
Avenue)
3. Entity or person undertaking
project:
A.
B. Other (Private) Sanyao International Inc.
(1) Name Robert Tong
(2) Address 255 E. Santa Clara St. #200
Arcadia, CA 91006
4. Staff Determination:
The Lead Agency’s Staff, having undertaken and completed a preliminary review of this project in
accordance with the Lead Agency's "Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA)" has concluded that this project does not require further environmental assessment
because:
a. The proposed action does not constitute a project under CEQA.
b. The project is a Ministerial Project.
c. The project is an Emergency Project.
d. The project constitutes a feasibility or planning study.
e. The project is categorically exempt.
Applicable Exemption Class: Section 15332 (Class 32, In-Fill Development Project)
f. The project is statutorily exempt.
Applicable Exemption:
g. The project is otherwise exempt
on the following basis:
h. The project involves another public agency which constitutes the Lead Agency.
Name of Lead Agency:
Date: June 26, 2017 Staff: Jordan Chamberlin, Associate Planner