HomeMy WebLinkAboutFindings and Action Form- Conditional ApprovalHighlandsArcadia
r w
Architectural Review Board
Findings and Action Report
File No.: 0-008-2019 Date: 03/29/2019
Project Address: 2125 Canyon Road
Applicant: Scott Yang
Owner (if different) Nevis Capital, LLC
Project Description: New construction on currently vacant lot._
FINDINGS
SITE PLANNING - The proposed project IS consistent with the Site Planning Guidelines_
II. ENTRY -The proposed project IS consistent with the Entry Guidelines.
III. MASSING -The proposed project IS consistent with the Massing Guidelines based on the width
and of the proposed structure on the lot and the upper story of the structure being set back from the first
floor and the garage.
IV. SCALE - The proposed project IS consistent with the Scale Guidelines.
V. ROOFS - The proposed project IS consistent with the Roofing Guidelines based on the use of
traditional style concrete tiles.
Vl. FACADE DESIGN - The proposed project IS consistent with the Facade Design Guidelines based
on the use of natural stonework which is in scale with the home's overall design and use of color on the
stucco and siding material.
VII. DETAILS - The proposed project IS consistent with the Guidelines for Architectural Details. The
details are high quality and are consistent with the architectural style.
VIII. MATERIALS & COLORS - The proposed project IS consistent with the Guidelines.
IX. LANDSCAPE & HARDSCAPE -- The proposed project IS consistent with the Guidelines as
discussed in the Site Planning section. Conditional Approval was provided based on the proposal
being revised to include the installation of an irrigation system sufficient to maintain vegetation
growth on the crib wall.
X. FENCES & WALLS - The proposed project IS consistent with the Guidelines for Fences and
Walls, excluding the need to comment on the crib wall that has already been approved by the City.
Page 1 of 3
X1. ARCHITECTURAL STYLE - The proposed project IS consistent with the Guidelines as discussed
for Contemporary/Modern. The proposed project conservatively applies this architectural style in
order to be compatible with the neighborhood.
XII. ADDITIONS & ALTERATIONS - N/A
X11I. STREETSCAPE - The proposed project IS consistent with the Streetscape because of its width
on the lot, conservative application of the architectural style, as well as, use of material and color.
XIV. MINIMUM FLOOR AREA & SETBACKS - The proposed project IS consistent with the
Minimum Floor Area and Setback Guidelines.
XV. GARAGES - The proposed project IS consistent with the Guidelines for Garages.
XVI. EXTERIOR BUILDING MATERIALS & APPEARANCE - Refer to the above reference
comments.
XVII. AFFECT ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES & NEIGHBORHOOD -- The proposed home on the
previously approved building pad is compatible with the neighborhood and is not within the
sightlines of the adjacent South or East homes on Canyon Road_ The lot to the North is currently
vacant.
Page 2 of 3
ACTION
_Approved/ X Conditionally Approved/ Denied
These Findings and Action were made by the following ARB Members of the Association at a
meeting held on March 29, 2019 at 2201 Canyon Road, Arcadia (See Section IX above for condition
of approval.)
Members In Attendance -Vote:
Lee Kuo - Yes
David Arvizu- Yes
Dean Obst- Yes
Patrick Cronin - Yes
Sunny Padival - Yes
Signature: �,—
Dean Obst, ARB Chair
EXPIRATION - If for a period of one (z) year from the date of approval, any project for which plans have
been approved by the ARB, has not begun construction (as evidenced by clearing and grading
and/or/the installation of a new foundation and/or by installation of new materials on a structure that
is being remodeled) or has been unused, abandoned or discontinued, said approval shall become null
and void and of no effect. Such project may be resubmitted to the ARB for renewed approval; however,
the ARB shall review the project as if it had not been previously approved in accordance with the
current standards in effect.
APPEALS - Appeals from the ARB shall be made to the Planning Commission. Planning Commission
decisions on ARB cases may be appealed to the City Council. Said appeals shall be made in writing and
delivered to Planning Services within seven (7) calendar days of the ARB's decision and shall be
accompanied by an appeal fee in accordance with the applicable fee schedule adopted by resolution of
the City Council. Upon receipt of an appeal in proper form, such appeal shall be processed by Planning
Services in accordance with the same procedures applicable to appeals from. the Modification Committee,
except that noticing shall be consistent with ARB noticing.