Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFindings and Action Form- Conditional ApprovalHighlandsArcadia r w Architectural Review Board Findings and Action Report File No.: 0-008-2019 Date: 03/29/2019 Project Address: 2125 Canyon Road Applicant: Scott Yang Owner (if different) Nevis Capital, LLC Project Description: New construction on currently vacant lot._ FINDINGS SITE PLANNING - The proposed project IS consistent with the Site Planning Guidelines_ II. ENTRY -The proposed project IS consistent with the Entry Guidelines. III. MASSING -The proposed project IS consistent with the Massing Guidelines based on the width and of the proposed structure on the lot and the upper story of the structure being set back from the first floor and the garage. IV. SCALE - The proposed project IS consistent with the Scale Guidelines. V. ROOFS - The proposed project IS consistent with the Roofing Guidelines based on the use of traditional style concrete tiles. Vl. FACADE DESIGN - The proposed project IS consistent with the Facade Design Guidelines based on the use of natural stonework which is in scale with the home's overall design and use of color on the stucco and siding material. VII. DETAILS - The proposed project IS consistent with the Guidelines for Architectural Details. The details are high quality and are consistent with the architectural style. VIII. MATERIALS & COLORS - The proposed project IS consistent with the Guidelines. IX. LANDSCAPE & HARDSCAPE -- The proposed project IS consistent with the Guidelines as discussed in the Site Planning section. Conditional Approval was provided based on the proposal being revised to include the installation of an irrigation system sufficient to maintain vegetation growth on the crib wall. X. FENCES & WALLS - The proposed project IS consistent with the Guidelines for Fences and Walls, excluding the need to comment on the crib wall that has already been approved by the City. Page 1 of 3 X1. ARCHITECTURAL STYLE - The proposed project IS consistent with the Guidelines as discussed for Contemporary/Modern. The proposed project conservatively applies this architectural style in order to be compatible with the neighborhood. XII. ADDITIONS & ALTERATIONS - N/A X11I. STREETSCAPE - The proposed project IS consistent with the Streetscape because of its width on the lot, conservative application of the architectural style, as well as, use of material and color. XIV. MINIMUM FLOOR AREA & SETBACKS - The proposed project IS consistent with the Minimum Floor Area and Setback Guidelines. XV. GARAGES - The proposed project IS consistent with the Guidelines for Garages. XVI. EXTERIOR BUILDING MATERIALS & APPEARANCE - Refer to the above reference comments. XVII. AFFECT ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES & NEIGHBORHOOD -- The proposed home on the previously approved building pad is compatible with the neighborhood and is not within the sightlines of the adjacent South or East homes on Canyon Road_ The lot to the North is currently vacant. Page 2 of 3 ACTION _Approved/ X Conditionally Approved/ Denied These Findings and Action were made by the following ARB Members of the Association at a meeting held on March 29, 2019 at 2201 Canyon Road, Arcadia (See Section IX above for condition of approval.) Members In Attendance -Vote: Lee Kuo - Yes David Arvizu- Yes Dean Obst- Yes Patrick Cronin - Yes Sunny Padival - Yes Signature: �,— Dean Obst, ARB Chair EXPIRATION - If for a period of one (z) year from the date of approval, any project for which plans have been approved by the ARB, has not begun construction (as evidenced by clearing and grading and/or/the installation of a new foundation and/or by installation of new materials on a structure that is being remodeled) or has been unused, abandoned or discontinued, said approval shall become null and void and of no effect. Such project may be resubmitted to the ARB for renewed approval; however, the ARB shall review the project as if it had not been previously approved in accordance with the current standards in effect. APPEALS - Appeals from the ARB shall be made to the Planning Commission. Planning Commission decisions on ARB cases may be appealed to the City Council. Said appeals shall be made in writing and delivered to Planning Services within seven (7) calendar days of the ARB's decision and shall be accompanied by an appeal fee in accordance with the applicable fee schedule adopted by resolution of the City Council. Upon receipt of an appeal in proper form, such appeal shall be processed by Planning Services in accordance with the same procedures applicable to appeals from. the Modification Committee, except that noticing shall be consistent with ARB noticing.