HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 09b - Amendments to the City's Architectural Design Guidelines
DATE: October 15, 2019
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Jason Kruckeberg, Assistant City Manager/Development Services Director
Lisa L. Flores, Planning & Community Development Administrator
Prepared By: Jordan Chamberlin, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY’S ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN
GUIDELINES, INCLUDING A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FROM THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (“CEQA”)
RESOLUTION NO. 7272 AMENDING REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO
PROPERTIES IN THE FIVE (5) SINGLE-FAMILY HOMEOWNERS’
ASSOCIATION ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN ZONE AREAS
Recommendation: Adopt
RESOLUTION NO. 7273 ADOPTING THE UPDATED CITYWIDE
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN GUIDELINES
Recommendation: Adopt
ORDINANCE NO. 2363 ADOPTING TEXT AMENDMENT NO. TA 19-01
TO AMEND VARIOUS SECTIONS OF ARTICLE IX, CHAPTER 1 OF THE
ARCADIA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD AND UPDATE THE
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, PROCESSES, AND PROCEDURES
FOR THE FIVE CITY-DESIGNATED HOMEOW NERS’ ASSOCIATION
AREAS
Recommendation: Introduce
SUMMARY
In 2017, the Development Services Department retained the services of RRM Design
Group to complete an update of the Citywide Architectural Design Guidelines. As part of
the Update, Resolution No. 6770, the Resolution related to development in the five City-
designated Homeowners’ Associations (“HOAs”), was also updated to improve the
coordination of the design review and building permit process between the City and the
HOAs. This resulted in codifying the HOA regulations where they can be easily found in
the Development Code. The primary objective of the Design Guidelines Update was to
Design Guidelines Update and HOAs
October 15, 2019
Page 2 of 11
ensure consistency with the General Plan and Development Code, and to encourage
better design in the community. This effort has created documents that are easy to use
and clearly convey qualitative aspects of design and contextual compatibility that are
not effectively addressed by the development standards found in the Development
Code.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 7272 (refer to Attachment
No. 1) and Resolution No. 7273 (refer to Attachment No. 2), amending the City’s design
guidelines and the regulations and processes of the five City-designated HOAs, and
introduce Ordinance No. 2356 (Attachment No. 3) codifying the HOAs’ development
standards into the City’s Development Code under Text Amendment No. TA 19-01, with
a Categorical Exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”).
BACKGROUND
The City first adopted design guidelines for commercial, industrial, and multi-family
residential projects in 2002. In 2005, the City adopted the first single-family residential
design guidelines for properties not located in HOA areas, and the most recent update
was in 2009. These guidelines have been critical in assisting staff with the design
review process and in promoting neighborhood compatibility. The five City-designated
HOAs have independent Architectural Review Boards (“ARBs”) that are responsible for
administering design review within the HOA boundaries based on development
standards, processes, and procedures set forth in City Council Resolution No. 6770,
which was last updated in 2012. The HOAs also utilize and rely upon the Single-Family
Residential Design Guidelines during their design review process.
Following the adoption of the Development Code Update in 2016, the City turned its
attention to the Citywide Design Guidelines and Resolution No. 6770. This is the last set
of documents that need to be updated to implement the City’s General Plan, which was
substantially updated in 2010. Because of the fast pace of development in recent years
and the change in the types of development being proposed, the guidelines needed to
be updated to provide clear and useful recommendations for the design, construction,
review, and approval of projects in Arcadia.
Development Services Staff worked closely with the consultant, RRM Design Group, to
modernize the existing guidelines and address the recurring challenges in the review of
projects during the design review process. This also included a review of Resolution No.
6770 to identify outdated standards, inconsistencies in the processes within the
Development Code, and ways to improve the design review process.
The Design Guidelines Update process has involved several levels of community
outreach and public participation. The public outreach consisted of Stakeholders
Interviews; one (1) Community Meeting; and two (2) meetings with the HOAs. A Design
Guidelines Update webpage (www.ArcadiaCa.gov/designguidelinesupdate) was created
for the public to view all the updated documents, provide input and/or comments, and
Design Guidelines Update and HOAs
October 15, 2019
Page 3 of 11
obtain updates throughout the process. Additionally, a letter was sent to all the
stakeholders that use the design guidelines on a regular basis regarding the Community
Meeting; a month prior to the meeting, a notice was published in the Arcadia Weekly
newspaper; and social media posts were sent out weekly in the months leading up to
the meeting. Each of the public outreach components is described below:
1. Stakeholder Interviews were conducted on October 25, 2017, and October 26,
2017, with the consultant team of RRM Design Group. Those interviewed
included architects, designers, developers, City Council Members, Planning
Commission Members, and Planning staff. A separate meeting for members of
the HOAs was also held. The interviewees were asked a series of questions
regarding overarching concerns as well as specific topics. Participants were also
given the opportunity to discuss issues of significance to them that were not
otherwise discussed in response to specific questions.
2. Meetings with the HOAs were conducted between September 19, 2018, and
October 23, 2018. Staff met with either the entire ARB or the ARB Chairperson
for the Arcadia Highlands Homeowners’ Association (Highlands), Santa Anita
Oaks Association (Oaks), Rancho Santa Anita Residents' Association (Lower
Rancho), and Santa Anita Village Community Association of Arcadia (Village)
HOAs. The only HOA that did not participate in this process was the Rancho
Santa Anita Property Owners Association (Upper Rancho). There were
scheduling conflicts with ARB members in addition to the fact that there was only
one ARB meeting during this time period. Participants were asked questions
about the ARBs’ review process as outlined in Resolution No. 6770 and to
identify any concerns about the design review process. Participants were also
given the opportunity to discuss issues of significance to them that were not
otherwise discussed in response to specific questions.
On January 17, 2019, a meeting was held with the HOAs to provide an overview
of the changes to Resolution No. 6770 and the proposed text amendment. A total
of 13 representatives from the HOAs were in attendance with at least one
representative from each HOA present, including the Upper Rancho.
3. A Community Meeting was held on July 13, 2019, to review and discuss the
major changes proposed in the Design Guidelines Update, Resolution No. 6770,
and the proposed text amendment. The comments provided by the attendees
were positive. Those who commented found the revisions to be an improvement
and a move in the right direction, but did express concern regarding the photos
used in the Single-Family Residential Design Guidelines. They felt that some of
the photos were not good representations of the quality and type of single-family
development that is typical or should be encouraged in Arcadia. In response to
these comments, changes have been made to the majority of the photos used in
the document to depict more appropriate single-family development (refer to
Attachment No. 4 for the List of Refinements).
Design Guidelines Update and HOAs
October 15, 2019
Page 4 of 11
Based on the community outreach and public participation efforts, it was determined
that the current Citywide Design Guidelines do not provide enough predictability for
developers and builders, do not adequately address current development issues or the
types of development being proposed, and do not have the tools to adequately address
residents’ concerns and maintain high design standards. It also became apparent that
updates to Resolution No. 6770 are needed to help streamline the design review
process in the HOA areas and create consistency between the single-family design
process in the HOA and non-HOA areas.
DISCUSSION
As part of the Design Guidelines Update, the Single-Family Residential, Multi-Family
Residential, Commercial, Industrial, and Signage Design Guidelines were revised to
address the changes in development patterns throughout the City, to ensure the best
designs possible, and to encourage architecture that is timeless and authentic. The
guidelines for industrial developments have been removed from the Commercial
Guidelines and are now in a separate, standalone document. Guidelines for Mixed Use
development were created and added to the Commercial Guidelines to create a new
Commercial/Mixed Use Guidelines document.
All of the Guidelines have been modernized to address current and future development
trends. Objectives have been added to every guideline to further emphasize the City’s
priorities and standards for future development. The goal of the Design Guidelines
Update was to provide clear and useful recommendations for the design, construction,
review, and approval of projects. As a result, new guidelines were added throughout
the documents, as well as new images and graphics, to encourage the highest level of
design quality while at the same time providing the flexibility necessary to encourage
creativity on the part of an applicant in response to the existing site conditions.
An explanation of how to use design guidelines, how they are applied, and how they are
applicable to the other documents such as the General Plan and Development Code is
included in the beginning of each document. Tables of contents have been added to
each set of Guidelines, followed by applicable design guidelines that direct users to
desired design strategies for development or redevelopment of their property. The
format has been updated to eliminate redundancy and for ease of reference. A brief
summary of the modifications made to each of the design guideline documents is
provided below.
Single-Family Residential Design Guidelines
The Single-Family Residential Design Guidelines were a major focus of the update
process since a majority of new development that occurs in Arcadia is new single-family
homes. The City’s primary objective is to ensure that all new development meets the
following criteria:
Design Guidelines Update and HOAs
October 15, 2019
Page 5 of 11
• Design within the established neighborhood context and relationship to the
street;
• Reinforce neighborhood compatibility and identity;
• Create visually pleasing streetscape character;
• Maintain the visual quality of the hillside areas;
• Incorporate high-quality architecture consistent with the neighborhood character;
• Reduce water use in landscape design.
The importance of the existing neighborhood context and neighborhood compatibility
has been emphasized throughout the document. A new icon was created to highlight
key guidelines that are important to ensuring compatibility with the surrounding
neighborhood (refer to page 5 of the Single-Family Design Guidelines). New guidelines
were added to cover topics that are typically considered during the design review
process but were not mentioned in the existing Design Guidelines, such as placement
of windows, balconies, and garage(s) to name a few. New guidelines were created for
hillside properties since the Development Code now has regulations for these
properties. The language used in the guidelines has been modernized and refined for
added clarity. A multitude of new images and graphics have been added to provide
current examples of successful single-family development.
Updates were also made to the Architectural Style Guide to include Mediterranean,
Prairie, and Tudor/Cape Cod architectural styles to reflect the architectural styles
recently being proposed in the City.
Multifamily Residential Design Guidelines
The Multifamily Residential Design Guidelines have been updated to emphasize the
importance of neighborhood compatibility in regards to massing, scale, and architectural
design. Additional guidelines have been added to provide guidance on private and
common open space, amenities, and service and equipment areas. Guidelines for
three-story buildings have been added since the Development Code now allows this
type of development. New photos have been added to provide current examples of
multifamily development.
Commercial/Mixed Use Design Guidelines
For added clarity and more specific guidance, the Industrial and Sign guidelines have
been removed from the Commercial Guidelines and placed into their own documents.
New guidelines to address mixed use developments have been added to the
Design Guidelines Update and HOAs
October 15, 2019
Page 6 of 11
Commercial Guidelines to create the Commercial/Mixed Use Design Guidelines. The
new Commercial/Mixed Use Design Guidelines are separated into three sections:
Commercial Design Guidelines, Mixed Use Guidelines, and Guidelines Applicable to
Both Commercial and Mixed Use Development. This makes it easy to understand which
guidelines apply to each type of development and reduces redundancy. With more
commercial and mixed use developments being proposed, the Commercial/Mixed Use
Design Guidelines emphasize appropriate massing of buildings, pedestrian
accessibility, amenities, and enhancing the street presence of projects. The Updated
Commercial/Mixed Use Design Guidelines, when used in conjunction with the City
Center Design Plan, will provide much more specific guidance to applicants and will
help to enhance the City’s downtown core.
Industrial Design Guidelines
The Industrial Design Guidelines are now a standalone document, and the guidelines
have been updated and refined to provide more specific and clear guidance for
industrial developments. New sections and guidelines have also been added for public
and employee break areas. New photos have been added to provide current examples
of industrial development.
Signage Design Guidelines
The Signage Design Guidelines have been updated to address signage in all zones.
The types of signage have been expanded to be consistent with the types of signs
regulated in the Development Code. Images of various types of signs were added to
assist the new business owners and applicants.
Text Amendment, Resolution No. 6770, and Resolution No. 7272
The development standards for the HOA areas are currently located in two separate
documents: Resolution No. 6770 and the City’s Development Code. In order to find all
the development standards for a property within an HOA area, a homeowner and/or
designer currently must review and compare both documents to see which development
standards prevail and which may be in conflict. This has often led to confusion prior to
designing a project and during the design review process.
To help minimize this confusion, the development standards for the HOAs have been
removed from Resolution No. 6770 and codified within Division 2 of the City’s
Development Code (refer to Attachment No. 3). With this change, all of the regulations
for the HOA areas are located in one place: in an easy-to-use table consistent with the
table currently used for the non-HOA areas. The table format is much more user-friendly
for the public, the HOAs, and Planning staff, and it will help reduce errors and confusion
during the design review and Building plan check process. Minor updates were also
made to the language used for some of the development standards to be consistent
with the language already used in the Development Code. For example, Resolution No.
Design Guidelines Update and HOAs
October 15, 2019
Page 7 of 11
6770 uses lot frontage to determine side yard setbacks whereas the Development Code
uses lot width. The HOA development standard has been updated to now refer to lot
width for consistency.
Many of the administrative procedures for single-family design review in non-HOA areas
were updated during the Development Code Update to ensure that processes are
consistent with state law and streamlined to improve the review process. To ensure
consistency for the HOA design review process, the administrative procedure and
processes have been removed from Resolution No. 6770, updated to be consistent with
the process for design review in non-HOA areas, and codified in Divisions 7 and 8 of the
Development Code.
A new section, Section 9107.20 (Site Plan and Design Review: Homeowners
Association Areas) has been added to the Development Code, and it provides the
review process for projects within the HOA areas. It identifies and defines the role of the
three review authorities for the HOA areas (City Review, Short Review, or Regular
Review), and specifies the applicable review authority for different types of construction
activity in an easy-to-use table. The types of construction activities in the table have
been expanded and modernized from what was identified in Resolution No. 6770 to
address the various types of construction that is currently occurring in the HOA areas,
such as solar panels, pool fountains, and façade improvements. Changes were also
made to the level of review required for certain construction activities like roofing, pools
and spas, and other mechanical equipment, in order to make obtaining approvals and
building permits easier and faster for applicants.
The administrative procedures for the ARBs have also been incorporated into Division 8
(Development Code Administration) of the Development Code. Division 8 now provides
very clear procedures for the ARBs that are consistent with the procedures for non-HOA
areas. With the incorporation of the HOA areas into Division 8, the process for
appealing decisions, the effective date of approvals, and the expiration date of
approvals, is clarified. Processes for applicants to request time extensions and major
and minor changes to approved plans have been added for projects in the HOA areas.
For consistency, the deadline to file appeals has been revised from seven calendar
days to within 10 days of the decision, and the public notification area has been revised
from the 12 closest homes to a 300’ radius to be consistent with City noticing
requirements.
With the development standards, processes, and procedures for the HOA areas
incorporated into the Development Code, Resolution No. 6770 will be rescinded and a
new resolution, Resolution No. 7272, will be adopted (refer to Attachment No. 1). To
see how Resolution No. 6770 has been modified to create Resolution No. 7272, refer to
Attachment No. 5.
Resolution No. 7272 will be a guiding document for the ARBs that focuses on describing
the purpose of the ARBs. It also grants authority to the ARBs to perform design review
Design Guidelines Update and HOAs
October 15, 2019
Page 8 of 11
in order to protect the character, quality, property values, and architectural character of
the HOA areas. Language has been added to emphasize the importance of the City’s
Design Guidelines during an ARB’s review process so that the relationship between the
ARB’s design review process and the City’s Design Guidelines is clear.
Further, Resolution No. 7272 specifies the requirements, authority, and limitations
relevant to the ARBs. New language has been incorporated throughout the document to
help minimize ambiguity regarding the ARB’s role in the design review process.
Resolution No. 6770 outlined certain requirements that needed to be met in order for
the ARBs to be able to perform design review such as by-laws, record keeping, and
compliance with the Brown Act. Additional requirements have been added to the
Resolution that will require ARB members to participate in training if the City finds it
necessary in order for them to perform their duties. An example may be Historic
Preservation training, since an ordinance was recently adopted that may alter the
design review process, or regular training on ethics, open meeting laws, and the like.
Lastly, the Resolution explains the limits of the ARBs’ power and what they do not have
purview over. For example, interior only changes to structures are not subject to ARB
review. The Resolution also clarifies that the ARBs cannot modify or waive the
requirements of the Development Code, Design Guidelines, or create their own
development standards.
PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING
The Planning Commission (“Commission”) held a public hearing on August 27, 2019, for
the consideration of the proposed resolutions and text amendment. After concluding the
public hearing, the Commission discussed the proposals. The Commission found that
the changes promoted consistency between the Design Guidelines, Development Code,
and General Plan, and that the updated language provided needed clarity. The
Commission appreciated the public outreach efforts and the revisions that were made to
the photos in the Single Family Residential Design Guidelines in order to address
concerns from the public. Also, the Commissioners that had additional comments
regarding the process were conveyed in the Minutes – refer to Attachment No. 6. The
Commission appreciated the public art component of the Design Guidelines and
recommended that public art funding be incorporated into major development projects.
Following the discussion, the Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval
to the City Council (refer to Attachment No. 6 for the August 27, 2019, Planning
Commission Staff Report, Meeting Minutes, and Resolution). The entire Planning
Commission staff report, including attachments can be found at:
https://www.arcadiaca.gov/home/showdocument?id=19630.
Design Guidelines Update and HOAs
October 15, 2019
Page 9 of 11
FINDINGS
Pursuant to Development Code Section 9108.03.060, the Text Amendments may be
approved if all the following findings can be satisfied.
Text Amendment Findings:
1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan and any
applicable specific plan(s).
Facts in Support of the Finding: The proposed text amendment to the City’s
Design Guidelines will be consistent with the goals, policies, and actions of the
General Plan as they will continue to promote high quality design in buildings,
landscape, signage, public realm, and open space areas. The amended
guidelines have been written to reinforce these goals and objectives, and provide
general guidelines for additions, remodels, or construction in any land use area.
In terms of the proposed text amendment to the Development Code, it will codify
the development standards for the HOA areas that were previously found in
Resolution No. 6770. The General Plan recognizes the important role the HOAs
have played in “preserving the character of the residential neighborhoods in the
northern portion of the City.” Incorporating the HOA’s development standards into
the City’s Development Code will minimize confusion since all the regulations will
now be located in one document that provides clear guidance and will remove
inconsistencies between the HOA’s Resolution and City’s single-family design
review process. Therefore, these proposed amendments will provide additional
guidance to aid applicants, ensure the high quality development desired by the
City and the community, and reinforce the General Plan goals and policies, The
proposed amendments will be consistent with General Plan Land Use Goal No. 3
which encourages the “preservation and enhancement of Arcadia’s single-family
neighborhoods, which are an essential part of the City’s core identity.”
2. For Development Code amendments only, the proposed amendment is
internally consistent with other applicable provisions of this Development
Code.
Facts in Support of the Finding: This proposed text amendment to the
Development Code includes codifying the existing development standards and
updating the design review processes and procedures for the five City-
designated HOA areas. The text amendment will not be in conflict with the
Development Code and will be consistent with applicable provisions of the
Development Code. The text amendment will incorporate current development
standards for the HOAs as stated in Resolution No. 6770, and update the design
review processes and procedures in the HOA areas to be consistent with the
City’s design review procedures. Further, the proposed amendments remove
Design Guidelines Update and HOAs
October 15, 2019
Page 10 of 11
existing inconsistencies between several guiding documents, including the
Development Code.
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
The proposed updates are exempt from review under CEQA pursuant to Section
15061(b)(3), which provides that, where it can be seen with certainty that there is no
possibility that a project may have a significant effect on the environment, the project is
not subject to CEQA. The proposed Text Amendment does not create or substantially
alter any existing development standard as it only codifies the existing Homeowners’
Associations development standards that were adopted under City Council Resolution
No. 6770 and procedures as a minor clean up to the Development Code. A Preliminary
Exemption Assessment is included as Attachment No. 7.
PUBLIC COMMENTS/NOTICE
A public hearing notice for this item was published in the Arcadia Weekly on September
12, 2019. As of October 8, 2019, staff has received 15 letters of support on this project
besides what was mentioned at the Community Meeting on July 13, 2019, and through
the outreach process in general.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council:
1. Adopt Resolution No. 7272 amending regulations applicable to properties in the
five (5) Single-Family Homeowners’ Association Architectural Design Zone area.
2. Adopt Resolution No. 7273 adopting the updated Citywide Architectural Design
Guidelines.
3. Introduce Ordinance No. 2363 adopting Text Amendment No. TA 19-01 to
amend various sections of Article IX, Chapter 1 of the Arcadia Municipal Code to
add and update the Development Standards, Processes, and Procedures for the
five City-designated Homeowners’ Association areas.
Attachment No. 1: Resolution No. 7272
Design Guidelines Update and HOAs
October 15, 2019
Page 11 of 11
Attachment No. 2: Resolution No. 7273
Attachment No. 3: Ordinance No. 2363
Attachment No. 4: List of Refinements to the draft Design Guidelines
Attachment No. 5: Changes to Resolution No. 6770
Attachment No. 6: August 27, 2019, Planning Commission Staff Report, Meeting
Minutes, and Resolution
Attachment No. 7: Preliminary Exemption Assessment
Attachment No. 1
Attachment No. 1
Resolution No. 7272 – Five Designated
Homeowners Associations
14
Exhibit “A”
HOA Map and Descriptions
15
Highlands
The area north of the commercial properties fronting on Foothill Boulevard, south
of the northerly City limit, east of Santa Anita Avenue, west of the Los Angeles County
Flood Control District property, extending to the east end of Sycamore Avenue.
Excluding those properties located in Tract 15073 (1500 to 1538 & 1503 to 1537
Highland Oaks Drive) and 1501 Highland Oaks Drive and 307A, 307B, 307C & 307D
East Foothill Boulevard.
Upper Rancho
The property bounded on the south by the centerline of Foothill Boulevard; on the
west by the east line of Michillinda Avenue; on the east by the centerline of Baldwin
Avenue; and on the north by the City limits.
Oaks
Beginning at a point at the intersection of the centerline of Baldwin Avenue and
the centerline of Orange Grove Avenue; thence easterly along the centerline of Orange
Grove Avenue to its intersection with the centerline of Oak Meadow Road; thence
southerly along the centerline of Oak Meadow Road to its intersection with the
centerline of Hacienda Drive; thence westerly along the centerline of Hacienda Drive to
its intersection with the centerline of San Carlos Road; thence southerly along the
centerline of San Carlos Road to its intersection with the centerline of Foothill
Boulevard; thence westerly along the centerline of Foothill Boulevard to its intersection
with the centerline of Baldwin Avenue; thence northerly along the centerline of Baldwin
Avenue to the point of beginning.
Beginning at a point at the intersection of the centerline of Oak Meadow Road
and the centerline of Orange Grove Avenue; thence easterly along the centerline of
Orange Grove Avenue to its intersection with the centerline of Santa Anita Avenue;
thence southerly along the centerline of Santa Anita Avenue to its intersection with the
easterly prolongation of the southerly property line of Lot No. 76 of Tract No. 11074;
thence westerly along said easterly prolongation and said southerly property line to its
intersection with the westerly property line of Lot No. 76 of Tract No. 11074; thence
southerly along the prolongation of said westerly property line to its intersection with the
centerline of Foothill Boulevard; thence westerly along the centerline of Foothill
Boulevard to its intersection with the centerline of San Carlos Road; thence northerly
along the centerline of San Carlos Road to its intersection with the centerline of
Hacienda Drive; thence easterly along the centerline of Hacienda Drive to its
intersection with the centerline of Oak Meadow Road; thence northerly along the
centerline of Oak Meadow Road to the point of beginning.
Beginning at a point at the intersection of the centerline of Santa Anita Avenue
and the easterly prolongation of the southerly property line of Lot No. 76 of Tract No.
16
11074; thence westerly along said easterly prolongation and said southerly property line
to its intersection with the westerly property line of Lot No. 76 of Tract No. 11074;
thence southerly along the prolongation of said westerly property line a distance of 65
feet; thence easterly along a line parallel to the southerly property line of Lot 76 of Tract
No.
11074 to its intersection with the centerline of Santa Anita Avenue; thence
northerly along the centerline of Santa Anita Avenue a distance of 65 feet to the point of
beginning.
Lower Rancho
Area #1 Beginning at a point on easterly line of Michillinda Avenue, said point
being the southwesterly corner of Lot 36, Tract No. 15928; thence easterly along the
southerly boundary of said Tract No. 15928 and Tract No. 14428 to a point which is the
northwesterly corner of Lot 12, Tract No. 15960; thence southerly along the westerly
line of said Lot 12 and its prolongation thereof to its intersection with the centerline of
De Anza Place; thence southerly and easterly along said centerline to its intersection
with the centerline of Altura Road; thence southerly along said centerline to its
intersection with the centerline of Hugo Reid Drive; thence easterly along said centerline
to its intersection with the centerline of Golden West Avenue; thence northwesterly
along said centerline to its intersection with the centerline of Tallac Drive; thence
easterly along said centerline to its intersection with the easterly line of Tract No. 13312;
thence northerly and easterly along the easterly and southerly boundary of said tract to
the southeasterly corner of Lot No. 1 to its intersection with the easterly line of Golden
West Avenue; thence northerly along said easterly line to its intersection with the
southerly line of Vaquero Road; thence easterly along said southerly line to its
intersection with the easterly terminus line of said Vaquero Road; thence northerly along
said easterly line to its intersection with the southerly line of Lot 17 of Tract No. 11215;
thence easterly along said southerly line to its intersection with the easterly line of
aforementioned Tract No. 11215; thence northerly along said easterly line and its
prolongation thereof to its intersection with the centerline of Colorado Street; thence
westerly along said centerline to its intersection with the centerline of Altura Road;
thence southerly along said centerline to its intersection with the easterly prolongation of
the northerly line of Tract No. 17430; thence westerly along said northerly line to its
intersection with the easterly line of Michillinda Avenue; thence southerly along said
easterly line to the point of beginning, said point being the southwesterly corner of Lot
36 of Tract No. 15928.
Area #2 Beginning at the northwesterly corner of Lot No. 62 of Tract No. 12786;
thence southerly along the westerly line of said Lot and its prolongation thereof to its
intersection with the centerline of Hugo Reid Drive; thence easterly along said center
line to its intersection with the southerly prolongation of the easterly line of Tract No.
14460; thence northerly along said easterly line to its intersection with the northerly line
17
of said tract; thence westerly along said northerly line to its intersection with the westerly
line of said Tract No. 14460; thence southwesterly along said westerly line, and its
southwesterly prolongation thereof, to its intersection with the northeasterly corner of
Lot No. 61 of Tract No. 12786; thence westerly along the northerly line of said tract to
the point of beginning, said point being the northwesterly corner of Lot 62 of Tract No.
12786.
Area #3 All properties with that area bounded on the west by Baldwin Avenue,
on the north and east by Colorado Street and on the south by the southerly tract
boundaries of Tract Nos. 14940 and 15318.
Village
Beginning at a point on easterly line of Michillinda Avenue, said point being the
southwesterly corner of Lot 36, Tract No. 15928; thence easterly along the southerly
boundary of said Tract No. 15928 and Tract No. 14428 to a point which is the
northwesterly corner of Lot 12, Tract No. 15960; thence southerly along the westerly
line of said Lot 12 and its prolongation thereof to its intersection with the centerline of
De Anza Place; thence southerly and easterly along said centerline to its intersection
with the centerline of Altura Road; thence southerly along said centerline to its
intersection with the centerline of Hugo Reid Drive; thence easterly along said
centerline to its intersection with the centerline of Golden West Avenue; thence
northwesterly along said centerline to its intersection with the centerline of Tallac Drive;
thence easterly along said centerline to its intersection with the easterly line of Tract No.
13312; thence southerly along the easterly and northerly lines of Lots 11 through 19 of
said tract to be northeast corner of said Lot 19; thence easterly along the easterly
prolongation of said Lot 19 to its intersection with the northwesterly corner of lot 74,
Tract No. 12786; thence easterly along the northerly line of said tract to the
northwesterly corner of Lot 62 of said Tract No. 12786; thence southerly along the
westerly line of said lot and its prolongation thereof to its intersection with the centerline
of Hugo Reid Drive, thence easterly along said centerline to its intersection with the
northeasterly prolongation of the easterly line of Tract 12786; thence southerly along
said easterly line and also the easterly line of Tract No. 12104 to the southeast corner of
Lot 129 of said Tract 12104; thence westerly along the southerly lines of Tract
No.12104, Tract 11688, and Tract No. 11932 and its westerly prolongation to its
intersection with the centerline of Cortez Road; thence northerly along said centerline to
its intersection with the centerline of distance a 150' more or less to a point; thence
northerly to a point on the northerly line of Portola Drive, said point being 140' westerly
from the northwesterly corner of Portola Drive and Cortez Road, thence northerly to the
southwest corner of Lot 28, Tract 11932; thence northerly along the westerly line of said
tract and its prolongation thereof to its intersection with the centerline of Balboa Drive;
thence westerly along said centerline to its intersection with the centerline of Sunset
Boulevard; thence northwesterly along said centerline to its intersection with the
southerly prolongation of the easterly line of Michillinda Avenue; thence northerly along
said easterly line to the point of beginning, said point being the southwesterly corner of
Lot 36, Tract No. 15928.
Attachment No. 2
Attachment No. 2
Resolution No. 7273 – Design Guidelines
Exhibit A
Exhibit “A”
Design Guidelines
DRAFT JUNE 2019
SINGLE -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
DESIGN GUIDELINES
CITY OF ARCADIA
SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES ii Draft
June 2019
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
CITY COUNCIL
April Verlato, Mayor
Roger Chandler, Mayor Pro Tem
Peter Amundson, Council Member
Tom Beck, Council Member
Sho Tay, Council Member
PLANNING COMMISSION
Brad Thompson, Chair
Deborah Lewis, Vice Chair
Ken Chan, Commissioner
Zi Lin, Commissioner
Marilynne Wilander, Commissioner
SPECIAL THANKS
LEAD CITY STAFF
Jason Kruckeberg, Assistant City Manager/Development Services Director
Lisa Flores, Planning & Community Development Administrator
Jordan Chamberlin, Associate Planner
SUPPORTING CITY STAFF
Dominic Lazzaretto, City Manager
Luis Torrico, Senior Planner
Vanessa Quiroz, Associate Planner
CONSULTANT TO THE CITY
RRM Design Group
Draft
June 2019
CITY OF ARCADIA
SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES iii
CITY OF ARCADIA
SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES iv Draft
June 2019
This page left intentionally blank.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CITY OF ARCADIA
SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES v Draft
June 2019
TABLE OF CONTENTS
A. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1
1. Introduction ................................................................................................. 2
2. How These Design Guidelines are Applied .................................................. 3
3. How to Use These Design Guidelines .......................................................... 4
4. Applicability to Other City Documents ........................................................ 6
B. DESIGN GUIDELINES ......................................................................................... 7
1. Site Planning Principles and Neighborhood Context ................................... 9
2. Forms and Mass ...................................................................................... 10
3. Frontage Conditions .................................................................................. 12
4. Garages and Driveways............................................................................ 13
5. Architectural Styles .................................................................................... 14
6. Height, Bulk, and Scale ............................................................................. 15
7. Roofline. .................................................................................................... 16
8. Entries ....................................................................................................... 17
9. Windows and Doors .................................................................................. 18
10. Articulation ................................................................................................ 19
11. Facade Details .......................................................................................... 19
12. Colors and Materials ................................................................................. 20
13. Accessory Lighting .................................................................................... 22
14. Additions, Alterations, and Accessory Buildings/Structures ..................... 22
15. Hillside Properties .................................................................................... 23
16. Fences, Walls, Gates, and Hedges ............................................................ 25
17. Impervious Coverage and Landscape Areas ........................................... 26
18. Sample Planting Palette ............................................................................ 28
Appendix A ............................................................................................................ 33
Appendix B ............................................................................................................ 43
CITY OF ARCADIA
SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES vi Draft
June 2019
INTRODUCTION
This page left intentionally blank.
INTRODUCTION
CITY OF ARCADIA
SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES 1 Draft
June 2019
A. INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION
CITY OF ARCADIA
SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES 2 Draft
June 2019
1. Introduction
The City of Arcadia’s General Plan and
Development Code promotes high quality design
in buildings, landscape, signage, public realm, and
open space areas. These documents also identify
community design principles applicable to the
City’s ongoing redevelopment, including ‘‘Creating
Identifiable Places’’, ‘‘Improving the Public Realm’’,
and ‘‘Improving the Private Realm.’’ The General
Plan stresses the importance of quality in design
and the impact that site design and building form
has on enhancing the visual image of Arcadia and
establishing places that people enjoy. The design
guidelines contained within this document have
been written to reinforce these goals and objectives
and provide general guidelines for any addition,
remodel, or construction within any single-family
land use district.
“Arcadia’s single-family and multifamily residential
neighborhoods have given the City its identity
as a Community of Homes. The City protects
and preserves the character and quality of its
neighborhoods by requiring harmonious design,
careful planning, and the integration of sustainable
principles.” Primary objectives associated with
developing a quality project within Arcadia include
designing within the established neighborhood
context and relationship to the street, reinforcing
neighborhood compatibility and identity, creating
visually pleasing streetscape character, maintaining
the visual quality of the hillside areas, incorporating
high-quality architecture consistent with the
neighborhood character, and reducing water use in
landscape design.
As noted in the City’s General Plan - Land Use
Element, Arcadia has many long-established, single-
family residential neighborhoods which are at the
core of its identity. These residential neighborhoods
fall into the Residential Estates (RE), Very Low
Density Residential (VLR), and Low Density
Residential (LDR) land use categories. Incorporated
in 1903, Arcadia’s residential roots trace back to the
1930s when the first subdivisions began appearing
within the City. These subdivisions replaced what
had previously been agricultural lands. The first
subdivisions occurred in the northernmost portion
of Baldwin Ranch, which included estate home
neighborhoods and is now part of the Rancho Santa
Anita and Santa Anita Oaks Property Owners’
Associations. In the southern area of the City, small
poultry and produce farms transitioned rapidly
to subdivisions that offered moderately priced
homes. Characteristics of individual properties and
neighborhoods vary widely through the individual
neighborhoods of the City.
INTRODUCTION
CITY OF ARCADIA
SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES 3 Draft
June 2019
Many of these areas have an established neighborhood
character and identity, which is often further
emphasized through a strong streetscape character
with elements such as consistent setbacks, landscaping
along parkways and mature trees.
• Residential Estates
• Large, estate-type lots of 22,000 square feet or
greater
• Greater variation in lot dimensions
• Curving streets, no sidewalks, that follow
pattern of the topography
• Mature trees prevalent
• Very Low Density Residential
• Lots ranging from 10,000 to 22,000 square feet
or larger
• Some variation in lot dimensions
• Curving and straight streets, infrequent
sidewalks, that follow pattern of the topography
• Mature trees common
• Low Density Residential
• Traditional lots ranging from 7,200 to 10,000
square feet in size
• Similar lot dimensions
• Streets are straighter in nature, with infrequent
sidewalks that may or may not follow
topography
• May or may not have mature trees
2. How These Design Guidelines
are Applied
These Design Guidelines will be utilized during the
City’s development review process to encourage
the highest level of design quality while at the same
time providing the flexibility necessary to encourage
creativity on the part of an applicant in response to
existing site conditions. The Design Guidelines contain
design objectives on page 8, followed by applicable
design guidelines that direct users to desired design
strategies for development or redevelopment of their
property. The objectives seek to highlight the major
factors affecting the development of a particular land
use while also reinforcing direction provided by the
General Plan and Development Code.
Designers and developers are urged to become familiar
with these guidelines and to apply them throughout the
design process to assure that the design, review, and
permitting processes are as efficient as possible. No
claim can be made that these guidelines encompass
every possible technique for achieving a high level
of design quality. It is important to note that the
guidelines are a minimum starting point for quality
development, and the designer is encouraged to use
their own creativity and experience to improve upon the
means for realizing this highest level of quality design.
The guidelines do not seek to impose an overriding
architectural style, a limited color palette, or an artificial
design theme, but rather seek to promote the positive
design characteristics currently found throughout the
City.
INTRODUCTION
CITY OF ARCADIA
SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES 4 Draft
June 2019
3. How to Use These Design
Guidelines
Property owners, developers, architects, designers,
and contractors proposing a new development or
redevelopment within Arcadia should first review
the appropriate Development Code sections
governing their property. They should then proceed
to the Design Guidelines document applicable to
their property’s land use – whether Single-Family
Residential, Multifamily Residential, Commercial/
Mixed Use, Industrial, or Signage.
The goal of this document is to provide clear
and useful recommendations for the design,
construction, review, and approval of development
in Arcadia. The guidelines are intended as a
reference point for a common understanding of
the minimum qualitative design expectations. The
guidelines are offered as one way of achieving
attractive and functional projects that compare
favorably with established community standards. All
development shall comply with the spirit and intent
of the design guidelines presented.
The design guidelines may be interpreted with
some flexibility in the application to specific
projects, as not all design criteria may be
appropriate for each project. In some
circumstances, one guideline may be relaxed in
order to accomplish another, more important
guideline. The overall objective is to ensure that
the intent and spirit of the design guidelines are
followed and to attain the best possible design
within reason.
A building or project should be designed to conform
with a traditional and historically-recognized
architectural style identified and supported by selected
building elements and articulation. (Refer to Appendix
A: Architectural Style Guide for descriptions, examples
and details associated with architectural styles.) In
addition, caution should be exercised when considering
architectural styles that have recently become popular
(i.e. “trendy”), but have not yet stood the test of time.
Historic styles that cannot be faithfully replicated
should be avoided. No single architectural theme is
being promoted, but rather the emphasis is to promote
compatibility. Many of the styles and patterns shown in
the following pictures and graphic illustrations represent
a concept of recommended building elements and
details as opposed to a desired architectural character.
An essential goal of the General Plan and reinforced
by the design guidelines is to ensure neighborhood
compatibility. “No development exists in isolation.
Every act of construction affects and is affected by its
surroundings. Every development, therefore, should be
evaluated for its compatibility in terms of use, scale,
and aesthetics with the neighborhood or district in which
it is located. For small projects, this area
of influence may be considered to be as small as to only
include the buildings directly next door. For large
projects, one must consider entire blocks or corridors.” In
order to ensure quality development within the City of
Arcadia, these Design Guidelines have been created to
promote new infill and redevelopment within the
City while ensuring compatibility with existing uses.
Guidelines that reinforce this objective are identified
with a neighborhood symbol ( ). Together, these
strategies reinforce the individual characteristics that
continue to make Arcadia a desirable place to live.
INTRODUCTION
CITY OF ARCADIA
SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES 5 Draft
June 2019
Applicants pursuing the construction of a new
or remodeled home should ensure that the
community concerns and expectations are
properly addressed within a proposal and the
project is compatible with the surrounding
homes in the neighborhood in which it is being
proposed. Compatibility includes such terms as
“architectural style, mass, scale, orientation,
setback, and architectural elements such as
texture, color, and building materials.” For ease
of reference, these terms are defined in greater
detail within Appendix B of this document.
The following are some of the primary, more
prevalent issues that have become a cause for
concern in recent project submittals and are
important in ensuring new single-family
development relating to existing neighborhood
development patterns:
1. Mass and Scale: Inappropriate massing
and scale are a key concern as large, two- story
homes are replacing smaller, single- story
homes throughout the City.
2. Front Entry: Excessively tall or flat entry
porches can have a towering or monumental
appearance that is inappropriate for most
Arcadia neighborhoods.
3. Garages: Street-facing garages tend to
be uninviting and have the potential to dominate
the front elevation of a home.
4. Architectural Style and Design: Many
new home proposals lack a coherent
architectural style, attempt to combine too many
different style elements, and/or have an
architectural style that is incompatible with the
surrounding homes.
5. Additions and Accessory Buildings:
Additions, as opposed to new homes, have
their own set of design challenges. Poorly-
designed additions and accessory buildings can
ruin the character of an existing home.
6. Colors and Materials: The use of bright or
strong paint colors and/or unnatural building
materials can result in a house that looks out-of-
place in a more traditional, established
neighborhood setting.
7. Landform and Tree Preservation:
Careless removal of mature trees and severe
grading of hillside properties shows little regard
for a site’s natural attributes and degrades
neighborhood character.
In addition, the General Plan stresses the
importance of a sustainable future for Arcadia
that includes strategies to conserve and
enhance local resources and safeguard the
environment. In addition to providing strong
examples of good general design principles, this
document provides designers and builders with
guidance on “sustainable” design. Conventional
design and construction methods can produce
buildings that contribute to excessive resource
consumption, that generate waste, and that are
expensive to operate. The guidelines contained
within this document reinforce this objective and
promote site and building design elements that
utilize green building practices and materials,
preserve existing tree canopy and native
vegetation, promote pervious surfaces, reduce
or better distribute travel demand, encourage
amenities that support transit and other
alternative forms of transportation, including
bicycling and walking, and support mixed- use
development that provides opportunities for
employment and commercial uses adjacent to
residential units. “Sustainability” principles which
can improve the environmental performance of a
project without forcing excessive costs on
builders or developers have been marked with
the symbol of a leaf ( ).
CITY OF ARCADIA
SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES 6 Draft
June 2019
4. Applicability to Other
City Documents
This document is a tool for implementing
the City of Arcadia’s General Plan and
Development Code. While the Design
Guidelines contained herein are not
intended to supersede the requirements
of the Development Code, applicants
should not assume that a project will be
approved by merely adhering to the
City’s minimum zoning standards and
development regulations. Rather, these
Design Guidelines provide additional
guidance to aid applicants in the design
of single-family projects in order to
ensure the high-quality development
desired by the City and the community.
CITY OF ARCADIA
SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES 7 Draft
June 2019
B. DESIGN GUIDELINES
DESIGN GUIDELINES
CITY OF ARCADIA
SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES 8 Draft
June 2019
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
Design Guideline Objectives define Arcadia’s priorities and standards for future development. Many
of them have been derived from land use policies established in the General Plan. Development
should be designed to adhere to the following objectives and the suppo rting guidelines provided.
Objective 1: Protect the character of single-family residential neighborhoods through the
preservation and improvement of their character-defining features.
Objective 2: Create a streetscape presence that is visually pleasing through site planning and
building form and orientation while also maintaining neighborhood character.
Objective 3: Ensure new homes and home additions are consistent in architectural style, scale,
massing, features, and quality as the surrounding neighborhood.
Objective 4: Preserve natural topography of a site.
Objective 5: Balance the aesthetics and use of landscape areas with the need to reduce water
use in planting design.
DESIGN GUIDELINES
CITY OF ARCADIA
SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES 9 Draft
June 2019
1. Site Planning Principles and
Neighborhood Context
a. The location, configuration, size, and design of
new buildings and structures, or the alteration or
enlargement of existing structures, should be
visually harmonious with their respective sites
and compatible with the character and quality of
their surroundings.
b. Natural amenities such as views, trees, and other
similar features unique to the site should be
preserved and incorporated into development
proposals, when feasible.
c. In neighborhoods with an established
architectural style or pattern(s), new homes or
remodels should enhance the neighborhood
character. The stronger the existing
neighborhood pattern, the more important it is for
an applicant to reinforce and respect those
existing patterns.
d. Setbacks, heights, proportions, rooflines, and
architectural features of new construction should
complement the building orientation and
architectural style.
e. Street-facing façades on a corner lot should
develop a strong street presence by continuing
detailing and articulation found on the primary
building façade.
f. In neighborhoods with existing, smaller homes,
new homes should be designed with a greater
first floor area with additional setbacks at the
second story of the new structure.
g. Side yard setbacks, beyond the minimum
required, are encouraged when a new, two-story
home is proposed adjacent to an existing one-
story home.
h. Building footprints should vary within the required
setbacks in order to provide ample open space on
a property.
i. Construction of new homes and additions to
existing homes should consider the potential for
impacts on privacy of neighbors.
j. Structures should be positioned on a site to
minimize the blocking of sun access to actively
used outdoor areas on adjacent properties.
Site Planning Principles
d
c
d
d a
e
b
DESIGN GUIDELINES
CITY OF ARCADIA
SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES 10 Draft
June 2019
2. Forms and Mass
a. Lot Organization Diagram: Defining a series
of “Lot Areas” that inform the location, size,
and scale of building and site elements are
characterized in the siting and massing of
structures, depicted in the Figure below. The
Figure defines the boundaries of the following
Lot Areas:
• Primary Building Area: The Primary
Building Area is the central component
of the lot, with greater massing elements
allowed in this area.
• Secondary Building Area: The Secondary
Building Area surrounds the Primary
Building Area, where building wings and
accessory structures are located. Side
extensions or wings and dormers should
mimic roof pitch, however, recede in size
and location to the Primary Building Area
mass.
• Conditional Building Area: The area
surrounding the Secondary Building
Area, with the outer edges defined by
the minimum setbacks per the Arcadia
Development Code.
Lot Organization Diagram. This diagram
illustrates the described lot organization
definitions
Conditional Building Area
Secondary Building Area
Primary
Building Area
STREET
DESIGN GUIDELINES
CITY OF ARCADIA
SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES 11 Draft
June 2019
b. The primary mass of a home should be clearly
defined, street-facing, and setback from the
front property line in alignment with houses
immediately adjacent on both sides of the
property.
c. Wings or side extension masses should be
considerably shorter and narrower than the
primary mass of a home with a clear and
defined roof form. They should not be merely
a setback of a single, large massing element;
rather they should be sized, shaped, and
configured to respond to the interior functions of
the rooms which they contain.
d. The overuse of tacked-on building forms
attached to the primary mass of a home should
be avoided.
e. The building base should visually anchor the
building by appearing more massive than the
upper stories.
f. Cantilevered forms are generally discouraged,
particularly when they are used without
aesthetic justification.
g. Building elements that emphasize a structure’s
verticality are generally discouraged.
h. Homes located on corner lots should locate
building mass on both the primary and
secondary street frontages that address both
street faces.
i. Where a new second-story home or addition
is proposed within a predominately one-story
neighborhood, second-story massing should
be located to the rear or side of a home to
minimize the appearance of the second-
story.
j. Proposed height and bulk should respect
existing structures on neighboring properties
and not overwhelm them with
disproportionate size and scale.
Example using General Neighborhood Design Principles
Mass Diagram. This diagram portrays the general concept of a primary mass
and wing/side extension mass(es)
EXISTING SFD a NEW SFD (PREFERRED) NEW SFD (NOT PREFERRED)
e
c
d b
Main Mass
Wing Wing
x
DESIGN GUIDELINES
CITY OF ARCADIA
SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES 12 Draft
June 2019
Street and sidewalk edges, stone detailing,
and landscaping are continued to maintain
neighborhood frontage conditions
3. Frontage Conditions
a. The predominant treatment of street and
sidewalk edges, landscaping, or other design
techniques within an existing neighborhood
should be continued in the design of new
homes.
b. Homes should be located in a manner
compatible with the existing on-site relationship
to the street of the surrounding neighborhood.
c. Homes should not have significantly greater
height and bulk at the front of a property than
that of adjacent homes.
Recommended Frontage Conditions
b
a b
x
a
c
DESIGN GUIDELINES
CITY OF ARCADIA
SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES 13 Draft
June 2019
4. Garages and Driveways
a. The garage façade should be set back from
the front façade of the house to give visual
prominence to the house over the garage.
b. Garages placed in front of the main house
should be side-loaded with the highest level
of window and architectural detailing oriented
towards the street.
c. Where detached garages exist in a
neighborhood, new homes should consider
locating detached garages at the rear of the lot
in order to reduce the mass and scale of the
house along the street frontage.
d. Garage doors should be recessed from the
garage façade, to the extent feasible, to add
shadow and visual interest.
e. Driveways should be enhanced utilizing different
textures including, but not limited to, stamped
concrete, pavers, or grass-crete. Landscape
pockets should be provided adjacent to
buildings and walls or fencing along driveways.
f. Where circular driveways are proposed, they
should be integrated within the design of
the property and connect to the street in two
locations, aiding in defining a front yard area.
g. Driveways should be no wider than necessary
to provide for safe and efficient vehicular access
to the property in order to minimize the need for
excessive paving.
Garage Conditions Diagram
c
d
e
a
d b
f
e e
STREET
DESIGN GUIDELINES
CITY OF ARCADIA
SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES 14 Draft
June 2019
5. Architectural Styles
a. A clear and distinctive architectural style
should be selected. Refer to Appendix A for
typical character and detail treatments for
several architectural styles appropriate to
Arcadia. All design features, proportions, and
detailing should be consistent with the chosen
architectural style.
b. Floor plans should be designed to allow proper
placement and sizing of windows to complement
the chosen architectural style.
c. Consistency and/or complementary architectural
styles should be maintained within an existing
neighborhood context.
Architectural style is clearly defined and
executed based on the chosen style elements
and detailing
Design features, proportions, and detailing consistent with chosen architectural style
DESIGN GUIDELINES
CITY OF ARCADIA
SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES 15 Draft
June 2019
6. Height, Bulk, and Scale
a. Simple building massing and roof forms should be
utilized to maintain traditional architectural styles.
b. Complex floor plans should be avoided when they
lead to complicated building masses and roof
forms.
c. Symmetry in design can sometimes create a
home that is monumental and too massive. The
balanced effect created by symmetry can be
achieved with a more subtle design.
d. Second floor massing should be stepped back to
minimize impacts on adjacent neighbors and the
streetscape.
e. Eaves should be provided at the first-floor level
of a front façade to minimize the appearance of
a structure’s massing in predominantly one-story
neighborhoods, as compared to architectural styles
with two-story, blank front façades.
f. Proposed first and second floor plate heights
should consider existing plate heights established
within the immediate neighborhood.
g. Tall, long, unbroken, and blank front façades
should be avoided, especially when immediate
homes in the neighborhood have greater
articulation along front façades.
h. Monumental scaled forms (e.g. tower or turrets)
that contrast with the street presence of the
existing neighborhood should be minimized.
i. All façades facing a street should provide a sense
of human scale and be proportionate to the
pedestrian.
j. A structure’s size and bulk should complement the
predominant massing types of the neighborhood.
Simple massing and roof forms used to
strengthen traditional architecture styles
Second-story massing setback from front of
home to minimize overall appearance
Eaves provided at first-floor level of building’s
front façade minimize appearance of massing
DESIGN GUIDELINES
CITY OF ARCADIA
SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES 16 Draft
June 2019
7. Rooflines
a. Roof plans, overhangs, colors, and materials
should be consistent with the chosen
architectural style.
b. Roof forms and pitches on new homes should
be similar to those utilized on surrounding
homes.
c. Combining two different roof pitches is
discouraged.
d. Traditional roof forms such as gables, hips, and
dormers are encouraged. More severe roof
forms such as domes, steep chalet gables, and
flat roofs are generally discouraged.
e. Encouraged roof types include: concrete tile,
two-piece barrel tile, and class A
architectural dimension asphalt shingles.
f. Discouraged roof types include: built-up and
torch down roofs, rock roofing applied over an
approved built-up roof, corrugated metal and
fiberglass roofing panels, standing seam and
similar metal roofing panels, and gravel roofs.
g. Dormers, cross gables, and other decorative
roof features are encouraged provided that they
are an integral part of the overall roof design
and work within the building’s architectural style.
h. Gable dormers, single or multiple, should avoid
exceeding more than half of the total roof width.
Shed dormers may be wider.
i. Exposed rafter tails and/or other roof elements
are encouraged to express detail and rhythm.
j. Excessive use of corbels or brackets should be
avoided. If utilized, the placement and design
of corbels or brackets should be carefully
considered.
k. Bubble or dome-shaped skylights are
discouraged.
l. Similar roof forms and pitches found within the
immediate neighborhood should be incorporated
into new home designs.
EXISTING SFD NEW SFD (PREFERRED) NEW SFD (NOT PREFERRED)
Roofline Conditions
x
d
g b
f i a c
DESIGN GUIDELINES
CITY OF ARCADIA
SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES 17 Draft
June 2019
8. Entries
a. When entry porches are prevalent in the
immediate neighborhood of a project site,
similar entry types (e.g., projecting or under
eave) should be integrated into the front
façade design of new homes.
b. In general, large, formal entries that are out of
scale and proportion with the rest of the
home should be avoided.
c. Entry designs greater than one-story are
strongly discouraged.
d. Porches should be complementary of
the eave heights of adjacent homes.
e. Entry roofs should follow the same pitch as the
adjacent roofs. Flat roof porches are generally
discouraged.
f. Recessed depth of entry alcoves and projecting
depth of entry roofs should be large enough,
relative to the house, to provide the
appearance of shelter.
g. There should be no vertical or architectural
elements located above the entries that
emphasize the scale and massing of the
structure.
h. Front entry doors and decorative elements such
as roofs, moldings, columns, posts, lighting,
benches, and planters should be architecturally
compatible with the style of the house.
i. The primary entry, or front door, to a home
should be visible from and oriented to the street.
j. Primary entries to a residence should be of
similar orientation and scale to that of the
immediate neighborhood.
Entry and porch clearly defined through use of
single-story roof elements
Example of architecturally compatible entry
feature oriented to street
Entry designs greater than one-story are
discouraged
x
DESIGN GUIDELINES
CITY OF ARCADIA
SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES 18 Draft
June 2019
Windows should align to provide balance on
each building elevation
Windows and doors complementary of
architectural style
Windows offset on new home (right) to minimize
views onto neighboring property (left)
9. Windows and Doors
a. Building façades should be well-articulated
with window and door types, including material,
shape, and proportion, complementary of the
chosen architectural style.
b. Two-story-high windows tend to emphasize the
mass and verticality of a building and should
be avoided. This is especially true of two-story
window bays.
c. Windows should be articulated with detailing
such as sills, trim, brackets, shutters, or awnings
appropriate to the chosen architectural style.
d. Where appropriate to the architectural style,
windows should be recessed a minimum of
two (2) inches from the building wall to create
shadow and depth on a building façade.
e. Any shutters utilized in conjunction with windows
should be proportionate to the windows on
which they appear in order to appear functional.
f. Windows should be aligned, whether
horizontally or vertically, to provide balance on
each building elevation.
Second floor balconies incorporated into the massing of a home
(right) minimize intrusion into adjacent yards, while protruding
balconies (left) increase visibility of neighboring properties
x
DESIGN GUIDELINES
CITY OF ARCADIA
SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES 19 Draft
June 2019
g. Adequate spacing or “breathing room” should
be provided between door/window trim and
between wall edge/top of plate to enhance
overall project design.
h. Window and door changes on existing homes
should match the existing windows/doors for
architectural consistency. Alternatively, all
windows and/or doors should be replaced to
complement the architectural style of the house.
i. Windows and second-floor balconies/decks
should be located to minimize direct views
into neighboring residences and actively-used
outdoor spaces of neighboring properties.
10. Articulation
a. Architectural detailing and articulation should be
consistent with the chosen architectural style of
a project.
b. Large expanses of wall plane should be
avoided. Techniques for varying wall planes
include integration of vertical or horizontal
recesses and projections.
c. Building articulation should emphasize entries
such as by use of overhangs, porches, and
upgraded materials.
d. Articulation should provide interest through the
use of thoughtful integration of key elements
while avoiding a disordered appearance.
e. Decorative chimney caps are encouraged if
appropriate for the architectural style of the
building.
11. Facade Details
a. Façade treatment relevant to the house’s
architectural style should be carried throughout
the entire house with each façade and any
accessory structure.
Porches, materials, color, and detailing enhance
chosen architectural style
Brackets, window detailing, and material
changes enhance architectural style
Decorative features can add detail to a façade
and are encouraged
DESIGN GUIDELINES
CITY OF ARCADIA
SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES 20 Draft
June 2019
Use of architectural features including chimney,
moldings, and railing
Balanced use of architectural details
Example of a balanced colors and materials
palette with multiple colors and materials
involved
b. Architectural features such as decorative moldings,
windows, dormers, chimneys, balconies and
railings, and landscaped elements such as lattices,
can add detail to a façade and are encouraged
as long as they respect the scale and dignity of
traditional house design.
c. Detailing that make a residence appear too ornate
or monumental for its surroundings are strongly
discouraged. Such details may include quoins,
elaborate columns and pilasters, balusters, dentils,
and keystones.
d. Details with a false appearance, such as plant-on
window shutters and foam wall ornaments and
columns are discouraged.
e. Random and/or mixing of decorative or ornamental
detailing should be avoided, as the result is often a
chaotic visual appearance of architectural styles.
f. Surface detailing, such as score lines and color
changes, are not a sufficient material integration or
distinct scale and massing substitute. Large areas
of flat or blank walls are strongly discouraged.
g. Large or prominent front elevation balconies are
discouraged unless they are an integral part of the
building’s architectural style.
12. Colors and Materials
a. Colors and materials should be applied in an
authentic manner on all sides of the home in a
complementary manner in order to reinforce
the chosen architectural style.
b. Piecemeal embellishment and frequent
changes in colors and materials should be
avoided.
c. For new structures, repeating colors and
materials found in neighboring homes is
encouraged.
d. Buildings with large walls should have a subtle
base color. The base color on smaller
buildings, or those with more elaborate detail,
can use slightly stronger tones. In general, the
larger and simpler the house design, the more
subtle the color should be to reduce the
massiveness of large wall planes.
DESIGN GUIDELINES
CITY OF ARCADIA
SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES 21 Draft
June 2019
c. Earth tones are best-suited and are appropriate
for most of the architectural designs found in the
City. The use of strong or bright, unnatural colors,
including the salmon and pink hues and the bright
“white on white” color schemes for exterior stucco,
wood siding, trim doors and shutters should be
avoided. However, the use of contrasting, natural
colors can be appropriate for accent use, such as
for shutters and doors.
d. Appropriate materials for walls and façades
include stucco and wood siding, as well as more
decorative materials such as stone, tile, split-faced
block, and brick.
e. Stucco and plaster finishes should be consistent
with the architectural style of the structure. The use
of rough stucco finishes is discouraged.
f. Natural materials such as brick, stone, copper, etc.,
are preferred and should remain in their natural
state or color.
g. Stone and brick veneer with a false appearance
should be avoided.
h. Material changes should occur in conjunction
with changes in the plane of the façade to avoid a
“tacked-on” appearance.
i. Accent and trim elements should be differentiated
from the colors and materials of the primary
surface through color and/or material changes.
j. Roofing materials with glossy surfaces appear
unnatural and are strongly discouraged.
k. Existing natural clay tile roofs should be replaced
with the same material. For other repairs,
remodels, and additions, care should be taken in
the selection of material and installation to match
as closely as possible with the color of the “aged”
tiles.
l. Exposed gutters and downspouts, unless designed
as an outstanding architectural feature of the
overall theme, should be colored to match fascia or
wall material.
Natural stone material terminates at inside
corner, appearing integral to building structure
Earth tones are best suited for designs found in
the City
Accent and trim elements should be
differentiated from colors and materials of
primary surface
DESIGN GUIDELINES
CITY OF ARCADIA
SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES 22 Draft
June 2019
Exterior lighting architecturally compatible with
home and is shielded downward to minimize
spillover onto adjacent properties
Second story addition maintains stylistic and
detailed elements of original home
13. Accessory Lighting
a. Exterior lighting should be shielded and directed
downward or to a specific object(s) or areas to
avoid spillover onto adjacent properties.
b. Exterior light fixtures should be architecturally
compatible with the main structure.
c. Accent lighting should be utilized to illuminate
walkways, entries, and/or trees.
d. Any fixtures that are lighted upward should
employ the lowest wattage necessary to
minimize night sky impacts.
14. Additions, Alterations, and Accessory
Buildings/Structures
a. Additions to existing homes or new accessory
buildings/structures should be consistent with
the architectural style and detailing of a home
in terms of materials, finishes, colors, windows,
doors, siding, or roof tiles.
b. Piecemeal embellishment and frequent changes
in materials should be avoided. All façades of
a home should utilize the same vocabulary of
material and color.
c. Accessory buildings/structures should ensure
adherence to the requirements set forth within
the Arcadia Development Code for Single-
Family Residential Zones.
Building Addition Diagram. Second story addition continues architectural style and detailing
through the use of similar materials such as windows and shutters
DESIGN GUIDELINES
CITY OF ARCADIA
SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES 23 Draft
June 2019
d. When proposed, accessory buildings/structures
should be smaller in mass and height to the
main structure.
e. In order to enhance the privacy of neighboring
properties, landscaped setbacks should be
provided between any accessory buildings and
neighboring properties.
15. Hillside Properties
a. Residences proposed within hillside areas
should incorporate architecture, massing, scale,
form, color, roof materials, and landscaping that
reflect the natural hillside setting.
b. Homes and accessory buildings/structures
should not be located at the crest, ridgeline,
or top of a hill in order to maintain the visual
character of hillsides.
c. Siting of a new home uphill, near an
existing home, can create a silhouetting
effect that can potentially obstruct views
currently enjoyed by an uphill home. To
minimize potential view impacts on existing
homes, developments should incorporate
one or more of the following site planning
strategies:
• Tuck structures into hillsides;
• Locate structure on lower portion(s) of
a hillside lot;
• Terrace homes utilizing the slope. Use
split-level and multi-level plans on
hillside lots;
• Incorporate earth tone and natural
colors for the structure’s exterior
roofing materials, fencing, and walls to
blend into the natural terrain;
• Perimeter fencing on hillside properties
should be visually open (e.g., split
rail, picket, post and cable, etc.) to
maximize views.
Accessory structure visually secondary to
primary structure
Structure tucked into hillside to minimize
silhouetting on homes below
Structure sited to transition with hillside
DESIGN GUIDELINES
CITY OF ARCADIA
SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES 24 Draft
June 2019
d. To the maximum extent feasible, structures
should be sited to naturally transition with the
existing topography. Safe and sound grading,
drainage, and engineering principles should be
applied.
e. The proposed design of the structure on a
hillside, including minimal grading of the site,
should incorporate development techniques
which demonstrate sensitivity to the natural
terrain, such as split-level design or second
story step-backs from downhill slopes, reduced
building pads, and roof pitches that parallel
existing slopes.
f. Structures supported on open forms of
underpinnings, such as poles, should be
integrated with the under-structure systems of
the overall structure design. Areas under the
structure should be appropriately screened or
incorporated into the architectural massing in
a manner that minimizes the appearance of a
long, unbroken wall plane.
Hillside Conditions
Split-level design reduces need for intensive
grading of a site, maintaining natural terrain
x
g b
c a
d f e
DESIGN GUIDELINES
CITY OF ARCADIA
SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES 25 Draft
June 2019
16. Fences, Walls, Gates, and Hedges
a. Walls and fences for courtyards and the
perimeter of a property should be designed in a
style, material, and color that complement the
residence and the overall project design.
b. Fences and walls should be made of high-
quality materials, such as wood, brick, stone,
wrought iron, vinyl, or textured concrete block
(e.g. split-face, scored, slump stone). Wrought
iron fences should have iron posts and/or brick
or stone piers.
c. Bare precision block walls are generally
discouraged. Plain concrete block with a stucco
finish that match the architectural style of a
residence may be acceptable.
d. Where stone or brick walls are proposed, they
should remain in their natural character.
e. Fences and walls, when connected to a building
should complement one another in terms of
their material, color, and detailing. When fences
and walls are not connected to a building, they
should be integrated into the landscape as an
integral component of the design.
f. Front yard fencing and walls are discouraged
in neighborhoods where fencing/walls are not
already present.
g. In neighborhoods where front yard fencing and
walls are present, new front yard fencing/walls
should be open and simple and be consistent
with the neighborhood in terms of architectural
style of the home, level of detailing, etc.
h. Both sides of all perimeter fences or walls of a
property should be architecturally treated.
i. On lots with existing fences and walls, any
new fences/walls proposed should match or be
compatible with the existing fences/walls.
Front yard fencing and walls are compatible
with the materials and colors of the residence
enhancing the overall design aesthetic
Fences should be made of high-quality
materials
The use of landscaping to soften the visual
impact of walls and fences is encouraged when
visible from the public right of-way
DESIGN GUIDELINES
CITY OF ARCADIA
SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES 26 Draft
June 2019
On lots with existing walls or fences, new walls
or fences should be compatible with existing
Existing trees in good condition should be
preserved
The use of decorative hardscape materials are
encouraged
j. The use of clinging vines, shrubs, and trees to
soften the visual impact of walls and fences is
encouraged, especially when visible from the
public right-of-way.
k. Walls and fences should add visual interest and
prove to be an enhanced site feature.
17. Impervious Coverage and
Landscape Areas
a. Landscape design should be an integral
part of the overall project design and be
complementary to the architecture of a home.
The landscape design should also fit in with the
neighborhood and the surrounding environment.
b. Existing trees in good condition should be
preserved whenever possible.
c. To the extent feasible, applicants should
pursue use of drought-tolerant, and low water
using plantings within a projects landscape
design. Some integration of moderate water
using plantings may be acceptable as long
as a project water allowance remains under
applicable WELO requirements.
d. Low impact development (LID) strategies, such
as permeable paving, vegetated swales, and/or
infiltration areas, should be incorporated into the
design of all projects.
e. Landscaping should be utilized to define outdoor
spaces while also softening the transition of a
building’s appearance at the ground plane.
f. Trees and/or screening hedges should
be utilized along property lines to provide
screening and enhance privacy. However, such
landscaping should not obscure the entire view
of the building.
g. Design of front yard areas should provide a
balance between landscape and hardscape,
while also balancing both impervious and
permeable surfaces. Permeable hardscape
materials are encouraged.
DESIGN GUIDELINES
CITY OF ARCADIA
SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES 27 Draft
June 2019
h. The use of decorative hardscape materials,
such as brick, flagstone, interlocking pavers, tile,
stamped or colored concrete, and decomposed
granite, are encouraged.
i. In order to promote “walkable” neighborhoods,
a pedestrian path should be provided to the
front door connecting to the public sidewalk
and separate from the driveway. Where no
public sidewalk exists, pedestrian paths should
continue to the street.
j. Landscape planters lining driveways, walkways,
and property lines are encouraged.
k. Drought-tolerant and low water-using planting
design should utilize a variety of drought
resistant grasses, turf substitutes, or ground
covers that maintain the appearance of a
living, continuous planting area. Desert
landscapes or rock garden designs are
strongly discouraged.
l. Landscaping should be layered with low planting
used in the foreground proceeding back to the
tallest in the background.
m. Large planting sizes (36-inch box or greater),
shrubs (5-gallon and 15-gallon), and
groundcover are recommended to make a new
dwelling look established and soften the visual
impact of a build’s mass.
n. Planting designs should take into account the
long-term growth and expected maturity of
trees, shrubs, and ground cover landscaping on
a site. Plantings should also be grouped based
on similar water, nutrient, and sun needs to
ensure long-term growth and maturity.
Example of impervious surface integrated into a
driveway
Example of a drought-tolerant focused
landscape
Large planting sizes and groundcover
are recommended for new dwellings to
soften the visual impact of building’s mass
and give an established appearance
DESIGN GUIDELINES
CITY OF ARCADIA
SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES 28 Draft
June 2019
18. Sample Planting Palette
The following sample planting palette is provided to give homeowners, designers, and landscape architects an
idea of planting types appropriate to the City. Planting palettes should seek to conserve existing, established plant
materials when designing a new planting palette for a home, where feasible. Also, borrowing from the existing
planting theme from the surrounding neighborhood context of a home ensures the proposed landscape design fits
into the existing context.
Recommended plantings include the following; however additional planting selections that are appropriate to the City
are also encouraged:
(* denotes trees that need a large area for root growth) Canopy Trees:
• Cinnamomum camphora (Camphor Tree)*
• Pistachia chinensis (Chinese Pistache)
• Platanus acerifolia (London Plane Tree)*
• Platanus racemosa (California Sycamore)*
• Quercus agrifolia (Coast Live Oak)*
• Quercus engelmanni (Engelmann Oak)
• Tipuana tipu (Tipu Tree)
Specimen Trees:
• Agonis fluxuosa (Peppermint Tree)
Cinnamomum
camphora (Camphor
Tree)
Olea europaea (Olive
Tree)
Quercus agrifolia
(Coast Live Oak)
Lagerstroemia indica
(Crape Myrtle)
• Ginkgo biloba (Maidenhair Tree)
• Olea europaea (Olive Tree)
• Pinus eldarica (Afghan Pine)
• Pinus pinea (Italian Stone Pine)*
• Podocarpus gracilior (Fern Pine)
• Arbutus unedo (Strawberry Tree)
Flowering Trees:
• Albizia julibrissin ‘Rosa’ (Silk Tree)
• Cassia leptophylla (Gold Medallion Tree)
• Cercis occidentalis (Western Redbud)
• Jacaranda mimosifolia (Jacaranda)
• Koelreuteria bipinnata (Chinese Flame Tree)
• Koelreuteria paniculata (Goldenrain Tree)
• Lagerstroemia indica (Crape Myrtle)
DESIGN GUIDELINES
CITY OF ARCADIA
SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES 29 Draft
June 2019
• Magnolia grandiflora
• Pyrus kawakamii (Evergreen Pear)
• Prunus cerasifera (Flowering Plum)
• Tabebuia impetiginosa (Pink Trumpet Tree)
• Brachychilton acerifolius (Australian Flame Tree)
• Chilopsis linearis (Desert Willow)
• Cotinus coggyria (Smoke Tree)
• Parkinsonia x Desert Museum (Palo Verde Hybrid)
Palm Trees:
• Archontophoenix cunninghamiana (King Palm)
• Phoenix spp. (Date Palm)
• Washingtonia filifera (California Fan Palm)
• Brahae edulis (Guadalupe Palm)
• Syagrus romanzoffiana (Queen Palm)
Shrubs (*denotes value as screening plant):
• Prunus ilicifolia (Catalina Cherry)
• Azalea ssp. (Azalea)
• Arbutus unedo (Strawberry Tree)
• Alyogyne heugelii & cvs (Blue Hibiscus)
• Bamboo ssp.*
• Buddleia davidii (Butterfly Bush)
• Camellia ssp. (Camellia)*
• Carpenteria californica (Bush Anemone)
• Cassia splendida (Golden Wonder Senna)
• Ceanothus var. (Wild Lilac)
• Cistus purpureus (Orchid Rockrose)
• Cocculus laurifolius (Laurel Leaf)*
• Cotoneaster lacteus (Red Clusterberry)
• Echium fastuosum (Pride of Madeira)
• Escallonia ssp.*
• Euphorbia characias ‘Wulfenii’ (Mediterranean
Spurge)
• Euphorbia rigida (Silver Spurge)
• Grevillea ssp.*
Chilopsis linearis
(Desert Willow)
Washingtonia filifera
(California Fan Palm)
Buddleia davidii
(Butterfly Bush)
Archontophoenix
cunninghamiana (King
Palm)
Arbutus unedo
(Strawberry Tree)
Cocculus laurifolius
(Laurel Leaf)
DESIGN GUIDELINES
CITY OF ARCADIA
SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES 30 Draft
June 2019
Hibiscus rosa-sinensis
(Chinese Hibiscus)*
Salvia leucophylla
(Purple Sage)
Liriope muscari
(Big Blue Lily Turf)
Osmanthus fragrans
(Sweet Olive)
Cistus salviifolius
(Sageleaf Rockrose)
Trachelospermum
jasminoides (Star
Jasmine)
• Hibiscus rosa-sinensis (Chinese Hibiscus)*
• Lomandra longifolia (Mat Rush)
• Myrtus communis (True Myrtle)*
• Osmanthus fragrans (Sweet Olive)
• Podocarpus henkelii (Long-Leaf Yellow-Wood)
• Prunus caroliniana (Carolina Laurel Cherry)*
• Pyracantha ssp. (Firethorn)*
• Rosa ssp. (Rose)
• Salvia leucophylla (Purple Sage)
• Salvia mellifera (Black Sage)
• Salvia apiana (White Sage)
• Zauschneria californica (California Fuchsia)
Groundcovers:
• Arctostaphylos hookeri (Monterey Manzanita)
• Ceanothus griseus horizontalis (Carmel Creeper)
• Cistus salviifolius (Sageleaf Rockrose)
• Cotoneaster dammeri (Lowfast Bearberry)
• Dymondia margaretae (Silver Carpet)
• Lantana spp.
• Liriope muscari (Big Blue Lily Turf)
• Mahonia repens (Creeping Mahonia)
• Pelargonium peltatum (Ivy Geranium)
• Rosmarinus officinalis (Rosemary)
• Salvia chamaedryoides (Germander Sage)
• Salvia ‘Mrs Beard’ (Mrs. Beard Sage)
• Santolina chamaecyparissus (Lavender Cotton)
• Trachelospermum jasminoides (Star Jasmine)
• Verbena ssp.
Vines:
• Bougainvillea ssp.
• Distictis buccinatoria (Blood-Red Trumpet Vine)
• Distictis laxiflora (Vanilla Trumpet Vine)
DESIGN GUIDELINES
CITY OF ARCADIA
SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES 31 Draft
June 2019
• Distictis ‘Rivers’ (Royal Trumpet Vine)
• Jasminum polyanthum (Jasmine)
• Pyrostegia venusta (Flame Vine)
• Rosa cultivars (Rose)
• Thunbergia alata (Black-eyed Susan Vine)
Low Accent Plants:
• Agapanthus (Lily of the Nile)
• Agave spp.
• Aloe spp.
• Anigozanthos species & cultivars (Kangaroo Paw)
• Bulbine Frutescens
• Hemerocallis hybrids (Daylily)
• Iris spp.
• Kniphofia uvaria (Red-hot Poker)
• Lavandula spp. (Lavender)
• Penstemon spectabilis (Showy Penstemon)
• Salvia Greggii (Autumn Sage)
Ornamental Grass:
• Muhlenbergia rigens (Deer Grass)
• Muhlenbergia capillarus (Pink Muhly)
Pyrostegia venusta
(Flame Vine)
Thunbergia alata
(Black-eyed Susan Vine)
• Bouteloua gracillis (Blue Grama Grass)
• Festuca californica (California Fescue)
• Festuca idahoensis (Idahoe Fescue)
• Leymus condensatus ‘Canyon Prince’ (Canyon
Prince Wild Rye)
Bulbine Frutescens Kniphofia uvaria
(Red-hot Poker)
Muhlenbergia rigens
(Deer Grass)
Muhlenbergia capillarus
(Pink Muhly)
CITY OF ARCADIA
SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES Draft
June 2019
This page left intentionally blank.
CITY OF ARCADIA
SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES Draft
June 2019
APPENDIX - A
APPENDIX A - ARCHITECTURAL
STYLE GUIDE
Introduction
Arcadia, like most other California cities, has a mix of architectural styles within its residential
neighborhoods. Design feature consistency within traditional styles such as Ranch, American Colonial,
Spanish, etc., has served Arcadia well because it has enlivened the City with architectural variety while
maintaining a distinctly traditional neighborhood character.
In recognition of the value of architectural diversity, the City does not seek to dictate which individual
architectural styles are allowed, but rather promote an awareness of what makes different elements work
together to make a successful and universally recognized style. Strict adherence to a single architectural
style is not required; however, combining too many elements from several disparate styles often results
in an incoherent design and is strongly discouraged. Generally, the City recommends selecting a single
architectural style as a starting point in the design process. The overall architectural style should be
compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. The use of similar features, colors, and materials found in
nearby homes is encouraged.
Tiers of Architectural Review
Included below are three tiers representing the prominence of architectural styles found within neighbor-
hoods throughout the City. For example, in more traditional neighborhoods, Tier 1 architectural styles are
found to be prominent and most appropriate for new development. Whereas in more eclectic neighborhood s,
the architectural styles listed in Tier 1 through Tier 3 would be considered appropriate for new development.
Regardless of the architectural style proposed, applicants should refer to the following pages that list some
of the typical architectural styles found in and around Arcadia and their successful characteristics.
TIER 1
1. Traditional Ranch
2. Colonial/American Traditional
3. Spanish
TIER 2
4. Mediterranean
(Italianate,
Tuscan, etc.)
5. Craftsman
6. Prairie
TIER 3
7. French
8. Contemporary or
Modern
9. Tudor or Cape
Cod
CITY OF ARCADIA
SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES Draft
June 2019
APPENDIX - A
TRADITIONAL RANCH TIER 1
Traditional Ranch combines characteristics of other styles in the City’s guidelines. It has the straightforward
massing and detailing of the Tudor or Cottage style, along with the rustic materials of the Craftsman style.
Emphasis on the horizontal is important, and extension of the Traditional Ranch style to two stories dilutes
its distinction from the other aforementioned styles. Ranch style is particularly characteristic of Arcadia’s mid -
century boom years, creating a comfortable suburban setting surviving to the current day and influencing the
approach recommended for all styles.
TRADITIONAL RANCH
Form:
Simple, horizontal massing
Modest entry expression – roof or alcove
Broad one-story shape
Usually built low to the ground
Garage typically attached to main
facade
Roof:
Shallow pitched roof – gable and shed
Low-pitched without dormers
Open eave (rafter exposed or boxed)
Walls: Stucco or clapboard walls
Windows:
Wood window frames, or metal with recessed windows
Double-hung, casement, sliding and/or awning styles
Large picture window usually present
Details:
Simple molding profiles
Shutters
Decorative wrought iron
Simple, low masonry planters
Outdoor patios
Color: More contrast between roof and walls than between field and trim
CITY OF ARCADIA
SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES Draft
June 2019
APPENDIX - A
COLONIAL/AMERICAN TRADITIONAL TIER 1
Colonial or American Traditional style uses plain massing and fine detailing. Wood is used for the siding, and fine
millwork traditionally is used sparingly, but efficiently for expressing detailed elements. Modest scale is important
for detail work, including semicircular vents, window trim, window panes and muntins, and fascia boards with open
soffits. Simplicity is important in the roof form, principally gable or shed.
COLONIAL OR AMERICAN TRADITIONAL
Form: Simple form, at least for the primary part of the home
Roof:
Moderate to steep roofs – gable or shed
Compound roof pitch (gambrel) part of tradition
Detailed molding and cornice profiles
Walls: Shingle or clapboard walls
Windows:
Moderate to broad frames
Small panes
Double-hung sashes, usually with multi-pane glazing in one or both sashes
Frequently in adjacent pairs
Details:
Small, finely detailed fascia boards, vents, and other details
Details part of functional elements rather than applied
Color:
Usually pale walls; contrasting trim optional
Dark roofs
CITY OF ARCADIA
SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES Draft
June 2019
APPENDIX - A
SPANISH TIER 1
Spanish styles – Colonial, Mission Revival, and Monterey among other variants – emerged as the dominant style
in Southern California during the 1920s building boom. Its adaptability to different building programs has made it
a perennial favorite. The adaptability results from intentional design characteristics:
1) The use of large, simple massing components to achieve simplicity;
2) The discreet use of well-placed, well-designed, and well-executed details. When combined with the
simple massing, which would otherwise be dull, the details create an integrated design that is rich and
expressive. Pergolas and other garden structures are also used to complement and mitigate the overall
building mass.
SPANISH
Form:
Low mass moderates any two-story mass
Arches (deep)
Courtyards
Wide front balcony on Monterey variant
Arcades
Pergolas
Roof:
Barrel tile roofs – shed, hip, gable
Flat shingles or tiles on Monterey variant
Heavy exposed dark beams
Shallow to moderate slopes (4:12 to 6:12), usually with little to no eave overhang
Walls: Stucco walls
Windows: Recessed windows with minimal frames
Details: Decorative vents
Iron accents and balconies
Color: Pale walls customary
Roof may be light, medium, or dark
Brown or other rich trim color
CITY OF ARCADIA
SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES Draft
June 2019
APPENDIX - A
CRAFTSMAN TIER 2
The Craftsman style is a descendant of the Cottage Style and is particularly identified with California due to the
influence of the Greene brothers in Pasadena and Bernard Maybeck in the San Francisco region.
The rustic look of Craftsman architecture relies on a spacious exterior – great porches and overhangs – as well
as the use of stained wood, dark colors, and rustic supporting materials of river rock and rough brick. Massing
can be very simple on a small Craftsman, which will likely focus entirely on its front porch and gable, or much
more complex on a large Craftsman with variation of massing elements and angles.
CRAFTSMAN
Form:
Prominent porches (two sides common)
Large, often tapered, porch columns
Second floor set in from first
Complex massing on larger houses
Roof:
Composition or flat tile roofs
Shallow slopes – gable; some shed
Broad eave overhangs (12 to 42 inches)
Rafters usually exposed
Supported by tapered square columns
Carved rafter tails & brackets
Walls: Shingle or clapboard walls (stucco alternative)
Windows:
Broad wooden window frames
Fine division of panes, especially at top of window
Details: Decorative vents
Wood accents and balconies
Tapered posts
Clinker (rough) brick or river rock
Color: Dark warm colors
CITY OF ARCADIA
SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES Draft
June 2019
APPENDIX - A
PRAIRIE TIER 2
The Prairie style originated in Chicago, with examples concentrated in the early 20th century Chicago suburbs, most
noteworthy in part due to Frank Lloyd Wright’s work in this style. Spread by pattern books and popular magazines,
Prairie-style homes are of the few indigenous American styles.
Typically, two-stories, Prairie-style homes incorporate one-story porches or wings with low-pitched roofs and widely
overhanging eaves, usually boxed. Prairie-style houses typically integrate strong, masonry piers to support porch
roofs and emphasize horizontal lines. Additional detailing, such as tall casement windows, horizontal wall material
patterns, and broad flat chimneys, among others, further emphasizes the horizontal nature of this style.
PRAIRIE
Form:
Typically, two stories, with one-story porches/wings; porte-cocheres common
Cubic or otherwise geometric in form
Top half of upper story emphasized, often with different material/color
Roof:
Low-pitched with widely overhanging eaves, typically boxed
Gable or hipped roof, symmetrical or asymmetrical
Dormers common
Walls:
Contrasting wall materials or trim emphasizing the upper part of the upper story
Stucco, stone, or brick walls
Windows:
Casement windows, double-hung – often tall in shape
Geometric patterns of small-pane window glazing
Often continuous sill below
second-story windows
Details:
Façade detailing emphasizes horizontal lines
Decorative friezes or door surrounds with stylization
Massive, square porch supports with elaborations
Contrasting wood trim
feature
Color: Wide use of natural colors; contrasting darker trim
CITY OF ARCADIA
SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES Draft
June 2019
APPENDIX - A
MEDITERRANEAN (ITALIANATE, TUSCAN, ETC.) TIER 2
The Mediterranean style incorporates elements of the Spanish Revival, Italianate, and Tuscan styles, and began
to be incorporated frequently in the early 20th century in Southern California. Simple forms comprise the
symmetrical, primary façade of the home, often with a tower feature. Shallow to moderately sloping gable or hip
roofs, at times multi-level, are typical, with wide overhang eaves and decorative brackets. Walls are comprised
of stucco and/or stone, with windows varying in style – often with recesses and/or arched or curved detailing
(lintel) above. Additional detailing includes simple chimneys with elaborate spark arrestor, decorative vents, and
wrought iron accents and balconies.
MEDITERRANEAN (ITALIANATE, TUSCAN, ETC.)
Form:
Two-stories, rarely one-story
Simple forms comprise a symmetrical, primary façade
Tower feature at front façade common
Roof:
Shallow to moderate slopes – gable or hip
Multi-level roofs common eaves with
decorative
Moderate to widely overhanging
Tile roofing brackets beneath
Walls: • Stucco or stone walls
Windows:
Variety of window styles – typical styling includes tall, narrow windows
Recessed windows common, with or without frames
Commonly arched or curved detailing (lintel) above
Details:
Simple chimneys with more elaborate spark
arrestor detailing
Decorative vents
Wrought iron accents and
balconies
Raised terrace(s)
Color: Pale primary wall colors
Roof may be light, medium, or dark
• Brown or other rich trim
CITY OF ARCADIA
SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES Draft
June 2019
APPENDIX - A
FRENCH TIER 3
French design is distinct from the Classical style in its application of a few distinctive features. Most
characteristic are mansard roofs, which are always steeply pitched and either straight or curved. That curve is
normally concave, but convex curves may also be appropriate. Ornate metalwork is another hallmark, usually
applied in a linear manner as balcony balustrades, or as fascia boards along eaves, but in some instances used
structurally for columns. Used in moderation, French style works particularly well with Classical and Spanish
styles. In an eclectic neighborhood, it is the quality of the design rather than its feature set that allows wildly
divergent styles to work together well, and French design is within that mix.
FRENCH
Form:
Symmetrical entry
Terraced massing optional
Roof:
Flat tile roofs
Steep slopes – mansard dominant
Detailed parapets
Dormers common
Eaves commonly flared upward at roof-wall junction
Walls: Brick, stone, or stucco wall cladding, sometimes with false half-timbering
Windows: Recessed windows with minimal frames
Details:
Curved iron accents and balconies
Thin, detailed moldings
Decorative vents
Color: Pale walls and trim; any shade for roof
CITY OF ARCADIA
SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES Draft
June 2019
APPENDIX - A
CONTEMPORARY OR MODERN TIER 3
Modern houses tend to emphasize strong horizontal and vertical planes, express layering of planes and spaces,
and interweave interior and exterior spaces. Together, these design elements can produce compelling and
dramatic effects. When introduced into a neighborhood of more traditional styles, however, modern houses often
present too great a contrast or too little in terms of humanizing detail to fit the setting. Modern styles are
encouraged if they involve the best characteristics of the style – the layering and indoor/outdoor interweaving - as
well as avoiding the visual conflicts with traditional styles that too of ten occur. Landscape screening, an important
component of both modern architecture and harmonizing differing styles, will be taken into special account in
evaluating modern designs.
CONTEMPORARY OR MODERN
Form:
Simple, horizontal massing
Pronounced entry expression – roof or alcove
Deep layering of wall and window planes
Intermingling of exterior and interior space
Roof:
Flat roof, and/or shallow pitch – gable and shed
Roof beams exposed
Walls: Stucco or other smooth walls
Windows:
Wood window frames, or metal with recessed windows
Generally present in gable ends
Details:
Subtle colors except optional fine accent lines
Natural amenities (wood, stone, brick, or occasionally concrete block)
Color
Neutral colors, earth tones
Dark accents and exposed wood.
CITY OF ARCADIA
SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES Draft
June 2019
APPENDIX - A
TUDOR OR CAPE COD TIER 3
The Tudor or Cape Cod architectural styles are common throughout the United States. Both styles are character -
ized by steeply pitched roofs with side gables. One of the most distinctive characteristics of the Tudor style is the
decorative half-timbering, while the Cape Cod style is known to utilize shingle or clapboard siding. Straightforward
massing is also used in each, and details are simple but highly visible, such as wide window trim, plain fascia
boards, and simple exposed soffits.
TUDOR OR COTTAGE
Form:
Simple massing
Entry expression may be modest
Rustic tile roof
Roof:
Moderate to steep roof pitch
Shed or gable roof
Usually side-gabled (less commonly hipped or front gabled)
Walls: Shingle, clapboard, or rustic walls
Windows:
Pronounced surrounds, wide or narrow
Tall, usually in multiple groups, with multi-pane
glazing
Large, elaborate chimneys
Recessed windows
Simple exposed soffits
Details Minimal overhangs
Exposed wood corbel,
Wood beam trim
Siding
Color White and cream stucco
Brick or stone accent
Neutral and earth tones
CITY OF ARCADIA
SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES Draft
June 2019
APPENDIX - B
APPENDIX B - GLOSSARY OF TERMS
Accessory Building/Structure: A structure that is physically detached from, secondary and
incidental to, and commonly associated with the primary structure.
Alcove: A small area cut out of a larger mass, such as an entry porch.
Architectural Review Board (ARB): The body which conducts design review for each of the
five Homeowners Associations (HOA), recognized by City Council Resolution 6670.
Articulation: Use of different planes, surfaces, and forms to define an interesting and attractive
building or component of a building.
Asymmetry: Different on one side than on the other.
Balustrades: The combination of handrail, spindles (balusters), baserail and newels, which
together form a railing system that enclose one or both sides of a staircase.
Cantilever: A portion of a building extending out beyond its supporting wall or column.
Chamfer: A beveled corner which is formed in concrete work by placing a triangular or curved
insert in the corner of the form.
Clipped eaves: Eaves that have a minimal projection over the wall below.
Conditional Building Area: The area surrounding the Secondary Building Area, the outer
edges of which are defined by the minimum setbacks per the Arcadia Zoning Regulations, where
scaled-down wings and accessory structures may be located upon Architectural Review Board
approval.
Context: The character-defining surroundings of a site.
Cupola: A small structure, enclosed but with openings/fenestration, placed on the top of a
building’s roof.
Dormer: A structure with walls extending up from a roof, typically housing one or more windows.
Eave: The extension of a roof beyond an exterior wall, with no enclosed area underneath it.
Eclectic: Of mixed styles.
Elevation: A two-dimensional view of the front, side, or rear of a building or wall.
Façade: See Elevation.
Fascia: The board enclosing the edge of an eave.
CITY OF ARCADIA
SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES Draft
June 2019
APPENDIX - B
Gable Wall: A wall beneath the exposed end of one or more sloping roofs.
Guidelines: A set of recommendations that are applied as appropriate to each project or
development situation to meet certain objectives and achieve attractive and functional designs.
Hardscape & Impervious Surfaces: Pavement and other ground treatments other than plant
materials.
Integrity: Having enough consistency to be perceived as an “integral” unit.
Layering: Having different elements in different planes, forming layers, rather than a simple
wall.
Mansionization: Building a house too big for the size of the lot, or too ornate or formal in its
appearance.
Mass: The overall perceived size of a building, affected by not only its dimension, but also the
way its walls, roofs, and façade elements are designed.
Mission or Barrel Tile: A half-circular roof tile that is used alternatively face-up and face-down.
Modulation: Varying the depth and other characteristics of a wall or roof to improve its
appearance through breaking up its length and mass.
Monumentality: The appearance of trying to appear too important or imposing for its context.
Muntins: Narrow strips that form a division between window panes.
Nested Gables: One gable placed beneath another, usually off -center.
Overdesigned: Too ornate for its size or surroundings.
Pilaster: A column (structural or decorative) that is placed against a wall.
Pitch: The slope of a roof, expressed in inches of rise against 12 inches run (as in 4:12).
Porch: A prominent entry, including any roof above.
Porte-Cochere: A roofed structure, open on the sides, extending over a driveway.
Primary Building Area: The heart of the lot where permitted massing elements may be up to
the maximum size identified in these guidelines.
Primary Living Area (PLA): Primary Living Area (PLA) shall mean that portion of a residence to
be the main gathering and entertainment room used by residents and guests at the residence.
CITY OF ARCADIA
SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES Draft
June 2019
APPENDIX - B
Project: Physical work upon a property requiring City approval.
Quoins: Large squared stones, such as buttresses, set at the angles of a building; the external
corner of a building.
Ridgeline: A ridgeline is the top of a hill, ridge, or promontory, which drops or slopes down on at
least one side.
S-tile: A roof tile attempting to simulate the effect of mission or barrel tile with multiple curves.
Scale: Size relative to other portions of building, landscape, or surroundings, or to viewers.
Secondary Building Area: The area surrounding the Primary Building Area, where buildings
wings and accessory structures may be located
Shed Roof: A simple roof of a single slope.
Site Amenities: Benches, fountains, garden structures, and other features added to an open
space to en- hance its use and enjoyment.
Soffit: The underside of an eave.
Street Presence: The combination of building façades, public and private frontages, landscape,
trees, side- walks, streets, and the activity within these areas that generate the physical
character as viewed within the public right-of-way.
Substantial: Having enough visual depth to appear visually and structurally sound.
Surrounds: Ornamental projecting surfaces around a window and/or door.
Symmetry: The same on both sides.
Underdesigned: Too simple to offer interest to the viewer.
Wings: A secondary volume of a building where the primary volume is referred to as the main
mass.
DRAFT JUNE 2019
MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL
DESIGN GUIDELINES
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK.
CITY OF ARCADIA
MULTIFAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES Draft
June 2019 ii
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
CITY OF ARCADIA MULTIFAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES Draft
June 2019 iii
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
CITY COUNCIL
April Verlato, Mayor
Roger Chandler, Mayor Pro Tem
Peter Amundson, Council Member
Tom Beck, Council Member
Sho Tay, Council Member
PLANNING COMMISSION
Brad Thompson, Chair
Deborah Lewis, Vice Chair
Ken Chan, Commissioner
Zi Lin, Commissioner
Marilynne Wilander, Commissioner
SPECIAL THANKS
LEAD CITY STAFF
Jason Kruckeberg, Assistant City Manager/Development Services Director
Lisa Flores, Planning & Community Development Administrator
Jordan Chamberlin, Associate Planner
SUPPORTING CITY STAFF
Dominic Lazzaretto, City Manager
Luis Torrico, Senior Planner
Vanessa Quiroz, Associate Planner
CONSULTANT TO THE CITY
RRM Design Group
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK.
CCII TTYY OOFF AARRCCAA DDIIAA
MMUULLTTII FFAA MMIILLYY DDEESS II GGNN GGUUII DDEELL IINNEESS Draft
June 2019 iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CITY OF ARCADIA MULTIFAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES Draft
June 2019 v
TABLE OF CONTENTS
A. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 1
1. Introduction. ......................................................................................................... 2
2. How These Design Guidelines are Applied ......................................................... 2
3. How to Use These Design Guidelines ................................................................ 3
4. Applicability to Other City Documents ................................................................. 4
B. DESIGN GUIDELINES ................................................................................... 5
1. Site Planning and Building Placement ............................................................ 7
2. Accessibility and Street Scene ........................................................................ 8
3. Walls and Fences .............................................................................................. 9
4. Massing and Scale .......................................................................................... 10
5. Architectural Style ........................................................................................... 11
6. Rooflines .......................................................................................................... 11
7. Articulation ....................................................................................................... 12
8. Entries .............................................................................................................. 12
9. Windows and Doors ........................................................................................ 13
10. Colors and Materials ....................................................................................... 14
11. Private and Common Open Space ............................................................... 15
12. Landscaping .................................................................................................... 15
13. Amenities ......................................................................................................... 17
14. Equipment and Service Areas ....................................................................... 18
MULTIFAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES October 2018
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK.
v i CCII TTYY OOFF AARRCCAA DDIIA Draft
June 2019
CITY OF ARCADIA MULTIFAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES 1 Draft
June 2019
A. INTRODUCTION
CITY OF ARCADIA
MULTIFAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES 2 Draft
June 2019
1. Introduction
The City of Arcadia’s General Plan and
Development Code promotes high quality design
in buildings, landscape, signage, public realm, and
open space areas. These documents also identify
community design principles applicable to the
City’s ongoing redevelopment, including ‘Creating
Identifiable Places’, ‘Improving the Public Realm’,
and ‘Improving the Private Realm’. The General
Plan stresses the importance of quality in design
and the impact that site design and building form
has on enhancing the visual image of Arcadia and
establishing places that people enjoy. The design
guidelines contained within this document have
been written to reinforce these goals and objectives
and provides general guidelines for any addition,
remodel, or construction within any multi- family
land use district.
“Arcadia’s single-family and multifamily residential
neighborhoods have given the City its identity
as a Community of Homes. The City protects
and preserves the character and quality of its
neighborhoods by requiring harmonious design,
careful planning, and the integration of sustainable
principles”. Primary objectives associated with
developing a quality project within Arcadia include
designing within the established neighborhood
context and relationship to the street, promoting
pedestrian activity, minimizing appearance of
driveways and parking lots, ensuring high-quality
architecture, providing open spaces for public
and private gathering and pedestrian spaces, and
improving the streetscape environment. Multifamily
residential projects should respect and consider
the scale and character of adjacent neighborhoods
and developments through maintaining views,
appropriate building scale and orientation, proximity
to adjacent land uses, driveway locations, noise
and lighting mitigations, and landscape buffering.
2. How These Design
Guidelines are Applied
These Design Guidelines will be utilized during the
City’s development review process to encourage
the highest level of design quality while at the same
time providing the flexibility necessary to encourage
creativity on the part of an applicant in response
to existing site conditions. Each subsection of
the Design Guidelines contains design objectives
followed by applicable design guidelines that direct
users to desired design strategies for development
or redevelopment of their property. These objectives
seek to highlight the major factors affecting the
development of a particular land use while also
reinforcing direction provided by the General Plan
and Development Code.
Designers and developers are urged to become
familiar with these guidelines and to apply them
throughout the design process to assure that
the design, review, and permitting processes are
as efficient as possible. No claim can be made
that these guidelines encompass every possible
technique for achieving a high level of design
quality. It is important to note that the guidelines are
a minimum starting point for quality development
and the designer is encouraged to use their own
creativity and experience to improve upon the means
for realizing this highest level of quality design.
The guidelines do not seek to impose an overriding
architectural style, a limited color palette, or an
artificial design theme, but rather seek to promote
the positive design characteristics currently found
throughout the City.
INTRODUCTION
CITY OF ARCADIA MULTIFAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES 3 Draft
June 2019
3. How to Use These Design
Guidelines
Property owners, developers, architects, designers,
and contractors proposing a new development or
redevelopment within Arcadia should first review
the appropriate Development Code sections
governing their property. They should then proceed
to the Design Guidelines document applicable to
their property’s land use – whether Single-Family
Residential, Multifamily Residential, Commercial/
Mixed Use, or Industrial, as well as, Signage.
The goal of this document is to provide clear
and useful recommendations for the design,
construction, review, and approval of development
in Arcadia. The guidelines are intended as a
reference point for a common understanding of
the minimum qualitative design expectations. The
guidelines are offered as one way of achieving
attractive and functional projects that compare
favorably with established community standards. All
development shall comply with the spirit and intent
of the design guidelines presented.
The design guidelines may be interpreted with some
flexibility in the application to specific projects, as
not all design criteria may be appropriate for each
project. In some circumstances, one guideline
may be relaxed in order to accomplish another,
more important, guideline. The overall objective
is to ensure that the intent and spirit of the design
guidelines are followed and to attain the best
possible design within reason.
A building or project should be designed to conform
with a traditional and historically recognized
architectural style identified and supported by
selected building elements and articulation. In
addition, caution should be exercised when
considering architectural styles that have recently
become popular (i.e. “trendy”), but have not yet
stood the test of time. Historic styles that cannot
be faithfully replicated should be avoided. No single
architectural theme is being promoted, but rather
the emphasis is to promote variety. Many of the
styles and patterns shown in the following pictures
and graphic illustrations represent a concept of
recommended building elements and details as
opposed to a desired architectural character.
An essential goal of the General Plan and reinforced
by the design guidelines is to ensure neighborhood
compatibility. “No development exists in isolation.
Every act of construction affects and is affected by
its surroundings. Every development, therefore,
should be evaluated for its compatibility in terms of
use, scale, and aesthetics with the neighborhood
or district in which it is located. For small projects,
this area of influence may be considered to be as
small as to only include the buildings directly next
door. For large projects, one must consider entire
blocks or corridors”. In order to ensure quality
development within the City of Arcadia, these
Design Guidelines have been created to promote
new infill and redevelopment within the City while
ensuring compatibility with existing uses. Guidelines
that reinforce this objective are identified with a
neighborhood symbol ( ). Together, these
strategies reinforce the individual characteristics that
continue to make Arcadia a desirable place to live.
INTRODUCTION
CITY OF ARCADIA
MULTIFAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES 4 Draft
June 2019
In addition, the General Plan stresses the
importance of a sustainable future for Arcadia
that includes strategies to conserve and enhance
local resources and safeguard the environment.
In addition to providing strong examples of
good general design principles, this document
provides designers and builders with guidance on
“Sustainable” design. Conventional design and
construction methods can produce buildings that
contribute to excessive resource consumption, that
generate waste, and that are expensive to operate.
The guidelines contained within this document
reinforce this objective and promote site and
building design elements that utilize green building
practices and materials, preserve existing tree
canopy and native vegetation, promote pervious
surfaces, reduce or better distribute travel demand,
and encourages amenities that support transit and
other alternative forms of transportation, including
bicycling and walking. “Sustainability” principles
which can improve the environmental performance
of a project without forcing excessive costs on
builders or developers have been marked with the
symbol of a leaf ( ).
4. Applicability to Other City
Documents
This document is a tool for implementing the City
of Arcadia’s General Plan and Development Code.
While the Design Guidelines contained herein are
not intended to supersede the requirements of the
Development Code, applicants should not assume that
a project will be approved by merely adhering to the
City’s minimum zoning standards and development
regulations. Rather, these Design Guidelines provide
additional guidance to aide applicants in the design of
multi-family projects in order to ensure the high-quality
development desired by the City and the community.
CITY OF ARCADIA MULTIFAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES 5 Draft
June 2019
B. DESIGN GUIDELINES
CITY OF ARCADIA
MULTIFAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES 6 Draft
June 2019
DESIGN GUIDELINES
---
MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL
Design Guideline Objectives define Arcadia’s priorities and standards for future development. Many of
them have been derived from land use policies established in the General Plan. Development shall be
designed to adhere to the following objectives and the supporting guidelines provided.
Objective 1: Ensure new construction, additions, renovations are sensitive to neighborhood context and are
visually and functionally integrated and consistent in scale, massing and character with
structures in the surrounding neighborhood.
Objective 2: Provide interest to the “street scene” within the development and give as open a feel as
possible to the site.
Objective 3: Utilize high-quality design and detail to enhance the visual character, quality, and uniqueness of
the City’s neighborhoods and districts.
Objective 4: Ensure projects are built with quality materials that will physically endure and provide a positive
long-term living environment for residents.
Objective 5: Provide a variety of open spaces of different sizes and shapes that perform different functions
on the site, including contiguous areas large enough to be used for both active and passive
recreation.
Objective 6: Develop landscaping that is compatible with the City’s water efficient landscape ordinance.
Objective 7: Provide amenities that make a multifamily development a fully functional residential community.
Objective 8: Design equipment and service areas as an integral part of the project to be buffered or screened
from public view and neighboring properties
CITY OF ARCADIA MULTIFAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES 7 Draft
June 2019
DESIGN GUIDELINES
1. Site Planning and Building Placement
a. The location and configuration of new or
remodeled structures should be compatible
with neighboring sites and structures.
b. Natural amenities such as views, trees, and
similar features unique to the site should be
preserved and incorporated into
development proposals.
c. Multiple buildings in a single project are
preferred in order to create building clusters
that achieve a smaller scale and create
opportunities for plazas while preventing long
repetitive rows of buildings.
d. Potential privacy-sensitive areas on adjacent
parcels should be identified on the site plan,
and details should be provided on how the
proposed design has addressed them.
e. The design of buildings, driveways, loading
facilities, parking areas, signs, landscaping,
lighting, solar facilities, and other site
features should show adequate
consideration for the visual effect of the
development upon adjacent properties.
f. Buffers, such as landscaped setbacks,
should be integrated to protect surrounding
properties from noise, vibration, odor, and
other factors that may have an adverse
effect on the environment.
g. Windows should be offset from windows of
adjacent residences to prevent direct sight-
lines to windows and/or outdoor living
spaces, especially upper story windows that
look down into lower story windows or
actively used outdoor areas on adjacent
properties.
h. Decks and balconies should be located and
designed to minimize potential privacy-
sensitive issues on adjacent parcels and
within a development.
i. Decks and balconies should be incorporated
into the massing of the home, rather than
protruding out of the home, in order to
enhance privacy.
A combination of single- and multi-story
elements aides in variation of massing and
building height
Minimize unfiltered and direct views into
neighboring properties through window and
floor plan layout
Balconies oriented away from adjacent private
areas
CITY OF ARCADIA
MULTIFAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES 8 Draft
June 2019
DESIGN GUIDELINES
---
j. The use of large, blank walls as a method to
address privacy impacts is not acceptable.
k. Buildings, parking areas, and open space
should be arranged to minimize the use of
sound walls next to freeway, rail corridor,
arterial, and/or collector streets.
Articulation provides interest while helping to
separate units and improve privacy of balconies
Site layout featuring informal public space area
behind residential buildings
Buildings placed to create a “street scene”
along an interior drive aisle
2. Accessibility and Street Scene
a. Site layout and building placement should ensure
pedestrian connectivity and encourage activity
and/or informal interactions within public spaces.
b. Clear, safe pedestrian access should be
provided from parking areas to building
entrances with pedestrian walkways. Pedestrian
sidewalks and walkways should be parallel to
parking drive aisles minimizing the need for
pedestrians to cross parking drive aisles.
c. On-site pedestrian circulation systems should
connect to off-site public sidewalks, transit, and
neighboring properties.
d. Where applicable, alleys should be utilized to
provide access to parking and service areas.
e. Where appropriate, developments should
coordinate access/egress points with existing
median openings and driveways.
f. Entry driveways should be located away from
street intersections and adjacent property lines,
where feasible. Reciprocal access agreements
are strongly encouraged to minimize curb cuts
and enhance the pedestrian environment.
g. Primary vehicular entries into a multifamily
project should be through an entry driveway
using identifiable colored, textured, and/or
permeable paving treatments. Driveways
designed to “split” or that are located through
the center of a project are discouraged.
h. A clearly visible and well-designed project entry
should be created by incorporating low walls,
decorative paving, accent landscaping, and
signage to visually link the project site entry to
the building(s).
CITY OF ARCADIA MULTIFAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES 9 Draft
June 2019
DESIGN GUIDELINES
i. Semi-subterranean parking is strongly
discouraged when it results in a blank wall or
lack of pedestrian access at the street frontage.
j. Decorative paving materials and/or use of
colored sidewalk and pavement areas should
be utilized at pedestrian and/or automobile
contact zones to provide definition to
pedestrian space.
k. Where a parking garage is proposed, it should
be wrapped with residential units to allow for
continuation of the street scene.
l. Long, straight driveways and long motor courts
should be avoided using curvilinear
approaches, landscaping, or similar strategies.
m. Driveways should be enhanced using different
textures, including but not limited to, stamped
or scored concrete, pavers, or grass-crete.
n. Buildings and plazas should be oriented
towards the site’s primary public street and
placed at the property lines (back of sidewalk)
to define the street frontage and pedestrian
areas.
o. Landscape pockets should be provided along
driveways adjacent to buildings and walls,
where feasible.
p. Lighting, plantings, benches, public art,
trellises, and/or other elements should be
provided to enhance the pedestrian
environment.
3. Walls and Fences
a. Walls and fences should add visual interest and
enhance the site.
b. Walls and fences should be designed in a
style, material, and color that complements the
dwelling units and project design.
c. Both sides of all perimeter walls or fences
should be architecturally treated. Walls should
be finished and designed to complement the
surrounding development. Long expanses of
fence or wall surfaces should be offset and
architecturally designed to prevent monotony,
and landscape pockets should be provided.
Decorative paving utilized at pedestrian and
automobile contact zone
Primary entry defined by accent landscaping
and visible signage
Curvilinear driveway creates visual interest
along drive aisle
CITY OF ARCADIA
MULTIFAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES 10 Draft
June 2019
DESIGN GUIDELINES
---
Large building expanse broken into small-scale
units and building elements
Multifamily building featuring proper placement
and sizing of windows to complement
architectural style
Scale buildings in relation to and proportionate
to adjacent buildings
d. Materials such as wood, wrought iron, and
stone should be used. Natural colors that are
consistent with the architectural theme are
encouraged.
e. Stone and brick walls should remain the
natural color.
4. Massing and Scale
a. The size and design of new or remodeled
structures should be compatible with
neighboring sites and structures.
b. A clear, distinctive, and historically recognized
architectural style should be selected by the
applicant. All design features and detailing
should be balanced and proportionate while
maintaining consistency with the chosen
architectural style.
c. Four-sided architectural massing is required.
Emphasis should be placed on scale along
building frontage. All façades should be given
equal design consideration.
d. Large buildings should be broken into small-
scale units.
e. Efforts should be made to reduce the physical
mass of buildings. The upper levels of
buildings should be set back from the street
to make the building appear less imposing at
the pedestrian level.
f. A combination of single and multi-story
elements is encouraged to create variation in
massing and building heights.
g. Surface detailing, such as score lines and
colors changes, are not considered a
substitute for material integration and
distinctive massing and scale.
h. The height and bulk of proposed buildings
and structures on the site should be in scale
and in proportion with the height and bulk of
buildings and structures on surrounding sites
and should not visually dominate the site or
the neighborhood.
CITY OF ARCADIA MULTIFAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES 11 Draft
June 2019
DESIGN GUIDELINES
5. Architectural Style
a. A clear, distinctive, and historically recognized
architectural style should be selected by the
applicant.
b. Newly popularized or “trendy” architectural
styles should be avoided. Similarly, historic
architectural styles that cannot be
authentically reproduced should be avoided.
c. Architectural elements consistent with the
chosen style should be applied on all sides of
the building(s), not just the front facade.
d. Scale and massing should be appropriate to
the chosen architectural style.
e. Regardless of architectural style, all building
designs should contribute to and complement
the neighborhood character.
6. Rooflines
a. Roof forms should be consistent with the
architectural style of the building.
b. Special attention should be paid to the
articulation of the rooftop portions of buildings,
as long, unbroken, horizontal rooflines are not
acceptable. Utilizing design features such as
cross gables, roof decks and/or varying roof
forms is encouraged to minimize the physical
mass of a building.
c. Parapets should not appear “tacked on” and
should convey a sense of permanence. If the
interior side of a parapet is visible from the
pedestrian and/or motorist vantage point, it
should be designed to be like the exposed
façade. Parapets should generally be finished
with cornices and/or other horizontal
decoration depending on the chosen
architectural style of the building.
d. Rooftop equipment should be concealed from
view and/or integrated within the architecture
of the building.
e. Deep eaves, overhangs, canopies, and other
architectural features that provide shelter and
shade are encouraged.
Identify a clearly defined architectural style
Ensure roof forms and detailing are consistent
with architectural style
Columns, recessed, and/or projected building
elements should be encouraged
CITY OF ARCADIA
MULTIFAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES 12 Draft
June 2019
DESIGN GUIDELINES
---
Windows and detailing should be compatible
with the architectural style of the building and
feature quality molding and framing
Building entries promote pedestrian activity
Primary entries oriented toward common open
space
7. Articulation
a. Large expanses of flat building walls should
be avoided by providing sufficient building
articulation. Vertical and horizontal wall
articulation, including architectural
indentations and/or projections, should be
consistent with the chosen architectural style
and be integrated into the overall building
design to provide opportunity for shade,
shadow, and visual relief.
b. Unique architectural design features should be
utilized on buildings located at street corners,
such as taller building elements or
architectural details.
c. Exterior walls should include elements to
provide depth and character. Elements may
include windows, trellises, arcades, roof
overhangs, recessed or projected massing,
columns, balconies, wainscots, and/or
awnings.
d. Surface detailing, such as score lines and
colors changes, are not considered a
substitute for material integration.
8. Entries
a. Building entrances should be easily
identifiable and should face the street or a
courtyard to promote pedestrian activity and
continuation of building entries along
streetscape.
b. Entries should provide a sheltered area in
front of the primary door. Entry roofs should
follow the same pitch as adjacent roofs.
c. When located at a corner of a public street,
buildings should provide a prominent corner
entry.
d. Primary pedestrian entries to individual units
should be enhanced using colored, textured,
and/or unique paving materials appropriate to
the design of the building proposed.
e. Every building should contain at least one
pedestrian entry that does not require access
through a parking garage.
CITY OF ARCADIA MULTIFAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES 13 Draft
June 2019
DESIGN GUIDELINES
9. Windows and Doors
a. Window and door types, materials, shapes,
proportions, and detailing should be
compatible with the architectural style of the
building and should have quality molding and
framing.
b. Floor plans should be designed to allow
proper placement and sizing of windows to
complement the chosen architectural style.
Windows should be placed with adequate
spacing between window/door trim and wall
edges/top plates.
c. Garage doors facing the street are highly
discouraged.
d. Where appropriate to the architectural style,
window detailing, such as sills, trim, shutter
and/or awnings, should be utilized.
e. Shutters should be proportionate in size to
the windows to create the appearance of
functionality.
f. Awnings or prominent architectural features
over building entrances should be utilized to
provide a defined building entry that provides
a sheltered area and orients residents and
visitors.
g. Where appropriate to the architectural style,
windows and doors should be inset from the
walls a minimum of two (2) inches to create
shadow detailing and visual appeal.
h. Replacement windows should be compatible
to the overall building in style and material.
i. Preferred window materials include:
• Wood
• Composite clad
• Colored vinyl
• Coated metal
j. Anodized aluminum window material is
discouraged.
Window trims and sills improve overall building
design
Window articulation and detailing is achieved
through integrated sill, trim, and awning
Shutters should be proportionate in size to
windows and create the appearance of
functionality
CITY OF ARCADIA
MULTIFAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES 14 Draft
June 2019
DESIGN GUIDELINES
---
A balanced color palette with neutral base
colors
Wood, wrought iron, and stone balance building
elements
Brick finish wrapping the exterior corner
10. Colors and Materials
a. A balanced color palette should be kept using
the correct proportions between the neutral
“base colors” and the brighter “accent colors”
on each building. Buildings with large walls
should have a subtle, yet darker, base color.
b. Exposed metal flashing or trim should be
anodized or painted to blend with the exterior
colors of the building.
c. Appropriate materials for walls and façades
include, but are not limited to: stucco, stone,
tile, split-faced block, brick, and wood siding.
d. Facade treatment relevant to the architectural
style should be carried throughout the entire
building with each facade and any accessory
structure.
e. Architectural detailing should be included to
add visual interest to the facade, but overly
ornate detailing is discouraged.
f. Encouraged roof types include: concrete
tile, two-piece barrel tile, and class A asphalt
shingles (preferably architectural
dimension).
g. Discouraged roof types include: built-up and
torch down roofs, rock roofing applied over an
approved built-up roof, corrugated metal and
fiberglass roofing panels, standing seam and
similar metal roofing panels, and gravel roofs.
h. Finish materials should wrap the exterior
corner and terminate at the inside corner.
Such treatments will alleviate the appearance
of a “wallpaper” application and will give a
sense of permanence to a structure.
i. The design of accessory structures, fences,
and walls should be harmonious with the
principal building and other buildings on the
site and should utilize the same or similar
colors and materials.
j. Non-natural colors are discouraged.
CITY OF ARCADIA MULTIFAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES 15 Draft
June 2019
DESIGN GUIDELINES
11. Private and Common Open Space
a. Open space should focus on areas that
are usable to the residents and not merely
remainder parcels with marginal utility.
b. Residents of multi-family developments
should have safe, efficient, and convenient
access to usable open space, whether public
or private, for recreation and social activities.
Examples of amenities include common
rooms, pools, sports facilities, and gyms.
c. Where possible, connections should be
provided between neighborhood parks and
the larger community-wide park system, i.e.
jogging and hiking trails, bicycle paths, etc.
d. Bicycle and pedestrian pathways should
access a project at visually pleasing locations
rather than service areas.
e. Infrastructure elements such as stormwater
retention basins should be incorporated into
the overall open space plan.
f. Roof decks should be oriented toward the
street or onto common areas. Avoid upper-
story decks that overlook onto neighboring
properties. Where this cannot be avoided,
install screening devices such as solid railing
walls, frosted/opaque glass, or perimeter
planters.
12. Landscaping
a. Drought-tolerant landscape design should be
integrated into all projects.
b. Plant selection, soil preparation, planting
layout, and irrigation systems should balance
aesthetics with water conservation.
c. Low impact development (LID) strategies,
such as permeable paving, vegetated swales,
and/or infiltration areas, should be utilized.
d. Landscape elements such as sun shelters,
lighting, fountains, and paving materials are
encouraged.
Accessible linear park parallel to multifamily
housing contributes to livable, active
communities
Usable area of open space central to residential
units
Example of drought-tolerant landscaping
CITY OF ARCADIA
MULTIFAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES 16 Draft
June 2019
---
Landscaping incorporating a combination of
low, medium, and tall materials along walkway
Landscaping areas should be provided to
enhance pedestrian walkways
Trees provide a variety of texture, color, and
form to planting areas
e. Large landscaped areas should include:
• Pedestrian scaled lighting;
• Plant materials and structures that provide
shade, color, and contrast; and
• Seating opportunities such as raised planters.
f. Proposed projects should accommodate existing
mature trees, where feasible, and should provide
for their protection during construction.
g. New landscaping materials should be of varying
size and quality and designed to the scale of the
project.
h. Landscaping should contain a combination of low,
medium, and tall plant materials as appropriate.
i. Landscaping areas should be provided to enhance
pedestrian walkways.
j. Plant materials should be distributed throughout
the site.
k. Landscape design concepts should allow adequate
spacing of plants for mature growth and complete
coverage of planting areas.
l. When planting space is limited, the use of raised
planters, window boxes, potted plants, and climbing
vines should be utilized.
m. Where blank walls within a project cannot be
avoided, planters and/or clinging vines should be
used.
n. Planting should be used to soften or screen
parking areas, alleyways, and trash and service
areas.
o. Deciduous and evergreen trees should be used to
provide a variety of texture, color, and form in
planting areas.
p. Unique flowering trees, vines, shrubs, and accent
trees are encouraged as focal points within a
project planting palette.
q. Semi-permanent mulching, such as bark, is not an
acceptable groundcover solution and should not be
used as an alternative for ground cover or other
landscape material.
CITY OF ARCADIA MULTIFAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES 17 Draft
June 2019
13. Amenities
a. Outdoor spaces should include seating, trash
cans, bicycle racks, and/or other pedestrian
amenities.
b. Pedestrian spaces should have unique,
detailed, and well-articulated paving design.
Paving materials may include concrete or
brick pavers, tile, scored and textured
concrete, or stone that is consistent with
the design of the proposed building.
c. Furnishings should be coordinated with the
overall design or theme of a development.
d. Public art is encouraged that invites
participation and interaction, adds local
meaning, represents the community by
revealing its culture or history, and/or
captures or reinforces the unique character of
place.
e. The selection and placement of public art
should be part of the overall site design
process rather than as an afterthought to a
project.
f. Public art should be placed to avoid locations
where it may obstruct a pedestrian pathway,
create a traffic hazard, or compete with
another piece of art within the area.
g. Where proposed, bus stops and shelters
should be integrated into the project setting
through the incorporation of appropriately
designed and selected benches, lighting,
and/or landscaping to create a sense that
the bus stop “belongs to” the surrounding
neighborhood.
h. Light fixtures should be designed or selected
to be architecturally compatible with the main
structure or theme of the building.
i. The quality of light, level of light, and type of
bulb or source should be carefully selected
and placed so that lighting levels do not draw
attention to the glow or glare of the project
site, and timers and sensors should be
incorporated to avoid unnecessary lighting.
Unique, flowering shrubs used in conjunction
with project focal point
Outdoor spaces should include amenities such
as seating, BBQ pits, and trash cans
Bike racks and interactive art pieces promote
utility of common areas
CITY OF ARCADIA
MULTIFAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES 18 Draft
June 2019
Avoid glare onto adjacent properties
Trash enclosures located at rear of site and
concealed within building
Mechanical equipment appropriately screened
from view
14. Equipment and Service Areas
a. Service facilities should be located and
designed for easy access by service vehicles
and each individual tenant and should be
sited where they will not create a nuisance for
adjacent uses.
b. Trash collection areas should not intrude
into major lines of sight when viewed from
residential units or landscaped open areas
of the subject development or adjacent
properties.
c. Trash and recycling enclosures should be
screened with landscaping.
d. The trash and recycling enclosure should
be consistent with the design of the project
and the building. Wall materials and details
that are architecturally compatible to the
building design should be incorporated so
that similar or the same materials are used
on the enclosure as the surrounding
buildings.
e. A pedestrian entrance to the trash and
recycling enclosure should be provided so
that the large access gates do not have to be
opened as often.
f. All mechanical equipment on the site should
be appropriately screened from view.
g. Utility facilities should be placed
underground, where feasible.
h. All backflow prevention devices should be
screened from public view per the standards
set forth in the Development Services
Department and integrated into the site plan
in a way that does not detract from the
overall appearance of the building(s).
i. Community mailboxes should be designed to
be compatible with the building colors and
materials of the main structure.
DRAFT JUNE 2019
COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE
DESIGN GUIDELINES
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK.
CITY OF ARCADIA
COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE DESIGN GUIDELINES
Draft
June 2019 ii
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
CITY COUNCIL
April Verlato, Mayor
Roger Chandler, Mayor Pro Tem
Peter Amundson, Council Member
Tom Beck, Council Member
Sho Tay, Council Member
PLANNING COMMISSION
Brad Thompson, Chair
Deborah Lewis, Vice Chair
Ken Chan, Commissioner
Zi Lin, Commissioner
Marilynne Wilander, Commissioner
SPECIAL THANKS
LEAD CITY STAFF
Jason Kruckeberg, Assistant City Manager/Development Services Director
Lisa Flores, Planning & Community Development Administrator
Jordan Chamberlin, Associate Planner
SUPPORTING CITY STAFF
Dominic Lazzaretto, City Manager
Luis Torrico, Senior Planner
Vanessa Quiroz, Associate Planner
CONSULTANT TO THE CITY
RRM Design Group
CITY OF ARCADIA
COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE DESIGN GUIDELINES iii
Draft
June 2019
CITY OF ARCADIA
COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE DESIGN GUIDELINES
This page left intentionally blank.
iv
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
CITY OF ARCADIA
COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE DESIGN GUIDELINES Draft
January 2019
v
TABLE OF CONTENTS
A. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 1
1. Introduction. ................................................................................................................ 2
2. How These Design Guidelines are Applied ................................................................. 2
3. How to Use These Design Guidelines ......................................................................... 2
4. Applicability to Other City Documents ......................................................................... 4
B. DESIGN GUIDELINES ............................................................................................ 5
I. Commercial Design Guidelines .................................................................................. 7
1. Site Planning and Building Placement ................................................................ 7
2. Public and Private Open Spaces ........................................................................ 8
3. Pedestrian and Vehicular Access ....................................................................... 9
4. Massing and Scale ............................................................................................ 10
II. Mixed Use Design Guidelines ................................................................................... 11
1. Site Planning and Building Placement ............................................................... 11
2. Public and Private Open Spaces ....................................................................... 14
3. Pedestrian and Vehicular Access ....................................................................... 15
4. Massing and Scale ............................................................................................ 16
5. Neighborhood Context and Compatibility........................................................... 17
III. Guidelines Applicable to Both Commercial and Mixed Use Development…...…..18
1. Architectural Style ............................................................................................. 18
2. Awnings ............................................................................................................ 18
3. Rooflines ........................................................................................................... 19
4. Articulation ........................................................................................................ 20
5. Windows and Doors .......................................................................................... 20
6. Colors and Materials ......................................................................................... 21
7. Landscaping ...................................................................................................... 22
8. Equipment and Service Areas ........................................................................... 23
9. Site Furnishing .................................................................................................. 24
10. Lighting ............................................................................................................. 25
11. Public Art ........................................................................................................... 25
CITY OF ARCADIA
COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE DESIGN GUIDELINES Draft
June 2019
vi
0
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK.
CITY OF ARCADIA
COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE DESIGN GUIDELINES vii Draft
June 2019
A. INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION
CITY OF ARCADIA
COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE DESIGN GUIDELINES 2 Draft
June 2019
1. Introduction
The City of Arcadia’s General Plan and
Development Code promotes high quality design
in buildings, landscape, signage, public realm, and
open space areas. These documents also identify
community design principles applicable to the
City’s ongoing redevelopment, including ‘‘Creating
Identifiable Places,’’ ‘‘Improving the Public Realm,’’
and ‘Improving the Private Realm.’’ The General
Plan stresses the importance of quality in design
and the impact that site design and building form
has on enhancing the visual image of Arcadia and
establishing places that people enjoy. The design
guidelines contained within this document have
been written to reinforce these goals and objectives
and provide general guidelines for any addition,
remodel, or construction requiring a building permit
within any commercial or mixed use land use
district.
Primary objectives associated with developing a
quality project within Arcadia include designing
within the established neighborhood context and
relationship to the street, promoting pedestrian
activity, ensuring high-quality architecture, providing
public gathering and open spaces, and improving
the streetscape environment.
2. How These Design
Guidelines are Applied
These Design Guidelines will be utilized during the
City’s development review process to encourage
the highest level of design quality while at the same
time providing the flexibility necessary to encourage
creativity on the part of an applicant in response
to existing site conditions. Each subsection of
the Design Guidelines contains design objectives
followed by applicable design guidelines that direct
users to desired design strategies for development
or redevelopment of their property. These objectives
seek to highlight the major factors affecting the
development of a particular land use while also
reinforcing direction provided by the General Plan
and Development Code.
Designers and developers are urged to become
familiar with these guidelines and to apply them
throughout the design process to assure that
the design, review, and permitting processes are
as efficient as possible. No claim can be made
that these guidelines encompass every possible
technique for achieving a high level of design
quality. It is important to note that the guidelines are
a minimum starting point for quality development
and the designer is encouraged to use their own
creativity and experience to improve upon the
means for realizing this highest level of quality
design. The guidelines do not seek to impose an
overriding architectural style, a limited color palette,
or an artificial design theme, but rather seek to
promote the positive design characteristics currently
found throughout the City.
3. How to Use These Design
Guidelines
Property owners, developers, architects, designers,
and contractors proposing a new development or
redevelopment within Arcadia should first review
the appropriate Development Code sections
governing their property. They should then proceed
to the Design Guidelines document applicable to
their property’s land use – whether Single-Family
Residential, Multifamily Residential, Commercial/
Mixed Use, or Industrial, as well as, Signage.
The goal of this document is to provide clear
and useful recommendations for the design,
construction, review, and approval of development
in Arcadia. The guidelines are intended as a
reference point for a common understanding of
the minimum qualitative design expectations. The
CITY OF ARCADIA
COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE DESIGN GUIDELINES 3 Draft
June 2019
guidelines are offered as one way of achieving
attractive and functional projects that compare
favorably with established community standards. All
development shall comply with the spirit and intent
of the design guidelines presented.
The design guidelines may be interpreted with some
flexibility in the application to specific projects, as
not all design criteria may be appropriate for each
project. In some circumstances, one guideline
may be relaxed in order to accomplish another,
more important, guideline. The overall objective
is to ensure that the intent and spirit of the design
guidelines are followed and to attain the best
possible design within reason.
A building or project should be designed to conform
with a traditional and historically recognized
architectural style identified and supported by
selected building elements and articulation. In
addition, caution should be exercised when
considering architectural styles that have recently
become popular (i.e. “trendy”), but have not yet
stood the test of time. Historic styles that cannot
be faithfully replicated should be avoided. No
single architectural theme is being promoted, but
rather the emphasis is compatibility. Many of the
styles and patterns shown in the following pictures
and graphic illustrations represent a concept of
recommended building elements and details as
opposed to a desired architectural character.
An essential goal of the General Plan and reinforced
by the design guidelines is to ensure neighborhood
compatibility. “No development exists in isolation.
Every act of construction affects and is affected by
its surroundings. Every development, therefore,
should be evaluated for its compatibility in terms of
use, scale, and aesthetics with the neighborhood
or district in which it is located. For small projects,
this area of influence may be considered to be as
small as to only include the buildings directly next
door. For large projects, one must consider entire
blocks or corridors”. In order to ensure quality
development within the City of Arcadia, these
Design Guidelines have been created to promote
new infill and redevelopment within the City while
ensuring compatibility with existing uses. Guidelines
that reinforce this objective are identified with
a neighborhood symbol ( ). Together, these
strategies reinforce the individual characteristics
that continue to make Arcadia a desirable place to
live.
In addition, the General Plan stresses the
importance of a sustainable future for Arcadia
that includes strategies to conserve and enhance
local resources and safeguard the environment.
In addition to providing strong examples of
good general design principles, this document
provides designers and builders with guidance on
“Sustainable” design. Conventional design and
construction methods can produce buildings that
contribute to excessive resource consumption,
that generate waste, and that are expensive to
operate. The guidelines contained within this
document reinforce this objective and promote
site and building design elements that utilize
green building practices and materials, preserve
existing tree canopy and native vegetation, promote
pervious surfaces, reduce or better distribute
travel demand, encourage amenities that support
transit and other alternative forms of transportation,
including bicycling and walking, and support mixed-
use development that provides opportunities for
employment and commercial uses adjacent to
residential units. “Sustainability” principles, which
can improve the environmental performance of a
project without forcing excessive costs on builders
or developers, have been marked with the symbol
of a leaf ( ).
INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION
CITY OF ARCADIA
COMMERCIAL AND MIXED-USE DESIGN GUIDELINES 4 Draft
June 2019
Mixed use development may include
commercial uses, but utilizes a more
compact and efficient use of land by
combining residential and commercial
or office uses together. Benefits of
mixed use developments can include a
reduction in automobile dependence,
preservation of open space, revitalization
and enhancement of specific City areas,
increased economic development, and
the provision of alternate housing options.
This document contains three sections:
one pertaining to commercial projects, the
second pertaining to mixed use projects,
and the third pertaining to both commercial
and mixed use projects. Of the first two,
applicants should utilize the section
relevant to their project. The third section
is applicable to all commercial and mixed-
use projects. For example, an applicant
proposing a mixed use development should
adhere to Section 2, Mixed Use Design
Guidelines and Section 3, Guidelines
Applicable to Both Commercial and Mixed-
Use Development.
4. Applicability to Other
City Documents
This document is a tool for implementing
the City of Arcadia’s General Plan and
Development Code. While the Design
Guidelines contained herein are not
intended to supersede the requirements of
the Development Code, applicants should
not assume that a project will be approved
by merely adhering to the City’s minimum
zoning standards and development
regulations. Rather, these Design
Guidelines and the City Center Design
Guidelines provide additional guidance to
aide applicants in the design of commercial
and mixed use projects in order to ensure
the high-quality development desired by the
City and the community.
CITY OF ARCADIA
COMMERCIAL AND MIXED-USE DESIGN GUIDELINES 5 Draft
June 2019
B. DESIGN GUIDELINES
DESIGN GUIDELINES
CITY OF ARCADIA
COMMERCIAL AND MIXED-USE DESIGN GUIDELINES 6 Draft
June 2019
COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE
Design Guideline Objectives define Arcadia’s priorities and standards for future development. Many of them
have been derived from land use policies established in the General Plan. Development shall be designed
to adhere to the following objectives and the supporting guidelines provided.
Objective 1: Ensure new construction, additions, renovations, and infill developments are sensitive to
neighborhood context, building form, scale and colors and materials
Objective 2: Create a streetscape environment to promote pedestrian activity and an enhanced
pedestrian experience
Objective 3: Utilize high quality architecture to create an attractive and cohesive “face” of the City
within Commercial Corridors and Mixed Use Districts
Objective 4: Encourage design approaches that create a cohesive, v ibrant look and that minimize the
appearance of expansive parking lots on major commercial corridors
Objective 5: Design public areas to create outdoor amenities and improve the pedestrian experience
Objective 6: Develop landscaping that is compatible with the City’s water efficient landscape
ordinance
Objective 7: Design equipment and service areas as an integral part of the project to be buffered or
screened from public view and neighboring properties
Objective 8: Design mixed use commercial and residential development to take advantage of easy
access to transit, to provide employment opportunities, and to provide a complementary
mix of uses that support and encourage pedestrian activity
DESIGN GUIDELINES
CITY OF ARCADIA
COMMERCIAL AND MIXED-USE DESIGN GUIDELINES 7 Draft
June 2019
I. COMMERCIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES
Commercial projects shall adhere to the spirit and
intent of the guidelines presented within this Section,
Commercial Design Guidelines, as well as Section 3,
Guidelines Applicable to Both Commercial and Mixed Use
Development.
1. Site Planning and Building Placement
a. Site planning should emphasize appropriate street
and sidewalk widths, block lengths, relationships of
buildings to streets, and use of public spaces.
b. Proposed projects should accommodate existing
mature trees, where feasible, and should provide
for their protection during construction.
c. Provide continuous storefront windows and many
defined entrances for ground floor commercial uses
adjacent to the street and sidewalk.
d. Buildings should be sited at or near the front
property line with entrances located to enliven the
street and parking located behind.
e. Pedestrian access through perimeter walls and
planters should be provided to allow for convenient
and logical on-site and off-site circulation.
f. Where a parking garage is proposed, it should be
wrapped with retail and/or other commercial uses
at the ground level to allow for continuation of the
street scene.
g. Off-street parking and loading facilities should
function efficiently with minimal obstruction of traffic
on surrounding streets and alleys.
h. Bicycle parking should be provided within parking
areas, and racks should be included within the
project furnishings palette.
i. Parking lot areas, including aisles and/or spaces,
should be separated from buildings by a raised
walkway and landscape strip.
j. Trees should be incorporated into parking lots to
soften the impact of large expanses of paving and
to provide shade for parked vehicles. Use of
accent trees located at parking lot entries and at
the end of parking aisles is encouraged.
Storefront windows and an inviting pedestrian
environment
Planter break for pedestrian circulation
Parking garage wrapped with retail
DESIGN GUIDELINES
CITY OF ARCADIA
COMMERCIAL AND MIXED-USE DESIGN GUIDELINES 8 Draft
June 2019
Landscaped planter separating parking
Loading area located to the rear of the building
Outdoor seating located in conjunction with
plaza space
k. Planters within parking lot areas should be of
sufficient width, including the curb areas, to support
the long-term growth and stability of trees and
landscaping proposed
l. Service or loading areas should be located at the
rear of the building and screened from public view.
m. Where proposed, bus stops and shelters should
be integrated into the project setting through
the incorporation of appropriately designed and
selected benches, lighting, and/or landscaping to
create a sense that the bus stop “belongs to” the
surrounding neighborhood.
2. Public and Private Open Spaces
a. Public spaces should be designed to meet the
following criteria:
• Provision of areas for formal or informal social
interactions;
• Provision of areas for passive or active uses;
• Creation of a sense of place;
• Integration with and/or create pedestrian
linkages; and
• Location and design for year-round use through
the provision of awnings, wind breaks, sun
shade, and/or landscaping.
b. Public space may include, but is not limited to,
outdoor plazas, outdoor dining areas, and/or
landscaped areas designed for active or passive
use.
c. Public spaces should be clearly recognizable as
accessible and usable by the public.
d. Publicly accessible outdoor spaces should include
seating, trash cans, bicycle racks, and/or other
pedestrian amenities.
e. Site layout, building, and open space design should
encourage activity in public spaces. Public spaces
should be located adjacent to the commercial
component of the development that can be
converted for joint use with outdoor dining and
pedestrian access.
DESIGN GUIDELINES
CITY OF ARCADIA
COMMERCIAL AND MIXED-USE DESIGN GUIDELINES 9 Draft
June 2019
f. Pedestrian spaces should have unique, detailed,
and well-articulated paving design. Paving materials
may include concrete or brick pavers, tile, scored
and textured concrete, or stone that is consistent
with the design of the proposed building.
g. Furnishings and lighting should be coordinated with
the overall design or theme of the development.
h. Site furnishings should not be used for any type of
advertising purposes.
i. Public art is encouraged in public spaces, and
can help create a sense of place. Art should
be authentic, participatory or interactive, and
meaningful to the community.
j. The selection and placement of public art should be
part of the overall site design process, rather than
as an afterthought to a project.
k. Public art should be located in conjunction with
other site features, such as a plaza or architectural
feature and an integral part of site development,
rather than a stand-alone, separate object.
l. Public art should be placed so as to avoid locations
where it may obstruct a pedestrian pathway, create
a traffic hazard, or compete with another piece of
art within the area.
3. Pedestrian and Vehicular Access
a. Site layout and building placement should ensure
pedestrian connectivity and encourage activity and/
or informal interactions within public spaces.
b. Clear, safe, pedestrian access should be provided
from parking areas to building entrances with
pedestrian walkways. Pedestrian sidewalks and
walkways should be parallel to parking drive aisles,
minimizing the need for pedestrians to cross
parking drive aisles.
c. The main pedestrian access point to the building
should be located along the street-facing facade.
d. On-site pedestrian circulation systems should
connect to off-site public sidewalks, transit, and
neighboring properties.
Site furnishings to complement the building’s
architecture
Public art as part of a commercial development
Pedestrian path through parking area
DESIGN GUIDELINES
CITY OF ARCADIA
COMMERCIAL AND MIXED-USE DESIGN GUIDELINES 10 Draft
June 2019
Lighting and paving to enhance the pedestrian
environment
Maximize transparency at ground level
When located at a corner, buildings should
provide a prominent corner entry
e. Lighting, plantings, benches, public art, trellises,
and/or other elements should be provided to
enhance the pedestrian environment.
f. Entry drives should be located away from street
intersections. Reciprocal access agreements are
strongly encouraged to minimize curb cuts and
enhance the pedestrian environment.
g. Decorative paving materials and/or use of colored
sidewalk and pavement areas should be utilized
at pedestrian and/or automobile contact zones to
provide definition to pedestrian space.
h. Ridesharing, wayfinding and/or loading areas
should be incorporated into the project
design.
i. Pedestrian connections through the
development, as an alternative to street
connections are strongly encouraged.
4. Massing and Scale
a. The height and bulk of proposed buildings and
structures on the site should be sensitive to
the scale and in proportion with the height and
bulk of buildings and structures on surrounding
sites and should not visually dominate the site
or the neighborhood.
b. Multiple buildings in a single large project are
preferable to massive, full block developments.
c. Create building clusters that achieve a smaller scale
and create opportunities for plazas while preventing
long repetitive rows of buildings.
d. Breaking up a building expanse into smaller scale
units, such as 25 to 50-foot modules is highly
encouraged.
e. All façades should be given equal design
consideration.
f. Large blank walls adjacent to the street frontages
are strongly discouraged.
g. Windows should be provided along at least 30
percent of the building’s ground floor facade.
h. Buildings located on corners should have defined
and articulated corner entrances.
DESIGN GUIDELINES
CITY OF ARCADIA
COMMERCIAL AND MIXED-USE DESIGN GUIDELINES 11 Draft
June 2019
i. The vertical plane of the building facade should
be broken up with a high level of articulation (e.g.,
entry or window features, projecting or recessed
elements, transparent storefronts, identifiable
retail spaces, and awning and entrance canopies),
especially at ground level.
j. A combination of single and multi-story elements
is encouraged to create variation in massing and
building heights.
k. Awnings, street level windows, roof overhangs,
moldings, fixtures, and/or other detailing should be
used to provide a sense of human scale.
l. Surface detailing, such as score lines and color
changes, are not considered a substitute for
material integration and distinctive massing and
scale.
m. The ground level façade for a multi-level structure
should have a distinct look from the façade of the
floor levels above. This can be achieved through
the use of different architectural elements, such
as building material or trim accent, cornice lines,
awnings, projecting or recessed elements, window
treatments and sizes, and/or paint colors.
n. For projects over two stories in height, portions of
the upper stories should be recessed from the front
façade to reduce the overall massing of the building
at the pedestrian level.
II. MIXED USE
Mixed use projects shall adhere to the spirit and
intent of the guidelines presented within this Section,
Mixed Use Design Guidelines, as well as Section 3,
Guidelines Applicable to Both Commercial and Mixed-
Use Development.
1. Site Planning and Building Placement
a. Active commercial uses, including retail, restaurant,
and personal services should be located on the
ground floor fronting the sidewalk.
b. Private amenities, such as plazas and open space
should be located in the interior of the site or
otherwise away from the street.
Appearance of multiple buildings creates
appearance of smaller scale that may better fit
into existing neighborhood
Varied building elements to create visual
interest with human-scaled features
Active commercial uses located on the ground
floor
DESIGN GUIDELINES
CITY OF ARCADIA
COMMERCIAL AND MIXED-USE DESIGN GUIDELINES 12 Draft
June 2019
Mixed use open space located on the interior of
the site
Site layout creating a pedestrian-friendly street
scene
Recessed balconies provide privacy
c. Site planning should emphasize appropriate street
and sidewalk widths, block lengths, relationships of
buildings to streets, and use of public spaces.
d. Entries that face the primary street may be directly
connected to the street’s sidewalks. Secondary and
residential entrances can be connected to interior
courtyards and parking lots.
e. Both private and common outdoor spaces should
be incorporated in mixed use developments.
Private outdoor courtyard areas for residents only
are encouraged. Plazas for public use should also
be provided in areas adjacent to commercial uses.
f. Common areas should be centrally located and
designed as courtyards or outdoor rooms. Outdoor
furnishings, amenities, public gathering spaces,
trees, and trellises for shade should be provided.
g. Potential privacy-sensitive areas on adjacent
parcels should be identified on the site plan,
and details should be provided on how the
proposed design has addressed them.
h. Projects located directly adjacent to
residential dwellings should carefully
consider floor plan layout and window
placement to minimize unfiltered and direct
views into neighboring properties.
i. Windows on walls adjacent to a neighboring
residence should be offset to prevent direct
sight-lines to adjacent windows and/or
outdoor living spaces, especially upper story
windows that look down into lower story
windows or actively used outdoor areas on
neighboring properties.
j. Decks and balconies should be located and
designed so as to minimize potential privacy-
sensitive issues.
k. The use of large, blank walls as a method to
address privacy impacts is not acceptable.
l. A clearly visible and well-designed project entry
should be created using low walls, paving, accent
landscaping, and signage to visually link the project
site entry to the building(s).
m. Proposed projects should accommodate existing
mature trees, where feasible, and should provide
for their protection during construction.
DESIGN GUIDELINES
CITY OF ARCADIA
COMMERCIAL AND MIXED-USE DESIGN GUIDELINES 13 Draft
June 2019
n. Lighting, plantings, benches, public art, trellises,
and/or other elements should be provided to
enhance the environment for residents and visitors.
o. When multiple uses are proposed in the same
building, there should be separate, clearly
identifiable, and convenient entrances for each use.
p. Site layout and building placement should ensure
pedestrian connectivity and encourage activity and/
or informal interactions within public spaces.
q. On-site pedestrian circulation systems should
connect to off-site public sidewalks, transit, and
neighboring properties.
r. Continuous storefront windows and individual
entrances should be provided for ground floor
commercial uses adjacent to the street and
sidewalk.
s. A dedicated parking area should be provided
for residential use and should be clearly
distinguished from spaces provided for other
uses.
t. Parking should be concentrated in areas
behind buildings and away from the street to
the extent feasible.
u. Off-street parking and loading facilities
should function efficiently with minimal
obstruction of traffic on surrounding streets
and alleys.
v. Bicycle parking should be provided within
parking areas, and racks should be included
within the project furnishings palette.
w. Parking lot areas, including aisles and/or
spaces, should be separated from buildings
by a raised walkway and landscape strip.
x. Trees should be incorporated into parking
lots to soften the impact of large expanses of
paving and to provide shade for parked
vehicles. Use of accent trees located at
parking lot entries and at the end of parking
aisles is encouraged.
y. Planters within parking lot areas should be of
sufficient width, including the curb areas, to
support the long-term growth and stability of
trees and landscaping proposed
Provide separate entries for multiple uses in
one building
Continuous storefront windows
Trees, landscaping, and pathway through
parking area
DESIGN GUIDELINES
CITY OF ARCADIA
COMMERCIAL AND MIXED-USE DESIGN GUIDELINES 14 Draft
June 2019
Parking garage wrapped with retail at ground
level
Service facilities should be screened and
oriented to the rear of building
Mechanical equipment screened with
architecturally compatible materials and wall
design
z. Where proposed, bus stops and shelters should
be integrated into the project setting through the
incorporation of appropriately designed and selected
benches, lighting, and/or landscaping to create a
sense that the bus stop “belongs to” the surrounding
neighborhood.
aa. Where a parking garage is proposed, it should be
wrapped with retail and/or other commercial uses at
the ground level to allow for continuation of the street
scene.
bb. Service or loading areas should be located at the
rear of the building and away from residential units.
cc. Service areas for non-residential uses should not be
located near residential units or near parking areas
for residential units.
dd. All buildings should be sited to reduce visual,
auditory, odorous, and other conflicts between
residential uses and other uses on the site.
ee. Landscaping should be utilized with other features to
reduce potential visual, light, and glare conflicts.
ff. Noise-generating equipment, such as refrigeration
units, HVAC units, and exhaust fans should be
located and screened from residential uses. Noise-
reducing screens and insulation may be required.
gg. Commercial uses with residential units attached
should provide ventilation systems to prevent odors
from adversely affecting residential units.
hh. Commercial uses should avoid parking lot and
security lighting that would impact residential areas.
2. Public and Private Open Spaces
a. Common public spaces should be designed to meet
the following criteria:
• Provision of areas for formal or informal social
interactions;
• Provision of areas for passive or active uses;
• Creation of a sense of place;
• Integration with and/or create pedestrian linkages;
and
• Location and design for year-round use through
the provision of awnings, wind breaks, sun shade,
and/or landscaping.
DESIGN GUIDELINES
CITY OF ARCADIA
COMMERCIAL AND MIXED-USE DESIGN GUIDELINES 15 Draft
June 2019
b. Public space may include, but is not limited to,
outdoor plazas, outdoor dining areas, and/or
landscaped areas designed for active or passive
use.
c. Common open space should be clearly
recognizable as accessible and usable by the
public.
d. Publicly accessible outdoor spaces should include
seating, trash cans, bicycle racks, and/or other
pedestrian amenities.
e. Site layout, building, and open space design should
encourage activity in public spaces. Public spaces
should be located adjacent to the commercial
component of the development that can be
converted for joint use with outdoor dining and
pedestrian access.
f. Residential development in mixed use projects
should incorporate private open space for residents.
g. Pedestrian spaces should have unique, detailed,
and well-articulated paving design. Paving materials
may include concrete or brick pavers, tile, scored
and textured concrete, or stone that is consistent
with the design of the proposed building.
h. Furnishings and lighting should be coordinated with
the overall design or theme of the development.
i. Site furnishings should not be used for any type of
advertising purposes.
3. Pedestrian and Vehicular Access
a. Site layout and building placement should ensure
pedestrian connectivity and encourage activity
and/ or informal interactions within public spaces.
b. Clear, safe, pedestrian access should be
provided from parking areas to building
entrances with pedestrian walkways. Pedestrian
sidewalks and walkways should be parallel to
parking drive aisles, minimizing the need for
pedestrians to cross parking drive aisles.
c. The main pedestrian access point to the
building should be located along the street-
facing facade.
Common pedestrian path with amenities
Common open space with lighting, seating, and
landscaping
Pedestrian-friendly outdoor plaza
DESIGN GUIDELINES
CITY OF ARCADIA
COMMERCIAL AND MIXED-USE DESIGN GUIDELINES 16 Draft
June 2019
Public art to help create a sense of place
Bus stop with benches, bicycle racks, and art
component
Pedestrian access with landscaping
d. On-site pedestrian circulation systems should
connect to off-site public sidewalks, transit, and
neighboring properties.
e. Entry drives should be located away from street
intersections. Reciprocal access agreements are
strongly encouraged to minimize curb cuts and
enhance the pedestrian environment.
f. Decorative paving materials and/or use of colored
sidewalk and pavement areas should be utilized
at pedestrian and/or automobile contact zones to
provide definition to pedestrian space.
g. Ridesharing, wayfinding and/or loading areas
should be incorporated into the project design.
h. Pedestrian connections may be made to and
through the development as an alternative to
street connections, if feasible.
i. Pedestrian connections through buildings should
be thoughtfully designed. Pedestrian connections
should include amenities similar to furnishings
found along a typical sidewalk.
4. Massing and Scale
a. The height and bulk of proposed buildings and
structures on the site should be in scale and in
proportion with the height and bulk of buildings
and structures on surrounding sites and should not
visually dominate the site or the neighborhood.
b. Multiple buildings in a single project are preferable
to monolithic buildings to achieve a smaller scale.
Buildings should be clustered and organized to
provide usable open space. Long, repetitive rows
of buildings should be avoided.
c. Breaking up a building expanse into smaller scale
units, such as 25 to 50-foot modules is highly
encouraged.
d. All façades should be given equal design
consideration.
e. Large blank walls adjacent to the street frontages
are strongly discouraged.
DESIGN GUIDELINES
CITY OF ARCADIA
COMMERCIAL AND MIXED-USE DESIGN GUIDELINES 17 Draft
June 2019
f. The vertical plane of the building facade should
be broken up with a high level of articulation (e.g.,
entry or window features, projecting or recessed
elements, transparent storefronts, identifiable
retail spaces, and awning and entrance canopies),
especially at ground level.
g. Buildings located on corners should have defined
and articulated corner entrances.
h. Windows should be provided along at least 30
percent of the building’s ground floor façade.
i. A combination of single and multi-story elements is
encouraged to create variation in massing and
building heights.
j. Awnings, street level windows, roof overhangs,
moldings, fixtures, and/or other detailing should be
incorporated to provide a sense of human scale.
k. Surface detailing, such as score lines and color
changes, are not considered a substitute for
material integration and distinctive massing and
scale.
l. The ground level façade for a multi-level structure
should have a distinct look from the façade of the
floor levels above. This can be achieved through
the use of different architectural elements, such
as building material or trim accent, cornice lines,
awnings, projecting or recessed elements, window
treatments and sizes, and/or paint colors.
m. For projects over two stories in height, portions of
the upper stories should be recessed from the front
façade to reduce the overall massing of the building
at the pedestrian level.
5. Neighborhood Context and Compatibility
a. Natural amenities such as views and
natural features should be preserved to the
extent feasible.
b. The design of buildings, driveways, loading
facilities, parking areas, signs, landscaping,
lighting, solar facilities, and other site
features should show adequate
consideration for the visual effect of the
development upon adjacent properties.
1.
Decorative accent paving at intersection and
crosswalk
Prominent corner entry
Appearance of multiple buildings creates
appearance of smaller scale
DESIGN GUIDELINES
CITY OF ARCADIA
COMMERCIAL AND MIXED-USE DESIGN GUIDELINES 18 Draft
June 2019
Infill development compatible with surrounding
buildings
Multi-story building providing transition to
adjacent one-story building
Awning designed to coordinate with building
architecture
c. The location and configuration of new or
remodeled structures should be designed to
limit negative impacts on neighboring sites,
buildings, and structures as feasible.
d. The design of buildings, driveways, loading
facilities, parking areas, signs, landscaping,
lighting, solar facilities, and other site features
should show adequate consideration for the
visual effect of the development upon
adjacent properties.
e. Building scale and architectural massing of
new projects should incorporate elements for
a reasonable transition to adjacent existing,
or future developments.
III. GUIDELINES APPLICABLE TO BOTH
COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE
1. Architectural Style
a. A clear, distinctive, and historically recognized
architectural style should be selected by the
applicant.
b. Newly popularized or “trendy” architectural styles
should be carefully evaluated for neighborhood
compatibility. Similarly, historic architectural styles
that cannot be authentically reproduced should be
avoided.
c. Architectural elements consistent with the
chosen style should be applied on all sides of the
building(s), not just the front facade.
d. Scale and massing should be appropriate to the
chosen architectural style.
e. Regardless of architectural style, all building
designs should contribute to and complement the
neighborhood character.
2. Awnings
a. Awnings are encouraged and should be designed
to coordinate with the architectural style of a
building.
b. Awnings and signage should be
appropriately located so as to clearly define
building entries in order to orient pedestrians.
DESIGN GUIDELINES
CITY OF ARCADIA
COMMERCIAL AND MIXED-USE DESIGN GUIDELINES 19 Draft
June 2019
c. Awnings should not be wrapped around buildings
in continuous bands, and long and continuous
treatments should be avoided. Awnings should only
be located in conjunction with doors, windows, and/
or other openings.
d. Awnings should be of a durable, commercial grade
fabric, canvas, or similar materials having a matte
finish. Glossy, shiny plastic, or similar awning
materials are discouraged.
e. Awning frames and supports should be painted or
coated metal or other non-corroding materials.
f. Translucent or “backlit” awnings which allow light
to pass through are strongly discouraged. Lighting
should be located directly above the awning and
directed downward.
g. Aluminum awnings or “brow” canopies generally
detract from the character of a building and are
discouraged.
h. When several businesses are located in one
building, awnings of the same color and similar
style and size should be used.
3. Rooflines
a. Multiple roof lines are strongly encouraged, and roof
forms should be consistent with the architectural
style of a building.
b. Special attention should be paid to the articulation
of the roof ridge, eave, or parapet line of buildings
as long, unbroken, horizontal rooflines are not
acceptable. Utilize design features such as roof
decks and/or varying roof forms to minimize the
physical mass of a building.
c. Rooflines should be broken at intervals by loggias,
changes in height, or stepbacks to reinforce typical
building pattern.
d. Parapets should not appear “tacked on” and should
convey a sense of permanence. If the interior side
of a parapet is visible from the pedestrian and/or
motorist vantage point, it should be designed to be
similar to the exposed façade.
e. Parapets should generally be finished with cornices
and/or other horizontal decoration depending on
the chosen architectural style of the building.
Durable awnings
Multiple rooflines are encouraged
Roof deck oriented toward the street
DESIGN GUIDELINES
CITY OF ARCADIA
COMMERCIAL AND MIXED-USE DESIGN GUIDELINES 20 Draft
June 2019
Trellis, trim, materials and color used for
articulation
Articulation and overhang provided at the entry
Material change at the base of the building
f. Deep eaves, overhangs, canopies, and/or other
architectural features that provide shelter and
shade and visual interest are encouraged.
g. Rooftop equipment should be concealed from view
and/or integrated within the architecture of the
building.
h. Roof decks should be oriented toward the street or
common areas. Avoid upper-story decks that
overlook onto neighboring properties. Where this
cannot be avoided, install screening devices such
as solid railing walls, frosted/opaque glass, or
perimeter planters.
4. Articulation
a. Large expanses of flat building walls should be
avoided by providing sufficient building articulation.
Vertical and horizontal wall articulation, including
architectural indentations and/or projections, should
be consistent with the chosen architectural style
and be integrated into the overall building design so
as to provide opportunity for shade, shadow, and
visual relief.
b. Unique architectural design features should be
utilized on buildings located at street corners, such
as taller building elements or architectural details.
c. Exterior walls should include elements to provide
depth and character. Elements may include
windows, trellises, arcades, roof overhangs,
recessed or projected massing, columns, balconies,
wainscots, and/or awnings.
d. Detailing of exterior walls at the ground level
should provide an appropriate transition from the
ground plane to the building elevation. Utilize reveal
patterns, changes in materials, building pop-outs,
columns, and recessed areas to create shadow
patterns and depth on the wall surfaces.
5. Windows and Doors
a. Windows and door types, materials, shapes,
proportions, and detailing should be designed to
coordinate with the chosen architectural style and
design of a building.
DESIGN GUIDELINES
CITY OF ARCADIA
COMMERCIAL AND MIXED-USE DESIGN GUIDELINES 21 Draft
June 2019
b. Doors and windows should be coordinated together
and should have quality molding and framing.
Powder- coated colors are encouraged instead of
using typical anodized aluminum.
c. Display windows should face onto the sidewalk to
create a heightened visual interest at the pedestrian
level.
d. Ground floor windows should remain unobstructed
to provide maximum transparency (e.g. windows)
on first floor facades.
e. Reflective, mirrored, or opaque glass is strongly
discouraged.
f. When windows are added or changed on a building,
the new design should be compatible with the
fenestration of the existing building.
g. Introducing or changing the location or size
of windows or other openings that alter the
architectural character of the original building
should be avoided.
6. Colors and Materials
a. A balanced color palette should be kept using the
correct proportions between the neutral “base
colors” and the brighter “accent colors” on each
building. Buildings with large walls should have a
subtle, yet darker, base color.
b. Exposed metal flashing or trim should be
anodized or painted to blend with the exterior
colors of the building.
c. Appropriate materials for building facades
include, but are not limited to; plaster, stucco,
stone, tile, brick, and/or wood siding.
d. Discouraged building materials include: highly
reflective materials, unpainted or smooth
monolithic concrete, T-111 siding, speed
(interlocking) or precision block or non-textured
block, and metal.
e. Exposed concrete masonry units and split-faced
masonry units with integral color and texture may
be used, but is discouraged as a primary building
material.
Lighting to enhance building features
and walkways
Window and door design coordinated with
quality molding and framing
Street windows providing a human-scale
DESIGN GUIDELINES
CITY OF ARCADIA
COMMERCIAL AND MIXED-USE DESIGN GUIDELINES 22 Draft
June 2019
Finish stone material wraps and terminates at
inside corner
Example of drought tolerant planting
arrangement
Plants selected and planting layout balance the
aesthetics of a project’s landscape design with
the need to conserve water
f. Finish materials should wrap the exterior corner
and terminate at the inside corner. Such treatments
will alleviate the appearance of a “wall paper”
application and will give a sense of permanence to
a structure.
g. Corporate architecture and generic architectural
designs are strongly discouraged.
h. Garish, non-harmonious, or out-of-character colors
should not be used on any building face or roof.
7. Landscaping
a. Drought-tolerant landscaping should be integrated
into all projects.
b. Plant selection, soil preparation, planting layout,
and irrigation systems should be selected so as to
balance the aesthetics of a project’s landscape
design with the need to conserve water.
c. Low water use plantings are encouraged. Some
integration of moderate water use plantings may
be acceptable so long as the project water
allowance remains under applicable Water
Efficient Landscape Ordinance (WELO)
requirements.
d. Low Impact Development (LID) strategies, such as
permeable paving, vegetated swales, and/or
infiltration areas should be incorporated into the
design of all projects, including landscaped areas.
e. Areas not occupied by buildings, parking, or
commercial activities should be permanently
landscaped with live plant materials. Hardscape
may be used where pedestrian activity occurs and
in other areas where such an application is
considered appropriate.
f. Landscaping should be developed to contain a
combination of low, medium, and tall plant
materials as appropriate.
g. Landscape design concepts should reflect
adequate spacing of plants that allows for mature
growth and complete coverage of planting areas in
a reasonable amount of time.
h. When planting space is limited, the use of raised
planters, window boxes, potted plants, and
climbing vines should be considered within the
overall landscape design.
DESIGN GUIDELINES
CITY OF ARCADIA
COMMERCIAL AND MIXED-USE DESIGN GUIDELINES 23 Draft
June 2019
i. Unique flowering trees, vines, shrubs, and accent
trees are encouraged as focal points within a
project planting palette.
j. Where blank walls within a project cannot be
avoided, planters and/or clinging vines should be
used to soften these wall surfaces. The planting
area adjacent to blank walls should be continuous,
and the plantings chosen should grow to an
appropriate height to minimize the visibility of blank
wall space.
k. Plantings should be used to soften or screen
parking areas, alleyways, as well as trash and
service areas.
l. Semi-permanent mulching, such as bark, is not an
acceptable groundcover solution and should not
be used as an alternative for ground cover or other
landscape materials.
3. Equipment and Service Areas
a. All mechanical equipment on the site should be
appropriately screened from view. Large vent
stacks and similar features should be avoided
and, if essential, screened from view or painted so
as to be non-reflective and compatible with
building colors.
b. Utility facilities should be placed underground,
where feasible.
c. All backflow prevention devices should be
screened from public view per the standards
set forth in the Development Services
Department and integrated into the site plan
in a way that does not detract from the overall
appearance of the building(s).
d. The design of accessory structures should be
harmonious with the principal building and
other buildings on the site, and the same
building materials should be used to match
the primary buildings on site.
e. Loading areas and associated loading
activities should be located to the rear of
buildings and screened from view so as to not
be visible from a public street.
Vegetated swales integrated into a project
landscape design
Unique flowering plantings at project focal
points
Ensure adequate plant spacing for long-term
growth and maturity
DESIGN GUIDELINES
CITY OF ARCADIA
COMMERCIAL AND MIXED-USE DESIGN GUIDELINES 24 Draft
June 2019
Screened wall
Screened loading area
Trash enclosure located at rear of site and out
of major site lines
f. Both sides of all perimeter walls or fences should
be architecturally treated. Walls should be finished
and designed to complement the surrounding
development. Long expanses of fence or wall
surfaces should be off- set and architecturally
designed to prevent monotony, and landscape
pockets should be provided.
g. Service facilities should be located and designed
for easy access by service vehicles and each
individual tenant and should be sited where they
will not create a nuisance for adjacent uses.
h. Where applicable, alleys should be utilized to
provide access to service entrances, loading
docks, and refuse collection areas.
i. Where buildings are adjacent to residential
properties, loading and delivery areas should be
located away from the adjacent residential property
to the extent feasible.
j. Trash collection areas should not intrude into major
lines of sight when viewed from residential units or
landscaped open areas of the subject development
or adjacent properties.
5. Site Furnishing
Street furnishing such as benches, trash and recycling
receptacles, planter pots, accent pavings, and bollards
create a sense of character and unify a place.
a. Benches should be placed to improve pedestrian
experience within the private and public realm. Benches
may be placed with other furnishing elements to create a
node.
b. Benches should be located with backs against buildings
or with backs perpendicular to the street.
c. Where space allows, benches should be grouped with
trash receptacles and other similar street furnishings.
d. Benches and other similar street furnishings should not
be located in front of any outdoor dining area.
e. Trash and recycling receptacles should be placed in
multiple places along each corridor and in front of new
development to provide multiple convenient waste
disposal locations. Receptacles should also be placed with
other furnishings such as benches and chairs.
DESIGN GUIDELINES
CITY OF ARCADIA
COMMERCIAL AND MIXED-USE DESIGN GUIDELINES 25 Draft
June 2019
9. Lighting
a. Pedestrian lights are typically located along
pathways and sidewalks to illuminate the areas
and provide for additional safety and security.
String or twinkle lighting should be incorporated to
enhance outdoor dining, plazas, courtyards, and
other outdoor spaces.
b. Light fixtures should be designed or selected to be
architecturally compatible with the main structure
or theme of the building.
c. The quality of light, level of light, and type of bulb
or source should be carefully selected so that
lighting levels do not draw attention to the glow or
glare of the project site, and timers and sensors
should be incorporated to avoid unnecessary
lighting.
d. Spotlighting or glare from any site lighting should
be shielded from adjacent properties and directed
at a specific object or target area.
10. Public Art
a. The use of public art within the private or public
realm is an effective way of expressing the unique
personality and character of the area.
b. Public art should serve as an aesthetic
improvement to improve the pedestrian
environment. Stand-alone installations or designs
integrated into the building should both be
considered for future improvements.
c. Public art is encouraged in public spaces, and can
help create a sense of place. Art should be
authentic, participatory or interactive, and
meaningful to the community.
d. The selection and placement of public art should
be part of the overall site design process, rather
than as an afterthought to a project.
e. Public art should be located in conjunction with
other site features, such as a plaza or architectural
feature and an integral part of site development,
rather than a stand-alone, separate object.
f. Public art should be placed so as to avoid
locations where it may obstruct a pedestrian
pathway, create a traffic hazard, or compete with
another piece of art within the area.
DRAFT JUNE 2019
INDUSTRIAL
DESIGN GUIDELINES
CITY OF ARCADIA
INDUSTRIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES ii Draft
June 2019
This page left intentionally blank.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
CITY OF ARCADIA INDUSTRIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES Draft
June 2019 iii
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
CITY COUNCIL
April Verlato, Mayor
Roger Chandler, Mayor Pro Tem
Peter Amundson, Council Member
Tom Beck, Council Member
Sho Tay, Council Member
PLANNING COMMISSION
Brad Thompson, Chair
Deborah Lewis, Vice Chair
Ken Chan, Commissioner
Zi Lin, Commissioner
Marilynne Wilander, Commissioner
SPECIAL THANKS
LEAD CITY STAFF
Jason Kruckeberg, Assistant City Manager/Development Services Director
Lisa Flores, Planning & Community Development Administrator
Jordan Chamberlin, Associate Planner
SUPPORTING CITY STAFF
Dominic Lazzaretto, City Manager
Luis Torrico, Senior Planner
Vanessa Quiroz, Associate Planner
CONSULTANT TO THE CITY
RRM Design Group
CITY OF ARCADIA
INDUSTRIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES iv Draft
June 2019
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK.
CITY OF ARCADIA INDUSTRIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES Draft
June 2019 v
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
A. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 1
1. Introduction. ........................................................................................................ 2
2. How These Design Guidelines are Applied ......................................................... 2
3. How to Use These Design Guidelines ................................................................ 3
4. Applicability to Other City Documents ................................................................. 4
B. DESIGN GUIDELINES ................................................................................... 5
1. Site Planning and Building Placement ................................................................ 7
2. Massing and Scale .............................................................................................. 7
3. Rooflines ............................................................................................................. 8
4. Articulation .......................................................................................................... 8
5. Entries, Windows, and Doors .............................................................................. 8
6. Awnings............................................................................................................... 9
7. Colors and Materials ........................................................................................... 9
8. Site Entry Design .............................................................................................. 10
9. Driveways and Parking ..................................................................................... 10
10. Pedestrian Access ............................................................................................ 11
11. Landscaping ...................................................................................................... 11
12. Public and Private Open Space ........................................................................ 12
13. Equipment and Service Areas ........................................................................... 12
CITY OF ARCADIA
INDUSTRIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES vi Draft
June 2019
This page left intentionally blank.
CITY OF ARCADIA INDUSTRIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES 1 Draft
June 2019
A. INTRODUCTION
CITY OF ARCADIA
INDUSTRIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES 2 Draft
June 2019
1. Introduction
The City of Arcadia’s General Plan and
Development Code promotes high quality design
in buildings, landscape, signage, public realm, and
open space areas. These documents also identify
community design principles applicable to the
City’s ongoing redevelopment, including ‘‘Creating
Identifiable Places,’’ ‘‘Improving the Public Realm,’’
and ‘‘Improving the Private Realm.’’ The General
Plan stresses the importance of quality in design
and the impact that site design and building form
has on enhancing the visual image of Arcadia and
establishing places that people enjoy. The design
guidelines contained within this document have
been written to reinforce these goals and objectives
and provide general guidelines for any addition,
remodel, or construction within any industrial land
use district.
Industrial development serves the community
by playing an important role in creating jobs and
generating revenue for the City. While Arcadia
is primarily known for its homes and regional
mall, the City can become more attractive for
future businesses opportunities and sources of
revenue, while also including the technology
sector of the market. Industrial districts and areas
serve as locations for warehousing, distribution,
manufacturing, and assembly uses.
Primary objectives associated with developing
a quality industrial project within Arcadia include
designing within the established neighborhood
context, minimizing appearance of driveways
and parking areas, incorporating high-quality
architecture, providing open spaces to allow for
pedestrian facilities and employee amenities, and
improving the streetscape environment.
2. How These Design
Guidelines are Applied
These Design Guidelines will be utilized during the
City’s development review process to encourage
the highest level of design quality while at the same
time providing the flexibility necessary to encourage
creativity on the part of an applicant in response
to existing site conditions. Each subsection of
the Design Guidelines contains design objectives
followed by applicable design guidelines that direct
users to desired design strategies for development
or redevelopment of their property. These objectives
seek to highlight the major factors affecting the
development of a particular land use while also
reinforcing direction provided by the General Plan
and Development Code.
Designers and developers are urged to become
familiar with these guidelines and to apply them
throughout the design process to assure that
the design, review, and permitting processes are
as efficient as possible. No claim can be made
that these guidelines encompass every possible
technique for achieving a high level of design
quality. It is important to note that the guidelines are
a minimum starting point for quality development
and the designer is encouraged to use their own
creativity and experience to improve upon the
means for realizing this highest level of quality
design. The guidelines do not seek to impose an
overriding architectural style, a limited color palette,
or an artificial design theme, but rather seek to
promote the positive design characteristics currently
found throughout the City.
INTRODUCTION
CITY OF ARCADIA INDUSTRIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES 3 Draft
June 2019
3. How to Use These Design
Guidelines
Property owners, developers, architects, designers,
and contractors proposing a new development or
redevelopment within Arcadia should first review
the appropriate Development Code sections
governing their property. They should then proceed
to the Design Guidelines document applicable to
their property’s land use – whether Single-Family
Residential, Multifamily Residential, Commercial/
Mixed Use, or Industrial, as well as, Signage.
The goal of this document is to provide clear
and useful recommendations for the design,
construction, review, and approval of development
in Arcadia. The guidelines are intended as a
reference point for a common understanding of
the minimum qualitative design expectations. The
guidelines are offered as one way of achieving
attractive and functional projects that compare
favorably with established community standards. All
development shall comply with the spirit and intent
of the design guidelines presented.
The design guidelines may be interpreted with some
flexibility in the application to specific projects, as
not all design criteria may be appropriate for each
project. In some circumstances, one guideline
may be relaxed in order to accomplish another,
more important, guideline. The overall objective
is to ensure that the intent and spirit of the design
guidelines are followed and to attain the best
possible design within reason.
An essential goal of the General Plan and reinforced
by the design guidelines is to ensure neighborhood
compatibility. “No development exists in isolation.
Every act of construction affects and is affected by
its surroundings. Every development, therefore,
should be evaluated for its compatibility in terms of
use, scale, and aesthetics with the neighborhood or
district in which it is located. For small projects, this
area of influence may be considered to be as small
as to only include the buildings directly next door.
For large projects, one must consider entire
blocks or corridors”. In order to ensure quality
development within the City of Arcadia, these
Design Guidelines have been created to promote
new infill and redevelopment within the City while
ensuring compatibility with existing uses. Guidelines
that reinforce this objective are identified with
a neighborhood symbol ( ). Together, these
strategies reinforce the individual characteristics
that continue to make Arcadia a desirable place to
live.
INTRODUCTION
CITY OF ARCADIA
INDUSTRIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES 4 Draft
June 2019
In addition, the General Plan stresses the
importance of a sustainable future for Arcadia
that includes strategies to conserve and enhance
local resources and safeguard the environment.
In addition to providing strong examples of
good general design principles, this document
provides designers and builders with guidance on
“Sustainable” design. Conventional design and
construction methods can produce buildings that
contribute to excessive resource consumption,
that generate waste, and that are expensive to
operate. The guidelines contained within this
document reinforce this objective and promote
site and building design elements that utilize
green building practices and materials, preserve
existing tree canopy and native vegetation, promote
previous surfaces, reduce or better distribute
travel demand, encourage amenities that support
transit and other alternative forms of transportation,
including bicycling and walking, and support mixed-
use development that provides opportunities for
employment and commercial uses adjacent to
residential units. “Sustainability” principles, which
can improve the environmental performance of a
project without forcing excessive costs on builders
or developers, have been marked with the symbol
of a leaf ( ).
4. Applicability to Other City
Documents
This document is a tool for implementing the City
of Arcadia’s General Plan and Development Code.
While the Design Guidelines contained herein
are not intended to supersede the requirements
of the Development Code, applicants should not
assume that a project will be approved by merely
adhering to the City’s minimum zoning standards
and development regulations. Rather, these
Design Guidelines provide additional guidance to
aide applicants in the design of industrial projects
in order to ensure the high-quality development
desired by the City and the community.
CITY OF ARCADIA INDUSTRIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES 5 Draft
June 2019
B. DESIGN GUIDELINES
CITY OF ARCADIA
INDUSTRIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES 6 Draft
June 2019
DESIGN GUIDELINES
Industrial
Design Guideline Objectives define Arcadia’s priorities and standards for future development. Many of
them have been derived from land use policies established in the General Plan. Development should be
designed to adhere to the following objectives and the supporting guidelines provided.
Objective 1: Ensure new construction, additions, renovations, and infill developments are sensitive to neighborhood context, building form, scale and colors and materials.
Objective 2: Ensure quality industrial development that includes visually appealing architectural design, site design and scale and massing.
Objective 3: Create a cohesive and landscaped street edge that minimizes the appearance of
expansive parking lots or service areas and provides pedestrian access.
Objective 4: Develop landscaping that is compatible with the City’s water efficient landscape
ordinance.
Objective 5: Design public areas to create outdoor amenities and improve the pedestrian experience.
Objective 6: Design equipment and service areas as an integral part of the project to be buffered or screened from public view and neighboring properties.
CITY OF ARCADIA INDUSTRIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES 7 Draft
June 2019
DESIGN GUIDELINES
1. Site Planning and Building Placement
a. Natural amenities such as views should be
preserved.
b. The location, configuration, size, and design of
new or remodeled structures should be compatible
with the character and quality of surrounding sites,
buildings, and structures.
c. The height and bulk of proposed structures should
be in proportion with surrounding sites and should
not visually dominate the site or the neighborhood.
d. On larger sites, focal points such as plazas,
landscaping, art work, textured pavement, and
building features should be incorporated to
enhance the visual experience.
e. The design of buildings, driveways, loading
facilities, parking areas, signs, landscaping, lighting,
solar facilities, and other site features should show
adequate consideration for the visual effect of the
development upon adjacent properties and street
frontage.
f. Buffers should be integrated to protect surrounding
residential neighborhoods from noise, vibration,
odor, and other factors that may have an adverse
effect on the environment.
2. Massing and Scale
a. Large building expanses should be broken
into small-scale units and should not appear
monumental.
b. Street-facing building massing should be organized
to emphasize interior uses of a building such as the
primary entry, corners, and/or office space.
c. A combination of single and multi-story elements
is encouraged to create variation in massing and
building heights.
d. Surface detailing, such as score lines and color
changes, are not considered a substitute for
material integration and distinctive massing and
scale.
e. Roof forms should be varied, articulated, and
broken at intervals by changes in height or
stepbacks to reduce the overall massing.
Entry tower and plaza creates focal point to
enhance the visual effect of the building
Cohesive design achieved through use of
complementary architecture and landscaping
Buffer incorporated to separate industrial from
adjacent uses
CITY OF ARCADIA
INDUSTRIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES 8 Draft
June 2019
DESIGN GUIDELINES
Variation in roofline reinforces building
increments and enhance visual interest
Vertical and horizontal wall articulation provides
visual relief and breaks up the massing
Design details and a canopy used to emphasize
the entry
3. Rooflines
a. Parapets should not appear “tacked on” and should
convey a sense of permanence. If the interior side
of a parapet is visible from the pedestrian and/or
motorist vantage point, it should be designed to be
similar to the exposed façade.
b. Deep eaves, overhangs, canopies, and/or other
architectural features that provide shelter, shade,
and visual interest are encouraged.
c. Rooftop equipment should be concealed from view
and/or integrated within the architecture of the
building.
4. Articulation
a. Large expanses of flat building walls should be
avoided by providing sufficient building articulation.
Vertical and horizontal wall articulation, including
architectural indentations and/or projections, should
be consistent with the chosen architectural style
and be integrated into the overall building design so
as to provide opportunity for shade, shadow, and
visual relief.
b. Detailing of exterior walls at the ground level
should provide an appropriate transition from the
ground plane to the building elevation. Utilize reveal
patterns, changes in materials, building pop-outs,
columns, and recessed areas to create shadow
patterns and depth on the wall surfaces.
5. Entries, Windows, and Doors
a. Primary entries for each of the tenants within an
industrial development should be emphasized
through the use of architectural detailing, lighting,
unique paving, and/or landscaping.
b. Design details that create texture, shade and
shadow, a sense of entry, and pedestrian scale
should be incorporated at building entries.
c. Door types, materials, shapes, proportions, and
detailing should be compatible with the architectural
style of the building and should have quality
molding and framing.
CITY OF ARCADIA INDUSTRIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES 9 Draft
June 2019
DESIGN GUIDELINES
d. Windows should be placed to allow for natural
daylighting to occur within interior work areas.
e. Reflective, mirrored, or opaque glass is strongly
discouraged.
6. Awnings
a. Awnings/canopies used to define building entries
are encouraged and should be compatible with the
architectural style of the building.
b. A solid color is recommended for awnings rather
than bright colors unless used sparingly as an
accent or at a primary building entry.
c. Awnings should be made of a durable, commercial
grade fabric, canvas, metal, or of similar materials
having a matte finish. Glossy, shiny plastic, or
similar awning materials are discouraged.
d. Awning frames and supports should be painted
or be constructed of coated metal or other non-
corroding materials.
e. If used in conjunction with awnings, lighting should
be located directly above the awning and directed
downward. Translucent or “backlit” awnings are
strongly discouraged.
7. Colors and Materials
a. The color balance of the building should consist of
neutral earth tones with brighter “accent colors.”
b. Exposed metal flashing or trim should be anodized
or painted to blend with the exterior colors of the
building.
c. Appropriate materials for building facades include
but are not limited to stucco, stone, tile, split-faced
block, brick, and/or siding.
d. Discouraged building materials include highly
reflective materials, unpainted or smooth monolithic
concrete, T-111 siding, speed (interlocking) or
precision block or non-textured block, and metal.
e. Finish materials should wrap the exterior corner
and terminate at the inside corner. Such treatments
will alleviate the appearance of a “wall paper”
application and will give a sense of permanence to
a structure.
Metal awnings with a matte finish compliment
building design and provide for long term
durability.
Finish materials wrap the outside corners of
buildings and terminate at inside corners
Use of colors, reveals, and windows minimize
large expanses of blank walls and provide
character
CITY OF ARCADIA
INDUSTRIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES 10 Draft
June 2019
DESIGN GUIDELINES
Landscaped median at entry with visible
signage
Site entry design with landscaped center
medians, landscaped parkways on each sides,
and a deep driveway
Landscaped areas screen parking areas from
the roadway
f. The design of accessory structures, fences, and
walls should be harmonious with the principal
building and other buildings on the site, and the
same building materials should be used on all
structures on a site.
g. Apply architectural details in a harmonious manner
consistent with the proportion and scale of the
building façade.
8. Site Entry Design
a. Site ingress and egress points should be located
in consideration of median openings and existing
driveways on the opposite side of the roadway and
should be located far enough from the intersection
so as to not hinder the flow of traffic.
b. In larger parking lots, the main driveway entrance
should extend from a public street to the front cross
aisle and should include:
• A landscaped center median from the public
street to the first bisecting parking aisle;
• Landscaped parkways flanking both sides of
the main entry drive with no parking stalls along
the main entry drive; and
• A deep driveway with the first aisle juncture that
intersects the main entry drive placed to provide
adequate queuing distance from the street.
c. A clearly visible and well-designed project entry
should be created using low walls, paving, accent
landscaping, and signage to visually link the project
site entry to the building(s).
9. Driveways and Parking
a. Parking areas should be concentrated away from
the primary street frontage and located behind
buildings, where feasible.
b. When parking can only be located adjacent to a
street, low landscape area or landscape berms
should be utilized to buffer parking lots from the
street.
c. Parking lot areas, including driveways and/or
spaces, should be separated from buildings by a
raised walkway and landscape strip.
CITY OF ARCADIA INDUSTRIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES 11 Draft
June 2019
DESIGN GUIDELINES
d. Trees should be incorporated into parking lots to
soften the impact of large expanses of paving and
to provide shade for parked vehicles.
e. Bicycle parking should be provided within parking
areas, and racks should be included within the
project furnishings palette.
10. Pedestrian Access
a. Clear, safe pedestrian access should be provided
from parking areas to building entrances through
the use of pedestrian walkways.
b. Pedestrian crossings at driveways and major
circulation aisles should be accentuated through
decorative paving and/or painted crossings.
c. On-site pedestrian circulation systems should
appropriately connect to off-site public sidewalks.
d. Low walls and planter breaks should be provided to
allow for convenient and logical on-site and off-site
pedestrian circulation, where feasible.
e. Where a transit stop occurs in front of a site,
access to a building’s primary entry should be
clearly defined through the use of sidewalks, accent
landscaping, striped parking area crossing, and/or
other features.
11. Landscaping
a. Drought-tolerant landscape design and low water
use plantings should be integrated into all projects.
Some integration of moderate water use plantings
may be acceptable so long as the project water
allowance remains under applicable Water Efficient
Landscape Ordinance (WELO) requirements.
b. Plant selection, soil preparation, planting layout,
and irrigation systems should be selected so as
to balance the aesthetics of a project’s landscape
design with the need to conserve water.
c. Low Impact Development (LID) strategies, such
as permeable paving, vegetated swales, and/or
infiltration areas, should be incorporated into the
design of all projects including landscaped areas.
On-site pedestrian circulation connections to
public sidewalks enhance connectivity and
access
Pedestrian crossing of drive aisle clearly defined
through use of scored, colored concrete
Landscaping used in conjunction with a building
to address privacy issues on adjacent properties
CITY OF ARCADIA
INDUSTRIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES 12 Draft
June 2019
DESIGN GUIDELINES
Example of drought tolerant landscaping and
infiltration area
Loading area located in the rear and screened
Appropriately screened utility area
d. Existing mature landscaping should be maintained
or relocated, where feasible.
e. Landscaping should be developed to contain a
combination of low, medium, and tall plant materials
as appropriate.
f. Landscape design concepts should reflect
adequate spacing of plants that allows for mature
growth and complete coverage of planting areas in
a reasonable amount of time.
12. Public and Private Open Space
a. Open space areas should contain a mix of
landscaping and hardscaping.
b. Unique paving treatments, such as scored or
colored concrete, permeable pavers, or tile, should
be incorporated into semi-public spaces and
employee break areas.
c. Locate employee outdoor areas adjacent to indoor
break areas.
d. Design outdoor employee areas to have sunlight
and shade during at least part of the day and offer
wind protection, comfort, and safety.
e. Facilities such as patios, barbecue areas,
recreational facilities, or other improvements for
outdoor enjoyment and/or recreation of employees
are encouraged.
13. Equipment and Service Areas
a. Loading areas and associated loading activities
should be located to the rear of buildings and
screened from view so as to not be visible from a
public street.
b. Service facilities, including trash enclosures,
storage areas, utility meters, etc., should be located
and designed for easy access by service vehicles
and should not intrude into major lines of sight
when viewed from public view.
c. Where applicable, alleys should be utilized to
provide access to service entrances, loading docks,
and refuse collection areas.
d. Loading and delivery areas should be located away
CITY OF ARCADIA INDUSTRIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES 13 Draft
June 2019
DESIGN GUIDELINES
from the adjacent residential property.
e. Proposed lighting should be located to avoid glare
and to reflect light away from adjoining property and
public right-of-ways.
f. Mechanical and electrical equipment should
be located within the building and not within an
external utility cabinet.
g. All mechanical equipment on the site should be
appropriately screened from view. Large vent stacks
and similar features should be avoided.
h. Utility facilities should be placed underground,
where feasible.
i. All backflow prevention devices should be screened
from public view per the standards set forth in the
Development Code and integrated into the site plan
in a way that does not detract from the appearance
of the building.
Landscaping used to screen utilities
DRAFT JUNE 2019
SIGNAGE
DESIGN GUIDELINES
CITY OF ARCADIA
SIGNAGE DESIGN GUIDELINES ii Draft
June 2019
This page left intentionally blank.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
CITY OF ARCADIA SIGNAGE DESIGN GUIDELINES Draft
June 2019 iii
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
CITY COUNCIL
April Verlato, Mayor
Roger Chandler, Mayor Pro Tem
Peter Amundson, Council Member
Tom Beck, Council Member
Sho Tay, Council Member
PLANNING COMMISSION
Brad Thompson, Chair
Deborah Lewis, Vice Chair
Ken Chan, Commissioner
Zi Lin, Commissioner
Marilynne Wilander, Commissioner
SPECIAL THANKS
LEAD CITY STAFF
Jason Kruckeberg, Assistant City Manager/Development Services Director
Lisa Flores, Planning & Community Development Administrator
Jordan Chamberlin, Associate Planner
SUPPORTING CITY STAFF
Dominic Lazzaretto, City Manager
Luis Torrico, Senior Planner
Vanessa Quiroz, Associate Planner
CONSULTANT TO THE CITY
RRM Design Group
CITY OF ARCADIA
SIGNAGE DESIGN GUIDELINES iv Draft
June 2019
This page left intentionally blank.
CITY OF ARCADIA SIGNAGE DESIGN GUIDELINES Draft
June 2019 v
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
A. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... 1
1. Introduction .................................................................................................. 2
2. How These Design Guidelines are Applied ............................................. 3
3. How to Use These Design Guidelines...................................................... 3
4. Applicability to Other City Documents ...................................................... 4
B. DESIGN GUIDELINES ............................................................................ 5
1. General Design Guidelines ....................................................................... 7
2. Freestanding Signs (Monument and Pylon) ........................................... 8
3. Blade Signs ................................................................................................. 9
4. Wall Signs .................................................................................................... 9
5. Awning/Canopy Signs ................................................................................ 5
6. Window Signs ........................................................................................... 11
7. Marquee Signs .......................................................................................... 11
8. Mural Signs ............................................................................................... 11
9. Sign Type Example ...........................................................................12
CITY OF ARCADIA
SIGNAGE DESIGN GUIDELINES vi Draft
June 2019
This page left intentionally blank.
CITY OF ARCADIA SIGNAGE DESIGN GUIDELINES 1 Draft
June 2019
A. INTRODUCTION
CITY OF ARCADIA
SIGNAGE DESIGN GUIDELINES 2 Draft
June 2019
1. Introduction
The City of Arcadia’s General Plan and
Development Code promotes high quality
design in buildings, landscape, signage,
public realm, and open space areas.
These documents also identify community
design principles applicable to the City’s
ongoing redevelopment, including ‘‘Creating
Identifiable Places,’’ ‘‘Improving the Public
Realm,’’ and ‘‘Improving the Private Realm.’’
The General Plan stresses the importance
of quality in design and the impact that it has
on enhancing the visual image of Arcadia
and establishing places that people enjoy.
The design guidelines contained within this
document have been written to reinforce
these goals and objectives and provide
general guidelines for signage.
Signage plays an important role in the
success of any business by providing ease
of location information and identification
by prospective customers. When signs are
properly integrated into a building design, they
can provide a personal quality that contributes
to the ambiance of a project or streetscape,
especially more unique, individualized signs
that convey a business activity or service
provided. Alternatively, signs can also intrude
upon surrounding environment when they are
applied as an afterthought within a project.
The intent of the guidelines in this Section is as
follows:
• Provide each sign user an opportunity
for adequate identification while
guarding against the excessive and
confusing proliferation of signs by
appropriately regulating the time, place,
and manner under which signs may be
displayed.
• Preserve and enhance the community’s
appearance by regulating the
type, size, location, quality, design,
character, scale, color, illumination, and
maintenance of signs.
• Encourage well-designed signs that
attract and invite rather than demand
the public’s attention.
• Encourage the design of signs that
complement the structures and uses
to which they relate and that are
harmonious with their surroundings.
• Ensure freedom of expression for sign
uses, including noncommercial speech,
by maintaining a content-neutral
approach to sign regulation.
• Enhance the safety of motorists
and pedestrians by minimizing the
distraction of intrusive signs, as well as
to protect the life, health, property, and
general welfare of City residents and
visitors.
• Provide a review process for signs
to ensure compliance with the
requirements of this Section.
The following design guidelines are intended
to balance the legitimate needs for business
identification with the need to prevent visual
clutter that detracts from a project and the
community’s overall character.
INTRODUCTION
CITY OF ARCADIA SIGNAGE DESIGN GUIDELINES 3 Draft
June 2019
2. How These Design
Guidelines are Applied
These Design Guidelines will be utilized
during the City’s development review process
to encourage the highest level of design
quality while at the same time providing the
flexibility necessary to encourage creativity
on the part of an applicant in response
to existing site conditions. Designers and
developers are urged to become familiar
with these guidelines and to apply them
throughout the design process to assure that
the design, review, and permitting processes
are as efficient as possible. No claim can
be made that these guidelines encompass
every possible technique for achieving a high
level of design quality. It is important to note
that the guidelines are a minimum starting
point for quality signage and the designer
is encouraged to use their creativity and
experience to improve upon the means for
realizing this highest level of quality design.
The guidelines do not seek to impose an
overriding style, a limited color palette, or
an artificial design theme, but rather seek to
promote the positive design characteristics
currently found throughout the City.
3. How to Use These Design
Guidelines
Property owners, developers, architects,
designers, and contractors proposing a
new development or redevelopment within
Arcadia should first review the appropriate
Development Code sections governing their
property. If the project involves additional
construction beyond signage, the applicant
should also refer to the Design Guidelines
document applicable to their property’s land
use – whether Single-Family Residential,
Multifamily Residential, Commercial/Mixed
Use, or Industrial.
The goal of this document is to provide
clear and useful recommendations for the
design, construction, review, and approval
of signs within Arcadia. The guidelines are
intended as a reference point for a common
understanding of the minimum qualitative
design expectations. The guidelines are
offered as one way of achieving attractive and
functional projects that compare favorably
with established community standards. All
development shall comply with the spirit and
intent of the design guidelines presented.
The design guidelines may be interpreted
with some flexibility in the application to
specific projects, as not all design criteria
may be appropriate for each project. In
some circumstances, one guideline may be
relaxed in order to accomplish another, more
important, guideline. The overall objective is to
ensure that the intent and spirit of the design
guidelines are followed and to attain the best
possible design within reason.
INTRODUCTION
CITY OF ARCADIA
SIGNAGE DESIGN GUIDELINES 4 Draft
June 2019
The Arcadia General Plan provides guidance on
the design of signs:
“Commercial signs have a significant influence
on the overall aesthetic impact of a given street.
If signs have enough uniformity and are well-
proportioned and appropriate to their context,
they can collectively function much the same way
as public art in providing a sense of place and
unique identity. If, on the other hand, signs are
ill proportioned, cheap looking, and an odd mix
of styles (monument versus pylon versus wall
signs), they create visual “noise” and clutter that
make it difficult to see the positive qualities of the
street and to locate businesses.”
4. Applicability to Other City
Documents
In addition to these guidelines, applicants should
also refer to the Development Code for signage
standards and additional design criteria related
to signs. For specific definitions of each of the
sign types included below, applicants should
refer to the Development Code. While the Design
Guidelines contained herein are not intended to
supersede the requirements of the Development
Code, applicants should not assume that a
project will be approved by merely adhering
to the City’s minimum zoning standards and
development regulations. Rather, these Design
Guidelines provide additional guidance to aide
applicants in the design of signs for all projects
in order to ensure the high quality desired by the
City and the community.
CITY OF ARCADIA SIGNAGE DESIGN GUIDELINES 5 Draft
June 2019
B. DESIGN GUIDELINES
CITY OF ARCADIA
SIGNAGE DESIGN GUIDELINES 6 Draft
June 2019
DESIGN GUIDELINES
SIGNAGE
Design Guideline Objectives define Arcadia’s priorities and standards for future development. Many of
them have been derived from land use policies established in the General Plan. Development should
be designed to adhere to the following objectives and the supporting guidelines provided.
Objective 1: Guide the design and development of signs that are attractive and well-coordinated
with the building and surrounding context.
CITY OF ARCADIA SIGNAGE DESIGN GUIDELINES 7 Draft
June 2019
DESIGN GUIDELINES
1. General Sign Guidelines
a. Signs should be integrated into the building design,
complementary of the building architecture, and
compatible with the building colors and materials
and other signage on the building.
b. Signs should be in scale with, and in proportion to,
the primary building façade so that the signs do not
dominate the appearance.
c. The method of attaching the sign to the building
should be integrated into the overall sign design.
d. Signs should not cover up important architectural
features.
e. Signage should consist of the store name. Tag
lines, bylines, merchandise or service descriptions
are discouraged.
f. Flush-mounted signs should be positioned within
architectural features, such as the window panel
above the storefront or flanking the doorways.
g. Buildings with historical significance should use
signs, lettering, and other accent features that are
typical of the era of construction.
h. Signs should not cause unnecessary distractions
to motorists or differ aesthetically from the
surrounding architecture.
i. Space for signage should be designed into building
elevations that are adjacent to public streets.
j. Symbols and logos should be used in place of
words to aide in ease of business identification,
where feasible.
k. Signs that advertise an occupant’s business
through the use of graphic or crafted symbols, such
as shoes, keys, glasses, or books are strongly
encouraged. These types of figurative signs may be
incorporated into any of the allowable sign types.
l. The number of lettering styles on a sign should not
exceed more than two styles for small signs and
three styles for larger signs.
m. Sign lettering and wording should be appropriately
spaced, not crowded together or overly spaced, to
aid in ease of legibility.
Example of metal used for business signage
Appropriately spaced sign lettering
Example of contemporary sign incorporating
wood and metal
CITY OF ARCADIA
SIGNAGE DESIGN GUIDELINES 8 Draft
June 2019
DESIGN GUIDELINES
Example of a sign advertising an occupant’s
business
Wood lettered sign with gooseneck downlights
Freestanding pylon sign with complementary
colors and lettering
n. Typefaces should be clearly legible.
o. The total number of colors used in any one sign
should be minimized to no more than two to three.
p. The following materials are encouraged:
• Wood (carved, sandblasted, etched and
properly sealed, primed and painted, or
stained);
• Metal (formed, etched, cast, engraved and
properly primed and painted or factory coated
to protect against corrosion); or
• Custom neon tubing in the form of graphics or
lettering may be incorporated into sign design.
q. The following materials are discouraged: foam,
fiberglass, and reflective materials that may be
difficult to read.
r. The use of indirect lighting sources like spotlights or
gooseneck downlights are encouraged as indirect
lighting emphasizes the continuity of the building’s
surface.
s. Reverse channel letters with halo lighting is
preferred over internally illuminated, front lit
channel letter signs.
2. Freestanding Signs (Monument and Pylon)
a. Freestanding signs that are well articulated, well-
proportioned, and accented with landscaping are
encouraged at project entries.
b. Freestanding signs should incorporate
complementary colors, materials, and lettering fonts
consistent with the building materials.
c. Freestanding signs should be placed perpendicular
to the street.
d. Freestanding signs should be placed in a manner
to maintain adequate vehicular sight distances at
entry driveways.
e. Materials used for sign bases should match an
architectural element of the building.
f. All sides of freestanding signs should be finished.
Use of a decorative trim at the top is encouraged.
CITY OF ARCADIA SIGNAGE DESIGN GUIDELINES 9 Draft
June 2019
DESIGN GUIDELINES
g. Freestanding signs should be in proportion to
the relevant development and the context of the
surrounding neighborhood in height, depth, and
length.
h. Monument signs with dimension lettering should
ensure that lettering depth is in proportion to the
size of the sign.
3. Blade Signs
a. The bottom of a projecting or blade/bracket sign
should maintain adequate pedestrian clearance
from the sidewalk level to allow for unobstructed
and unimpeded flow of pedestrian foot traffic.
b. Signs should not be mounted or project above the
eave line or parapet.
c. Decorative iron and wood brackets that support
projecting signs are strongly encouraged.
d. The lines of any proposed brackets should
harmonize with the overall shape of a sign and
should be able to adequately hold up the projecting
sign.
e. To avoid damaging building brick or stonework,
brackets should be designed so they can be bolted
into masonry joints, where feasible.
f. Blade signs with dimensional lettering and/or logos
should ensure that lettering depth is in proportion to
the size of the sign.
4. Wall Signs
a. The following types of walls signs are strongly
recommended:
• Dimensional letter forms with seamless edge
treatments;
• Reverse channel lettering with halo lighting;
• Cut or fabricated steel, painted or unfinished;
• Polished metal;
• Etched metal or glass, sandblasted glass;
• Metal, hardwoods, glass;
• Halo or exposed channel neon;
• Silhouette illumination;
• Externally illuminated signs using a separate
light source like spotlight or gooseneck
downlight; or
• Dimensional geometric shapes and three-
dimensional forms.
Blade/bracket signs provide clear direction
for pedestrians and enhance streetscape
continuity.
Example of an engraved wood sign with iron
brackets
Dimensional lettering made of brass with
seamless edge treatments
CITY OF ARCADIA
SIGNAGE DESIGN GUIDELINES 10 Draft
June 2019
DESIGN GUIDELINES
Signage limited to business name while also
incorporating playful symbols
Negative space around sign provides balance
on building facade
Awnings with removable flaps should be
considered
b. Signs proposed to be located on buildings that
have existing signage should be designed (size,
location, colors, lighting, and materials) to be
consistent with the existing signs.
c. The text of permanent storefront signage should be
limited to the name of the business, address, and/
or generic type of goods or services offered.
d. All signs should fit comfortably into their storefront
architecture leaving sufficient margins and negative
space on all sides. Thickness, height, and colors
of sign lettering and graphics should be visually
balanced and in proportion to other signs on the
building.
e. Panel signs should be constructed of a durable
material such as metal or wood.
f. Raceways should be avoided where possible and,
if exposed, should be painted to match the color of
the building.
g. When replacing flat panel signs, new signs should
utilize dimensional lettering. If utilizing light, the
background should remain solid opaque while the
letters and logos may transmit light.
5. Awning/Canopy Signs
a. Signs should be appropriately sized and scaled
with the building façade on which they appear.
b. Lettering, logos, symbols, and graphics should be
compatible with the chosen awning/canopy and that
of the overall building color palette.
c. When installed, applicants should consider
installing awnings or canopies with removable
valance flaps and end panels in order to
accommodate future changes in business signage.
d. Letters and logos should be silkscreen printed or
sewn on the vertical surface. Painting of awnings or
canopies is strongly discouraged.
e. The shape, design, and color of fabric awnings and
canopies should be carefully coordinated with, and
should not dominate, the architectural style of the
building on which they appear.
f. Where other fabric awnings or canopies are used
on a building, the design and color(s) should be
coordinated together.
CITY OF ARCADIA SIGNAGE DESIGN GUIDELINES 11 Draft
June 2019
DESIGN GUIDELINES
6. Window Signs
a. Window signs should be limited to individual
letters placed on the interior surface of the window
and designed to be viewed from outside of the
business.
b. Window sign text should be limited to the business
name and may include a brief message(s)
identifying the type of products or services
provided.
c. Window signs should be grouped to minimize the
blocking of views into the business.
7. Marquee Signs
a. Marquee signs may include the venue name as
well as changeable copy related to current and
future attractions.
b. Venue name should be designed with bright colors
and may be painted, rendered in neon tube, or
constructed of individually-shaped letters that are
either internally-lit or lit from concealed external
sources.
c. Use of more than one material for a sign or
structure is strongly recommended.
d. Changeable copy should use movable simple black
lettering against a white background.
e. If changeable copy is provided, the venue or name
should not occupy more than a third of the total
marquee sign area.
f. If no changeable copy is provided, the venue name
should be limited to 75 percent of the sign area.
8. Mural Signs
a. Mural signs should be sited in a highly visible
location, and sized appropriately for their location.
b. Paint for mural signs should be vivid, and of high
quality.
c. Creative designs and fonts are encouraged.
Group together window signage to minimize
obstruction of views
Example of marquee sign featuring black
lettering with white background
Mural sign appropriately sized and sited
CITY OF ARCADIA
SIGNAGE DESIGN GUIDELINES 12 Draft
June 2019
DESIGN GUIDELINES
9. SIGN TYPE EXAMPLES
Monument sign Freestanding sign
Blade sign Wall sign
CITY OF ARCADIA SIGNAGE DESIGN GUIDELINES 13 Draft
June 2019
DESIGN GUIDELINES
Awning sign Marquee Sign
Window Sign Mural Signs
Attachment No. 3
Attachment No. 3
Ordinance No. 2363 – Text Amendment to
the City’s Development Code
Exhibit A
Exhibit “A”
Text Amendment
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
Division 2:
Zones, Allowable Uses, and Development Standards
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
Section 9102.01 – Residential Zones
Subsections:
9102.01.010 Purpose and Intent
9102.01.020 Land Use Regulations and Allowable Uses
9102.01.030 Development Standards in Single-Family Residential Zones (R-M, R-0, R-1)
9102.01.040 Additional Residential Development Standards in Single-Family Residential Zones
9102.01.050 Permitted Projections in Single-Family Residential Zones
9102.01.060 Accessory Structures in Single-Family Residential Zones
9102.01.070 Swimming Pools, Spas, Water Features, and Ornamental Features
9102.01.080 Accessory Dwelling Units
9102.01.090 Development Standards in Multifamily Residential Zones (R-2, R-3, R-3-R)
9102.01.100 Additional Residential Development Standards in Multifamily Zones
9102.01.110 Permitted Projections in Multifamily Zones
9102.01.120 Site Design and Architectural Standards
9102.01.130 Exterior Lighting Standards for Residential Properties and Zones
9102.01.140 Other Applicable Regulations
9102.01.010 Purpose and Intent
The purpose of the residential zones is to:
1. Provide for a full range of housing types and densities consistent with the General Plan;
2. Preserve, protect, and enhance the character of Arcadia’s residential neighborhoods and the quality of life of City
residents;
3. Ensure adequate light, air, privacy, and open space for each dwelling; and
4. Ensure that the scale and design of new development and alterations to existing structures are compatible with
surrounding homes and appropriate to the physical characteristics of the site and the area where the project is
proposed.
A. R-M Residential Mountainous Zone. The R-M zone is intended to provide areas for detached single-family dwelling units
on estate-type lots in the hillside and valley areas of the City and accessory uses compatible with the residential use of the
zone. This zone implements the General Plan Residential Estates designation.
B. R-0 Very Low Density Residential Zone. The R-0 zone is intended to provide areas for detached single-family dwelling
units on large lots and accessory uses compatible with the residential use of the zone. This zone implements the General
Plan Residential Estates, Very Low Density Residential, and Low Density Residential designations.
C. R-1 Low Density Residential Zone. The R-1 zone is intended to provide areas for detached single-family dwelling units
and accessory uses compatible with the residential use of the zone. This zone implements the General Plan Very Low
Density Residential and Low Density Residential designations.
D. R-2 Medium Density Residential Zone. The R-2 zone is intended to provide areas for a variety of dwelling types and
accessory uses compatible with the residential use of the zone. Types of dwelling units include attached or detached single-
unit and multi-unit homes and duplexes at a density of six to 12 dwelling units per acre. This zone implements is the
General Plan Medium Density Residential designation.
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
E. R-3 High Density Residential Zone. The R-3 zone is intended to provide areas for a variety of medium- to high-
density residential development and accessory uses compatible with the residential use of the zone. Types of
dwelling units include single-unit attached, townhomes, condominiums, and apartment structures at a density of 12 to
30 units per acre. This zone implements the General Plan High Density Residential designation.
F. R-3-R Restricted High Density Residential Zone. The R-3-R zone is intended to provide areas for medium to high-
density residential development at a density of 12 to 30 units per acre but restricted to one story in height.
Accessory uses compatible with the residential use of the zone are also permitted. This zone implements the
General Plan High Density Residential designation.
9102.01.020 Land Use Regulations and Allowable Uses
Amended by Ord. No. 2347
Amended by Ord. No. 2348
A. Allowed Uses. Table 2-1 (Allowed Uses and Permit Requirements for Residential Zones) indicates the uses allowed
within each residential zone and any permits required to establish the use, pursuant to Division 7 (Permit Processing
Procedures). The regulations for each zone are established by letter designations as follows:
“P” represents permitted
(allowed) uses. “A” represents
accessory uses.
“M” designates uses that require the approval of a Minor Use Permit subject to requirements of Section
9107.09 (Conditional Use Permit and Minor Use Permit) of this Development Code.
“C” designates uses that require the approval of a Conditional Use Permit subject to requirements of Section
9107.09
(Conditional Use Permit and Minor Use Permit) of this Development
Code. “--” designates uses that are not permitted.
B. Director Determination. Land uses are defined in Division 9 (Definitions). In cases where a specific land use or
activity is not defined, the Director shall assign the land use or activity to a classification substantially similar in
character. Land uses not listed in the table or not found to be substantially similar to the land uses below are
prohibited.
C. Specific Use Regulations. Where the last column in Table 2-1 (Allowed Uses and Permit Requirements for
Residential Zones) includes a Section, Subsection, or Division number, the regulations in the referenced
Section, Subsection, or Division shall apply to the use.
Table 2-1
Allowed Uses and Permit Requirements for Residential Zones
P Permitted
A Permitted as an Accessory Use
M Minor Use Permit Required
C Conditional Use Permit Required
-- Not Allowed
Land Use
R-M
R-0
R-1
R-2
R-3
R-3-R Specific Use
Regulations
Residential Uses
Boarding House -- -- -- -- -- --
Dwellings
Single-Family Dwelling P P P P P --
See required minimum
density (Section
9102.01.090, Table 2-6
and) Subsection
9102.01.100.A
(Exceptions to Minimum
Density in R-2 and R-3)
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
Table 2-1
Allowed Uses and Permit Requirements for Residential Zones
P Permitted
A Permitted as an Accessory Use
M Minor Use Permit Required
C Conditional Use Permit Required
-- Not Allowed
Land Use
R-M
R-0
R-1
R-2
R-3
R-3-R Specific Use
Regulations
Multifamily Dwelling -- -- -- P P P
Two-Family Dwelling -- -- -- P P P
Accessory Dwelling Unit
A
A
A
A
A
A
Only permitted as an
accessory use on multi-
family zoned properties
which are currently
improved with no more
than one single-family
dwelling unit. See also
Subsection 9102.01.080
(Accessory Dwelling
Units)
Short-Term Rental
--
--
--
--
--
--
No Person shall post,
publish, circulate,
broadcast, or maintain
any advertisement of a
Short-Term Rental in any
zone allowing residential
uses. See Section
9104.02.300
Home Sharing
--
--
--
--
--
--
No Person shall post,
publish, circulate,
broadcast, or maintain
any advertisement for
Home Sharing in any
zone allowing residential
uses. See Section
9104.02.300
Agricultural Uses
Urban Agriculture A A A A A A See Subsection
9104.02.030 (Agricultural
Uses –Urban Agriculture,
Small Animal and Fowl,
and Horses)
Horse Keeping A A A -- -- --
Small Animal and Fowl Keeping
A
A
A
--
--
--
Education
Schools, Private
C
C
C
C
C
C
May only be permitted as a
Conditional Use,
accessory to a Place of
Religious Assembly.
Medical-Related and Care Uses
Day Care, General
--
--
--
--
--
--
See Subsection
9104.02.080 (Day Care,
General)
Day Care, Limited - Small Family
A
A
A
A
A
A
See Subsection
9104.02.100 (Day Care,
Limited – Small Family)
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
Table 2-1
Allowed Uses and Permit Requirements for Residential Zones
P Permitted
A Permitted as an Accessory Use
M Minor Use Permit Required
C Conditional Use Permit Required
-- Not Allowed
Land Use
R-M
R-0
R-1
R-2
R-3
R-3-R Specific Use
Regulations
Day Care, Limited - Large Family
A
A
A
A
A
A
See Subsection
9104.02.090 (Day Care,
Limited – Large Family)
Residential Care Facility – Six or fewer
persons
P
P
P
P
P
P
See Subsection
9104.02.260 (Residential
Care Facilities)
Supportive Housing – Housing Type -- -- -- P P P See Subsection
9104.02.260 (Residential
Care Facilities)
See Subsection
9104.02.260 (Residential
Care Facilities)
Supportive Housing – Residential Care
Facility Small Type
P
P
P
P
P
P
Transitional Housing – Housing Type -- -- -- P P P
Transitional Housing – Residential Care
Facility Small Type
P
P
P
P
P
P
Other Uses
Antennas and Wireless Communication
Facilities - Co-location or Panel -- -- -- -- P P
Exception: All facilities are
permitted on City- owned
properties and public
rights-of-way. New
standalone facilities are not
permitted in Architectural
Design (D) overlay zones.
See also Subsection
9104.02.050 (Antennas and
Wireless Communication
Facilities)
Antennas and Wireless Communication
Facilities - Standalone Facility -- -- -- -- -- --
Places of Religious Assembly -- C C C C --
Sports Courts (Private) P P P P P P
Must comply with
Subsection 9104.02.330
(Sports Courts in
Residential Zones)
Recharging Stations A A A A A A
Utility Structures and Service Facilities C C C C C C
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
9102.01.030 Development Standards in Single-Family Residential Zones (R-M, R-0, R-1)
Amended by Ord. No. 2347
New land uses and structures, and alterations to existing land uses and structures, shall be designed, constructed, and/or
established in compliance with the requirements in Tables 2-1 (Allowed Uses and Permit Requirements for Residential Zones),
2-2 (Development Standards for Single-family Residential Zones), and 2-3 (Additional Development Standards for
Homeowners Association Areas Maximum Floor Area in Specific Homeowners Associations Areas), and the development
standards in Division 3 (Regulations Applicable to All Zones-Site Planning and General Development Standards). Additional
regulations are denoted in the right hand column of Table 2-2 and Table 2-3. Exceptions and additional regulations are included
in Subsection 9102.01.040 (Additional Residential Development Standards in Single-Family Residential Zones). Standards for
accessory structures and accessory dwelling units are outlined in Subsection 9102.01.060 (Accessory Structures in Single-
family Residential Zones) and Subsection 9102.01.080 (Accessory Dwelling Units). Development standards for garages and
other parking areas are located in Section 9103.07 (Off-Street Parking and Loading). Development standards for fences, walls,
and gates are outlined in Section 9103.05 (Fences, Walls, and Gates). Development standards for landscaping requirements
are located in Section 9103.09.040.B (Landscape Requirements for Residential Zones).
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
Table 2-2
General Development Standards for
Single-family Residential Zones (R-M, R-0, R-1)
Development Feature R-M R-0 R-1 Additional Requirements
Lot Standards
Minimum Lot Area (sq ft)
15,000
R-0-30,000: 30,000
R-0-22,000: 22,000
R-0-15,000: 15,000
R-0-12,500: 12,500
R-1-15,000: 15,000
R-1-10,000: 10,000
R-1-7,500: 7,500
Minimum Lot Width
At Front Property Line 100 ft;
44 ft for cul-de-sac lots
100 ft;
57 ft for cul-de-sac lots
75 ft;
44 ft for cul-de-sac lots
At Front Setback Line 75 ft 100 ft
85 ft on reverse corner lot
75 ft
Minimum Lot Depth 100 ft 100 ft 100 ft
Structure Form and Location Standards
Maximum Floor Area
Areas North of Huntington Drive (Outside of Homeowners Associations Identified by City Council Resolution)
For Maximum Allowable Floor Area applicable
to Homeowners Associations Identified by City
Council Resolution (on file with the Planning
Department), see Subsection 9102.01.040.A
(Floor Area Ratios Standards for Specific
Homeowners Association Areas).
For measurement standards and general
exceptions, see also Subsection 9103.01.030
(Measuring Floor Area and Floor Area Ratio).
Lot Size: Up to 7,500 sf 45% of lot area
7,501 – 10,000 3,375 sq ft plus 40% of lot area over 7,500 sq ft
10,001 – 15,000 4,375 sq ft plus 35% of lot area over 10,000 sq ft
15,001 – 20,000 6,125 sq ft plus 25% of lot area over 15,000 sq ft
20,001 – 30,000 7,375 sq ft plus 20% of lot area over 20,000 sq ft
30,001 + 9,375 sq ft plus 15% of lot area over 30,000 sq ft
Areas South of Huntington Drive (Outside of Homeowners Associations Identified by City Council Resolution)
Lot Size: Up to 10,000 sf 45% of lot area
10,001 – 15,000 4,500 sq ft plus 40% of lot area over 10,000 sq ft
15,001 – 20,000 6,500 sq ft plus 30% of lot area over 15,000 sq ft
20,001 – 40,000 8,000 sq ft plus 25% of lot area over 20,000 sq ft
40,001 + 13,000 sq ft plus 32% of lot area over 40,000 sq ft
Incentive for One-Story
Houses
3% of lot area in additional floor area
Maximum Density
1 unit per lot
1 unit per lot
1 unit per lot Except as allowed by Subsection 9102.01.080
(Accessory Dwelling Units)
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
Table 2-2
General Development Standards for
Single-family Residential Zones (R-M, R-0, R-1)
Development Feature R-M R-0 R-1 Additional Requirements
Minimum Setbacks
Front
25 ft
35 ft
25 ft
See Subsection 9102.01.040 (Additional
Residential Development Standards),
Subsection 9103.01.060 (Setback
Measurements and Exceptions), and
Subsection 9102.01.050 (Permitted
Projections in Single-family Residential Zones)
Side – first or single story
Interior
10 ft or 10% of lot width,
whichever is greater, but not to
exceed 15 ft as a required
setback
10 ft or 10% of the lot width,
whichever is greater
5 ft or 10% of the lot width,
whichever is greater
See Subsection: 9102.01.040 (Additional
Residential Development Standards in Single-
family Residential Zones).
Corner (street side) 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft
Reverse Corner (street side) 20 ft 25 ft 25 ft
Side - second story
Interior
15 ft or 20% of the lot width,
whichever is greater
15 ft or 20% of the lot width,
whichever is greater
10 ft or 20% of the lot width,
whichever is greater
Corner (street side)
20 ft
20 ft
20 ft
Reverse Corner (street side) 20 ft 25 ft 25 ft
Rear
First or single story 25 ft 35 ft 25 ft Additional rear setback of one foot required on
each story for every 10 feet above 150 feet of
lot depth. See Subsection 9102.01.040
(Additional Residential Development
Standards in Single-family Residential
Zones).
Second story
35 ft
35 ft
35 ft
Maximum Lot Coverage
1-story dwellings
45%
45%
45%
2-story dwellings 35% 35% 35%
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
Table 2-2
General Development Standards for
Single-family Residential Zones (R-M, R-0, R-1)
Development Feature R-M R-0 R-1 Additional Requirements
Maximum Height
25 ft for lots less than 71-foot lot
width; an additional 1 ft in height
for every additional 1 ft in lot
width up to 75 ft lot (30 ft height).
80-85 ft lot width: 31 ft
85’-1”-90 ft lot width: 32 ft
90’-1”-95 ft lot width: 33 ft
95’-1”-100 ft lot width: 34 ft
100’-1”+ ft lot width: 35 ft
25 ft for lots with less than 75-
foot lot width
30 ft for lots with 75-foot width
or greater
Citywide: 25 ft for lots with less
than 75-foot lot width; 30 ft for
lots with 75-foot width or greater
Village Homeowners Association
Area: 25 feet for any lot width
Highlands Homeowners
Association Area:
Less than 75 ft lot width: 25 ft
75’-1”-94 ft lot width: 27 ft
94’-1”-114 ft lot width: 29 ft
See Subsection 9103.01.030 (Measuring Floor
Area and Floor Area Ratio)
Maximum Number of Stories
2 stories
2 stories
2 stories Exposed basements shall be considered a
story.
Maximum Street-Facing Porch
Height
14 ft
14 ft
14 ft
See Subsection 9102.01.040.I (Porch Height).
Encroachment Plane
Front Property Line
40 degrees
30 degrees
30 degrees No portion of any structure shall encroach
through a plane projected from the identified
angle as measured at the ground level along
the front property line. That point shall be
located at the intersection of a horizontal
projection of the adjacent grade elevation and
its intersection with the property line. See
Figure 2-1 (Encroachment Plane).
Interior Rear and/or Interior Side
N/A
N/A
N/A
Corner Street Side Property Line N/A 40 degrees 40 degrees
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
Table 2-3 (1)
Additional Development Standards for Homeowners Association Areas
Single-family Residential Zones (R-M, R-0, R-1)
Maximum Floor Area in Specific Homeowners Association Areas
For measurement standards and general exceptions, see also Subsection 9103.01.030 (Measuring Floor Area and Floor Area Ratio).
HOA and Lot Size Floor Area Ratio
Santa Anita Village and Highlands HOAs
Less than 10,000 sf 35% of lot area
10,001 – 15,000 3,500 sq ft plus 25% of lot area over 10,000 sq ft
15,001 – 20,000 4,750 sq ft plus 10% of lot area over 15,000 sq ft
20,001 – 30,000 5,250 sq ft plus 10% of lot area over 20,000 sq ft
30,001 + 6,250 sq ft plus 10% of lot area over 30,000 sq ft
Lower Rancho and Santa Anita Oaks HOAs
Less than 10,000 sf 37% of lot area
10,001 – 15,000 3,700 sq ft plus 37% of lot area over 10,000 sq ft
15,001 – 20,000 5,550 sq ft plus 20% of lot area over 15,000 sq ft
20,001 – 30,000 6,550 sq ft plus 20% of lot area over 20,000 sq ft
30,001 + 8,550 sq ft plus 15% of lot area over 30,000 sq ft
Upper Rancho HOA
Less than 10,000 sf 45% of lot area
10,001 – 15,000 4,500 sq ft plus 40% of lot area over 10,000 sq ft
15,001 – 20,000 6,500 sq ft plus 30% of lot area over 15,000 sq ft
20,001 – 40,000 8,000 sq ft plus 25% of lot area over 20,000 sq ft
40,001+ 13,000 sq ft plus 32% of lot area over 40,000 sq ft
Incentive for One-Story Homes in all HOA Areas
3% of the lot area in additional floor area
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
Table 2-3 (1)
Additional Development Standards for Homeowners Association Areas
Single-family Residential Zones (R-M, R-0, R-1)
Development Feature Santa Anita Village
(R-1)
Highlands
(R-M and R-1)
Lower Rancho
(R-0)
Santa Anita Oaks
(R-0)
Upper Rancho
(R-0) Additional Requirements
Minimum Setbacks
Front 25 ft 25 ft 35 ft
65 ft
Exceptions: Tract
13544 shall be a
minimum of 60 ft
Tracts 13345 and
11013 shall be a
minimum of 55 ft and
Tract 14565 shall be
a minimum of 50 ft
50 ft
See Subsection 9102.01.040
(Additional Residential
Development Standards),
Subsection 9103.01.060
(Setback Measurements and
Exceptions), and Subsection
9102.01.050 (Permitted
Projections in Single-family
Residential Zones)
Side – first or single story
Interior
5 ft or 10% of the lot
width, whichever is
greater
R-M: 10 ft or 10% of
lot width, whichever
is greater, but not to
exceed 15 ft as a
required setback
R-1: 6 ft or 10% of
the lot width,
whichever is greater
10 ft or 10% of the lot
width, whichever is
greater
10 ft or 10% of the
lot width, whichever
is greater
15 ft
See Subsection: 9102.01.040
(Additional Residential
Development Standards in
Single-family Residential
Zones).
Corner (street side) 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft See Subsection:
9102.01.040 (Additional
Residential Development
Standards in Single-family
Residential Zones).
Reverse Corner (street
side) 25 ft R-M: 20 ft
R-1: 25 ft 25 ft 25 ft 25 ft
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
Table 2-3 (1)
Additional Development Standards for Homeowners Association Areas
Single-family Residential Zones (R-M, R-0, R-1)
Development Feature Santa Anita Village
(R-1)
Highlands
(R-M and R-1)
Lower Rancho
(R-0)
Santa Anita Oaks
(R-0)
Upper Rancho
(R-0) Additional Requirements
Side - second story
Interior
10 ft or 20% of the lot
width, whichever is
greater
R-M: 15 ft or 20% of
the lot width,
whichever is greater
R-1: 10 ft or 20% of
the lot width,
whichever is greater
15 ft or 20% of the lot
width, whichever is
greater
15 ft or 20% of the
lot width, whichever
is greater
15 ft or 20% of the
lot width, whichever
is greater See Subsection: 9102.01.040
(Additional Residential
Development Standards in
Single- family Residential
Zones). Corner (street side) 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft
Reverse Corner (street
side) 25 ft R-M: 20 ft
R-1: 25 ft
35 ft
35 ft 35 ft
Rear
First or single story 25 ft 25 ft 35 ft 35 ft 40 ft Additional rear setback of one
foot required on each story for
every 10 feet above 150 feet of
lot depth. See Subsection
9102.01.040 (Additional
Residential Development
Standards in Single-family
Residential Zones).
Second story 35 ft 35 ft 35 ft 35 ft 35 ft
Maximum Lot Coverage
1-story dwellings 45% 45% 45% 45% 45%
2-story dwellings 35% 35% 35% 35% 35%
Maximum Number of
Stories 2 stories 2 stories 2 stories 2 stories 2 stories Exposed basements shall be
considered a story.
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
Table 2-3 (1)
Additional Development Standards for Homeowners Association Areas
Single-family Residential Zones (R-M, R-0, R-1)
Development Feature Santa Anita Village
(R-1)
Highlands
(R-M and R-1)
Lower Rancho
(R-0)
Santa Anita Oaks
(R-0)
Upper Rancho
(R-0) Additional Requirements
Maximum Street-Facing
Porch Height 14 ft 14 ft 14 ft 14 ft 14 ft See Subsection 9102.01.040.I
(Porch Height).
Encroachment Plane
Front Property Line 30 degrees R-M: 40 degrees
R-1: 30 degrees 30 degrees 30 degrees 30 degrees
No portion of any structure
shall encroach through a plane
projected from the identified
angle as measured at the
ground level along the front
property line. That point shall
be located at the intersection of
a horizontal projection of the
adjacent grade elevation and
its intersection with the
property line. See Figure 2-1
(Encroachment Plane).
Interior Rear and/or
Interior Side N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Corner Street Side
Property Line N/A 40 degrees 40 degrees 40 degrees 40 degrees 40 degrees
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
Table 2-3 (1) (3)
Additional Development Standards for Homeowners Association Areas
Single-family Residential Zones (R-M, R-0, R-1)
Development Feature Village
(R-1)
Highlands
(R-M and R-1)
Lower Rancho
(R-0)
Oaks
(R-0)
Upper Rancho
(R-0)
Maximum Height (2) 25 ft
R-M:
25 ft for lots less than 71-foot lot
width; an additional 1 ft in
height for every additional 1 ft in
lot width up to 75 ft lot (30 ft
height).
80-85 ft lot width: 31 ft
85’-1”-90 ft lot width: 32 ft
90’-1”-95 ft lot width: 33 ft
95’-1”-100 ft lot width: 34 ft
100’-1”+ ft lot width: 35 ft
R-1:
Less than 75 ft lot width: 25 ft
75’-94 ft lot width: 27 ft
94’-1”-114 ft lot width: 29 ft
114’-1” ft lot or larger width: 30
ft
25 ft for lots with less than
75- foot lot width
30 ft for lots with 75-foot
width or greater
25 ft for lots with less
than 75- foot lot width
30 ft for lots with 75-foot
width or greater
25 ft for lots with less than
75- foot lot width
30 ft for lots with 75-foot
width or greater
Notes:
(1) In cases where the underlying zoning’s Development Standard is greater than the requirements stated in Table 2-3, Additional Development Standards for Homeowners Association Areas Single-
family Residential Zones (R-M, R-0, R-1), the underlying zoning shall be used unless an exception is specifically identified.
(2) See Subsection 9103.01.030 (Measuring Floor Area and Floor Area Ratio)
(3) See Subsection 9102.01.040(J) for additional regulations regarding garages and carports.
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE –ARTICLE IX:DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
Figure 2-1
Encroachment Plane – R-0 and R-1 Zones
9102.01.040 Additional Residential Development Standards in Single-Family Residential Zones
Amended by Ord. No. 2347
(This section has been relocated to the table above)
A. Floor Area Standards for Specific Homeowners Association Areas. Maximum floor area in Lower
Ranch, Santa Anita Oaks, Upper Rancho, Santa Anita Village, and Highland Oaks Homeowners
Associations, as identified by City Council Resolution (on file with the Planning Department), shall be
subject to a maximum floor area as defined in Table 2-3 (Maximum Floor Area in Specific Homeowners
Association Areas). For additional development standards and map of the Homeowners’ Association
(HOA) areas, refer to the applicable City Council Resolution (on file with the Planning Department).
\Table 2-3
Maximum Floor Area
in Specific
Lot Size Floor Area Ratio
Santa Anita Village and Highland Oaks HOAs
Less than 10,000 sf 35% of lot area
10,001 – 15,000 3,500 sq ft plus 25% of lot area over
15,001 – 20,000 4,750 sq ft plus 10% of lot area over
20,001 – 30,000 5,250 sq ft plus 10% of lot area over
30,001 + 6,250 sq ftp lust 10% of lot area over
Lower Rancho and Santa Anita Oaks HOAs
Less than 10,000 sf 37% of lot area
10,001 – 15,000 3,700 sq ft plus 37% of lot area over
15,001 – 20,000 5,550 sq ft plus 20% of lot area over
20,001 – 30,000 6,550 sq ft plus 20% of lot area over
30,001 + 8,550 sq ft plus 15% of lot area over
Upper Rancho HOA
Less than 10,000 sf 45% of lot area
10,001 – 15,000 4,500 sq ft plus 40% of lot area over
15,001 – 20,000 6,500 sq ft plus 30% of lot area over
20,001 – 40,000 8,000 sq ft plus 25% of lot area over
40,001+ 13,000 sq ftp lust 32% of lot area over
Incentive for One-Story 3% of the lot area in additional floor area
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
A. Front Setbacks – Additional Standards in R-M, R-0, and R-1 Zones
1. Front Setback Exceptions
a. Front Setback Exception: R-M Zone. The front setback shall be the average of the two nearest developed lots
that front on the same street, unless a greater setback is specified in Subsection 9102.01.030, Table 2-3
(Additional Development Standards for Homeowners Association Areas) or Subsection 9103.01.060 (Setback
Measurements and Exceptions).
b. Front Setback Exception: R-0 Zone. The front setback shall be the greater of (a) 35 feet; and (b) the average of
the two nearest developed lots, unless a greater setback is specified in Subsection 9102.01.030, Table 2-3
(Additional Development Standards for Homeowners Association Areas) or Subsection 9103.01.060 (Setback
Measurements and Exceptions).
c. Front Setback Exception: R-1 Zone. The front setback shall be the greater of (a) 25 feet; and (b) the average of
the two nearest developed lots, unless a greater setback is specified in Subsection 9102.01.030, Table 2-3
(Additional Development Standards for Homeowners Association Areas) or Subsection 9103.01.060 (Setback
Measurements and Exceptions).
B. No Parking within Front and/or Street Side Setbacks. No parking shall be allowed within required front or street side
setbacks, or within any landscaped area not designated as a driveway or parking space.
C. Exceptions to Rear Setbacks on Corner and Reverse Corner Lots in R-0 and R-1 Zones – Attached Single-Story
Garage. On corner and reverse corner lots in the R-0 and R-1 zones, an attached garage portion of a main dwelling that
does not exceed one story and 16 feet in height may be located within 15 feet of the rear property line.
D. Height Exception for Chimneys and Roof-Mounted Vents. Chimneys and roof-mounted vents shall be allowed to
exceed height limits to the minimum extent required by Article VIII (Building Regulations).
E. Temporary/Portable Structures. One temporary or portable structure, with the exception of tents and canopies, not
exceeding 120 square feet in area and eight feet six inches in height is permitted. The structure shall comply with all
setback requirements and, if applicable, be approved by the City’s established Homeowners’ Association.
F. Roof Decks. Roof decks are not permitted in the R-M, R-0, and R-1 zones.
G. Basements
1. Extent. Basements shall not extend beyond the external walls of the first story of the structure above the basement.
2. Minimum Setback. On any lot, the minimum setback to the basement wall is 10 feet from any property line.
3. Light Wells. Light wells for basements and exterior stairways to basements are permitted to the extent necessary to
comply with Building and Fire Codes. Light wells for basements and exterior stairways shall be set back a minimum of
five feet from any property lines.
H. Porch Height
1. There shall be no vertical or architectural elements located above the building primary entrance entry that emphasizes
the scale and massing of the structure.
2. For projecting porches, the maximum allowable height as required in Table 2-2 shall be measured to the uppermost
point of the projecting feature, including roof ridges, railings, cornices, and other decorative features. For
recessed porches, the height shall be measured to the uppermost point of the opening.
I. Hillside Development Standards. Hillside development standards outlined in this Subsection shall apply to development
of all new structures, additions to existing structures, and other property improvements in the R-M zone and any lot with an
average slope of 20 percent or greater. For the purposes of this Subsection, swimming pools, spas, and fish ponds
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
constructed on a lot shall all be considered structures.
1. Minimum Distance between Structures and Slopes. In addition to the setback requirements that apply to the
underlying zone, the minimum distance between a structure and the top or toe of slope where the slope is between the
structure and front, side, and/or rear property line(s) shall be 5 feet. See Figure 2-2 (Minimum Distance Between
Structures and Slopes).
Figure 2-2
Minimum Distance Between Structures and Slopes
2. Ridgeline Protection
a. Structures shall be located so that a vertical separation of at least 30 feet is provided between the top of the
structure and the top of the ridge or knoll to maintain the natural appearance of the ridge. Grading should also be
avoided within 30 vertical feet of the top of a ridge or knoll. Placement of structures should also take advantage of
existing vegetation for screening, and should include the installation of additional native plant materials to
augment existing vegetation, where appropriate.
b. Structures shall not be placed so that they appear silhouetted against the sky when viewed from a public street,
except where the Review Authority determines that the only feasible building site cannot comply with this
standard. See Figure 2-3 (Ridgeline Protection – Residential Hilltop Line of Sight).
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
Figure 2-3
Ridgeline Protection – Residential Hilltop Line of Sight
3. Landscaping Requirements. All cut or fill slopes exceeding six feet six inches in vertical height between two or more
contiguous lots shall be planted with adequate plant material to protect the slope against erosion. Said planting shall
cover the bank within two years from the time of planting. The permittee, owner or developer shall water the planted
slopes at sufficient time intervals to promote growth.
4. Maintenance and Grading Permit Required. The owner of any property, or any other person or agent in control of
such property, on which is located any retaining walls, cribbing, drainage structures, planted slopes and other
protective devices, required pursuant to a permit granted under this Division or required pursuant to the issuance of a
grading permit, shall maintain said retaining walls, cribbing, drainage structures, planted slopes and other protective
devices in good condition and repair at all times.
J. Garages and Carports in Homeowners Association Areas. Carports shall not be permitted in the Homeowners Association
Areas. The following regulations shall apply to garages in Homeowners Association Areas:
1. Santa Anita Village: Garages shall not dominate the front elevation and shall be setback from the front façade or located
in the backyard.
2. Lower Rancho: Garages shall not dominate the front elevation and shall be setback from the front façade or located in
the backyard.
3. Santa Anita Oaks: No garage shall be closer to the front property line than the main dwelling. Front facing garage are
strongly discouraged. A detached garage shall not be located less than 150 feet from the front property line.
Exceptions: Tract 11013 which shall be a minimum of 140 ft. Tracts 13345, 14656, & 13544 shall be a minimum of
125 ft.
4. Upper Rancho: No garage door shall be allowed to face the public right-of-way within the front 150 ft of the property. No
garage door shall be closer to the street than the dwelling. Corner lots shall be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
Exception: Lots 1 through 20 of Tract No. 13184
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
DRAFT – June 2019 TOC-1 Table of Contents
Division 7:
Permit Processing Procedures
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
Section 9107.01 – City-Required Permits and Approvals
Subsections:
9107.01.010 Purpose and Intent
9107.01.020 Discretionary Permits and Actions
9107.01.030 Additional Permits May Be Required
9107.01.040 Burden of Proof and Precedence
9107.01.010 Purpose and Intent
Amended by Ord. No. 2347
This Division establishes the overall structure for the application, review, and action on City-required permit applications and
identifies and describes those discretionary permits and other approvals required by this Development Code in Table 7-1
(Review Authority).
9107.01.020 Discretionary Permits and Actions
A. Administrative Permits and Actions. Except when combined with legislative actions or other non-administrative actions
defined in this Division, the Director, also defined in this Development Code as the designee of the Director, is the
designated Review Authority for the following quasi-judicial permits and actions, which are generally limited to interpretation
of policy or relatively minor adjustments of Development Code standards. Additionally, the Director has primary
administrative authority over certain activities which require the determination of compliance with applicable Development
Code provisions. The Director, at the Director’s sole discretion, may elevate the level of review to a higher Review Authority.
1. Administrative Modifications. An administrative action granting exception (modification or deletion) to certain
specified development standards of this Development Code in cases where strict compliance would result in a
hardship as specified in and processed in compliance with Section 9107.05 (Administrative Modifications).
2. Certificates of Demolition. An administrative action authorizing the issuance of a Certificate of Demolition in
compliance with Section 9107.07 (Certificates of Demolition).
3. Development Code Interpretations. An administrative interpretation of certain provisions of this Development Code
in an effort to resolve ambiguity in the regulations and to ensure their consistent application in compliance with Section
9101.02 (Interpretation of the Development Code Provisions).
4. Home Occupation Permits. An administrative permit authorizing the operation of a specified home based occupation
in a particular location in compliance with the provisions of this Development Code and in compliance with procedures
specified in Section 9107.13 (Home Occupation Permits).
5. Minor Use Permits. An administrative permit authorizing the operation of a specific use of land or a structure in a
particular location in compliance with the provisions of this Development Code and in compliance with procedures
specified in Section 9107.09 (Conditional Use Permits and Minor Use Permits).
6. Reasonable Accommodations. An administrative permit authorizing limited modifications to properties to
accommodate a person with specified disabilities and physical limitations in compliance with specific criteria and
performance standards and in compliance with procedures specified in Section 9107.17 (Reasonable
Accommodations).
7. Sign-Related Permits
a. Sign Permits. An administrative permit authorizing a variety of signs, including individual signs for promotional
advertising in compliance with specific provisions and conditions of this Development Code and Section 9103.11
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
(Signs). Temporary signs may also be approved in conjunction with a Temporary Use Permit issued in compliance
with Section 9107.23 (Temporary Use Permits).
b. Comprehensive Sign Programs. A process through which permissible on-site signage is reviewed to provide for
a coordinated, complementary program of signage within a single development project consisting of multiple
tenant spaces or a zone.
8. Site Plan and Design Review. An administrative review process providing for review of projects for compliance with
the provisions of this Development Code and with any site plan or architectural design guidelines adopted by the City
and as provided in Section 9107.19 (Site Plan and Design Review). The review role is delegated to Department Staff,
the Director, the Commission, or the Council (for applications requiring Council determinations) as specified in Section
9107.19 (Site Plan and Design Review) and Table 7-3 (Review Authority for Site Plan and Design Review).
9. Site Plan and Design Review: Homeowners Associations Areas. An administrative review process providing for
review of projects located in Homeowners Association Areas established by City Council Resolution for compliance
with the provisions of this Development Code, City Council Resolution, and architectural design guidelines adopted by
the City and as provided in Section 9107.210 (Site Plan and Design Review: Homeowners Association Areas). The
review role is delegated to Department Staff, the Director, the Homeowners Association Architectural Review Board
Chairperson, the Homeowners Association Architectural Review Board, the Commission, or the Council (for
applications requiring Council determinations) as specified in Section 9107.210 (Site Plan and Design Review:
Homeowners Association Areas) and Table 7-4 (Review Authority Site Plan and Design Review: Homeowners
Association Areas).
10. Temporary Use Permits. An administrative permit authorizing specific limited term uses in compliance with specified
conditions and performance criteria specified in Section 9107.23 (Temporary Use Permits).
11. Tree Encroachment, Preservation, and/or Removal. [Place Holder]
12. Zoning Clearances. A nondiscretionary administrative plan-check process of nonexempt uses and structures that do
not otherwise require review to determine compliance with applicable provisions of this Development Code as specified
in Section 9107.27 (Zoning Clearances).
B. Quasi-Judicial Permits and Actions. Except when combined with legislative actions, the Commission is the designated
Review Authority for the following quasi-judicial permits and actions. Additionally, review of administrative permits and
actions may be referred to the Commission. A public hearing is required for the following quasi-judicial actions in
compliance with Section 9108.13 (Public Notices and Hearings).
1. Conditional Use Permits. A permit authorizing the operation of a specific use of land or a structure in a particular
location in compliance with the provisions of this Development Code and the procedures specified in Section 9107.09
(Conditional Use Permits and Minor Use Permits).
2. Planned Development Permits. A permit authorizing the development of land that may not conform with the
applicable zone-driven standards or related regulations, but which complies with the goals and policies of the General
Plan for a particular area in compliance with Section 9107.15 (Planned Development Permits). A Variance may also
allow for exceptions to development standards, but only when strict State-mandated findings can be made.
3. Variances. An action granting exception to the development standards of this Development Code in cases where
strict compliance would result in a unique hardship in compliance with Section 9107.25 (Variances). A Planned
Development Permit may also allow for exceptions to development standards, but only when provisions for enhanced
amenities can be demonstrated and the project site is at least one acre.
C. Legislative Actions. The designated Review Authority for all legislative actions is the Council. A public hearing is required
for the following legislative actions in compliance with Section 9108.13 (Public Notices and Hearings).
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
1. Density Bonus for Affordable Housing. An action authorizing a residential density bonus in compliance with Section
9103.15 (Density Bonus for Affordable or Senior Housing).
2. Development Agreements and Amendments. An agreement between the City and a party with legal or equitable
interest in the real property relating to the development of property in compliance with Section 9107.11 (Development
Agreements).
3. Development Code Text/Zoning Map Amendments. An action authorizing either a text amendment to this
Development Code or a map amendment changing the zoning designation of particular property in compliance with
Section 9108.03 (Amendments).
4. General Plan Text/Map Amendments. An action authorizing either a text amendment to the General Plan or a map
amendment changing the General Plan land use designation of particular property in compliance with Section 9108.03
(Amendments).
5. Specific Plans and Amendments. A regulatory document prepared in compliance with Government Code Section
65450 et seq. for the systematic implementation of the General Plan for a particular area as specified in Section
9107.21 (Specific Plans).
D. Subdivision Maps and Other Approvals
1. Subdivision of Land. Regulations governing the subdivision of land are established in Division 5 (Subdivisions).
2. Buildings and Construction. Provisions for construction and building are established in Municipal Code Article VIII
(Building Regulations).
9107.01.030 Additional Permits May Be Required
A land use on property that complies with the permit requirement or exemption provisions of this Development Code shall also
comply with the permit requirements of other Municipal Code provisions and any permit requirements of other agencies before
construction or use of the property is commenced. All necessary permits shall be obtained before starting work or establishing a
new use. Nothing in this Development Code shall eliminate the need to obtain any permits required by:
A. Any other Municipal Code provisions, including Building, Grading, or other construction permits; a Business License in
compliance with Municipal Code Section 6211 (License Required), if required; or subdivision approval if required by Division
5 (Subdivisions); or
B. Any applicable county, regional, State, or Federal regulations.
9107.01.040 Burden of Proof and Precedence
A. Burden of Proof. The burden of proof to establish the evidence in support of the required finding(s) for any permit or
approval in compliance with this Division is the responsibility of the applicant.
B. Precedence
1. Each permit shall be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
2. The granting of a prior permit either on the subject property or any other property within the City does not create a
precedent and is not justification for the granting of a new permit under current review.
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
This page intentionally left blank.
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
Section 9107.03 – Application Processing Procedures
Subsections:
9107.03.010 Purpose and Intent
9107.03.020 Application Submittal
9107.03.030 Eligible Applicants
9107.03.040 Submittal Requirements
9107.03.050 Filing Fees and Requirements
9107.03.060 Initial Application Completeness Review
9107.03.070 Environmental Assessment
9107.03.080 Application Review and Determinations
9107.03.010 Purpose and Intent
Amended by Ord. No. 2347
A. This Division provides procedures and requirements for the preparation, filing, and initial processing of the land use permit
applications required by the City and specified in this Development Code.
B. Table 7-1 (Review Authority), identifies the Review Authority responsible for reviewing and making decisions on each type
of application required by this Development Code.
Table 7-1
Review Authority
Type of Action
Applicable
Code
Section
Role of Review Authority (1)
Director Commission Council
Legislative Actions
Development Agreements and Amendments 9107.11 Recommend (1) Recommend Decision
Development Code Amendments 9108.03 Recommend (1) Recommend Decision
General Plan Amendments 9108.03 Recommend (1) Recommend Decision
Specific Plans and Amendments 9107.21 Recommend Recommend Decision
Zoning Map Amendments 9108.03 Recommend Recommend Decision
Planning Permits and Approvals and Administrative Actions
Administrative Modifications 9107.05 See Table 7-2 for specified thresholds
Certificates of Demolition 9107.07 Decision Appeal Appeal
Conditional Use Permits 9107.09 Recommend Decision (2)(4) Appeal
Home Occupation Permits 9107.13 Decision (3) Appeal Appeal
Interpretations 9101.03 Decision (3) Appeal Appeal
Minor Use Permits 9107.09 Decision (3) Appeal Appeal
Planned Developments 9107.15 Recommend Decision (4) Appeal
Reasonable Accommodations 9107.17 Decision (3) Appeal Appeal
Sign Permits 9103.11 Decision (3) Appeal Appeal
Site Plan and Design Review
(See Table 7-3 for specified thresholds.)
9107.19 Decision (3) Decision/
Appeal (4)
Appeal
Site Plan and Design Review: Homeowners
Association Areas
(See Table 7-4 for specified thresholds.)
9107.20 Decision (6) Appeal Appeal
Temporary Use Permits 9107.23 Decision (3) Appeal Appeal
Tree Encroachment, Preservation, and
Removal
9700 See Section 9702.01.040 for specified thresholds
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
Variances 9107.25 Recommend Decision (4) Appeal
Zoning Clearances (ADU) 9107.27 Issue Appeal(5) Appeal(5)
Notes:
(1) "Recommend" means that the Review Authority makes a recommendation to a higher decision making body; "Decision" means that
the Review Authority makes the final decision on the matter; "Issue" means that the Review Authority grants the Zoning Clearance
after confirming compliance with all applicable provisions of this Development Code; and "Appeal" means that the Review Authority
may consider and decide upon appeals to the decision of an earlier decision making body, in compliance with Section 9108.07
(Appeals).
(2) The final Review Authority for a Conditional Use Permit granting a Density Bonus, in compliance with Section 9107.03 (Application
Processing Procedures) shall be the Council, with the Commission first making a written recommendation to the Council.
(3) The Director may defer action and refer the request to the Commission for consideration and final decision.
(4) The Commission may defer action and provide a recommendation to the Council for consideration and final decision.
(5) A Zoning Clearance (ADU) may only be appealed if a determination pursuant to 9103.070.050.D.4.a or 9107.27.030.D.1 has been
made.
(6) For Site Plan and Design Review: Homeowners Association Areas, the Director Review shall include reviews by the
Director under the City Review process, reviews by the HOA ARB Chairperson under the Short Review process and
reviews by the HOA Architectural Review Board under the Regular Review process.
9107.03.020 Application Submittal
A. Concurrent Filing. An applicant for a development project that requires the filing of more than one application (e.g.,
Conditional Use Permit, Tentative Map, etc.), shall file all related applications concurrently, together with all application fees
required by Subsection 9107.03.050 Filing Fees Requirements), below, unless these requirements are waived by the
Director.
B. Concurrent Processing. Multiple applications for the same project shall be processed concurrently, and shall be reviewed,
and approved or denied by the highest Review Authority designated by this Development Code for any of the applications.
For example, a project for which applications for Zoning Map Amendment and a Conditional Use Permit are filed shall have
both applications decided by the Council, instead of the Commission being the final decision making authority for the
Conditional Use Permit as otherwise required by Table 7-1 (Review Authority), above. In the example cited, the Commission
would still hear all of the applications (the Zoning Map Amendment and the Conditional Use Permit) and forward
recommendations to the Council.
C. Pre-Application Conference
1. A prospective applicant is strongly encouraged to request a pre-application conference with the Director or designated
Department Staff member before completing and filing a permit application required by this Development Code.
2. The purpose of a pre-application conference is to generally:
a. Inform the applicant of City requirements as they apply to the proposed project;
b. Discuss the City's review process, possible project alternatives, or modifications; and
c. Identify information and materials the City will require with the application, including any necessary technical
studies and information anticipated for the environmental review of the project.
3. Neither the pre-application review nor the provision of information and/or pertinent policies shall be construed as either
a recommendation for approval or denial of the application or project by the City’s representative.
4. Failure of the City’s representative to identify all required studies or all applicable requirements at the time of pre-
application review shall not constitute a waiver of those studies or requirements.
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
9107.03.030 Eligible Applicants
A. An application may only be filed by the owner of the subject property or a lessee or authorized agent of the property owner
with the written consent of the property owner. With the Director's approval, a lessee with the exclusive right to use the
property for a specified use may file an application related to that use.
B. The application shall be signed by the owner of record or may be signed by the lessee or by authorized agent of the
property owner if written authorization from the owner of record is filed concurrently with the application.
9107.03.040 Submittal Requirements
A. Each application for a permit, amendment, or other matter pertaining to this Development Code shall be filed with the
Department or ARB Chairperson on a City application form, together with all required fees and/or deposits and all other
information and materials specified in the most up-to-date Department handout for the specific type of application and/or as
specified by the Director.
B. Applicants are encouraged to contact the Director or ARB Chairperson before submitting an application to verify which
materials are necessary for application filing.
C. No application shall be received unless it fully complies with the requirements specified for the application.
D. Applications filed in compliance with this Division shall be numbered consecutively in the order of their filing and shall
become a part of the permanent official records of the City, and shall contain copies of all notices and actions pertaining to
the application.
9107.03.050 Filing Fees and Requirements
A. Fee Schedule
1. The Council shall establish a schedule of fees for the processing of the applications required by this Development
Code, hereafter referred to as the Fee Schedule.
2. The Fee Schedule is intended to allow recovery of all costs to the maximum extent by law, incurred by the City in
processing permit applications.
3. The Fee Schedule may be amended as often as deemed necessary by the Council.
B. Timing of Payment
1. Applications shall not be deemed complete, and processing shall not commence, on any application until all required
fees or deposits have been paid. Payment of required fees and/or deposits shall not deem the application complete in
compliance with Section 9107.03.060 (Initial Application Completeness Review), below.
2. Failure to timely pay supplemental requests for payment of required fees and/or deposits shall be a basis for denial or
revocation of any permit or other requested entitlement, notwithstanding any other provisions of this Development
Code.
C. Refunds and Withdrawals
1. Application fees cover City costs for public hearings, mailings, staff and consultant time and the other activities
involved in processing applications.
2. No refund due to denial shall be allowed.
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
3. In the case of a withdrawal or rejection, the Director shall have the discretion to authorize a partial refund based upon
the pro-rated costs to-date and the status of the application at the time of withdrawal or rejection.
9107.03.060 Initial Application Completeness Review
A. Review for Completeness. The Director shall review each application for completeness and accuracy before it is accepted
as being complete and officially filed. The Director's determination of completeness shall be based on the City's most up-to-
date list of required application contents and any additional written instructions provided to the applicant in any pre-
application conference and/or during the initial application review period.
1. Notification of Applicant. Except for Site Plan and Design Review (Section 9107.19) and Site Plan and Design
Review: Homeowners Association Areas (Section 9107.20) for single-family dwellings and as required by Government
Code Section 65943, within 30 days following application filing, the applicant shall be informed in writing, either that the
application is complete and has been accepted for processing, or that the application is incomplete and that additional
information, specified in the Director's letter, shall be provided.
2. Appeal of Determination. Where the Director has determined that an application is incomplete, and the applicant
believes that the application is complete and/or that the information requested by the Director is not required, the
applicant may appeal the Director's determination in compliance with Section 9108.07 (Appeals).
3. Time for Submittal of Additional Information. When an application is incomplete, the time used by the applicant to
submit the required additional information shall not be considered part of the time within which the determination of
completeness shall occur. The time available to an applicant for submittal of additional information is limited by the
following Subparagraph A. 4.
4. Expiration of Application
a. If an applicant fails to provide the additional information specified in the Director's letter within 90 days following
the date of the letter, or shorter time frame as determined by the Director, the application shall expire and be
deemed withdrawn without any further action by the City, unless an extension is approved by the Director for good
cause shown.
b. After the expiration of an application, future City consideration shall require the submittal of a new, complete
application and associated filing fees.
5. Environmental Information. After an application has been accepted as complete, the Director may require the
applicant to submit additional information needed for the environmental review of the project in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City's CEQA guidelines, and Section 9107.03.070 (Environmental
Assessment), below.
B. Referral of Application. At the discretion of the Director, or where otherwise required by this Development Code or State
or Federal law, an application may be referred to any public agency that may be affected by or have an interest in the
proposed project.
9107.03.070 Environmental Assessment
A. CEQA Review. After acceptance of a complete application, the project shall be reviewed in compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to determine whether:
1. The proposed project is exempt from the requirements of CEQA;
2. The proposed project is not a “project” as defined by CEQA;
3. A Negative Declaration may be issued;
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
4. A Mitigated Negative Declaration may be issued; or
5. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and related documents shall be required.
B. Compliance with CEQA. These determinations and, where required, the preparation of appropriate environmental
documents, shall be in compliance with CEQA and the City’s CEQA guidelines.
C. Special Studies Required. One or more special studies, paid for in advance by the applicant, may be required to complete
the City’s CEQA compliance review. These studies shall become public documents and neither the applicant nor any
consultant who prepared the studies shall assert any rights to prevent or limit the documents’ availability to the public.
9107.03.080 Application Review and Determinations
A. Director’s Evaluation. The Director shall review all discretionary applications filed in compliance with this Division to
determine whether they comply and are consistent with the provisions of this Development Code, other applicable
provisions of the Municipal Code, the General Plan, and any applicable specific plan.
B. Commission Investigation. The Commission shall cause to be made by its own members, or members of its City Staff, an
investigation of the facts bearing upon the application that will serve to provide all information necessary to ensure that the
action on each application is consistent with the intent of this Development Code and with previously approved
amendments, Modifications, or Variances.
C. Staff Report. The Director shall provide a written recommendation to the Commission and/or Council (as applicable) as to
whether the application should be approved, approved subject to conditions, or denied.
D. Report Distribution. Each staff report shall be furnished to the applicant at the same time as it is provided to the Review
Authority before action on the application.
E. Administrative Act. All acts performed by City officers under the provisions of this Division shall be construed as
administrative acts performed for the purpose of ensuring that the purpose and intent of this Division shall apply in special
cases, as provided in this Division, and shall not be construed as amendments to the provisions of this Division or the
Official Zoning Map.
F. Notice of the Decision. Within five days after final action by the applicable Review Authority on an application, notice of
the decision in the matter shall be mailed to the applicant at the address shown upon the application and to all other
persons who have filed a written request for notices of decision with the Department.
G. Not Construed as Amendments. All acts performed by City officers under the provisions of this Division shall be
construed as administrative acts performed for the purpose of ensuring that the intent and purpose of this Development
Code shall apply in special cases as provided in this Division and shall not be construed as amendments to the provisions
of this Development Code or the Official Zoning Map of the City.
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
This page intentionally left blank.
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
Section 9107.20 – Site Plan and Design Review: Homeowners Association Areas
Subsections:
9107.20.010 Purpose and Intent
9107.20.020 Applicability
9107.20.030 Authority
9107.20.040 Application Filing, Processing, and Review
9107.20.050 Findings and Decision
9107.20.060 Conditions of Approval
9107.20.070 Issuance of Other Required Permits and Approvals
9107.20.080 Minor Changes by Director
9107.20.090 Post Decision Procedures
9107.20.010 Purpose and Intent
A. Purpose. The purpose of this Section is to provide a process for the appropriate review of development projects within
Homeowners Association Areas established by City Council Resolution.
B. Intent. The intent of this Section is to ensure that all approved site and structural development:
1. Respects the physical and environmental characteristics of the site;
2. Ensures safe and convenient access and circulation for pedestrians and vehicles;
3. Exemplifies the best professional high quality design practices;
4. Allows for and encourages individual identity for specific uses and structures;
5. Encourages the maintenance of a distinct neighborhood and/or community identity;
6. Minimizes or eliminates negative or undesirable visual impacts; and
7. Provides for the adequate dedication of land for public purposes and the provision of public infrastructure, associated
with the subject development.
9107.20.20 Applicability
A. Site Plan and Design Review Required. No one shall construct any structure, or relocate, rebuild, or enlarge or modify
any existing structure or site, including façade improvement, fences and walls, landscaping, and hardscaping until a Design
Review has been approved in compliance with this Section and Table 7-4 (Review Authority for Site Plan and Design
Review: Homeowners Association Areas), below.
B. Compliance with Section Required
1. Building or Grading Permits, Business Licenses, or Certificates of Occupancy shall not be issued until the requirements
of this Section have been met.
2. Any permit or approval specified in Subparagraph 1., above, issued in violation of this provision shall be deemed void.
C. Use of the City’s Design Guidelines
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
1. Established by Council Resolution. General design review criteria and related guidelines for residential projects
shall be established by resolution of the Council.
2. Influence Design. The City’s Design Guidelines are intended to be used to adhered and applied to the design of
single-family development, and the exterior alterations or re-development of land uses within Homeowners Association
Areas. The Design Guidelines should be used as a starting point during design process and to ensure the design is
compatible and harmonious with the context of that neighborhood and/or area.
3. Strive for Creativity and Innovation. Owners of properties should strive to be creative and innovative and look
beyond franchise or boilerplate architectural and landscape architectural design treatment.
9107.20.030 Authority
A. Site Plan and Design Review Required. Structures, fences or walls, or landscaping erected or modified within
Homeowners Association Areas to accommodate the land use activities listed in Division 2 (Zones, Allowable Uses, and
Development Standards) shall require the approval of a Design Review through the specified review process in Section
9107.03.010.
B. Required Before Issuance of Other Required Permits. Design Review approval shall be required before the issuance of a
Building or Grading Permit, or Certificate of Occupancy for any new structure, fences or walls, and existing structures to be
reconstructed or remodeled (including facade improvements). Any exceptions shall be specified in Table 7-4 (Review
Authority for Site Plan and Design Review: Homeowners Association Areas), below.
C. Applicable Review Authority
1. Applicable Review Authority
a. The applicable Review Authority shall be as specified in Table 7-4 (Review Authority for Site Plan and Design
Review: Homeowners Association Areas), below. The three levels of review specified in Table 7-4 shall be further
defined as follows:
(1) City Review (Very Minor Review). Review and decision by the Director with no public notice or hearing
required.
i. The Director may instead defer action and refer the application to the HOA Architectural Review Board
(ARB) Chairperson for review under the Short Review process listed below.
(2) Short Review (Minor Review). Review and decision by the HOA ARB Chairperson with no public notice or
hearing required.
i. The HOA ARB Chairperson may instead defer action and refer the application to the Architectural Review
Board for review under the Regular Review process listed below.
(3) Regular Review (Major Review). Review and decision by the HOA Architectural Review Board with public
notice and hearing required, in compliance with Section 9108.13 (Public Notices and Hearings).
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
Table 7-4
Review Authority for Site Plan and Design Review: Homeowners Association Areas
Types of Construction Activity
Review Authority (4)(5)
City Review
(Very Minor
Review)
Short Review
(Minor Review)
Regular Review
(Major Review)
Fences and/or walls (1) (2) Decision
In-Ground Swimming Pools and Spas without water features Decision
In-Ground Swimming Pools and Spas with water features Decision
Roof-mounted solar Decision
Pool and Spa Equipment (3) Decision
Mechanical equipment (3) Decision
Sport courts and related features including but not limited to
fencing and lighting Decision
Single-story remodels and additions Decision
Detached accessory structures - new, additions, and/or
remodels Decision
Above Ground Swimming Pools and Spas Decision
Landscaping and Hardscaping (1) Decision
Fountains, water features, or statues (1) Decision
Ground-mounted solar Decision
Roofing Decision
Façade Improvements on existing structures, including but not
limited to window replacements, paint and/or materials changes,
etc.
Decision
New single-family residence Decision
New second story or second story addition Decision
Notes:
(1) Design Review shall not be required if it is not visible from a public right-of-way.
(2) Design Review shall not be required if it is 2 feet or less in height above the lowest adjacent grade.
(3) If an Administrative Modification is required, review by the Homeowners Association under the Short Review process shall
be required prior to the City processing the Administrative Modification.
(4) Any decision is appealable to the Commission and Council, in compliance with Section 9108.07 (Appeals).
(5) All projects that are not listed to be eligible to be processed under the City Review or Short Review process shall be
processed under the Regular Review process.
9107.20.040 Application Filing, Processing, and Review
A. Application Filing. An application for a Site Plan and Design Review: Homeowners Association Areas shall be filed and
processed in compliance with Section 9107.03 (Application Processing Procedures). The application shall include the
information and materials specified in the most up-to-date Department handout for Design Review in Homeowners
Association Areas, together with the required fee in compliance with the Fee Schedule. It is the responsibility of the
applicant to provide evidence in support of the findings required. Initial review of the application, including time requirements
and requests for information, shall be in compliance with Subsection 9107.03.060 (Initial Application Completeness
Review).
B. Review with Other Land Use Applications. If the project for which the request for Site Plan and Design Review:
Homeowners Association Areas is being made also requires some other discretionary approval by the Development
Services Division (e.g., Certificate of Demolition, Protected Trees, Administrative Modifications, etc.), then the applicant
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
shall submit copies of the requests to the applicable Review Authority for concurrent consideration.
C. Application Review. Each application for a Site Plan and Design Review: Homeowners Association Areas shall be
reviewed to ensure that the application is consistent with the purpose of this Section and adopted Design Guidelines and
policies that may apply.
1. A Site Plan and Design Review: Homeowners Association Areas is initiated when the ARB Chairperson receives a
complete application package including the required information and materials on the Short Review and Regular
Review application, information and materials for other land use applications to be concurrently considered, and any
additional information required by the applicable Review Authority in order to conduct a thorough review of the
proposed project.
2. Upon receipt of a complete application the applicable Review Authority shall review the location, design, site plan
configuration, the items listed under item no. 5 below, and the effect of the proposed development on adjacent
properties by comparing the project plans to the applicable Design Guidelines and policies.
3. During the course of the review process, the Review Authority may require the submittal of additional information or
revised plans. The applicant shall be notified in writing of any revisions or additional information required and shall
submit the requested information to the Review Authority within 90 days following the date of the notice or within the
period of time designated by the Review Authority. Failure to submit the required information by the end of the
business day on the 90th day, or within the period of time designated by the Review Authority, shall cause the Review
Authority to consider the application withdrawn and of no further effect.
4. After the application has been deemed complete, the Review Authority shall either approve or deny the Design Review
application and, if approved, may impose conditions deemed reasonable and necessary to protect the public health,
safety and general welfare and ensure compliance with this Section, adopted Design Guidelines, City Council
Resolution, and various regulations of the City in compliance with Subsection 9107.10.050 (Findings and Decision),
below.
5. The following criteria shall be considered during the review:
a. Compliance with this Section, this Development Code, City Council Resolution, and all other applicable City
regulations and policies;
b. Efficient site layout and design;
c. Compatibility with neighboring properties and developments;
d. Efficiency and safety of public access and parking;
e. The arrangement and relationship of proposed structures and signs to one another and to other developments in
the vicinity and whether the relationship is harmonious and based on good standards of design;
f. The compatibility in scale and aesthetic treatment of proposed structures with public areas;
g. The adequacy of proposed driveways, landscaping, parking spaces, potential on-site and off-site parking and
traffic impacts and other potential impacts upon the environment;
h. Appropriate open space and use of water efficient landscaping;
i. Consistency with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan; and
j. Consistency with any adopted Design Guidelines, policies, and standards.
D. On-Site Inspection. An application may require that the ARB Chairperson, or HOA Architectural Review Board to perform
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
an on-site inspection of the subject parcel before confirming that the request complies with all of the applicable criteria and
provisions identified in this Section.
E. Public Notice, Hearing, and Appeal Provisions
1. City Review and Short Review. Neither a public notice nor public hearing shall be required for the Director’s decision
or the ARB Chairperson’s decision on a City Review or Short Review application.
2. Regular Reviews. A public notice and hearing shall be required for ARB's decision on a Regular Review application.
Notice of the hearing shall be given and the hearing shall be conducted in compliance with Section 9108.13 (Public
Notices and Hearings).
3. Appeals. The Review Authority’s decision may be appealed to the Planning Commission and the City Council, in
compliance with Section 9108.07 (Appeals).
9107.20.050 Findings and Decision
A. Meets Requirements of this Section. The Review Authority shall determine whether or not the application meets the
requirements of this Section in compliance with Subsection 9107.10.060 (Initial Application Completeness Review).
B. Review Authority’s Action.
1. City Review and Short Review. Within 14 calendar days following the filing of the completed application, the
applicable Review Authority shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application.
2. Regular Review. Within 30 calendar days following the filing of the completed application, the applicable Review
Authority shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application.
C. Referral to the Short Review process. If the application submitted for City Review (Very Minor Review) is of significant
consequence or magnitude or involves potential public controversy, the Director may defer action and refer the application
to the ARB Chairperson for review and final decision under the Short Review (Minor Review) process.
D. Referral to the Regular Review process. If the application submitted for Short Review (Minor Review) is of significant
consequence or magnitude or involves potential public controversy, the ARB Chairperson may defer action and refer the
application to the Architectural Review Board for review and final decision under the Regular Review (Major Review)
process.
1. Next ARB Agenda. The referral shall be placed on the agenda of the next available regular ARB meeting following
the referral.
E. Required Findings. The Review Authority may approve an application, only if it first makes finding that the proposed
development will be consistent with the City adopted Design Guidelines.
F. Notice of the Decision.
1. Short Review. Within 10 days after final action by the applicable ARB Chairperson on an application, notice of the
decision form shall be mailed to the applicant at the address shown upon the application, the Development
Services Department, and to all other persons who have filed a written request for notices of decision with the
ARB Chairperson.
2. Regular Review. Within 10 days after final action by the applicable ARB on an application, notice of the decision
and Findings and Action form shall be mailed to the applicant at the address shown upon the application, the
Development Service Department, and to all other persons who have filed a written request for notices of decision
with the ARB.
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
9107.20.060 Conditions of Approval
A. May Impose Conditions. In approving an application, the Review Authority may impose conditions deemed reasonable
and necessary to ensure that the approval would be in compliance with this Section and the findings required by Subsection
9107.20.050 (Findings and Decision), above.
9107.20.070 Issuance of Other Required Permits and Approvals
A. Permits or Approvals for Grading, Structures, and Uses. No permits or approvals shall be issued for any development
involved in an application for a Site Plan and Design Review: Homeowners Association Areas or a revised Site Plan and
Design Review: Homeowners Association Areas until and unless the same shall have become final, in compliance with
Subsection 9108.11.030 (Effective Dates of Permits).
B. Compliance with Site Plan and Design Review Homeowners Association Areas. Grading shall not be commenced and
no structure shall be altered, enlarged, erected, moved, or rebuilt subject to the provisions of this Section, except in
compliance with the approved Site Plan and Design Review: Homeowners Association Areas and the conditions imposed
on the review.
C. Determination by Director. Compliance shall be determined by the Director.
9107.10.080 Minor Changes by ARB Chairperson
The ARB Chairperson may approve minor changes to an approved Regular Review (Major Review) application that do not
involve an increase in structure area or height, a significant architectural change, or an intensity of use in compliance with
Subsection 9108.11.100 (Changes to an Approved Project). The ARB Chairperson may instead defer action and refer the
request back to the Architectural Review Board for review under the Regular Review process in compliance with Subsection
9107.10.030 (Authority), above.
9107.10.090 Post Decision Procedures
The procedures and requirements in Section 9108.11 (Permit Implementation, Time Limits, and Extensions), and those related to
appeals, public notices and hearings, revocation, and enforcement in Division 8 (Development Code Administration) shall apply
following the decision on a Site Plan and Design Review: Homeowners Association Areas application.
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
Division 8:
Development Code Administration
8 x
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
Section 9108.01 – Administrative Responsibility
Subsections:
9108.01.010 Purpose and Intent
9108.01.020 Planning Agency Defined
9108.01.030 City Council
9108.01.040 Planning Commission
9108.01.050 Development Services Department Director
9108.01.010 Purpose and Intent
The purpose of this Section is to describe the authority and responsibilities of the Council, Commission, Director, Architectural
Review Board, Architectural Review Board Chairperson, Department, and Department staff in the administration of this
Development Code.
9108.01.020 Planning Agency Defined
As provided by State law, the Commission is designated as the Planning Agency and as the Advisory Agency, when required or
authorized. The Director shall perform the functions of an Advisory Agency, as assigned, in compliance with State Law.
9108.01.030 City Council
The City Council, referred to in this Development Code as the Council, in matters related to the City's planning process shall
perform the duties and functions prescribed in the Municipal Code and this Development Code, which include the following:
A. Review Authority on Specified Planning Matters. Final decisions on development agreements, Development Code
amendments, General Plan amendments, specific plans and amendments, Zoning Map amendments, environmental
documents related to any of the forgoing, and other applicable policy or regulatory matters related to the City's planning
process as specified in the City Charter, the Municipal Code, and this Development Code;
B. Appeals. The review of appeals filed from Commission decisions; and
C. Compliance. The above listed functions shall be performed in compliance with Table 7-1 (Review Authority), Division 7
(Permit Processing Procedures), and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
9108.01.040 Planning Commission
A. Establishment. The Planning Commission, referred to in this Development Code as the Commission, is hereby
established.
B. Appointment. The Commission shall consist of five members who shall be appointed by the Council in compliance with
Municipal Code Part 5 (Planning Commission) Division 1, and Section 2251 (Membership).
C. Duties and Authority. The Commission shall perform the duties and functions prescribed by the Municipal Code and this
Development Code, and the Council may, from time to time by resolution, prescribe additional powers and duties not
inconsistent with State Law, including the following:
1. The review of development projects, including referrals from the Director;
2. The review of appeals from the Director’s decisions;
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
3. The recommendation, to the Council for final decisions, on development agreements, Development Code
amendments, General Plan amendments, specific plans and amendments, Zoning Map amendments, environmental
documents related to any of the forgoing, and other applicable policy or regulatory matters related to the City's planning
process as specified in the City Charter, the Municipal Code, and this Development Code; and
4. The above listed functions shall be performed in compliance with Table 7-1 (Review Authority), Division 7 (Permit
Processing Procedures), and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
D. Meeting Rules. The Commission shall conduct public hearings and meetings in compliance with the Municipal Code Part
5 and Section 9108.13 (Public Notice and Hearings).
9108.01.050 Development Services Department Director
A. Appointment. The Development Services Department Director, referred to in this Development Code as the Director, shall
be appointed by the City Manager.
B. Definition of the Term "Director." When used in this Development Code or any permit or condition approved in
compliance with this Development Code, the term "Director" shall be as follows and as defined in Division 9 (Definitions):
"The Development Services Department Director, referred to in this Development Code as the ‘Director’ or designee(s) of
the Director."
C. Duties and Authority. The Director shall:
1. Have the responsibility to perform all of the functions designated by State law, including, but not limited to the following:
a. Annual report related to implementation of the General Plan in compliance with Government Code Section 65400;
b. Review of public works projects for conformity to the General Plan in compliance with Government Code Section
65401; and
c. Review of acquisition of property for conformity to the General Plan in compliance with Government Code Section
65402.
2. Perform the duties and functions prescribed in this Development Code, including the review of administrative
development projects, in compliance with Table 7-1 (Review Authority), Division 7 (Permit Processing Procedures),
Government Code Section 65901 et seq., and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA);
3. Perform other responsibilities assigned by the Council, Commission, or City Manager;
4. Delegate the responsibilities of the Director to Department staff under the supervision of the Director; and
5. Serve in an advisory capacity for proposed subdivisions, in compliance with Subdivision Map Act Section 66415 et seq.
In this capacity, the Director is charged with the responsibility of making investigations and reports on the design and
improvement of proposed divisions of real property.
9108.01.060 Homeowners Association Architectural Review Board
A. Appointment. The Homeowners Association Architectural Review Board, referred to in this Development Code as the
Architectural Review Board or ARB, shall be selected in accordance with each Homeowners Association’s adopted by-laws
and any amendments on file with the City Clerk.
B. Definition of the Term “Homeowners Association Architectural Review Board.” When used in this Development Code
or any permit or condition approved in this Development Code, the term “Homeowners Association Architectural Review
Board” shall be as follows and as defined in Division 9 (Definitions): “The Homeowners Association Architectural Review
Board, referred to in this Development Code as the ‘Architectural Review Board’ or ‘ARB’ consists of members appointed in
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
accordance with the by-laws of each City-designated Homeowners Association. The ARB shall be maintained in
accordance with City Council Resolution.”
C. Duties and Authority. The ARB shall:
1. Perform the duties and functions prescribed by this Development Code and City Council Resolution.
2. Provide recommendation to the Director for final decisions on Tree Permits, Administrative Modifications, and other
applicable permits related to the City's planning process as specified in the City Charter, the Municipal Code, and this
Development Code; and
3. Perform the duties and functions prescribed in this Development Code, including the review of administrative
development projects, in compliance with Table 7-4 (Review Authority for Homeowner Association Areas), Division 7
(Permit Processing Procedures), City Council Resolution, Government Code Section 65901 et seq., and the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and
4. Perform other responsibilities assigned by the Council, Commission, City Manager, or Director.
D. Meeting Rules. The ARB shall conduct public hearings and meetings in compliance with Section 9108.13 (Public Notice
and Hearings).
9108.01.070 Homeowners Association Architectural Review Board Chairperson
A. Appointment. The Homeowners Association Architectural Review Board Chairperson, referred to in this Development
Code as the ARB Chairperson, shall be selected in accordance with each Homeowners Association’s adopted by-laws and
any amendments on file with the City Clerk.
B. Definition of the Term “Homeowners Association Architectural Review Board Chairperson.” When used in this
Development Code or any permit or condition approved in this Development Code, the term “Homeowners Association
Architectural Review Board Chairperson” shall be as follows and as defined in Division 9 (Definitions): “The Homeowners
Association Architectural Review Board Chairperson, referred to in this Development Code as the ‘ARB Chairperson’ or
designee(s) of the ARB Chairperson” shall be appointed in accordance with the by-laws of each City-designated
Homeowners Association.”
C. Duties and Authority. The ARB Chairperson shall:
1. Perform the duties and functions prescribed by this Development Code, and City Council Resolution.
2. Perform the duties and functions prescribed in this Development Code, including the review of administrative
development projects, in compliance with Table 7-4 (Review Authority for Homeowner Association Areas), Division 7
(Permit Processing Procedures), City Council Resolution, Government Code Section 65901 et seq., and the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and
3. Perform other responsibilities assigned by the Council, Commission, City Manager, or Director.
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
Section 9108.07 – Appeals
Subsections:
9108.07.010 Purpose and Intent
9108.07.020 Appeal Subjects and Jurisdiction
9108.07.030 Calls for Review
9108.07.040 Filing and Processing of Appeals
9108.07.050 Judicial Review
9108.07.010 Purpose and Intent
This Section establishes procedures for the appeal and calls for review of determinations and decisions of the Director or
Commission.
9108.07.020 Appeal Subjects and Jurisdiction
A. Code Administration and Interpretation. Any determination of the Director and/or Department staff on the meaning or
applicability of the regulations contained in this Development Code that cannot be resolved with the Director, may be
appealed to the Commission and then to the Council:
B. Planning Permit Decisions
1. ARB or ARB Chairperson Decisions. Decisions of the ARB or ARB Chairperson on all matters specified in Section
9108.01.060 (Homeowners Association Architectural Review Board) and 9108.01.070 (Homeowners Association
Architectural Review Board Chairperson) may be appealed to the Commission.
2. Director’s Decisions. Decisions of the Director on all matters specified in Section 9108.01.050 (Development
Services Department Director) may be appealed to the Commission.
3. Commission’s Decisions. Any decision of the Commission may be appealed to the Council.
9108.07.030 Calls for Review
A. Commission or Council Review
1. Commission. The Commission may call for a review of any determination or decision rendered by the Director , ARB,
or Department staff.
2. Council. The Council may call for a review of any determination or decision rendered by the Commission, Director,
ARB, or Department staff.
3. Majority Vote Required. A call for review may only be commenced by the affirmative vote of the majority of the
members present of the applicable Review Authority.
B. Process for Calling for a Review
1. Initiation by Commissioners. Any Commissioner may initiate a call for review of a Director’s determination or
decision by filing a written request with the Department before the effective date of the action, which means within 10
days following the date of the determination or decision.
2. Initiation by Council Members
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
a. Any Council member may initiate a call for review of a Commission’s, or Director’s, or ARB’s determination or
decision by filing a written request with the City Clerk before the effective date of the action, which means within
10 days following the date of the determination or decision.
b. The Council may call for the review of a Director’s or ARB’s determination or decision directly, or may direct the
Commission to first consider the matter and provide a written recommendation to the Council.
3. Consideration of Call for Review. The Commission or Council, as applicable, shall consider the call for review at its
next regularly scheduled meeting.
4. Majority Vote by Review Authority. If the Commission or Council, as applicable, votes to review the determination or
decision, a subsequent review hearing shall be scheduled to consider the merits of the review . Following a majority
vote to proceed, the request shall be treated in compliance with Subsection 9108.07.040 (Filing and Processing of
Appeals).
5. Notice to Applicant. If the Review Authority is reviewing the decision of a discretionary application, the applicant shall
be informed of the aspects of the application and the determination or decision that the Review Authority will consider.
6. Effect of Call for Review
a. A request for a call for review by a member of a Review Authority shall stay the effective date of a determination
or decision until the Review Authority can make a decision on the call for review request.
b. The timely filing of a call for review does not extend the time in which an appeal of a determination or decision
shall be filed. The normal appeal period shall continue to run in compliance with Subparagraph 9108.07.040 B.
(Form and Timing of an Appeal), below.
c. If the Review Authority decides to call for review of the subject determination or decision, then the previous
determination or decision shall be stayed.
d. If the Review Authority decides not to call for review the subject determination or decision, then the determination
or decision shall become final unless the appeal period has not expired.
7. Filing of an Appeal Pending a Call for Review
a. Right to File an Appeal. Any person may file a timely appeal in compliance with this Section even though a call
for review has been filed in compliance with this Section.
b. Effect of Filing an Appeal. The filing of the appeal shall serve to protect the rights of the appellant(s) in the
event the call for review is subsequently withdrawn or rejected.
8. Withdrawal or Failure of a Call for Review. If a request for a call for review is withdrawn after filing, or is rejected,
the remaining days of the call for review period shall run until the original 10-day period has expired.
9. Notice and Public Hearing
a. A call for review hearing shall be a public hearing if the original determination or decision required a public
hearing.
b. Notice of the public hearing shall be the same as the original determination or decision, in compliance with
Section 9108.13 (Public Notices and Hearings).
c. The public hearing shall be conducted in compliance with Section 9108.13 (Public Notices and Hearings).
10. Fees Not Required. Fees shall not be required in conjunction with the filing of a call for review.
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
11. Required Votes. The final action calling for review of a determination or decision shall require an affirmative majority
vote of those members lawfully authorized to vote on the matter.
C. Concurrent Commission Recommendations. When the Commission makes a recommendation to the Council on a
legislative matter (e.g., development agreement, Development Code amendment, General Plan amendment, specific plan
or amendment, or Zoning Map amendment), any concurrent companion decision(s) by the Commission on an approval,
permit, or Variance, or other non-legislative land use permit application concerning, in whole or in part, the same parcel(s)
shall also be deemed to be timely called up for review by the Council.
9108.07.040 Filing and Processing of Appeals
A. Eligibility
1. Eligible Appellants. An appeal in compliance with this Section may be filed by any interested person(s).
2. Interested Person(s). For purposes of this Section an interested person(s) is a person who informed the City of his or
her concerns about an application for a permit or approval at a public hearing, either in person or through a
representative, or by other appropriate means (e.g., in writing), or was unable to do so for good cause and pays the
applicable fee in compliance with the Fee Schedule; and
a. Objects to the action taken on the permit or approval;
b. Completes the required City appeal form completely and accurately. The appeal will not be deemed complete
and timely filed until all information on the appeal form is verified by the office receiving the appeal form; and
c. Wishes to appeal any appealable action to a higher Review Authority.
3. Appeals by Councilmember or Commissioner. Any action or decision by the Commission, Director, ARB, ARB
Chairperson, or Department staff rendered in compliance with this Development Code may be appealed by a
Councilmember or Commissioner acting as an individual, in compliance with the requirements of the Fair Political
Practices Act.
4. Shall Not Be Authorized to Participate. Any Councilmember or Commissioner filing an appeal as an individual shall
not be authorized to participate in any decision concerning that action or decision.
B. Form and Timing of Appeal. An appeal shall be submitted in writing and shall specifically state the pertinent facts and the
basis for the appeal.
1. Pertinent Facts and the Basis for the Appeal. The pertinent facts and the basis for the appeal shall include, at a
minimum, the specific grounds for the appeal, where there was an error or abuse of discretion by the previous Review
Authority (e.g., Commission, Director, ARB, ARB Chairperson, or other City official) in the consideration and action on
the matter being appealed, and/or where the decision was not supported by the evidence on the record. Appeals filed
by a City official, a Commissioner, or a Councilmember shall be exempt from the requirements of this Subparagraph.
2. Shall be Filed within 10 Days. The appeal shall be filed with the Department or City Clerk, as applicable, within 10
days following the actual date the decision was rendered.
a. Appeals addressed to the Commission shall be filed with the Department; and
a. Appeals addressed to the Council shall be filed with Planning Services. the City Clerk.
3. Accompanied by Filing Fee. The appeal shall be accompanied by the filing fee identified in the Fee Schedule.
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
4. Suspension of Action. Once an appeal is filed, any action on the associated project is suspended until the appeal is
processed and a final decision is rendered by the applicable Review Authority.
C. Scope of Planning Permit Appeals. An appeal of a decision on any planning permit specified in Division 7 (Permit
Processing Procedures) shall be de novo, and shall not be limited to issues raised at the public hearing, or in writing before
the hearing, or information that was not known at the time of the decision that is being appealed.
D. Report and Scheduling of Hearing
1. When an appeal has been filed, the Director shall prepare a report on the matter, including all of the application
materials in question, and schedule the matter for a public hearing by the appropriate Review Authority identified in
Subsection 9108.07.020 (Appeal Subjects and Jurisdiction), above.
2. Notice of the hearing shall be provided, and the hearing shall be conducted, in compliance with Section 9108.13
(Public Notice and Hearings).
3. Any interested party may appear and be heard regarding the appeal.
E. Decision
1. During the appeal hearing, the Review Authority may:
a. Affirm, affirm in part, modify, or reverse the action, determination, or decision that is the subject of the appeal,
based upon findings of fact about the particular case. The findings shall identify the reasons for the action on the
appeal, and verify the compliance or noncompliance of the subject of the appeal with this Development Code;
b. Adopt additional or different project aspects or conditions of approval, that may address issues or concerns other
than the subject of the appeal;
c. Deny the planning permit approved by the previous Review Authority, even where the appellant only requested a
modification or elimination of one or more project aspects or conditions of approval; or
d. If new or different evidence is presented on appeal, the Review Authority may refer the matter to the Director or
Commission, as applicable, for further consideration.
e. The decision of the Council shall be final.
2. Within 60 days following the initial public hearing, the Review Authority shall render its decision on the appeal, unless it
is continued for good cause.
3. In the event of a tie vote by the Review Authority on an appeal, the decision being appealed shall stand.
F. Provision of Notice of Decision
1. Following the final decision on an appeal of a permit or other approval required by this Development Code, the City
shall provide notice of its final decision to the appellant, applicant, property owner or owner’s representative, and to any
person who specifically requested notice of the City’s final decision.
2. The notice of the final decision shall contain applicable findings, conditions of approval, and the reporting/monitoring
requirements deemed necessary to mitigate any impacts and protect the public convenience, health, interest, safety, or
general welfare of the City.
G. Effective Date of Appeal Decision. No permit or license shall be issued for any use involved in an appeal until the final
decision on the application shall have become final in the following manner:
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
1. Commission’s Decision. A decision by the Commission is final and effective after 5:00 p.m. the end of the business
day on the 10th day following the actual date the final decision is rendered, if no appeal to the decision has been filed
with the Council or called up by the Council.
2. Council’s Decision
a. Adopted by Ordinance. A decision of the Council adopted by ordinance is final and shall become effective on
the 31st day following the date the ordinance is actually adopted by the Council, unless otherwise provided in the
adopting ordinance.
b. Adopted by Resolution. A decision of the Council adopted by resolution is final and shall be effective on the
date the decision is rendered.
9108.07.050 Judicial Review
No person shall seek judicial review of a City decision on a planning permit or other matter in compliance with this Development
Code unless and until all available appeals to the Commission and Council have been first exhausted in compliance with this
Section.
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
This page intentionally left blank.
Section 9108.09 – Permit Modifications and Revocations
Subsections:
9108.09.010 Purpose and Intent
9108.09.020 Modifications
9108.09.030 Revocations
9108.09.040 Findings to Modify or Revoke
9108.09.050 Notice and Hearing Required
9108.09.060 Appeals
9108.09.010 Purpose and Intent
This Section provides procedures for securing punitive modification or revocation of previously approved permits or approvals.
9108.09.020 Modifications
The City’s action to modify a permit or approval, instead of revocation, may include conditioning any operational aspect of the
project, including buffers, duration of the permit or entitlement, hours of operation, landscaping and maintenance, outdoor
lighting, parking, performance guarantees, property maintenance, signs, surfacing, traffic circulation, or any other
aspect/condition determined to be reasonable and necessary to ensure that the permit or approval is operated in a manner
consistent with the original findings for approval.
9108.09.030 Revocations
The City’s action to revoke a permit or approval, instead of modification, shall have the effect of terminating the permit or
approval and denying the privileges granted by the original approval.
9108.09.040 Findings to Modify or Revoke
A. Permits. A Conditional Use Permit, Minor Use Permit, or other City planning permit or approval (except a Variance or
Administrative Modification, see Subsection B., below) may be modified or revoked by the Review Authority (e.g ., ARB
Chairperson, ARB, Director, Commission, or Council) that originally approved the permit, if the Review Authority first makes
any one of the following findings:
1. Circumstances under which the permit or approval was granted have been changed by the applicant to an extent that
one or more of the findings that justified the original approval can no longer be made, and the improvement/use has
become detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare, or constitutes or is creating a nuisance;
2. The permit or other approval was granted, in whole or in part, on the basis of a fraud, misrepresentation, or omission of
a material statement in the application, or in the applicant’s testimony presented during the public hearing, for the
permit or approval;
3. One or more of the conditions of the original permit or approval have not been substantially fulfilled or have been
violated and/or the permit is in violation of any code, law, ordinance, regulation, or statute;
4. The approved use or structure has not been exercised within 12 months of the date of approval in compliance with
Subsection 9108.11.080 (Expiration);
5. The approved use or structure has ceased to exist or has been suspended for a period in excess of 12 months; or
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
7. The improvement/use allowed by the permit or approval has become detrimental to the public health, safety, or general
welfare or the manner of operation constitutes or is creating a nuisance.
B. Variances and Administrative Modifications. A Variance or Administrative Modification may be modified or revoked by
the Review Authority which originally approved the Variance or Administrative Modification, if the Review Authority first
makes any one of the following findings, in addition to any one of the findings specified in Subsection A., above:
1. Circumstances under which the original approval was granted have been changed by the applicant to a degree that
one or more of the findings contained in the original approval can no longer be made, and the grantee has not
substantially exercised the rights granted by the Variance or Administrative Modification; or
2. One or more of the conditions of the Variance or Administrative Modification have not been met, or have been violated,
and the grantee has not substantially exercised the rights granted by the Variance or Administrative Modification in
compliance with Subsection 9108.11.080 (Expiration).
9108.09.050 Notice and Hearing Required
A. Hearing. The appropriate Review Authority shall hold a public hearing to modify or revoke a permit or approval granted in
compliance with the provisions of this Development Code. The hearing shall be noticed and conducted in compliance with
Section 9108.13 (Public Notices and Hearings).
B. Notice. At least 10 days before the public hearing, notice shall be mailed or delivered to the owner as shown on the
County's current equalized assessment roll and to the project applicant, if not the owner of the subject property, for which
the permit or approval was granted. The only exception to the 10-day notice provision shall be for Temporary Use Permits
which, because of their short term nature, shall only require a 24-hour notice.
9108.09.060 Appeals
A. The decision of the Director, ARB, or ARB Chairperson may be appealed to the Commission and the decision of the
Commission may be appealed to the Council, in compliance with Section 9108.07 (Appeals). The decision of the Council
shall be final.
B. A public hearing shall be required for the appeal of a decision to modify or revoke a permit or approval. Notice of the
hearing shall be given and the hearing shall be conducted in compliance with Section 9108.13 (Public Notices and
Hearings).
C. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Review Authority may sustain the previous Review Authority’s decision to modify or
revoke the permit or approval, or overturn the decision and order reinstatement of the permit or approval.
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
Section 9108.11 – Permit Implementation, Time Limits, and Extensions
9108.11.010 Purpose and Intent
9108.11.020 Conformation to Approved Plans
9108.11.030 Effective Dates of Permits
9108.11.040 Acknowledgement and Acceptance of Conditions
9108.11.050 Applications Deemed Approved
9108.11.060 Permits to Run with the Land
9108.11.070 Performance Guarantees
9108.11.080 Expiration
9108.11.090 Time Extensions
9108.11.100 Changes to an Approved Project
9108.11.010 Purpose and Intent
This Section provides requirements for the implementation or "exercising" of the permits or approvals required by this
Development Code, including time limits and procedures for approving extensions of time.
9108.11.020 Conformation to Approved Plans
A. Compliance. All work performed under a Building Permit, Encroachment Permit, or Grading Permit for which project
drawings and plans have received approval by the Director, Department staff, Commission, or Council shall be in
compliance with the approved drawings and plans, and any conditions of approval imposed by the Review Authority.
B. Changes. Changes to an approved project shall be submitted and processed in compliance with Subsection 9108.11.100
(Changes to an Approved Project), below.
C. Effect of Development Code Amendments on Projects in Progress. The enactment of this Development Code, or an
amendment to this Development Code, may have the effect of imposing different standards on a new land use than those
that applied to existing development. (For example, this Development Code or a future amendment could specify different
landscaping requirements than specified by the former regulations.) The following provisions determine how the
requirements of this Development Code will apply to a development project that is in progress at the time this Development
Code or an amendment goes into effect.
1. Application Deemed Complete. A planning permit application (Division 7 [Permit Processing Procedures]), which
has been deemed complete by the Director before the effective date of this Development Code or any amendment,
shall be processed in compliance with the requirements in effect when the application was deemed complete.
2. Project Under Construction. A project for which a Building Permit has been issued under the provisions of earlier
ordinances of the City which are in conflict with this Development Code, and on which substantial construction has
been performed by integration of materials on the site before the effective date of this Development Code, may be
continued and completed in compliance with the plans and specifications upon which the permit was originally issued.
3. Subdivision Maps. Subdivision maps shall be processed in compliance with the Subdivision Map Act (Government
Code Section 66410 et seq.) and Division 5 (Subdivisions).
9108.11.030 Effective Dates of Permits
A. Approvals, Permits, and Variances. An Administrative Modification, Certificates of Demolition, Conditional Use Permit,
Home Occupation Permit, Minor Use Permit, Planned Development Permit, Reasonable Accommodation, Site Plan and
Design Review, Site Plan and Design Review: Homeowners Association Areas, Temporary Use Permit, or Variance shall
become effective 10 days following the actual date the decision was rendered by the applicable Review Authority.
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
B. Plans/Amendments
1. Council actions to adopt or amend a development agreement, this Development Code, a specific plan, or the Zoning
Map shall become effective on the 31st day following the date the ordinance is actually adopted by the Council. For
example, an ordinance adopted on October 1st will actually be effective on November 1st, unless otherwise provided in
the adopting ordinance.
2. Council actions to adopt or amend the General Plan shall become effective on the actual date the decision is rendered
by the Council, unless otherwise provided in the adopting resolution.
C. Issued on the Effective Date. Permits, certificates, and/or other approvals shall not be issued until the effective date, and
then only if no appeal of the Review Authority's decision has been filed, in compliance with Section 9108.03 (Appeals).
9108.11.040 Acknowledgement and Acceptance of Conditions
A. Full Understanding and Acceptance. The applicant, upon receipt of the approved copy of the permit with attached
conditions, shall execute an Acknowledgment and Acceptance of Conditions agreement with the City, certifying full
understanding and acceptance of the final conditions of approval.
B. Signed and Dated. The applicant shall return the Acknowledgment and Acceptance of Conditions agreement to the
Department, properly signed and dated, within 30 days following the date of the Acknowledgement.
C. Appeal. If the applicant wishes to appeal any or all of the final conditions of approval, the applicant shall file an appeal
within 10 days following the actual date the decision was rendered by the applicable Review Authority in compliance with
Section 9108.07 (Appeals).
D. New Owner’s or Tenant’s Responsibility. Any new owner or tenant taking over an existing business’s Conditional Use
Permit or Minor Use Permit shall be required to sign and submit an Acknowledgment and Acceptance of Conditions stating
they have been given a copy of the conditions of approval and accept them, before they are issued a new Business License
for the subject business.
9108.11.050 Applications Deemed Approved
A. Applicable Provisions. Any application deemed approved by operation of law in compliance with Government Code
Section 65956(b) shall be subject to all applicable provisions of this Development Code, which shall be fully satisfied by the
applicant before a Building Permit is issued or a land use not requiring a Building Permit is exercised or established.
B. Public Hearing. The application shall be deemed approved only if the application received proper notice in compliance
with Section 9108.13 (Public Notice and Hearings) and Government Code Section 65956(b).
9108.11.060 Permits to Run with the Land
A. Run with the Land. An Administrative Modification, Conditional Use Permit, Minor Use Permit, Planned Development
Permit, Site Plan and Design Review, Site Plan and Design Review: Homeowners Association Areas, Temporary Use
Permit, or Variance approval that is approved in compliance with Section 9107.03 (Application Processing Procedures) shall
be deemed to run with the land through any change of ownership of the subject site, from the effective date of the permit,
except in any case where a permit expires and becomes void in compliance with Subsection 9108.11.080 (Expiration),
below.
B. Conditions Shall Apply. All applicable conditions of approval shall continue to apply after a change in property ownership.
9108.11.070 Performance Guarantees
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
A. Deposit of Security
1. As a condition of approval of an Administrative Modification, Conditional Use Permit, Home Occupation Permit, Minor
Use Permit, Planned Development Permit, Site Plan and Design Review, Site Plan and Design Review: Homeowners
Association Areas, Temporary Use Permit, or Variance, upon a finding that the City's health, safety, and general
welfare warrant, the Review Authority may require the execution of a covenant to deposit security and the deposit of
security in a reasonable amount and form approved by the City Attorney to ensure the faithful performance of one or
more of the conditions of approval of the permit or Variance in the event that the obligor fails to perform.
2. The applicant/owner may offer to provide adequate security for the faithful performance of a condition(s) of approval
imposed as part of the approval process if the Director determines that the condition(s) may be implemented at a later
specified date (e.g., inability to install required landscaping due to weather conditions).
3. The security shall, as required by law or otherwise, be in a form approved by the City Attorney.
4. The security shall remain in effect until all of the secured conditions have been performed to the satisfaction of the
Director in conjunction with the City Engineer.
5. Security required in compliance with this Section shall be payable to the City.
B. Release of Security. Upon satisfactory compliance with all applicable provisions of this Section, the security deposit shall
be released.
C. Failure to Comply
1. Upon failure to perform any secured condition, the City may perform the condition, or cause it to be done, and may
collect from the obligor all costs incurred, including administrative, engineering, legal, and inspection costs.
2. Any unused portion of the security shall be refunded to the obligor after deduction of the cost of the work.
3. Any cost in excess of the security shall be an obligation of the applicant/owner and a lien on the property benefitted by
the provisions of this Subsection.
4. To the extent that the Director can demonstrate that the obligor willfully breached an obligation in a manner that the
obligor knew, or should have known, would create irreparable harm to the City, the entire amount of the security may
be withheld.
5. The Director's determination may be appealed to the Council by the obligor by filing an appeal with the City Clerk within
10 days following the decision to withhold the security, in compliance with Section 9108.07 (Appeals).
9108.11.080 Expiration
A. Expiration of Permit or Approval. Unless otherwise specified in the permit or approval, any discretionary permit issued by
the City, including, without limitation, any Administrative Modification, Conditional Use Permit, Home Occupation Permit,
Minor Use Permit, Planned Development Permit, Site Plan and Design Review, Site Plan and Design Review: Homeowners
Association Areas, Temporary Use Permit, or Variance, shall comply with the following expiration provisions. See Division 5
(Subdivisions) for expirations related to subdivision maps.:
1. Exercised
a. To ensure continued compliance with the provisions of this Development Code, the permit or approval shall be
exercised by the applicant within 12 months following the date of final approval, unless otherwise specified in the
permit or approval, or an extension is approved by the applicable Review Authority, in compliance with Subsection
9108.11.090 (Time Extensions). In the event the permit or approval has not been fully exercised in that time
period, the permit or approval shall expire and be deemed void (vs. shall be subject to review by the Review
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
Authority who originally granted the permit or approval to determine whether a good faith intent to exercise the
permit or approval has been demonstrated).
b. Additionally, if after construction has started, commencement work is discontinued for a period of 12 months, or
the proposed use is discontinued for a period of 12 months, the permit or approval shall be subject to review by
the Review Authority who originally granted the permit or approval to determine whether a good faith intent to
commence the contemplated use or development granted by the permit or approval has been demonstrated.
2. Phasing
a. Where the permit or approval provides for development in two or more phases or units in sequence, the permit or
approval shall not be approved until the Review Authority has approved the final phasing plan for the entire project
site. The project applicant shall not be allowed to develop one phase in compliance with the preexisting base
zone and then develop the remaining phases in compliance with this Subsection, without prior Review Authority
approval.
b. Pre-approved phases
(1) If a project is to be built in pre-approved phases, each subsequent phase shall have 12 months
following the previous phase's date of construction commencement to the next phase's date of
construction commencement to have occurred, unless otherwise specified in the permit or approval, and
the permit or approval shall be subject to review by the Review Authority who originally granted the
permit or approval to determine whether a good faith intent to commence the contemplated use or
development granted by the permit or approval exists.
(2) If the application for the permit or approval also involves the approval of a tentative map, the phasing
shall be consistent with the tentative map and the permit or approval shall be exercised before the
expiration of the associated tentative map.
3. Definition of “Exercise” and Evidence of “Good Faith”. The following shall be a non-exclusive list of factors that
the Review Authority may consider when determining whether or not a good faith intent to exercise the permit or
approval has been demonstrated:
a. Whether the applicant has submitted plans in Building Services plan-check.
b. Whether the applicant has obtained a Building or Grading Permit.
c. Whether the applicant has diligently continued the approved grading and construction activities in a timely manner
in compliance with the subject Building Permit.
d. Whether the applicant has actually implemented the allowed land use, in its entirety, on the subject property in
compliance with the conditions of approval.
4. Procedure for Determination
a. The determination of whether or not a good faith intent to exercise the permit or approval has been demonstrated,
as specified in Subparagraph 3., above, shall be made by the original Review Authority. following If a public
hearing is required, noticing shall be ed and conducted in compliance with Section 9108.13 (Public Notice and
Hearings)and 9108.11.090 (Time Extensions), below.
Exception: The determination of whether or not good faith intent to exercise the approval has been
demonstrated, as specified in Subparagraph 3., above, for approvals issued in compliance with
Subsection 9107.10 (Site Plan and Design Review: Homeowners Association Areas) shall be made by
the original Review Authority.
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
b. At the public hearing, the applicable Review Authority shall investigate the facts bearing on each case and render
its decision in writing within 30 days following the date of the first hearing, unless continued for further
investigation, study, or hearing.
c. The applicable Review Authority shall cause to be served on the applicant, and if different, the property owner, its
written decision, in compliance with Subparagraph 9107.03.080 F (Notice of the Decision).
d. The decision of the applicable Review Authority shall be final following a 10-day appeal period, unless appealed to
the applicable Review Authority in compliance with Section 9108.03 (Appeals).
5. Burden of Proof. It shall be the applicant’s burden to prove to the applicable Review Authority, by a preponderance of
the evidence, that, no later than the date that the City delivered the public notice required by Section 9108.13 (Public
Notice and Hearings), a good faith intent to exercise the permit or approval has been demonstrated.
B. Effect of Expiration. If the applicable Review Authority who originally granted the permit or approval determines that a
good faith intent to exercise the permit or approval has not been demonstrated, the Review Authority shall deem the permit
or approval expired and void. Thereafter, the following provisions shall control:
1. No further action is required by the City;
2. No further reliance may be placed on the previously approved permit or approval;
3. The applicant shall have no rights previously granted under the permit or approval;
4. The applicant shall be required to file a new application(s) with all required fees and obtain all required approvals
before any further construction can commence or any use may be implemented; and
5. Any security provided by the applicant under the previously approved permit or approval may be utilized by the City to
provide suitable protection from any harm that may result from the terminated development or use.
9108.11.090 Time Extensions
Requests for a time extension for a permit or approval shall be filed and processed in the following manner:
A. Filed Before Expiration.
1. The applicant’s written request for an extension of time shall be on file with the Department before expiration of the
permit or approval, together with the filing fee required by the Fee Schedule.
2. Exception: For Homeowners Association Area the applicant’s written request for an extension of time shall be on file
with the ARB Chairperson before expiration of the permit or approval.
B. Public Hearing Requirements
1. A public hearing shall not be required for the Director’s decision on an extension of time.
2. However, the Director may conduct a public hearing in compliance with Section 9108.13 (Public Notice and Hearings)
if deemed appropriate by the Director.
3. A public hearing shall be required for the Commission’s decision on an extension of time or the Council’s decision if an
appeal of the Commission’s decision has been filed. The request for extension shall be noticed and the hearing shall
be conducted in compliance with Section 9108.13 (Public Notice and Hearings).
4. Exception: For Homeowners Association Area:
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
a. A public hearing shall not be required for the ARB Chairperson’s decision on an extension of time.
b. The ARB Chairperson may, if deemed appropriate, defer action and refer the application to the Architectural
Review Board for review under the Regular Review process and require a public hearing in compliance with
Section 9108.13 (Public Notice and Hearings).
c. A public hearing shall be required for the ARB’s decision on an extension of time. The request for extension shall
be noticed and the hearing shall be conducted in compliance with Section 9108.13 (Public Notice and Hearings).
C. Suspension of Expiration
1. The filing of a written extension request shall suspend the actual expiration of the permit or approval until the extension
request has been acted upon by the ARB, ARB Chairperson, Director, Commission, and/or Council.
2. Building or Grading Permits shall not be issued in compliance with the permit or approval during the period of the
suspension.
D. Director’s Action on First Extension
1. Upon good cause shown, an extension may be approved, approved with modifications, or denied by the ARB, ARB
Chairperson, or Director, subject to the findings identified in Subsection F (Required findings), below.
2. The Director may defer action and refer the request to the Commission for consideration and final action.
3. The ARB, ARB Chairperson, and Director’s decision may be appealed to the Commission and then the Council, in
compliance with Section 9108.03 (Appeals).
4. The permit or approval may be extended for a maximum of 12-months beyond the expiration date of the original
approval, unless otherwise allowed by State law.
E. Commission’s Action on Subsequent Extension
1. Upon good cause shown, an additional extension may be approved, approved with modifications, or denied by the
Commission, subject to the findings identified in Subsection F(Required Findings), below.
2. The Commission’s decision may be appealed to the Council, in compliance with Section 9108.03 (Appeals).
3. The permit or approval may be extended for one additional 12-month period, unless otherwise allowed by State law,
following the expiration of the original 12 (vs. 24) month period of approval, for a grand total of 48 months following the
original date of approval (original 24 months, plus 12 months by the Director, and 12 more months by the
Commission).
F. Required Findings. An extension of the permit or approval may be granted only if the applicable Review Authority first
makes all of the following findings:
1. There have been no changes in circumstances or law that would preclude the Review Authority from making the
findings upon which the original approval was based; and
2. Appropriate evidence has been provided by the applicant to document that:
a. A good faith intent to exercise the permit or approval has been demonstrated; and
b. The extension is required due to an unusual hardship that was not the result of personal action(s) undertaken by
the applicant.
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
9108.11.100 Changes to an Approved Project
A. Application
1. A development or new land use allowed through an Administrative Modification, Conditional Use Permit, Home
Occupation Permit, Minor Use Permit, Planned Development Permit, Site Plan and Design Review, Site Plan and
Design Review: Homeowners Association Areas, Temporary Use Permit, or Variance shall be implemented in
substantial compliance with the approved drawings and plans, and any conditions of approval imposed by the Review
Authority, except where changes to the project are approved in compliance with this Subsection.
2. An applicant shall request desired changes in writing to the Director, and shall also furnish appropriate supporting
materials and an explanation of the reasons for the request.
Exception: For Site Plan and Design Review: Homeowners Association Areas applications, an applicant shall request
desired changes in writing to the ARB Chairperson and shall also furnish appropriate supporting materials and an
explanation of the reasons for the request.
3. Requested changes may involve changes to the project (e.g., days or hours of operation) as originally proposed by the
applicant or approved by the Review Authority.
4. Requested changes may also involve changes to one or more conditions imposed by the Review Authority, but only
when actual changes to the project would justify a change to one or more conditions of approval.
5. Changes shall not be implemented until first approved by the applicable Review Authority in compliance with this
Subsection, and may be requested either before or after construction or establishment and operation of the approved
use.
B. Notice and Hearing. If the project application originally required a noticed public hearing, the Review Authority shall hold a
public hearing, except for the minor changes outlined below (See Subsection C, Minor Changes by Director.), and shall give
notice, in compliance with Section 9108.13 (Public Notice and Hearings).
C. Minor Changes by an ARB Chairperson or Director. The ARB Chairperson or Director may authorize minor changes to
an approved site plan, architecture, or the nature of the approved use only if the changes:
1. Are consistent with all applicable provisions of this Development Code and are in substantial compliance with the
original approval; and
2. Do not involve a feature of the project that was:
a. A basis for findings in a Negative Declaration, Mitigated Negative Declaration, or Environmental Impact Report for
the project, or determining that the project was exempt from CEQA review;
b. A basis for conditions of approval for the project; or
c. A specific consideration by the Review Authority (e.g., the Director, Commission, or Council) in granting the permit
or approval.
D. Major Changes. Major changes include changes to the project involving features specifically described in Subparagraph C.
2., above, and shall only be approved by the Review Authority (e.g., original or appeal Review Authority that rendered the
final City action on the application) through a new application, processed in compliance with this Development Code.
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
This page intentionally left blank.
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
Section 9108.13 – Public Notices and Hearings
9108.13.010 Purpose and Intent
9108.13.020 Noticing Requirements
9108.13.030 Scheduling of Hearing
9108.13.040 Hearing Procedures
9108.13.050 Recommendation by Commission
9108.13.060 Decision and Notice
9108.13.070 Effective Date of Decision
9108.13.010 Purpose and Intent
This Section provides procedures for public hearings required by this Development Code. When a public hearing is required,
advance notice of the hearing shall be given, and the hearing shall be conducted, in compliance with this Section.
9108.13.020 Noticing Requirements
When this Development Code requires a public hearing before a decision on a permit, or for another matter, the public shall be
provided notice of the hearing in compliance with Government Code Sections 65090, 65091, 65094, 65096, and 66451.3, and
Public Resources Code 21000 et seq., and as required by this Section.
A. Content of Notice. Notice of a public hearing shall include all of the following information, as applicable.
1. Hearing Information. The date, time, and place of the hearing and the name of the Review Authority; a brief
description of the City's general procedure concerning the conduct of hearings and decisions (e.g., the public’s right to
appear and be heard); and the phone number and street address of the Department, where an interested person could
call or visit to obtain additional information.
2. Project Information. The date of filing and the name of the applicant; the City's file number assigned to the
application; a general explanation of the matter to be considered; and a general description, in text or by diagram, of
the location of the property that is the subject of the hearing.
3. Statement on Environmental Document. If a proposed Negative Declaration, Mitigated Negative Declaration, final
Environmental Impact Report, or statement of exemption from the requirements of CEQA has been prepared for the
project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City’s CEQA Guidelines, the
hearing notice shall include a statement that the Review Authority will also consider approval (or recommendation of
adoption/approval for an application requiring Council action) of the proposed Negative Declaration, Mitigated Negative
Declaration, certification of the final Environmental Impact Report, or statement of exemption.
4. Statement Regarding Challenges of City Actions. A notice substantially stating all of the following: "If you
challenge the (nature of the proposed action) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone
else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the (public entity
conducting the hearing) at, or before, the public hearing" in compliance with Government Code Section 65009(b)(2).
5. Statement Regarding Commission’s Recommendations. For Council items that involve a recommendation from
the Commission (e.g., legislative acts) the notice shall contain the Commission’s recommendations.
B. Method of Notice Distribution. Notice of a public hearing required by this Section, and any other type of notice specified
in Division 7 (Permit Processing Procedures), shall be given as follows, as required by Government Code Sections 65090
and 65091.
1. Mailing. Notice shall be mailed or delivered not less than 10 days before the scheduled hearing to the following:
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
a. Project Site Owners, Agent(s), and Applicant. The owners of the property being considered in the application,
the owners' agent(s), and the applicant, in addition to the owner(s) of the mineral rights for maps in compliance
with Government Code Section 65091(a)(2);
b. Local Agencies. Each local agency expected to provide roads, schools, sewage, streets, water, or other
essential facilities or services to the property which is the subject of the application, whose ability to provide those
facilities and services may be significantly affected;
c. Affected owners. All owners of real property as shown on the latest assessment rolls of the City or of the County,
located within a radius of 300 feet, or a different radius as specified in the actual permit requirements of Division 7
(Permit Processing Procedures), of the exterior boundaries of the parcel that is the subject of the hearing; and any
other person whose property might, in the judgment of the Director, be affected by the proposed project; and
d. Persons Requesting Notice. Any person who has filed a written request for notice with the Director or City Clerk
and has paid the required fee for the notice.
2. Alternative to Mailing. If the number of property owners to whom notice would be mailed in compliance with
Subparagraph B. 1., above is more than 1,000, the Director may choose to provide the alternative notice allowed by
Government Code Section 65091(a)(3).
3. Additional Notice. In addition to the types of notice required above, the Director may require any additional notice
with content or using a distribution method (e.g., posting on the City’s web site) as the Director determines is
necessary or desirable.
9108.13.030 Scheduling of Hearing
After the completion of any environmental document required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City’s
CEQA Guidelines, and a Department staff report, a matter requiring a public hearing shall be scheduled on the next available
agenda (ARB, Director, Commission, or Council, as applicable) reserved for public hearings, but no sooner than any minimum
time period established by State law.
Exception: A staff report shall not be required prior to scheduling a public hearing for applications requiring a public hearing
under Section 9107.10 (Design Review: Homeowners Association Areas).
9108.13.040 Hearing Procedures
A. Time and Place of Hearing. A hearing shall be held at the date, time, and place for which notice was given.
B. Continued Hearing. Any hearing may be continued from time to time without further notice; provided that the chair of the
hearing body announces the date, time, and place to which the hearing will be continued before the adjournment or recess
of the hearing.
C. Deferral of Final Decision
1. The Review Authority may announce a tentative decision, and defer its action on a final decision until appropriate
findings and/or conditions of approval have been prepared.
2. The date of the final action shall be as described in the motion, ordinance, or resolution that incorporates the findings
and/or conditions.
D. Summary Information. A summary of all pertinent testimony offered at a public hearing, together with the names and
addresses of all persons testifying shall be recorded and made a part of the permanent files of the case.
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
E. Formal Rules of Evidence or Procedure Not Applicable. Formal rules of evidence or procedure applicable in judicial
actions and proceedings shall not apply in any proceeding subject to this Development Code, except as otherwise required
by the City Charter or the Municipal Code, in compliance with Government Code Section 65010.
9108.13.050 Recommendation by Commission
A. Recommendation and Findings to the Council. After a public hearing on a proposed amendment to this Development
Code, the General Plan, the Zoning Map, a development agreement, or a specific plan, the recommendation and findings of
the Commission shall be forwarded to the Council.
B. Recommendation and Findings to the Applicant. The recommendation and findings shall be mailed to the applicant at
the address shown on the application.
C. Recommendation Included in Notice. The recommendation shall be included in the required notice of the Council’s
public hearing.
9108.13.060 Decision and Notice
Amended by Ord. No. 2347
A. Decision
1. The Review Authority may announce and record its decision on the matter being considered at the conclusion of a
scheduled hearing, or defer action and continue the matter to a later meeting agenda in compliance with Subsection
9108.13.040 (Hearing Procedure), above.
2. Unless otherwise required by law (i.e., votes by the Commission on a General Plan amendment in compliance with
Government Code Section 65354), a majority vote shall be required for any formal action by the applicable Review
Authority.
3. Tie votes of the Review Authority for all matters that legally require the adoption of an ordinance, a resolution, or
findings shall result in no action by the Review Authority. The motion shall fail to pass and the matter shall terminate
any further action by the City until a majority vote of the quorum is achieved.
4. Within 35 days following the conclusion of a public hearing upon any matter, the Commission shall render its decision
by formal resolution reciting the findings upon which the decision is based. The failure of the Commission to render a
decision within the time specified shall cause the entire matter automatically to be referred to the Council without
recommendation for action as it deems warranted under the circumstances. In this event, the Secretary of the
Commission shall immediately deliver to the Council all of the records in the matter.
5. At the conclusion of a hearing conducted by the Director, the Director may instead refer the matter to the Commission
for review and final decision.
6. All decisions shall be in writing and, if required by law, shall contain the written findings upon which the decision is
based.
7. The decision of the Council on any matter shall be final and conclusive.
B. Notice of Decision: Design Review: Homeowners Association Areas
1. Provision of Notice. Within 10 days following the final decision on a Regular Review application by the ARB in
compliance with Subsection 9107.10.030 (Authority), for approval required by this Development Code, the ARB shall
provide notice of its final action to the applicant, the Development Services Department, and to any person who
specifically requested notice of the ARB’s final action.
CITY OF ARCADIA ZONING CODE – ARTICLE IX: DIVISION AND USE OF LAND
CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT CODE
2. Contents of Notice. The notice of the final decision shall contain applicable findings, conditions of approval,
reporting/monitoring requirements deemed necessary to mitigate any impacts and protect the public convenience,
health, interest, safety, and general welfare of the City, and the procedure for appeal.
3. Delivery of Notice. The notice of the final decision shall be delivered by first class mail.
C. Notice of Decision
4. Provision of Notice. Within 10 days following the final decision on an application for a permit or other approval
required by this Development Code, the City shall provide notice of its final action to the applicant and to any person
who specifically requested notice of the City’s final action.
5. Contents of Notice. The notice of the final decision shall contain applicable findings, conditions of approval,
reporting/monitoring requirements deemed necessary to mitigate any impacts and protect the public convenience,
health, interest, safety, and general welfare of the City, and the procedure for appeal.
6. Delivery of Notice. The notice of the final decision shall be delivered by first class mail.
9108.13.070 Effective Date of Decision
A. ARB Chairperson, ARB, Director’s or Commission’s Decision. The decision of the ARB Chairperson, ARB, Director or
Commission is final and effective after 5:00 p.m. the end of business day on the 10th day following the actual date the final
decision is rendered if no appeal of that decision has been filed in compliance with Section 9108.03 (Appeals).
B. Council’s Decision
1. Adopted by Ordinance. A decision of the Council adopted by ordinance is final and shall become effective on the 31st
day following the date the ordinance is actually adopted by the Council, unless otherwise provided in the adopting
ordinance. For example, an ordinance adopted on October 1st will actually be effective on November 1st.
2. Adopted by Resolution. A decision of the Council adopted by resolution is final and shall be effective on the date the
decision is rendered.
3. Contingent on Future Date or Event. The Council may take a final action and make it contingent on a future date or
event.
Attachment No. 4
Attachment No. 4
List of Refinements to the draft Design
Guidelines
Arcadia Citywide Design Guidelines and Resolution No. 7272 List of
Refinements
August 27, 2019
The revisions below reflect changes to the June 2019 Citywide Design Guidelines and
Resolution No. 7272 (Public Review Draft). Revisions are noted in red, with strikethrough for
deletions and underline for additions.
Global changes
Correct numbering typo – e.g. 1.a. revised to A.1
Correct typographical errors
Correct formatting and spacing of text and images
Updated Table of Contents for consistency – e.g. include page numbers
Updated Acknowledgements page for consistency and accuracy
Industrial Design Guidelines
Page 3 (B. Design Guidelines)
Objective 3: Create a cohesive and landscaped street edge that minimizes the appearance of
expansive parking lots or service areas and provides pedestrian access.
Commercial/Mixed Use Design Guidelines
Removed hyphen between “mixed” and “use” throughout the document for consistency with the
Development Code
Moved the following guidelines from Section III. Guidelines Applicable to Both Commercial and
Mixed Use, 4. Articulation to 9. Lighting as shown below:
b. Light fixtures should be designed or selected to be architecturally compatible with the
main structure or theme of the building.
c. The quality of light, level of light, and type of bulb or source should be carefully selected
so that lighting levels do not draw attention to the glow or glare of the project site, and
timers and sensors should be incorporated to avoid unnecessary lighting.
d. Spotlighting or glare from any site lighting should be shielded from adjacent properties
and directed at a specific object or target area.
Arcadia Updated Design Guidelines
List of Refinements
Page 2 of 6
Moved the following guidelines from Section III. Guidelines Applicable to Both Commercial and
Mixed Use, 4. Public and Private Open Space to 10. Public Art as shown below:
c. Public art is encouraged in public spaces, and can help create a sense of place. Art
should be authentic, participatory or interactive, and meaningful to the community.
d. The selection and placement of public art should be part of the overall site design
process, rather than as an afterthought to a project.
e. Public art should be located in conjunction with other site features, such as a plaza or
architectural feature and an integral part of site development, rather than a stand-alone,
separate object.
f. Public art should be placed so as to avoid locations where it may obstruct a pedestrian
pathway, create a traffic hazard, or compete with another piece of art within the area.
Multifamily Residential Design Guidelines
Page 2 Introduction
The design guidelines contained within this document have been written to reinforce these goals
and objectives and provides general guidelines for the any addition, remodel, or construction
within any multi- family land use district.
Page 13 Section 9. Windows and Doors
j. Discouraged window materials include: Anodized aluminum window material is discouraged
•
Single-Family Residential Design Guidelines
Page 20 Section 12. Colors and Materials
a. Colors and materials should be applied in an authentic manner on all sides of the home in a
complementary manner in order to reinforce the chosen architectural style.
b. Piecemeal embellishment and frequent changes in colors and materials should be avoided.
Arcadia Updated Design Guidelines
List of Refinements
Page 3 of 6
Appendix A - Architectural Style Guide
Contemporary or Modern Tier 3
Color
Neutral colors, earth tones
Dark accents and exposed wood.
Tudor or Cape Cod
Details Minimal overhangs
Exposed wood corbel,
Wood beam trim
Siding
Color
White and cream stucco
Brick or stone accent
Neutral and
earth tones
Appendix B Glossary of Terms
Guidelines: RegulationsA set of recommendations that can are be required flexibly applied as
appropriate to each project or development situation to meet certain objectives and achieve
attractive and functional designs.
Resolution No. 7272
Page 1
RESOLUTION NO. XXXX7272
Page 1
SECTION 1. The City Council hereby repeals Resolution No. 6770 and Ordinance No. 2285,
and adopts this Resolution pursuant to Ordinance No. XXXX6770 in its entirety.
Arcadia Updated Design Guidelines
List of Refinements
Page 4 of 6
Page 11 and 12
SECTION 6. LIMITS OF THE ARB’S POWER
A. The ARB shall not have authority overreview projects that consist of work
only taking place inside a building that does not substantially change the external
appearance of the building.
B. Review and action taken by theThe ARB shall not review projects that only
be required for involve structures, roofs, wall, or fences greaterthat are less than 2or
equal to two feet above the lowest adjacent grade.
B. Review by This limitation does not limit the ARB’s review of projects that
involve landscaping or hardscaping located within the front or street side yard areas.
C. The ARB shall not be required for anyreview projects that only involve a
fence or wall (or multiple fences and walls) located between adjacent properties and
isthat are not visible from the public right-of-way. A fence or wall will not be considered
visible from the public right-of-way if it is only within a rear yard area, is no higher than
any fence fronting toward the public right -of-way, and no broad side of the fence or wall
faces the public right-of-way.
D. The ARB shall have the power to establish requirements concerning the
submittal of applications for the purpose of exercising its duties, subject to review and
approval by the City. Copies of such requirements shall be kept on file with the
Development Services Department, Planning Services. Thi s does not apply to
development standards.
Arcadia Updated Design Guidelines
List of Refinements
Page 5 of 6
E. The ARBARB’s review shall not havebe consistent with the authority to
further modify their own City’s ARB regulations as notedcontained in Division 2, Section
9102.01 (Residential Zones) of the Development Code Section 2 or and in the course of
performing its review, the ARB shall not modify or to waive any regulations inprovisions
of the Arcadia Development Code, pertaining to the basic or other established City
regulations.
D.F. The ARB’s review shall be consistent with and subject to the City’s
established zoning regulations ofapplicable to the property.
E.G. The ARB shall not have the power to modify any regulations in the
Development Code. The ARB may, however, make a recommendation regardin g such
regulations to the City staff, Planning Commission, or City Council, that will be taken
into consideration during the decision-making process.
F.H. The ARB shall not havereview each project consistent with the
authority to provisions set forth in this Resolution and shall not create theiror apply its
own standards or policies relating to design and development within their HOA areas
without a formal submittal, review, and approval byin the respective HOA area. This
Section does not prevent the ARB from rendering advisory opinions to the City Council
regarding design or development standards or formally applying to the City for adoption
or modification of design or development standards.
Arcadia Updated Design Guidelines
List of Refinements
Page 6 of 6
Page 13
SECTION 9. This Resolution shall take effect upon the effective date of
Ordinance No. 2363.
Attachment No. 5
Attachment No. 5
Changes to Resolution No. 6770
1
RESOLUTION NO. 6770
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA,
CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING AND AMENDING REGULATIONS
APPLICABLE TO REAL PROPERTY IN THE SINGLE-FAMILY
HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN ZONE
AREAS. (Updated but it is essentially the same.)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, DOES
HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Council hereby repeals Resolution Nos. 5286, 5287,
5288, 5289, and 5290 and Ordinance No. 1832, and adopts this Resolution pursuant to
Ordinance No. 2285. (This section has updated with current information but it is
essentially the same.)
SECTION 2. In accordance with the Arcadia General Plan directive to protect
and preserve the character and quality of its neighborhoods by requiring harmonious
design, and to implement Arcadia's Single-Family Residential Design Guidelines
applicable to the real property within the five Single-Family Homeowners' Associations
that are zoned "D" as Architectural Design area, Architectural Review Boards are
established for each Association and are hereinafter referred to as the "ARBs". The five
Homeowners' Associations and their Architectural Design Zones are:
Arcadia Highlands Home Owners Association - "Highlands"
Rancho Santa Anita Property Owners Association - "Upper Rancho" Santa Anita
Oaks Homeowners Association - "Oaks"
Rancho Santa Anita Residents' Association - "Lower Rancho" Santa Anita Village
Community Association of Arcadia - "Village"
The boundaries for each Association are depicted in Exhibit "A." The ARB for
2
each area is governed by the corresponding Homeowners' Association Board for that
area. (This section has been updated with current information and directly
references the Design Guidelines but it is essentially the same.)
SECTION 3. In order to promote and maintain the quality single-family residential
environment of the City of Arcadia, and to protect the property value s and architectural
character of such residential environments in those portions of the City in which the
residents have formed a homeowners association, and to accomplish the purposes set
forth in Section 7 there are hereby established the following regulations and procedures
in which said associations may exercise plan review authority. (This section has been
modified and moved to Section 4 (Authority and Responsibility of The ARBs.)
SECTION 4. It is determined that each building or structure and its la ndscaping
and hardscape on properties within each area should exhibit a consistent and cohesive
architectural style, and be harmonious and compatible with other neighborhood
structures in architectural style, scale, visual massing, height, width and length, and
setbacks in relationship to site contours and architectural elements such as texture, color
and building materials. To promote harmony and compatibility is not to promote
sameness, uniformity, a specific architectural style, or a certain time period. It is
acknowledged that architecture (and neighborhoods in general) evolve and change over
time and this will be considered through the review process. (The above paragraph has
been moved to Section 4, under Architectural Design Review Process.)
The following standards and conditions are hereby imposed upon all properties
within said areas pursuant to the zoning regulations of the Arcadia Municipal Code, and
all those in ownership or control of property within said areas are subject to this
3
Resolution.
A. SITE PLANNING -1. Natural amenities such as views, and other features
unique to the site should be preserved and incorporated into development proposals.
(Still in Section 4. Language added to strengthen relationship between the
Resolution and the Design Guidelines.)
2. The location, configuration, and design of new buildings and structures, or
the alteration or enlargement of existing structures, should be visually harmonious with
their sites and compatible with the character and quality of the surroundings. (Still in
Section 4. Language added to strengthen relationship between the Resolution and
the Design Guidelines.)
3. The height and bulk of proposed dwellings and structures on the site should
be in scale and in proportion with the height and bulk of dwellings and structures on
surrounding sites. Alternatively, projects should incorporate design measures to
adequately mitigate scale differences. (Still in Section 4. Language added to
strengthen relationship between the Resolution and the Design Guidelines.)
4. The design of a new house should provide effective and varied open space
around the residence. (Still in Section 4. Language added to strengthen relationship
between the Resolution and Design Guidelines.)
B. STREETSCAPE- The developed subject property, when viewed from the
street, should blend and be harmonious with the other structures and landscaping on
the street. This includes and is not limited to setbacks, structural mass and scale,
height, roof forms, façades, entries, building materials and everything that can be seen
from the street. Each neighborhood or street has an established streetscape that
4
defines its character. Streetscape characteristics should be considered by new projects.
(Still in Section 4. Language has been slightly modified)
C. FLOOR AREA - The space contained within the boundaries of the property,
including any open porch, open entry, balcony, covered patio, trellis, or garage, whether
or not it is an integral part of the dwelling, shall NOT be considered in computing the
square footage contained in any such building as measured from the outer faces of the
exterior walls in computing the required minimum floor area of a dwelling.
Village - 1,200 square feet of ground floor area if 1 story in height, or 1,300
square feet of floor area if 2 stories in height, at least 900 square feet of which must be
on the ground floor.
Lower Rancho - 1,400 square feet of ground floor area if 1 story and not
less than 1,000 square feet on ground floor if 1Y2 or 2 stories
Upper Rancho - 2,500 square feet of ground floor area. Attached covered
porch, balcony or garage shall be counted at .5.
Highlands - 1,600 square feet if 1 story and not less than 1,200 square feet
on ground floor if 1 ½ or 2 stories.
Oaks- 2,000 square feet of ground floor area, except 1,800 square feet in
Tracts 14656, 13544 & 10617, in which no one-family dwelling shall be erected or
permitted which contains less than 1,800 square feet of ground floor area.
(The above information has been eliminated. The City Council approved
Floor Area Ratios can be found in Division 2 of the Development Code.)
D. FRONT YARD SETBACKS - If a dwelling with a larger front yard than
the minimum required by the underlying zone designation exists on a lot on either
5
side of the subject property, the ARB shall have the authority to require a front yard
setback for the subject property equal to at least an average of the two adjacent front
yards.
Village - Underlying Zoning
Lower Rancho- Underlying Zoning
Upper Rancho- Minimum 50 feet
Highlands- Underlying Zoning
Oaks - Minimum sixty-five (65) feet from the front property line, except that
Tract 13544 shall be not less than sixty (60) feet, Tracts 13345 & 11013 shall not be
less than fifty-five (55) feet, and Tract 14656 shall not be less than fifty (50) feet.
(The above information has been removed from the resolution and is now
in Division 2 of the Development Code. Minor revisions to wording have been
made for consistency with the Development Code.)
E. SIDE YARD SETBACKS
Village - 10% of lot frontage, and not less than 5 feet
Lower Rancho - 10% of the lot frontage, and not less than 10 feet
Upper Rancho- Minimum 15 feet
Highlands- 10% of lot frontage, and not less than 6 feet
Oaks - 10% of lot frontage, and not less than 10 feet
(The above information has been removed from the resolution and is now
in Division 2 of the Development Code. Minor revisions to wording have been
made for consistency with the Development Code.)
F. REAR YARD SETBACKS Village - Minimum 25 feet
6
Lower Rancho – Underlying Zoning
Upper Rancho - Minimum 40 feet
Highlands - Underlying Zoning
Oaks - Minimum 35 feet
(The above information has been removed from the resolution and is now
in Division 2 of the Development Code. Minor revisions to wording have been
made for consistency with the Development Code.)
G. CORNER LOT SETBACKS (STREET SIDE)
Village - Underlying Zoning
Lower Rancho - Underlying Zoning
Upper Rancho - Underlying Zoning
Highlands - Minimum 15 feet from side street for Tracts 10725, 13367,
14626, 15285 & 16920.
Oaks - On a corner lot, any detached garage shall be located a minimum of
twenty (20) feet, at any point, from the side street property line.
(The above information has been removed from the resolution and is now
in Division 2 of the Development Code. Minor revisions to wording have been
made for consistency with the Development Code)
H. FRONT OF DWELLING- For all HOAs, any dwelling on the lot should
face the front lot line. Exceptions for good cause may be granted through the review
process.
(The above information has been eliminated. This can be enforced using
Design Guidelines. The Site Planning Principles and Neighborhood Context,
7
Forms and Mass, and Frontage Conditions sections touch upon this.)
I. GARAGES- No carports allowed.
Village & Lower Rancho - Garages shall not dominate the front elevation, and
should be set back from the front facade or located in the back yard.
Upper Rancho - No garage door shall be allowed to face the public right-of-way
within the front 150 feet of the property. No garage door shall be closer to the street
than the dwelling (Lots 1 through 20 of Tract No. 13184 shall be excepted). Corner lots
shall be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
Highlands- Underlying Zoning
Oaks - A detached garage shall not be located less than 150 feet from the front
property line, except for Tract 11013 which shall be 140 feet and Tracts 13345, 14656 &
13544 which shall be 125 feet, and in no case shall the garage be closer to the front
property line than the main dwelling. Front facing garages are strongly discouraged.
(The above information has been removed from the resolution and is now in
Division 2 of the Development Code.)
J. EXTERIOR BUILDING MATERIALS- Materials used on the exterior of any
structure, including without limitation, roofing, and walls or fences greater than 2 feet
above the lowest adjacent grade, shall be compatible with the materials of other
structures on the same lot and with the other structures in the neighborhood. (This
information has been m odified and is combined with “Architectural Style and
Exterior Building Appearance” in Section 4. This information can be further
enforced using the Design Guidelines. Façade Details, Colors and Materials,
and Fences, Walls, Gates, and Hedges sections all address this.)
8
K. EXTERIOR BUILDING APPEARANCE - The appearance of any
structure, including roofs, walls or fences shall be compatible with existing structures,
roofing, walls or fences in the neighborhood, inclusive of landscape and hardscape.
(This information has been m odified and is combined with “Architectural Style
and Exterior Building Appearance” in Section 4. This information can be
further enforced using the Design Guidelines. Façade Details, Colors and
Materials, and Fences, Walls, Gates, and Hedges sections touch upon this.)
L. AFFECT ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND NEIGHBORHOOD
The impacts on adjacent properties shall be addressed, including impacts on privacy
and views. First story and second story elements should be designed and articulated to
reasonably address these issues, and windows and balconies shall be located to
reasonably protect privacy and views of surrounding homes and yards. (This section
has been retitled to “Privacy”. Additional information from the Design Guidelines
has been incorporated)
M. TREES - City Planning staff must approve the removal of any Oak Tree
or construction of any improvements under the drip line of Oak Trees. (This section
has been retitled to “Landscaping and Trees”. Additional information has been
added to clarify the ARBs role regarding landscaping and trees during the design
review process.)
N. ANIMALS - Wild animals, sheep, hogs, goats, bees, cows, horses, mules,
poultry, or rabbits shall not be permitted or kept. (This information is the same and still
in Section 4.)
SECTION 5. No structure, roof, wall or fence greater than 2 feet above the
9
lowest adjacent grade, shall be erected, placed or replaced unless approved by the
ARB. (The above information has been modified and moved to Section 4 and
Division 7 of the Development Code.)
Plans for the erection, placement, or replacement of any structure, roof, wall or
fence, showing the precise location on the lot of the structure, wall or fence, shall be
submitted to the ARB. (The above information has been modified and moved to
Section 4 and Division 7 of the Development Code.)
No structure, roof, wall or fence shall be erected, placed or replaced except in
exact conformance with the plans approved by the ARB; however, any fence or wall
between adjacent properties not within the front building setback or street side setback
area is subject only to review by the City. (The above information has been modified
and moved to Section 6 and Division 7 of the Development Code.)
Specific requirements of the ARB for proper consideration of an application are
listed on the Short Review or Regular Review Applications. (The above information
has been removed from the Resolution and is now in Division 7 in the
Development Code.)
The provisions of this requirement shall not apply if the project consists only
of work inside a building that does not substantially change the external appearance of
the building. (The above information has been modified and moved to Section 6 of
the Development Code.)
A. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD - The ARB shall be empowered
to transact business and exercise powers herein conferred, only if the following
requirements exist: (This section has been moved to Section 3 and retitled
10
“Requirements of the ARBs”)
1. A formally organized property owner's organization exists in the
applicable area described in Section 1. (Information has been updated but it is
essentially the same )
2. The organization has by-laws adopted that authorize the establishment of
the ARB. (Information has been added but it is essentially the same.)
3. Said by-laws provide that only property owners can be appointed to and
serve on the ARB. (This information has been eliminated because some HOA by-
laws allow for professionals not residing in the HOA to participate on the ARB.)
4. Owners have been appointed to the ARB in accordance with the by-laws.
(This information has been updated to allow for professionals not residing in the
HOA to participate on the ARB per some HOA by-laws.)
5. A copy of the by-laws and any amendments thereto has been filed with the
City Clerk. (Information is the same.)
6. The ARB shall designate a custodian of records who shall maintain said
records and make them available for public review upon reasonable request.
(Information is the same.)
7. Permanent written records of the meetings, findings, actions, and decisions
of the ARB shall be maintained by the ARB, in accordance with the City's records
retention policies. (Information has been updated but it is essentially the same.)
8. The ARB's decision on a Regular Review Process shall be accompanied by
specific findings, based upon a reference to supporting facts, setting forth the actions
and decisions. (This information has been moved to Section 5 and Division 7 of the
11
Development Code.)
9. Only ARB members present at the meeting can participate in making the
decision. (Information is the same.)
10. Any decision by the ARB shall be made by a majority of the entire
membership of the ARB, and the ARB members who considered the application shall
render the decision. (Information is the same.)
11. A copy of the ARB's findings and decision shall be mailed to the applicant
within 7 working days of the ARB's decision. (This information has been modified and
moved to Section 5 and Division 8 of the Development Code.)
12. All meetings of the ARB shall be open to the public in accordance with the
Ralph M. Brown Act (California Open Meeting Law). All aspects of the Brown Act shall
be adhered to by members of the ARB. This includes, but is not limited to proper
posting of meeting agendas, noticing requirements, no discussion of matters outside of
public meetings, etc. (Information is the same.)
B. POWERS OF THE ARB - Pursuant to Section 3 and Sections 4A through
4N, and through the specified review process, the ARB shall have the power to: (This
section has been modified and moved to Section 4.)
1. Determine the compatibility with the neighborhood of the mass, scale, design
and appearance of the proposed project.
2. Determine and approve appropriate setbacks. (This information has been
modified and moved to Section 4.)
3. Determine whether materials and appearance are compatible with the
neighborhood. (This information has been modified and moved to Section 4.)
12
4. Determine the impact of the proposed project on adjacent properties. (This
information has been modified and moved to Section 4.)
5. Subject to compliance or consistency with the City's Municipal Code, any of
the conditions set forth in Sections 4A through 4N may be made less restrictive by the
ARB if the ARB determines that such action will foster the appropriate development of a
lot and will not adversely affect the use and enjoyment of the adjacent lots and the
neighborhood and would not be inconsistent with the provisions and intent of this
Resolution. (This information has been removed from the resolution.
Administrative Modifications will be needed to modify HOA regulations specified
in Division 2)
6. The ARB shall have the power to establish requirements concerning project
applications and procedures for review for the purpose of exercising its duties, subject
to review and approval of the City. Copies of such requirements shall be kept on file
with the Planning Department. (This information has been moved to Section 5)
C. NOTIFICATION STANDARDS FOR REVIEW PROCESS- For the purpose
of conducting design review, required notification shall be deemed to include at least the
two parcels on each side of the parcel subject to plan approval (subject parcel), the five
parcels facing the subject parcel, and the three parcels to the rear of the subject parcel.
Unusually situated parcels, those where a second-story addition or modification is
involved, or where the slope of the terrain might impact additional neighbors, may
require additional parcels to be part of the required parcels to be notified, and this is to
be determined by the ARB Chair or designee. The required notification shall not include
properties outside of the HOA area or commercially-zoned properties. An example of
13
the required area of notification is set forth below, although the required notification may
vary case-by-case:
+IIIII - Street---+ o
Subject Parcel
Street
Required Notification Area
Parcels included in "Required Notification Area" as related to Subject Parcel
(The above information has been removed from the resolution and is now in
Division 8 of the Development Code.)
D. SHORT REVIEW PROCESS PROCEDURE
1. The Short Review Process may be used by the ARB for any single-story
remodel or addition where (a) the design is compatible with the design of existing
structures on the subject property and neighborhood; and (b) the design is in harmony
with the streetscape of the neighborhood. The ARB Chair or designee shall have the
authority to approve the following specific Short Review Process items:
Single-story remodels and additions
Detached accessory structures- new, additions to, and/or remodels
14
Fences and/or walls in and/or facing (i.e., visible from) front and street side
yards
Hardscape, landscaping and structural elements in front and street side
yards, including without limitation, swimming pools, spas, fountains and
other water features
Fences, lights, and other features related to tennis courts, sports courts
or other significant paved features
Mechanical equipment
Roofing
2. The ARB is not required to hold a noticed, scheduled meeting for the
consideration of a Short Review Process application.
3. If the ARB Chair or designee determines that the proposed project is not a
cohesive design, not in harmony with the neighborhood, or might have an adverse
impact on the neighborhood, he/she may require that the application be processed
under the Regular Review Process procedure.
4. The ARB Chair or designee shall render a decision on a Short Review
Process Item within 10 working days from the date a complete application is filed with
the ARB Chair or designee; failure to take action in said time shall be deemed an
approval of the plans, at the end of the 10 working-day period.
(The above information has been modified and moved to Section 5 and is now in
Division 7 and Division 8 of the Development Code.)
E. REGULAR REVIEW PROCESS PROCEDURE
The Regular Review Process shall be used by the ARB for review of (1) any new
15
home construction, (2) any new or expansion of a second story, (3) any significant
change in architectural style of an existing building, and (4) all projects that are not
eligible to be processed by the above Short Form Review procedure as determined by
the ARB Chair or designee.
1. The ARB is required to hold a noticed, scheduled meeting for the
consideration of a Regular Review Process application.
2. The applicant shall provide to the ARB all documents required by the
application.
3. Notice of the ARB's meeting shall be deposited in the mail by the ARB Chair
or designee, postage prepaid by the applicant, to the applicant and to all property
owners within the required. notification area of the subject property, not less than 10
calendar days before the date of such meeting.
4. Any decision by the ARB shall be made by a majority of the entire
membership of the ARB, and the ARB members who considered the application shall
render such decision.
5. The ARB shall render its decision on a Regular Review Process application
within 30 working days from the date a complete application is filed with the ARB; failure
to take action in said time shall be deemed an approval of the plans, at the end of the
30 working-day period. (The above information has been modified and moved to
Section 5 and is now in Division 7 and Division 8 of the Development Code.)
F. EXPIRATION OF ARB'S APPROVAL - If for a period of 1 year from the date
of approval, any project for which plans have been approved by the ARB, has not begun
construction (as evidenced by clearing and grading and/or the installation of a new
16
foundation and/or by installation of new materials on a structure that is being
remodeled) or has been unused, abandoned or discontinued, said approval shall
become null and void and of no effect. Such project may be resubmitted to the ARB for
renewed approval; however, the ARB shall review the project as if it had not been
previously approved in accordance with the current standards in effect. (This
information has been removed from the resolution and is now in Division 8 of the
Development Code.)
G. LIMIT ON ARB'S POWER- The ARB shall not have the power to modify any
regulations in the Municipal Code. The ARB may, however, make a recommendation
regarding modifying such regulations to the City staff, department, commission or board
that will be considering any such modification request. (This information has been
moved to Section 6.)
SECTION 6. Appeals from the ARB shall be made to the Planning
Commission. Said appeal shall be made in writing and delivered to Planning Services
within 7 calendar days of the ARB's decision and shall be accompanied by an appeal
fee in accordance with the applicable fee schedule adopted by resolution of the City
Council. Planning Commission decisions on ARB cases may be appealed to the City
Council. (This information has been modified and moved to Section 5 and is now in
Division 8 of the Development Code.)
Upon receipt in proper form of a completed appeal from the ARB's decision, such
appeal shall be processed by Planning Services in accordance with the same
procedures applicable to appeals from the Modification Committee, except noticing shall
be consistent with ARB noticing. (This information has been modified and moved to
17
Section 5 and is now in Division 8 of the Development Code.)
A. STANDARDS FOR ARB DECISIONS AND APPEALS - The ARB and any
body hearing an appeal from the ARB's decision shall be guided by the following
principles:
1. Control of architectural appearance and use of materials shall not be so
exercised that individual initiative is stifled in creating the appearance of external
features of any particular structure, building, fence, wall or roof, except to the extent
necessary to establish contemporary accepted standards of harmony and compatibility
acceptable to the ARB or the body hearing an appeal in order to avoid that which is
excessive, garish, and substantially unrelated to the neighborhood.
2. Good architectural character is based upon the principles of harmony and
proportion in the elements of the structure as well as the relationship of such principles
to adjacent structures and other structures in the neighborhood.
3. A poorly designed external appearance of a structure, wall, fence, or roof,
can be detrimental to the use and enjoyment and value of adjacent property and
neighborhood.
4. A good relationship between adjacent front yards increases the value of
properties and makes the use of both properties more enjoyable. (The above
information has been removed from the resolution. Modified language can be
found in Division 7 of the Development Code.)
SECTION 7. The City Council finds and determines that the public health,
safety and general welfare of the community require the adoption of this Resolution. It
is determined that the various land use controls, and property regulations as set forth
18
herein are substantially related to maintenance of Arcadia's environment, for the
purpose of assuring that the appearance of structures will be compatible and
harmonious with the use and enjoyment of surrounding properties. Design controls and
aesthetic considerations will help maintain the beauty of the community, protect
property values, and help assure protection from deterioration, blight, and
unattractiveness, all of which can have a negative impact on the environment of the
community, affecting property values, and the quality of life which is characteristic of
Arcadia.
It is further determined that the purpose and function of this Resolution is
consistent with the history of the City and continued efforts through various means to
maintain the City's land use, environmental, and economic goals and to assure
perpetuation of both the psychological benefits and economic interests concomitant to
an attractive, well maintained community with emphasis on residential living.
All findings and statements of purpose in related resolutions which pre-existed
this Resolution or prior covenants, conditions, and restrictions constitute part of the
rationale for this Resolution and are incorporated by reference. (The title “Public
Health, Safety, and Welfare Finding” has been added to the above section. The
information is the same)
SECTION 8. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase,
or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held to be invalid by the final decision of
any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions of this Resolution. The Council hereby declares that it would have
adopted this Resolution and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause,
19
phrase, or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more section,
subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof be declared
invalid. (This section has updated with current information but it is essentially the
same.)
SECTION 9. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this
Resolution. Passed, approved and adopted this 3rd day of January, 2012. (This
section has updated with current information but it is essentially the same.)
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Stephen P. Deitsch
City Attorney
20
Exhibit "A"
Map and Descriptions
(Updated with new map. Boundary descriptions remain the same)
Homeowners' Association Areas
1) Arcadia Highlands Homeowners' Association- "Highlands"
2) Rancho Santa Anita Property Owners' Association - "Upper Rancho"
3) Santa Anita Oaks Homeowners' Association- "Oaks"
4) Rancho Santa Anita Residents' Association- "Lower Rancho"
5) Santa Anita Village Community Association- "Village"
21
Highlands
The area north of the commercial properties fronting on Foothill Boulevard, south of
the northerly City limit, east of Santa Anita Avenue, west of the Los Angeles County
Flood Control District property, extending to the east end of Sycamore Avenue.
Excluding those properties located in Tract 15073 (1500 to 1538 & 1503 to 1537
Highland Oaks Drive) and 1501 Highland Oaks Drive and 307A, 307B, 307C & 307D
East Foothill Boulevard.
Upper Rancho
The property bounded on the south by the centerline of Foothill Boulevard; on the
west by the east line of Michillinda Avenue; on the east by the centerline of Baldwin
Avenue; and on the north by the City limits.
Oaks
Beginning at a point at the intersection of the centerline of Baldwin Avenue and the
centerline of Orange Grove Avenue; thence easterly along the centerline of Orange
Grove Avenue to its intersection with the centerline of Oak Meadow Road; thence
southerly along the centerline of Oak Meadow Road to its intersection with the
centerline of Hacienda Drive; thence westerly along the centerline of Hacienda Drive to its
intersection with the centerline of San Carlos Road; thence southerly along the
centerline of San Carlos Road to its intersection with the centerline of Foothill
Boulevard; thence westerly along the centerline of Foothill Boulevard to its intersection
with the centerline of Baldwin Avenue; thence northerly along the centerline of Baldwin
Avenue to the point of beginning.
Beginning at a point at the intersection of the centerline of Oak Meadow Road and
the centerline of Orange Grove Avenue; thence easterly along the centerline of Orange
Grove Avenue to its intersection with the centerline of Santa Anita Avenue; thence
southerly along the centerline of Santa Anita Avenue to its intersection with the easterly
prolongation of the southerly property line of Lot No. 76 of Tract No. 11074; thence
westerly along said easterly prolongation and said southerly property line to its
intersection with the westerly property line of Lot No. 76 of Tract No. 11074; thence
southerly along the prolongation of said westerly property line to its intersection with the
centerline of Foothill Boulevard; thence westerly along the centerline of Foothill
Boulevard to its intersection with the centerline of San Carlos Road; thence northerly
along the centerline of San Carlos Road to its intersection with the centerline of
Hacienda Drive; thence easterly along the centerline of Hacienda Drive to its
intersection with the centerline of Oak Meadow Road; thence northerly along the
centerline of Oak Meadow Road to the point of beginning.
22
Beginning at a point at the intersection of the centerline of Santa Anita Avenue and
the easterly prolongation of the southerly property line of Lot No. 76 of Tract No. 11074;
thence westerly along said easterly prolongation and said southerly property line to its
intersection with the westerly property line of Lot No. 76 of Tract No. 11074; thence
southerly along the prolongation of said westerly property line a distance of 65 feet;
thence easterly along a line parallel to the southerly property line of Lot 76 of Tract No.
11074 to its intersection with the centerline of Santa Anita Avenue; thence northerly
along the centerline of Santa Anita Avenue a distance of 65 feet to the point of
beginning.
Lower Rancho
Area #1 Beginning at a point on easterly line of Michillinda Avenue, said point
being the southwesterly corner of Lot 36, Tract No. 15928; thence easterly along the
southerly boundary of said Tract No. 15928 and Tract No. 14428 to a point which is the
northwesterly corner of Lot 12, Tract No. 15960; thence southerly along the westerly
line of said Lot 12 and its prolongation thereof to its intersection with the centerline of
De Anza Place; thence southerly and easterly along said centerline to its intersection
with the centerline of Altura Road; thence southerly along said centerline to its
intersection with the centerline of Hugo Reid Drive; thence easterly along said centerline to
its intersection with the centerline of Golden West Avenue; thence northwesterly
along said centerline to its intersection with the centerline of Tallac Drive; thence
easterly along said centerline to its intersection with the easterly line of Tract No. 13312;
thence northerly and easterly along the easterly and southerly boundary of said tract to
the southeasterly corner of Lot No. 1 to its intersection with the easterly line of Golden
West Avenue; thence northerly along said easterly line to its intersection with the
southerly line of Vaquero Road; thence easterly along said southerly line to its
intersection with the easterly terminus line of said Vaquero Road; thence northerly along
said easterly line to its intersection with the southerly line of Lot 17 of Tract No. 11215;
thence easterly along said southerly line to its intersection with the easterly line of
aforementioned Tract No. 11215; thence northerly along said easterly line and its
prolongation thereof to its intersection with the centerline of Colorado Street; thence
westerly along said centerline to its intersection with the centerline of Altura Road;
thence southerly along said centerline to its intersection with the easterly prolongation of
the northerly line of Tract No. 17430; thence westerly along said northerly line to its
intersection with the easterly line of Michillinda Avenue; thence southerly along said
easterly line to the point of beginning, said point being the southwesterly corner of Lot
36 of Tract No. 15928.
Area #2 Beginning at the northwesterly corner of Lot No. 62 of Tract No. 12786;
thence southerly along the westerly line of said Lot and its prolongation thereof to its
intersection with the centerline of Hugo Reid Drive; thence easterly along said center
line to its intersection with the southerly prolongation of the easterly line of Tract No.
14460; thence northerly along said easterly line to its intersection with the northerly line of
said tract; thence westerly along said northerly line to its intersection with the westerly line
of said Tract No. 14460; thence southwesterly along said westerly line, and its
southwesterly prolongation thereof, to its intersection with the northeasterly corner of
23
Lot No. 61 of Tract No. 12786; thence westerly along the northerly line of said tract to
the point of beginning, said point being the northwesterly corner of Lot 62 of Tract No.
12786.
Area #3 All properties with that area bounded on the west by Baldwin Avenue, on
the north and east by Colorado Street and on the south by the southerly tract
boundaries of Tract Nos. 14940 and 15318.
Santa Anita Village
Beginning at a point on easterly line of Michillinda Avenue, said point being the
southwesterly corner of Lot 36, Tract No. 15928; thence easterly along the southerly
boundary of said Tract No. 15928 and Tract No. 14428 to a point which is the
northwesterly corner of Lot 12, Tract No. 15960; thence southerly along the westerly
line of said Lot 12 and its prolongation thereof to its intersection with the centerline of
De Anza Place; thence southerly and easterly along said centerline to its intersection
with the centerline of Altura Road; thence southerly along said centerline to its
intersection with the centerline of Hugo Reid Drive; thence easterly along said
centerline to its intersection with the centerline of Golden West Avenue; thence
northwesterly along said centerline to its intersection with the centerline of Tallac Drive;
thence easterly along said centerline to its intersection with the easterly line of Tract No.
13312; thence southerly along the easterly and northerly lines of Lots 11 through 19 of
said tract to be northeast corner of said Lot 19; thence easterly along the easterly
prolongation of said Lot 19 to its intersection with the northwesterly corner of lot 74,
Tract No. 12786; thence easterly along the northerly line of said tract to the
northwesterly corner of Lot 62 of said Tract No. 12786; thence southerly along the
westerly line of said lot and its prolongation thereof to its intersection with the centerline of
Hugo Reid Drive, thence easterly along said centerline to its intersection with the
northeasterly prolongation of the easterly line of Tract 12786; thence southerly along
said easterly line and also the easterly line of Tract No. 12104 to the southeast corner of
Lot 129 of said Tract 12104; thence westerly along the southerly lines of Tract No.
12104, Tract 11688, and Tract No. 11932 and its westerly prolongation to its
intersection with the centerline of Cortez Road; thence northerly along said centerline to its
intersection with the centerline of distance a 150' more or less to a point; thence
northerly to a point on the northerly line of Portola Drive, said point being 140' westerly
from the northwesterly corner of Portola Drive and Cortez Road, thence northerly to the
southwest corner of Lot 28, Tract 11932; thence northerly along the westerly line of said
tract and its prolongation thereof to its intersection with the centerline of Balboa Drive;
thence westerly along said centerline to its intersection with the centerline of Sunset
Boulevard; thence northwesterly along said centerline to its intersection with the
southerly prolongation of the easterly line of Michillinda Avenue; thence northerly along
said easterly line to the point of beginning, said point being the southwesterly corner of
Lot 36, Tract No. 15928.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS: CITY OF
ARCADIA )
I, JAMES H. BARROWS, City Clerk of the City of Arcadia, hereby certifies that
the foregoing Resolution No. 6770 was passed and adopted by the City Council of the
City of Arcadia, signed by the Mayor and attested to by the City Clerk at a regular
meeting of said Council held on the 3rd day of January, 2012 and that said Resolution
was adopted by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Amundson, Segal and Kovacic NOES: Council
Members Chandler and Harbicht ABSENT: None
ity Clerk of the C1ty of Arcadia
Attachment No. 6
Attachment No. 6
August 27, 2019 Planning Commission
Staff Report, Meeting Minutes, and
Resolution
DATE: August 27, 2019
TO: Honorable Chairman and Planning Commission
FROM: Lisa L. Flores, Planning & Community Development Administrator
Prepared By: Jordan Chamberlin, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 2038 – AMENDING THE CITY’S DESIGN
GUIDELINES AND THE REGULATIONS AND PROCESS OF THE FIVE
CITY-DESIGNATED HOMEOWNERS’ ASSOCIATIONS (HOAS), AND
CODIFYING THE HOAS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN THE CITY’S
DEVELOPMENT CODE WITH A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION UNDER
THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA)
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 2038 and forward a
recommendation to the City Council
SUMMARY
In 2017, the Development Services Department retained the services of RRM Design
Group to complete an update of the Citywide Architectural Design Guidelines. As part of
the Update, Resolution No. 6770, the Resolution related to development in the five City-
designated Homeowners’ Associations (HOAs), was also updated to improve the
coordination of the design review and building permit process between the City and the
HOAs. This resulted in codifying the HOA regulations where they can be easily found in
the Development Code. The primary objective of the Design Guidelines Update was to
ensure consistency with the General Plan and Development Code and to encourage
better design in the community. This effort will create documents that are easy to use
and clearly convey qualitative aspects of design and contextual compatibility that are
not effectively addressed by the development standards found in the Development
Code.
It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2038 (refer to
Attachment No. 1), amending the City’s design guidelines and the regulations and
processes of the five city-designated HOAs, and codifying the HOAs development
standards into the City’s Development Code under Text Amendment No. TA 19-01, with
a Categorical Exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The
Commission should also convey any comments to the City Council.
Resolution No. 2038
Design Guidelines Update
August 27, 2019
Page 2 of 12
BACKGROUND
The City first adopted design guidelines for commercial, industrial, and multi-family
residential projects in 2002. In 2005, the City adopted the first single-family residential
design guidelines for properties not located in HOA areas, and the most recent update
was in 2009. These guidelines have been critical in assisting staff with the design
review process and in promoting neighborhood compatibility. The five City-designated
HOAs have independent Architectural Review Boards (ARBs) that are responsible for
administering design review within the HOA boundaries based on development
standards, processes, and procedures set forth in City Council Resolution No. 6770,
which was last updated in 2012. The HOAs also utilize and rely upon the Single-Family
Residential Design Guidelines during their design review process.
Following the adoption of the Development Code Update in 2016, the City turned its
attention to the Citywide Design Guidelines and Resolution No. 6770. This is the last set
of documents that need to be updated to implement the City’s General Plan, which was
substantially updated in 2010. Because of the fast pace of development in recent years
and the change in the types of development being proposed, the guidelines needed to
be updated to provide clear and useful recommendations for the design, construction,
review, and approval of development in Arcadia.
Staff worked closely with the consultant, RRM Design Group, to modernize the existing
guidelines and address the recurring challenges faced by staff and the ARBs during the
design review process. This also included a review of Resolution No. 6770 to identify
outdated standards, inconsistencies in the processes within the Development Code,
and ways to improve the design review process.
The Design Guidelines Update process has involved several levels of community
outreach and public participation. The public outreach consisted of Stakeholders
Interviews; one (1) Community Meeting; and two (2) meetings with the HOAs. A Design
Guidelines Update webpage (www.ArcadiaCa.gov/designguidelinesupdate) was created
for the public to view all the updated documents, provide input and/or comments, and
obtain updates throughout the process. Additionally, a letter was sent to all the
stakeholders regarding the Community Meeting, a month prior to the meeting, a notice
was published in the Arcadia Weekly newspaper, and social media posts were sent out
weekly in the months leading up to the meeting. Each of the public outreach
components is described below:
1. Stakeholder Interviews were conducted on October 25, 2017 and October 26,
2017, with the consultant team of RRM Design Group. Those interviewed
included architects, designers, developers, City Council members, Planning
Commission members, and Planning staff. A separate meeting for members of
the HOAs was also held. The interviewees were asked a series of questions
regarding overarching concerns as well as specific topics. Participants were also
Resolution No. 2038
Design Guidelines Update
August 27, 2019
Page 3 of 12
given the opportunity to discuss issues of significance to them that were not
otherwise discussed in response to specific questions.
2. Meetings with the HOAs were conducted between September 19, 2018, and
October 23, 2018. Staff met with either the ARB or the ARB Chairperson for the
Arcadia Highlands Homeowners’ Association (Highlands), Santa Anita Oaks
Association (Oaks), Rancho Santa Anita Residents' Association (Lower Rancho),
and Santa Anita Village Community Association of Arcadia (Village) HOAs. The
only HOA that did not participate in this process was the Rancho Santa Anita
Property Owners Association (Upper Rancho). Staff was unable to meet with the
ARB or ARB Chairperson due to scheduling conflicts, in addition to the fact that
there was only one ARB meeting during this time period. Participants were asked
questions about the ARBs review process as outlined in Resolution No. 6770 and
to identify any concerns about the design review process. Participants were also
given the opportunity to discuss issues of significance to them that were not
otherwise discussed in response to specific questions.
On January 17, 2019, Staff held a meeting with the HOAs to provide an overview
of the changes to Resolution No. 6770 and the proposed text amendment. A total
of 13 representatives from the HOAs were in attendance with at least one
representative from each HOA present.
3. Community Meeting was held on July 13, 2019 to review and discuss the major
changes proposed in the Design Guidelines Update, Resolution No. 6770, and
the proposed text amendment. The comments provided by the attendees were
positive. Those who commented found the revisions to be an improvement and a
move in the right direction but did express concern regarding the photos used in
the Single-Family Residential Design Guidelines. They felt that some of the
photos were not good representations of the quality and type of single-family
development that is typical or should be encouraged in Arcadia. In response to
these comments, changes have been made to the majority of the photos used in
the document to depict more appropriate single-family development. The
changes can be seen in Attachment No. 1- Exhibit “A”, under the list of
refinements.
Based on the community outreach and public participation efforts, it was determined
that the current Citywide Design Guidelines do not provide enough predictability for
developers and builders, do not adequately address current development issues or the
types of development being proposed, and do not have the tools to adequately address
residents’ concerns and maintain high design standards. It also became apparent that
updates to Resolution No. 6770 are needed to help streamline the design review
process in the HOA areas and create consistency between the single-family design
process in the HOA and non-HOA areas.
Resolution No. 2038
Design Guidelines Update
August 27, 2019
Page 4 of 12
ANALYSIS
As part of the Design Guidelines Update, the Single-Family Residential, Multi-Family
Residential, Commercial, Industrial, and Signage Design Guidelines were revised to
address the changes in development patterns throughout the City, to ensure the best
designs possible, and to encourage architecture that is timeless and authentic. The
guidelines for industrial developments have been removed from the Commercial
Guidelines and are now in a separate, standalone document. Guidelines for Mixed Use
development were created and added to the Commercial Guidelines to create a brand
new Commercial/Mixed Use Guidelines document. More detailed information on the
changes made to each document is provided below.
All of the Guidelines have been modernized to address current and future development
trends. Objectives have been added to every guideline to further emphasize the City’s
priorities and standards for future development. The goal of the Design Guidelines
Update was to provide clear and useful recommendations for the design, construction,
review, and approval of the development. As a result, new guidelines were added
throughout the documents, as well as new images and graphics, to encourage the
highest level of design quality while at the same time providing the flexibility necessary
to encourage creativity on the part of an applicant in response to the existing site
conditions.
An explanation of how to use design guidelines, how they are applied, and how they are
applicable to the other documents such as the General Plan and Development Code is
included in the beginning of each document. Tables of contents have been added to
each set of guidelines, followed by applicable design guidelines that direct users to
desired design strategies for development or redevelopment of their property. The
format has been updated to eliminate redundancy and for ease of reference. A brief
summary of the modifications made to each of the design guideline documents is
provided below.
Single-Family Residential Design Guidelines
The Single-Family Residential Design Guidelines were a major focus of the update
process since a majority of new development that occurs in Arcadia is new single-family
homes. The City’s primary objective is to ensure that all new development meets, the
following criteria:
• Design within the established neighborhood context and relationship to the
street;
• Reinforce neighborhood compatibility and identity;
Resolution No. 2038
Design Guidelines Update
August 27, 2019
Page 5 of 12
• Create visually pleasing streetscape character;
• Maintain the visual quality of the hillside areas;
• Incorporate high-quality architecture consistent with the neighborhood character;
• Reduce water use in landscape design.
The importance of the existing neighborhood context and neighborhood compatibility
has been emphasized throughout the document. A new icon was created to highlight
key guidelines that are important to ensuring compatibility with the surrounding
neighborhood (refer to page 5 of the Single-Family Design Guidelines). New guidelines
were added to cover topics that are typically considered by staff and the ARBs during
the design review process but were not mentioned in the existing Design Guidelines,
such as placement of windows, balconies, and garage(s) to name a few. New
guidelines were created for hillside properties since the Development Code now has
regulations on these properties. The language used in the guidelines has been
modernized and refined for added clarity. A multitude of new images and graphics have
been added to provide current examples of successful single-family development.
Updates were also made to the Architectural Style Guide to include Mediterranean,
Prairie, and Tudor/Cape Cod architectural styles to reflect the architectural styles
recently being proposed in the City.
Multifamily Residential Design Guidelines
The Multifamily Residential Design Guidelines have been updated to emphasize the
importance of neighborhood compatibility in regards to massing, scale, and architectural
design. Additional guidelines have been added to provide guidance on private and
common open space, amenities, and service and equipment areas. Guidelines for
three-story buildings have been added since the Development Code now allows this
type of development. New photos have been added to provide current examples of
multifamily development.
Commercial/Mixed Use Design Guidelines
For added clarity and more specific guidance, the Industrial and Sign guidelines have
been removed from the Commercial Guidelines and placed into their own documents.
New guidelines to address mixed use developments have been added to the
Commercial Guidelines to create the Commercial/Mixed Use Design Guidelines. The
new Commercial/Mixed Use Design Guidelines are separated into three sections:
Commercial Design Guidelines, Mixed Use Guidelines, and Guidelines Applicable to
Both Commercial and Mixed Use Development. This makes it easy to understand which
guidelines apply to each type of development and reduces redundancy. With more
Resolution No. 2038
Design Guidelines Update
August 27, 2019
Page 6 of 12
commercial and mixed use developments being proposed, the Commercial/Mixed Use
Design Guidelines emphasize appropriate massing of buildings, pedestrian
accessibility, amenities, and enhancing the street presence of projects. The Updated
Commercial/Mixed Use Design Guidelines, when used in conjunction with the City
Center Design Plan, will provide much more specific guidance to applicants and will
help to enhance the City’s downtown core.
Industrial Design Guidelines
The Industrial Design Guidelines are now a standalone document, and the guidelines
have been updated and refined to provide more specific and clear guidance for
industrial developments. New sections and guidelines have also been added for public
and employee break areas. New photos have been added to provide current examples
of industrial development.
Signage Design Guidelines
The Signage Design Guidelines have been updated to address signage in all zones.
The types of signage have been expanded to be consistent with the types of signs
regulated in the Development Code. Images of various types of signs were added to
assist the new business owners and applicants.
Text Amendment, Resolution No. 6770, and Resolution No. 7272
The development standards for the HOA areas are currently located in two separate
documents, Resolution No. 6770 and the City’s Development Code. In order to find all
the development standards for a property within an HOA area, a homeowner and/or
designer currently must review and compare both documents to see which development
standards prevail and which may be in conflict. This has often led to confusion prior to
designing a project and during the design review process.
To help minimize this confusion, the development standards for the HOAs have been
removed from Resolution No. 6770 and codified within Division 2 of the City’s
Development Code (refer to Attachment No. 2 – Exhibit “B”). With this change, all of the
regulations for the HOA areas are located in one place; in an easy to use table
consistent with the table currently used for the non-HOA areas. The table format is
much more user-friendly for the public, the HOAs, and Planning staff, and it will help
reduce errors and confusion during the design review and Building plan check process.
Minor updates were also made to the language used for some of the development
standards to be consistent with the language already used in the Development Code.
For example, Resolution No. 6770 uses lot frontage to determine side yard setbacks
whereas the Development Code uses lot width. The HOA development standard has
been updated to now refer to lot width for consistency.
Resolution No. 2038
Design Guidelines Update
August 27, 2019
Page 7 of 12
Many of the administrative procedures for single-family design review in non-HOA areas
were updated during the Development Code Update to ensure that processes are
consistent with state law and streamlined to improve the review process. To ensure
consistency for the HOA design review process, the administrative procedure and
processes and have been removed from Resolution No. 6770, updated to be consistent
with the process for design review in non-HOA areas, and codified in Divisions 7 and 8
of the Development Code.
A new section, Section 9107.20 (Site Plan and Design Review: Homeowners
Association Areas) has been added to the Development Code and provides the review
process for projects within the HOA areas. It identifies and defines the role of the three
review authorities for the HOA areas (City Review, Short Review, or Regular review),
and specifies the applicable review authority for different types of construction activity in
an easy-to-use table. The types of construction activities in the table have been
expanded and modernized from what was identified in Resolution No. 6770 to address
the various types of construction that is currently occurring in the HOA areas, such as
solar panels, pool fountains, and façade improvements. Changes were also made to the
level of review required for certain construction activities like roofing, pools and spas,
and other mechanical equipment, in order to make obtaining approvals and building
permits easier and faster for applicants.
The administrative procedures for the ARBs have also been incorporated into Division 8
(Development Code Administration) of the Development Code. Division 8 now provides
very clear procedures for the ARBs that are consistent with the procedures for non-HOA
areas. With the incorporation of the HOA areas into Division 8, the process for
appealing decisions, the effective date of approvals, and the expiration date of
approvals is clarified. Processes for applicants to request time extensions and major
and minor changes to approved plans have been added for projects in the HOA areas.
For consistency, the deadline to file appeals has been revised from seven calendar
days to within 10 days of the decision, and the public notification area has been revised
from the 12 closest homes to a 300’ radius to be consistent with City noticing
requirements.
With the development standards, processes, and procedures for the HOA areas
incorporated into the Development Code, Resolution No. 6770 will be rescinded and a
new resolution, Resolution No. 7272, will be adopted (refer to Attachment No. 1- Exhibit
“C”). Resolution No. 7272 will be a guiding document for the ARBs’ that focuses on
describing the purpose of the ARBs. It also grants authority to the ARBs to perform
design review in order to protect the character, quality, property values, and
architectural character of the HOA areas. Language has been added to emphasize the
importance of the City’s Design Guidelines during the ARBs review process so that the
relationship between the HOA’s design review process and the City’s design guidelines
is clear.
Resolution No. 2038
Design Guidelines Update
August 27, 2019
Page 8 of 12
Further, Resolution No. 7272 specifies the requirements, the authority, and limits for the
ARBs. New language has been incorporated throughout the document to help minimize
ambiguity regarding the ARBs role in the design review process. Resolution No. 6770
outlined certain requirements that needed to be met in order for the ARBs to be able to
perform design review such as by-laws, record keeping, and compliance with the Brown
Act. Additional requirements have been added to the Resolution that will require ARB
members to participate in training if the City finds it necessary in order for them to
perform their duties. An example may be Historic Preservation training, since an
ordinance was recently adopted and could impact the design review process. Also
added is language to clarify the procedure if an ARB is unable to comply with the
requirements stated in the Resolution. If this were to occur, design review for that HOA
area would be completed by the City until the ARB was able to perform the required
duties.
A brief overview of the three different review authorities for projects within the HOA
areas is provided and clarification as to who is authorized to make decisions on these
applications is provided in the resolution. For more detailed information regarding the
processes and procedures for design review in the HOA areas, the Resolution now
refers to the Development Code.
Lastly, the Resolution explains the limits of the ARBs power and what they do not have
purview over. For example, interior only changes to structures are not subject to the
ARBs review. The Resolution also clarifies that the ARB cannot modify or waive the
requirements on the Development Code, design guidelines, or create their own
development standards.
FINDINGS
Pursuant to Development Code Section 9108.03.060, the Text Amendments may be
approved if all the following findings can be satisfied.
Text Amendment Findings:
1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan and any
applicable specific plan(s).
Facts in Support of the Finding: The proposed text amendment to the City’s
Design Guidelines will be consistent with the goals, policies and actions of the
General Plan as they will continue to promote high quality design in buildings,
landscape, signage, public realm, and open space areas. The amended
guidelines have been written to reinforce these goals and objectives and provide
general guidelines for additions, remodels, or construction in any land use area.
In terms of the proposed text amendment to the Development Code, it will codify
the development standards for the HOA areas that were previously found in
Resolution No. 6770. The General Plan recognizes the important role the HOAs
have played in “preserving the character of the residential neighborhoods in the
Resolution No. 2038
Design Guidelines Update
August 27, 2019
Page 9 of 12
northern portion of the City.” Incorporating the HOAs’ development standards into
the City’s Development Code will minimize confusion since all the regulations will
now be located in the one document, will provide clearer guidance, and will
remove any inconsistencies between the HOAs Resolution and City’s single-
family design review process. Therefore, these proposed amendments will
provide additional guidance to aid applicants, ensure the high quality
development desired by the City and the community, and reinforce the General
Plan goals and policies, The proposed amendments will be consistent with
General Plan Land Use Goal No. 3 which encourages the “preservation and
enhancement of Arcadia’s single-family neighborhoods, which are an essential
part of the City’s core identity.”
2. For Development Code amendments only, the proposed amendment is
internally consistent with other applicable provisions of this Development
Code.
Facts in Support of the Finding: This proposed text amendment to the
Development Code includes codifying the existing development standards and
updating the design review processes and procedures for the five City-
designated HOA areas. The text amendment will not be in conflict with the
Development Code and will be consistent with other applicable provisions of the
Development Code. The text amendment will incorporate current development
standards for the HOAs as stated in Resolution No. 6770 and update the design
review processes and procedures in the HOA areas to be consistent with the
City’s design review procedures.
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
The proposed updates are exempt from review under CEQA pursuant to Section
15061(b)(3) which provides that, where it can be seen with certainty that there is no
possibility that a project may have a significant effect on the environment, the project is
not subject to CEQA. The proposed Text Amendment does not create or substantially
alter any existing development standard as it only codifies the existing Homeowners’
Associations development standards and procedures as a minor clean up to the
Development Code. A Preliminary Exemption Assessment is included as Attachment
No. 2.
PUBLIC COMMENTS/NOTICE
A public hearing notice for this item was published in the Arcadia Weekly on August 8,
2019. As of August 20, 2018, staff has not received any public comments on this project
besides what was mentioned at the Community Open House on July 13, 2019 and
through the outreach process in general.
Resolution No. 2038
Design Guidelines Update
August 27, 2019
Page 10 of 12
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2038 to
recommend approval of the Updated Citywide Design Guidelines, Text Amendment No.
TA 19-01 amending the City’s design guidelines and the regulations and processes of
the five city-designated Homeowners’ Associations (HOAs), and codifying the HOAs
development standards in the City’s Development Code under Text Amendment No. TA
19-01, with a Categorical Exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA). The Commission should also convey any comments to the City Council.
If any Planning Commissioner or other interested party has any questions or comments
regarding this matter prior to the August 27, 2019, hearing, please contact Associate
Planner, Jordan Chamberlin, at (626) 821-4334, or by email at
JChamberlin@ArcadiaCA.gov .
Approved:
Lisa L. Flores
Planning & Community Development Administrator
Attachment No. 1: Resolution No. 2038
Exhibit “A” – List of Refinements and Draft Design Guidelines
Exhibit “B” – Proposed text amendments
Exhibit “C” – Draft HOA Resolution - Resolution No. 7272 and
Changes to Resolution No. 6770
Attachment No. 2: Preliminary Exemption Assessment
Attachment No. 7
Attachment No. 7
Preliminary Exemption Assessment
Preliminary Exemption Assessment FORM “A”
PRELIMINARY EXEMPTION ASSESSMENT
1. Name or description of project: RESOLUTION NO. 2038 – Amending the City’s design
guidelines and the regulations and process of the five City-
designated Homeowners’ Associations (hoas), and codifying
the HOAs development standards in the City’s development
code
2. Project Location – Identify street
address and cross streets or
attach a map showing project site
(preferably a USGS 15’ or 7 1/2’
topographical map identified by
quadrangle name):
Citywide
3. Entity or person undertaking
project:
A. City of Arcadia
B. Other (Private)
(1) Name
(2) Address
4. Staff Determination:
The Lead Agency’s Staff, having undertaken and completed a preliminary review of this project in
accordance with the Lead Agency's "Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA)" has concluded that this project does not require further environmental
assessment because:
a. The proposed action does not constitute a project under CEQA.
b. The project is a Ministerial Project.
c. The project is an Emergency Project.
d. The project constitutes a feasibility or planning study.
e. The project is categorically exempt.
Applicable Exemption Class: Section 15061(b)(3)
f. The project is statutorily exempt.
Applicable Exemption:
g. The project is otherwise
exempt on the following basis:
h. The project involves another public agency, which constitutes the Lead Agency.
Name of Lead Agency:
Date:
August 7, 2019
Staff:
Jordan Chamberlin, Associate Planner