HomeMy WebLinkAboutFindings and Action FormARCH CTURAL DESIGN REVIEW 130ARD
I FINDINGS AND ACMON
A. ASSOCIATION NAME.- �N _&x -ac 'kv
B. PROJECT ADDRESS:
C. - PROPERTY OWNER:
ADDRESS (IF DI RENT):
D. FINDINGS (auy check #M9 that apply, and provide a written explanation for each):
1. The proposed cormhuction ARE ARE NOT [] 001
mom 6 le WM to exisfing
11maxim use
2. The
nvftrfws WILLM<,WIL NOT [] hatm s fflcantmkmk_,Umwftm.,
the ov"M a nce of ffw property, because -WIGM Mawr w MWITM Wad on
14V
3, The proposed :pr*d IS O."I'S NOT Q striftarMy
v1sme the adjoining public
lights of way, because
L
4. Th91A IS 011S NOT 0 sign the adjo-ml
properd"
t::sAJ CV
Is. The #=Its c(the ,StrUftffW9 design AR0!6,ARE NOT Q consistent with the q)d8t1rg
b4ming's design because -
IS 0001�
6. The pfc-0 IS NOT 0 in pmportion to 0dw
improvements on the
subject site a �a rovenwts on attw P1 In the nef�bafiood, because
locaf3ore
of the pnc�posed project
WILL []� Vi WILL NOT be use
--ato theand e1r* *.Twd and.value of 9b ----A Property m arx0ghbc)rhwjw, beceUSB
B. The
w_____Pr0J&*_,Sw_LLRXUAw.DQlD0NOT0Provide for sd9qLq9
UftN"ftn
beMW h
ch to sane or adjoining p�ope�s, because
ip
9". OTHER -FINDINGS,
(over)
E. ACTION:
APPROVAL
0 CONDITIONAL APPROVAL., subject to the following condition(s):
[I DENIAL
F. DATE OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARDwS ACTION:
lotiolA
G. CTURAL REVIEW 130ARD MEMBER(S) RENDERING THE ABOVE DECISION:
t.A
H. FMPREuSENTIM THE �ssoc4Kr-iorv.
i. APPEALS.
Appeals the ARBs* ec#-1-n shall be n*wde to. the Planning Commission. Anyone
-2 .
uft*bg to make such an should contact PlannkV SwA= I.br the requirenumft, fees
SO uses. SM appeal must be made In •wriling and ddMwW to Planning SwAm at
240 W. fir., Arcedim CA 91007, within seven M calendar days of the AAWs
J. EXPIRATION OF APPROVAL
If for a pedW of one fl) year ,from to date of I, any - ibt which plans have
been approved by the ARB,, has not begun c6on (as evidenced -I-- #__ evidenced by and
graft and/or "n of a now foundation and/or by kaftflation of raw m, on a
structure that
mm I," MI -1-A)
Is being or, -has beeh unomW, abandoned or d said
approval WMA Me,nail -am void and of no eftt - Such project may be-resubmIftd tD the
ARB for 1 w wwod appwval; however, the ARB "I review the project as if It had not been
prevkxisly approved In acc- wfth the cimvnt standards In effect