Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFindings and Action FormARCH CTURAL DESIGN REVIEW 130ARD I FINDINGS AND ACMON A. ASSOCIATION NAME.- �N _&x -ac 'kv B. PROJECT ADDRESS: C. - PROPERTY OWNER: ADDRESS (IF DI RENT): D. FINDINGS (auy check #M9 that apply, and provide a written explanation for each): 1. The proposed cormhuction ARE ARE NOT [] 001 mom 6 le WM to exisfing 11maxim use 2. The nvftrfws WILLM<,WIL NOT [] hatm s fflcantmkmk_,Umwftm., the ov"M a nce of ffw property, because -WIGM Mawr w MWITM Wad on 14V 3, The proposed :pr*d IS O."I'S NOT Q striftarMy v1sme the adjoining public lights of way, because L 4. Th91A IS 011S NOT 0 sign the adjo-ml properd" t::sAJ CV Is. The #=Its c(the ,StrUftffW9 design AR0!6,ARE NOT Q consistent with the q)d8t1rg b4ming's design because - IS 0001� 6. The pfc-0 IS NOT 0 in pmportion to 0dw improvements on the subject site a �a rovenwts on attw P1 In the nef�bafiood, because locaf3ore of the pnc�posed project WILL []� Vi WILL NOT be use --ato theand e1r* *.Twd and.value of 9b ----A Property m arx0ghbc)rhwjw, beceUSB B. The w_____Pr0J&*_,Sw_LLRXUAw.DQlD0NOT0Provide for sd9qLq9 UftN"ftn beMW h ch to sane or adjoining p�ope�s, because ip 9". OTHER -FINDINGS, (over) E. ACTION: APPROVAL 0 CONDITIONAL APPROVAL., subject to the following condition(s): [I DENIAL F. DATE OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARDwS ACTION: lotiolA G. CTURAL REVIEW 130ARD MEMBER(S) RENDERING THE ABOVE DECISION: t.A H. FMPREuSENTIM THE �ssoc4Kr-iorv. i. APPEALS. Appeals the ARBs* ec#-1-n shall be n*wde to. the Planning Commission. Anyone -2 . uft*bg to make such an should contact PlannkV SwA= I.br the requirenumft, fees SO uses. SM appeal must be made In •wriling and ddMwW to Planning SwAm at 240 W. fir., Arcedim CA 91007, within seven M calendar days of the AAWs J. EXPIRATION OF APPROVAL If for a pedW of one fl) year ,from to date of I, any - ibt which plans have been approved by the ARB,, has not begun c6on (as evidenced -I-- #__ evidenced by and graft and/or "n of a now foundation and/or by kaftflation of raw m, on a structure that mm I," MI -1-A) Is being or, -has beeh unomW, abandoned or d said approval WMA Me,nail -am void and of no eftt - Such project may be-resubmIftd tD the ARB for 1 w wwod appwval; however, the ARB "I review the project as if It had not been prevkxisly approved In acc- wfth the cimvnt standards In effect