HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem No. 1 - MFADR 19-02 TTM 19-04 TRH 19-05 TRE 19-23
DATE: November 26, 2019
TO: Honorable Chairman and Planning Commission
FROM: Lisa L. Flores, Planning & Community Development Administrator
By: Christine Song, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: APPROVING MULTIPLE FAMILY ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW
NO. MFADR 19-02, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. TPM 19-04 (82853),
PROTECTED HEALTHY TREE REMOVAL PERMIT NO. TRH 19-05, AND
PROTECTED TREE ENCROACHMENT PERMIT NO. TRE 19-23 WITH A
CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) FOR A FIVE-UNIT MULTI-
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT AT 314
CALIFORNIA STREET
Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2042
SUMMARY
The applicant, Sanyao International, Inc., on behalf of the property owner, Paul H. Long
and Joyce L. Long Trust, is requesting approval of Multiple Family Architectural Design
Review No. MFADR 19-02, Tentative Tract Map No. TTM 19-04 (82853), Protected
Healthy Tree Removal Permit No. TRH 19-05, and Protected Tree Encroachment Permit
No. 19-23 for a three-story, multi-family residential condominium development with five
units and at grade parking garages. The proposed development and subdivision are
consistent with the City’s General Plan, Development Code, and Subdivision Code. As
an infill development project, the proposed development qualifies for a Categorical
Exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as discussed later in
the staff report. It is recommended that the Planning Commission approve MFADR 19-
02, TTM 19-04 (82853), TRH 19-05 and TRE 19-23, subject to the conditions listed in this
staff report, and adopt Resolution No. 2042 – refer to Attachment No. 1.
BACKGROUND
The subject property is a 12,750 square foot interior lot, located on the south side of
California Street, between South 3rd Avenue and 5th Avenue. The property is zoned R-3,
Resolution No. 2042 - MFADR 19-02, TTM 19-04 (82853),
TRH 19-05, and TRE 19-23
314 California Street
November 26, 2019 – Page 2 of 13
High Density Multiple Family Residential with a General Plan Land Use Designation of
High Density Residential. The site is surrounded by other R-3 zoned properties to the
east, west, and north with R-2 zoned properties to the south of the subject property. The
property is improved with a single-family dwelling with an attached two-car garage, which
were constructed in 1950 – refer to Attachment No. 2 for an Aerial photo with Zoning
Information and Photos of the Subject Property. There are a total of thirteen (13) mature
trees on the subject site and eight (8) trees are proposed for removal, two (2) of which
qualify for protection under the City’s Tree Preservation Ordinance.
A Certificate of Demolition (COD) for the subject property was approved on August 9,
2019, however the structures have not yet been demolished – see Attachment No. 3 for
the Historical Report. Based on the evaluation by an Architectural Historian, the property
does not meet any of the minimum requirements for designation as a historical resource
under federal, state and local criteria. The residence does not embody distinctive
characteristics of a particular architectural style and is not representative of or associated
with any important historical events or people.
PROPOSAL
The applicant requests to demolish the existing single family residence with an attached
two-car garage on the property to construct a three-story, five-unit, multi-family residential
condominium development with surface parking – refer to Attachment No. 4 for the
Tentative Tract Map and Attachment No. 5 for the proposed Architectural Plans. The
project consists of five Spanish style townhomes divided into three buildings. One unit will
consist of three bedrooms and 1968 square feet. Four units will consist of four bedrooms
that vary between 1940 square feet to 2,374 square feet. Unit #1 will have direct access
from California Street and access to the four remaining units will be provided along a
pedestrian walkway located on the east side of the property; the units may also be
accessed through the attached garages (see Figure 1).
Figure 1 – Site Plan CALIFORNIA ST. N
Resolution No. 2042 - MFADR 19-02, TTM 19-04 (82853),
TRH 19-05, and TRE 19-23
314 California Street
November 26, 2019 – Page 3 of 13
The proposed development will have an overall ridge height of 32’-3”; therefore, the
development will be in compliance with the maximum 33’-0” height limit for a pitched roof.
The building provides the minimum front yard setback of 25’-0” as well as all the other
minimum setbacks required in the R-3 zone. Each unit provides at-grade patios to satisfy
the 100 square feet of open space per unit requirement.
A total of thirteen (13) parking spaces will be provided on-site as there will be ten (10)
garage spaces for the five (5) condominiums and three (3) guest parking spaces. The
garages for all the units will be accessed from California Street through the driveway
along the west side of the property. Additionally, there will be two (2) bicycle parking
spaces provided along the east side of the property, adjacent to the pedestrian walkway
between Unit 2 and Unit 3. Based on the number of parking spaces provided, the project
meets the required parking per the Development Code.
The project also includes the removal of two (2) protected trees and encroachment into
the dripline of three (3) protected trees. The protected trees proposed for removal are one
Southern Magnolia tree and one Chinese elm tree. The proposed development will also
encroach within the driplines of three (3) protected trees as discussed later in this staff
report.
ANALYSIS
The R-3 zone requires a minimum density of one dwelling unit per 2,200 square feet of
lot area and a maximum density of one unit per 1,450 square feet of lot area. Based on a
lot size of 12,750 square feet, a minimum of five (5) units and a maximum of eight (8)
units for the subject site can be built on the subject property. The proposed five-unit
development complies with the density requirement of the underlying R-3 zone. The
Development Code requires two (2) covered spaces per unit and one (1) guest space for
every two (2) units. Parking for the project will be provided at-grade and will consist of a
two-car garage for each unit and a total of three (3) paved guest spaces. In addition, the
Development Code requires a minimum of two (2) bicycle parking spaces and they are
located adjacent to pedestrian walkway along the east property line. Therefore, the
project will comply with the parking requirements of the R-3 Zone. Lastly, the project will
also comply with the development standards of the R-3 Zone, with regards to setbacks,
height, open space, and tree preservation.
Concurrent with the subdivision application, the Planning Commission must approve,
conditionally approve, or deny the architectural design of the proposed project. The
project is designed in a contemporary Spanish architectural style (refer to Attachment No.
5) and will consist of a stucco exterior finish with recessed wood paneling along the
second and third floors. The roof will be installed with concrete ‘S’ tile roofing material and
wood rafter tails along the eaves (see Figures 2 & 3). Additional architectural features
include decorative window headers and sills with wood shutters, wrought iron balcony
railings, bronze colored exterior lighting fixtures, and wood corbeling along building
projections. The proposed Spanish style development will be compatible with other
contemporary style existing multi-family developments along California Street as the
Resolution No. 2042 - MFADR 19-02, TTM 19-04 (82853),
TRH 19-05, and TRE 19-23
314 California Street
November 26, 2019 – Page 4 of 13
massing and scale of this project is consistent with others found in the surrounding
neighborhood. The project will also provide landscaping throughout the property, with an
emphasis along the front yard and the west side yard to offer additional screening and
privacy for the adjacent one-story single-family residence to the west.
Figure 2. Proposed front elevation
Tree Removal
Figure 3. Proposed side elevations
Resolution No. 2042 - MFADR 19-02, TTM 19-04 (82853),
TRH 19-05, and TRE 19-23
314 California Street
November 26, 2019 – Page 5 of 13
The applicant is requesting to remove a total of eight (8) trees, two (2) of which are
protected trees, in order to accommodate the project – a Magnolia tree and a Chinese
elm tree, (#2 and 3 in Figure 4). Both trees have a single trunk diameter greater than 12
inches, as noted in the Arborist Report and Landscape Plan (see Attachment 6 for the
Arborist Report, and the Figure 4 below).
Due to excavation of approximately 5’-0” for the building footprint, trees #2 and 3 will not
survive, even if it appears on the plans that the Applicant could reduce the size of the
building or propose pavers instead of a concrete walkway. Additionally, due to the loss of
40 to 50 percent of their canopies for required structural clearance, the trees would not
survive the construction phase and would suffer severe root damage and loss. The
Project will provide four (4) replacement trees to comply with the City’s Tree Preservation
Ordinance. The remaining existing trees will be protected by a tree protection plan
provided in the Arborist Report.
Figure 4. Landscape Plan / Tree Survey
Resolution No. 2042 - MFADR 19-02, TTM 19-04 (82853),
TRH 19-05, and TRE 19-23
314 California Street
November 26, 2019 – Page 6 of 13
In this case, there is sufficient justification for the removal of the two trees. As a remedial
measure, the project will be subject to Condition No. 3, which requires that four (4) 36-
inch box replacement trees be planted as part of the project. The trees will be located
along the front yard and other locations throughout the project that allow for adequate
room to grow.
Tree Encroachment
One (1) Coast Live Oak tree will be preserved as part of the development. Tree #12, as
identified on the Arborist Report and Landscape Plan, is located on the adjacent
neighbor’s property to the west, along the side yard. The proposed development will
encroach to within 15 feet of the trunk and the proposed interlocking paver driveway is
approximately eight (8) feet from the trunk. Based on the Arborist Report, the Oak tree
can be preserved with protective fencing during demolition and construction. The project
is expected to have minimal to moderate impact on the health of the tree.
One (1) American sweetgum tree (tree #1) and one (1) olive tree (tree#11) will also be
preserved as part of the development. Tree #1 is located in the parkway along the front
yard and is expected to be minimally impacted by construction. Tree #11 is located in the
rear yard on the south end of the property and will require minor pruning during
construction of Unit #5. Both trees are expected to survive in good health as long as the
applicant adheres to the tree protection plan.
The proposed development will be consistent with the City’s General Plan, Multifamily
Residential Design Guidelines, Development Code, and the Subdivision Map Act. The
proposed plans have been reviewed by various City Departments, and all City
requirements shall be complied with to the satisfaction of the Building Official, City
Engineer, Planning & Community Development Administrator, Fire Marshal, and Public
Works Services Director.
FINDINGS
Tentative Tract Map
The proposal to subdivide the airspace for five (5) residential condominium units requires
a subdivision through the Tentative Tract Map process – see Attachment No. 4 for
Tentative Tract Map No. TTM 19-04 (82853). The proposed subdivision complies with the
subdivision regulations of the Arcadia Municipal Code and the Subdivision Map Act, and
will not violate any requirements of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board.
The following findings are required for approval of a Tentative Tract Map:
A. The proposed map, subdivision design, and improvements are consistent
with the General Plan, any applicable specific plan, and the Subdivisions
Division of the Development Code.
Resolution No. 2042 - MFADR 19-02, TTM 19-04 (82853),
TRH 19-05, and TRE 19-23
314 California Street
November 26, 2019 – Page 7 of 13
Facts in Support of the Finding: The proposed tentative tract map for a five-unit
multi-family residential condominium development and subdivision of the airspace
with the removal of five (5) protected trees and encroachment into three (3)
protected trees has been reviewed for compliance with the City’s General Plan,
Development Code, and the State Subdivision Map Act. It has been determined
that the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan High Density
Residential Land Use designation and the R-3, High Density Multiple Family
Residential zoning designation. These designations are intended to accommodate
medium to high density, attached or detached residential units such as
condominiums, within the appropriate neighborhoods. The proposed tentative tract
map complies with the Subdivision Map Act regulations and there is no specific
plan applicable to this project. The project will not adversely affect the
comprehensive General Plan and is consistent with the following General Plan
goals and policies:
Land Use and Community Design Element
x Policy LU-1.1: Promote new infill and redevelopment projects that are
consistent with the City’s land use and compatible with surrounding existing
uses.
x Policy LU-4.1: Require that new multi-family residential development be
visually and functionally integrated and consistent in scale, mass, and
character with structures in the surrounding neighborhood.
B. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of
development.
Facts in Support of the Finding: The project site is physically suitable for the
proposed multi-family residential development. The R-3 zone requires a minimum
density of one dwelling unit per 2,200 square feet of lot area and a maximum
density of one unit per 1,450 square feet of lot area. Based on the lot size of 12,750
square feet, a total of five (5) units can be built on this site. The proposed five-unit
development complies with the density requirement as well as all other applicable
zoning requirements including but not limited to parking, setbacks, height, and
open space.
C. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely
to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably
injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
Facts in Support of the Finding: The proposed tentative tract map for five (5)
multifamily residential condominium units is a subdivision of an infill site within an
urbanized area and does not serve as a habitat for endangered or rare species.
The project will not cause substantial environmental damage or impact wildlife.
Resolution No. 2042 - MFADR 19-02, TTM 19-04 (82853),
TRH 19-05, and TRE 19-23
314 California Street
November 26, 2019 – Page 8 of 13
D. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements is not likely to cause
serious public health or safety problems.
Facts in Support of the Finding: The proposed subdivision will construct five (5)
multi-family residential units in compliance with all applicable Building and Fire
Codes to ensure public health and safety. The project will maintain a density lower
than the maximum allowed in the R-3 zone and the proposed development will not
cause any public health or safety problems.
E. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict
with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of,
property within the proposed subdivision (This finding shall apply only to
easements of record or to easements established by judgement of a court of
competent jurisdiction and no authority is hereby granted to a legislative
body to determine that the public at large has acquired easements for access
through or use of property within the proposed subdivision).
Facts in Support of the Finding: The proposed design of the subdivision does
not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or
use of, property within the proposed subdivision. There are no known easements
on the subject property.
F. The discharge of sewage from the proposed subdivision into the community
sewer system will not result in violation of existing requirements specified
by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board.
Facts in Support of the Finding: The Arcadia Public Works Services Department
determined that the City’s existing infrastructure will adequately serve the new
development, and the requirements of the California Regional Water Quality
Control Board will be satisfied.
G. The design of the subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, passive or
natural heating and cooling opportunities.
Facts in Support of the Finding: The proposed tentative tract map and five-unit
multi-family condominium development has been reviewed by Building Services to
ensure compliance with the California Building Code, which includes requirements
associated with heating and cooling requirements.
H. The proposed subdivision, its design, density, and type of development and
improvements conforms to the regulations of the City’s Development Code
and the regulations of any public agency having jurisdiction by law.
Facts in Support of the Finding: The proposed subdivision as conditioned
complies with the density requirements of the City’s Development Code. All the
Resolution No. 2042 - MFADR 19-02, TTM 19-04 (82853),
TRH 19-05, and TRE 19-23
314 California Street
November 26, 2019 – Page 9 of 13
improvements required for the site and each unit will comply with the regulations
in the City’s Development Code.
Architectural Design Review
The proposed development is located in the R-3 zone (High Density Multiple Family
Residential), which is intended to provide medium to high density residential
development. The proposed design of the five-unit condominium project is compatible
with existing multi-family developments in the surrounding neighborhood in terms of
massing and scale. The proposed contemporary Spanish style architecture will be
consistent with other Spanish influenced styles of architecture that exist along California
Street. In addition, the proposed design is consistent with the City’s Multifamily
Residential Design Guidelines.
All City requirements regarding disabled access and facilities, occupancy limits, building
safety, health code compliance, emergency equipment, environmental regulation
compliance, and parking and site design shall be complied with by the property
owner/applicant to the satisfaction of the Building Official, City Engineer, Planning &
Community Development Administrator, Fire Marshal, and Public Works Services
Director, or their respective designees.
Tree Removal and Encroachment
The proposed development requires the removal of eight (8) mature trees, two (2) of
which are protected trees – a Magnolia tree and a Chinese Elm tree, both located in the
front yard area. Due to required excavations and expected loss of 40 to 50 percent of
their canopies for required structural clearance, the trees will not survive the construction
phase and would suffer severe root loss. In compliance with the City’s Tree Preservation
Ordinance, the Project will provide four (4) replacement trees for the loss of these two
trees and at least two (2) new trees will be required to be planted within the front yard
area to provide adequate landscaping along the street frontage.
Three trees – a Coast Live Oak tree (located on the adjacent west neighbor’s property),
an American sweetgum tree, and an Olive tree – will be preserved and protected as part
of the development. Trees #1, 11, and 12, as identified on the Arborist Report and
Landscape Plan, are expected to be minimally impacted during demolition and
construction of the project. Based on the Arborist’s report, the three trees can be
preserved with protective fencing and are expected to survive as long as the applicant
adheres to the tree protection plan.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
It has been determined that the project site is less than five (5) acres; the project site has
no value as a habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species; the proposed project
Resolution No. 2042 - MFADR 19-02, TTM 19-04 (82853),
TRH 19-05, and TRE 19-23
314 California Street
November 26, 2019 – Page 10 of 13
will not have any significant effects upon the environment, and the site can be adequately
served by all the required utilities and public services. Therefore, the project is exempt
under Class 32 (In-Fill Development Projects) pursuant to Section 15332 of the State
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. Refer to Attachment No. 7 for
the Preliminary Exemption Assessment.
PUBLIC NOTICE/COMMENTS
A public hearing notice for this item was published in Arcadia Weekly and mailed to the
property owners located within 300 feet of the subject property on November 14, 2019.
As of November 21, 2019, no comments were received regarding this project.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission approve Multiple Family Architectural
Design Review No. MFADR 19-02, Tentative Tract Map No. TTM 19-04 (82853),
Protected Healthy Tree Removal Permit No. TRH 19-05, and Protected Tree
Encroachment Permit No. TRE 19-23, subject to the following conditions, find that the
project is Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA),
and adopt Resolution No. 2042, subject to the following conditions of approval:
1. Any required mechanical equipment, such as backflow devices, visible from the
public right-of-way shall be screened from public view. Screening may include
landscaping, solid walls or other methods deemed appropriate for the development.
The placement and height of said screening shall subject to review and approval by
the Planning & Community Development Administrator, or designee.
2. The project shall be developed and maintained by the Owner/Applicant in a manner
that is consistent with the plans submitted and conditionally approved for MFADR
19-02, TTM 19-04 (82853), TRH 19-05 and TRE 19-23 subject to the approval of
the Planning & Community Development Administrator, or designee.
3. Four (4) 36-inch box trees (comparable species as the trees being removed) shall
be planted as replacement trees. At least two 36-inch box trees shall be planted in
the front yard area. The remaining trees shall be at least 24-inch box trees and they
shall be located where there is adequate room for growth. The trees shall be shown
on the final landscape plan that is submitted to Building Services for plan check,
subject to review by the Planning & Community Development Administrator, or
designee, to ensure compliance with this condition.
4. Trees #1, #11, and #12, as identified on the Arborist Report and Landscape Plan
shall be protected and preserved. The recommended measures listed in the Arborist
Report, dated June 30, 2019 shall be adhered to. If one or more of said trees are
damaged and/or removed during construction, or if they do not survive within the
first 12 months after the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy by Building Services,
the Planning Division may require six additional replacement trees on the subject
site or another amount deemed acceptable by the Planning Division.
Resolution No. 2042 - MFADR 19-02, TTM 19-04 (82853),
TRH 19-05, and TRE 19-23
314 California Street
November 26, 2019 – Page 11 of 13
5. The Owner/Applicant will be required to pay the following fees prior to approval of
the Tract Map:
Map Fee $100.00
Final Approval Fee (1 lot @ $25.00 ea.) $ 25.00
TOTAL $125.00
6. Prior to approval of the Tract Map, submit a separate demolition and erosion control
plan prepared by a registered civil engineer, and demolish all existing structures.
7. Prior to approval of the Tract Map the Owner/Applicant shall either construct or post
security for all public improvements to be shown on the Tentative Map 82853 and
the following item(s);
A. Remove and replace existing curb and gutter from property line to property line
B. Install new sidewalk from property line to property line
C. Install new driveway per City Standard plan 801-1
8. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be
reviewed and approved by the City Engineer or designee, prior to issuance of a
building permit.
9. A Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan is required and shall be reviewed and
approved by the City Engineer or designee, prior to the issuance of a building permit.
10. All utility conductors, cables, conduits, and wiring supplying electrical, cable and
telephone service to a multiple family building shall be installed underground except
risers which are adjacent to and attached to a building.
11. The project shall comply with the latest adopted edition of the following codes as
applicable:
a. California Building Code
b. California Electrical Code
c. California Mechanical Code
d. California Plumbing Code
e. California Energy Code
f. California Fire Code
g. California Green Building Standards Code
h. California Existing Building Code
i. Arcadia Municipal code
Resolution No. 2042 - MFADR 19-02, TTM 19-04 (82853),
TRH 19-05, and TRE 19-23
314 California Street
November 26, 2019 – Page 12 of 13
12. Grading plans shall be submitted to, and approved by Building & Safety. The grading
plans shall indicate all site improvements, and shall indicate complete drainage
paths of all drainage water run-off.
13. Permits are required prior to the removal and/or demolition of any structures.
14. An 8-inch water main with 79 psi static pressure must be available on the south side
of California St. for domestic water and/or fire services.
15. The Owner/Applicant shall install separate water meter for each condo unit. A
common water meter for each unit can be used to supply both domestic water
services and fire services. Developer shall separate the fire service from domestic
water service with an approved back flow device.
16. A Water Meter Permit Application shall be submitted to the Public Works Services
Department prior to issuance of a building permit.
17. New water service installations shall be installed by the Developer. Installation shall
be according to the specifications of the Public Works Services Department.
Abandonment of existing water services, if necessary, shall be carried out by the
Developer, according to Public Works Services Department.
18. The Owner/Applicant shall utilize existing sewer lateral, if possible.
19. Any drainage fixture elevation that is lower than the elevation of the next upstream
manhole cover (465.83’), an approved backwater valve is required on the lateral at
the right of way, and shall be subject to review and approval by the Public Works
Director, or designee.
20. The Owner/Applicant shall remove Ambar street tree and replace it with a 36-inch
box Chinese Pistache tree. The permit and location shall be reviewed and approved
by the Public Works Services Director, or designee.
21. The Owner/Applicant shall integrate Low Impact Development (LID) strategies into
the site design. These strategies include using infiltration, trenches, bio-retention
planter boxes, roof drains that connects to a landscape area, pervious pavers, etc.
22. The trash enclosure area shall be large enough to accommodate for trash, recycling,
and green waste/organics recycling. The final size of the trash enclosure is subject
to review and approval by the Public Works Director, or designee.
23. The Owner/Applicant shall comply with all City requirements regarding building
safety, fire prevention, detection, suppression, emergency access, public right-of-
way improvements, parking, water supply and water facilities, sewer facilities, trash
reduction and recycling requirements, and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
Resolution No. 2042 - MFADR 19-02, TTM 19-04 (82853),
TRH 19-05, and TRE 19-23
314 California Street
November 26, 2019 – Page 13 of 13
System (NPDES) measures to the satisfaction of the Building Official, Fire Marshal,
Public Works Services Director, and Planning & Community Development
Administrator. Compliance with these requirements is to be determined by having
fully detailed construction plans submitted for plan check review and approval by the
foregoing City officials and employees.
24. The Owner/Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Arcadia
and its officials, officers, employees, and agents from and against any claim, action,
or proceeding against the City of Arcadia, its officials, officers, employees or agents
to attack, set aside, void, or annul any approval or conditional approval of the City of
Arcadia concerning this project and/or land use decision, including but not limited to
any approval or conditional approval of the City Council, Planning Commission, or
City Staff, which action is brought within the time period provided for in Government
Code Section 66499.37 or other provision of law applicable to this project or
decision. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action, or
proceeding concerning the project and/or land use decision and the City shall
cooperate fully in the defense of the matter. The City reserves the right, at its own
option, to choose its own attorney to represent the City, its officials, officers,
employees, and agents in the defense of the matter.
25. Approval of MFADR 19-02, TTM 19-04 (82853), TRH 19-05, and TRE 19-23 shall
not be in effect unless the Property Owner and Applicant have executed and filed
the Acceptance Form with the City on or before 30 calendar days after the Planning
Commission has adopted the Resolution. The Acceptance Form to the Development
Services Department is to indicate awareness and acceptance of the conditions of
approval.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
Approval
If the Planning Commission intends to approve this project, the Commission should move
to approve Multiple Family Architectural Design Review No. MFADR 19-02, Tentative
Tract Map No. TTM 19-04 (82853), Protected Healthy Tree Removal Permit No. TRH 19-
05, and Protected Tree Encroachment Permit No. TRE 19-23, state that the proposal
satisfies the requisite findings, and adopt the attached Resolution No. 2042 that
incorporates the requisite environmental and subdivision findings, and the conditions of
approval as presented in this staff report, or as modified by the Commission.
Denial
If the Planning Commission is to deny this project, the Commission should state the
specific findings that the proposal does not satisfy based on the evidence presented with
specific reasons for denial, and move to deny Multiple Family Architectural Design Review
No. MFADR 19-02, Tentative Tract Map No. TTM 19-04 (82853), Protected Healthy Tree
Resolution No. 2042 - MFADR 19-02, TTM 19-04 (82853),
TRH 19-05, and TRE 19-23
314 California Street
November 26, 2019 – Page 14 of 13
Removal Permit No. TRH 19-05 and Protected Tree Encroachment Permit No. TRE 19-
23 and direct staff to prepare a resolution for adoption at the next meeting that
incorporates the Commission’s decision and specific findings.
If any Planning Commissioner, or other interested party has any questions or comments
regarding this matter prior to the December 10, 2019, Planning Commission Meeting,
please contact Associate Planner, Christine Song at (626) 574-5447, or
csong@ArcadiaCA.gov.
Approved:
Lisa L. Flores
Planning & Community Development Administrator
Attachment No. 1: Resolution No. 2042
Attachment No. 2: Aerial Photo with Zoning Information and Photos of the Subject
Property and Vicinity
Attachment No. 3: Historical Report
Attachment No. 4: Tentative Tract Map No. TTM 19-04 (82853)
Attachment No. 5: Proposed Architectural Plans
Attachment No. 6: Arborist Report
Attachment No. 7: Preliminary Exemption Assessment
Attachment No. 1
Resolution No. 2042
Attachment No. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 2042
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MULTIPLE FAMILY
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. MFADR 19-02, TENTATIVE
TRACT MAP NO. TTM 19-04 (82853), PROTECTED HEALTHY TREE
REMOVAL PERMIT NO. TRH 19-05, AND PROTECTED TREE
ENCROACHMENT PERMIT NO. TRE 19-23 WITH A CATEGORICAL
EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
ACT (“CEQA”) FOR A FIVE-UNIT MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENITAL
CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT 314 CALIFORNIA
STREET
WHEREAS, on July 3, 2019, a Multiple Family Architectural Design Review No.
MFADR 19-02, a Tentative Tract Map No. TTM 19-04 (82853), a Protected Healthy Tree
Removal Permit No. TRH 19-05, and a Protected Tree Encroachment Permit No. TRE
19-23 application, collectively referred to as the “Project” were filed by Sanyao
International, Inc., on behalf of the property owner, Paul H. Long and Joyce L. Long Trust
for a five-unit multi-family residential condominium development which requires
subdivision of the airspace located at 314 California Street; and
WHEREAS, on October 28, 2019, Planning Services completed an environmental
assessment for the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act
(“CEQA”), and recommended that the Planning Commission determine the Project is
exempt under CEQA per Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines because the Project is
considered an in-fill development project; and
WHEREAS, on November 26, 2019, a duly-noticed public hearing was held before
the Planning Commission on said Project, at which time all interested persons were given
full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ARCADIA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
2
SECTION 1. That the factual data submitted by the Community Development
Division in the staff report dated November 26, 2019, are true and correct.
SECTION 2. This Commission finds, based upon the entire record:
A. The proposed map, subdivision design, and improvements are consistent with
the General Plan, any applicable specific plan, and the Subdivisions Division of the
Development Code:
FACT: The Project is consistent with the High Density Residential Land Use
designation. The High Density Residential designation is intended to accommodate
higher-density attached and/or detached residential units, within the appropriate
neighborhoods. The R-3 zone is intended to provide areas for a variety of medium- to
high-density residential development such as condominiums. The Project is in
conformance with the City’s General Plan, Development Code, and the Subdivision Map
Act. The site is physically suitable for the Project and the architectural design for the
Project is compatible with the scale and character of the existing neighborhood. The
Project will not adversely affect the comprehensive General Plan and is consistent with
the following General Plan goals and policies:
Land Use and Community Design Element
x Policy LU-1.1: Promote new infill and redevelopment projects that are
consistent with the City’s land use and compatible with surrounding existing
uses.
x Policy LU-4.1: Require that new multi-family residential development be
visually and functionally integrated and consistent in scale, mass, and
character with structures in the surrounding neighborhood.
3
B. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of
development:
FACT: The R-3 zone has a minimum density of one dwelling unit per 2,200
square feet of lot area, and a maximum density of one unit per 1,450 square feet of lot
area. This calculates to a minimum of five (5) units and a maximum of eight (8) units for
the subject property. The Project complies with the density requirements. In addition,
there are no physical constraints that hinder the development of this site for residential
condominiums.
C. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to
cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or
wildlife or their habitat:
FACT: The Project is a minor subdivision of an infill site within an urbanized area;
therefore, it will not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and
avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
D. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements is not likely to cause
serious public health or safety problems:
FACT: The Project is to subdivide the air space for a five-unit multi-family
condominium development. The construction of the five (5), multi-family residential units
is being done in compliance with Building and Fire Codes and all other applicable
regulations. The proposed density will be below the maximum allowed by the R-3 zone
and the City’s existing infrastructure will adequately serve the new development . In
addition, the Project meets all health and safety requirements, and will not cause any
public health or safety problems.
4
E. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with
easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of, property within
the proposed subdivision (This finding shall apply only to easements of records or to
easements established by judgement of a court of competent jurisdiction and no authority
is hereby granted to a legislate body to determine that the public at large has acquired
easements for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision):
FACT: The Project does not conflict with any easements acquired by the public
at large for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. Based on
the tentative tract map, there are no known easements on the subject properties.
F. The discharge of sewage from the proposed subdivision into the community
sewer system will not result in violation of existing requirements specified by the California
Regional Water Quality Control Board:
FACT: The Arcadia Public Works Services Department determined that the City’s
existing infrastructure will adequately serve the Project, and the requirements of the
California Regional Water Quality Control Board will be satisfied.
G. The design of the subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, passive or natural
heating and cooling opportunities:
FACT: The Project has been reviewed by Building Services to ensure compliance
with the California Building Code, which includes requirements associated with heating
and cooling requirements.
H. The proposed subdivision, its design, density, and type of development and
improvements conforms to the regulation of the Development Code and the regulations
of any public agency having jurisdiction by law:
5
FACT: The Project, as conditioned, complies with the density requirements of the
City’s Development Code, and all the improvements required for the site and each unit
will comply with the regulations in the City’s Development Code. The Project includes the
removal of two (2) protected trees – a Magnolia tree and a Chinese Elm tree, both located
in the front yard area. Due to excavations and loss of 40 to 50 percent of their canopies
for required structural clearance, the trees will not survive the construction phase and
would suffer severe root loss. The Project will provide four (4) replacement trees for the
loss of these two trees and at least two (2) new trees will be required to be planted within
the front yard area to provide adequate landscaping along the street frontage.
I. The proposal is consistent with the City’s Multifamily Residential Design
Guidelines:
FACT: The Project is located within the High Density Residential (R-3) Zone, which
is intended to provide a variety of medium to high density residential development. The
proposed massing, scale, quality of the design and the proposed landscaping are
compatible with other developments in the surrounding neighborhood. The Project will be
compatible with other existing multi-family developments on California Street and in the
surrounding areas. In addition, the Project is consistent with the City’s Multifamily
Residential Design Guidelines.
SECTION 3. Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality
Act (“CEQA”), this Project is a Class 32 Categorical Exemption as an infill-development
project per Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines.
SECTION 4. For the foregoing reasons the Planning Commission determines
that the Project is Categorically Exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act
7
Page Intentionally Left Blank
8
RESOLUTION NO. 2042
Conditions of Approval
1. Any required mechanical equipment, such as backflow devices, visible from the
public right-of-way shall be screened from public view. Screening may include
landscaping, solid walls or other methods deemed appropriate for the development.
The placement and height of said screening shall subject to review and approval by
the Planning & Community Development Administrator, or designee.
2. The project shall be developed and maintained by the Owner/Applicant in a manner
that is consistent with the plans submitted and conditionally approved for MFADR
19-02, TTM 19-04 (82853), TRH 19-05 and TRE 19-23 subject to the approval of
the Planning & Community Development Administrator, or designee.
3. Four (4) 36-inch box trees (comparable species as the trees being removed) shall
be planted as replacement trees. At least two 36-inch box trees shall be planted in
the front yard area. The remaining trees shall be at least 24-inch box trees and they
shall be located where there is adequate room for growth. The trees shall be shown
on the final landscape plan that is submitted to Building Services for plan check,
subject to review by the Planning & Community Development Administrator, or
designee, to ensure compliance with this condition.
4. Trees #1, #11, and #12, as identified on the Arborist Report and Landscape Plan
shall be protected and preserved. The recommended measures listed in the Arborist
Report, dated June 30, 2019 shall be adhered to. If one or more of said trees are
damaged and/or removed during construction, or if they do not survive within the
first 12 months after the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy by Building Services,
the Planning Division may require six additional replacement trees on the subject
site or another amount deemed acceptable by the Planning Division.
5. The Owner/Applicant will be required to pay the following fees prior to approval of
the Tract Map:
Map Fee $100.00
Final Approval Fee (1 lot @ $25.00 ea.) $ 25.00
TOTAL $125.00
6. Prior to approval of the Tract Map, submit a separate demolition and erosion control
plan prepared by a registered civil engineer, and demolish all existing structures.
7. Prior to approval of the Tract Map the Owner/Applicant shall either construct or post
security for all public improvements to be shown on the Tentative Map 82853 and
the following item(s);
9
A. Remove and replace existing curb and gutter from property line to property line
B. Install new sidewalk from property line to property line
C. Install new driveway per City Standard plan 801-1
8. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be
reviewed and approved by the City Engineer or designee, prior to issuance of a
building permit.
9. A Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan is required and shall be reviewed and
approved by the City Engineer or designee, prior to the issuance of a building permit.
10. All utility conductors, cables, conduits, and wiring supplying electrical, cable and
telephone service to a multiple family building shall be installed underground except
risers which are adjacent to and attached to a building.
11. The project shall comply with the latest adopted edition of the following codes as
applicable:
a. California Building Code
b. California Electrical Code
c. California Mechanical Code
d. California Plumbing Code
e. California Energy Code
f. California Fire Code
g. California Green Building Standards Code
h. California Existing Building Code
i. Arcadia Municipal code
12. Grading plans shall be submitted to, and approved by Building & Safety. The grading
plans shall indicate all site improvements, and shall indicate complete drainage
paths of all drainage water run-off.
13. Permits are required prior to the removal and/or demolition of any structures.
14. An 8-inch water main with 79 psi static pressure must be available on the south side
of California St. for domestic water and/or fire services.
15. The Owner/Applicant shall install separate water meter for each condo unit. A
common water meter for each unit can be used to supply both domestic water
services and fire services. Developer shall separate the fire service from domestic
water service with an approved back flow device.
16. A Water Meter Permit Application shall be submitted to the Public Works Services
Department prior to issuance of a building permit.
10
17. New water service installations shall be installed by the Developer. Installation shall
be according to the specifications of the Public Works Services Department.
Abandonment of existing water services, if necessary, shall be carried out by the
Developer, according to Public Works Services Department.
18. The Owner/Applicant shall utilize existing sewer lateral, if possible.
19. Any drainage fixture elevation that is lower than the elevation of the next upstream
manhole cover (465.83’), an approved backwater valve is required on the lateral at
the right of way, and shall be subject to review and approval by the Public Works
Director, or designee.
20. The Owner/Applicant shall remove the Ambar street tree and replace it with a 36-
inch box Chinese Pistache tree. The permit and location shall be reviewed and
approved by the Public Works Services Director, or designee.
21. The Owner/Applicant shall integrate Low Impact Development (LID) strategies into
the site design. These strategies include using infiltration, trenches, bio-retention
planter boxes, roof drains that connects to a landscape area, pervious pavers, etc.
22. The trash enclosure area shall be large enough to accommodate for trash, recycling,
and green waste/organics recycling. The final size of the trash enclosure is subject
to review and approval by the Public Works Director, or designee.
23. The Owner/Applicant shall comply with all City requirements regarding building
safety, fire prevention, detection, suppression, emergency access, public right-of-
way improvements, parking, water supply and water facilities, sewer facilities, trash
reduction and recycling requirements, and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) measures to the satisfaction of the Building Official, Fire Marshal,
Public Works Services Director, and Planning & Community Development
Administrator. Compliance with these requirements is to be determined by having
fully detailed construction plans submitted for plan check review and approval by the
foregoing City officials and employees.
24. The Owner/Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Arcadia
and its officials, officers, employees, and agents from and against any claim, action,
or proceeding against the City of Arcadia, its officials, officers, employees or agents
to attack, set aside, void, or annul any approval or conditional approval of the City of
Arcadia concerning this project and/or land use decision, including but not limited to
any approval or conditional approval of the City Council, Planning Commission, or
City Staff, which action is brought within the time period provided for in Government
Code Section 66499.37 or other provision of law applicable to this project or
decision. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action, or
proceeding concerning the project and/or land use decision and the City shall
cooperate fully in the defense of the matter. The City reserves the right, at its own
11
option, to choose its own attorney to represent the City, its officials, officers,
employees, and agents in the defense of the matter.
25. Approval of MFADR 19-02, TTM 19-04 (82853), TRH 19-05, and TRE 19-23 shall
not be in effect unless the Property Owner and Applicant have executed and filed
the Acceptance Form with the City on or before 30 calendar days after the Planning
Commission has adopted the Resolution. The Acceptance Form to the Development
Services Department is to indicate awareness and acceptance of the conditions of
approval.
----
Attachment No. 2
Aerial Photo with Zoning Information and Photos of
the Subject Property and Vicinity
Attachment No. 2
Overlays
Selected parcel highlighted
Parcel location within City of Arcadia
N/A
Property Owner(s):
Lot Area (sq ft):
Year Built:
Main Structure / Unit (sq. ft.):
R-3
Number of Units:
HDR
Property Characteristics
1950
1,316
1
BOWDEN DEVELOPMENT INC
Site Address:314 CALIFORNIA ST
Parcel Number: 5779-005-002
N/A
Zoning:
General Plan:
N/A
Downtown Overlay:
Downtown Parking Overlay:
Architectural Design Overlay:N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Residential Flex Overlay:
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Special Height Overlay:
N/A
Parking Overlay:
Racetrack Event Overlay:
This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for
reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current,
or otherwise reliable.
Report generated 01-Nov-2019
Page 1 of 1
Subject Site – 314 California Street
West of subject site – 306 California Street
East of subject site – 320 California Street
North of subject site – 309 -315 California Street
View of California Street, facing northwest
View of California Street, northeast
Attachment No. 3
Historical Report
Attachment No. 3
6008 Friends Avenue, Whittier, California 90601-3724 or 1941 E. Pegasus Drive, Tempe, Arizona 85283
(562) 696-3852 (CA Office and FAX) (480) 664-0682 (AZ Office and FAX)
Email = jeanette.mckennaetal@gmail.com
McKenna et al.
History/Archaeology/Architectural History/Ethnography/Paleontology
Jeanette A. McKenna, MA, HonDL
Reg. Professional Archaeologist
Owner and Principal Investigator
June 22, 2019
City of Arcadia
Attn: Lisa Flores/Luis Torrico
240 W. Huntington Drive
Arcadia, California 91066
RE: 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA.
Ms. Flores/Mr. Torrico:
McKenna et al. recently completed an architectural assessment of the property at 314
California Street, a SFR property with an eclectic California Bungalow with California
Ranch influences (ca. 1951-55, with alterations and additions). This property is not
listed in the City’s listing of historically sensitive properties. This property was evaluated
against National Register of Historic Places (National Register) and California Register
of Historical Resources (California Register) eligibility criteria, as well as the recently
adopted local guidelines and policies (Ordinance 2359 and Arcadia Municipal Code, Ar-
ticle IX, Chapter 1).
My evaluation resulted in a determination that this property is not eligible for listing as
an “individually eligible resource” or City “Landmark.” McKenna et al. has assigned a
code of 6Z (see attached forms), pending City concurrence. I am recommending the
City consider this property ineligible for recognition as a historical resource. If you have
any questions, please feel free to contact my office in Whittier, CA.
Sincerely,
JJeanette A. McKenna
Jeanette A. McKenna, Principal
DPR 523A (2/19) * Required Information
State of California
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
Other Listings:
Review Code: 6Z Reviewer: Jeanette A. McKenna Date: June 22, 2019
Page 1 of 59 *Resource Name or # (assigned by recorder) 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA 91006
P1. Other Identifier: APN 5779-005-002
*P2. Location Not for Publication X Unrestricted
*P2a. County: Los Angeles
P2b. USGS 7.5’ Quad: Mt. Wilson Date: 1988 T1N; R11W; NE ¼ of NW ¼ of Sec. 34 ; S.B.B.M.
P2c. Address: 314 California Street City: Arcadia Zip: 91006
P2d. UTMs: NAD 83 Zone: 11 405602 mE 3777952 mN
P2e. Other Locational Data: (e.g.: parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) South side of California
Street; between 3rd Avenue and 4th Avenue; northeast of Duarte Road and Santa Anita Avenue. NAD
27 UTMs = 405683 Easting/3777756 Northing.
*P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and
boundaries.)
See Continuation Sheets
P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes.) HP-2 (Single Family Residential Property)
*P4. Resources Present: □ Building □ Structure □ Object X Site
□ District □ Element of District □ Others (Isolate, etc.)
P5a. Photo or Drawing (Photo Required for Buildings, Structures, and Objects)
P5b: Description of Photo:
June 21, 2019 (S)
*P6. Date of Construction/Age
X Historic □ Prehistoric □ Both
*P7. Owner and Address:
Bowden Development, Inc.
c/o Sanyao International
255 E. Santa Clara Street
Arcadia, California 91006
*P8. Recorded by: McKenna et al.
Jeanette A. McKenna
6008 Friends Avenue
Whittier CA 90601-3724
*P9. Date Recorded: June 22, 2019
*P10. Survey Type: Archit. Assessment
*P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter “None.”) McKenna, Jeanette A. (2019) – An Archi-
tectual Assessment of the Residential Property at 314 California Street, Arcadia, Los Angeles County,
California 91006. On file, McKenna et al., Whittier, California.
*Attachments □ NONE X Location Map X Sketch Map X Continuation Sheet X BSO Record
□ Archaeological Record □ District Record □ Linear Feature Record □ Milling Station Record
□ Rock Art Record □ Artifact Record □ Photographic Record X Other (List): Photos
DPR 523B (5/19) *Required information
State of California The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF
PARKS AND RECREATION
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, and
OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HRI#
Trinomial
Page 2 of 59 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 314 California St., Arcadia, LA Co., CA 91006
*Recorded by: Jeanette A. McKenna *Date: June 22, 2019 X Continuation Update
B1. Historic Name: Paul H. (Joyce L.) and C.C. Long Residence
B2. Common Name: APN 5779-005-002
B3. Original Use: Residential B4. Present Use: Residential
*B5. Architectural Style: Eclectic California Bungalow with California Ranch Influences (altered)
*B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations) 1950-55 residence (3 bed/
2 bath) with 1,316 square feet of living space; third bedroom and second bath added in
1957-58. Garage also constructed in ca. 1950. Additional detail presented on Continuation
Sheets.
* B7. Moved? X No Yes Unknown Date: Original Location:
*B8. Related Features: Detached garage to west side of property; elongated driveway; Land-
scaping.
B9a. Architect: Unknown b. Builder: Paul H. Long
*B10. Significance: Theme: Residential Develop. Area Arcadia, L.A. Co., California
Period of Significance: 1950 + Property Type: Residential Applicable Criteria: NONE
(Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also
address integrity.) This area was originally developed late, post-1932, as it is not covered by the
historic Sanborn Maps. This particular property was not improved until 1950, following the
subdivision of Block 51 of the Santa Anita Tract (mapped as early as 1887). This particular
area was considered “rural” to the core area of the City. No official subdivision map has
been filed for this area, suggesting the owner of Block 51 sold portions throughout the
ownership. The development periods are representative of the population growth and need
for affordable housing in the LA suburbs, especially areas in the San Gabriel Valley, follow-
ing WWII. Arcadia was developed primarily as a middle class community for working class
families both before and after World War II. Many local residents were initially employed by
the Santa Anita Racetrack, but occupations varied considerably following WWII.
B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) NONE
*B12. References: McKenna, Jeanette A. (2019) (Sketch Map with North Arrow Required.)
B13. Remarks: Demolition and Redevelopment
*B14. Evaluator: Jeanette A. McKenna
6008 Friends Avenue
Whittier, California 90601
(562) 696-3852
*Date of Evaluation: June 22, 2019
(This Space is Reserved for Official Comments)
DPR 523J (6/19) *Required information
State of California The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
LOCATION MAP
Primary #
HRI#
Trinomial
Page 3 of 59 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA 91006
Name of Map: USGS Mt. Wilson Scale: 1:24000 Date: 1988
DPR 523L (6/19) *Required information State of California The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATIONCONTINUATION SHEET Primary # HRI# Trinomial Page 4 of 59 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 314 California Street, Arcadia, Los Angeles County, CA 91006 *Recorded by: Jeanette A. McKenna *Date: June 22, 2019 X Continuation Update
DPR 523L (6/19) *Required information State of California The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATIONCONTINUATION SHEET Primary # HRI# Trinomial Page 5 of 59 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 314 California Street, Arcadia, Los Angeles County, CA 91006 *Recorded by: Jeanette A. McKenna *Date: June 22, 2019 X Continuation Update
DPR 523K (6/19) *Required information State of California The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION AERIAL PHOTO Primary # HRI# Trinomial Page 6 of 59 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 314 California, Arcadia, Los Angeles County, CA 91006 Drawn by: Jeanette A. McKenna, McKenna et al., Whittier, CA *Date: June 22, 2019
DPR 523K (6/19) *Required information State of California The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION STREET PHOTO Primary # HRI# Trinomial Page 7 of 59 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 314 California, Arcadia, Los Angeles County, CA 91006 Drawn by: Jeanette A. McKenna, McKenna et al., Whittier, CA *Date: June 22, 2019
DPR 523L (6-19) *Required information State of California The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATIONCONTINUATION SHEET Primary # HRI# Trinomial Page 8 of 59 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 314 California Street, Arcadia, Los Angeles County, CA 91006*Recorded by: Jeanette A. McKenna *Date: June 22, 2019 X Continuation Update
DPR 523L (12/11) *Required information
State of California The Resources Agency DE-
PARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
CONTINUATION SHEET
Primary #
HRI#
Trinomial
Page 9 of 59 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 314 California Street, Arcadia, LA Co., CA 91006
*Recorded by: Jeanette A. McKenna *Date: June 22, 2019 X Continuation Update
DPR 523L (6/19) *Required information
State of California The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
CONTINUATION SHEET
Primary #
HRI#
Trinomial
Page 10 of 59 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 314 California St., Arcadia, LA Co., CA 91006
*Recorded by: Jeanette A. McKenna *Date: June 22, 2019 X Continuation Update
DPR 523L (6/19) *Required information
State of California The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
CONTINUATION SHEET
Primary #
HRI#
Trinomial
Page 11 of 59 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 314 California St., Arcadia, LA Co., CA 91006
*Recorded by: Jeanette A. McKenna *Date: June 22, 2019 X Continuation Update
The current project area is identified as being within the historic Rancho Santa Anita and a “…part
of Arcadia Santa Anita Tract, Block 51 …” (ca. 1887). Block 51 measured 950 feet (east/west) and
400 feet (north/south). When mapped, both California Street and 3 rd Avenue were illustrated, while
neither was actually established until much later. In 1932, the Sanborn Fire Insurance maps iden-
tified Block 51 as City Block 206, reflecting the same measurements, but outside the core area of
the City and not yet considered urban. The earliest available aerial photograph (ca. 1948) illus-
trates activities in the area, but no well-defined property boundaries.
A review of directories identified only two improvements on the 300 block of California Street (south
side) in 1937: Mrs. Martha M. White (widow) at 306 California Street (corner lot) and Paul Wor-
tendyke at 330 California Street. This suggest Block 51 was halved by 1937. Additional research
identied the occupants of 306 California Street in 1928 as Simon E.R. White (Martha), and engineer
who was also a rancher. Born in 1865-66, White was already in his 60s when he purchased the
property, suggesting it was a retirement location (he was living and working in San Fernando in
1923). The improvements at 306 California were originally identified as 304 California Street, but
no permits were found. It is possible, given the original construction date of 1920 for this property,
that the owners prior to the Whites owned all of Block 51. This owner has yet to be identified.
The first evidence of subdivision within Block 51 dates to 1932 (possibly earlier), when the owners
were identified as S.E.R. and Martha M. White (306 California Street) and A.E. Woodmansee (330
California Street). It was not until ca. 1944, when three owners were listed: A.J. Lux (306); G.M.
Lane (330), and Rev. O.D. Lee (334 California Street). It was Rev. Otto D. Lee who initiated addi-
tional building on the block – indicating he purchased a portion of Lane’s property (after 1948).
With respect to the White property, Simon E.R. White died before 1937, as Martha is identified as
a widow. She was still on the property in 1939, but not in 1944, having sold to A.J. Lux. By 1950,
Lux had sold to C.R. Jasinsky and a second occupant was identified as Mrs. Lea Kay (relationship
unknown). E.M. Lewis had established a residence at 320 California Street, but 314 California
Street was not yet listed.
City permits confirmed the 1951 construction of a dwelling and garage at 314 California Street by
C.C. and Paul H. Long (father and son). Paul H. Long is credited with the actual construction.
When originally built, this was a two bedroom, one bath residence with a detached garage. In
1957-58, the Longs added a third bedroom and second bath (completed in 1960. This additional
room appears to have been constructed on the western side of the building. The Longs were still
living on the property in 2007, having re-roofed the residence and garage at least twice (per per-
mits). The County Assessor identifies the improvements as consisting of three bedrooms, two
baths, and 1,316 square feet of living space.
Other alterations to the improvements appear to have been completed without permits.
DPR 523L (6/19) *Required information
State of California The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
CONTINUATION SHEET
Primary #
HRI#
Trinomial
Page 12 of 59 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 314 California St., Arcadia, LA Co., CA 91006
*Recorded by: Jeanette A. McKenna *Date: June 22, 2019 X Continuation Update
A review of aerial photographs show the improvements at 314 California Street in 1952 as consist-
ing of a residence and detached garage. The garage was located near the southwest corner of
the lot and accessed via a long driveway running along the western side of the property. The
residence was roughly “U” shaped with a flat north elevation and two wings on the south elevation,
extending to the south from the east and west sides of the structure. Between the wings as a
covered patio with a roof line that extended slightly south of the wings. Within the added bed and
bath, the residence was closed to 1,100 square feet.
At some point, and without permits, a two car garage was added to the west side of the residence
and another room was constructed to the south, connecting with the original garage. This resulted
in an “L” shaped structure with the new garage exhibiting a two-car bay door on the north elevation.
The re-roofing of these improvements have negated much of the evidence of the additions, but
they are evident from the south side of the structure.
At the time of the recent investigations, McKenna et al. concluded the architectural design of this
residence (and garage) are an eclectic and altered bungalow with California Ranch influences (per
the additions). It is possible these additions all date to the 1950s, while only a portion was actually
done with permits.
As illustrated in the attached photographs, the residence is set back in the property, resulting in a
large front yard and a relatively small rear yard. The structure is wood framed and a raised foun-
dation and exhibits wood and brick siding on the original structure and textured stucco on the ad-
ditions. It is a one story structure with no evidence of a basement.
The north elevation of the residence exhibits the original structure in the center of the building, with
the addition to the east and the garage to the west. This portion of the residence consists of a high
pitched roof with the cross-gable roof on the east side. This area exhibits wood siding beneath the
peak and a wall of red brick on the living floor. .A tri-part window is centered within the brick wall,
consisting of steel framed casement and fixed windows (4:1). Exposed support beams are resent
above the window. The brick appears to be original to the residence.
To the west of the brick wall, the residential wall is recessed and consists of horizontal wood siding
below, capped with a board and batten upper wall. There are two entrances – the main entry facing
west and the secondary entrance facing north. The main entry leads to the living room, while the
secondary entrance appears to be associated with access to the dining and kitchen areas. The
roof above this small, concrete porch is solid and exhibits exposed beams and a wide fascia board.
The room added to the east side of this residence is stucco sided (rough texture) and also exhibits
steel framed fixed and casement windows and a high pitched roof (oriented east/west). The east
DPR 523L (6/19) *Required information
State of California The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
CONTINUATION SHEET
Primary #
HRI#
Trinomial
Page 13 of 59 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 314 California St., Arcadia, LA Co., CA 91006
*Recorded by: Jeanette A. McKenna *Date: June 22, 2019 X Continuation Update
elevation exhibits similar stucco siding, with the depth of the stucco obliterating the relief of the
steel framed casement and fixed windows (two sets). A small attic vent is located under the peak
of the roof and there are no eaves. The siding meets the roof with only a trim board. Floor vents
are also evident, attesting to the raised foundation.
To the west of the original residence is the newer garage – attached to the west wall of the resi-
dence and consisting of a two car garage with a north-facing wooden bay door that appears to be
spring-actioned. The small, covered porch was designed to continue across the front of the garage
(with the same roof overhang), but this expanse has been interrupted by the construction of a
temporary shed (small tool room) that has negated the ability to open the garage door.
Wrapping around to the west side of the garage, there is a steel framed fixed and casement window
panel almost centered below the roof eave. This window was likely moved from the original west
elevation and incorporated into the new construction. The southern extent of the garage is marked
by a presence of a large settlement crack along the point where the rear addition begins. Here,
the roof line is also altered – extending to the south at a slope less than the original residence and
continuing to the point where it incorporates the original garage. The original garage exhibits fixed
and casement windows on the west and south elevations - and also exhibits the same rough stucco
added to the other portion of the residence.
The south elevation is the busiest, exhibiting a flat expanse on the eastern side of the structure
(and adjacent to the addition to the east side of the residence. This elevation exhibits a large
casement window (two panels) and a single, smaller casement window (at the added bathroom).
A closet for the water heater is also present.
To the west of this wing is the enclosed porch/patio, consisting of a raised floor and the contiguous
roof line. The roof is supported by a large, load-bearing beam and simple 1 x 2 posts with screening
to enclose the porch. An access door is located on the east elevation of the porch and a secondary
door is located on the south elevation. The residence within the porch exhibits wood siding (board
and batten design). The door on the south elevation appears to have been relocated to this area,
as the solid wall also looks out-of-place. The east elevation of the original garage meets near this
door and exhibits a steel framed fixed window flanked by casement windows. Its location on the
wall also suggest relocation. The original garage has been converted to living space.
The occupants of this property are obviously into gardening, as there is a soil shed added to the
rear of the original garage, there is a small hot house/greenhouse in the yard, a temporary shed in
the southeastern corner of the rear yard, and numerous potted plants around the property, including
the front yard. The property, as a whole is landscaped, but also somewhat unkempt, with debris
around the garage and in the front yard.
DPR 523L (6/19) *Required information
State of California The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
CONTINUATION SHEET
Primary #
HRI#
Trinomial
Page 14 of 59 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 314 California St., Arcadia, LA Co., CA 91006
*Recorded by: Jeanette A. McKenna *Date: June 22, 2019 X Continuation Update
In general, this residence is in fair to good condition, although in need of some maintenance. It
has been owned by the same family since the original construction in 1951 until at least 2007.
Joyce Long died in 2012, suggesting they may have been on the property later than 2007. No date
of death was found for Paul H. Long. The property improvements have been altered significantly,
through additions, resurfacing, moving windows, and re-roofing. The core area of the residence,
representing the original structure, appears intact, but also exhibits the re-roofing, extension of the
porch, and attachment of the second garage.
A review of the properties surrounding the property at 314 California Street confirmed the improve-
ments at 306 and 314 California Street are the only remaining pre-1985 improvements. The block
is now dominated by modern multi-family properties (condominiums and apartments). Most of
these improvements date between 1985 and 2000. Properties to the east and west, as well as
south (fronting Diamond Street) are all modern redevelopments. There is no district to identify and
the majority of improvements at 314 California Street post-date 1951-1955.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
In April, 2019, the City of Arcadia adopted Ordinance No. 2359: An Ordinance of the City Council
of the City of Arcadia, California, Amending Various Sections of Article IX, Chapter 1 of the Arcadia
Municipal Code (“The Development Code”), with an Exemption under the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA), to Implement a Historic Preservation Ordinance.” This Ordinance was the
result of numerous meetings, studies, and public comment.
The City of Arcadia Zoning Code, Section 9103.17 addresses Historic Preservation. Summarizing
the document, for consideration as a Historic Landmark (resource) in the City of Arcadia, property
improvements must be 45 years of age or older. In addition, the improvements must maintain their
integrity, as defined by the seven criteria listed in the State and Federal guidelines (Location, De-
sign, Setting, Materials, Workmanship, Feeling, and Association). A resources (building, structure,
object, or site) will be eligible for recognition if it meets one or more of the following Criteria:
1. It is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad
patterns of Arcadia’s or California’s history;
2. It is associated with the lives of persons important to local or California history;
3. It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of con-
struction, or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values;
DPR 523L (6/19) *Required information
State of California The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
CONTINUATION SHEET
Primary #
HRI#
Trinomial
Page 15 of 59 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 314 California St., Arcadia, LA Co., CA 91006
*Recorded by: Jeanette A. McKenna *Date: June 22, 2019 X Continuation Update
4. It has yielded, or has the potential to yield, information important to the prehistory or
history of the city or state.
With respect to the integrity of the improvements at 314 California Street, McKenna et al. has con-
cluded the following:
Location: This residence is in its original location (1951-55), although there have
been additions and alterations;
Design: This residence and garage were originally designed as stand-alone
structures, but with the additions and alterations, are now one large
expanse exhibiting variations in design and original materials. As such,
McKenna et al. has concluded the original design is no longer intact.
The intent of this element has NOT been met;
Setting: The setting of California Street, between 3rd. Avenue and 4th Avenue,
has been significantly altered through modern redevelopments. Only
the properties at 306 and 314 California Avenue reflect the earlier im-
provements and both have been impacted by additions, alterations,
and replacement of materials. The original rural setting has been lost,
as has the historic residential developments. The intent of this element
has NOT been meant.
Materials: The residence and garage at 314 California Street have been altered
through additions and the replacement so the original materials. The
original residence has been incorporated into a larger structure and the
additions show evidence of stucco resurfacing. Windows have been
moved and the roof has been replaced at least twice. The original gar-
age has been converted to living space and the second garage has
been impacted to the point the bay door is not operational. While the
core area of the residence appears relatively intact, the extent of alter-
ations, additions, and material replacements have adversely impacted
the building, McKenna et al. has concluded the intent of this element
has NOT been met.
Workmanship: Permits note the original construction was completed by Paul H., Long,
owner of the property. It is highly likely Long is also responsible for the
other improvements and alterations. No data was found to suggest
DPR 523L (6/19) *Required information
State of California The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
CONTINUATION SHEET
Primary #
HRI#
Trinomial
Page 16 of 59 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 314 California St., Arcadia, LA Co., CA 91006
*Recorded by: Jeanette A. McKenna *Date: June 22, 2019 X Continuation Update
there was an architect involved in the planning of the residential design
and there is no data to identify Long as a contractor, craftsman, or ar-
tisan. The design is simple and there is no use of exotic or unique
materials. As such, McKenna et al. has concluded the intent of this
element has NOT been met.
Feeling: In general, “feeling” is subjective. In this case, the alignment of Cali-
fornia Street between 3rd Avenue and 4th Avenue is indicative of a new
(modern) multi-family residential neighborhood. The “feeling” of the
pre-1950 and post-1050 (to ca. 1985) no longer applied. The area is
dominated by modern construction. McKenna et al. has concluded the
intent of this element has NOT been met.
Association: This property is not associated with any identified Tract or Subdivision.
Portions of Block 51 were sold for development, but this began slow
and did not really impact the area until after 1950. None of the property
owners were persons of note and no significant events have been as-
sociated with Block 51. McKenna et al. has concluded the intent of
“association” has NOT been met.
With respect to the “integrity” of 314 California Street, McKenna et al. has concluded that only one
of the seven elements has been met (Location). Lacking the majority of the elements, McKenna
et al. has concluded the property lacks integrity, as defined by the guidelines. Having failed
to meet the “Integrity” requirement, it would be difficult for the property to be considered a local
Landmark (or historical resource). Nonetheless, McKenna et al. addressed the four main criteria
for consideration:
1. It is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad
patterns of Arcadia’s or California’s history?
McKenna et al. found no data to indicate this property is associated with any events
that meet the intent of this criterion. The only association that could be documented
was that of Block 51 of the Santa Anita Tract and the area had been “rural” well into
the 1940s. Such an association is not in keeping with the intent of the local, state, or
federal intent of this criterion. Therefore, Criterion 1 does not apply to this property.
2. It is associated with the lives of persons important to local or California history?
DPR 523L (6/19) *Required information
State of California The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
CONTINUATION SHEET
Primary #
HRI#
Trinomial
Page 17 of 59 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 314 California St., Arcadia, LA Co., CA 91006
*Recorded by: Jeanette A. McKenna *Date: June 22, 2019 X Continuation Update
McKenna et al. found no evidence to suggest this property is associated with any
person important to local or California history. The developer, Paul H. Long – also
the long-term owner/occupant – fails to meet the intent of this criterion and, therefore,
Criterion 2 does not apply to this property.
3. It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of con-
struction, or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values.
As noted above, the residence and garage at 314 California Street are representative
of an eclectic bungalow with Ranch Style design elements incorporated into the sig-
nificantly altered residence. It fails to meet the criteria of any one design and appears
to reflect the personal preferences of the owner/builder. The residence was enlarged
to accommodate the extended family and, more recently, additional alterations have
shifted the use of space within the residence/garage. The materials are simple and
the construction exhibits no outstanding workmanship, unique or exotic materials, or
outstanding design elements. There is no known architect identified. There are no
high artistic values and, overall, the modest improvements fail to meet the minimum
intent of Criterion 3 and, therefore, Criterion 3 does not apply.
4. It has yielded, or has the potential to yield, information important to the prehistory or
history of the city or state.
No evidence was found to suggest the property has a potential to yield any information
important in history or prehistoric (e.g. archaeology or paleontology). No artifacts or
fossils were identified during the property inspection. This does not preclude the
presence of buried resources, but at this time, McKenna et al. has concluded Crite-
rion 4 does not apply to this property.
This property is not listed on the City list of individual historical properties. Overall, the property
has failed to meet any of the required criteria and, therefore, McKenna et al. has determined the
property is not significant and ineligible for recognition as a historically important cultural resource.
McKenna et al. is recommending the City consider the property at 314 California Street be ineligible
for recognition as a City Landmark. It also fails to been the state and federal criteria for recognition
and McKenna et al. has assigned the property a status code of 6Z. Any additional alterations
or redevelopment of this property will not constitute an adverse environmental impact.
Overview of California Street, Arcadia, CA (E)
Overview of California Street, Arcadia, CA (W)
Residence at 306 California Street, Arcadia, CA (1920-1935, 1941, and 1953; SW)
Residence at 306 California Street, Arcadia, CA (1920, 1935, 1941, and 1953, SSE)
MFR Complex at 220 3rd Avenue, Arcadia, CA (1992; N)
MFR Complex at 309-315 California Street, Arcadia, CA (1985; N)
MFR Complex at 309-315 California Street, Arcadia, CA (1985; N)
MFR Complex at 319 California Street, Arcadia, CA (1993; N)
MFR Complex at 321-327 California Street, Arcadia, CA (2000; N)
MFR Complex at 330 California Street, Arcadia, CA (1989; S)
MFR Complex at 320 California Street, Arcadia, CA (1993; SSW)
Driveway Entrance to 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (1950-1955; S)
Front Yard, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (E)
Front Yard, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (ESE)
Front Yard, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (SE)
North Elevation, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (S)
North Elevation, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (SSE)
North Elevation, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (SE)
North Elevation, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (SSW)
North Elevation, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (SSW)
North Elevation, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (WSW)
North Elevation, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (SSE)
North Elevation, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (S)
Main Entry, North Elevation, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (ESE)
Secondary Entry, North Elevation, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (S)
Temporary Shed at Garage Door, North Elevation, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (SW)
Main Entry, North Elevation, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (E)
Porch Overhang and Entry, North Elevation, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (E)
Porch Overhang at Garage Door, North Elevation, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (W)
Garage Door on North Elevation, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (SW)
Western Property Boundary, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (S)
Roof Peak, West Elevation, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (SE)
Window Detail, West Elevation, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (SSE)
West Elevation, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (SSE)
Crawl Space Entrance, West Elevation, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (SE)
Settlement Crack, West Elevation, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (E)
Window Detail, West Elevation, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (SE)
Southern Property Boundary Elevation, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (E)
Window on South Elevation of Addition, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (NE)
Casement Window Detail, South Elevation of Addition, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (NE)
Overview of Western Property Boundary, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (N)
Interior of Shed North of Garage, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (E)
Western Property Boundary, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (N)
Temporary Shed to Northeast of Residence, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (E)
Additional Shed to Northeast of Residence, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (NE)
North Elevation of Eastern Wing, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (SSW)
Concrete Path to Rear Yard, Eastern Property Boundary, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (SSE)
Eastern Property Boundary, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (S)
East Elevation of Residence, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (SSW)
Window Detail, East Elevation, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (SSW)
Roof Peak, East Elevation, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (SW)
Overview of East Elevation, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (N)
South Elevation from Southeast Corner of Residence, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (W)
Raer Yard, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (SW
A/C Unit, Southeast Corner of Residence, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (NE)
Shed in Southeast Corner of Rear Yard, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (SSE)
Small Greenhouse/Potting Shed, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (S)
Rear Gated Yard, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (SW)
Enclosed Rear Porch Entry, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (W)
South Elevation, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (NNE)
Water Heater Closet on South Elevation, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (NW)
Brick Stoop to Enclosed Rear Patio, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (NW)
Crawl Space Entry on South Elevation, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (N)
Enclosed Rear Porch/Patio, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (NNW)
Enlocsed Rear Porch/Patio, South Elevation, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (NW)
Rear Porch and Extended Garage, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (W)
Example of Roof Lines on South Elevation, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (NW)
Enclosed Garden Shed, South of Garage Addition, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (W)
Rear Addition on West Side of Enclosed Porch, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (NW)
Enclosed Porch (and Entry) with Garage Addition, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (NNW)
Enclosed Garden Shed, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (WSW)
Enclosed Shed and Entrance to Garage Addition, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (W)
South Elevation of Addition South of Garage, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (NW)
Rear Yard, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (ESE)
Rear Yard and Porch, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (ENE)
Firewood, Rear Yard, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (SE)
Shed in Rear Yard, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (SE)
Floor Vent, South Elevation of Residence, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (N)
Concrete Path between Front and Rear Yards, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (NNW)
Garage witih Added Shed, North Elevation, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (S)
Overview of Driveway, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (N)
Potted Plants on Abandoned Car, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (ENE)
Front Yard Garden, 314 California Street, Arcadia, CA (ENE)
Attachment No. 4
Tentative Tract Map No. TTM 19-04 (82853)
Attachment No. 4
Attachment No. 5
Proposed Architectural Plans
Attachment No. 5
Attachment No. 6
Arborist Report
Attachment No. 6
314 California St Arcadia, CA 91006
Prepared for:
Robert Tong “SANYAO International Inc.
255 E Santa Clara St # 200
Arcadia, CA 91006
June 30, 2019
Prepared by:
Javier Cabral Consulting Arborist
International Society of Arborists # WE- 8116A
1390 El Sereno Ave
Pasadena, California 91103
(626)818-8704
jctcabral@sbcglobal.net
Robert Tong 314 California St Arcadia, CA 91006 June 30, 2019
Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 1
Table of contents
Summary ----------------------------------------------------------------- pg. 3
Background and assignment Summary ------------------------------ pg. 3
Google Earth Image & Site conditions ------------------------------- pg. 4
List Inventory ------------------------------------------------------------ pg. 5
Site Survey With Trees-------------------------------------------------- pg. 6
Protected Tree Removal Application & Analysis ------------------ pg. 7 thru 10
Tree Pictures ------------------------------------------------------------- pg. 11 thru 20
Protection Guidelines --------------------------------------------------- pg. 21 thru 29
Certificate of performance --------------------------------------------- pg. 30
Arborist Signature Page ------------------------------------------------ Pg. 31
Robert Tong 314 California St Arcadia, CA 91006 June 30, 2019
Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 2
Summary
Mr. Tong,
You have retained my consulting arborist services to provide a tree inventory and protection plan for the
property described as 314 California St Arcadia, CA 91006. You are in the planning process of demolishing the
existing single family home and redeveloping the property with a new 5 unit condominium.
The proposed demolition and construction is expected to have moderate to minimal to impact to the protected
trees that will remain due to the distance of excavations, trenches, and footings to the tree trunks. A complete tree
protection plan will be included to protect above and below ground tree parts from physical damage, soil
compaction, and chemical damage.
Background and assignment
Mr. Tong has requested that I provide the following arboricultural services.
1) Identify all trees on the property and label them on the architectural drawings as provided to the
arborist by Mr. Robert Tong.
2) Evaluate the current health of the trees and possible impacts of the proposed construction based
on the provided site plan and make recommendations.
3) Provide a tree protection plan that will help ensure the short and long term health of the trees that
will remain during and after construction activities are completed.
The following report is based on my site visit on June 25, 2019 and my analysis of the trees, site plan,
and surrounding landscape. For the purpose of this report I will address these trees as Trees # 1 thru 13.
Robert Tong 314 California St Arcadia, CA 91006 June 30, 2019
Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 3
Site conditions
A one story single family home currently exists on this property located 314 California St Arcadia, CA 91006.
1) There are 11 total trees on the subject project property and two off-site trees that will be inventoried and
protected due to their proximity to the property line.
2) There are 8 trees proposed to be removed 3 of which qualify for protection per the City of Arcadia Tree
Protection Ordinance. The remaining trees will be protected per the tree protection plan contained in this
arborist report.
Google Earth Image
Robert Tong 314 California St Arcadia, CA 91006 June 30, 2019
Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 4
List Inventory pg. 1
Robert Tong 314 California St Arcadia, CA 91006 June 30, 2019
Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 5
Site Plan With Trees (cropped)
Robert Tong 314 California St Arcadia, CA 91006 June 30, 2019
Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 6
Protected Tree Removal Analysis:
Tree # 2 Southern magnolia:
This Magnolia tree would not be expected to survive at the proposed distance to Unit # 2. The proposed distance
of the tree trunk to the Unit # 1 is 2.9 ft.; the diameter of the tree is 17 inches, the proposed distance of the tree
trunk to the building makes it 2 times the diameter of the tree trunk. At this distance and because this species of
tree does not tolerate root loss well this close to the trunk it is my opinion that the tree would not survive the
excavations and would soon die or fail due to root loss.
Tree # 2 Southern magnolia Mitigation:
Based on the provided site plan and the close proximity of the tree trunk to the proposed Unit # 1 there are no
reasonable mitigation measures that will preserve this tree in good health or prevent it from declining into an
unhealthy and hazardous tree. It is my opinion based on the site plan that this tree be removed and replaced
with three 36 inch box trees. The replacement trees shall be shown on the landscape plan per City of
Arcadia requirements.
Tree # 3 Chinese elm:
This Chinese elm tree would not be expected to survive in good health at the proposed distance to Unit # 1. The
proposed distance of the tree trunk to the Unit # 1 is 10 ft. the diameter of the tree is 24 inches, the proposed
distance of the tree trunk to the building makes it 5 times the diameter of the tree trunk. At this distance and
because there will be further encroachment by the two walkways and the loss of 40 to 50 percent of its canopy for
structural clearance removal is recommended.
. Tree # 3 Chinese elm:
Based on the provided site plan and the close proximity of the tree trunk to the proposed Unit # 1 there are no
reasonable mitigation measures that will preserve this tree in good health or prevent it from declining into an
unhealthy and hazardous tree. It is my opinion based on the site plan that this tree be removed and replaced
with three 36 inch box trees. The replacement trees shall be shown on the landscape plan per City of
Arcadia requirements.
Tree # 6 Olive:
This Olive tree would not be expected to survive at the proposed distance to Unit # 2. The tree trunk sits directly
on the footprint of the north wall of this unit and major roots and part of the tree trunk would have to be destroyed
to accomplish construction of this unit. At this distance and because this species of tree does not tolerate root and
trunk damage well this close to the trunk it is my opinion that the tree would not survive the excavations and
would soon die or fail due to root loss.
Tree # 6 Olive Mitigation:
Based on the provided site plan and the close proximity of the tree trunk to the proposed Unit # 2 there are no
reasonable mitigation measures that will preserve this tree in good health or prevent it from declining into an
unhealthy and hazardous tree. It is my opinion based on the site plan that this tree be removed and replaced
with four 36 inch box trees. The replacement trees shall be shown on the landscape plan per City of
Arcadia requirements.
Robert Tong 314 California St Arcadia, CA 91006 June 30, 2019
Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 7
Removal Permit Application Pg. 1
Robert Tong 314 California St Arcadia, CA 91006 June 30, 2019
Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 8
Removal Permit Application Pg. 2
Robert Tong 314 California St Arcadia, CA 91006 June 30, 2019
Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 9
Removal Permit Application Pg. 3
Robert Tong 314 California St Arcadia, CA 91006 June 30, 2019
Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 10
Trees # 1 (facing south )
Robert Tong 314 California St Arcadia, CA 91006 June 30, 2019
Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 11
# 1 American sweetgum
(DBH = 5+6 in.)
Tree # 2 (facing south)
Robert Tong 314 California St Arcadia, CA 91006 June 30, 2019
Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 12
# 2 Southern magnolia
(DBH = 17 in.)
Tree # 3 (facing east)
Robert Tong 314 California St Arcadia, CA 91006 June 30, 2019
Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 13
# 3 Chinese elm
(DBH = 24 in.)
Trees # 4 & 5 (facing east)
Robert Tong 314 California St Arcadia, CA 91006 June 30, 2019
Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 14
# 4 Crape myrtle
(DBH = 4 in.)
# 5 Avocado
(DBH = 8+9+10+16
Trees # 6 thru 8 (facing northeast)
Robert Tong 314 California St Arcadia, CA 91006 June 30, 2019
Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 15
# 8 Silver maple
(DBH = 21 in.)
# 6 Olive
(DBH = 16+16+17 in.)
Tree # 9 (facing west)
Robert Tong 314 California St Arcadia, CA 91006 June 30, 2019
Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 16
# 9 Strawberry tree
(DBH = 6+6 in.)
Tree # 10 (facing east)
Robert Tong 314 California St Arcadia, CA 91006 June 30, 2019
Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 17
# 10 Carrotwood
(DBH = 13 in.)
Tree # 11 (facing northeast)
Robert Tong 314 California St Arcadia, CA 91006 June 30, 2019
Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 18
# 11 Olive
(DBH = 17 in.)
Tree # 12 off-site (facing southwest)
Robert Tong 314 California St Arcadia, CA 91006 June 30, 2019
Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 19
# 12 Coast live oak
(DBH = 60 estimated)
Tree # 13 off-site (facing south)
Robert Tong 314 California St Arcadia, CA 91006 June 30, 2019
Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 20
# 13 Crape myrtle
(DBH = 6+8+9+9+9)
General Tree Protection Guidelines
1) Avoid damaging the roots, stem, and branches with mechanical and manual equipment. No roots shall be
severed within the Tree Protection Zone “TPZ” which is the same as the area within the Tree Protection
Fencing “TPF” unless authorized by the Consulting Arborist. Roots greater than two inches in diameter
outside of the TPZ shall be cleanly severed with a sharp tool such as a hand saw or manual pruners.
2) Avoid soil compaction by prohibiting the use of heavy equipment such as backhoes and bobcats under the
tree drip line. If access within the TPZ is required during the construction process, the route shall be covered
in a 6 inch layer of mulch in the TPZ and the area shall be aerated and fertilized at the conclusion of
construction.
3) Do not store or park tools, equipment, vehicles, or chemicals under the tree drip line. No equipment or
debris of any kind shall be placed within the TPZ. No fuel, paint, solvent oil, thinner, asphalt, cement, grout,
or any other construction chemical shall be stored or allowed in any manner to enter within the TPZ.
4) Avoid washing of equipment and tools such as wheel barrels, shovels, and mechanical motors under the tree
drip line.
5) Prevent flooding and pooling of service water under the drip line. Grade changes that will flood the TPZ are
prohibited unless a drainage plan is implemented. No grade changes within the TPZ shall be allowed.
6) Avoid cutting tree roots whenever possible. This can sometimes be accomplished by bridging roots,
tunneling, or radial trenching. If roots must be cut use a sharp tool that will make a clean flush cut and not tear
the roots. If possible all digging under the tree drip line should be done manually to avoid tearing out of roots.
Roots outside of the TPZ may be cleanly severed vertically with a sharp garden tool.
7) Do not raise or lower the grade within the tree protection zone of any protected trees unless approved by the
project arborist. Roots greater than 1 inch in diameter that are exposed or damaged shall be cut with a sharp
tool such as a hand saw, pruners, or loppers and covered with soil in conformance to industry standards. If
any work is required within the TPZ the Arborist shall be consulted previous to beginning. The Arborist shall
be contacted as soon as possible to arrange for a timely inspection and prevent delays.
8) Place a protective barrier or temporary fencing as directed by the consulting arborist in the diagram below.
The protection fencing shall be in place before demolition begins and shall only be removed or reduced
when all heavy equipment such as back-hoes, bobcats, loaders, and other heavy equipment with tires
and tracks will not be required. Fencing can be adjusted or sections reduced or removed as the project
advances into the landscaping phases of the project. The consulting arborist shall be contacted if there are
doubts about the placement or removal of fencing.
Robert Tong 314 California St Arcadia, CA 91006 June 30, 2019
Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 21
9) Landscape preparation & excavation within the TPZ shall be limited to the use of hand tools and small
hand-held power tools and shall not be of a depth that could cause root damage. No attachments or wires
other than those of a protective or non-damaging method shall be attached to a protected tree.
10) Construction personnel should be briefed on the importance of the guidelines before construction begins
and reminded of it during tailgate meetings and as necessary. A printed copy should be posted where
employees can be reminded of it.
11) All protected trees shall be watered before, during, and after construction as needed to prevent drought
stress and tree death until sprinklers have been installed and are functional.
Robert Tong 314 California St Arcadia, CA 91006 June 30, 2019
Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 22
Site Plan With Protection Fencing
Robert Tong 314 California St Arcadia, CA 91006 June 30, 2019
Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 23
Site Plan With Demolition & Grade Beam Notes
Robert Tong 314 California St Arcadia, CA 91006 June 30, 2019
Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 24
Landscape Plan
Robert Tong 314 California St Arcadia, CA 91006 June 30, 2019
Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 25
Tree # 1 American sweetgum Protection Details
a) Structural excavation and over-excavation: Structural Excavation: This tree will not be impacted by
any structural excavations.
b) Driveway: The excavation for the driveway adjacent the tree trunk and south of the tree trunk shall be
as minimal as possible and done manually with hand held tools only.
c) New Landscaping: This tree is not expected to be impacted negatively by the rose bushes.
d) New Sprinklers: No broadcast trenching shall be done within 6 ft. of these Oak trees and drip irrigation
is recommended if plants will be placed within the drip lines.
e) Canopy pruning: No pruning will be required to complete the proposed construction project.
f) Root pruning: Roots encountered within 4 ft. of this tree shall be cleanly severed with sharp pruning
equipment.
g) Protection Fencing: shall consist of 6 ft. high chain link free standing panels and shall be in place before
any works begins including demolition. All protection fencing may be removed or reduced when all
heavy equipment and major construction is completed and landscaping is ready to be installed.
h) Maintenance: During the hot summer months the tree shall be watered as needed until the sprinkler
system is installed and working.
i) Encroachment impacts: This project is expected to have a minimal to moderate impact on the short or
long term health of this tree and it is expected to survive in good health if the protection
recommendations are followed and adhered to.
Robert Tong 314 California St Arcadia, CA 91006 June 30, 2019
Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 26
Trees # 10 & 11 Carrotwood & Olive Protection Details
a) Structural excavation and over-excavation: Structural Excavation: the impact of structural
excavations for the proposed 2 garage, Building # 3, and Concrete paving is expected to have minimal
to moderate impact to these trees if the protection plan is adhered to,
b) Driveway and walkways: This tree will not be impacted by the driveway. Excavation for the walkway
just south of Tree # 2 shall have a minimal excavation done manually or set on grade to avoid
disturbing or damaging important roots of Tree # 2.
c) New Landscaping: Plants within 8 ft. of the tree trunk shall be relocated if roots greater than two
inches are encountered.
d) New Sprinklers:. No broadcast trenching shall be done within 8 ft. of the tree trunk of this tree.
e) Canopy pruning: Minor pruning will be required to complete the proposed construction project.
f) Root pruning: Any roots encountered 8 ft. from the tree trunks and beyond can be cleanly severed with
sharp pruning tools.
g) Protection Fencing: shall consist of 6 ft. high chain link free standing panels and shall be in place before
any works begins including demolition. All protection fencing may be removed or reduced when all
heavy equipment and major construction is completed and landscaping is ready to be installed.
h) Maintenance: During the hot summer months the tree shall be watered as needed until the sprinkler
system is installed and working.
i) Encroachment impacts: This project is expected to have a minimal to moderate impact on the short or
long term health of this these trees and they are expected to survive in good health if the protection
recommendations are followed and adhered to.
Robert Tong 314 California St Arcadia, CA 91006 June 30, 2019
Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 27
Tree # 12 Off-Site Oak Protection Details
a) Structural excavation and over-excavation: Structural Excavation: This Oak tree trunk is
approximately 34 ft. from the edge of the proposed Buildings # 2 & 3 two car garages. The distances of
the proposed structures are far enough that the impact is expected to be minimal.
a) Driveway: The proposed interlocking paver driveway is approximately 8 ft. from the trunk of this Oak
tree and the proposed grade beam is approximately 7 ft.. Although the driveway is proposed mostly on
the footprint of the existing driveway and existing house at this distance it is extremely important that
care be taken to minimize root damage and soil compaction. The Consulting Arborist shall be present
during demolition of the existing driveway to inspect and ensure that all measures to minimize damage
to the roots are implemented.
b) New Landscaping: This tree is not expected to be impacted by any plants or new plantings as the
Landscape architect has avoided new plantings in the direct vicinity of this tree.
c) New Sprinklers: No sprinkler excavations or applications will impact this tree.
d) Canopy pruning: Some pruning may be required for building clearance. Pruning shall be completed
between the months of July through September and to International of Arboriculture Standards.
e) Root pruning: The Consulting Arborist shall decide during the demolition and excavation inspections
which roots shall be severed or preserved. Sufficient notice shall be given to the Consulting Arborist to
schedule site inspection for the demolition of the existing driveway and proposed grade beam.
f) Protection Fencing: shall consist of 6 ft. high chain link free standing panels and shall be in place before
any works begins including demolition. All protection fencing may be removed or reduced when all
heavy equipment and major construction is completed and landscaping is ready to be installed. See
Protection Fencing Plan.
g) Maintenance: During the hot summer months the tree shall be watered as needed until the sprinkler
system is installed and working.
h) Encroachment impacts: This project is expected to have a minimal to moderate impact on the short or
long term health of this tree and it is expected to survive in good health if the protection
recommendations are followed and adhered to.
Robert Tong 314 California St Arcadia, CA 91006 June 30, 2019
Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 28
Tree 13 # Off-Site Crape myrtle: This tree will not be impacted by this proposed development as it
is too small and its roots will not be impacted.
b) Structural excavation and over-excavation: Structural Excavation: no impact expected
c) Driveway: no impact expected.
d) New Landscaping: no impact expected.
e) New Sprinklers: no impact expected.
f) Canopy pruning: no impact expected.
g) Root pruning: no impact expected.
h) Protection Fencing: no impact expected.
i) Maintenance: During the hot summer months the tree shall be watered as needed until the sprinkler
system is installed and working.
j) Encroachment impacts: This project is expected to have a moderate to minimal impact on the short or
long term health of these trees and they are expected to survive in good health if the protection
recommendations are followed and adhered to.
Robert Tong 314 California St Arcadia, CA 91006 June 30, 2019
Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 29
Certificate of Performance & Limiting Conditions
I Javier Cabral certify the following:
x No warranty is made, expressed or implied, that problems or deficiencies of the trees or the property will not
occur in the future, from any cause. The Arborist shall not be responsible for damages or injuries caused by any
tree defects, and assume no responsibility for the correction of defects or tree related problems.
x The owner and client of the trees may choose to accept or disregard the recommendations of the Arborist or
seek additional advice if the owner decides not to accept the Arborists findings or recommendations.
x The Arborist has no past, present or future interest in the removal or preservation of any tree. The opinions
contained in the Arborist report are independent and objective judgements of the Arborist.
x The findings, opinions, and recommendations of the Arborist are based on based on the physical inspection of
said property. The opinions are based on knowledge, experience, and education.
x The Arborist shall not be required to provide testimony, provide site monitoring, provide further documentation
for changes beyond the control of the Arborist, be deposed, or to attend any meeting without contractual
arrangements for additional fees to the Arborist.
x The Arborist assumes no responsibility for verification of ownership or location of property lines, or for any
recommendations based on inaccurate information.
x This Arborist report may not be reproduced without the expressed written permission or the Arborist and the
client to whom the report was provided to. Any changes or alteration of this report invalidates the entire report.
x Arborists are tree specialists who use their education, knowledge, training and experience to examine trees,
recommend measures to enhance the beauty and health of trees, make recommendations to prevent or minimize
damage to trees during and after construction projects, and attempt to reduce the risk of living near trees.
Clients may choose to accept or disregard the recommendations of the arborist, or to seek additional advice.
x Arborists cannot detect every condition that could possibly lead to the structural failure of a tree. Trees are
living organisms that fail in ways we do not fully understand. Conditions are often hidden within trees and
below ground. Arborists cannot guarantee that a tree will be healthy or safe under all circumstances, or for a
specified period of time. Likewise, remedial treatments, like any medicine, cannot be guaranteed.
x Treatment, pruning and removal of trees may involve considerations beyond the scope of the arborist’s services
such as property boundaries, property ownership, site lines, disputes between neighbors, and other issues.
Arborists cannot take such considerations into account unless complete and accurate information is disclosed to
the arborist. An arborist should then be expected to reasonably rely upon the completeness and accuracy of the
information provided.
x Trees can be managed, but they cannot be controlled. To live near trees is to accept some degree of risk. The
only way to eliminate all risk associated with trees is to eliminate all trees.
Robert Tong 314 California St Arcadia, CA 91006 June 30, 2019
Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 30
Robert Tong 314 California St Arcadia, CA 91006 June 30, 2019
Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 31
Attachment No. 7
Preliminary Exemption Assessment
Attachment No. 7
Preliminary Exemption Assessment FORM “A”
PRELIMINARY EXEMPTION ASSESSMENT
(Certificate of Determination
When Attached to Notice of Exemption)
Date: October 28, 2019 Staff: Christine Song, Associate Planner
1. Name or description of project: MFADR 19-02, TTM 19-04 (82853), TRH 19-05 and TRE 19-23
– A tentative tract map for a five-unit residential condominium
development with a Categorical Exemption under the California
Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”)
2. Project Location – Identify street
address and cross streets or
attach a map showing project site
(preferably a USGS 15’ or 7 1/2’
topographical map identified by
quadrangle name):
314 California Street (3rd Avenue and 5th Avenue)
3. Entity or person undertaking
project:
A.
B. Other (Private)
(1) Name Sanyao International, Inc.
(2) Address 255 E. Santa Clara Street, Suite 208
Arcadia CA 91006
4. Staff Determination:
The Lead Agency’s Staff, having undertaken and completed a preliminary review of this project in
accordance with the Lead Agency's "Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA)" has concluded that this project does not require further environmental
assessment because:
a. The proposed action does not constitute a project under CEQA.
b. The project is a Ministerial Project.
c. The project is an Emergency Project.
d. The project constitutes a feasibility or planning study.
e. The project is categorically exempt.
Applicable Exemption Class: 15332 – Class 32 (In-fill development project)
f. The project is statutorily exempt.
Applicable Exemption:
g. The project is otherwise
exempt on the following basis:
h. The project involves another public agency which constitutes the Lead Agency.
Name of Lead Agency: