HomeMy WebLinkAboutFindings and Action Form(HOA NAME)
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD
Findings and Action Report
-1-
Date: January 22, 2020 File No.
Project Address: 928 Paloma Dr
Association Name: Rancho Santa Anita
Applicant Name: Xiu Jing Li
Property Owner(s) Name: Xiu Jing Li
Project Description: New Single Family Residence
FINDINGS
Only check those that are apply and provide a written explanation for each
The proposed project is, is not consistent with the Site Planning Principles
and Neighborhood Context Guidelines.
Explanation:
The proposed project is, is not consistent with the Forms and Mass Guidelines.
Explanation:
The proposed project is, is not consistent with the Frontage Conditions
Guidelines.
Explanation:
The proposed project is, is not consistent with the Garages and Driveways
Guidelines.
Explanation:
The proposed project is, is not consistent with the Architectural Styles
Guidelines.
Explanation:
DocuSign Envelope ID: 880114E7-F78F-4912-AB07-688157E67D6A
X
X
X
X
X
(HOA NAME)
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD
Findings and Action Report
-2-
The proposed project is, is not consistent with the Height, Bulk, and Scale
Guidelines.
Explanation:
The proposed project is, is not consistent with the Roofline Guidelines.
Explanation:
The proposed project is, is not consistent with the Entries Guidelines.
Explanation:
The proposed project is, is not consistent with the Windows and Doors
Guidelines.
Explanation:
The proposed project is, is not consistent with the Articulation Guidelines.
Explanation:
The proposed project is, is not consistent with the Facade Details Guidelines.
Explanation:
The proposed project is, is not consistent with the Colors and Materials
Guidelines.
Explanation:
DocuSign Envelope ID: 880114E7-F78F-4912-AB07-688157E67D6A
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
(HOA NAME)
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD
Findings and Action Report
-3-
The proposed project is, is not consistent with the Accessory Lighting
Guidelines.
Explanation:
The proposed project is, is not consistent with the Additions, Alterations, and
Accessory Buildings/Structures Guidelines.
Explanation:
The proposed project is, is not consistent with the Hillside Properties
Guidelines.
Explanation:
The proposed project is, is not consistent with the Fences, Walls, Gates, and
Hedges Guidelines.
Explanation:
The proposed project is, is not consistent with the Impervious Coverage and
Landscape Areas Guidelines.
Explanation:
ACTION
Pursuant to City’s Development Code Section 9107.20.050, a Site Plan and Design Review in the
Homeowners Association Areas may be approved only if it is foun d that the proposed development
is consistent with the City’s adopted Design Guidelines.
APPROVED CONDITIONALLY APPROVED DENIED
Date of ARB Meeting:
ARB Members Rendering the Above Decision:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
DocuSign Envelope ID: 880114E7-F78F-4912-AB07-688157E67D6A
1-16-2020
0
Not applicable
X
X
Not applicable
X
X
5
Rick Fricke, Lou Pappas,Bob Eriksson, Greg Mederios, Philip Chan
(HOA NAME)
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD
Findings and Action Report
-4-
Conditions of Approval:
Reason for Denial:
There is a ten (10) day appeal period for this application. To file an appeal, a completed
Appeal Application form must be submitted to the City’s Planning Division along with a
$600.00 appeal fee by _________ p.m. on__________________________. You will be
notified if an appeal is filed.
Approved designs shall expire in one year (_Insert date - The above date plus one day_)
from the effective date unless plans are submitted to Building Services for plan -check, a
building permit is issued and the construction is diligently pursued, a certificate of
occupancy has been issued, or the approval is renewed. The final plans must be
consistent with the approved design concept plans and any conditions of approval. Any
inconsistency from the approved design concept plans may preclude the issuance of a
building permit.
An extension may be granted by the ARB or designee, or the Review Authority that
approved the project for a maximum period of one (1) year from the initial expiration date.
An extension can only be granted if the required findings can be made. Please note that
acceptance of an extension request does not indicate approval of an extension.
You may visit the City’s website at www.ArcadiaCA.gov/noticesanddecisions to view this
document. If you have any questions regarding the above decision, please contact the
ARB Chairperson at (Insert phone no. and email). Thank you.
c: City of Arcadia, Planning Division
DocuSign Envelope ID: 880114E7-F78F-4912-AB07-688157E67D6A
None
(HOA NAME)
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD
Findings and Action Report
-5-
DocuSign Envelope ID: 880114E7-F78F-4912-AB07-688157E67D6A