No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutUntitled � ..� City of Arcadia, CA Permit NO.SNew-18-20674410.w, Development Services Department Permit Type:Single Family New 240 West Huntington Drive,Post Office Box 60021 r Work Classification:SFR-New Dwelling Arcadia,CA 91066-6021 (626)574-5416 Permit Status:Issued AR( AI)IA , Issu- = e:11/05/2018 I Expiration: 05/04/2019 Addr NO. Dir Prefix Street Name Street Suffix Unity,State,Zip Parcel Number --- -- 758 Hampton RD Am.ia,CA 5769010002 Contacts -.EI - ------ -- - vZEYONG LU Owner 895 SINGING WOOD DR,ARCADIA,CA V - \ 1 Description:7 bed,7.5 bath,foyer,great hall,fam'y,living, Valuation: $ 1,1• 5.72 Tenant dining,coat room,butler pantry, pantry, ' hen, or room, breakfast nook,theatre,laundry, torag= . r Total Sq Fe t: •.00 Plan Check#18-2067 Plan#32628 elevator, (2)2 car attached garage, ,. Fees •rnou Payments Amount Paid Building Issuing Fee $".35 Total Fees $24,381.32 Building Permit Fees 875.60 Cash/Re • it REC-00 = 0- $24,381.32 Grading Issuan FeeNI $44.35 Amount 6 $0.00 Grading Perm' Fee(1-1000 $450.00 Green Buildi ;Standard $43.00 ,re---1 LID Plan Che. Fee \ $100.00( ) "-....,...........) Off Site Plan a eck(Per Site) $240.00 Parks&Recre.''on Fee(SFR) $12,785.10 Single Family/C,ndo/Townhome I pact $1,983.00 Fee Solid Waste Mana.ement Fee $6.25 CALLS FOR INSPECTIONS Strong Motion Inst. • .gra a 'es $138.32 Reque r in ection by telephone at 626-574-5450. Leave a message SWMF FEE 2 $1.00 requesting th ress,timeframe and what inspection item is needed. SWMF FEE 2 $1.00 WELO Permit Fee $625.00 WELO Permit Issuance $44.35 This permit/plan review expires by time limitation and becomes null and Total: $24,381.32 void if the work authorized by th permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of issuance or if th permit is not obtained within 180 days from the date of plan submittal.T is permit expires and becomes null and void if any work authorized by tçvorkis a it is suspended or abandoned for 180 consecutive days or if no pro•, has been verified by a City of D Arcadia building .ector ' riod of 180 consecutive days. Ivo �, I \ 0_,//7 A --J r, , \id I November 05, 2018 Issued By: Date November 05,2018 Page 1 of 1 ib F A; PERMIT/PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION " 0MEEgt]. Ili a��►j�, Development Services Department,240 West Huntington Drive, Post Office Box 60021 °o,,, "" Arcadia, CA 91066-6021, (626) 574-5416, Fax (626)447-9173 City of Arcadia LICENSED CONTRACTOR'S DECLARATION WORKERS'COMPENSATION DECLARATION ❑ I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury that I am licensed under provisions of I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following: Chapter 9(commencing with Section 7000,of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code,and my license is in full force and effect. 0 I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' License Class License No. Exp. Date compensation, as provided for by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. Signature of Contractor OWNER-BUILDER DECLARATION 0 I have and will maintain workers'compensation insurance,as required by Section I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury that I am exempt from the Contractors 3700 of the Labor Code,for the performance of the work for which this permit License Law for the following reason(Section 7031.5,Business and Professions is issued.My workers'compensation insurance carrier and policy numbers are: Code.Any city or county which requires a permit to construct,alter,improve, Carrier demolish,or repair any structure,prior to its issuance,also required the applicant Policy Number for such permit to file a signed statement that he or she is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractors License Law(Chapter 9(commencing with Section (This section need not be completed if the permit is for one hundred dollars or less) 7000)of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code)or that he or she is • exempt there from and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued,I shall Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the workers' penaltyof not more than five hundred dollars($500)): compensation Laws of California,and agree that if I should become subject to the workers'compensation provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code,I shall CgI, as owner of the property, or my employees with wages as their sole forthwith comply with those provisions. compensation,will do the work,and the structure is not intended or offered fortel f t) S-4l (� g sale(Section 7044,Business and Professions Code:The Contractors LicenseSi nature Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, or who does such work himself or herself or through his or her own employees,provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for WARNING: Failure to secure Workers'Compensation coverage is unlawful, sale.If,however,the building or improvement is sold within one(1)year of and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one completion,the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he or she hundred thousand dollars($100,000),in addition to the cost of compensation, did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor Code, interest, and attorney's fees. I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Section 7044, Business and Professions .1e:The Contractors License Law does not apply to an owner of property CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY who builds or improves thereon,and who contracts for such projects with a I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury that there is a construction lending agency contractor(s)licensed pursuant to the Contractors License Law). for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Section 3097, Civil Code). ❑ I am exempt under Section 7044,Business and Professions Code,for this reason: „y Lender's Name it Date 1 A v. c 1'1' Signature r Lender's Address IM ORTANT: APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FOR A PERMIT SLMM I�C., OVQTIONS AND RES ICTIONS SET FORTH ON THIS APPLICATION AND THE FOLLOWING: 1. The City's approved plans and permit inspection card must remain on the job site for use by City inspection personnel. 2. Final inspection of the work authorized by this permit is required.A Certificate of Occupancy must be obtained prior to use and occupancy of new buildings and structures. 3. Per South Coast Air Quality Management District(AQMD)regulations,renovation and remodeling work that results in the removal,stripping,or altering of asbestos containing materials requires an asbestos survey and removal prior to disturbing the asbestos. Please contact AQMD at(909)396-2000 for further information. (Name �eY'''`9 L� • (Titleek PRINT NAME I certify that I have read this application and state that the above information is co rect and that I am the owner or duly authorized agent of the owner. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State Laws relating to buildin construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the City of Arcadia to enter pon the above-mentioned property for inspection purposes. nature Date /VJv• Cs—it-- - . 1 • ARc vz o >zvgRd9 %•� e'+="1711 CIlk < \\\�'Ee • 'a Po %Oh)!of City of Arcadia November 5, 2019 ARCADIA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Development 150 S. Third Avenue p Arcadia, CA 91006 Services Department RE: 758 Hampton Road— Parcel # 5769-010-002 Permit: B00-058-295 Owner: Zeyong Lu Jason Kruckeberg Assistant City Managcr/ To whom it may concern: Development Services Director —This letter serves to confirm that the above referenced property agent for the owner has cancelled the active permit and has requested a refund. Please issue a refund to the applicant of record. A new AUSD receipt is required to reactive the permit and continue with the proposed construction. If you have further questions regarding this matter, please contact me at your convenience. Thank you, Kenn h F Ids Building fficial 626-574-5420 :KF/cm 240 West Huntington Drive Post Office Box 60021 Arcadia,CA 91066-6021 (626) 574-5415 (626)447-3309 Fax www.ArcadiaCA.gov Certificate No.20121023-914 ARCADIA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 150 South Third Avenue, Arcadia,CA 91006 • (626) 821-8300 Ext. 6732 Certificate of Compliance for Payment of Developer Fees (Education Code§17620,et seq. &Government Code §65995,et seq.) Effective July 24,2017 Current rate in effect applies at the time of imposition of fees/payment. ProjectAddress/APN: 758 Hampton Rd. , Arcadia, CA 91006 Number of Units in Project: One Plan Check Number: 17-412 [ 1* [ Xi** [ 1** Exempt: [ 1 500 sq.ft.or less(residential addition/expansion/remodel) Residential Commercial/Industrial [ 1 Other: $3.20/sq.ft. $0.51/sq.ft. Area in Sq. Ft.: 4 486 Receipt Number: 3 3 0 4 3 5 Total Fee: $14, 355. 20 Check Number: 888009947 Owner's Name: Z e y o n g Lu Owner's Address: 895 Singing Wood Dr. , Arcadia, CA 91006 Phone Number: 626-400-9138 Email: zeyonglul8@hotmail .com Representative's Name&Contact Info(if appl.): *The above-described development has been determined to be exempt from the developer fees of Education Code§17620,et seq., and Government Code§65995,et seq.,and a Building Permit may be issued therefore. ** All fees due to the Arcadia Unified School District, under provision of Education Code §17620, et seq., and Government Code §65995, et seq., as a prerequisite to the issuance of a Building Permit by the Building Department of the City of Arcadia, City of Monrovia,City of Sierra Madre,City of Temple City,and County of Los Angeles,Department of Public Works have been received. Based on the information pr nted above,this Certificate of Compliance is hereby executed. Connie Chu Senior Administrative Asst_ 11/5/18 Signature of District Representative Name/Title Date of Issuance D The District charges a $100 fee to process reinstatement of the Developer Fee Certificate of Compliance resulting from an "insufficient funds"check in addition to a$35 fee for the returned check. Only cash or a Cashier's Check will be accepted as payment thereafter. • The District charges a$100 fee for any amendments to or cancellation of a Developer Fee Certificate of Compliance formerly issued on any type of development. > If 500 sq. ft.or less is the reason for exemption,any future additions,expansions,or remodels to the property that result in the past aggregate square footage to exceed the allotted 500 sq. ft. will be subject to fees at the current rate for the entire square footage of the development. D Owner/developer may request a refund of fees paid to the District within 12 months of payment only in the event the Building Permit expires or the project is canceled without commencement of construction in accordance with Education Code section 17624(all other requests for refunds must be made in accordance with the fee protest procedures set forth in Government Code §66020). All refunds will be reduced by a $100 administrative fee. The refund check will be issued in the name of the owner/developer and mailed to the address of payee. PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE§66020(d),OWNER/DEVELOPER HAS A PERIOD OF 90 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF ISSUANCE OF THIS CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE TO PROTEST THE IMPOSITION OF FEES Applicant confirms that he/she is authorized to sign on behalf of the owner/developer and that the information he/she provided to the District is true and accurate to th st of his/her knowledge. Signature of Applicant: Name: 2 er - L-!_ WHITE—City/County YELLOW—Fiscal Services PINK—Business Services GOLD—Applicant Certificate of Compliance(7-24-17) S S2 1ppio re' c,icvt5 5b8 8 ( b - (1 - 919 '1(I 1-10 Glvkaz 011- 400 7%. - 011 1 L9 cyc - 8 , 5,1 1(1 -49-- Tv-9 t3)c'( _r5 s a� )345 5,3 y,tiAa(1 a1y r51 `-t{I'A"'l _S ( -1c)P } ��1 .,a �� 'P'v°-) �1`� rro-v) as c_ [() d6_) x,40/27 To Arcadia City Building department Hi This is Zeyong Lu (Kenny), the owner of 758 hampton rd,Arcadia. My building permit was signed off on Nov,5th,2018 and the plan check number is 17412. I would like to file an extension for my building permit because I just came back from China and I am still looking for a contractor and Interior designer. Therefore I am writing this letter to extend the building permit for 6 months. Please contact me if you have any question. My phone number is 626-400-9138. Best, Zeyong Lu Owner of 758-hampton Rd. May 3rd 2019 eke •• clazI3 0/249 4o,� rarrfed u�>til .•I.` Development Services Department 240 West Huntington Drive,Post Office Box 60021 PERMIT NO. ---`,--- Arcadia,CA 91066-6021 B00-058-295 City of (626)574-5416,Fax(626)447-9173 Type:Arcadia Permit yp : SFNew PROJECT TRACT NO. LOT NO. APPLICATION DATE ISSUED BY PRINT DATE PERMIT STATUS 1;I s4 11/6/2017 EP 12:07 11/6/2017 Plan check ADDRESS NO. Dir.Prefix Street Name Street Suffix UNIT BLG ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. GEO CODE 758 Hampton Rd 5769-010-002 OWNER MAILING ADDRESS PHONE NO. (626)400-9138 Plan ChLu,Zeyong EMAIL EMAIL ADDRESS: APPLICANT MAILING ADDRESS A K Architects PHONE NO. (909)597-9988 EMAIL ADDRESS: CONTRACTOR/PROFESSIONAL MAILING ADDRESS PHONE NO. FAX NO. EMAIL ADDRESS: License No. Type: Expires. TENANT MAILING ADDRESS PHONE NO. FAX NO. DESCRIPTION SFR New 7 bed, 7.5 bath, foyer, great hall, family, living,dining,coat room, butler pantry,pantry, kitchen,work room, breakfast nook, theatre, laundry, storage, pwder rm, elevator, (2)2 car attached garage, Construction Type UOM N of Units Value Construction Type VOM 0 of Units Value Type V Wood Frame Good sq ft 7,842.00 $998,600.28 Patio sq ft 100 00 $2,218.00 Spnnkler System sq ft 7,842.00 $25,957.02 Patio sq ft 756.00 $16,768.08 Air Conditioning Res sq ft 7,842.00 $34,896.90 Wood frame garage sq ft 972.00 $33,077.16 Sprinkler System sq fl 972.00 $3,217.32 OCCUPANCY: Dwellings TOTAL VALUATION: $1,114,735.00 QTY UOM DESC AMT AMT PAID ACCT QTY UOM I)BSC AMT AMT PAID ACCT each Plan review 5,347.88 5,347.88 01-3103 100 Flat SWMF 2 1.00 88-3027 each Energy p/c fee 1,645.50 1.645 50 01-3103 PC Cal Green 534.79 534.79 01-3103 100 00 Cubic yarn Grading P.+C 850.00 850.00 01-3103 1.00 Flat Bldg Issue Auto 44.35 01-3104 each Bldgpermit 8,227.50 01-3104 evol D 1.00 each SF/MF Fire Pkc 280.00 280.00 01-3109 100.00 Cubic yan Grading fee 450.00 01-31 1 1 1.00 Flat Grading iss fee 44.35 01-3111 1.00 flat WELO Permit 44.35 01-3119 1.00 flat WELO Inspection 625.00 01-3119 1.00 flat WELO Plan Chk 1,700.00 1,700.00 01-3119 4,862.00 fq-ft Park Rec SFR 08 13,856.70 07-3509 SMTP Res 144.92 14-2207 1.00 DU sf condo town 1,983.00 156-3116 gm bldg std 45.00 714-2203 1.00 Flat SWMF Auto 6.25 88-3027 Total Fees: $35,830.59 Balance Due: $25,472.42 Paid Today: $10,358.17 This permit/plan review expires by time limitation and becomes null and void if the work authorized by the ecelp : permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of issuance or if the permit is not obtained within 180 days from 01-3103 8,378.17 the date of plan submittal.This permit expires and becomes null and void if any work authorized by this permit 01-3109 280.00 is suspended or abandoned for 180 consecutive days or if no progressive work has been verified by a City of 01-3119 1,700.00 Arcadia building inspector for a period of 180 consecutive days. CALLS FOR INSPECTION INSPECTORS'OFFICE HOURS Requests for inspection should be made at least Monday-Thursday Friday one(1)business day in advance of the inspection 7:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. 7:30 a.m.to 8:30 a.m. by telephone at(626)574-5416 for onsite work. 4:00 p.m.to 5:30 p.m. 4:00 p.m.to 4:30 p.m. (Closed on alternate Fridays) ,. Abc„„...°'�'�,. 104! 1 PERMIT/PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION �a�E�1�, Development Services Department,240 West Huntington Drive,Post Office Box 60021 Arcadia,CA 91066-6021, (626) 574-5416,Fax(626)447-9173 City of Arcadia LICENSED CONTRACTOR'S DECLARATION WORKERS'COMPENSATION DECLARATION ❑ I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury that I am licensed under provisions of I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following: Chapter 9(commencing with Section 7000,of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code,and my license is in full force and effect. ❑ I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' License Class License No. Exp. Date compensation, as provided for by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. Signature of Contractor OWNER-BUILDER DECLARATION ❑ I have and will maintain workers'compensation insurance,as required by Section ❑ I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury that I am exempt from the Contractors 3700 of the Labor Code,for the performance of the work for which this permit License Law for the following reason(Section 7031.5,Business and Professions is issued.My workers'compensation insurance carrier and policy numbers are: Code.Any city or county which requires a permit to construct,alter,improve, Carrier demolish,or repair any structure,prior to its issuance,also required the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he or she is licensed pursuant to the Policy Number provisions of the Contractors License Law(Chapter 9(commencing with Section (This section need not be completed if the permit is for one hundred dollars or less) 7000)of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code)or that he or she is exempt there from and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of ❑ I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued,I shall Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the workers' penalty of not more than five hundred dollars($500)): compensation Laws of California,and agree that if I should become subject to the workers'compensation provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code,I shall IDI, as owner of the property, or my employees with wages as their sole forthwith comply with those provisions. compensation,will do the work,and the structure is not intended or offered for sale(Section 7044,Business and Professions Code:The Contractors License Date Signature Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, or who does such work himself or herself or through his or her own employees,provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for WARNING: Failure to secure Workers'Compensation coverage is unlawful, sale. If,however,the building or improvement is sold within one(1)year of and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one completion,the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he or she hundred thousand dollars($100,000),in addition to the cost of compensation. did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor Code, interest, and attorney's fees. ❑I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project(Section 7044, Business and Professions Code:The Contractors License Law does not apply to an owner of property CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY who builds or improves thereon,and who contracts for such projects with a I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury that there is a construction lending agency contractor(s)licensed pursuant to the Contractors License Law). for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Section 3097, Civil Code). ❑ I am exempt under Seca(1l,0r ,`i14 ssions Code,for this reason: Lender's Name Date Signature Lender's Address IMPORTANT: APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FOR A PERMIT SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS SET FORTH ON THIS APPLICATION AND THE FOLLOWING: 1. The City's approved plans and permit inspection card must remain on the job site for use by City inspection personnel. 2. Final inspection of the work authorized by this permit is required.A Certificate of Occupancy must be obtained prior to use and occupancy of new buildings and structures. 3. Per South Coast Air Quality Management District(AQMD)regulations,renovation and remodeling work that results in the removal,stripping,or altering of asbestos containing materials requires an asbestos survey and removal prior to disturbing the asbestos.Please contact AQMD at(909)396-2000 for further information. fame 1-Oltitlti`f O U Title O TriCT 1-4A.G07_ PRINT NAME I certify that I have read this application and state that the above information is correct and that I am the owner or duly authorized agent of the owner. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State Laws relating to buildin construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the City of Arcadia to enter upon the above-mentioned property for inspection purposes. Snature ate 40V% 6714, -111 f ! AK s ARCHITECTS 1. 1 1,14 ARnx.n,.Inc JX Poohne Om+E vM nwrrA,�R AMM■ At3ig1 r It.IOMO®MOFC Cnro H3M WON NM VI 1 FI1, •••• x RAMS' SITE SECTION A•A r.Re 1 ,I I, .........__,. rR3 , cw. ..e • i1..44.: / .o... / •m, ,,1 , „. i 4444 . e _ • y�.K� e .//, ` ,44____44 - �_.,`- - 1.441.. _-.-.-.-. .- -_ _ . .. .. • N. girlie. IMP' • MINIM rM1 ' I 1 !/ /I - -• 1.1.1.1.— —•— — ----" --I • K I _ I ©© ? ° I . ..,..,.. I I. n� lit" I , • • I OAK PROTECTION MOMS.. , — i M ii i i fPROVRO 00,0 OAK RIM POOP WOO N \� `] I •:•:•:••:•:•:'.....••::::>. 7.■:� �_— ft,.4444,.,4444....ft T.O.!PROTOWOR=COWL MAT OE Pc ROM WRACKS Of MACRO loll El I ...doss RwORT o, ARic.,. • u� tisk i • l I MO,tMtIOH MOVD:MIY.rPE WEAPON MAO•AY, '�, !L, 4444 i...4‘' :+>j*i R IMAM■QUWHR TON AM HARTCN AO ': • r- 1• I a0 MR,Se PVT WOK MI 00,01.0 As SETBACK REQUIREMENT DIAGRAM r•WO 'T,3 .SCAll .,e I r�� i ro ems_ t A. '^ _44_44_•_1._1._44_ �,Aa« I ..�fLs I • � I vtI _ I RM . — .VX I A.,nRPI.a —ROT0330 MST 3OO4 Mu • �' -_4444_ ■:' 1 rsTaTwKr,e. VAI — �<u i1.01.0%0 00O.O ROOM Mu F Y Y.■ t - GENCICAL 11�MIGTecnOK brlS. I _._._.—.... 1^ �.1 '1u- !n A� ■■�. �.aec.Aea.LLEerxeKro I , {I ii t �Ej Y,.���M owNS CONSS ICTION.TE.roAMm MOCK oAn exawoN 1 e. _1 j■ ■■ Y °1Y M. - - U I •4444.. -. oomhat 4444 e'''', 0s 'Aorecnve mlc,re eliwLo x _OWING ONCE p 5�R■�PiY■ - .. }T i t 4444 !Y ■ii Y■ , rrrAu® PECESann*MO CARE C t i , ,, ■ ..q ■i' ■ ; �■1 IRM-Nr �■ ' 9 . TAKEN TO^V O DANA.TO 0■i■IC QIaEtLOMP1:1lA _.;_ __.JRR ■ ,,__■L- I.a Til CM cANTn.ND ROOT SYSTd a p 4444 ILK.�-11114� �nu $. O ��` , (10731.POEM/2 PIOUS r ■� �• I' xwro CONSTRICTOR ERAO,ro ■4444. I MOO 0.10b10.15 '? I ��_ ��'■Zi N_a■LIIIN maw,mint YU:L7C i ■ I J :'. 4 1 ^`• AOC 704330004 00 TOT 015RRe 00 i RM MOPODIAO:?MN . . . _— — ,.R.R. ,o R.. c,iAroE TK MOOSE SPACE WWI i R.(d,r r -be TREE 0 1SLp!LOU HMO TOOLS I 1:.... ROSH MOROro Mla3o Ruse.00 d 44 44,..,4 q ,o. •.,a �..,.o. • 1441 • no.eR SAN.+'<••+•'„'^l HOT TURNS. R Room COOK]GlOM Mm•KCP Project: dd APO 11M""s u"`""O' CUSTOM HOME .,e e HOT STOCKPILE SOIL OR OTPER MATERIALS INTION TOE MIRNe 758 HAMPTON ROAD N® AREA.Mow NOT RAIN CIEMCALS ARCADIA,CA 91006 CA RIES P r UNDER TINGE COA SITE PIAN r c.MYOnn.PROVIDE occASIONAL W/SETBACK DIAGRAM OEt MATvuro A5 NECESSARY To &SITE SECTION F ® RSR^TREES HEALTHY VOL M NEM 1.s.,Cti STSTEH M MSTM.LEO •/... sb o.ti.4N .PIS >�A 0.01 LEGENDS AND AVERAGE GRADE w.( 4 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN r or 2 'ISII" g CALCULATIONS 1 6* I • AK I 1 ARCHITECTS I co - 4 I • _ '�' 0 m O' ]P L I O ID ��n... fI ■ lr a . — 0 : - _....ID Ci 1 I n m✓C 0 y WM _. um� �� lY � 1 ince i �I O �Io_ 1 I ,1` IO R Inject�^m bt.,,tre I �.� P.a�iRF I TO, I I I j E 1E;c9'—tom , 10.7 �L3 'J La ��� ---- 1‘› Gi�w Ll1ML I �`�►I�4.y© I n�"! if/io.all "M r.7A/ . pCid 1 `,1 d Vt.mu prig:�II�LIS a __ Y_:� S 17o/�/.dg R_—_. 1 /fi.l ' 144 t li _.__._ I INV" _.- -- ---�' ffiu�.�'/1 {� aIII i/ nra 1 _Jam 23 p P ' ..4111111.11 I r-Ill. 1:1 4 h -� j ® I = ,I®° mei. :I a c•~ ''I g iii -In _I�_a ®Q '4 I. 'L 1 -141 Gi � �3oala m41�ai�l�°,� aPa .�f � ��_�� �+' J ec¢ r__. _..__ lfrf wm , a � I 111 ; co mmIDD7L7� II _ • Sll L.f��'m� .ARj Zs 0 I t~. _.. .. _._.._._ __._._._.__'01I I' I 1 Q i -- T, 1 1 lo, ril cessE . oast O B p I »Jy I 1 10 l9 O I a �� ° J E a;IL -- Ji a L aw ms E a "• I } �.: Project: '�>e1 L. CUSTOM HOME I 1 1 758 HAMPTON ROAD ARCADIA•CA 91006 ry RRST BOOR PLAN 4 4 4 t FIRST FLOOR PLAN ""` 1 =. A•1.02 ii • •• • PJ(e 11 ARCHITECTS 1 1 j w •.. CG;mbM.G AInn ^-..^-•nw nal 11 II 9 !tb4 i E ► r i® Kalif®= , •az %.,„"trici 6 Ars.•f z 7: )9' 7Pa x '74.9I. as i= II ��qyE i � a L.�� II m .1_ �I as� II EL' y _ �2:1a I na�u -- o a o- I'll rat6 nI —c .m II a c lei G3 In .,,•, WW1-11 -I rte,_ R aii aaS lid ❑ & I ',0 no •..mo.wm mag i�F� '19 I __ IVPI �I E riami l l�_ r ao l�J��Fiji, .ISCATotollmm1 ; 0 ,A m ® - ° , _ rowj g a 1 t iri 11 am.<i ma — Aill x I, Ai Iti i 1 .6. 1 Ih. t �—' ._ •ny. ._ r,. ... I Project: f III CUSTOM HOME 755 HAMPTON ROAD SEE 6603 FOR ARCADIA,CA 91006 1 NOTES/ NED SECOND BOOR PUN 4 4 /,� 6 KOTJOTFS Z F3" /LEGENDS ��-� > 77,......... P 2 SECOND FLOOR PLAN M" wi 1citt, A•1.03 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW BOARD FINDINGS AND ACTION A. ASSOCIATION NAME: 12hNc1+0 Sh-.,r-A 414 rA B. PROJECT ADDRESS: �7' 9 F�vim.. ro►� C. PROPERTY OWNER: 34-EN- y L ADDRESS (IF DIFFERENT): D. FINDINGS (only check those that apply, and provide a written explanation for each): 1. The proposed construction materials ARE ❑, ARE NOT❑ compatible with the existing materials, because 2. The proposed materials WILL ❑, WILL NOT❑ have a significant adverse impact on the overall appearance of the property, because 3. The proposed project IS ❑, IS NOT❑significantly visible from the adjoining public rights of way, because 4. The proposed project IS ❑, IS NOT❑ significantly visible from the adjoining properties because 5. The elements of the structure's design ARE ❑, ARE NOT 0 consistent with the existing building's design, because 6. The proposed project IS ❑, IS NOT ❑ in proportion to other improvements on the subject site or to improvements on other properties in the neighborhood, because 7. The location of the proposed project WILL ❑, WILL NOT ❑ be detrimental to the use and enjoyment and value of adjacent property and neighborhood, because 8. The proposed project's setbacks DO ❑, DO NOT❑ provide for adequate separation between improvements on the same or adjoining properties, because 9. OTHER FINDINGS: (over) . * Arbor Care Inc. Arboricultural Consulting & Plant Health Care info@ArborCareInc.net 626-737-4007 DATE: March 16, 2018 TO: City of Arcadia Planning Division 240 W. Huntington Drive, P.O. Box 60021 Arcadia, CA 91007 FROM: Michael Crane Arbor Care, Inc. SUBJECT: 758 Hampton R.—Addendum to Protected Tree Report Preservation of an olive tree—design analysis and recommendations Refer to original Protected Tree Report dated February 2017. Due to their wide use as a landscape specimen tree,olives trees (Olea spp.) have been restricted from the category of fruit trees and therefore moved off of the list of exception trees,which qualifies fruit trees as being non-protected. Olive trees are Protected according to this slight amendment to the tree ordinance. One olive tree exists on the property and the tree was not included in the original Protected Tree Report; however,my analysis of the design with the consideration of the great tolerance of olive trees to root pruning,I determine that the tree can be reliably preserved in place and the current design accommodates the tree appropriately. The subject tree is mature and in good heath and structural condition. It is located near the east property line in the side yard area. The existing home's foundation is located within five feet of the trunk and the proposed home's foundation will have a similar setback,but the assumed overexcavation to construct the building pad may come within a foot of the trunk. This would be a severe encroachment on most all broadleaf trees but olives are extremely tolerant of root pruning so the encroachment will be tolerable. The current plans have a planter area designed on center of the tree and this design will accommodate the tree very well. No changes to the design are required and the protective fence that will be set for the adjacent pine tree (Tree#4) can easily be extended to incorporate the olive. One of the primary reasons that olives are used in landscapes,particularly redesigned ones,is their tolerance of root pruning. Mature olives are commonly dug from orchards with a rootball that is just a foot or several inches from the exposed buttress area. This greatly reduces the overall installation cost and allows for large mature trees to be planted in a new design at a relatively low cost. Since the subject tree will not be encroached on one side and not brought through the rigors of a typical transplanting it is very likely that the tree will be unaffected by the construction. Nevertheless,I plan to monitor of throughout the project. I have attached a photo of the tree along with the section of the site plan than includes it. Please email me with any questions or concerns. Sincerely, too. C144, • J _ r �Yn ivar Awa.���' Michael Crane r �J.� ��,� L � w . c', e ` `4; hr-r: ht 4: {l. G �+ k o f 14 : op ' '4, , . I 's,� �• ' i„ '\, 1t � \ Or it;,,C/ (,f‘; ;; ,r, f `'1 141&0 lit • I ) r "�/), •I t • a '„ 4 ,`` di r } y� 0'It � admill ii, Olive N ,, ' •lithart-,.. tit ... Tree off .. • I., 15 ABOVE: Looking north at the olive tree from the east side yard area. BELOW: The tree can reliably be incorporated into the planter that is part of the current design. ---_--, - , /,• r•rr _EP�J P1NE 1E ALEPPO PIKE • _ t r •----- -- -- - - 1 ---- - - - - - - - - - • rj' ! Olive z<• • ILILBERg r. ç.. 1. Tree ' -. I Vii' • ' I gill • : :• - . ,.‘/ 745 75 II 1 - g °�• N The American Society of Consulimg •Arborists DEPARTMENT OF PESTICIDE REGULATION LICENSING/CERTIFICATION PROGRAM U e I `M It 80dpir PCA ft.i (y in recognition ofMfrllinens of the reyu rernenrr for , �: Registered Consulting Arhrnr.lr Atoms AGRICULTURAL PEST CONTROL ADVISER LICENSE ami 1;¢ ra4 ry„�,nLicense #: 75893 EXPIRES: 12/31/2016 Categories ABCDEFG ISSUED 01/01/2015 g a „ Michael Crane, RCA #440 MICHAEL J CRANE I; cx, E PO BOX 51122 W I PASADENA CA 91 115 vRegistered Membership c/) L January IR.2006 II El 11t,1 1 itgilli .E ,Fi,1. ' twfilkil , - � _sThis License must be shown to any representative of the Director or Commissioner upon rawest Fa. Ta 2 2 in a. CA f_, rr 1 I 3hnternationa[ *octet', of Arboriculture INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ARBORICULTURE Tree 1:ioI azzessmcllt 0:Notification V) BOARD CI'RTI I'IED MASTER ARBORIST— i.,— RBORIST"i-.a Q -. Michael J.Crane Z^ Michael J. Crane "°°' 5e„ " bCe � �a�' 'e`g SonMy of AtboralMaa.tM above named a hereby'recokyn en as SA Tree Rrsi Assessment OuahM1M a) Hpang successfully complete/the rcquirculenrs et k'the Arborist Certification [I] Board of the International Soccer\.0 Arboriculture, F�L7 thy above named is hereby recognized as an ISA Ih,.inl Certified •r Ark,ri t' • .r U L�� r. b.cw. ►.a�.a.r.a.o-«w 7 O . 0 wEaW 6v naMa.200/ 4611.2018 ry hterwr 1.301)__ DaeeBr 11.10!(1 < . 4 . •.._..... 1 f k Protected Tree Report: Survey,Encroachment and Protection Plan 758 Hampton Rd.,Arcadia,91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440.February 2017 CERTIFICATION OF PERFORMANCE I, Michael Crane, certify that: • I have personally inspected the tree(s) and the property referred to in this report and have stated my findings accurately. • I have no current or prospective interest in the vegetation or the property that is the subject of this report and have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved. • The analysis, opinions, and conclusions stated herein are my own and are based on current scientific procedures and facts. • My analysis, opinions, and conclusions were developed and this report has been prepared according to commonly accepted arboricultural practices. • No one provided significant professional assistance to me, except as indicated within the report. • My compensation is not contingent upon the reporting of a predetermined conclusion that favors the cause of the client or any other party not upon the results of the assessment,the attainment of stipulated results, or the occurrence of any subsequent events. I further certify that I am a member in good standing of the American Society of Consulting Arborists and the International Society of Arboriculture. I have been involved in the field of Horticulture in a full-time capacity for a period of more than 25 years. Signed: Registered Consulting Arborist #440; American Society of Consulting Arborist Board Certified Master Arborist #WE 6643B; International Society of Arboriculture Licensed California Agricultural Pest Control Adviser#AA08269 February 10, 2017 EIIT Date: 26 z 1 Y 1 r.' .-" . • - 1 . i.._. t.- .s.lastp3antakf 110.10 aalla i . . . ..1 i. Z . -1 i . sf tpto Atodaul fftplo futupotb isokupiou otp tg poprof"limo pm alum ,--c- '... -1,: laPalual Pap Mow incy eta (in)auaz twitoalud pass e jo maw"!Kam, f ' le! ..J.L-... I- • . -• .,c_j„k- - aq;.4 fliff!un risaf al Mammal=fa 1!,aia,,Pa al acal Infaaa mit f " . •• 'L.° '7r.' -,...L -,3, ... . ,-- ---- _ ....--*-- ------ • t ' '' ;---: ''-i___ iff.ru span qoa?01 palTal a!zaalina 191 Pa lard°gra Fir---c / I-1 >I( ' ---?,,-- ..! sa 3 tr.. 1-i..-, ,..r....7.,--.-..-...:-,, V•I°. , i-1 gut' alalmal awaYalaJaf sal 01 gnaw csaqufluf awy iaciaryfancuji,frea ,, -aaftlfa.ahlaaa alf Paws faaarna!saWas Sant V:Wad laaallafalP ,.,,„ 1 $ - . . , 7%1 . l 1.? "` " 1 laap 01 aull ma a tif wimp QM=la amwN pariatafpalla maw!" VI I 1 ' (i 91,„ : . .v i,:.;.. --.7 . ....,.., \-_ ,,,,.dh .fi:i t 1 41.00 Qt'so 4 4. .. rt 2 . , -;. - -1.----,r -",-; ----..trr7.7,- ----1 -_-_-F ,p,,,„i..„,„,.,„4..9 itpaigisdni egkenb.91iffhlop Sal Swam -.. ...._, r-ffunrionvqwq;snuf,8 xfolara-tfou 2totue oraft-se out a mounik; , r^f•;< ,.-7 ad k.L. tf.' 1;7,--.1 , ,c-4%C I (iki) I PJL iC:) . . ' . .tv.S:17-.. 1-11.$1,0 01114'4.. , ',C.' s., " : .... Pae OF0 i^!Mo 111WRIoal JOU Tall01441afaama axe 0E4 P51EIEI?Ed ,t . ki I 4\ , i.a kt a:L V1.14S ‘St: •-•Z.: ."-.'-'1-",n-el ; I . . . - , 9 . 9.. 1$1,tiptcHest ErtEll , 1 .•"' l• .._. • I.4 f^", .."- .0.-e. -: I 1.1 3.1.0N SASMOHIPI ' IA i 1 o'f-i,' u r .4 . \ ( i- .49V!,,s• 4. 44;479 • if•A.IticaE) lo/4 ,, ,' • it:ak, _ . I I \ R 4+24t, ss . . c. , r . ..1 . . -t r, -- . -' im* tv _ ....._ ..... -...••••• -k-S_... , P-.- r , )' %sf.:2 \ -7,/.„.• ' - • • i„.- ''''',...,,_ I- Jac:• , , is ,p.1.,,N.:. : '' , , ..-7,4_,•'''' - . .- . -L.', i ,ce era 4, /4 13 ! jai v.,,-.L4.-"r */7-7.--61 tiii, . t ., :t ,4 / ,-);.,4,....„.: ,,•‘...,0,041_ , q Et Ft 1 1 " Ir,11 _ ' , 1 A.,. • .4..I7irr‘ . Et A.. ,- .__.(„1 _7.1,...,1_I -t ti".,,, f:. • 4,,r, _.. ropo, I z . . ____ 1 .....\_, „... ,-.--:,-,-. , ,._. ).• I-, -7 `-i-E,-.:-Irt 1 1.- r • -,:,:- ::-•.H. , 7 a / xl I q (Ea •4 " ' 11 I • - ' I 1 I , ....;.-t,-- 6, , ifteLta•Cli ea I / I .• , 4 1 - .. - - ' ' -.V-I tV ' .--.... ,:ct 1,...- ._,, ' 9 ••.1 •••1 t; I i L, i torollc ei 1.5iii; I P ,i , . . .,.. ,. . .) t f .1 3 11, :::,11 . r I I \Ara.liii i I 1 Z EZE.rai I \‘"'II I I 1 . -, t, ,...; . •- ; tTI n h E iv c . „ oz =-602-Al 11. tcfr't ll I, • --- • ; • ••• - --ix t ,, . 1 ,...,}1, •., . ,c,.-qoz) • , 1 f -,, 1 t-•01 y- •-- • -., ti I 1,' 11. i 44 'I if / t I- • ,' • ., .... . ‘; .,.: . . • .- , 1 .,./1 1 ..., _ ,, t,e2 i. Th•N\ r ,c,,,...,..r. , ,,,g, . -- JIL.--4*q,...-1.-\....1c.a,2' -1-4:4. •C-- ... -- '- -- ---•""r-.a.;-----,.-•=7:" •-:` •- '- h I' •• I' ' -r-a-ra 1 • *tic- -....-. 1;37....---x-a te,. 7„5".revfX.1 r. ,.... -'--... ;?;v,) ,,- ;.. _,,,,. ._ . I 'ir i•->:, ;«I I- - ,1 A ''egt, 1 IT . 7 • • • , . .., .... ....: ,., ,...;.....,..„. ,.,,_,_ r., ‘ ..... ,•, 1 12. , I I I I - •• ..;•,f1-.,(20-29,.,1 i c- A---ti ; lizer TIM I ,I •-0---N i 1., \ -`.7'''',`;`,'4 - 14 11304 --; fe ;:ct I ucot)i (Etau.3 (LEITIYI :EC-E' PL''' : • f • I ".‘‘41 •• 111 I I -E--„. - t• Fi, It ri _ 0 A 4 . A , A ' - • , 1 :; ;" :.: At ,•, ....„,_. -• Jet: Mon I- ti 1 I 14 • , I •::4 ,,, Ili if (2.-ir.L, \ ,. . . . \0 8. ill i i t'r •f i 11---,tra 1,1s' _. (i•tez,l 1-• I ` V, ."••• - ' i •• I .•:•; %,f Ks apc) IT I ' : I. ttrItti::,- is • Osci{1.1..., tit .. . ;% ' • . , ... . • , .....,‘,,,,! , .... ,..... ..... i',trims? .. Az' -,--,.. c ; - r,, - -• . • ...1,,,,,t:i. ; I! - -. beet ! ill .0"Ertlal I 4 I illebb-ig„Ittir51 ..2 • „.h.,,„ ',"1.1 IlEit' , 04• - E -I-1 ( . . . ..,...! (u...) , II ; -..r, i ! - .•\•', .. , , (iriCt Cs*EV 9;•, , , _ , "\-41 - • • 1 :!.GlElp I 4 . ...-‘ . "• 4Z r• i • 1 •1 11.-4'-I 4 t• 1; -.4 '14.7 . 1I941.Zi4;1••‘ "..., --• r- . , ••4 \ I .0341 1 \ St \\it CS' ; r. ..- 6 • _ i (911aor _ _s 1.. • 1../* 1 ili ,E*MA D‘c, ••• • • 290.."..,, ;;‘,n.49' R A it• rtit a•tEntl i r `,4,,,t1(...1:4i . ..„,„....--1 ,,,,c4.-7 i"-- •.. ' , (<,s: . ,,,,,..,T,_ or.r.,,,, 1_, il, ... _r% , , ,r„...:- • i+II'/ . _, .a ,,•fl,• I "4°43 (ill, '1 I I i'C'4ei .„‘t , 1,1, 1"rui lot r,• i , •--ie.I.r,9- le.a7/9.all.' .." ./60•46-7 01 V•.•1 . .,,,,,t . 'It,I '1/4'4E5110 t C,I:trzcl 4071 IECTall • ..st./(9/8 fon ts-;4.1.;;;E4? _ , ti,Lstri I ii,,_ itIV.Clit„ 6•° 44 -"-f•1,a,_ • , ., . ' 1,://,1 eisap.inil ) I \ .,..xl..... 1 , kit I \ ,r_t:s.n.a- 1- i--......_E_I_ __ _ iv' t; i"90,..c9;\ 1.2_,2913,7.-.E-C 9 -- -._--_-r.:E0,8%74t-',;-titCtai-v,kg„, ..\ .: • 4133 riiii," _/,1 . .„,.. ....., -- - ----Z. ' -• / .., • II i •sa•E !';‘ . i ‘,5.• ' . II ' ' • _ . • an 0-.0,4-1 { Protected Tree Report: Tree Survey, Encroachment, Protection and Mitigation 758 Hampton Road Arcadia, CA 91006 Prepared For: Mr. Tony Tang (626) 353-8686 chaoyintang@yahoo.com.tw Prepared By: Michael Crane Arbor Care, Inc. P.O. Box 51122 Pasadena, CA 91115 Tel: (626) 737-4007 Fax: (626) 737-4007 Email: info@arborcareinc.net February 2017 17. 3 Table of Contents Summary of Data 1 Background and Purpose of Report 1 Project Location, Description&Tree Ordinance 2 Observations&Analysis 5 Tree Characteristics& Health Matrix 8 Construction Impact Matrix 10 Findings 12 Further Recommendations. . 12 Appendix A- Photos 14 Appendix B - Protected Tree Construction Impact Guidelines 19 Author's Certifications 25 Certification of Performance 26 Topographical Conceptual Site Plan Pocket at back • E Protected Tree Report: Survey,Encroachment and Protection Plan 758 Hampton Rd.,Arcadia,91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440.February 2017 SUMMARY OF DATA Total number of healthy Protected Trees on property including street trees located in the adjacent public right-of-way area 11 Total number of off-site Protected Oak and Sycamore Trees with canopies (driplines) encroaching onto the property 1 Total number of diseased/hazardous Protected Trees on site proposed for removal (Tree#5) 1 Total number of healthy Protected Trees to be preserved 10 Total number of healthy Protected Trees to be removed 2 Total number of Protected Trees that will be preserved,which will be impacted by construction within dripline (encroached) 10 Total number of Protected Trees with no dripline encroachments 0 Total number of proposed mitigation trees to be planted on site 2 BACKGROUND & PURPOSE I was retained by the Project Designer and Manager, Mr. Tony Tang, Inc. to be the consulting arborist for the planned redevelopment of the property located at 758 Hampton Rd. There are Protected Trees located on the property, and encroaching over the property from off-site. The proposed construction may impact these trees and this report will serve to both notify the City of Arcadia Planning Division of the extent of the potential impacts as well as to inform the builder of the proper protection measures which must be taken in order to preserve the trees. As part of my preparation for this report I made a site visit to the property on January 31, 2017. I met with Mr. Tang at that time to view and discuss the proposed construction plans as they relate to the preservation of the Protected Trees. I was given a conceptual site plan for my analysis. 1 c Protected Tree Report: Survey.Encroachment and Protection Plan 758 Hampton Rd.,Arcadia,91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440.February 2017 PROJECT LOCATION, DESCRIPTION & TREE ORDINANCE �j W Orange Grove Ave r E Orange Grove Ave ab I f O Orb 'ID, .::I 11 a C_ 3 V w m z W Foothill Blvd W Foothill Blvd N W Colorado Blvd 758 Hampton Road is easily accessed from N. Baldwin Ave., three blocks north of W. Foothill Blvd. The property is one half block west of N. Baldwin. Above map courtesy of Apple Maps. The property consists of a one story single-family residence that appears to be in fair condition. The home will be demolished and the property redeveloped into a two story single family home. The landscape is maintained and the woody plants and trees are in fair to good condition. The Protected Trees range in condition from poor to good. The landscape will be renovated and most of the Protected Trees will be incorporated into the new design. 2 Protected Tree Report: Survey,Encroachment and Protection Plan ` 758 Hampton Rd.,Arcadia,91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440.February 2017 11' 440110****14010100 , , 2. a ,i ,_ .• . . . 3 s .. , ,:......... 4 , l . , 12 1J3 ru , 1 i 11 4 10 w1w I ; Si.. +� .''.1 '1.L.!4I ''. ___6 . ` ..... , �oip 7 A jilli - s-: _•,.... 4 -. .,.. „. , .., 3, , ‘ . ,, if' 1 ... . . ,r , 7 . ,... _ ' , This aerial view (courtesy of Apple Maps) has been illustrated to show the approximate boundary lines (orange). The locations of the Protected Trees are numbered in yellow. 3 Protected Tree Report: Survey,Encroachment and Protection Plan 758 Hampton Rd.,Arcadia,91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440.February 2017 City of Arcadia Tree Ordinance Oaks, Sycamore, and many other tree species are Protected under the various tree ordinances. Here is a summary of the tree protection laws. On January 21, 1992 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1962 recognizing oak trees as significant aesthetic and ecological resources and establishing criteria for the preservation of oak frees. The regulations(Chapter 7 of the Arcadia Municipal Code)provide that the following oak trees shall not be removed,relocated,damaged,or have their protected zones encroached upon unless an Oak Tree Permit is granted: • Engelmann Oaks(Quercus engelmanni:) or Coast Live Oak,California Live Oak(Quercus agrifolia) which have a trunk diameter larger than four(4)inches measured at a point four and one half(4'A)feet above the crown root,or,two(2)or more trunks measuring three(3)inches each or greater in diameter, measured at a point four and one half(4'/z)feet above the crown root. • Any other living oak tree with a trunk diameter larger than twelve(12)inches measured at a point four and one half(4 %z)feet above the crown root,or,two(2)or more trunks measuring ten(10)inches each or greater in diameter measured at a point four and one half(4'/m)feet above the crown root. On March 3,2015,the City Council adopted Ordinance No.2323 amending the code to add Sycamore trees to the list of City's Tree Preservation Regulations. The protected trees are Oak and Sycamore trees. Protected Sycamore trees are defined as: • Plantanus racemosa(Sycamore)with a trunk diameter larger than six(6)inches measured at a point four and one-half(4'/,)feet above the root crown,or two(2)or more trunks measuring four(4)inches each or greater in diameter,measured at a point four and one-half(41/2)feet above the root crown. On August 2,2016,The City Council adopted Ordinance No.2338 to add additional protected trees and unprotected trees to the City's tree preservation regulations. In September,the City began protecting mature trees that are located within a required front,side,street-side,or rear yard setback area that are either larger than 12 inches in diameter or larger than 10 inches in diameter if there are multiple trunks. Below is a list of the unprotected trees: 1. Fruit frees 2. Fraxinus uhdei(Shame]Ash) 3. Ficuses—Exception: Ficus macrophylla(Moreton Bay Fig) 4.Eucalyptus 5.Ailanthus altissima(Tree of Heaven) 6.Arecaceae(Palm Tree) 7. Schinus terebinthifolius(Brazilian Pepper) 8.Ceratonia siliqua(Carob) 9. Betula pendula(European White Birch) 10.Grevillea robusta(Silk Oak) 11.Morus(Mulberry) 12.Acer saccharinum(Silver Maple) 13. Cupressus sempervirens(Italian cypress) 14. Populus Fremontii(Western Cottonwood) 15.Alnus rhombifolia(White Alder) 16.Populus trichocarpa(Black Cottonwood) 17.Populus `Highland'hybrid 18. Salix lasiolepis(Arroyo Willow) 19.Liquidambars(Sweet Gum) 4 Protected Tree Report: Survey,Encroachment and Protection Plan • 758 Hampton Rd.,Arcadia,91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440.February 2017 FIELD OBSERVATIONS & DESIGN ANALYSIS Refer to Site Plan located in pocket at back of this report, Tree Characteristics and Health Matrix on page 8, Construction Impacts Matrix on page 10 and Photos in Appendix A, page 14. Analysis regarding rootzone impacts are based on the type of impact, e.g, soil compaction, grading, and excavation; as well as the distance from the trunk that the impacts will occur. It is commonly accepted among professional arborists that a distance equal to three times a trunks diameter contains the structural roots responsible for keeping the tree upright. This critical rootzone area is defined as the root plate. Beyond the root plate the roots typically taper off into smaller, less significant sizes. These smaller roots are usually two inches in diameter or smaller and make up the rootmass responsible for water and nutrient uptake. Although roots of these sizes can be cut without significantly impacting health and stability it is advised that no more than 30 percent of the rootmass within the dripline is severed. The bulk of the rootmass is located within the top three feet of soil and root growth slows or halts when soil bulk density exceeds 1.60 g/cm3 for most soils. More information regarding rootzone impacts is provided in the Excavation and Root Pruning section of the Construction Impact Guidelines, Appendix B. Tree #1 —26" Coast Live Oak: The tree is located off-site on the property to the east. It is located in the public right-of-way setback and the trunk is approximately three feet from the east property line. It is assumed that the existing garden wall located on the property line will remain. No construction related encroachments will occur. Typical landscape renovations will encroach. No pruning of the live crown is required to complete the project. Tree#2—24" Chinese Elm: This tree is located in the front yard. No construction related encroachments will occur. Typical landscape renovations will encroach. No pruning of the live crown is required to complete the project. Tree #3 — 18" Aleppo Pine: This tree is located within a couple feet of the east property line in the front yard. It is assumed that the existing garden wall located on the property line will remain. No construction related encroachments will occur. Typical landscape renovations will encroach. No pruning of the live crown is required to complete the project. Tree #4— 19" Aleppo Pine: This tree is located in the front yard, within three feet of the east property line. The foundation for the new house will be built 17 feet from the trunk on its south side. The assumed five foot overexcavation will come as close as 12 feet and all excavation will be done in the footprint of the existing home. It is assumed that the existing garden wall located on the property line will remain. No pruning of the live crown is required to complete the project. Tree #5— 13" Carrotwood: This tree is located in the area that will become a side yard. The foundation for the home will be built within a foot from the trunk and the required 5 ° Protected Tree Report: Survey,Encroachment and Protection Plan 758 Hampton Rd.,Arcadia,91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440.February 2017 overexcavation will occur where the tree is located. The tree will be removed. The Tree is in poor structural condition with several large wounds caused by large branch failures. Regardless of the construction impacts, this tree is not a good candidate for preservation. Tree#6— 14" Carrotwood: This tree is located in the back yard. The foundation for the new house will be built 16 feet from the trunk on its south side. The assumed five foot overexcavation will come as close as 11 feet. No pruning of the live crown is required to complete the project. Tree#7—10" Victorian Box: This tree is located in the southwest corner of the back yard, within a foot of the south property line. It is assumed that the existing concrete block wall located on this property line will remain. No construction related encroachments will occur. Typical landscape renovations will encroach. No pruning of the live crown is required to complete the project. Tree #8— 13" Victorian Box: This tree is located in the southwest corner of the back yard, within a foot of the south and west property lines. It is assumed that the existing concrete block wall located on these property lines will remain. No construction related encroachments will occur. Typical landscape renovations will encroach. No pruning of the live crown is required to complete the project. Tree#9—10" Victorian Box: This tree is located in the southwest corner of the back yard, within two feet of the west property line. It is assumed that the existing concrete block wall located on this property line will remain. No construction related encroachments will occur. The foundation for the home will be built 20 feet from the trunk and the assumed five-foot overexcavation will come within 15 feet,just outside the dripline. Typical landscape renovations will encroach. No pruning of the live crown is required to complete the project. Tree#10—14" Victorian Box: This tree is located in the back yard, two feet from the west property line. The foundation for the new house will be built 13 feet from the trunk on its south side. The assumed five foot overexcavation will come as close as 8 feet. It is assumed that the existing concrete block wall located on this property line will remain. Typical landscape renovations will encroach. Some minor crown raising and reduction type pruning will be required to accommodate the roofline and exterior walls. Tree #11 — 12" Carrotwood: This tree is located in the back yard, seven feet from the west property line. The foundation for the new house will be built 7 feet from the trunk on its south side. An assumed five foot overexcavation will come as close as 2 feet, which may impact the tree's stability. If the overexcavation is not reduced by the soil engineer to three feet or less, than the foundation shall be constructed with a deeper footing to allow for a further distance from the 6 Protected Tree Report: Survey,Encroachment and Protection Plan 758 Hampton Rd.,Arcadia,91006 • Michael Crane,RCA#440.February 2017 trunk. Typical landscape renovations will encroach. Some minor crown raising and reduction type pruning will be required to accommodate the roofline and exterior walls. Tree#12— 13" Chinese Elm: This tree is located in the an area that will become the side yard. The foundation for the home will be built within two feet of the trunk, and overexcavation will occur where the tree is located. It will be removed. It has structural defects that prevent it from being a candidate for relocation, and the best mitigation is replacing it with a quality nursery- grown specimen. Tree#13—15" Chinese Elm: This tree is located in the an area that will become the side yard. The foundation for the home will be built within two feet of the trunk, and overexcavation will occur where the tree is located. It will be removed. It has structural defects that prevent it from being a candidate for relocation, and the best mitigation is replacing it with a quality nursery- grown specimen. 7 Protected Tree Report: Survey,Encroachment and Protection Plan 758 Hampton Rd.,Arcadia,91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440.February 2017 This chart includes all Protected Trees that are either located or encroaching on the property. It provides physical data collected from field observations. The trees have been surveyed and numbers correspond to the Site Plan included in this report. Tree numbers with an"os" indicate that the specimen is located off-site and a portion of the canopy extends over the subject property. Trunk diameters with an asterisk(*) indicate that the tree is a multi-trunked specimen and the measurement is for the largest leader or trunk. TREE CHARACTERISTICS & HEALTH MATRIX r" k i " nmERISTEr`' HEALTH CROWN AGF., . .. milik, FORM T " - '- CLASS CLASS DENSITY W t7 Q H U x O W W .. x U F� z A ci) W U U G� 2 w F- ren [ R5 F, Q 2 C7 Q r4 4 c7 p4 as � a! W A a; N SPECIES Q W w W w w Q 7 a: g O w O A O O g Z Au W 1 a. 0 4 g „.7., ua O L c„ O O ua A a y Q O ra Q >, a , 0 a O c7 a. A W X O ] W z W Q z O Cl) g 0 f:4 P4 > u' QCf) A O CA OCA 3 w Q < A 0 los Quercus agrifolia 26 45 50 X X X X X X X 2 Ulmus parvifolia 24 40 40 X X X X X X X 3 Pinus halepensis 18 50 30 X X X X X X _ X 4 Pinus halepensis 19 50 30 X X X X X X X 5 Cupaniopsis anacardioides 13 25 20 X X X X X X X X X 6 Cupaniopsis anacardioides 14 30 20 X X X X X X X 7 Pittosporum undulatum 10* 35 20 X X X X X X X X 8 w tv ::: o `p OO TREE NUMBER C [ (2 b b 'v, V o CA H C17 ° ° Fi m o '- ^ R x — TRUNK DIAMETER "' * �' � * `'' (INCHES) L.,, ,,, L,, t.,, L,,, t,., APPROXIMATE HEIGHT 4 (FEET) rrnn n w w N N N t,, AVERAGE SPREAD H 0 0 0 0 0 0 (FEET) `' X ril f X SYMMETRIC O x X X XXX ASYMMETRIC K H DOMINANT J- C J XXXXXn CA X CO-DOMINANT Y O R SUPPRESED YOUNG 1-11 XXX MATURE Y n cn rn '' XXX OVERMATURE H XXXXXX NORMAL o n -O I. n IT a SPARSE z a v H � 'j i , Protected Tree Report: Survey, Encroachment and Protection Plan 758 Hampton Rd.,Arcadia,91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440.February 2017 • This section includes all Protected Trees that are either located or encroaching on the property. It provides data collected from the analysis of construction plans. The tree has been surveyed and numbers correspond to the Site Plan included in this report. Tree numbers with an"os" indicate that the specimen is located off-site and a portion of the canopy extends over the subject property. CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS MATRIX TREE SPECIES SIZE & ROOTZONE IMPACTS REQUIRED PRUNING OF CONDITION LIVE CROWN Protected Trees: �' a, v n = g - u g v - > • Quercus agrifolia, x •° a E '''' .� 5 -d 0' M gel4 . :.- _ -R" a� C Q a) engelmannii, and any A > o a s c a • , �, — b �. C4 other species of A U '3 Z = - ° o � Feb o " o n>, ' • , a, a . atl Quercus genus larger W O ao . '� . . c — r , �'than 12" F-4w Ha.) .o . a ^c o > th 0 1. ; a E c .,. a 3o RSw. cd ;- Z • Platanus racemosa2 ,4 3 -v ,� o o; I .i �, ,,.;, '�-' W y r., x k x = A U o O 4:1 v 0 • Any tree located in the Aa o '" c 0 b o . E-� public right-of--way 1' ,; o ,a 'c ;ct 1 .5 ca a� o c • All other species 12" or -d X 3 a a •d •-v '� ° s. larger that are not on 'v) '�, .o �.- b = W a Z 5 ._. re p oo ca Q' VD cd the exemption list W W 4- Q 1 Quercus agrifolia 26 Good - W _-- Yes <10 -_ 0 N/A 2 Ulmus parvifolia 24 Good - - _-- Yes <10 __ 0 N/A 3 Pinus halepensis 18 Good - - _-_ Yes <10 -_ 0 N/A 4 Pinus halepensis 19 Good S S ---_ Yes <20 __ 0 N/A 5 Cupaniopsis anacardioides 13 Poor All - ___ - - - - - - - 6 Cupaniopsis anacardioides 14 Good N - --_ Yes <10 __ 0 N/A 7 Pittosporum undulatum 10 Fair - - -_- Yes <10 -_ 0 N/A 10 w N ::: o ,0 00 TREE NUMBER b c 'C 'U •ti • • • • 0 CC t1n. Cr k<0 X - .- FT - `` ., cu ., a. Cri ' (13 y bP � r+ (40- � PCCD n• :A C. <. ggsg 5. 9 "CD 7 A N = ti . ". ril E4 0 w 0 CD . C u, W N o W TRUNK DIAMETER (DBH) 0 pz dN 0 0 0 .-Il �n :Il n °. a. a. ' ' CONDITION p R° H z ii C v_ az �nz Sides of tree where excavation z - `- (six inches or deeper) will occur 1-'4 Sides where excavation impacts are z , , , P `"d buffered by existing infrastructure 7d — y N V) Excavation will remain a distance 0 of at least 5 X DBH from trunk 4 Excavation will remain a distance. r 1. . u e tru.r,.. . na Removal or Relocation •i a 7,3 „< p< .< ,.< Additional light grading less than n CD CD CD 6CD " deep to occur within dripline 0 a AA A A Estimated % of total root mass e0-4- W N ~� ii tio 0 0 0 o to be removed or severed No Pruning Required �rjCD ,c /0 � egg Pruning not to exceed 10% . 7d , ' o¢42 o. nril - aa 2r: E . 0 0 0 0 Number of cuts larger than 3" og in diameter required z C' z z z z Diameter ofcutsfor branchremovals vaaa o • Protected Tree Report: Survey,Encroachment and Protection Plan • 758 Hampton Rd.,Arcadia,91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440.February 2017 FINDINGS • Trees#5, #12 and#13 will be removed. Removals will occur to accommodate the primary dwelling structure and not any secondary structure or other infrastructure, e.g., pool house, pool, motor court, or sports court. None of these trees are of exceptional quality that would justify relocating them to another area on the property. Replacing each tree with a nursery quality tree would achieve an adequate mitigation. • A typical five-foot overexcavation near Tree#11 would impact the health and stability. An effort should be made to reduce the overexcavation as much as possible. • All required excavation for the other nine Protected Trees will occur on one side of each tree and it is at tolerable distances from the trunks of both Protected Trees; at least a distance equal to five times the trunk diameter. RECOMMENDATIONS As with many construction projects, soil compaction is the most preventable impact that will need to be monitored in order to provide reliable protection and long-term preservation of the trees. To prevent unnecessary soil compaction a protective fence must be installed around the Protected Trees before any demolition occurs. The goal is to enclose the largest possible amount of space underneath the tree so that the heavy equipment required for demolition and construction can be routed away from root zones. The recommended fence placements are drawn in dashed lines on the Site Plan of this report. The main haul route for the demolition phase and into most of the construction phase shall be the existing driveway. • Prior to demolition the contractor and consulting arborist shall meet on site to make sure fences are properly placed and installed and to review the goals for the tree protection plan. The location of the protective fences are drawn with a dashed line on the Site Plan included in this report. • Tree Protection Zone fences shall be at least four feet tall and constructed of chain link fencing secured on metal posts. • The fenced protection zones may be altered during construction; however, any alterations of the fenced protection zones must be approved by the arborist of record. • Maintain the fences throughout the completion of the project. No staging of materials or equipment or washing-out is to occur within the fenced protected zones. 12 Protected Tree Report: Survey,Encroachment and Protection Plan 758 Hampton Rd.,Arcadia,91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440.February 2017 • The removal of existing turfgrass and other vegetation near the Protected Trees shall be done by hand. No rototilling or other deep cultivation or grading shall occur within the driplines. • Refer to the Construction Impact Guidelines in Appendix B for important general preservation measures concerning the different elements of this project. 13 Protected Tree Report: Survey,Encroachment and Protection Plan ' 758 Hampton Rd.,Arcadia,91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440.February 2017 APPENDIX A — Photos r" 1 2 , , ,, ...,. ." . J.,. .. 1 t -..rils .,4:..Ar-- e. �r V 3'¢ rZ yi ;T:;-,---,-,:-.,,. ABOVE: Looking east at Trees #1 and #2. No construction will encroach. BELOW: The trunk of Tree #1 is just off-site. The garden wall on the property line will most likely remain. 4,., i .r .�.: '•,11. . i .10 , 4 tgli -II= . Y • F f- I ! j'd • 14 Protected Tree Report: Survey,Encroachment and Protection Plan 758 Hampton Rd.,Arcadia,91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440.February 2017 tr i\ 'if '', . --/*. -.. ./ . i. „, , , . , ;\. '--',\ . .. .1 1 i V rt , , 3,, 7 ‘,...._ k is, .i .... 7 . . . ., 14 ,:r.,., , r lt 4., . _?,. ;tik, li, fi M 1' !� /10 , ) r's . iii . 0.••'''---.---- ' ) t 7:r_ IN ' 50...-'°41----- -00<000,.101011'',-A '',. .. , t - - , iiiir.:000 . ,,,,,A , ..4 • ,,, ,,,,v. . _ ... , t,$. _ _ . 4„ ... .... ,. ... --47. I . a r J ABOVE: The trunk of Tree #4 is located several feet from the existing home. The new house will have a further setback. BELOW: There are a few non-protected fruit trees in the landscape, such as this olive tree located near the east property line. �' it1. _ ` N Sp "4 ifi, ' ,'"4,4„, '', tifl; . ' - ,* .A 40 \, PVIStilt ' t �r: . j/1 a i • • WTD • - , , Nit , • 'o t :I_ r' ' fsn lift 1 tr 'u 15 ' Protected Tree Report: Survey,Encroachment and Protection Plan 758 Hampton Rd.,Arcadia,91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440. February 2017 7t.$ 4 w i ;ii - y -' tt :! s '.} itiv 1 ) ^l* ` • a i i -..--- -.....aggiiiiiii ijimll- ABOVE: The required overexcavation for the foundation of the house will occur where Tree #5 is located. It will be removed and replaced. BELOW: Tree #5 has structural defects resulting from several large branch failures. It is a poor candidate for relocation. r . 11411/4 \ r, }fit S r . J�v i. ' . •`• f' .� ....Y' �. .-.. . .... ,. '• * ,� j rte. •-• .1. - :--,,,.....-...4 5 .,...,. •. .. ..ght .., , •., lio-p--- ' e" '.- ", . 44 `` ,. r t t d 3. r` l6 Protected Tree Report: Survey,Encroachment and Protection Plan 758 Hampton Rd.,Arcadia,91006 Michael Crane.RCA#440.February 2017 .r 5 ? 6 , ti ,. . a a r ', or �. ABOVE: Tree #6 is located in the back yard. No construction related encroachments will occur. BELOW: Trees #7-#11 are grouped in the southwest quadrant of the property. All trees will be preserved. y. ilt4 `� ., - ...., i „di-4,' ,it- .'-' ' . . .,4, . .,-4-' : ). ff r- Y ' _. l ( 11 = SIC. i r..:. :. 7_ rF I if- ,.f s why.. 17 • Protected Tree Report: Survey,Encroachment and Protection Plan 758 Hampton Rd.,Arcadia,91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440.February 2017 t-... ���'r t 1 J / a,/ti:., Ate; r .II - v 4 e ....,.. .. ....,._,. 4 , , N.::, ,, . . , . „: itc It'+i. it. 4 fos ;,,,,,,,t r'* 13 3 ,..I •lv Iii / .•tom Y ..t. O ABOVE and BELOW: The required overexcavation for the foundation of the new home will occur where Trees #12 and #13 are located. Both will be removed and replaced. Both trees have structural elements that prevents them from being good candidate for relocation. , t• 1 VA ' ' ' r. i '' r P '''',1 4.0:./ ite404„:"::4 . .),.ate• + /. JP.' V MIN,mss 18 • Protected Tree Report: Survey,Encroachment and Protection Plan 758 Hampton Rd.,Arcadia,91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440.February 2017 APPENDIX B - Protected Tree Construction Impact Guidelines Size and Distribution of Tree Roots —Taken from Arboriculture, Integrated Management of Landscape Trees Shrubs and Vines. Harris, R.W., Clark, J.W., Matheny N.P. Prentice Hall 2004. Roots of most plants, including large trees, grow primarily in the top meter(3 ft) of soil (see figure below). Most plants concentrate the majority of their small absorbing roots in the upper 150 mm(6 in.) of soil if the surface is protected by a mulch or forest litter. In the absence of a protective mulch, exposed bare soil can become so hot near the surface that roots do not grow in the upper 200 to 250 mm (8 to 10 in.). Under forest and many landscape situations, however, soil near the surface is most favorable for root growth. In addition, roots tend to grow at about the same soil depth regardless of the slope of the soil surface. Although root growth is greatly influenced by soil conditions, individual roots seem to have an inherent guidance mechanism. Large roots with vigorous tips usually grow horizontally. Similar roots lateral to the large roots grow at many angles to the vertical, and some grow up into the surface soil. However, few roots in a root system actually grow down. • j. ' y•, ) ' ••j%ht ' r; • ' Depth In ft. Depth In meters 3 • 1.0 6 1.5 FIGURE In mature trees,the taproot is either lost or reduced in size.The vast majority of the root system is composed ofhorizdntally oriehted lateral roots. 19 0 Protected Tree Report: Survey, Encroachment and Protection Plan 758 Hampton Rd.,Arcadia,91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440.February 2017 The importance of soil Soil supports and anchors tree roots and provides water, minerals and oxygen. Furthermore, soil is a habitat for soil microorganisms that enhance root function. A soil's ability to sustain tree growth is largely determined by its texture, structure(bulk density), organic matter,water and mineral content, salinity, aeration, and soil-microbe abundance and diversity. Soil physical properties Soil texture—the relative proportion of sand, silt and clay, is important because it affects water—and nutrient-holding capacity, drainage and aeration(gaseous diffusion). Soil structure is the arrangement of individual soil particles into clumps (aggregates). The net result is the formulation of larger voids between the aggregates which serve as channels for gaseous diffusion, movement of water and root penetration. Unfortunately, soil aggregates are readily destroyed by activities that compact the soil(increase bulk density). When this occurs, gaseous exchange, permeability, drainage and root growth are restricted. The influence of the organic matter content of soil properties is quiet significant. Its decomposition by soil organisms releases substances that bind soil particles into larger granules, which improves both soil aeration, and drainage. In essence, the breakdown of organic matter improves water—and nutrient-holding capacity and reduces bulk density. Furthermore, it is the primary source of nitrogen and a major source of nitrogen and a major source of phosphorus and sulfur. Without organic matter soil organisms could not survive and most biochemical processes in the soil would cease. Soil aeration, the movement and the availability of oxygen, is determined by both soil texture and structure. In general, compacted and finer soils, due to a higher proportion of small pore spaces (micropores),tend to drain slowly and hold less air than coarser, sandy, or well-structured find soils. Water retained in the small pores displaces oxygen and inhibits gaseous diffusion. The availability of soil water is largely determined by the size of the pore spaces between the soil particles and the larger aggregates in which water is held. Most of the water in the larger pore spaces drains readily due to gravitational forces. A relatively thin film of water, which is readily available to plant roots, remains following drainage. Much of water held within the smaller pore spaces resists uptake by plant roots because it is held tightly on the soil surfaces. Plant roots require an adequate supply of oxygen for development. Injury or dysfunction results when oxygen availability drops below a critical level. Root respiration is the first process to be restricted, followed by disruptions in growth, metabolism, nutrient and water uptake, and photosynthesis. Furthermore,the accumulation of high levels of carbon dioxide,produced by the roots during respiration can also impair root function. Reduced soil aeration resulting from soil compaction, flooding, excess irrigation, or 20 • Protected Tree Report: Survey,Encroachment and Protection Plan 758 Hampton Rd.,Arcadia,91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440.February 2017 impervious pavement favors the development of crown rot (Phytophthora root disease). It also inhibits mycorrhizal fungi that enhance water and nutrient uptake and resist root pathogens. The forest floor under a canopy in most undeveloped forests and woodland settings is typically covered by a layer of fallen leaves and other woody debris. It is usually cool, shady, well-aerated, and relatively moist—conditions that favor normal root growth. When the natural leaf litter is removed and when a tree's lower canopy is pruned up to provide clearance, the absorbing roots in the upper few inches of the soil experience higher soil temperatures and increased desiccation due to direct exposure to sunlight. Minimizing the Effects of Construction and Development on Tree Root Systems Activities that injure roots or adversely affect the root zone should be avoided or kept as far from the trunk as possible. Design changes or alternative building practices that avoid or minimize construction-related impacts should be considered and proposed when applicable. Soil Compaction Soils are intentionally compacted under structures, sidewalks, reads, parking areas, and load-bearing fill to prevent subsidence, and to prevent soil movement on slopes. Although unintentional, soil within the root zone of trees is often compacted by unrestricted foot traffic, parking of vehicles, operation of heavy equipment, and during installation of fill. Compaction destroys the soil's natural porosity by eliminating much of the air space contained within it. It leaves the soil hardm impenetrable and largely unfavorable for root growth. The soil's natural porosity, which allows for water movement and storage, gaseous exchange, and root penetration, is greatly reduced. Consequently, root growth and tree health suffer. Soil compaction is best managed by preventing it. Bulk density is used to describe a soil's porosity, or the amount of space between soil particles and aggregates. High bulk densities indicate a low percentage of total pore space. Pavement Paving over the root systems of trees is another serious problem because it reduces the gaseous diffusion and soil moisture. Most paving materials are relatively impervious to water penetration and typically divert water away from a tree's root zone. Cracks and expansion joints do, though, allow for some water infiltration into the soil below. Of greater concern, is the loss of roots from excavation to achieve the required grade, and the necessary compaction to prevent subsidence. Once the soil surface is compacted, a base material is then added and compacted as well. With that done,the surface can then be paved. Thus, pavement within the root zones of trees can damage roots and create 21 • Protected Tree Report: Survey,Encroachment and Protection Plan 758 Hampton Rd.,Arcadia,91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440.February 2017 unfavorable soil conditions. One alternative to minimize pavement impacts is to consider placing the pavement on the natural grade over a layer of minimally compacted base material. To reduce sub-grade compaction, consider using reinforced concrete or asphalt over a goetextile blanket to help stabilize the soil. On-grade patios or paving that covers more than one-third of the tree protection zone (TPZ) should be constructed using permeable materials that allow aeration and water penetration. Soil under permeable surfaces should not be compacted to more than 80 percent. Excavation and root pruning Excavation within the root zones of trees should be avoided as much as possible. The extent of root pruning (selective) or cutting (non-selective) should be based on the species growth characteristics and adaptive traits, environmental conditions, age, health, crown size, density, live crown ration and structural condition of the tree. The timing of the root pruning or cutting is another important consideration. Moderate to severe root loss during droughts or particularly hot periods can cause serious water-deficit injury or • death. When root pruning/cutting is unavoidable, roots should be pruned or cut as far from the trunk as possible. Cutting roots on more than one side of a tree should also be avoided. Root cutting extending more than half-way around a tree should generally be no closer than about 10 times the trunk diameter. Recommended distances range from as little as 6 times trunk diameter (DBH) for young trees to 12 limes trunk diameter for mature trees. The size of the TPZ should,however, be increased for over mature and declining trees and species that are sensitive to root loss. The minimum distance from the trunk that roots can be cut on one side of the tree without destabilizing it, is a distance equal to about three times the diameter (DBH) of the trunk. Roots severed within that distance provide little or no structural support. Root pruning or cutting distances from the trunk should be greater for trees that lean and/or those growing on shallow or wet soil. In cases where the proposed grading will adversely affect trees designated for retention, special attention should be given to proper root pruning and post-construction care for injured trees. Where structural footings are required for foundations, retaining walls, etc., and roots larger than 2 inches in diameter will be impacted, consider design changes or alternative building methods. When excavation within 5 times trunk diameter is unavoidable, roots greater than 1 %z inches in diameter should be located prior to excavation and then pruned to avoid unnecessary damage. Hand-digging or use of a hydraulic or pneumatic soil excavation tool is the least disruptive way to locate roots for pruning. Although mechanical root pruners make clean cuts, they are non-selective. A backhoe bucket, dozer blade or trencher will typically pull, rip or shatter the larger root, causing additional damage toward the tree. Once the roots that interfere with the structure being built, e.g., 22 a Protected Tree Report: Survey,Encroachment and Protection Plan 758 Hampton Rd.,Arcadia,91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440. February 2017 foundations, footings, retaining wall, curbs, etc., are exposed, they should then be cut perpendicular to their long axis using a hand-saw, `carbide-tipped chainsaw' or sharp ax, depending on size. Roots that are pruned in this manner typically regenerate new roots from near the cut. Roots exposed by excavation should be protected from exposure to sun and desiccation. Exposed roots that can not be covered with soil by the end of the day should be covered with moistened burlap or similar material. Roots can generally be cut in a non-selective manner when excavating near of beyond the dripline. Ripped, splintered or fractured portions of roots however, should be re-cut. The damaged portion should be removed using sharp tools. The cut should be flat across the root with the adjacent bark intact. Wound dressings should not be applied to pruned or damaged roots except when recommended for disease, insect or sprout control. The best approach to avoid water-deficit injury following root loss during the growing season is to provide ample irrigation. Irrigation should be considered prior to, during, and after root pruning. Watering schedules should also consider local soil conditions, climate, topography, time of year, species adaptability, extent of root pruning and tree health. If possible, irrigate the tree 7 to 10 days prior to excavation so that there is an adequate reservoir of soil water. Water can be delivered to large construction sites via water-tank trucks and applied directly to affected trees or stored nearby in plastic tanks. On relatively flat terrain, a 6 to 8 inch soil berm at the tree's dripline should be constructed to act as a watering basin. On steep terrain, soaker hoses should be used. They can be placed across the slope or spirally around the trunk, from about six feet away to the dripline. In addition, a two to four inch layer of wood chip mulch should be applied to as much of the root zone as possible to retard soil water loss. Pruning foliage to compensate for root loss is not supported by scientific research and likely to result in slower recovery. Fertilization to stimulate root growth is generally unwarranted and may be counterproductive. Trenching within the Tree Protection Zone Trenching for underground utilities should be routed around the TPZ. When this is unavoidable, trenching within the TPZ should be done by `hand' or using a pneumatic or hydraulic soil excavation tool, carefully working around larger roots. Roots larger than 1 1/2 inches in diameter should not be cut. Dig below these roots to route utilities or install drains. A combination of tools can also produce satisfactory results, for example, a skillful backhoe operator under the arborist's supervision can dig down several inches at a time and detect larger roots by `feel' (resistance). At that point, as assistant can expose the root and dig around it. In this manner,the backhoe can then continue extending the trench though the TPZ. Tunneling (boring) through the TPZ is the preferable alternative. For most large trees, tunneling depth should be at least 36 inches. Tunneling should begin at the edge of the TPZ, but no closer than a distance equal to one foot of clearance for each inch of tree DBH. Tunnels should also be offset to either side of the trunk. For trenching that extends only part way into TPZ, consider trenching radially to the tree trunk, as this is less harmful than tangential trenching. All trenches 23 t Protected Tree Report: Survey,Encroachment and Protection Plan 758 Hampton Rd.,Arcadia,91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440.February 2017 made within the TPZ should be backfilled as quickly as possible to prevent root and soil desiccation. Managing Root Injured Trees Root-pruned trees should be monitored for symptoms of water-deficit injury for a specified period following root pruning. Irrigation should be considered prior to, during, and after root pruning. Irrigation schedules should consider local soil conditions, climate, topography, time of year, species tolerance, extent of root pruning and tree health. Grade Change: Fill Soil Fill soil placed within the root zones of trees can have an adverse effect,particularly if the soil is compacted to support a structure or pavement. Soil compaction reduces aeration and water infiltration. Fill soil, die to textural changes, can also prevent water from penetrating the original soil layer below where the roots are. Furthermore, soil placed against the root crown and lower trunk can lead to root disease problems, especially if the soil near the trunk remains moist during the summer from irrigation. Alternatives to placing fills over roots zones shall be considered and proposed as appropriate. 24 46 0 , awl 4.40.1 MCO 1'� OWL 11.9.10.0 Cite I R+tin'9,4 .9......•.». —7 aIOC'l[�O a00L'KN OEI9ff 3M Z' u,yn�ryry�.uv.w Iwwu�wi O .1. •✓.y n•aw.�uM ••uPwNryP ..,m .. P:/ i olsu,xllV 1 payplaD 111.041 1+s1 ue se paxiuiro»s.1yalay.i pawtu auxlt alp .. _, 'a1NIt1JiltxjiV t,Alaixsy IeuU13eu1.vui aip!itex s illi '.'�;'� . •:�`' uoIiW13t11a31a11oy1v ay Ay las vuawanub i ay psualdwi»AIlpgssaaltss.Iul.suii (1:/i caw:enp 4441,ssassy ysy aaq Msl st oatue ceu Agwtl4 mai eioa aW ax9Pngtyp F tsamS 3U G.I D •1 1 ap,q DUAI i_M i,,,,i,..a.aw ic t',.%"..01,43 a II 49 PWC9QC1ls911w INntet aII Peiertlea Appno.s ewei4 aueJD''pi43!W UOIIL�II�!]L'11� ;1(JUt55J55 `I51 - JJa� miSI'iO921V'131SVW U31i1111: ) CI'1VOU V] iiiii1111111f1DniaRiV 40 A13IJOS INNOIJyN2i31N I aan;#mLiogau;o 423uo4$ IPuoIWlu3W till. n[ r.a �v vl o CD C) CDQ. CD tsanbs uoan saix,issiwwo•)JO wla4siO+U!to��.getuasastlas Aue of u,Mous aq ysnw aswarl snu ~,,.'."i �t1- 7p owl. g I Il,1 1 •Alts i i c' z'8f.urmunf V, d,ys.ayw)W p.uals3Xaj P S L L l6 VD VNOVSVdLe! r ZZLLSXO8Od g °Og 3Ntr2I3 f 13VH3IW ott# v i LauEaD Iartpq, E g sLOZ l0/l0 •a3nss �3�Q�9y sauo6ale� >. 9602/I•£/Z L :S3ZIIdX3 £68SL :#t asuaon ""'""''�' 7 y�y A E 7 3SN301-1 83SIA0V 1Oa.N001S3d 1Vanhll01a5V s71/mrieu<xdvSuu/nru.)p.u.gclaay o P. a 10)s7usw.uenM.,alp ju ru,w,10/410 11.14114gel 1,4 41 • � �,t P.O /Li F}. 4. a dro c,1 WtlaJOeld NO11H01311830/ONISN3011 ) �p Bum n.uO o QawO uv.i i.1au! a a Nouvine98 301011534 30 1N3W121Vd3a SjS1 CI fI �� '� S d N — .p o :1 g NJ' r Protected Tree Report: Survey,Encroachment and Protection Plan 758 Hampton Rd.,Arcadia,91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440.February 2017 CERTIFICATION OF PERFORMANCE I, Michael Crane, certify that: • I have personally inspected the tree(s)and the property referred to in this report and have stated my findings accurately. • I have no current or prospective interest in the vegetation or the property that is the subject of this report and have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved. • The analysis, opinions, and conclusions stated herein are my own and are based on current scientific procedures and facts. • My analysis, opinions, and conclusions were developed and this report has been prepared according to commonly accepted arboricultural practices. • No one provided significant professional assistance to me, except as indicated within the report. • My compensation is not contingent upon the reporting of a predetermined conclusion that favors the cause of the client or any other party not upon the results of the assessment,the attainment of stipulated results, or the occurrence of any subsequent events. I further certify that I am a member in good standing of the American Society of Consulting Arborists and the International Society of Arboriculture. I have been involved in the field of Horticulture in a full-time capacity for a period of more than 25 years. • Signed: Registered Consulting Arborist #440; American Society of Consulting Arborist Board Certified Master Arborist #WE 6643B; International Society of Arboriculture Licensed California Agricultural Pest Control Adviser#AA08269 February 10, 2017 /:;;;;I: C444 Date: 003 n~ a sn�U/t\r y. ct�sucR re t�h 1,30-7 wnsultis 26 t) ,P_ /'1= / 1 1.1-4 lir I, •��.1--"---":-......_-°. t� "'fit lit r--.- �� �'a' -�V}�aT!'16'w rCE3 ].�a -f�i r :':f: - [-meal 1 i��l?,5! / C740 3N II„rw;.A n. , > r , r . 3 IS. ml,ea I (m<1!1 m 74? LK/ r\.. . i.[n/, rE 'al ♦ e -,r4)!:.---4)---1 ^, !P'a'rt 403, e In 4- ,S /it ref nn>1) 1--..----) f 1 1 fXavf 1 1 1; tin/ FIT*, rrc./ w , 'I� Il tro>vel S+v. lmtall 1q yIT1�V,�awf`r.u� I1� • .2i,. VI 1} P' moi' / �Isl 1 fits Pll r s pq J« {)ant .[ I /:'r� /1J s 1 ''L se+ II } 1 ?�Ys tGAor 1 Il/G a a, sue ��<ayF'i+o) I . Zs'� f%e a f % /— � � +� vxr-o.a ] ) Ira= ro ?• lt +1 � rm.c ra'r�S�ie° >I tns.II . ,.'1_o ro f ea) i s � ff y3 ,.,1 (Inv.s, t403.4 4) \¢ e.""y' p�' S� Is I /ol oo) \ (1/ .- ....i.__...4.,.\::-.1....„:„.,_p ..:.c .,,,.Ino.-- I I ` -�Sm� l; f II t%hs' 1 >_ I IT v+Yn I w I ' f, Irl Ii, r 111 uP n) { C.r* I v. I � , I __ �.f{ • i- I • 4 .w-1.-.__. e'i_�1. I:�� v —1..+--i 1.' I/' f 4,.e7 ' - >oy'pa.—CriT 7 Ir;'•- • 1 I rl C■ 1.. I ` 1� II (706 72) I.`. I �t V f 1 I r 7 I t , i I tc(rn C%)I0 41Ce\B.) `. JrL.-, i,•\• I I '� 't'. - t`i:._..,..r.' i, rvu I I' f ' �I,s„1:rte �( oaf!) :„')at�.)rIL T �1 � ' l S .:a.: ,''...5 "L)k1t) . Clv.ul `( I I \\71-1501.:1111.; � II s �': I 1 .:) Iii �1 _ 1 oI U4D :cPI :o rca 1 I Oafi 51) I\\ I , 4 ` ' 3-..i3;'',CI n \ I�Ie=v) C 1 '.... • �!_Y Ids) 3wii)tr I )oar 1 \'�' _ SI roi. • • ccc ��) j ) a .cam. 1 it e l t oasq I try,,), 1 I It• ..n 1 h r._;) , r �(� y!401it. 1 1r tr• ylia,a5) 1 __ .s r... t'e”" _ -e 2> I 'p `r51T� 3:=..9T 11 Y\ 1 1 u1!.4•1 y q - •-.• f \_far / $I �I( 1 r .meq ' fol. `uta ! 11:.s1.` dl^., f:- - F• $ +y - IIIXI- 4 h g.- `.-n I n.l 6. c • Clooa _ Ir .. i ' ` G u I '.' nw1. VI FI(�[ r�I '-rusnl II `I ' 4.' ' 11 I I I v.,.h'�-ra �II"�jl� L^{ma)B II I ////1 I itI)41e5`II I LINO .lac I 1 f 4 - I < L� / I Z r� I' I II • .s. I 'I'i II I__ —.— _ v _ _ _ c '[I� I l i LI ) • 7 r 1.441.ia1 �. d?ila>.><i) 7.Nssti Lyi 6)Sftx � �) I , ,. I l� • • ti � 1�„ . ,y�, Iw.?a)� '-1m rarlu .a uac I�:yT t. : � '►�'f"i.¢� � �IZ�` 7 ---- . vl �fraf]I 0. ` 4SFi �'ARBORIST'S NOTE lI 'I r/o "'b'F''a�tl�' 1 ` *".1::-:',X �.c-��"� Il•r. 4.---;.•�f gIn'td,�Tl f i • I I K�.tf^I- _k I . Protected Tries are aammelyplotted. 'They indole all native oaks and r '• '�` o �\ Ili \�",tslrp. stC\s �� .. Dyrimores as wdlaithose among nonexempt gens that have trunk... 1_I'_ S!os,sni i .0:4 kg ' a) _ I I1wl _•�J Int+' fY e= v • -.T diameters large enough b Qualify Iona:adw status.The extents of the I , 1 ocn'w 1 1 u irh'+�- "--�, J,-A\ f• =tri try d 1 t 1f' driplmes of the Protected Nafive Trees are drawn in a solid lints eight _ fl( &rational points., 15-foot radius b drawn around the lank of all non- fmd.al '� \ \ �'- I/ t Dative Protected Trees Tree numbers arrrlalabthe mfetatm mode In ! _."--'-r•as.�” .a,-ro- ' ` n- •t • Ir —=-e-' this report and thin iambi,is tagged beach tree'etrirnk, ro-- — • l '"--\—\�� �� 11 - ) - The dashed line is where isrcommended to instal(cooing for-the •j - �- � ri1 �, . ., ' esmblisbment ofiTrec PlotectioZone(TPZ).The haul roots andmateiial Z ` ._I�_ - . I •, storage ma shag be toured in the nanhwestquedreot ofthaplopain b ty thin IL -t e', ' . !. dear of all Protected Trees. 1 • ‘ , 1-10,--N Arbor Care Inc. Arboricultural Consulting & Plant Health Care info@ArborCarelnc.net 626-737-4007 DATE: March 16, 2018 TO: City of Arcadia Planning Division 240 W. Huntington Drive, P.O. Box 60021 Arcadia, CA 91007 FROM: Michael Crane Arbor Care, Inc. SUBJECT: 758 Hampton R.-Addendum to Protected Tree Report Preservation of an olive tree-design analysis and recommendations Refer to original Protected Tree Report dated February 2017. Due to their wide use as a landscape specimen tree,olives trees (Olea spp.)have been restricted from the category of fruit trees and therefore moved off of the list of exception trees,which qualifies fruit trees as being non-protected. Olive trees are Protected according to this slight amendment to the tree ordinance. One olive tree exists on the property and the tree was not included in the original Protected Tree Report; however,my analysis of the design with the consideration of the great tolerance of olive trees to root pruning,I determine that the tree can be reliably preserved in place and the current design accommodates the tree appropriately. The subject tree is mature and in good heath and structural condition. It is located near the east property line in the side yard area. The existing home's foundation is located within five feet of the trunk and the proposed home's foundation will have a similar setback,but the assumed overexcavation to construct the building pad may come within a foot of the trunk. This would be a severe encroachment on most all broadleaf trees but olives are extremely tolerant of root pruning so the encroachment will be tolerable. The current plans have a planter area designed on center of the tree and this design will accommodate the tree very well. No changes to the design are required and the protective fence that will be set for the adjacent pine tree (Tree#4) can easily be extended to incorporate the olive. One of the primary reasons that olives are used in landscapes,particularly redesigned ones,is their tolerance of root pruning. Mature olives are commonly dug from orchards with a rootball that is just a foot or several inches from the exposed buttress area. This greatly reduces the overall installation cost and allows for large mature trees to be planted in a new design at a relatively low cost. Since the subject tree will not be encroached on one side and not brought through the rigors of a typical transplanting it is very likely that the tree will be unaffected by the construction. Nevertheless,I plan to monitor of throughout the project. \ I have attached a photo of the tree along with the section of the site plan than includes it. Please email me with any questions or concerns. ,-- Sincerely, ./1,:—EL C�.v 7 (1' 7 - rN�ulr Ana._ ,fur+ Michael Crane �'s.� Ca►sultia,1 1111111 lIl Y1. f it'. 7'.M;.%„‘„,.. 1•••• :I. ..: ...L.', ,', ' f• i4<tor '''.,4 , / ii& 11. , i,i,, 1 ° G: , „ . ;. 1 j • s P c;x" ti. '.• 1 i •p + i Olive • I ,•,. I + • Tree 1.f ABOVE: Looking north at the olive tree from the east side yard area. BELOW: The tree can reliably be incorporated into the planter that is part of the current design. --N-----\\- . - _EPPO PINE 18' ALEPPO PINE r — --—-—- — " — " — 1 IrAilMucsmorimmallilL-........-s--4.—....... • i 1 YtXBERA — I! - - t Olive • Tree �- . ' 1 _-. • _ ,..mmmo.-. ,a► or,r.._ rX \. 4 • 4 • 4, -- tom. ..,_.__- . •11•11111. 16• • ; : . : 74 . . , . . . ,.., . . Etuarts ,,AP 7PS 75 I