No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 11a - Multi-Benefit Stormwater Project Concept Reports and Memorandum of AgreementProfessional Services Agreement with Craft Water Engineering, Inc. and Memorandum of Agreement for the Rio Hondo/San Gabriel River Water Quality Group May 5, 2020 Page 1 of 5 DATE: May 5, 2020 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Tom Tait, Public Works Services Director By: Vanessa Hevener, Environmental Services Officer SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CRAFT WATER ENGINEERING, INC. FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE MULTI- BENEFIT STORWATER PROJECT CONCEPT REPORTS FOR THE RIO HONDO/SAN GABRIEL RIVER WATER QUALITY GROUP IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,623,041 AND MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT WITH THE CITIES OF BRADBURY, DUARTE, MONROVIA, AND SIERRA MADRE AND THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES REGARDING THE ADMINISTRATION AND COST SHARING OF THE AGREEMENT Recommendation: Approve SUMMARY The Public Works Services Department solicited bids for a Professional Services Agreement (“PSA”) to prepare the Multi-Benefit Stormwater Project Concept Reports for the five projects and green streets identified in the Rio Hondo/San Gabriel River Water Quality Group’s Watershed Management Program (“WMP”) Plan. The Group, consisting of the Cities of Arcadia, Bradbury, Duarte, Monrovia, and Sierra Madre as well as the County of Los Angeles, have agreed to prepare a Memorandum of Agreement (“MOA”) to aid in the administration, implementation, and cost sharing of the WMP Plan including the PSA (Exhibit “A”). The total cost of the PSA will be divided between members based on the agreed cost sharing formula outlined in the Memorandum of Agreement, as follows: 10% base for participation plus 90% based on each agency’s land area that drains to the Los Angeles and San Gabriel rivers. The total project cost is $1,623,041. The City of Arcadia’s cost share is approximately $720,532.23. It is recommended that the City Council authorize and direct the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Craft Water Engineering, Inc. for the preparation of the Multi-Benefit Stormwater Project Concept Reports for the Rio Hondo/San Gabriel Water Quality Group in the amount of $1,623,041 and Memorandum of Agreement with the Cities of Bradbury, Duarte, Monrovia, and Sierra Madre and the County of Los Angeles regarding the administration and cost sharing of the Agreement. Professional Services Agreement with Craft Water Engineering, Inc. and Memorandum of Agreement for the Rio Hondo/San Gabriel River Water Quality Group May 5, 2020 Page 2 of 5 BACKGROUND The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System Permit (“MS4 Permit”, Order No. R4-2012-0175) establishes the waste discharge requirements for stormwater and non-stormwater discharges within the watersheds of Los Angeles County. The MS4 Permit was adopted by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region (“Regional Board”), on November 8, 2012, and became effective on December 28, 2012. The MS4 Permit includes provisions that allow permittees the flexibility to customize their stormwater programs to achieve compliance over time on a watershed scale utilizing customized strategies, control measures, and Best Management Practices (“BMPs”). In May 2013, the Cities of Arcadia, Azusa, Bradbury, Duarte, Monrovia, and Sierra Madre, along with the County of Los Angeles and the Los Angeles County Flood Control District entered into a joint Memorandum of Understanding for cost sharing and the development of the Enhanced Watershed Management Program (“EWMP”) and the Coordinated Integrated Monitoring Plan (“CIMP”) or “Plans” for the Rio Hondo/San Gabriel River watersheds. The EWMP plan was completed and submitted to the Regional Board on July 28, 2014, and subsequently approved in April 2016 with the requirement to start implementing the plan. The EWMP plan consisted of 10 regional projects (two of which are located in the City of Arcadia), and 436 lane miles of “green streets” (e.g., bio-retention, bio-filtration and permeable pavement systems within the street right-of-way that are designed to reduce runoff and improve water quality) to be completed over the next two decades. The estimated cost to implement the EWMP was $1.4 billion; Arcadia’s share was approximately $357 million. Soon after the EWMP approval, the Group began working diligently to evaluate alternative implementation strategies to determine whether a modified set of alternative projects could possibly achieve the necessary volume and load reductions at a significantly reduced cost and still achieve compliance. For example, an alternative project would utilize the area around the Peck Road Water Conservation Park (“Peck Park”) as a single point of treatment rather than installing numerous smaller devices upstream of Peck Park. In December 2016, the Group amended the Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) to collaborate on the EWMP revision without the City of Azusa. A revised EWMP was submitted in March2018, which was conditionally approved a year later in March 2019, but was downgraded from a revised EWMP to a Watershed Management Program (the “WMP”). The downgrade was the result of the changes in the control measures proposed in the revised EWMP. Professional Services Agreement with Craft Water Engineering, Inc. and Memorandum of Agreement for the Rio Hondo/San Gabriel River Water Quality Group May 5, 2020 Page 3 of 5 DISCUSSION The Group of cities developed a scope of services for the Multi-Benefit Stormwater Project Concept Reports Request for Proposals (“RFP”). The primary objective of the RFP is to prepare the project concept reports that include a feasibility study and 30% design plan for each of the five multi-benefit projects identified in the Group’s approved WMP so that they will be suitable for grant funding applications. The City of Arcadia will again take the lead as project manager. In this role, the City will be responsible for the administration of contract services and collecting and administering funds under the new MOA. The City of Arcadia will be acting in this capacity at no cost to the participating agencies. All of the agencies participating are in the process of taking the MOA to their respective City Councils and/or Boards for approval. On September 23, 2019, the RFP was sent directly to 16 environmental consultants and published in the City’s adjudicated newspaper. Subsequently, the RFP timeline was extended for two additional weeks to allow more time for consultants to respond. Proposals were due to the City by November 12, 2019. Although only two proposals were received, every effort was made to encourage consultants to submit a proposal. The proposals were reviewed, evaluated, and ranked by the participating agencies listed in the MOA, with the following results: RANK FIRM LOCATION COST 1 Craft Water Engineering, Inc. Los Angeles $1,623,041 2 CWE Fullerton $664,463 The two proposals were reviewed and each consulting firm was ranked according to quality and responsiveness; thoroughness of the scope of work; familiarity of the project; background and experience; qualifications; and performance tasks outlined in the RFP. Craft Water Engineering Inc. (“Craft Water”) was rated highest based on a complete evaluation of the above points. While Craft Water Engineering’s cost is more than CWE’s, because the agreement is of professional services in nature, the City is not required to select a firm based solely on price and can instead include a variety of qualitative factors when considering a proposal. The factors supporting the selection include Craft Water team’s expertise with the existing MS4 Permit, expertise and experience developing similar plans, and their existing relationships with the Regional Board Staff, Board members, and key stakeholder groups. In addition, Craft Water Engineering assisted the Group in obtaining an approval for the revision of the Watershed Management Plan in 2019. Craft Water Engineering is in a better position to continue the momentum that was Professional Services Agreement with Craft Water Engineering, Inc. and Memorandum of Agreement for the Rio Hondo/San Gabriel River Water Quality Group May 5, 2020 Page 4 of 5 established during the WMP revision process. For example, if any issues arise with the outcome of the project concept reports, Craft Water would be better prepared to pivot and come up with a workable solution on behalf the Group. Conversely, CWE previously assisted the Group with developing the $1.4 billion original plan and the Group’s experience with working with that firm was one of frustration due to project creep and other delays. Therefore, Craft Water is a preferred vendor for this project. In addition, while the Craft Water proposal is substantially higher than CWE, the proposal consists of five individual reports so the total cost is in line with the County’s estimate of $300,000 per project report. The County’s estimate of anticipated costs also led to concerns that CWE could be underbidding or not based on a realistic scope, which could lead to expensive change orders during the project. The MOA specifies the financial commitment for the implementation of the WMP for each agency based on a cost sharing formula. The total will be divided based on the agreed cost sharing formula as follows: 10% base for participation plus 90% based on each agency’s land area that drains to the Los Angeles and San Gabriel Rivers. The County of Los Angeles has developed the concept and 30% design plans for two green street projects within the WMP boundaries, and is conducting preliminary investigations on a third green street project. The Group has agreed to share in the cost for the County to develop these green street projects. A total of $600,000 has been expended for these projects, and the Group has agreed to credit the County for these costs. Table 1 below shows the cost sharing formula and the cost to each of the participating agencies: Table 1. Cost Allocation Formula Agencies Acres Percent of Area Base Fee (10%) Cost based on Acres (90%) Total Cost City of Arcadia 11 26.51% $37,050.68 $683,481.55 $720,532.23 City of Bradbury 1.9 4.58% $37,050.68 $118,055.90 $155,106.59 City of Duarte 3.6 8.67% $37,050.68 $223,684.87 $260,735.55 City of Monrovia 8 19.28% $37,050.68 $497,077.49 $534,128.17 City of Sierra Madre 2.8 6.75% $37,050.68 $173,977.12 $211,027.81 County of Los Angeles* 4.9 11.81% $37,050.68 $304,459.96 $341,510.65 Total 32.2 100% $222,304.10 $2,000,736.90 $2,223,041.00 *County contributed $600,000 for development of two green streets The City of Arcadia’s cost share for the preparation of the Multi-Benefit Stormwater Project Concept Reports is approximately $720,532.23. Professional Services Agreement with Craft Water Engineering, Inc. and Memorandum of Agreement for the Rio Hondo/San Gabriel River Water Quality Group May 5, 2020 Page 5 of 5 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The proposed action does not constitute a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) under Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, as it can be seen with certainty that it will have no impact on the environment. Thus, this matter is exempt under CEQA. FISCAL IMPACT Annual costs would be divided among participating agencies based on the MOA’s cost share formula. The City of Arcadia’s total cost for the preparation of Multi-Benefit Stormwater Project Concept Reports is approximately $720,532.23. Funds are allocated in Fiscal Years 2018-19 and 2019-20 Capital Improvement Program. The City of Arcadia is expected to receive approximately $1,030,000 in local return from the Safe Clean Water Program (Measure W) annually and this will be used to fund these stormwater plans/projects. No general fund monies are propose to be utilized. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended the City Council determine that this action does not constitute a project and is therefore exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”); and authorize and direct the City Manager to execute the Professional Services Agreement with Craft Water Engineering, Inc. for the preparation of the Multi- Benefit Stormwater Project Concept Reports for the Rio Hondo/San Gabriel Water Quality Group in the amount of $1,623,041, and Memorandum of Agreement with the Cities of Bradbury, Duarte, Monrovia, and Sierra Madre and the County of Los Angeles regarding the administration and cost sharing of the Agreement. Attachments: Exhibit “A” - Memorandum of Agreement Proposed Professional Services Agreement Page 1 MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, THE CITIES OF ARCADIA, BRADBURY, DUARTE, MONROVIA AND SIERRA MADRE REGARDING THE ADMINISTRATION AND COST SHARING FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION AND ADMINISTRATION OF THE WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (WMP) FOR THE RIO HONDO/SAN GABRIEL RIVER WATER QUALITY GROUP This Memorandum of Agreement (“MOA”) is made and entered into as of the date of the last signature set forth below (“EFFECTIVE DATE”) by and among the COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES (“COUNTY”), a political subdivision of the State of California, and the CITIES OF ARCADIA, BRADBURY, DUARTE, MONROVIA, AND SIERRA MADRE (“CITIES”), municipal corporations. These entities shall be known herein as PARTIES or individually as PARTY. RECITALS WHEREAS, the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region (“REGIONAL BOARD”) adopted National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System Permit Order No. R4-2012-0175 “MS4 PERMIT” OR “PERMIT”; and WHEREAS, the MS4 Permit became effective on December 28, 2012, and requires that the Los Angeles County Flood Control District, COUNTY, and 84 of the 88 Cities (excluding the Cities of Avalon, Long Beach, Palmdale, and Lancaster) within the County of Los Angeles comply with the prescribed elements of the MS4 Permit; and WHEREAS, the MS4 Permit identified the PARTIES as located within the Rio Hondo/ San Gabriel Watershed Management Area; and WHEREAS, the PARTIES entered into a memorandum of understanding on August 29, 2013 to form the Rio Hondo/San Gabriel River Water Quality Group (“GROUP”) and collaborate in the development of an Enhanced Watershed Management Program (“EWMP DEVELOPMENT MOU”) in an effort to comply with the requirements of the MS4 Permit; and WHEREAS, the PARTIES submitted an Enhanced Watershed Management Program (“EWMP”) to the REGIONAL BOARD on June 28, 2015, which was approved on April 21, 2016. The REGIONAL BOARD’s approval of the EWMP indicated to begin implementation immediately; and Exhibit "A" Page 2 WHEREAS, the PARTIES amended the EWMP DEVELOPMENT MOU (“FIRST AMENDED MOU”) to collaborate on the initial steps to further investigate project feasibility and finalize the EWMP revision; and WHEREAS, the pursuant to the FIRST AMENDED MOU the PARTIES agreed to work together to revise the EWMP; and WHEREAS, the PARTIES submitted a revised Enhanced Watershed Management Program (the “rEWMP”) to the REGIONAL BOARD on March 30, 2018, and REGIONAL BOARD ultimately approved the rEWMP on March 14, 2019, but ultimately downgraded the revised program to a Watershed Management Program (the “WMP”), which was conditionally approved on March 14, 2019; and WHEREAS, the REGIONAL BOARD’s conditional approval of the WMP dated May 17, 2019 required that the PARTIES begin implementation immediately, and the PARTIES have agreed to a cost sharing formula set forth in Table 2.a of Exhibit A, which is attached and made part of this MOA; and WHEREAS, the PARTIES collaboratively prepared a final Request for Proposal (“REQUEST”) to obtain Consultant(s) to develop feasibility studies to ascertain whether the projects discussed in the WMP are feasible from a technical and financial perspective, and whether any other modifications are required by the MS4 Permit. A copy of the REQUEST is attached hereto as Exhibit B, and incorporated into this MOA by reference; and WHEREAS, the PARTIES propose that various Consultants be retained to perform the work required by the REQUEST, at a total cost not to exceed $1,623,041; and WHEREAS, the Consultants shall obtain approval from the Oversight Committee (defined below) for any action taken in accordance with this MOA; and WHEREAS, the PARTIES have agreed that the CITY OF ARCADIA (“ARCADIA”) will be the contracting PARTY for any agreements necessary to implement the narrow requirements of this MOA; and WHEREAS, the COUNTY is developing the concept and 30% plans for two green street projects within the watershed’s boundaries pursuant to the WMP, and has conducted preliminary investigations on a third green street project (the “GREEN STREETS PROJECTS”); and WHEREAS, PARTIES have agreed to share the cost for COUNTY to develop these green street projects, and to credit the COUNTY for these costs as set forth in Table 2.a of Exhibit B; and NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived by the PARTIES, and of the promises contained in this MOA, the PARTIES agree as follows: Page 3 1. Recitals. The recitals set forth above are incorporated into this MOA. 2. Purpose. The purpose of this MOA is to cooperatively fund work specifically required by the REQUEST. This MOA shall not impact the PARTIES individual obligation to otherwise comply with the requirements of the MS4 PERMIT or WMP. 3. Cooperation. The PARTIES shall cooperate in good faith with one another to implement this MOA. Notwithstanding the foregoing, it shall not be a breach of this MOA for any PARTY to withhold its consent for any decision contemplated by this MOA. 4. Term. The term of this MOA shall become effective as of the date of the last signature set forth below, and shall remain in effect until ARCADIA has provided written notice of completion of the REQUEST described herein and has provided the PARTIES with a final accounting set forth in Section 5 (d). 5. Responsibilities of ARCADIA: (a) Contract Manager. Subject to the limitations and restrictions of this Agreement, ARCADIA shall act as the contract manager on behalf of, and for the benefit of, PARTIES, and as such agrees to invoice the PARTIES for their pro- rata share of the cost of implementing this MOA, as described in Tables 1 thru 3 of Exhibit A. (b) Payments to Third Parties. ARCADIA shall have no obligation to pay vendors or Consultants any funds other than those funds ARCADIA owes for its proportional share, as set forth in Exhibit A, and those funds remitted by each PARTY to ARCADIA following invoice. In the event ARCADIA, in its sole discretion, elects to make a payment on behalf of a Delinquent PARTY, as defined in Section 6(d), the Delinquent PARTY shall reimburse ARCADIA the funds expended. If ARCADIA fails to timely pay vendors or Consultants for its proportional share or to forward funds remitted to ARCADIA from the PARTIES to be paid to said vendors or Consultants, as set forth in Table 3 of Exhibit A, ARCADIA shall be considered a Delinquent PARTY, and the other PARTIES shall have the same rights and remedies against ARCADIA as it (ARCADIA) would have against a Delinquent PARTY, as provided herein and particularly as described in Section 6(d), below. (c) ARCADIA shall solicit proposals for, award, and administer Consultant contract(s) for the work specifically outlined in the REQUEST, which is attached hereto as Exhibit B and in accordance with ARCADIA’s procurement requirements. ARCADIA shall not award any contracts to a Consultant contemplated by this MOA without the express written approval of all of the PARTIES pursuant to Section 6(b). The PARTIES agree, that upon execution of an agreement with a Consultant and/or vendor pursuant to this MOA, that the Page 4 Consultant(s)’ or vendor activities will be directed by the Oversight Committee as set forth in Paragraph 6 (d) ARCADIA shall utilize the funds deposited by the PARTIES only for payment of the Consultant or vendor for the work performed pursuant to the REQUEST. Funds will also be used to offset and credit the COUNTY’s cost- share under this MOA for work done on the two green street projects. ARCADIA will provide the PARTIES with a final accounting of funds expended and remaining at the end of the term of this MOA. (e) ARCADIA shall provide the PARTIES with an electronic copy of any reports (drafts and final) to ultimately be submitted to the REGIONAL BOARD within 5 business days of receipt from the Consultant. (f) ARCADIA will notify the PARTIES if actual expenditures are anticipated to exceed the cost estimates contained in Exhibit A and obtain written approval of such expenditures from all PARTIES. Upon approval of additional expenditures, the PARTIES agree to pay each PARTY’S proportional share of additional expenditures in an amount not to exceed ten (10%) percent of the current estimated cost, as shown in Table 3 of Exhibit A. This 10% contingency will not be invoiced, unless actual expenditures exceed the cost estimates found in Table 3 of Exhibit A. Expenditures that exceed the 10% contingency will require an amendment to this MOA. (g) ARCADIA will submit on behalf of the PARTIES all SUBMITTALS approved pursuant to this MOA. 6. THE PARTIES further agree: (a) Cooperation. The PARTIES shall make a good faith effort to cooperate with one another to achieve the purposes of this MOA by providing information about project opportunities, reviewing deliverables in a timely manner, and informing their respective administrators, agency heads, and/or governing bodies, as necessary. Notwithstanding the foregoing, it shall not be a breach of this MOA for any Party to withhold its consent for any decision contemplated by this MOA. (b) Oversight Committee & Administration. (i) The PARTIES agree that each PARTY shall designate a representative to act on the PARTIES’ behalf. These representatives or their designee shall form the “Oversight Committee.” Each member of the Oversight Committee, shall have the requisite authority to participate in the day-to-day operations of the GROUP, and shall administer the terms and conditions of this MOA on behalf of their respective PARTY, except as limited by the PARTIES’ individual governing regulations, such as municipal codes or county codes. The Oversight Committee shall be Page 5 authorized to and responsible for approving all contracts with any future Contractor entered into pursuant to this Agreement. For example, members of the Oversight Committee shall still remain subject to the spending limits and/or authority limitations imposed on employees of governmental agencies for any expenditures above those set forth in Exhibit A. Any action of the Oversight Committee required or authorized by this Agreement (including direction to any consultant) shall be taken by unanimous approval. However, as a limited exception to this unanimity requirement, the scheduling of meetings and meeting locations shall be determined by a weighted majority vote, with weights assigned to each member of the Oversight Committee in accordance with the percentage of area assigned to that member’s PARTY in Table 2a of Exhibit A. (ii) In addition to the day-to-day operations, the Oversight Committee shall be authorized to approve, and be responsible for approving all reports, studies or other submittals and materials created as a result of the Consultant’s implementation of the REQUEST to be submitted to the REGIONAL BOARD and/or to other agencies on behalf of the GROUP (“SUBMITTAL”). As such, within thirty (30) business days of receiving a draft SUBMITTAL, members of the Oversight Committee or their designees shall provide any revisions or comments to the Consultant, and the Consultant shall incorporate those revisions into the draft SUBMITTAL, and provide a copy of a revised SUBMITTAL to the Oversight Committee shortly thereafter. In the event the Consultant cannot incorporate a PARTY’s revision due to a disagreement amongst the PARTIES and/or the Consultant, the PARTIES shall meet and confer in good faith to resolve the dispute, and the Oversight Committee may then direct the Consultant to modify the SUBMITTAL as agreed upon by the PARTIES. Within 30 business days of receiving a revised SUBMITTAL, members of the Oversight Committee or their designees shall approve in writing, or deny the Consultant’s submission of the revised SUBMITTAL to the REGIONAL BOARD. Consultant shall not, and ARCADIA may not authorize Consultant to, submit any SUBMITTAL to the REGIONAL BOARD or any other public agency on behalf of the PARTIES, unless and until it/they have been approved, in writing, for submittal by all PARTIES hereto by the Oversight Committee pursuant to the requirements of this Section 6(b), excepting only a PARTY or PARTIES that has been EXCLUDED or WITHDRAWN from this MOA. Under no circumstances may any SUBMITTAL be attributed to or sent on the behalf of any PARTY or the GROUP in general that has not provided its written approval as required by this Section 6(b). (iii) In order to approve any SUBMITTAL pursuant to this Section 6(b), each member of the Oversight Committee shall provide the following in regards to their related PARTY: Page 6 (A) Written confirmation of the PARTY’s approval of the SUBMITTAL; and a (B) Written statement that the appropriate authority has approved of the SUBMITTAL. For example, if the SUBMITTAL requires City Council approval, the member of the Oversight Committee shall confirm that the City Council provided the requisite approval. (iv) The Oversight Committee may meet periodically, on an as- needed basis, and as agreed by the Oversight Committee. (v) The PARTIES recognize and agree that no Oversight Committee member, or its designee may commit, bind, or in any way limit the PARTIES’ individual discretion or authority, absent such representatives being granted proper authority pursuant to the PARTIES’ own municipal codes and/or regulations. (c) Payment. The PARTIES shall pay ARCADIA, subject to their annual budget authority, for their proportional share of the estimated cost for implementing this MOA, not to exceed the invoice amounts as shown in Table 3 of Exhibit A, within sixty days (60) days of receipt of the invoice from ARCADIA. The cost estimates presented in Exhibit A have been agreed upon by the PARTIES, and may be amended only by written agreement of the PARTIES, except as otherwise provided in this MOA in the event a PARTY WITHDRAWS or is EXCLUDED. (d) Credit to County. The PARTIES agree to share in the cost of the development of the Green Streets Projects by COUNTY as set forth in Table 2.b of Exhibit A. The areas outside of the project boundaries shall be developed by Consultants. Should the credit to COUNTY exceed COUNTY’s cost-share, the remaining credit may be used for a future agreement. (e) Delinquent Payment. A PARTY’s payment is considered delinquent ninety (90) days after ARCADIA sends an invoice, at which point the PARTY shall be known as a “Delinquent PARTY”. Should a PARTY or PARTIES become a Delinquent PARTY or PARTIES, ARCADIA shall submit a letter to the Delinquent PARTY or PARTIES providing written notice of the PARTY’s delinquent status. If the Delinquent PARTY or PARTIES remain delinquent ten days after receipt of the delinquency notice, said PARTY or PARTIES shall then be deemed to have terminated participation as a PARTY to this MOA only (“EXCLUDED PARTY”) and their name(s) may be removed from any SUBMITTALs created pursuant to this MOA only after that PARTY has been EXCLUDED. Notwithstanding the foregoing, and pursuant to Section 9(l) of this Agreement, whether or not a PARTY is EXCLUDED under this section shall have no bearing on the PARTY’s participation and membership within the WMP. Any EXCLUDED PARTY or PARTIES’ delinquent amount(s) will be paid consistent Page 7 with the remaining PARTIES’ (including ARCADIA’s) pro-rata share pursuant to the cost sharing formula in Table 2 of Exhibit A, as adjusted to remove the EXCLUDED PARTY from the allocation. ARCADIA is authorized and responsible for revising Table 3 of Exhibit A to show the recalculated costs for each remaining participating PARTY in accordance with this MOA, without requiring amendment to this MOA; the revised exhibits will be included with the next invoice to the remaining PARTIES. The remaining PARTIES shall retain all contractual, legal, and equitable rights and causes of action to recover any delinquent amounts paid that were owed by an EXCLUDED PARTY or PARTIES that failed to make such payments. (f) Interest Accrual. Any interest accrued on the funds collected per this MOA during the term of this MOA shall be refunded or credited toward any amount owed at the time of the final accounting according to the cost sharing formula set forth in Table 2.a of Exhibit A. ARCADIA shall report to the PARTIES the amount of the interest accrued on the collected funds at the time of the final accounting. (g) Excess Funds. Any collected funds not spent in any fiscal year period shall be refunded or credited toward any amount owed by the applicable PARTY at the time of the final accounting according to the cost sharing formula set forth in Table 2.a of Exhibit A. Subject to agreement by ARCADIA, any funds which are to be reimbursed to a PARTY may be reimbursed through credits towards future invoices and agreements, if requested in writing by that PARTY. (h) Consultant’s Access. Each PARTY shall allow the Consultant reasonable access and entry, on an as needed basis, during the term of this MOA to the PARTY’s storm drains, channels, catch basins, and similar properties (“FACILITIES”) to achieve the purposes of this MOA, provided, however, that prior to entering any PARTY's facilities, the Consultant shall secure all necessary permits and provide written notice as required by these permits. (i) Sharing of Information. The PARTIES agree to provide all public records in their possession and available for release to ARCADIA that are deemed necessary by the PARTIES to perform the obligations imposed by this MOA at no cost to ARCADIA. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in this Agreement shall require any PARTY to provide or produce any information and/or documentation that is otherwise privileged, protected or exempt from disclosure under California’s Public Records Act. 7. Indemnification. (a) Except as otherwise provided in this paragraph, each PARTY shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless each other PARTY, including their special districts, elected and appointed officers, employees, agents, attorneys, and designated volunteers from and against any and all liability, including, but not limited to demands, claims, actions, fees, costs, and expenses (including Page 8 reasonable attorney's and expert witness fees), arising from, and in relative proportion to, its own negligence or willful misconduct under this MOA; provided, however, that no PARTY shall indemnify another PARTY for the latter PARTY's own negligence or willful misconduct. (b) The PARTIES agree that any liability borne by or imposed upon any PARTY or PARTIES hereto as a result of the PARTIES’ implementation of this MOA and not as a result of the PARTY or PARTIES own negligence or willful misconduct, shall be fully borne by all the PARTIES in accordance with their percentage share of cost (“LIABILITY PERCENTAGE”), as set forth in the Column “Percent of Area” found in Table 2a of this MOA. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this subsection shall not apply where any liability result(s) from the actions of one or more PARTIES contemplated by subsection 7(a). (c) If any PARTY pays in excess of its LIABILITY PERCENTAGE in satisfaction of any liability borne by or imposed upon any PARTY or PARTIES hereto as a result of the PARTIES’ implementation of this MOA without negligence or willful misconduct, such PARTY shall be entitled to contribution from each of the other PARTIES; provided, however, that the right of contribution is limited to the amount paid in excess of the PARTY 's LIABILITY PERCENTAGE and provided further that no PARTY may be compelled to make contribution beyond its own LIABILITY PERCENTAGE of the entire liability; and provided that no PARTY shall indemnify another PARTY for that other PARTY's own negligence or willful misconduct. (d) To the maximum extent permitted by law, ARCADIA shall require the Consultants retained pursuant to this MOA to agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless each PARTY, their special districts, elected and appointed officers, employees, attorneys, agents, and designated volunteers from and against any and all liability, including, but not limited to demands, claims, actions, fees, costs, and expenses (including attorney and expert fees), arising from or connected with the Consultants' performance under its agreement with ARCADIA which is authorized via this MOA. In addition, ARCADIA shall require the Consultants to carry, maintain, and keep in full force and effect a comprehensive insurance policy or policies, and each PARTY, their elected and appointed officers, employees, attorneys, agents and designated volunteers shall be required to be named as additional insureds on the policy(ies) with respect to liabilities arising out of the Consultants’ work. These requirements will also apply to any subcontractors hired by the Consultant. 8. Early Termination or Withdrawal (a) This MOA may be terminated upon the express written agreement of all PARTIES. If this MOA is terminated, any remaining funds not due and payable or otherwise legally committed to a Consultant(s) shall be distributed to Page 9 the remaining PARTIES (not including any EXCLUDED or WITHDRAWN PARTY or PARTIES, as defined below) so that all such remaining PARTIES have paid no more than their pro-rata share (in accordance with the most current allocation set forth in Exhibit A). Completed work shall be owned by all PARTIES at the time of completion of the work who are not EXCLUDED or WITHDRAWN PARTIES. Similarly, rights to uncompleted work by the Consultant still under contract are to be owned by the PARTY or PARTIES who are not EXCLUDED or WITHDRAWN PARTIES at such time. (b) A PARTY may withdraw from this MOA (“WITHDRAWN PARTY”) upon 60 days written notice to the other PARTIES, subject to payment of any properly issued invoice received from ARCADIA prior to or during the 60-day notice period for its share of the cost of the phase of work, as defined in Exhibit A, Table 1, underway as of the date of its notice of withdrawal, calculated in accordance with the cost sharing formula set forth in Table 2.a of Exhibit A. Table 2.b of Exhibit A shall also be adjusted to maintain consistent treatment of the County’s cost sharing allocation. The effective withdrawal date shall be the sixtieth (60th) day after ARCADIA receives the withdrawing PARTY’s notice to withdraw from this MOA and all required payments have been made. ARCADIA shall refund to the WITHDRAWN PARTY any unused funds paid by the WITHDRAWN PARTY’s effective withdrawal date. All PARTIES understand, acknowledge, and agree that withdrawal from this MOA will terminate any responsibility, liability, or obligation of the WITHDRAWN PARTY under this MOA commencing on the effective withdrawal date. (c) In addition to the foregoing, in the event that the numeric effluent limitations (“NELs”) or NEL-related terms of the PERMIT are invalidated or otherwise declared unlawful or unenforceable by a final and non-appealable judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, all PARTIES retain the right to withdraw from this MOA via written notice to ARCADIA, effective immediately. Should a PARTY withdraw pursuant to this Section 8(c), the withdrawing PARTY shall be liable to reimburse ARCADIA for all of its share of costs incurred pursuant to this MOA, as of the date of that withdrawal. Likewise, ARCADIA shall refund to the WITHDRAWN PARTY any unused funds paid by the WITHDRAWN PARTY’s effective withdrawal date. (d) If any PARTY withdraws from this MOA, the remaining PARTIES’ cost share allocation shall be adjusted consistent with the cost sharing formula in Table 2.a of Exhibit A. Table 2.b of Exhibit A shall also be adjusted to maintain consistent treatment of the County’s cost sharing allocation. 9. General Provisions. (a) Notices. Any notices, bills, invoices, or reports relating to this MOA, and any request, demand, statement, or other communication required or permitted hereunder shall be in writing and shall be delivered to the PARTIES at Page 10 the addresses set forth in Exhibit D attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The PARTIES shall promptly notify each other of any change of contact information, including personnel changes, provided in Exhibit D, which notice serves to amend Exhibit D without requiring a formal amendment to this MOA. Written notice shall include notice delivered via e-mail or fax. A notice shall be deemed to have been received on (a) the date of delivery, if delivered by hand during regular business hours, or by confirmed facsimile or by e-mail; or (b) on the third (3rd) business day following mailing by registered or certified mail (return receipt requested) to the addresses set forth in Exhibit D. (b) Authority. Each of the persons signing below on behalf of a PARTY represents and warrants that he or she is authorized to sign this MOA on behalf of such PARTY. (c) Relationships of the PARTIES. The PARTIES are, and shall at all times remain as to each other, wholly independent entities. No PARTY to this MOA shall have power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of any other PARTY unless expressly provided to the contrary by this MOA. No employee, agent, or officer of a PARTY shall be deemed for any purpose whatsoever to be an agent, employee, or officer of another PARTY. (d) Binding Effect. This MOA shall be binding upon, and shall be to the benefit of the respective successors, heirs, and assigns of each PARTY; provided, however, no PARTY may assign its respective rights or obligations under this MOA without the prior written consent of all of the other PARTIES. (e) Amendment. Except as otherwise provided in this MOA, the terms and provisions of this MOA may not be amended, modified, or waived, except by an instrument in writing signed by all PARTIES that have not withdrawn pursuant to Section 8 or been EXCLUDED by reason of an uncured delinquency of payment. (f) Law to Govern. This MOA is governed by, interpreted under, and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in Los Angeles County. (g) Severability. If any provision of this MOA shall be determined by any court to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable to any extent, the remainder of this MOA shall not be affected, and this MOA shall be construed as if the invalid, illegal, or unenforceable provision had never been contained in this MOA. (h) Entire Agreement. This MOA constitutes the entire agreement of the PARTIES with respect to the subject matter hereof. (i) Waiver. Waiver by any PARTY to this MOA of any term, condition, or covenant of this MOA shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. Waiver by any PARTY to any breach of the provisions of this MOA Page 11 shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision, nor a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this MOA. (j) Counterparts. This MOA may be signed in multiple counterparts with the same force and effect as if all original signatures appeared on one copy; and in the event this MOA is signed in counterparts, each counterpart shall be deemed an original and all of the counterparts shall be deemed to be one agreement. (k) Drafting. All PARTIES have been represented by counsel in the preparation and negotiation of this MOA. Accordingly, this MOA shall be construed according to its fair language. Any ambiguities shall be resolved in a collaborative manner by the PARTIES and shall be rectified by amending this MOA as described in Section 9(e). (l) Impact on WMP. Nothing in this MOA shall be read or interpreted to authorize any PARTY or group of PARTIES to alter the terms of and/or parties to the WMP, as they are entirely separate documents. Specifically, whether a PARTY is considered EXCLUDED or WITHDRAWN as defined in this MOA, shall have no impact on whether the PARTY is still a party to the WMP. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES hereto have caused this MOA to be executed by their duly authorized representatives and affixed as of the date of signature of the PARTIES: [Signatures on following pages] Page 12 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES By MARK PESTRELLA Director of Public Works Date APPROVED AS TO FORM: By MARY C. WICKMAN, County Counsel Date Page 13 CITY OF ARCADIA By NAME, POSITION Date ATTEST: By NAME, City Clerk Date APPROVED AS TO FORM: By NAME, City Attorney Date Page 14 CITY OF BRADBURY By NAME, POSITION Date ATTEST: By NAME, City Clerk Date APPROVED AS TO FORM: By NAME, City Attorney Date Page 15 CITY OF DUARTE By NAME, POSITION Date ATTEST: By NAME, City Clerk Date APPROVED AS TO FORM: By NAME, City Attorney Date Page 16 CITY OF MONROVIA By NAME, POSITION Date ATTEST: By NAME, City Clerk Date APPROVED AS TO FORM: By NAME, City Attorney Date Page 17 CITY OF SIERRA MADRE By NAME, POSITION Date ATTEST: By NAME, City Clerk Date APPROVED AS TO FORM: By NAME, City Attorney Date Page 18 EXHIBIT A Rio Hondo/San Gabriel River Water Quality Group Multi-Benefit Stormwater Project Concept Reports Contributions Table 1. Request for Proposal Task Items Task Items Cost Phase 1 Tasks 1-4 $296,774 Phase 2 Tasks 5-13 $549,980 Phase 3 Tasks 14-19 $776,287 Green street projects developed by County1 $600,000 10% Contingency $162,304.10 Footnote: 1. Parties agree to cost-share the two green street projects already under development by the County Page 19 Table 2a. Cost Sharing Formula Party Acres (Developed Land) Percent of Area(2) Base Fee (1/6th of 10%)(1) Cost based on Acres (90%) Total Cost City of Arcadia 11 34.16% $37,050.68 $683,481.55 $720,532.23 City of Bradbury 1.9 5.90% $37,050.68 $118,055.90 $155,106.59 City of Duarte 3.6 11.18% $37,050.68 $223,684.87 $260,735.55 City of Monrovia 8 24.84% $37,050.68 $497,077.49 $534,128.17 City of Sierra Madre 2.8 8.70% $37,050.68 $173,977.12 $211,027.81 County of Los Angeles 4.9 15.22% $37,050.68 $304,459.96 $341,510.65 Total 32.2 100% $222,304.100 $2,000,736.90 $2,223,041.00 1. Each City’s Base Fee cost share equals 1/6th of 10% of total contracted costs. 2. Based on percent of developed land in each Party area of the total watershed area (excludes Angeles National Forest land) Page 20 Table 2b. Cost Sharing w/ Credit to County Party Total Cost Total Cost Adjusted City of Arcadia $720,532.23 $720,532.23 City of Bradbury $155,106.59 $155,106.59 City of Duarte $260,735.55 $260,735.55 City of Monrovia $534,128.17 $534,128.17 City of Sierra Madre $211,027.81 $211,027.81 County of Los Angeles1 $341,510.65 $0 Total $2,223,041.00 $1,881,530.35 1. County’s $341,510.65 will be credited with the $600,000 spent on developing 2 green street projects. The balance of $258,489.35 may be credited to the County in a future cost-sharing agreement. Page 21 Table 3. Annual Cost-Share / Invoice Amount Cost Formula: A. 10% Base = [(Total Consultant costs) X 10%] /6 parties B. 90% Land Use = [(Total Consultant costs X90%] X Percentage of total land area (not including Angeles National Forest) Multi-Benefit Stormwater Project Feasibility Studies FY 19-20 (Phases 1 & 2) Multi-Benefit Stormwater Project Feasibility Studies FY 20-21 (Phases 3 & 4) Total Costs Arcadia $360,266.12 $360,266.11 $720,532.23 Bradbury $77,553.30 $77,553.29 $155,106.59 Duarte $130,367.78 $130,367.77 $260,735.55 Monrovia $267,064.09 $267,064.08 $534,128.17 Sierra Madre $105,513.91 $105,513.90 $211,027.81 County of Los Angeles $0 $0 $341,510.65* Total $940,765.20 $940,765.15 $2,223,041.00 County’s $341,510.65 will be credited with the $600,000 spent on developing 2 green street projects. The balance of $258,489.35 may be credited to the County in a future cost-sharing agreement. On or before November 30th of each year, the Oversight Committee shall review the Invoicing Schedule may adjust the percent of Cost Share Allocations due each year as deemed necessary for such reasons including, but not limited to, revision in Contracted Costs, Scope of Work, scheduling of work, and/or costs related to environmental review. However, any such adjustment and/or modification shall require approval by the Oversight Committee. EXHIBIT B “REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS” GREEN STREETS INVESTIGATIONS RIO HONDO/SAN GABRIEL RIVER TECHNICAL MEMO – LOCATION 3 PROJECT SCOPE Location: Unincorporated Community of Azusa (TG pages 599-B2, C2) Tributary area: Total area = 41.6 acres, Pipe Flow = 0 acres, Surface Flow = 41.6 acres San Gabriel River Watershed RAA Volume: 4.84 acre-feet Area Jurisdiction – 97.2% within County & 2.8% within the City of Glendora Stormwater Quality Division requested Design Division (DES) to conduct a green street feasibility study for various locations in the Rio Hondo/San Gabriel River watershed. These locations were submitted to Stormwater Engineering Division (SWED) to prepare tributary area maps showing the drainage area for each location. Based on the tributary area for Location 3 provided by SWED (see Attachment 3), DES conducted a field reconnaissance to identify potential locations for Low Impact Development (LID) features (see Attachment 1 for location maps). The following requests were then submitted to the following support divisions to provide necessary information to assess the feasibility of each location. Division Information Requested Date Requested Attachment Construction Preliminary Utility Search June 22, 2017 N/A * Geotechnical & Materials Engineering (GMED) Preliminary Environmental Site Screening (PESS) June 20, 2017 5 Cone Penetration Test (CPT) August 1, 2017 4 *Preliminary Utility Search responses are on file and available upon request. FEASIBILITY REVIEW Review Categories Category Description Subarea References the subarea number in the hydrology map prepared by SWED (see Attachment 3). Subareas are sorted generally from upstream to downstream storm drain flow. ID Number provided to reference individual LID features within one catchment area. PESS ‘X’ indicates potential presence of contaminated soils in this location. Confirmation of this contamination will require the depth range of the proposed LID and additional file reviews from GMED. Utility Search ‘X’ indicates potential conflict with one or more utilities. Due to the margin of error associated with aerial, property line, and utility information, the exact locations of utilities need to be confirmed through potholing. CPT ‘X’ indicates this location may not be suitable for infiltration due to a soil profile consisting primarily of clayey material or a shallow groundwater table. Further subsurface investigation by GMED is warranted to completely exclude the location from onsite infiltration. Biofiltration may still be possible. Feasibility Tier Provides a ranking of proposed locations based on all review categories. No potential issues were found at Tier 1 locations and should be considered priority for further development. Tier 2 locations may have a combination of potential utility and infiltration issues. Tier 3 locations have potential soil contamination and may have additional issues.These are recommended as a last priority. Review Results The below table summarizes DES’s findings for the potential LID locations based on a concept level investigation. Further investigation is required during the Project Design Concept Phase to confirm the impact of the issues on the proposed scope of work. See Attachment 2 for schematic diagrams of the proposed features. Potential Issues Subarea V85th (ac-ft) Cumulative V85th (ac-ft) ID PESS Utility Search CPT Feasibility Tier 1A 0.861 0.861 3-1 1 3-2 1 3-3 1 3-4 1 3-5 1 3-6 1 3-7 1 3-8 1 3A 0.755 1.616 3-9 1 3-10 1 Technical Memo Rio Hondo/San Gabriel River Green Streets Investigations – Location 3 Design Division ATTACHMENT I LOCATION MAPS Technical Memo Rio Hondo/San Gabriel River Green Streets Investigations – Location 3 Design Division ATTACHMENT II LID FEATURE TYPICAL SECTIONS ADJACENT PROPERTY SLOPE 4:1 9'-10" MIN ROAD TYP CURB KEYED HEADER 13' MIN SIDEWALK 14'-6" MIN SWALE W/ OPTIONAL DRY STREAM BED SLOPED BIO-SWALE (RAIN GARDEN) SURFACE TYPE LID INLET SECTION VIEW - AREAS WITHOUT SIDEWALKS AND NO PARKING ADJACENT PROPERTY SLOPE 4:1 ROAD TYP CURB INLET SECTION VIEW - AREAS WITH SIDEWALKS BUT NO PARKING SWALE W/ OPTIONAL DRY STREAM BED SIDEWALK ADJACENT PROPERTY SLOPE 4:1 ROAD STEP OUT STRIP INLET SWALE W/ OPTIONAL DRY STREAM BED SECTION VIEW - AREAS WITH SIDEWALKS AND PARKING 7'-6" MIN 9'-6" MIN ROAD TYP 8" CURB 4" HIGH CURB REQUIRED FOR ADA, W/ CURB CUTS TO ALLOW RUNOFF INTO SWALE SIDEWALK ADJACENT PROPERTY ADJACENT PROPERTY STEP OUT STRIP ROAD SECTION VIEW - AREAS WITH PARKING SECTION VIEW - AREAS WITH NO PARKING 4" HIGH CURB REQUIRED FOR ADA, W/ CURB CUTS TO ALLOW RUNOFF INTO SWALE SIDEWALK PLANTER BOX BIO-SWALE (RAIN GARDEN) SURFACE TYPE LID INLET INLET SWALE SWALE ROAD EDGE RESTRAINTCONCRETE PAVERSBEDDING SAND RESERVOIR AGGREGATES TYP CURB OPTIONAL DRAIN PIPE SECTION VIEW - PERMEABLE PAVERS - SIDEWALK PERMEABLE PAVERS (PAVING) SURFACE TYPE LID 8' MIN PARKING LANE DRIVING LANE OPTIONAL DRAIN PIPE TYP CURB CONCRETE PAVERSBEDDING SAND RESERVOIR AGGREGATES SECTION VIEW - PERMEABLE PAVERS - ROADWAY PARKING LANE 4' MIN SIDEWALK PCC EDGE RESTRAINT ROAD RESERVOIR AGGREGATES TYP CURB SECTION VIEW - PERMEABLE CONCRETE - SIDEWALK PERMEABLE CONCRETE / ASPHALT PAVING SURFACE TYPE LID 8' MIN PARKING LANE DRIVING LANE TYP CURB PERMEABLE CONCRETE, OR PERMEABLE ASPHALT RESERVOIR AGGREGATES SECTION VIEW - PERMEABLE CONCRETE OR ASPHALT - ROADWAY PARKING LANE 4' MIN SIDEWALK PERMEABLE CONCRETE CURBSIDE INFILTRATION UNITS SURFACE TYPE LID PREFABRICATED RIGID, OPEN GRID, STORAGE MODULES WRAPPED IN PERMEABLE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC CURB INLET STRUCTURE W/ SCREENED CURB CUT INLET PIPE W/ SCREEN STEP OUT STRIP, D.G. OR OTHER PERMEABLE PAVING LONGITUDINAL SECTION VIEW ROAD TYP CURB STEP OUT STRIP, D.G. OR OTHER PERMEABLE PAVING CROSS SECTION VIEW PREFABRICATED RIGID, OPEN GRID, STORAGE MODULES WRAPPED IN PERMEABLE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC INFILTRATION STORAGE GALLERY SUBTERRANEAN TYPE LID PLAN VIEW SHOWN AT TYPICAL CUL-DE-SAC PERMEABLE PAVERS OVER INFILTRATION STORAGE GALLERY GRATED INLET SKIMMER BOX OBSERVATION PORT SECTION VIEW TYP CURB AND GUTTER CONCRETE BORDER ROAD STORMWATER STORAGE MODULES STRUCTURAL BACKFILL AGGREGATE BASE CONCRETE BORDER PERMEABLE PAVERS SKIMMER BOX PERMEABLE NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC DRY WELL SUBTERRANEAN TYPE LID INLET - FROM STORM DRAIN OR OTHER SOURCE PRE-TREATMENT AND SEDIMENT SETTLING WELL CONNECTOR PIPE PERFORATED CONCRETE DRY WELL AGGREGATE NATIVE SOIL (DRY WELL TO EXTEND TO WHERE SOILS ARE PERMEABLE) FINISH GRADE MANHOLE COVER MANHOLE COVER SECTION VIEW Technical Memo Rio Hondo/San Gabriel River Green Streets Investigations – Location 3 Design Division ATTACHMENT III HYDROLOGY #0 3A 1A 3 CALERA AV*****FAIRVALLEY AVBARRANCA AVOAKBANK DR WARROW HWY E ARROW HWY W BONITA AV SAN PASQUAL DALERDTRAYMORE AVRANGER DRNBARRANCA AV SAN JOSE SAN JULIAN C A L O R A S T LA CANADALAHABRASAN ANTONIOW LAXFORD ST MILLBURGH AV PROSPERO DR******************** LA County - LARIAC 2014 0 400 800200 Feet ± LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PREPARED BY DATE SCALE 07/17/2017 1" = 400' SM RHSGR GREEN STRRETS LOCATION 3 85th PERCENTILE DESIGN STORM Project Outlet # Existing Drain Subarea Number1A Collection Point Ben Lomond Drain Subarea Boundary LEGEND # Location 3 Total Area: 41.6 acres Total 85th-percentile Q: 5.03 cfs Total 85th-percentile Volume: 1.616 ac-ft Location Total Area (acres) Total Q85th (cfs) 85th-percentile Total Volume (ac-ft) Subarea (acres) Subarea Q85th (cfs) 85th-percentile Subarea Volume (ac-ft) 1A 20.30 2.69 0.861 20.3 2.69 0.861 3A 41.60 5.03 1.616 21.3 2.36 0.755 Technical Memo Rio Hondo/San Gabriel River Green Streets Investigations – Location 3 Design Division ATTACHMENT IV CONE PENETRATION TEST RESULTS Note: Historic high Groundwater Map from Seismic Hazard Zone report for Baldwin Park Quadrangle indicates that historic high groundwater levels are deeper than 200’. A’ 560 550 540 530 520 510 600 590 580 570 560 550 540 530 520 510 600 590 580 570 500 500 A L3-2 L3-1L3-3HAND AUGER to 5’ HAND AUGER to 5’ ML SW, SP SW, SP SW, SP SM SM CROSS SECTION A - A’ Rio Hondo and Upper San Gabriel Feasibility Analysis Location 3 Frontage Road near Arrow Highway, Covina, CA FIGURE 1Drafted by: VKMDate: FEB 2018 Scale: as shown COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS GEOTECHNICAL AND MATERIALS ENGINEERING DIVISION CROSS-SECTION A-A’ | FRONTAGE ROAD NEAR ARROW HIGHWAY LEGEND Cone Penetration Test (CPT) Ground Surface ML Silt SM Silty Sand SW, SP Well-graded or Poorly-graded SandPotential Percolation Zone Defined contact Contact uncertain LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS GEOTECHNICAL AND MATERIALS ENGINEERING DIVISION FIGURE 1Drafted by: VMDate: May 2018 Scale: As Shown GEOLOGY AND SOILS GEOLOGY AND SOILS Groundwater Monitoring Well Locations Locations 3 and 4 Citrus, CA 36,1121: 4288A 4337A 4319AH 4279AD 4348D 4349B 4288A 4337A 4319AH 4279AD 4348D 4349B LEGEND Groundwater Monitoring Well LACDPW SWED Database © Latitude Geographics Group Ltd. WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION 1.14 Miles 0 1.140.57 Miles Location 3 Location 4 Technical Memo Rio Hondo/San Gabriel River Green Streets Investigations – Location 3 Design Division ATTACHMENT V PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL SITE SCREENING RESULTS GREEN STREETS INVESTIGATIONS RIO HONDO/SAN GABRIEL RIVER TECHNICAL MEMO – LOCATION 4 PROJECT SCOPE Location: Unincorporated Community of Azusa (TG pages 569-A7, B7 599-A1, A2, B1) Tributary area: Total area = 169 acres, Pipe Flow = 169 acres, Surface Flow = 0 acres San Gabriel River Watershed RAA Volume: 4.84 acre-feet Area Jurisdiction – 98.5% within County & 1.5% within the City of Azusa Stormwater Quality Division requested Design Division (DES) to conduct a green street feasibility study for various locations in the Rio Hondo/San Gabriel River watershed. These locations were submitted to Stormwater Engineering Division (SWED) to prepare tributary area maps showing the drainage area for each location. Based on the tributary area for Location 4 provided by SWED (see Attachment 3), DES conducted a field reconnaissance to identify potential locations for Low Impact Development (LID) features (see Attachment 1 for location maps). The following requests were then submitted to the following support divisions to provide necessary information to assess the feasibility of each location. Division Information Requested Date Requested Attachment Construction Preliminary Utility Search June 17, 2017 N/A* Geotechnical & Materials Engineering (GMED) Preliminary Environmental Site Screening (PESS) June 20, 2017 5 Cone Penetration Test (CPT) August 1, 2017 4 *Preliminary Utility Search responses are on file and available upon request. FEASIBILITY REVIEW Review Categories Category Description Subarea References the subarea number in the hydrology map prepared by SWED (see Attachment 3). Subareas are sorted generally from upstream to downstream storm drain flow. ID Number provided to reference individual LID features within one catchment area. PESS ‘X’ indicates potential presence of contaminated soils in this location. Confirmation of this contamination will require the depth range of the proposed LID and additional file reviews from GMED. Utility Search ‘X’ indicates potential conflict with one or more utilities. Due to the margin of error associated with aerial, property line, and utility information, the exact locations of utilities need to be confirmed through potholing. CPT ‘X’ indicates this location may not be suitable for infiltration due to a soil profile consisting primarily of clayey material or a shallow CPT groundwater table. Further subsurface investigation by GMED is warranted to completely exclude the location from onsite infiltration. Biofiltration may still be possible. Feasibility Tier Provides a ranking of proposed locations based on all review categories. No potential issues were found at Tier 1 locations and should be considered priority for further development. Tier 2 locations may have a combination of potential utility and infiltration issues. Tier 3 locations have potential soil contamination and may have additional issues.These are recommended as a last priority. Review Results The below table summarizes DES’s findings for the potential LID locations based on a concept level investigation. Further investigation is required during the Project Design Concept Phase to confirm the impact of the issues on the proposed scope of work. See Attachment 2 for schematic diagrams of the proposed features. Potential Issues Subarea V85th (ac-ft) Cumulative V85th (ac-ft) ID PESS Utility Search CPT Feasibility Tier 1A 0.857 0.857 4-13 x 2 3A 1.01 1.867 4-11 1 5A 1.144 3.011 4-7 1 6B 0.416 0.416 4-15 x 2 8B 0.167 0.583 4-14 x 2 10A 0.506 4.1 4-6 1 12A 1.264 5.364 4-1 1 4-2 1 4-3 1 4-4 1 4-5 x 2 4-8 1 4-9 1 4-10 1 4-12 1 Technical Memo Rio Hondo/San Gabriel River Green Streets Investigations – Location 4 Design Division ATTACHMENT I LOCATION MAPS Technical Memo Rio Hondo/San Gabriel River Green Streets Investigations – Location 4 Design Division ATTACHMENT II LID FEATURE TYPICAL SECTIONS ADJACENT PROPERTY SLOPE 4:1 9'-10" MIN ROAD TYP CURB KEYED HEADER 13' MIN SIDEWALK 14'-6" MIN SWALE W/ OPTIONAL DRY STREAM BED SLOPED BIO-SWALE (RAIN GARDEN) SURFACE TYPE LID INLET SECTION VIEW - AREAS WITHOUT SIDEWALKS AND NO PARKING ADJACENT PROPERTY SLOPE 4:1 ROAD TYP CURB INLET SECTION VIEW - AREAS WITH SIDEWALKS BUT NO PARKING SWALE W/ OPTIONAL DRY STREAM BED SIDEWALK ADJACENT PROPERTY SLOPE 4:1 ROAD STEP OUT STRIP INLET SWALE W/ OPTIONAL DRY STREAM BED SECTION VIEW - AREAS WITH SIDEWALKS AND PARKING 7'-6" MIN 9'-6" MIN ROAD TYP 8" CURB 4" HIGH CURB REQUIRED FOR ADA, W/ CURB CUTS TO ALLOW RUNOFF INTO SWALE SIDEWALK ADJACENT PROPERTY ADJACENT PROPERTY STEP OUT STRIP ROAD SECTION VIEW - AREAS WITH PARKING SECTION VIEW - AREAS WITH NO PARKING 4" HIGH CURB REQUIRED FOR ADA, W/ CURB CUTS TO ALLOW RUNOFF INTO SWALE SIDEWALK PLANTER BOX BIO-SWALE (RAIN GARDEN) SURFACE TYPE LID INLET INLET SWALE SWALE ROAD EDGE RESTRAINTCONCRETE PAVERSBEDDING SAND RESERVOIR AGGREGATES TYP CURB OPTIONAL DRAIN PIPE SECTION VIEW - PERMEABLE PAVERS - SIDEWALK PERMEABLE PAVERS (PAVING) SURFACE TYPE LID 8' MIN PARKING LANE DRIVING LANE OPTIONAL DRAIN PIPE TYP CURB CONCRETE PAVERSBEDDING SAND RESERVOIR AGGREGATES SECTION VIEW - PERMEABLE PAVERS - ROADWAY PARKING LANE 4' MIN SIDEWALK PCC EDGE RESTRAINT ROAD RESERVOIR AGGREGATES TYP CURB SECTION VIEW - PERMEABLE CONCRETE - SIDEWALK PERMEABLE CONCRETE / ASPHALT PAVING SURFACE TYPE LID 8' MIN PARKING LANE DRIVING LANE TYP CURB PERMEABLE CONCRETE, OR PERMEABLE ASPHALT RESERVOIR AGGREGATES SECTION VIEW - PERMEABLE CONCRETE OR ASPHALT - ROADWAY PARKING LANE 4' MIN SIDEWALK PERMEABLE CONCRETE CURBSIDE INFILTRATION UNITS SURFACE TYPE LID PREFABRICATED RIGID, OPEN GRID, STORAGE MODULES WRAPPED IN PERMEABLE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC CURB INLET STRUCTURE W/ SCREENED CURB CUT INLET PIPE W/ SCREEN STEP OUT STRIP, D.G. OR OTHER PERMEABLE PAVING LONGITUDINAL SECTION VIEW ROAD TYP CURB STEP OUT STRIP, D.G. OR OTHER PERMEABLE PAVING CROSS SECTION VIEW PREFABRICATED RIGID, OPEN GRID, STORAGE MODULES WRAPPED IN PERMEABLE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC INFILTRATION STORAGE GALLERY SUBTERRANEAN TYPE LID PLAN VIEW SHOWN AT TYPICAL CUL-DE-SAC PERMEABLE PAVERS OVER INFILTRATION STORAGE GALLERY GRATED INLET SKIMMER BOX OBSERVATION PORT SECTION VIEW TYP CURB AND GUTTER CONCRETE BORDER ROAD STORMWATER STORAGE MODULES STRUCTURAL BACKFILL AGGREGATE BASE CONCRETE BORDER PERMEABLE PAVERS SKIMMER BOX PERMEABLE NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC DRY WELL SUBTERRANEAN TYPE LID INLET - FROM STORM DRAIN OR OTHER SOURCE PRE-TREATMENT AND SEDIMENT SETTLING WELL CONNECTOR PIPE PERFORATED CONCRETE DRY WELL AGGREGATE NATIVE SOIL (DRY WELL TO EXTEND TO WHERE SOILS ARE PERMEABLE) FINISH GRADE MANHOLE COVER MANHOLE COVER SECTION VIEW Technical Memo Rio Hondo/San Gabriel River Green Streets Investigations – Location 4 Design Division ATTACHMENT III HYDROLOGY #0 CELESTE ST SCERRITOSAVNCITRUSAVE MAUNA LOA AV SCERRITOSAVE DUELL ST N CITRUSAVS CITRUS AV GRANTLAND DR SCITRUSAVE LAXFORD RD ORKNEY ST CEDARGLENDRE RENWICK RD MASON ST MANNING ST GAILLARD ST VICEROY AV ARMSTEAD ST E GLADSTONE STN ROCKVALE AVNFENIMORE AV E GLADSTONE ST LAXFORD RD EDENFIELDAVE BASE LINE RD VICEROYAVE DUELL ST E PETUNIA ST GLENLYN DR GA L L A R N O D RORANGECREST AVVICEROYAVGLENLYN DR GHENT ST E CASITA ST SRANBURNAVHEATHDALE AVGLENFINNANAVBELLEFONT DR E ALFORD ST ORANGECREST AVORANGECRESTAVE GLADSTONE ST O MALLEY AVEDENFIELD AVFENIMOREAVNFENIMOREAVN FACTOR AVGLENFINNAN AV E RUSSELL ST FONDALE ST EDENFIELDAVARMSTEAD ST ORKNEY STORANGECRESTAVORANGEGLENAVTWINTREEAV GRANTLANDDRN CERRITOS AV CITRUS EDGE ST NEARFIELD ST GAILLARD STRODECKERDRBELLEFONT DR GHENT ST GALATEA ST ARMSTEAD ST E BASE LINE RD FENIMOREAVLARKINDRGRANTLANDDRE 1ST ST E LINFIELD ST PETUNIA ST NROCKVALEAVE DUELL STGHENT ST KIRKWALL RD E LAXFORD RD E PAYSON ST E NEWBURGH ST N CITRUS AV E BASE LINE RD SROSALINDAAVSCOTTAVWOODCR O F T S T ALFORD ST E ALFORD ST GALATEA ST CITRUS EDGE ST NCERRITOSAVNROCKVALEAVE NEWBURGH ST E 2ND ST NEWBURGH ST NEWBURGH ST E RENWICK RD FOOTHILL FRWY NEARFIELD ST E KIRKWALL RDRODECKER DR E 1ST ST ***** MCKINLEY ST FOOTHILL FRWY ***** E 1ST ST MURRAYAVLINFIELD ST E BASE LINE RD O MALLEY AV PAYSON STCEDARGLENDR NVICEROYAVNCALVADOSAVEDENFIELDAVE NEARFIELD ST CITRUS EDGE ST FONDALE ST GAILLARD ST GALATEA ST ***** ***** 4 14A 8B 10A 6B 3A 1A 12A 5A LA County - LARIAC 2014 0 400 800200 Feet ± LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PREPARED BY DATE SCALE 7/17/17 1" = 400' W.T. LEGEND Collection Point #0 Project Outlet Subarea Boundary Existing Drain Subarea Number1A RHSGR GREEN STREETS LOCATION 4 85th-PERCENTILE DESIGN STORM Location 4 Total Area 169 acres Total 85th-percentile Q:20cfs Total 85th-percentile Volume: 6.4 ac-ft Location Total Area (acres) Total Q85th (cfs) 85th-percentile Total Volume (ac-ft) Subarea (acres) Subarea Q85th (cfs) 85th-percentile SubareaVolume (ac-ft) 1A 24.5 2.68 0.857 24.5 2.68 0.857 3A 53.4 5.83 1.867 28.9 3.16 1.010 5A 86.0 9.18 3.011 32.6 3.58 1.144 6B 11.5 1.30 0.416 11.5 1.30 0.416 8B 16.3 1.80 0.583 4.8 0.53 0.167 10A 115.9 12.48 4.100 13.6 1.58 0.506 12A 151.0 16.26 5.364 35.1 3.95 1.264 14A 168.9 18.99 6.371 17.9 3.15 1.007 Technical Memo Rio Hondo/San Gabriel River Green Streets Investigations – Location 4 Design Division ATTACHMENT IV CONE PENETRATION TEST RESULTS Note: Historic high Groundwater Map from Seismic Hazard Zone reports for Baldwin Park Quadrangle indicates that historic high groundwater levels are deeper than 200’ bgs. A’ 530 520 510 500 490 480 580 570 560 550 540 470 A 530 520 510 500 490 480 580 570 560 550 540 470 L4-1 L4-6 Projected 200’ East L4-3 L4-2 L4-4 HAND AUGER to 5’HAND AUGER to 5’ SW, SP SW, SP SW, SP ML ML SM SM CROSS SECTION A - A’ Rio Hondo and Upper San Gabriel Feasibility Analysis Location 4 Near Cerritos Ave, Azusa, CA FIGURE 1Drafted by: VKMDate: FEB 2018 Scale: as shown COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS GEOTECHNICAL AND MATERIALS ENGINEERING DIVISION CROSS-SECTION A-A’ LEGEND Cone Penetration Test (CPT) Ground Surface ML Silt SM Silty Sand SW, SP Well-graded or Poorly-graded SandPotential Percolation Zone Defined contact Contact uncertain Note: Historic high Groundwater Map from Seismic Hazard Zone reports for Baldwin Park Quadrangle indicates historic high groundwater levels are deeper than 200’ bgs. B’ 530 520 510 500 490 480 580 570 560 550 540 470 B 530 520 510 500 490 480 580 570 560 550 540 470 L4-7 Projected 116’ West L4-9 Projected 136’ West L4-8 HAND AUGER to 5’HAND AUGER to 5’ SW, SP SW, SP SW, SP SM SM SM SM SM SM CROSS SECTION B - B’ Rio Hondo and Upper San Gabriel Feasibility Analysis Location 4 Near Rockvale Ave, Azusa, CA FIGURE 1Drafted by: VKMDate: FEB 2018 Scale: as shown COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS GEOTECHNICAL AND MATERIALS ENGINEERING DIVISION CROSS-SECTION B-B’ LEGEND Cone Penetration Test (CPT) Ground Surface ML Silt SM Silty Sand SW, SP Well-graded or Poorly-graded SandPotential Percolation Zone Defined contact Contact uncertain Note: Historic high Groundwater Tables provided by Seismic Hazard Zone reports confirms that historic high groundwater levels are deeper than 200’ bgs. C’ 550 540 530 520 510 500 600 590 580 570 560 490 C 550 540 530 520 510 500 600 590 580 570 560 490 L4-10 L4-11 HAND AUGER to 5’ HAND AUGER to 5’ ML SW, SP CROSS SECTION C - C’ Rio Hondo and Upper San Gabriel Feasibility Analysis Location 4 Gladstone Street, Azusa, CA FIGURE 1Drafted by: VKMDate: FEB 2018 Scale: as shown COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS GEOTECHNICAL AND MATERIALS ENGINEERING DIVISION CROSS-SECTION C-C’ | GLADSTONE ST LEGEND Cone Penetration Test (CPT) Ground Surface ML Silt SM Silty Sand SW, SP Well-graded or Poorly-graded SandPotential Percolation Zone Defined contact Contact uncertain LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS GEOTECHNICAL AND MATERIALS ENGINEERING DIVISION FIGURE 1Drafted by: VMDate: May 2018 Scale: As Shown GEOLOGY AND SOILS GEOLOGY AND SOILS Groundwater Monitoring Well Locations Locations 3 and 4 Citrus, CA 36,1121: 4288A 4337A 4319AH 4279AD 4348D 4349B 4288A 4337A 4319AH 4279AD 4348D 4349B LEGEND Groundwater Monitoring Well LACDPW SWED Database © Latitude Geographics Group Ltd. WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION 1.14 Miles 0 1.140.57 Miles Location 3 Location 4 Technical Memo Rio Hondo/San Gabriel River Green Streets Investigations – Location 4 Design Division ATTACHMENT V PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL SITE SCREENING RESULTS GREEN STREETS INVESTIGATIONS RIO HONDO/SAN GABRIEL RIVER TECHNICAL MEMO – LOCATION 5 PROJECT SCOPE Location: Unincorporated Community of East Pasadena (TG pages 566-H5, H6) Tributary area: Total area = 68.3 acres, Pipe Flow = 61 acres, Surface Flow = 0 acres Rio Hondo Watershed RAA Volume: 4.79 acre-feet Area Jurisdiction – 100% within County Stormwater Quality Division requested Design Division (DES) to conduct a green street feasibility study for various locations in the Rio Hondo/San Gabriel River watershed. These locations were submitted to Stormwater Engineering Division (SWED) to prepare tributary area maps showing the drainage area for each location. Based on the tributary area for Location 5 provided by SWED (see Attachment 3), DES conducted a field reconnaissance to identify potential locations for Low Impact Development (LID) features (see Attachment 1 for location maps). The following requests were then submitted to the following support divisions to provide necessary information to assess the feasibility of each location. Division Information Requested Date Requested Attachment Construction Preliminary Utility Search May 23,2017 N/A* Geotechnical & Materials Engineering (GMED) Preliminary Environmental Site Screening (PESS) June 20, 2017 5 Cone Penetration Test (CPT) August 1, 2017 4 *Preliminary Utility Search responses are on file and available upon request. FEASIBILITY REVIEW Review Categories Category Description Subarea References the subarea number in the hydrology map prepared by SWED (see Attachment 3). Subareas are sorted generally from upstream to downstream storm drain flow. ID Number provided to reference individual LID features within one catchment area. PESS ‘X’ indicates potential presence of contaminated soils in this location. Confirmation of this contamination will require the depth range of the proposed LID and additional file reviews from GMED. Utility Search ‘X’ indicates potential conflict with one or more utilities. Due to the margin of error associated with aerial, property line, and utility information, the exact locations of utilities need to be confirmed through potholing. CPT ‘X’ indicates this location may not be suitable for infiltration due to a soil profile consisting primarily of clayey material or a shallow groundwater table. Further subsurface investigation by GMED is Technical Memo Rio Hondo/San Gabriel River Green Streets Investigations – Location 5 Design Division ATTACHMENT I LOCATION MAPS Technical Memo Rio Hondo/San Gabriel River Green Streets Investigations – Location 5 Design Division ATTACHMENT II LID FEATURE TYPICAL SECTIONS ADJACENT PROPERTY SLOPE 4:1 9'-10" MIN ROAD TYP CURB KEYED HEADER 13' MIN SIDEWALK 14'-6" MIN SWALE W/ OPTIONAL DRY STREAM BED SLOPED BIO-SWALE (RAIN GARDEN) SURFACE TYPE LID INLET SECTION VIEW - AREAS WITHOUT SIDEWALKS AND NO PARKING ADJACENT PROPERTY SLOPE 4:1 ROAD TYP CURB INLET SECTION VIEW - AREAS WITH SIDEWALKS BUT NO PARKING SWALE W/ OPTIONAL DRY STREAM BED SIDEWALK ADJACENT PROPERTY SLOPE 4:1 ROAD STEP OUT STRIP INLET SWALE W/ OPTIONAL DRY STREAM BED SECTION VIEW - AREAS WITH SIDEWALKS AND PARKING 7'-6" MIN 9'-6" MIN ROAD TYP 8" CURB 4" HIGH CURB REQUIRED FOR ADA, W/ CURB CUTS TO ALLOW RUNOFF INTO SWALE SIDEWALK ADJACENT PROPERTY ADJACENT PROPERTY STEP OUT STRIP ROAD SECTION VIEW - AREAS WITH PARKING SECTION VIEW - AREAS WITH NO PARKING 4" HIGH CURB REQUIRED FOR ADA, W/ CURB CUTS TO ALLOW RUNOFF INTO SWALE SIDEWALK PLANTER BOX BIO-SWALE (RAIN GARDEN) SURFACE TYPE LID INLET INLET SWALE SWALE ROAD EDGE RESTRAINTCONCRETE PAVERSBEDDING SAND RESERVOIR AGGREGATES TYP CURB OPTIONAL DRAIN PIPE SECTION VIEW - PERMEABLE PAVERS - SIDEWALK PERMEABLE PAVERS (PAVING) SURFACE TYPE LID 8' MIN PARKING LANE DRIVING LANE OPTIONAL DRAIN PIPE TYP CURB CONCRETE PAVERSBEDDING SAND RESERVOIR AGGREGATES SECTION VIEW - PERMEABLE PAVERS - ROADWAY PARKING LANE 4' MIN SIDEWALK PCC EDGE RESTRAINT ROAD RESERVOIR AGGREGATES TYP CURB SECTION VIEW - PERMEABLE CONCRETE - SIDEWALK PERMEABLE CONCRETE / ASPHALT PAVING SURFACE TYPE LID 8' MIN PARKING LANE DRIVING LANE TYP CURB PERMEABLE CONCRETE, OR PERMEABLE ASPHALT RESERVOIR AGGREGATES SECTION VIEW - PERMEABLE CONCRETE OR ASPHALT - ROADWAY PARKING LANE 4' MIN SIDEWALK PERMEABLE CONCRETE CURBSIDE INFILTRATION UNITS SURFACE TYPE LID PREFABRICATED RIGID, OPEN GRID, STORAGE MODULES WRAPPED IN PERMEABLE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC CURB INLET STRUCTURE W/ SCREENED CURB CUT INLET PIPE W/ SCREEN STEP OUT STRIP, D.G. OR OTHER PERMEABLE PAVING LONGITUDINAL SECTION VIEW ROAD TYP CURB STEP OUT STRIP, D.G. OR OTHER PERMEABLE PAVING CROSS SECTION VIEW PREFABRICATED RIGID, OPEN GRID, STORAGE MODULES WRAPPED IN PERMEABLE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC INFILTRATION STORAGE GALLERY SUBTERRANEAN TYPE LID PLAN VIEW SHOWN AT TYPICAL CUL-DE-SAC PERMEABLE PAVERS OVER INFILTRATION STORAGE GALLERY GRATED INLET SKIMMER BOX OBSERVATION PORT SECTION VIEW TYP CURB AND GUTTER CONCRETE BORDER ROAD STORMWATER STORAGE MODULES STRUCTURAL BACKFILL AGGREGATE BASE CONCRETE BORDER PERMEABLE PAVERS SKIMMER BOX PERMEABLE NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC DRY WELL SUBTERRANEAN TYPE LID INLET - FROM STORM DRAIN OR OTHER SOURCE PRE-TREATMENT AND SEDIMENT SETTLING WELL CONNECTOR PIPE PERFORATED CONCRETE DRY WELL AGGREGATE NATIVE SOIL (DRY WELL TO EXTEND TO WHERE SOILS ARE PERMEABLE) FINISH GRADE MANHOLE COVER MANHOLE COVER SECTION VIEW Technical Memo Rio Hondo/San Gabriel River Green Streets Investigations – Location 4 Design Division ATTACHMENT III HYDROLOGY #0 1A 2A 4A 5*****SMICHILLINDAAVSROSEMEADBLVDMICHIGANBLVDOAKDALE AV H U N T I N G T O N D R D R A K E R D SYCAMORE AV WOODWARDBLVDANITA AV PANORAMA DR RAYMONDDRW H U N T I N G T O N D R LAURITA AV N ALTURARDCOL E AV *****W H U N T I N G T O N D R H U N T I N G T O N D R*************** LA County - LARIAC 2014 LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PREPARED BY DATE SCALE 07/18/2017 1" = 400' SM RHSGR GREEN STREETS LOCATION 5 85th-PERCENTILE DESIGN STORM Project Outlet °# Subarea Number1A Collection Point Existing Drain Subarea Boundary LEGEND #± Location5 Total Area: 68.3 acres Total 85th-percentile Q: 7.84 cfs Total 85th-percentile Volume: 2.510 ac-ft 0 400 800200 Feet Location Total Area (acres) Total Q85th (cfs) 85th-percentile Total Volume (ac-ft) Subarea (acres) Subarea Q85th (cfs) 85th-percentile Subarea Volume (ac-ft) 1A 34.40 3.88 1.240 34.4 3.88 1.240 2A 57.30 6.5 2.079 22.9 2.62 0.839 4A 68.30 7.84 2.510 11.0 1.35 0.431 Technical Memo Rio Hondo/San Gabriel River Green Streets Investigations – Location 4 Design Division ATTACHMENT IV CONE PENETRATION TEST RESULTS Note: Groundwater Measurement on 11/26/2013 provided by Stormwater Engineering Division’s Well Database indicated the water level to be deeper than 100’ bgs. A’ 560 550 540 530 520 510 610 600 590 580 570 500 560 550 540 530 520 510 610 600 590 580 570 500 A L5-1 L5-3 L5-2 SM SW, SP SW, SP HAND AUGER to 5’ HAND AUGER to 5’ SM CROSS SECTION A - A’ Rio Hondo and Upper San Gabriel Feasibility Analysis Location 5 Michigan Blvd., Pasadena, CA FIGURE 1Drafted by: VKMDate: FEB 2018 Scale: as shown COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS GEOTECHNICAL AND MATERIALS ENGINEERING DIVISION CROSS-SECTION A-A’ | MICHIGAN BLVD. LEGEND Cone Penetration Test (CPT) Ground Surface ML Silt SM Silty Sand SW, SP Well-graded or Poorly-graded SandPotential Percolation Zone Defined contact Contact uncertain Note: Groundwater Measurement on 11/26/2013 provided by Stormwater Engineering Division’s Well Database indicated the water level to be deeper than 100’ bgs. B’ 560 550 540 530 520 510 610 600 590 580 570 500 560 550 540 530 520 510 610 600 590 580 570 500 B L5-4 L5-8 L5-9 L5-5 L5-6 L5-7 SW, SP SW, SP HAND AUGER to 5’ HAND AUGER to 5’ SM CROSS SECTION B - B’ Rio Hondo and Upper San Gabriel Feasibility Analysis Location 5 Woodward Blvd., Pasadena, CA FIGURE 1Drafted by: VKMDate: FEB 2018 Scale: as shown COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS GEOTECHNICAL AND MATERIALS ENGINEERING DIVISION CROSS-SECTION B-B’ | WOODWARD BLVD. LEGEND Cone Penetration Test (CPT) Ground Surface ML Silt SM Silty Sand SW, SP Well-graded or Poorly-graded SandPotential Percolation Zone Defined contact Contact uncertain LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS GEOTECHNICAL AND MATERIALS ENGINEERING DIVISION FIGURE 1Drafted by: VMDate: May 2018 Scale: As Shown GEOLOGY AND SOILS GEOLOGY AND SOILS Groundwater Monitoring Well Locations Location 5 Pasadena, CA 36,1121: 9,0281: 4136K 4136A 4136I LEGEND Groundwater Monitoring Well LACDPW SWED Database Location 5 © Latitude Geographics Group Ltd. WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION 0.28 0.280Miles Technical Memo Rio Hondo/San Gabriel River Green Streets Investigations – Location 5 Design Division ATTACHMENT V PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL SITE SCREENING RESULTS MICHILINDA PARK 41.80 ACRES *****MICHIGANBLVDSROSEMEADBLVDH U N T I N G T O N D R SMICHILLINDAAVS O U T H V I E W R D ANITA AV LOCKSLEY DR E CALIFORNIA BLVD JACKSONPLNROSEMEADBLVD********************H U N T I N G T O N D R LA County - LARIAC 2014 ± EXHIBIT C RIO HONDO/SAN GABRIEL RIVER WATERSHED QUALITY GROUP WMP RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES REPRESENTATIVES City of Arcadia 11800 Goldring Rd. Arcadia, CA 91066 Representative: Vanessa Hevener E-mail: vhevener@ArcadiaCA.gov Phone: (626) 254-2712 City of Bradbury 600 Winston Ave. Bradbury, CA 91008 Representative: Kevin Kearney E-mail: KKearney@cityofbradbury.org Phone: (626) 358-3218 City of Duarte 1600 Huntington Drive Duarte, CA 91010 Representative: Amanda Hamilton E-mail: AHamilton@accessduarte.com Phone: (626) 357-7931 City of Monrovia 600 S. Mountain Ave. Monrovia, CA 91016 Representative: Alex Tachiki E-mail: ATachikit@ci.monrovia.ca.us Phone: (626) 932-5553 City of Sierra Madre 232 W. Sierra Madre Blvd Sierra Madre, CA 91024 Representative: James Carlson E-mail: JCarlson@cityofsierramadre.com Phone: (626) 355-7135 ext. 803 County of Los Angeles Los Angeles County Public Works Stormwater Quality Division, 11th Floor 900 South Fremont Avenue Alhambra, CA 91803-1331 Representative: Mark Lombos E-mail: mlombos@dpw.lacounty.gov Phone: (626) 458-7143 Revised 04/13 1 CITY OF ARCADIA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE MULTI-BENEFIT STORMWATTER PROJECT CONCEPT REPORTS FOR THE RIO HONDO/SAN GABRIEL RIVER WATER QUALITY GROUP This Agreement is made and entered into as of ________________, 2020 by and between the City of Arcadia, a municipal corporation organized and operating under the laws of the State of California with its principal place of business at 240 West Huntington Drive, Arcadia, California 91066 (“City”), and Craft Water Engineering, Inc., a California Corporation, with its principal place of business at 10711 Oakbend Drive, San Diego, CA 92131 (hereinafter referred to as “Consultant”). City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to as “Party” and collectively as “Parties” in this Agreement. RECITALS A. City is a public agency of the State of California and is in need of professional services for the following project: Preparation of the Multi-Benefit Stormwater Project Concept Reports for the Rio Hondo/San Gabriel River Water Quality Group (hereinafter referred to as “the Project”). B. Consultant is duly licensed and has the necessary qualifications to provide such services. C. The Parties desire by this Agreement to establish the terms for City to retain Consultant to provide the services described herein. D. A Memorandum of Agreement (“MO A”) was made and entered into by and between the County of Los Angeles, the City, and the Cities of Bradbury, Duarte, Monrovia and Sierra Madre (collectively referred to herein as “MOA Participating Agencies” or individually as “MO A Participating Agency”) on ____________________ regarding the administration and cost sharing for the preparation of the Multi-Benefit Stormwater Project Concept Reports for the Rio Hondo/San Gabriel River Water Quality Group. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. Services. Consultant shall provide the City with the services described in the Scope of Services attached hereto as Exhibit “A.” 2. Compensation. a. Subject to paragraph 2(b) below, the City shall pay for such services in accordance with the Schedule of Charges set forth in Exhibit “B.” b. In no event shall the total amount paid for services rendered by Consultant under this Agreement exceed the sum of ONE MILLION, SIX HUNDRED TWENTY- Revised 04/13 2 THREE THOUSAND, FORTY-ONE DOLLARS AND NO CENTS ($1,623,041.00). This amount is to cover all printing and related costs, and the City will not pay any additional fees for printing expenses. Periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of receipt of an invoice which includes a detailed description of the work performed. Payments to Consultant for work performed will be made on a monthly billing basis. 3. Additional Work. If changes in the work seem merited by Consultant or the City, and informal consultations with the other party indicate that a change is warranted, it shall be processed in the following manner: a letter outlining the changes shall be forwarded to the City by Consultant with a statement of estimated changes in fee or time schedule. An amendment to this Agreement shall be prepared by the City and executed by both Parties before performance of such services, or the City will not be required to pay for the changes in the scope of work. Such amendment shall not render ineffective or invalidate unaffected portions of this Agreement. 4. Maintenance of Records. Books, documents, papers, accounting records, and other evidence pertaining to costs incurred shall be maintained by Consultant and made available at all reasonable times during the contract period and for four (4) years from the date of final payment under the contract for inspection by City. 5. Term. The term of this Agreement shall be for two years from the date of execution, as set forth in Exhibit “C”, unless earlier terminated as provided herein. The Parties may, by mutual, written consent, extend the term of this Agreement if necessary to complete the Project. Consultant shall perform its services in a prompt and timely manner within the term of this Agreement and shall commence performance upon receipt of written notice from the City to proceed (“Notice to Proceed”). The Notice to Proceed shall set forth the date of commencement of work. 6. Delays in Performance. a. Neither City nor Consultant shall be considered in default of this Agreement for delays in performance caused by circumstances beyond the reasonable control of the non- performing party. For purposes of this Agreement, such circumstances include but are not limited to, abnormal weather conditions; floods; earthquakes; fire; epidemics; war; riots and other civil disturbances; strikes, lockouts, work slowdowns, and other labor disturbances; sabotage or judicial restraint. b. Should such circumstances occur, the non-performing party shall, within a reasonable time of being prevented from performing, give written notice to the other party describing the circumstances preventing continued performance and the efforts being made to resume performance of this Agreement. 7. Compliance with Law. a. Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, codes and regulations of the federal, state and local government, including Cal/OSHA requirements. Revised 04/13 3 b. If required, Consultant shall assist the City, as requested, in obtaining and maintaining all permits required of Consultant by federal, state and local regulatory agencies. c. If applicable, Consultant is responsible for all costs of clean up and/ or removal of hazardous and toxic substances spilled as a result of his or her services or operations performed under this Agreement. 8. Standard of Care Consultant’s services will be performed in accordance with generally accepted professional practices and principles and in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions. 9. Assignment and Subconsultant Consultant shall not assign, sublet, or transfer this Agreement or any rights under or interest in this Agreement without the written consent of the City, which may be withheld for any reason. Any attempt to so assign or so transfer without such consent shall be void and without legal effect and shall constitute grounds for termination. Subcontracts, if any, shall contain a provision making them subject to all provisions stipulated in this Agreement. Nothing contained herein shall prevent Consultant from employing independent associates, and subconsultants as Consultant may deem appropriate to assist in the performance of services hereunder. 10. Independent Contractor Consultant is retained as an independent contractor and is not an employee of City. No employee or agent of Consultant shall become an employee of City. The work to be performed shall be in accordance with the work described in this Agreement, subject to such directions and amendments from City as herein provided. 11. Insurance. Consultant shall not commence work for the City until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City it has secured all insurance required under this section. In addition, Consultant shall not allow any subcontractor to commence work on any subcontract until it has secured all insurance required under this section. a. Commercial General Liability (i) The Consultant shall take out and maintain, during the performance of all work under this Agreement, in amounts not less than specified herein, Commercial General Liability Insurance, in a form and with insurance companies acceptable to the City. (ii) Coverage for Commercial General Liability insurance shall be at least as broad as the following: (1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (Occurrence Form CG 00 01) or exact equivalent. (iii) Commercial General Liability Insurance must include coverage for the following: Revised 04/13 4 (1) Bodily Injury and Property Damage (2) Personal Injury/Advertising Injury (3) Premises/Operations Liability (4) Products/Completed Operations Liability (5) Aggregate Limits that Apply per Project (6) Explosion, Collapse and Underground (UCX) exclusion deleted (7) Contractual Liability with respect to this Agreement (8) Property Damage (9) Independent Consultants Coverage (iv) The policy shall contain no endorsements or provisions limiting coverage for (1) contractual liability; (2) cross liability exclusion for claims or suits by one insured against another; (3) products/completed operations liability; or (4) contain any other exclusion contrary to the Agreement. (v) The policy shall give City, its officials, officers, employees, agents and City designated volunteers additional insured status using ISO endorsement forms CG 20 10 10 01 and 20 37 10 01, or endorsements providing the exact same coverage. (vi) The general liability program may utilize either deductibles or provide coverage excess of a self-insured retention, subject to written approval by the City, and provided that such deductibles shall not apply to the City as an additional insured. b. Automobile Liability (i) At all times during the performance of the work under this Agreement, the Consultant shall maintain Automobile Liability Insurance for bodily injury and property damage including coverage for owned, non-owned and hired vehicles, in a form and with insurance companies acceptable to the City. (ii) Coverage for automobile liability insurance shall be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Form Number CA 00 01 covering automobile liability (Coverage Symbol 1, any auto). (iii) The policy shall give City, its officials, officers, employees, agents and City designated volunteers additional insured status. (iv) Subject to written approval by the City, the automobile liability program may utilize deductibles, provided that such deductibles shall not apply to the City as an additional insured, but not a self-insured retention. c. Workers’ Compensation/Employer’s Liability (i) Consultant certifies that he/she is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for workers’ compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and he/she will comply with such provisions before commencing work under this Agreement. Revised 04/13 5 (ii) To the extent Consultant has employees at any time during the term of this Agreement, at all times during the performance of the work under this Agreement, the Consultant shall maintain full compensation insurance for all persons employed directly by him/her to carry out the work contemplated under this Agreement, all in accordance with the “Workers’ Compensation and Insurance Act,” Division IV of the Labor Code of the State of California and any acts amendatory thereof, and Employer’s Liability Coverage in amounts indicated herein. Consultant shall require all subconsultants to obtain and maintain, for the period required by this Agreement, workers’ compensation coverage of the same type and limits as specified in this section. d. Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) At all times during the performance of the work under this Agreement the Consultant shall maintain professional liability or Errors and Omissions insurance appropriate to its profession, in a form and with insurance companies acceptable to the City and in an amount indicated herein. This insurance shall be endorsed to include contractual liability applicable to this Agreement and shall be written on a policy form coverage specifically designed to protect against acts, errors or omissions of the Consultant. “Covered Professional Services” as designated in the policy must specifically include work performed under this Agreement. The policy must “pay on behalf of” the insured and must include a provision establishing the insurer's duty to defend. e. Minimum Policy Limits Required (i) The following insurance limits are required for the Agreement: Combined Single Limit Commercial General Liability $1,000,000 per occurrence/ $2,000,000 aggregate for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage Automobile Liability $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage Employer’s Liability $1,000,000 per occurrence Professional Liability $1,000,000 per claim and aggregate (errors and omissions) (ii) Defense costs shall be payable in addition to the limits. (iii) Requirements of specific coverage or limits contained in this section are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits, or other requirement, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. Any available coverage shall be provided to the parties required to be named as Additional Insured pursuant to this Agreement. f. Evidence Required Prior to execution of the Agreement, the Consultant shall file with the City evidence of insurance from an insurer or insurers certifying to the coverage of all insurance Revised 04/13 6 required herein. Such evidence shall include original copies of the ISO CG 00 01 (or insurer’s equivalent) signed by the insurer’s representative and Certificate of Insurance (Acord Form 25- S or equivalent), together with required endorsements. All evidence of insurance shall be signed by a properly authorized officer, agent, or qualified representative of the insurer and shall certify the names of the insured, any additional insureds, where appropriate, the type and amount of the insurance, the location and operations to which the insurance applies, and the expiration date of such insurance. g. Policy Provisions Required (i) Consultant shall provide the City at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation of any policy required by this Agreement, except that the Consultant shall provide at least ten (10) days prior written notice of cancellation of any such policy due to non-payment of premium. If any of the required coverage is cancelled or expires during the term of this Agreement, the Consultant shall deliver renewal certificate(s) including the General Liability Additional Insured Endorsement to the City at least ten (10) days prior to the effective date of cancellation or expiration. (ii) The Commercial General Liability Policy and Automobile Policy shall each contain a provision stating that Consultant’s policy is primary insurance and that any insurance, self-insurance or other coverage maintained by the City or any named insureds shall not be called upon to contribute to any loss. (iii) The retroactive date (if any) of each policy is to be no later than the effective date of this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain such coverage continuously for a period of at least three years after the completion of the work under this Agreement. Consultant shall purchase a one (1) year extended reporting period A) if the retroactive date is advanced past the effective date of this Agreement; B) if the policy is cancelled or not renewed; or C) if the policy is replaced by another claims-made policy with a retroactive date subsequent to the effective date of this Agreement. (iv) All required insurance coverages, except for the professional liability coverage, shall contain or be endorsed to waiver of subrogation in favor of the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers or shall specifically allow Consultant or others providing insurance evidence in compliance with these specifications to waive their right of recovery prior to a loss. Consultant hereby waives its own right of recovery against City, and shall require similar written express waivers and insurance clauses from each of its subconsultants. (v) The limits set forth herein shall apply separately to each insured against whom claims are made or suits are brought, except with respect to the limits of liability. Further the limits set forth herein shall not be construed to relieve the Consultant from liability in excess of such coverage, nor shall it limit the Consultant’s indemnification obligations to the City and shall not preclude the City from taking such other actions available to the City under other provisions of the Agreement or law. h. Qualifying Insurers (i) All policies required shall be issued by acceptable insurance companies, as determined by the City, which satisfy the following minimum requirements: Revised 04/13 7 (1) Each such policy shall be from a company or companies with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII and admitted to transact in the business of insurance in the State of California, or otherwise allowed to place insurance through surplus line brokers under applicable provisions of the California Insurance Code or any federal law. i. Additional Insurance Provisions (i) The foregoing requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by Consultant, and any approval of said insurance by the City, is not intended to and shall not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, including but not limited to, the provisions concerning indemnification. (ii) If at any time during the life of the Agreement, any policy of insurance required under this Agreement does not comply with these specifications or is canceled and not replaced, City has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary and any premium paid by City will be promptly reimbursed by Consultant or City will withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium from Consultant payments. In the alternative, City may cancel this Agreement. (iii) The City may require the Consultant to provide complete copies of all insurance policies in effect for the duration of the Project. (iv) Neither the City nor any of its officials, officers, employees, agents or volunteers shall be personally responsible for any liability arising under or by virtue of this Agreement. j. Subconsultant Insurance Requirements. Consultant shall not allow any subcontractors or subconsultants to commence work on any subcontract until they have provided evidence satisfactory to the City that they have secured all insurance required under this section. Policies of commercial general liability insurance provided by such subcontractors or subconsultants shall be endorsed to name the City as an additional insured using ISO form CG 20 38 04 13 or an endorsement providing the exact same coverage. If requested by Consultant, City may approve different scopes or minimum limits of insurance for particular subcontractors or subconsultants. 12. Indemnification. a. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall defend (with counsel of City’s choosing), indemnify and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees, volunteers, and agents free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liability, loss, damage or injury of any kind, in law or equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of, pertaining to, or incident to any acts, errors or omissions, or willful misconduct of Consultant, its officials, officers, employees, subcontractors, consultants or agents in connection with the performance of the Consultant’s services, the Project or this Agreement, including without limitation the payment of all damages, expert witness fees and attorney’s fees and other related costs and expenses. Consultant's obligation to indemnify shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by Consultant, the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, or volunteers. Revised 04/13 8 b. To the extent required by Civil Code section 2782.8, which is fully incorporated herein, Consultant’s obligations under the above indemnity shall be limited to claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant, but shall not otherwise be reduced. If Consultant’s obligations to defend, indemnify, and/or hold harmless arise out of Consultant’s performance of “design professional services” (as that term is defined under Civil Code section 2782.8), then upon Consultant obtaining a final adjudication that liability under a claim is caused by the comparative active negligence or willful misconduct of the City, Consultant’s obligations shall be reduced in proportion to the established comparative liability of the City and shall not exceed the Consultant’s proportionate percentage of fault. 13. California Labor Code Requirements. a. Consultant is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Sections 1720 et seq. and 1770 et seq., which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on certain “public works” and “maintenance” projects (“Prevailing Wage Laws”). If the services are being performed as part of an applicable “public works” or “maintenance” project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total compensation is $15,000 or more for maintenance or $25,000 or more for construction, alteration, demolition, installation, or repair, Consultant agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claims, liabilities, costs, penalties or interest arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. It shall be mandatory upon the Consultant and all subconsultants to comply with all California Labor Code provisions, which include but are not limited to prevailing wages (Labor Code Sections 1771, 1774 and 1775), employment of apprentices (Labor Code Section 1777.5), certified payroll records (Labor Code Sections 1771.4 and 1776), hours of labor (Labor Code Sections 1813 and 1815) and debarment of contractors and subcontractors (Labor Code Section 1777.1). b. If the services are being performed as part of an applicable “public works” or “maintenance” project and if the total compensation is $15,000 or more for maintenance or $25,000 or more for construction, alteration, demolition, installation, or repair, then pursuant to Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1, the Consultant and all subconsultants performing such services must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations. Consultant shall maintain registration for the duration of the Project and require the same of any subconsultants, as applicable. This Project may also be subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations. It shall be Consultant’s sole responsibility to comply with all applicable registration and labor compliance requirements. c. This Agreement may also be subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations. It shall be Consultant’s sole responsibility to comply with all applicable registration and labor compliance requirements. Any stop orders issued by the Department of Industrial Relations against Consultant or any subcontractor that affect Consultant’s performance of services, including any delay, shall be Consultant’s sole responsibility. Any delay arising out of or resulting from such stop orders shall be considered Consultant caused delay and shall not be compensable by the City. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of stop orders issued by the Department of Industrial Relations against Consultant or any subcontractor. Revised 04/13 9 14. Verification of Employment Eligibility. By executing this Agreement, Consultant verifies that it fully complies with all requirements and restrictions of state and federal law respecting the employment of undocumented aliens, including, but not limited to, the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, as may be amended from time to time, and shall require all subconsultants and sub- subconsultants to comply with the same. 15. Laws and Venue. This Agreement shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California. If any action is brought to interpret or enforce any term of this Agreement, the action shall be brought in a state or federal court situated in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. 16. Termination or Abandonment a. City has the right to terminate or abandon any portion or all of the work under this Agreement by giving ten (10) calendar days written notice to Consultant. In such event, City shall be immediately given title and possession to all original field notes, drawings and specifications, written reports and other documents produced or developed for that portion of the work completed and/or being abandoned. City shall pay Consultant the reasonable value of services rendered for any portion of the work completed prior to termination. If said termination occurs prior to completion of any task for the Project for which a payment request has not been received, the charge for services performed during such task shall be the reasonable value of such services, based on an amount mutually agreed to by City and Consultant of the portion of such task completed but not paid prior to said termination. City shall not be liable for any costs other than the charges or portions thereof which are specified herein. Consultant shall not be entitled to payment for unperformed services, and shall not be entitled to damages or compensation for termination of work. b. Consultant may terminate its obligation to provide further services under this Agreement upon thirty (30) calendar days’ written notice to City only in the event of substantial failure by City to perform in accordance with the terms of this Agreement through no fault of Consultant. 17. Documents. Except as otherwise provided in “Termination or Abandonment,” above, all original field notes, written reports, Drawings and Specifications and other documents, produced or developed for the Project shall, upon payment in full for the services described in this Agreement, be furnished to and become the property of the City. 18. Organization Consultant shall assign Oliver Galang as Project Manager. The Project Manager shall not be removed from the Project or reassigned without the prior written consent of the City. 19. Limitation of Agreement. This Agreement is limited to and includes only the work included in the Project described above. Revised 04/13 10 20. Notice Any notice or instrument required to be given or delivered by this Agreement may be given or delivered by depositing the same in any United States Post Office, certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, addressed to: CITY: City of Arcadia 240 West Huntington Drive Arcadia, CA 91066 Attn: Vanessa Hevener Environmental Services Officer CONSULTANT: Craft Water Engineering, Inc. 10711 Oakbend Drive San Diego, CA 92131 Attn: Chad Helmle President and CEO and shall be effective upon receipt thereof. 21. Third Party Rights Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to give any rights or benefits to anyone other than the City and the Consultant. 22. Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and that it shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, sex, age or other interests protected by the State or Federal Constitutions. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. 23. Entire Agreement This Agreement, with its exhibits, represents the entire understanding of City and Consultant as to those matters contained herein, and supersedes and cancels any prior or contemporaneous oral or written understanding, promises or representations with respect to those matters covered hereunder. Each party acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements have been made by any person which are not incorporated herein, and that any other agreements shall be void. This Agreement may not be modified or altered except in writing signed by both Parties hereto. This is an integrated Agreement. 24. Severability The unenforceability, invalidity or illegality of any provision(s) of this Agreement shall not render the provisions unenforceable, invalid or illegal. Revised 04/13 11 25. Successors and Assigns This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the successors in interest, executors, administrators and assigns of each party to this Agreement. However, Consultant shall not assign or transfer by operation of law or otherwise any or all of its rights, burdens, duties or obligations without the prior written consent of City. Any attempted assignment without such consent shall be invalid and void. 26. Non-Waiver None of the provisions of this Agreement shall be considered waived by either party, unless such waiver is specifically specified in writing. 27. Time of Essence Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement. 28. City’s Right to Employ Other Consultants City reserves its right to employ other consultants, including engineers, in connection with this Project or other projects. 29. Prohibited Interests Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no director, official, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE] Revised 04/13 12 SIGNATURE PAGE FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ARCADIA AND CRAFT WATER ENGINEERING, INC. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above. CITY OF ARCADIA CRAFT WATER ENGINEERING, INC. By By ____________________________ Dominic Lazzaretto Signature City Manager Date: ______________________ ______________________________ Print Name and Title ATTEST: Date: _________________________ ___________________________ By____________________________ City Clerk Signature APPROVED AS TO FORM: ______________________________ Print Name and Title ___________________________ Date: _________________________ Stephen P. Deitsch City Attorney CONCUR: ______________________________ Tom Tait Public Works Services Department 13 24347.00006\30493020.2 EXHIBIT A Scope of Services for the Preparation of the Multi-Benefit Stormwater Project Concept Reports for the Rio Hondo/San Gabriel River Water Quality Group shall include, but not limited, to the attached “Scope of Work”. Responsible Principal (Chad Helmle, PE)QA/QC Manager (Brad Wardynski, PE)Project Manager (Oliver Galang, PE, ENV SP)Deputy PM/BMP Design Lead (Merrill Taylor, PE)WQ Analysis Lead (Thom Epps, PhD)Drafting (Ruben Martinez)Total Labor Hours Total Labor Effort LACFCD Permit FeesSubcontracts (Tetra Tech)Subcontracts (Michael Baker)Subcontracts (Carollo)Subcontracts (DRP Engrg)Subcontracts (MIG|AHBE)Total Subconsultants2265.00 235.00 245.00 185.00 140.00 130.00 Task 0. Project Management, Coordination, and Meetings Project Schedule - - 9 9 - - 18 3,870 - - - - - - 3,870 Project Coordination 18 36 36 36 - - 126 28,710 - - - - - - 28,710 Meetings (Kick-off, Monthly Stakeholders)- - - - - - - - - Kick-Off Meeting 4 4 4 4 - - 16 3,720 - - - - - - 3,720 Monthly Project Team Meeting (16 months) - - 36 36 - 72 15,480 - - - - - - 15,480 SUBTOTAL Task 0. Project Management, Coordination, and Meetings 22 40 85 85 - - 232 51,780 - - - - - - - 51,780 Task 1. Geotechnical Evaluation - - Arcadia Arboretum - - Field Preparation - - 1 1 - - 2 430 2,000 4,384 4,384 6,814 Field Work - - - 1 - - 1 185 8,223 8,223 8,408 Soils Laboratory - - - 1 - - 1 185 2,490 2,490 2,675 Geotechnical and Seismic Memo - - 1 2 4 - 7 1,175 6,930 6,930 8,105 Rio Hondo Ecosystem Restoration - - Field Preparation - - 1 1 - - 2 430 2,000 4,054 4,054 6,484 Field Work - - - 1 - - 1 185 10,960 10,960 11,145 Soils Laboratory - - - 1 - - 1 185 3,643 3,643 3,828 Geotechnical and Seismic Memo - - 1 2 4 - 7 1,175 6,930 6,930 8,105 Encanto Park - - Field Preparation - - 1 1 - - 2 430 5,297 5,297 5,727 Field Work - - - 1 - - 1 185 9,112 9,112 9,297 Soils Laboratory - - - 1 - - 1 185 2,490 2,490 2,675 Geotechnical and Seismic Memo - - 1 2 4 - 7 1,175 6,930 6,930 8,105 Basin 3E at SFSG - - Field Preparation - - 1 1 - - 2 430 2,000 5,297 5,297 7,727 Field Work - - - 1 - - 1 185 9,112 9,112 9,297 Soils Laboratory - - - 1 - - 1 185 2,490 2,490 2,675 Geotechnical and Seismic Memo - - 1 2 4 - 7 1,175 6,930 6,930 8,105 Green Streets (OPTIONAL - SEE OPTIONAL BID ITEMS) - - - SUBTOTAL Task 1. Geotechnical Evaluation - - 8 20 16 - 44 7,900 6,000 95,271 - - - - 95,271 109,171 Task 2. Preliminary Environmental Site Screening (Phase I ESA)- - Arcadia Arboretum - 1 1 - 2 - 4 760 3,854 3,854 4,614 Rio Hondo Ecosystem Restoration - 1 1 - 2 - 4 760 4,237 4,237 4,997 Encanto Park - 1 1 - 2 - 4 760 3,089 3,089 3,849 Basin 3E at SFSG - 1 1 - 2 - 4 760 3,089 3,089 3,849 SUBTOTAL Task 2. Preliminary Environmental Site Screening (Phase I ESA)- 4 4 - 8 - 16 3,040 - 14,269 - - - - 14,269 17,309 Task 3. Seismic Analysis (Geotechnical)- - Geotechnical Seismic Analysis Report - 1 1 2 2 - 6 1,130 - - 1,130 SUBTOTAL Task 3. Seismic Analysis (Geotechnical)- 1 1 2 2 - 6 1,130 - - - - - - - 1,130 Task 4. Utility Search Utility Search - - 2 8 32 - 42 6,450 4,237 - - - 4,237 10,687 Incorporate into CAD - - 2 8 64 64 138 19,250 3,089 - - - 3,089 22,339 SUBTOTAL Task 4. Utility Search - - 4 16 96 64 180 25,700 - 7,326 - - - - 7,326 33,026 Task 5. Environmental Evaluation/Documentation - - - Environmental Evaluation and Permit Requirements 1 2 8 32 120 - 163 25,415 - - - 25,415 SUBTOTAL Task 5. Environmental Evaluation/Documentation 1 2 8 32 120 - 163 25,415 - - - - - - - 25,415 Billing Rates SUBCONSULTANT COST TOTAL EFFORTFEE PROPOSAL FOR: RH/SGR WQG Multi-Benefit Stormwater Project Concept Reports Contract Type: Fixed Price by Deliverable Develop Feasibility Study and Project Concept Reports (with 30% Designs) for the Rio Hondo San Gabriel River Water Quality Group rWMP Submitted to: City of Arcadia (Attn: Vanessa Hevener) Task Description CRAFTWATER ENGINEERING INC ODCs Responsible Principal (Chad Helmle, PE)QA/QC Manager (Brad Wardynski, PE)Project Manager (Oliver Galang, PE, ENV SP)Deputy PM/BMP Design Lead (Merrill Taylor, PE)WQ Analysis Lead (Thom Epps, PhD)Drafting (Ruben Martinez)Total Labor Hours Total Labor Effort LACFCD Permit FeesSubcontracts (Tetra Tech)Subcontracts (Michael Baker)Subcontracts (Carollo)Subcontracts (DRP Engrg)Subcontracts (MIG|AHBE)Total SubconsultantsSUBCONSULTANT COST TOTAL EFFORTTask Description CRAFTWATER ENGINEERING INC ODCs Task 6. Field Work - - - - - - Site Visit (Drainage Area and existing storm drains/channels)- - - - - - Arcadia Arboretum - - 2 4 4 - 10 1,790 - - - - - 1,790 Rio Hondo Ecosystem Restoration - - 2 4 4 - 10 1,790 - - - - - 1,790 Encanto Park - - 2 4 4 - 10 1,790 - - - - - 1,790 Basin 3E at SFSG - - 2 4 4 - 10 1,790 - - - - - 1,790 Green Streets (Big Dalton and Eaton Wash) - - 4 8 8 - 20 3,580 - - - - - 3,580 SUBTOTAL Task 6. Field Work - - 12 24 24 - 60 10,740 - - - - - - - 10,740 Task 7. Topographic and Seismic Survey - - Topographic Survey, surface, and faults - - Arcadia Arboretum - - 1 2 - - 3 615 - 13,420 13,420 14,035 Rio Hondo Ecosystem Restoration - - 1 2 - - 3 615 - 39,765 39,765 40,380 Encanto Park - - 1 2 - - 3 615 - 9,020 9,020 9,635 Basin 3E at SFSG - - 1 2 - - 3 615 - 16,940 16,940 17,555 Green Streets (Big Dalton and Eaton Wash) - - 1 4 8 16 29 4,185 - - - 4,185 AutoCAD Basemap - - - - Arcadia Arboretum - - 1 2 - - 3 615 - 10,670 10,670 11,285 Rio Hondo Ecosystem Restoration - - 1 2 - - 3 615 - 5,335 5,335 5,950 Encanto Park - - 1 2 - - 3 615 - 5,280 5,280 5,895 Basin 3E at SFSG - - 1 2 - - 3 615 - 7,150 7,150 7,765 Green Streets (Big Dalton and Eaton Wash) - - 1 4 8 80 93 12,505 - - - 12,505 SUBTOTAL Task 7. Topographic and Seismic Survey - - 10 24 16 96 146 21,610 - - 107,580 - - - 107,580 129,190 Task 8. Hydrology - - - Hydrology Study (85th Percentile and SW Capture Potential)- - Arcadia Arboretum - 1 2 12 32 - 47 7,425 - - 7,425 Rio Hondo Ecosystem Restoration - 1 2 12 32 - 47 7,425 - - 7,425 Encanto Park - 1 2 8 24 - 35 5,565 - - 5,565 Basin 3E at SFSG - 1 2 8 24 - 35 5,565 - - 5,565 Green Streets (Big Dalton and Eaton Wash) - 1 2 12 52 - 67 10,225 - - 10,225 SUBTOTAL Task 8. Hydrology - 5 10 52 164 - 231 36,205 - - - - - - - 36,205 Task 9. Community and Stakeholder Outreach - - Outreach Strategy - - 4 4 4 - 12 2,280 - 9,075 9,075 11,355 As-Needed Outreach Activities, OPTIONAL, 4 Events 16 16 16 16 64 14,880 - - 14,880 LACFCD Permit - Conceptual Review - - 8 8 12 - 28 5,120 - - - 5,120 SUBTOTAL Task 9. Community and Stakeholder Outreach 16 16 28 28 16 - 104 22,280 - - - - - 9,075 9,075 31,355 Task 10. Stormwater Capture and Water Quality Analysis - - - - BMP Optimization Analysis (WMMS and SUSTAIN)- - - - Arcadia Arboretum 1 2 8 32 60 - 103 17,015 - - - 17,015 Rio Hondo Ecosystem Restoration 1 2 8 32 60 - 103 17,015 - - - 17,015 Encanto Park 1 2 8 32 60 - 103 17,015 - - - 17,015 Basin 3E at SFSG 1 2 8 32 60 - 103 17,015 - - - 17,015 Green Streets (Big Dalton and Eaton Wash) 1 2 8 32 60 - 103 17,015 - - - 17,015 Stormwater Capture Capacity Options Report - - - - Arcadia Arboretum 1 2 4 20 32 - 59 9,895 - - - 9,895 Rio Hondo Ecosystem Restoration 1 2 4 20 32 - 59 9,895 - - - 9,895 Encanto Park 1 2 4 20 32 - 59 9,895 - - - 9,895 Basin 3E at SFSG 1 2 4 20 32 - 59 9,895 - - - 9,895 Green Streets (Big Dalton and Eaton Wash) 1 2 4 20 32 - 59 9,895 - - - 9,895 SUBTOTAL Task 10. Stormwater Capture and Water Quality Analysis 10 20 60 260 460 - 810 134,550 - - - - - - - 134,550 Task 11. GIS Maps - - - GIS Maps of Projects - - - Arcadia Arboretum - 1 4 8 12 16 41 6,455 - - - 6,455 Responsible Principal (Chad Helmle, PE)QA/QC Manager (Brad Wardynski, PE)Project Manager (Oliver Galang, PE, ENV SP)Deputy PM/BMP Design Lead (Merrill Taylor, PE)WQ Analysis Lead (Thom Epps, PhD)Drafting (Ruben Martinez)Total Labor Hours Total Labor Effort LACFCD Permit FeesSubcontracts (Tetra Tech)Subcontracts (Michael Baker)Subcontracts (Carollo)Subcontracts (DRP Engrg)Subcontracts (MIG|AHBE)Total SubconsultantsSUBCONSULTANT COST TOTAL EFFORTTask Description CRAFTWATER ENGINEERING INC ODCs Rio Hondo Ecosystem Restoration - 1 4 8 12 16 41 6,455 - - - 6,455 Encanto Park - 1 4 8 12 16 41 6,455 - - - 6,455 Basin 3E at SFSG - 1 4 8 12 16 41 6,455 - - - 6,455 Green Streets (Big Dalton and Eaton Wash) - 4 4 8 12 16 44 7,160 - - - 7,160 SUBTOTAL Task 11. GIS Maps - 8 20 40 60 80 208 32,980 - - - - - - - 32,980 Task 12. Water Conservation - - - Water Conservation Potential Analysis - - - Arcadia Arboretum - 1 2 4 16 - 23 3,705 - - - 3,705 Rio Hondo Ecosystem Restoration - 1 2 4 16 - 23 3,705 - - - 3,705 Encanto Park - 1 2 4 16 - 23 3,705 - - - 3,705 Basin 3E at SFSG - 1 2 4 16 - 23 3,705 - - - 3,705 Green Streets (Big Dalton and Eaton Wash) - 1 2 4 16 - 23 3,705 - - - 3,705 Stormwater Harvesting & Reuse Design (OPTIONAL - SEE OPTIONAL BID ITEMS)- - - SUBTOTAL Task 12. Water Conservation - 5 10 20 80 - 115 18,525 - - - - - - - 18,525 Task 13. Feasibility Report - - - - - - Draft Feasibility Report - 8 40 120 280 - 448 73,080 - - - 73,080 SUBTOTAL Task 13. Feasibility Report - 8 40 120 280 - 448 73,080 - - - - - - - 73,080 Task 14. Permits - - - - Regulatory Requirements Report - - Arcadia Arboretum - 1 4 8 32 - 45 7,175 - - 7,175 Rio Hondo Ecosystem Restoration - 1 4 8 32 - 45 7,175 - - 7,175 Encanto Park - 1 4 8 32 - 45 7,175 - - 7,175 Basin 3E at SFSG - 1 4 8 32 - 45 7,175 - - 7,175 SUBTOTAL Task 14. Permits - 4 16 32 128 - 180 28,700 - - - - - - - 28,700 Task 15. Project Cost and Schedule - - - - Project Cost Estimate - - Arcadia Arboretum - 1 4 8 - 13 2,105 - 2,105 Rio Hondo Ecosystem Restoration - 1 4 8 - 13 2,105 - 2,105 Encanto Park - 1 4 8 - 13 2,105 - 2,105 Basin 3E at SFSG - 1 4 8 - 13 2,105 - 2,105 Green Streets (Big Dalton and Eaton Wash) - 1 4 8 - 13 2,105 - 2,105 Project Implementation Schedule - - - Arcadia Arboretum - 1 2 4 8 - 15 2,585 - - 2,585 Rio Hondo Ecosystem Restoration - 1 2 4 8 - 15 2,585 - - 2,585 Encanto Park - 1 2 4 8 - 15 2,585 - - 2,585 Basin 3E at SFSG - 1 2 4 8 - 15 2,585 - - 2,585 Green Streets (Big Dalton and Eaton Wash) - 1 2 4 8 - 15 2,585 - - 2,585 SUBTOTAL Task 15. Project Cost and Schedule - 5 15 40 80 - 140 23,450 - - - - - - - 23,450 Task 16. Safe Clean Water Program (SCWP) Scoring Criteria - - - - - SCWP Scoring and Recommendations - 4 4 16 40 - 64 10,480 - - 10,480 SUBTOTAL Task 16. Safe Clean Water Program (SCWP) Scoring Criteria - 4 4 16 40 - 64 10,480 - - - - - - - 10,480 Task 17. Operation and Maintenance - - - - - Draft O&M Table - - - - - Arcadia Arboretum - 1 2 8 16 - 27 4,445 - - 4,445 Rio Hondo Ecosystem Restoration - 1 2 8 16 - 27 4,445 - - 4,445 Encanto Park - 1 2 8 16 - 27 4,445 - - 4,445 Basin 3E at SFSG - 1 2 8 16 - 27 4,445 - - 4,445 Green Streets (Big Dalton and Eaton Wash) - 1 2 8 16 - 27 4,445 - - 4,445 SUBTOTAL Task 17. Operation and Maintenance - 5 10 40 80 - 135 22,225 - - - - - - - 22,225 Task 18. Monitoring Plan (OPTIONAL - SEE OPTIONAL BID ITEMS) - - - Task 19. Final Deliverable - - Preliminary Concept Report - - - Responsible Principal (Chad Helmle, PE)QA/QC Manager (Brad Wardynski, PE)Project Manager (Oliver Galang, PE, ENV SP)Deputy PM/BMP Design Lead (Merrill Taylor, PE)WQ Analysis Lead (Thom Epps, PhD)Drafting (Ruben Martinez)Total Labor Hours Total Labor Effort LACFCD Permit FeesSubcontracts (Tetra Tech)Subcontracts (Michael Baker)Subcontracts (Carollo)Subcontracts (DRP Engrg)Subcontracts (MIG|AHBE)Total SubconsultantsSUBCONSULTANT COST TOTAL EFFORTTask Description CRAFTWATER ENGINEERING INC ODCs Arcadia Arboretum 1 4 8 80 120 - 213 34,765 - - 34,765 Rio Hondo Ecosystem Restoration 1 4 8 80 120 - 213 34,765 - - 34,765 Encanto Park 1 4 8 80 120 - 213 34,765 - - 34,765 Basin 3E at SFSG 1 4 8 80 120 - 213 34,765 - - 34,765 Green Streets (Big Dalton and Eaton Wash) 1 4 16 160 240 - 421 68,325 - - 68,325 SUBTOTAL Task 19. Final Deliverable (Concept Report)5 20 48 480 720 - 1,273 207,385 - - - - - - - 207,385 30% Design Plans - - Arcadia Arboretum 1 2 13 25 49 98 188 28,145 - - - 28,145 Rio Hondo Ecosystem Restoration 1 2 28 56 111 222 420 62,355 - 20,207 20,207 82,562 Encanto Park 1 2 14 27 54 107 205 30,630 - - 30,630 Basin 3E at SFSG 1 2 11 21 41 81 157 23,585 - - - 23,585 Green Streets (Big Dalton and Eaton Wash) 1 2 41 81 162 324 611 90,565 - - - 90,565 SUBTOTAL Task 19. Final Deliverable (30% Design Plans)5 10 107 210 417 832 1,581 235,280 - - - - 20,207 - 20,207 255,487 LANDSCAPE PLANS (OPTIONAL - SEE OPTIONAL BID ITEMS) GRAND TOTAL 59 157 500 1,541 2,807 1,072 6,136 992,455 6,000 116,866 107,580 - 20,207 9,075 253,728 1,252,183 Responsible Principal (Chad Helmle, PE)QA/QC Manager (Brad Wardynski, PE)Project Manager (Oliver Galang, PE, ENV SP)Deputy PM/BMP Design Lead (Merrill Taylor, PE)WQ Analysis Lead (Thom Epps, PhD)Drafting (Ruben Martinez)Total Labor Hours Total Labor Effort LACFCD Permit FeesSubcontracts (Tetra Tech)Subcontracts (Michael Baker)Subcontracts (Carollo)Subcontracts (DRP Engrg)Subcontracts (MIG|AHBE)Total SubconsultantsTOTAL EFFORT2265.00 235.00 245.00 185.00 140.00 130.00 PHASE 1. FEASIBILITY STUDY (FY 19-20)1,975 - 82,383 - - - - 82,383 84,358 Task 1. Geotechnical Investigation - - Green Streets (Big Dalton and Eaton Wash) - - Field Preparation - - 1 1 - - 2 430 12,452 12,452 12,882 Field Work - - - 1 - - 1 185 35,556 35,556 35,741 Traffic Control - - - 1 - - 1 185 19,250 19,250 19,435 Geotechnical and Seismic Memo - - 1 2 4 - 7 1,175 15,125 15,125 16,300 PHASE 2. FEASIBILITY STUDY (FY 19-20)57,940 - - - - - - - 57,940 Task 12. Water Conservation - - OPTIONAL Stormwater Harvesting and Reuse Design - 4 8 32 128 240 - - Arcadia Arboretum - 1 2 8 32 60 103 14,485 - 14,485 Rio Hondo Ecosystem Restoration - 1 2 8 32 60 103 14,485 - 14,485 Encanto Park - 1 2 8 32 60 103 14,485 - 14,485 Basin 3E at SFSG - 1 2 8 32 60 103 14,485 - 14,485 PHASE 3. PROJECT CONCEPTS W/30% DESIGN (FY 20-21)- - 33,730 - 82,060 - - - 112,770 194,830 228,560 Task 18. Monitoring Plan - - - Monitoring Plan - - - Arcadia Arboretum - - 1 4 - 24 29 4,105 6,765 6,765 10,870 Rio Hondo Ecosystem Restoration - - 1 4 - 24 29 4,105 6,765 6,765 10,870 Encanto Park - - 1 4 - 24 29 4,105 6,765 6,765 10,870 Basin 3E at SFSG - - 1 4 - 24 29 4,105 6,765 6,765 10,870 Monitoring Implementation Sawpit Wash 1 4 24 29 4,105 27,500 27,500 31,605 Arcadia Arboretum - - 1 4 - 24 29 4,105 27,500 27,500 31,605 Task 19. Final Deliverable Landscape Renderings Arcadia Arboretum 2 4 2 8 1,820 16,110 16,110 17,930 Rio Hondo Ecosystem Restoration 2 4 2 8 1,820 32,220 32,220 34,040 Encanto Park 2 4 2 8 1,820 16,110 16,110 17,930 Basin 3E at SFSG 2 4 2 8 1,820 16,110 16,110 17,930 Green Streets (Big Dalton and Eaton Wash) 2 4 2 8 1,820 32,220 32,220 34,040 GRAND TOTAL - 18 44 103 260 624 637 93,645 - 164,443 - - - 112,770 277,213 370,858 TOTAL COST Billing Rates FEE PROPOSAL, OPTIONAL BID ITEMS FOR:RH/SGR WQG Multi-Benefit Stormater Project Concept Reports Contract Type: Fixed Price by Deliverable Develop Feasibility Study and Project Concept Reports (with 30% Designs) for the Rio Hondo San Gabriel River Water Quality Group rWMP Submitted to: City of Arcadia (Attn: Vanessa Hevener) Task Description CRAFTWATER ENGINEERING INC ODCs 14 24347.00006\30493020.2 EXHIBIT B Schedule of Charges/Payments Consultant will invoice City on a monthly cycle. Consultant will include with each invoice a detailed progress report that indicates the amount of budget spent on each task. Consultant will inform City regarding any out-of-scope work being performed by Consultant. This is a time-and- materials contract. Compensation shall be based on time and materials spent in accordance with the following tasks, not to exceed the total compensation listed below. The schedule of prices is attached as attachment “A” to this Exhibit “B”. Preparation of the Multi-Benefit Stormwater Project - $1,623,041.00 Concept Reports for the Rio Hondo/San Gabriel River Water Quality Group Total Compensation: - $1,623,041.00 The total Compensation shall not exceed the total listed without written authorization in accordance with Section 2(b) of this Agreement. (See Attached fee breakdown). 15 24347.00006\30493020.2 EXHIBIT C All work shall be completed in accordance with the following schedule: - Work to be done for two years from the date of execution.