HomeMy WebLinkAbout7312 RESOLUTION NO. 7312
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARCADIA ADOPTING "VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED"
THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE FOR PURPOSES OF
ANALYZING TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS UNDER THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines ("CEQA
Guidelines") encourage public agencies to develop and publish generally applicable
"thresholds of significance" to be used in determining the significance of a project's
environmental effects; and
WHEREAS, CEQA Guidelines section 15064.7(a) defines a threshold of
significance as "an identifiable quantitative, qualitative or performance level of a particular
environmental effect, noncompliance with which means the effect will normally be
determined to be significant by the agency and compliance with which means the effect
normally will be determined to be less than significant"; and
WHEREAS, CEQA Guidelines section 15064.7(b) requires that thresholds of
significance must be adopted by ordinance, resolution, rule, or regulations, developed
through a public review process, and be supported by substantial evidence; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15064.7(c), when adopting
thresholds of significance, a public agency may consider thresholds of significance
adopted or recommended by other public agencies provided that the decision of the
agency is supported by substantial evidence; and
WHEREAS, Senate Bill 743, enacted in 2013 and codified in Public Resources
Code section 21099, required changes to the CEQA Guidelines regarding the criteria for
determining the significance of transportation impacts of projects; and
1
WHEREAS, in 2018, the Governor's Office of Planning and Research ("OPR")
proposed, and the California Natural Resources Agency certified and adopted, new
CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3 that identifies vehicle miles traveled ("VMT") —
meaning the amount and distance of automobile travel attributable to a project — as the
most appropriate metric to evaluate a project's transportation impacts; and
WHEREAS, as a result, automobile delay, as measured by "level of service" and
other similar metrics, generally no longer constitutes a significant environmental effect
under CEQA; and
WHEREAS, the City's project review process will retain "level of service" analysis
to ensure consistency with the General Plan and compliance with the City's traffic impact
fee program; and
WHEREAS, CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3 goes into effect on July 1, 2020,
though public agencies may elect to be governed by this section immediately; and
WHEREAS, the City of ARCADIA, following a public review process consisting of
a staff presentation before the City Council, wishes to adopt the VMT thresholds of
significance for determining the significance of transportation impacts.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA,
CALIFORNIA, DOES FIND, DETERMINE AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City of Arcadia hereby adopts the VMT thresholds of
significance attached as Exhibit A.
SECTION 2. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its
adoption by the City Council and the Clerk of the Council shall attest to and certify the
vote adopting this Resolution.
2
Passed, approved and adopted this 16th day of June, 2020.
Mayoe City of Arcadia
ATTEST:
e /
tom` Clerk 411
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Stephen P. Deitsch
City Attorney
3
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS:
CITY OF ARCADIA )
I, GENE GLASCO, City Clerk of the City of Arcadia, hereby certifies that the
foregoing Resolution No. 7312 was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of
Arcadia, signed by the Mayor and attested to by the City Clerk at a regular meeting of said
Council held on the 16th day of June, 2020 and that said Resolution was adopted by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Beck, Cheng, Verlato, Tay, and Chandler
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Clerk of City of Arcadia
4
City of Arcadia Significance Thresholds for
Transportation
Consistent with State CEQA guidelines section 15064.3, the City of Arcadia has
adopted the thresholds of significance set forth in Table 1 to guide in determining
when a project will have a significant transportation impact.
Table 1
Vehicle Miles Traveled VMT Impact Thresholds
Project Type Thresholds
Land Use Plan 1) Project Impact: A significant impact would occur if the
VMT rate for the plan would exceed a level of 15%
below the applicable baseline VMT rate.
2) Project Effect: A significant impact would occur if the
project increases total regional VMT compared to
cumulative no project conditions.
Land Use Project 1) Project Impact: A significant impact would occur if the
VMT rate for the project would exceed a level of 15%
below the applicable baseline VMT rate.
2) Project Effect: A significant impact would occur if the
project increases total regional VMT compared to
baseline conditions.
Retail Project 1) Project Impact: A significant impact would occur if the
VMT rate for the project would exceed a level of 15%
below the applicable baseline VMT.
2) Project Effect: A significant impact would occur if the
project increases total VMT in the study area compared
to baseline conditions.
Transportation Project A significant impact would occur if the project causes a net
increase in total regional VMT compared to baseline conditions,
opening year no project conditions, or cumulative no project
conditions.
All land use and A significant impact would occur if the project is inconsistent with
transportation projects the RTP/SCS.
Note:
1. VMT to be reported as VMT per Service Population, VMT per capita, or VMT per employee.
2. The Baseline VMT rate is defined as the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments
Northwest Sub-Region per applicable service population.