Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutJANUARY 25, 1994 , "'yJi . . Planning Commission proceedings are tape recorded and on file in the office of the Planning Division. MINUTES ARCADIA CITY PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING Tuesday, January 25, 1994 The Planning Comn\jssion of the City of Arcadia met in. regular session on Tuesday, January 25, 1994 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Arcadia Oty Hall, 240 West Huntington Drive, with Chairman Tom Clark presiding. PLEOCE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: PRESENT, ABSENT: Commissioners, Daggett, Hedlund, Huang, Kovacic, Oark None - MINUTES It was moved by Commissioner Daggett, seconded by Commissioner Hedlund to approve the minutes as corrected of January 11..1994. The motion passed by voice vote with none dissenting. OTHERS A TIENDING: Assistant Community oeveiopmentDirector-Planning Donna Butler Secretary Cheryl Lopez City Attorney Mike Miller Council Uason Dennis Lojeski PUBLIC HEARINGTPM 93-005 232 and 300 E. Live Oak-Ave. Marketplace Properties Request to subdivide an existing 192,276 square foot commercial lot into two lots. Parcell will contain 20,242 square feerandParcel2 will contain 172,034 square feet The staff report was presented. MOTION It was moved by Commissilmer Hedlund, seconded by Commissioner Kovacic to continue this public hearing until after Public Hearing CUP 9~is heard. The. motion passed by voice vote with none dissenting. ' PUBLIC HEARING CUP93-D08 232 and 300 E. Live Oak.A ve. Marketplace Properties Request fora Conditional Use Pennit to Cf?nstruct a 50,547 square foot Albertson's market within 100 feet of residentially zoned property and a 5,934 square foot multi- tenant building (2.800Sq. ft. ofthe retail space may be utilized for a restaurant with outdoor seating). The Arcadia City. Planning Commission 1/25/94 Page 1 . . .J . \ . ~ applicant. is also requesting the following as part of the application: 1. To operate the market 24 hours a day. 2. To selll!lcoholic beverages within 150 feet' of residentially zoned property. . 3. To provide 266 parking spaces in lieu of 296 spaces reqUired. 4. To have an 8'-0" setliackfor the proposed market along Lynrose Avenue in lieu ofSO'-o",required per City Council Resolution 3180 (dated November 3, 1959). The staff report was presented. The Staff indicated they received two letters in opposition to the project from Peggy Ulbrich, 2401 S. Third Ave., and from Ric~d &: ~rances Rabolini, 2515 S. Fourth Ave. DISCUSSION Commissioner Hedlund.askedif what they have before them is what the traffic engineers recommended. Donna Butler replied no, the plans before,them;showa wall that extends easterly from the property line to the first driveway out to Live Oak Ave, The traffic consultant suggested a driveway approJdmatly where the loading area is located allowing trucks to enter the loading area directly from Live Oak. Discussed this proposal with the Public Works Department,and we feel there could be problems with. trucks crossing Live Oak,at an unsignalized intersection. Also we feeUt could create a confIictwjth both eastbound and westbound traffic on Live Oak Ave. The purpose of the solid wall was to reduce the visibility and the noise from the loading area.. Commissioner Hedlund had concern regarding how large semi-trucks could get out of the loading area, Ms, Butler said would exit onto Tyler. Commissioner Kovacic asked about condition number seven that talks about the hours that delivery is prohibited and wanted to know if there was a reason that peak hours were not induded as a condition. Ms. Butler replied no. Commissioner Kovacic ,asked ablJut condition number ten, the Police department's.recommendation concerning the fencing, but they did not address. the issue of lighting. Kovacic asked if there was a coder'equirement that will take care of that or is lighting something we should address to the Commission. Ms. Butler replied that 20'-0" highlights are proposed in,the parking area. The lights are required to be screened and directed away fro adjoining streets and property, ' Commissioner Daggett asked about operating 24 hOUrs a day, does that mean they will be selling liquor 24 hours a day, Another concern was the 2 pylon signs. Ms. Butler said the applicant could address the !ialeof liquor. In regards to the pylon.sip, they are conceptual in nature. The signs on Tyler dOes not meet ourvehiculai visibility requirement. The signs will have to be approved by the Planning Division. Arcadia City Planning Commission 1/25/94 Page 2 .' '\. 1 . . Commissioner Daggett also asked the distance between the east side of the, new proposed building and the exisisling building for the electrical and power line easement. He was concerned if there will be enough room for pedeStrian usage. Ms. Butler replied that there is a space there, but it is for easement use only. The public hearing' was opened. In Favor Michael Rue, President ofcMarkelplace Properties, 13522 Newport Ave" Ste. 202, Tustin, CA, 92680, stated that before they even approached the City with their project they approached the neighbors in the vicinity of the property and asked for their input on the project. October 21, 1993 wa.s the first meeting at a local Church on Lynrose and there were'approximately 100 people in attendance. At the meeting we made a presentation of the project and there were many comments both positive and negative. Those present Were asked to fill out a questionaire; 70.4% indicated they were in favor of the layout; 77.8% were in, favor of the building design; 68.5% were.in favor of the projeCt. The'second meeting was held at the Arcadia, Monrovia, Duarte Town Council on November 16, 1993, this meeting was not as heavily attended. On the conditions we would Hke number 7 to be modified slightly to allow delivery to starht 6:00 a.m. in lieu of7:OO a.m. so that we can get those trucks in on,non.peakhours, Albertonswill have approximatley 15 semi-trucks a week; usually a maximum.of 2 in any on day. Landscaping ' will be planted on the east side of the building: there will not be a wall; we are trying to.avoid a situation were people might,congegate and want to keep it open so that if the police drive down they can see all the activity going on behind this building as well as the side of the building. There will be no walls on the south side of the building; there will be landscaping. The building to the east will cover up about half of the back oHhis building. There are 10 exsisting mature ficus trees along the south side of the property and they were proposing. to plant more trees. Commissioner Oark asked Mr. Rue what they were proposing in addition to the treeson the south. side of the structure and adjacent to the .parking lot, Mr, Rue replied, since the original design the building has been reduced a foot and a half in height. The second thing we did to soften the wall was to propose a 4 foot retaining wall adjacent to the the property line a.nd plant a landscape berm adjacent to the southerly market wall. Commissioner Kovacic asked what Mr. Rue felt ~boutthe delivery layout, arufif he felt there was a better design, Kovacideltil is .an, awkward way to deliver groceries. Mr. Rue,repHed'that this is notan unusual design when you have a fairly tight piece of property adjacent to residential. We could have pulled the building ,forward and put the loading dock.in the'rear and basically had the trucks circling the building to get out, but the noise created from that would be undesirable. This . proposal is not .000rJii'st choice for delivery, but it works. The primary reason for this proposal is to keep the trucks and noise as far away from residential as possible. Commissioner Kovadcasked about delivery hours and.avoiding peak hours. He wanted to know if,Mr. Rue was requesting an open window from 6:00 a.m. tolD p.m. and. wanted to know if there were any hours in that time frame that he could safely avoid. Mr. Rue felt thatMr, Derrick could speak to that question better. Arcadia City Planning Commission 1/25/94 Page 3 . . .1 . ,. \ Jay Nelson, Linscott, Law & Greenspan Engineers, 1580.Corporate Dr., Ste. 122, Costa Mesa, CA, stated that his firm prepared the traffic study, What they have done has been outlined in the staff report, traffic impacts at3 key'intersections, they also have done exsisting,moming and evening peak hour countsafthose locations. They added additional traffic growth. to the existing conditions and then, added the projections for, the traffic at the completion of the center. ,Based on the traffic and parking analysis'Weco!,c1uded there would not beasignificant traffic impact at those intersections. In acldition a lot of the.traffic that wiUbe entering the center is existing traffic from the neighborhood. 'CommissionerClark.asked Mr. Nelson ,approximately how much will the traffic increase? Mr. Nelson indicated the increase 'in' traffic volume from the project will be 115 trips in the morning peak hours. 75 of thoSe willbe'inbound, 40 outbound witha,total of 115 trips. The peakhours are from 7-9:00 a.m: A little over a car and a half per ,minute. In theevening'hours it will be 450 based,on the standard traffic generation rates. This is based on 3 key intersection, the. level of service which is. rated; on a scale of A through F, and those level of services are not expected to change. Commissioner Ciark asked about theintersection'of Third and Live Oak, right and left turns on to Live Oak from Third. Mr. Nelson replied that the right turns are not thatdifficull; hOWever, the left turns are difficult The project is actuallyamovement.from Thir~,Streetaway from the project, so this movement will not be increased by this. project. .It is an exsisting condition. Thevolumes were low enough on ThirdSt. that it does not warrant a traffle signal. Commissioner Kovacic asked.ifthis.plan is the optimum,way to circulate traffic or would you have other driveways located on the site. Mr..Nelson replied thatstrict1y from a.traffic standpoint they would like to see a driveway to serve the loading area by itself,so trucks don:rhave to circulate through the site. Jeff Dierck, Albertson's Senior Real Estate Representative for the Los Angeles County area, 1180 W, Lambert Rd., Brea, CA, noted Albertson's will be restricted by the ABC (Alcoholic Beverage Control). The latest alcohol can be sold is 2:00 a:m., and in some cases the ABC will restrict a marketto 12:00 p.m. Alberton'swill have a problelTl restricting the deliveries between 11:00 a.m. to 2:QO p.m, They would be glad to deliver between 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a,m. The reason' they punn a sound wall along Live Oakw!,ssoyou would not hear noise from the trash compactor and trucks. They.also believe that the mostexpedient way to deliver groceries is an additional ,break in the wall; however, they have reviewed the situation with our trucldng'department and they feel 1 00% ,comfortable with the proposed design. Commissioner Clark asked what they would,anticipate the delivery hours to be given the hours recommended by staff. Mr. Dierck replied 6:00 a.m. to 7:30 a.m. and'7:3O p.m. to 10:00 p.m. ComlT\issioner Oark asked what are. the peak shopping hours. Mr. Dierck replied 4:00 p,m. to 7:00 p.m. Sy Perkowitz, Architect, 911 Studebaker Rd., Long Beach, CA,specializesin neighborhood shopping centers. The layo\Jt of the shopping center is functional. They have bee'l,sensitive to the residential area; the center was designed with a residential appearance. It has a soft look, it wiIllook)ike pari of the community, Arcadia City'Planning.Commission 1/25/94 Page 4 , , '\. . . 'j . Carolyn Fiegler, 11159 Daines Dr., Arcadia, member of the Monrovia, Arcadia, Duarte Town Council, she had six residents in the direct vicinity of the proposed market that called her expressing approval to the new project resulting from the meeting held by Mr. Rue. Two of them'reported that they are elderlyand handicap and they feel that they would greatly benefit from the market. From her own view and the view from the south ,Arcadian's, in the County area she feels it will greatly benefit them, but would like dial-a-ride to provide transportation to the markets that the County part of Arcadia also spends their money and shops at. Also for the,breaks in the wall she hoped that there would be something besides wrought iron that will be used. In Opposition Ted Parker. 25005. Third, Arcadia,.felt he got the information quite late. He had concerns with traffic on Third Ave. He felt that cars exiting on Live Oak from the market will turn up Third St. to go north. Hefelt the traffic study had no regard for the residential streets. He is concerned that cars will chose to go out Live Oak, becauseTyler is already so congested. He also .fears the, traffic on Third will make it imposible for him to get out of his driveway. Mr. Parker is concerned with .potential traffic backup on Second and Longden, which will require a signal. In the Police report it states that if there is any increase in traffic which Mr, Parker said there will certainly be an increase,' there is a potential traffic problem for bicylist, vehicles and or pedestrians, He further states that in the. report the police were going to try'to'mitigate this, mitigate means to lessen. not mean to eliminate. Mr, Parker feels the study should be done with more intersections and streets. The report ~ouldbe more meaningful if it included Second.and Longden, Third and Longden, Fourth and Longden, Third and Live Oak, Fourth and Live Oak, Sixth and Live Oak'and,even Santa Anita and Live Oak. Commissioner Kovacic,aske<tMr, Parker what other type of use would he suggest for this property. Mr; Parker.replied he. envisioned a school. Andrew Bobb. 1.1104 E. LynroseSt,. Arcadia.was concerned with the traffic generated on Lynrose, cars use that street to get to. Santa Anita.and they ha'(e already had several accidents on that street. Tyler is like a freeway already and he is afraid the:additional traffic will make'it even more dangerous for young children crossing the street. He is alSo,concerned about the alleys that run behind,those street will, generate more traffic. Itwas mentioned that Albertson's is the only supermarket in t~t area, tlus is not.true .there is a Ralph's. He doesn't feel the,neighborhood can support21arge supeimarket's in this,area. Suggested the property be turned into a park. Jerome JenSen. 5639 Cochin Ave., Arcadia. feels that the easement behind thestore.will.breedtransients,he is concerned with the property values and impact. He feels the vine. and ivy idea to soften the building is a bad idea because it breeds rodents. His other concern deals with graffiti, right now it is nota problem but feels it will become a problem. Finally everyone he has taIked to is negative, not positive about this project. Dan Verstuya, 5638 Cochin Ave., Arcadia, was concernedwith,traffic on Lynrose and Fama. He is concerned with cars parking on Lynrose and would like a red CUrb on Lynrose. He suggestedlhe design of the building would look more residential if they started al'lO'-o" and increasing gradually withslope<hoof. Alex Vag(), 5619 Marshburn Ave:, Arcadia,.said he personally is not opposed because he does not have an altematiUdea, howev'erhe would prefer a business that.had hours from 8:00 a.m., to 5 :00 p.m. He suggested four way stop. signs along all of the intersections. Also, he,is very concerned with rodents andcockioaches. He also wanted to know what kind of extra protection would be provided for the residents that live in the county area. Arcadia City Planriing Commission 1/25/94 Page 5 . . J ' 1,: Patricia Ames, 2222S, Secend, Arcadia, also agrees with the traffic cencerns. She feels this area .is basically a residential area and does !leUeel a supermarket will de well. She,is <!lso concerned with putting industrial lights en the site and the neise preblems, She feelnhe preject sheuld be scratched. Terry Edgingten,.2413 S. Third Ave.,}\rcadia, is also cencerned with safety .of ehildren.and,thetraffic. She suggested sidewalks and speed bumps en Third Ave. Sylvia Hem, 2525.S, Secend Ave., Arcadia, spoke against the project, and Albertson's. She is veryccncerned with traffic and ne sidewalks. She feels that the children are net safe with the new proposal at:ld the traffic that t~is will. generate. She feels that Albertsen's is geing te fail. She deesncffeel there'is a need fer twe supennarkets in the area. Ces Sawer, 5628 Marshburn Ave., Arcadia, shared his concern .over the traffic .on Tyler, he doesnctfeel that Tyler can handle the traffic that. this prcjectwi1\ generate. Rebert Lucas, 5639 N,.Farna Ave., Arcadia, lives,6n the south/west comer ef,Farna and LynreSe. The preperty accress the street has always been a bone bf centention, He is concerned wilit the traffic en Farna and ~intenance .of the area, and the pedestrian access en Lynrose. He fears it will result in parking en Lynrese Ave. He is alse ce!,cerned with d17liveries and trash pick-up. As far as the preject is concerned he is not tatally against it. HeJears that Albertan's will natlive up ta the .ordinances. Leuise Parker, 2500 S. Third, attended .one .of the Albertson's meetings and theught it was a nice design. One thing they have,necentrel ever is the traffic which. makes it an undesirable preject. The traffic this project will generate will create,majer problems in the residential area. They werenatgiven preper neticeand net eneugh time tegetmare neighbors tegether. She feels that fer the sake .of publicrelatiorui more people sheuld be netified,.andde mere than what isJegally required. She feels that net only will the property values'ge dewn but she feels that insurance rates will ge up. AI Brandveld, 2411 Third Ave., Arcadia, is very cencerned with traffic. The speed .of the traffic is between 35 ta SO. mph. He is concerned with the trashthatthis preject may create an the streets, already frem. the 7-11 he finds empty beer bettles on the street, wrappers, etc. Raymand Kettle, 5673 Heddart, Arcadia, was very cencerned with the lighting and the effect on the residences. Dale Edgingten, 2413 S. Third Ave" Arcadia, feels this project is poorly designed. The architect even said that this is a very difficult site for a grocery stere, becauSE! .of the building locatian, traffic, etc. This property is best used fora limited cemmercial use with ne constant traffic problems. Sverana Malabanan, 5757 W, Century Blvd., Ste. 80S, Las Angeles, representative .of 7-11, is netfer.ar against the preject.The .owner is'in Hang Keng. Roland E, 'Hill, 2530,Feurth Ave., Arcadia, is concerned with mere traffic en Faurth Ave. as a result .of the market. During 7:00 a,m, and 9:00 a;m, there iu let .of ",est bound ' traffic en Live Oak Ave; In the evening between the heurs .013:30 p.m. and 6:30 p.m, thereis heavy traffic east bound. Heis cancerned with accesSibility. He feels alight manufacturing busineSs with !lermal business heurs we\lld be nice and weuld provide jebs in the area. Can\missiener Oarkasked if there ""as anyene else te'speak in eppositien .of the prejeCt Hearing nene he allewed the applicant an eppartunity fe....<ebuttal. Mr, Rue said thalin reference,te the wreughtiron fencing he wauld be wi1\ing te take suggestiens and de what the people wanted. as leng as the visibility dees net become a 'problem for the pelice. Arcadia City Planning Cemmjssicn 1/25/94 Page 6 "j. \. . . On the issue of the parking along Lynrose, if it is the City or County's wish. to eliminat.e parking on Lynrose he would have no problem with that. With respecuo the traffic problem, most of it is already exsisting condition, This is a covenience oriented use. It is not designed to.attract people outside of a 1 to 1 1/2 mile radius of the site, The traffic should be viewed as noi more but reallocated. As far as appropriate uses for the,property, it has been his experience that it is very unusual to have light maimfacturing in residential areas. It is overwhelming the number of retail uses on Live Oak. MOTION [t was moved by Commissioner Daggett, seconded by Commissioner Huang to close the public hearing. motion passed by voice vote with none dissenting. The -' DISCUSSION Commissioner Kovacic asked Donna Butler from'a planning perspective how do you differentiate a C~M from a C-2. Donna Butler replied that a .C-M zone allows light maunfacturing uses, as well as commercial,'retail and office uses. The C-2 zone is for commercial use only and dOes not allow light manufacturing, Commissioner Huang wanted to make a 'comment about the problem with the,sitting of the retail buildings. He feels Live Oak is'similar to Huntington Dr., he feels that the buildings should sit on the property line. The way the project!is sitting in his opinion does not contribute to the street character. Commissioner. Kovacic tried to picture in his mind.if there are similar supennarket.properties,; he noted Ralphs and a Vons on Second and Foothill, Von's PavilIions on Baldwin and Golden West, Hughes at Huniington and. Sunset, so in detennining if this is a unique case, it is not. He asked Donna ButleriHhethinks Ralphs on second would be sitnilar. Donna Butler said yes, and also the Alpha Beta on Duarte and Second would be similar; it also is adjacent to residential. Commissioner Kova~ic asked if Donna,was aware.of any complaints from the residents near the Alpha Beta due tothesupennarket. Donna Butler replied she was not aware of any. Commissioner Clark expressed some concern over the potential traffic, however, he also feels that there is a. lot of conjecture as to the actual impact the project will have on traffic. He doesn't feel that Second, Third and Fourth Ave, will be turned into a freeway either.He,did not think.there would,be that many people; and felt AlbertsOn's will bea good neighbor, Commissioner Hedlund thoughUhe market would be a good addition to the neighborhood. He expressed concern with traffic, parking and circulation. He would like to see the parking confined to the parking lot and not into the neighborhood, he, thoughi the pedestrian i1ccess on Lynrose should be eliminated. He liked the wrought iron pop outs. He.did not feel there will be additional traffic because of Albertson's. He was concerned regarding the loading area and thought theeliminatlon of the shops would resolve the problem of deliveries. Arcadia City Planning Commission 1125/94 Page 7 . . J . , , ~ Commissioner Kovacic agreed with the property owner's right to use the property int is properly zoned. Both the General Plan and' the Zoning allows what is pfQposed. . He feels that a. park ()r ~ool are .unreasonable to expect. He was COncerned With the'50 foot setback. He feels thatmaintaining'a 50 foot.setbaclds great to protect the residents to the south. He does notlike the loading-situation. Commissioner: Daggett does not want to be ina position the Planning Commission could decide the use of a property owned bya private citizen. He was not concerned about the traffic generated in the immedia.te area, because he feels it will be generated by the immediate neighborhood. He agreed with Commission.er Hedlund regarding closing off the pedestrian access ohLynrose. He also shares concern With Commissioner. Hedlund over the delivery arrangements, but thought.the screening of the dock area has been very cleverly done. Commissioner Hedlund and Commissioner Daggett discussed some a1temate,ideasfor deliveries. One of the ideas was to elhnlnate, the shops. Donna Butler statl!d that the shops and restaurant aie pennltted uses in the C-M zone, MOTION It was moved by Commissioner Kovacic, seconded by Commissioner Daggett to reopen.the public hearing so questions from the applicant regarding delivery alternatives could be discussed. The motion passed by Voice vote with none dissenting. Mrs, Parker objected and said that ifthey had more time they could have been.better prepared for tonight. City Attorney Mike Miller explained. to Mrs, Parker that she can file an appeal, to the City, Council if she, wishes. Mr, Rue re-emphaSized that there will be a maximum of ~o trucks a day that Will be using this loading area in off peak.hours. !f you move the shops the trucks will still'have to use this loading area. !fyou remove the shops everyone will be able to look back into that dock area. Nothing Will be solved by removing the shops. MOTION It was movect'by Commissioner Buang, seconded by Commissioner Daggett to close the public hearing. The motion passed by voice vote with none dissenting. Commissioner Hllang expressed his feeling'thathe would like to see the retail building front'on.Live Oak. Ms, Butler explained that if the shops were moved to front on Live Oak, access to the loading dock would be between the inarketand the retail building. This would force pedestrians'to cros~ the driveway to the loading area, creating a potential problem by mixing pedestrian With delivery, trucks. Also, the idea of having retail buildings adjacent to the-streetis for strip commercial retail area. The uses to the east are office/industrial uses and there is very minimaLfoot traffic in the area. Commissioner Kovadcwantedto know if he is the only person concerned with the 50 foot setback on Lynrose Ave. Commissioner Hedlund does not see a problem with it. Commissioner GIark agrees With no pedestrian access from. Lynrose, but has no problems with the current location of the retail shops. Commissioner Daggett stated that number 100f the conditions has been elimfnated,and that they need to add some condtions. Arcadia City Planning Commission 1/25/94 Page 8 ':c . ~ .~ .. ~ ~ . . Commissioner Clark wants a further study'on traffic conditions. MOTION It was moved by Commissioner Daggett, seconded by Commissioner Hedlund that CUP 93-lnl be approved witn the conditions set forth in the staff report specifically #1-16 excluding #10 and adding #17-Eliminate pedestrian access in the south wall along Lynrose St, #18 the applicant shall redesign the south wall of the market facing LynroseStreet to create more architectural drama, and,#19 to have staff study traffic and an alternate left turn mechanism at the comer of Live Oak .and Third, and Fourth. ROLL <:AtL: AYES: NOES: <:ommissioners Hedlund, Kovacic, Huang, Daggeit, Clark None -' Chairman Clark noted that there, is a five working day appeal period after the adoption of the Resolution which will be February 8, 1994. . MOTION It was moved by Commissioner Hedlund, seconded by <:ommissioner Daggett to continue Public Hearing TPM 93-005. The motion. passed by voice vote with none dissenting. The public hearing was opened, In favor Michael Rue, 13522Newport #202, Tustin,<:A, the reason for the split is because Albertsonsis going to, own their own storeahd Marketplace properties will own the shops. He had no problems with the conditions. Noone spoke in opposition. MOTION It was moved by Commissioner Hedlund, seconded by <:ommissioner Daggett to dose the public hearing. The motion passed by voice vote with none dissenting. MOTION It was moved by Commissioner Hedlund; seconded by Commissioner Daggett to approve TPM 93-005. ROLL <:ALL: AYES; NOES: Commissioners Daggett; Huang, Kovacic, Hedlund, Clark None Commissioner Clark stated that TPM 93-005 has a ten working day appealperiod. AUDIENCE PARTl<:IPATION None Arcadia City Planning Commission 1/25/94 Page 9 . . J,. - , .... ... \-1:' I ---~----~--------~-_._--~------ MA TfERS..FROM COUNOL Coundlman Lojeski announced that Bill ,Kelly has been promoted to Acting City Manager. He updated theComrnissionon theeart~quake, on January 17, 1994 at 4:31 a.m. there was a 6.6 earthquake, it tested the readiness and ability of the City to react. AJ!Jhe preparedness and training through simulation indeed paid off. ' He also reminded the Commission that the Commissioners dinner is on February 2, 1994 at 6:30 p.m" Wednesday, at the C()mmunity Center. MA TIERS FROM COMMISSION None ------------------------------- - . --, MA TIERS FROM STAFF None ADJOURNMENT Adjoul'!' at 11:15 p.m. to February 8; 1994. " . ~ """ ~. ..... , -- , v" 'Lt.' '~- I L,,'/.;"''-' \ ',"///--.:.-':'. ''SeCretary, Ai-Cadi .. ning Commission Arcadia City Planning Commission 1/25/94 Page 10