HomeMy WebLinkAboutAUGUST 11, 1998
V
I
.,
.
MINUTES
-
Arcadia City Planning Commission
Tuesday~ August 11, 1998
7:15 p.m. intbc CoimciJ Cbambers
Planning Commission proceedings are tape-recorded and on file in the office of the Community
Development Division.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Planning Commission of the City of Arcadia met in regular session on Tuesday, August 11,
.1998 at 7:15 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the City of Arcadia, at240 W. Huntington Drive with
Chairman Pro Tern Richard.Bruckner presiding.
ROLL CALL:
PRESENT: Commissioners Huang, MUrphy, Sleeter, Bruckner
ABSENT: Commissioner Kalemkiarian
MOTION
It was moved by Commissioner Huang, seconded by Commissioner Sleeter to read the
resolutions by title only and waive reading the full body of the. resolutions. The motion
passed by voice vote.
OTHERS ATTENDING
City Attorney Michael Miller
Community Development Administrator Donna Butler
Associate Planner Jim Kasama
Assistant Planner Candyce Burnett
Secretary Silva Vergel
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FROM ST AFFREGARDING AGENDA ITEMS
Ms. Butler distributed a letter of opposition from Mr. Rob Roy regarding TM 52653. He was
concerned with parking and the loss of his view. She indicated that a revised Resolution 1576 was
also distributed and noted that the title was the only thing that was revised.
TIME RESERVED FOR THOSE IN 1HE AUDIENCE WHO WISH TO ADDRESS TIffi PLANNING
COMMISSION ON NON-PUBLIC HEARING MAITERS (5 MINUTE LIMIT PER PERSON)
None
PRESENTATION TO OUTGOING MEMBER CAROLYN BELL
Chairman Pro Tent Bruckner presented a resolution to Carolyn Bell who served on the Planning
Commission for four years. He indicated that he would miss her guidance and expertise regarding
landscaping issues.
,.
.
.
Ms. Bell introduced her family. She said that she enjoyed serving on the Planning Commission and
commended them on doing a fantastic job. She suggested having a "Tree Committee" and hopefully
she could participate in that at a later date.
Commissioner Murphy remarked that she provided a wonderful dimension to the Planning
Commission and he enjoyed working with her.
Commissioner Sleeter said he would miss her views on landscaping issues. Her eye for de1ai1 was
very beneficial to them. He remarked that she would see and point out things that he would never
see.
Commissioner Huang agreed and hoped that one day they would getanotherIandscape architect on
the Planning Commission, which would help balance out their expertise. He felt they would be short
handed without Ms, Bell.
1. MINUTES of 7/28/98
MOTION
It was moved by Commissioner Murphy, seconded by Commissioner Sleeter to approve the
Minutes of July 28th as published.
ROLL CALL:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Commissioner Huang, Murphy, Sleeter, Bruckner
None
Commissioner Kalemkiarian
2. PUBLIC HEARING CUP 98-016 & ADR 98-018
12340 Lower Azusa Rd.
Airtouch Cellular
Consideration of a conditional USe permit for a cellular telecommunications facility and a 45'
tall monopole antennae structure.
The staff report was presented and the public hearing was opened.
Nad Pendleton, Air Touch, 3 Park Plaza, Irvine, was in agreement with all the .conditions in the staff
report. He asked that condition no. 1 be revised because they found that it. is better to use a
galvanized pole which in amatter of a few short months begins to blend in better instead of painting
the pole.
No one else spoke in favor of or in opposition to this item.
Chairman Pro Tem Bruckner declared the public hearing closed.
Arcodia City PIamUng eoumuss;""
2
'811I/98
..
.
~
Commissioner Sleeter was impressed with the photos that were submitted and said they were an
excellent tool in illustrating the situations. He recalled another antenna that was approved in the
same vicinity within the last year and thought that they required them to paint the pole blue or
similar and felt they need to be consistent and require the.same from this applicant.
Commissioner Murphy did not want to amend condition no. I and felt confident staff could review
and approved the color of the pole.
Commissioner Huang thought that a light blue would match the existmgpole best.
MOTION
It was moved by Commissioner Sleeter, seconded by Commissioner Bruckner to approve
CUP 98-016 & ADR 98-018 subject to the conditions in the staff report with the
modification to condition no. I that the color be consistent With the previously approved pole
in the area.
ROLL CALL:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Commissioner Hilali& Murphy, Sleeter, Bruckner
None
Commissioner Kalemkiarian
Chairman Pro Tem Bruckner noted that there is a five working day appeal period after adoption of
the resolution. The resolution Will be adopted on August 25th. AppealS are to be .filed by
Wednesday, September 2nd.
3. PUBLICHEARINGTM 52653
22-26Fano St.
NCK Development, LLC
Consideration of a tentative map for an 8~unit condominium project.
The staff report was presented and the public hearing was opened.
Engles Shell, 1111 Corporate Center, Monterey Park, was in agreement with all of the conditions in
the staff report. He did not think there would be a parking problem and explained the number of
available parking spaces including guest parking.
No one else spoke in favor of or in opposition to this item,
Chairman Pro Tem Bruckner declared the public hearing closed and said that it appears that the
project is in full compliance With Code.
MOTION
It was moved by Commissioner Murphy, seconded by Commissioner Sleeter to approve TM ,~
52653 subject to the conditions in the staffreport.
An:adia City PlamUng Commission
3
8/11198
.
.
.
ROLL CALL:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Commissioner Huang, Murphy, Sleeter, Bruckner
None
Commissioner Kalernkiarian
Chairman Pro Tern Bruckner noted that there is a ten-day appeal period. Appeals are to be filed by
Friday, August 2181.
NON PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
4. RESOLUTION NO. 1575
A resolution of the Planning Conunission of the City of Arcadia, California, granting CUP 98-016 to
operate:a child care center at 2612 S. Baldwin Ave.
RESOLUTION NO. 1576
A resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Arcadia, Califomia, recommending to the
City Council approval ofGP 98-001 and amending Appendix A and the Community Development
elernentofthe Arcadia General Plan addressing statutory requirements relating to the City's Housing
Elernent
Ms. Butler read the titles of the resolutions.
MOTION
It was moved by Commissioner Murphy, seconded by Commissioner Bruckner to adopt
Resolutions No. 1575 and 1576 and to formally affirm the decision ofJuly 2 8th and the votes
thereon.
ROLL CALL:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Commissioner Huang, Murphy, Sleeter, Bruckner
None
Commissioner Kalemkiarian
Chairman Pro Tern Bruckner noted that there is a five working day appeal period following the
adoption of the resolutions. Appeals are.to be filed by Wednesday, August 19th.
MATTERS FROM CITY COUNCIL
None
MATTERS FROM PLANNING COMMISSON
None
An:odio Ci1y P1lUDlillg CoumDss;..
4
8/11/98
.
MODIFICATION COMMITTEE MEETING ACTIONS
~
Commissioner Huang recapped the actions taken by the Modification Committee, Staff expanded on
the actions that were taken.
MATTERS FROM STAFF
1, Discussion regarding Santa Anita Commercial Center Schedule
Don Penman, Deputy City Manger/DeveIopment Services Director was present He remarked that it
has been a tight schedule. from the beginning of this project. Santa .Anita would like entitlement by
the end of the year, There are a few times in the year that theaters like to open and Santa Anita
would like to be open by Thanksgiving of 1999.
He recommended one joint meeting with the City Council where the applicant and his architect
would present the project. At this meeting, they will discuss the circulation and general information
about the project. They could ask them questions and discuss issues at this time,
From there separate study sessions would be,held by the Planning Commission, where they would be
able to reView the project. These meetings'wouId be open to the public, The audience would be able
'to speak under time reserved from the audience. Noticed public hearings would then be scheduled at
a later date before the Planning Commission and City Council to review the EIR and Specific Plan.
It is hoped that the public hearings before the Planning Commission would be held at their October
27111 or November 10111 meeting and before the City Council on November 17111 or December 1st.
The Planning Commission can hold as many public meetings/work sessions as they feel necessary to
review the project, ask questions and discuss issues. It is requested, though, that these meetingS be
held in a condensed time frame. Meetings do not have to be held on regular Planning Commission
meeting dates and can even be held on Saturdays. Once they are comfortable with the project, then
public hearings can be scheduled,
Mr"Miller noted that at the study session a time slot should be aIlottedfor audience comments and
testimony would need to be taken. from anyone wishing to speak.
Commissioner Sleeter asked about the overall time frame of the EIR? He asked that there be enough
time between-the public meetings and the public hearings so they can have time to review the EIR
and documents, He did not want the public hearings scheduled,immediately after the work sessions.
He commented that usually the,same people attend the meetings, whether it is 2 or 4 meetings and
reiterate the same issues, .
Chairman Pro Tem Bruckner hoped that the applicant would be able to discuss their marketing
strategies when they present the project as well as design aspects, He said the Planning Commission
is willing to spend as much time as necessary to review the project. This is the largest parcel in the
City and it is important that they have the best development
Mr. Penman thought that they were running a couple of weeks behind their original set dates, He
assured the Planning Commission that there would be at least a couple of weeks between the public
meetings and the actual public hearings,
ArcodUo City PbmDDIg Commission
~
8/11/98
.
.
Commissioner Murphy did not mind having meetings on consecutive nights to review the project
Several dates were discussed for the joint meeting with the City Council and the Planning
Commission suggested the following dates: August 31st, September 14th, 16th or 17th, Mr. Penman
would report these dates to the City Council at their next meeting.
Ms. Butler said have already done the screen check on the EIR and are in the process of
incorporating adllitional information that was requested into the Draft EIR.
She stated . that based on their hearings held for the General Plan, the public does not differentiate
between the EIR and the actual project. Thus, it is best to hold the public hearings atthe same time.
The Planriing Commission's WiUmake recOmmendations to the City Council who has the final
action and certifies the EIR. Just like the General Plan meetings, they wouId.hold the meetings at
the Community Center because it can accommodate aIot more people.
Mr. Austin discussed the retirement of Mr. Gosseman and assured the Planning Commission that
- . .
they have no plans of disbanding racing. They are.hereto stay.
2. CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS
3. UPCOMINGAGENDAITEMS
Ms. Butler recapped the upcoming projects before the Planning Commission and recent actions taken by
the City Council.
ADJOURNMENT
An:adia Cily PJanniDg Commission
6
SIUi9ll