HomeMy WebLinkAboutNOVEMBER 13, 2001
(i)
.
MINUTES
.
Arcadia City Planning Commission
Tuesday, November 13,2001
7:15 p.m. in Ihe Council Chambers
Planning Commission proceedings are tape-recorded and on file in the office of the Community
Development Division.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Planning Commission of the City of Arcadia met in regular session on Tuesday, November 13,
2001 at 7:15 p.rn. in the Council Chambers of the City of Arcadia, at 240 W. Huntington Drive with
Chairman Kalemkiariari presiding.
ROLL CALL:
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
Commissioners.Baderian,.Huang, Olson, Kalemkiarian
Commissioner Murphy
MOTION
It was moved by Commissioner Huang, seconded by Commissioner Baderian to excuse
Commissioner Murphy from tonighCs meeting. The motion passed by voice vote with none
dissenting.
OTHERS ATIENDlNG
Council Member Gail Marshall
Community Development Administrator Donna Butler
Associate Planner James Kasama
Senior Administrative Assistant Silva VergeI
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FROM STAFF REGARDING AGENDA ITEMS
Ms. BlItler said that additional information was distributed relating to item no. 6 on the agenda Also,
item no. 2 is being continued to the Planning Commission's November 27th meeting. If there is anyone
who would like to speak on theprojectthey may do so now otherWise there will not be a report by staff.
Item no. 7 is being pulled off the agenda She announced that Commissioner Baderian would be leaving
at 8:30. She also asked if any of the Planning Commissioners would be unavailable at the December
lIth meeting. Commissioners Baderian and Kalemkiarian indicated that they would not be at that
meeting.
TIME RESERVED FOR THOSE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISH TO ADDRESS THE.PLANNING
COMMISSION ON NON-PUBLIC HEARING MATTERS (5 MINUTE LIMIT PER PERSON)
None
.
.
MOTION
It was moved by Commissioner Baderian, seconded by Commissioner Huang to read all
resolutions by title only and waive reading the full body of the resolution. The motion passed by
voice vote with none dissenting.
1. MINUTES 10/25/01
MOTION
It was moved by Commissioner Olson, seconded by Commissioner Huang to approve the
Minutes of October 25th aspublished.
ROLL CALL:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Commissioners Baderian, Huang, Olson, Kalemkiarian
None
Commissioner Murphy
2. CONTINUED PUBLIC
657 W. Duarte Rd.
Carlos and Elizabeth Andrlno
Consideration ()f a conditional use permit to operate a. children's daycare and preschool facility
from 6:30 a,m. to 6:30 p.m., 5-days a week.
This item is being continued to the November 27th meeting.
3. PUBLIC HEARING TI'M 01-012
24 Alta St.
Hank long
Consideration ofa tentative parcel map for a 2-unit condominium project.
The staff report was presented and the public hearing was opened.
Scott Chen, 11823 Slauson Ave., Santa Fe Springs, said they are in.agreement with all of the conditions
in the staff report.
No one elSe spoke in favor of or in opposition to this item.
Chairman Kalenikiarian closed the public hearing.
MOTION
It was moved by Commissioner Badeiiim, seconded by Commissioner Olson to file the Negative
Declaration and approve TPM 01-012.subject to the conditions listed in the staff report.
Arcadia" City PhUUlll.lg Commission
2
11113/01
.
.
ROLL CALL:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Commissioners Baderian, Huang, Olson, Kalemkiarian
None
Commissioner Murphy
Chairman Kalemkiarian noted that there is a ten day appeal period. Appeals are to be filed by
November 26th.
4. PUBLIC BEARING TPM 01-013
103S.Fairveiw Ave.
Hank Jong
Consideration of a tentative parcel map for a 2-unit condominium project.
The staff report was presented and the public hearing was opened,
Scott Chen, 11823 Slauson.Ave., Santa Fe Springs, said they are in agreement with all Mthe conditions
in the staff report.
No one else spoke in favor of or in opposition to this item.
Chaiiman Kalemkiarian closed the public hearing.
MOTION
It was moved .by Commissioner Baderian, seconded by Commissioner Olson to file the Negative
Declaration and approve TPM 01-013 subject to the conditionS listed in the staff report.
ROLL CALL:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Commissioners.Baderian,Huang, Olson, Kalemkiarian
None.
Commissioner Murphy
Chairman Kalemkiarian noted that there isa ten day appeal .period. Appealsare to be filed by
November 26lh.
5. PUBLIC HEARING TPM 01-014
206 S. Third Ave.
Hank long
Consideration ofa tentative parcel map for a 2-unit condominium project.
The staff report was presented and the public hearing was opened.
Scott Chen, 11823 Slauson Ave., Santa Fe Springs, said they are in agreement with all of the conditions
in the staff report.
ArcadIa City Planning Commission
3
11113/0 I
.
.
No one else spoke in favor of or in opposition to this item.
Chairman Kalemkiarian closed the public hearing.
MOTION
It was moved by Commissioner Baderian, seconded by Commissioner Olson to file the Negative
Declaration and approve TPM 01-014 subject to the conditions listed in the staff report.
ROLL CALL:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Commissioners Baderian, Huang, Olson, Kalemkiarian
None
Commissioner Murphy
Chairman Kalemkiarian noted that there is a ten day appeal period. Appeals are to be filed by
November 26th.
6. PUBLIC BEARING
821 San Vicente
Ibrahim lrawan
Consideration of an appeal of the Rancho Santa Anita Residents Association's (BOA)
Architectural Review Board's (ARB) denial of a proposed 5,888 'sq. ft. home with an attached
926 sq. ft. 3-car garage. In addition, the applicant is requesting a modification to permit a
front entry height of20'-0" in lieu ofa maximum height of 14'-0", and an encroachment into
the drip line of an existing oak tree that is currently within the property's front yard area.
The staff report was presented.
Ms. Butler explained that when the applicant appealed the ARB's decision to the City, he submitted
revised plans which had a reduced the height of the entry to 14'. The City discovered this discrepancy
and the applicant submitted the plans that the ARB reviewed and voted on. The ARB Chairperson
confirmed that the later plans were ones that they reviewed and took action on. They must appeal the
plans that the ARB reviewed. She explained the front yard setback requirement.
The public hearing was opened.
Colin Greene, Hanlon & Greene, 215 N. Marengo Ave., Pasadena, said that according to code if the
house has a 75+ setback it is not subject to the 14' height limitation. In this case the home meets that
criteria because the front entry is between 75'-78'. In speaking with staff; they felt that the foyer and
the entry complied with code. This type of an entry is consistent with many other homes in the
community. In light of the fact that there is a large oak tree located in the front yard, this entry is far
less obtrusive than the other entries depicted in the photos presented and ones approved by the Pil!nning
Commission in the past. He noted that all surrounding property owners have reviewed the plans and
have seen an artist's rendering. There are many people in the audience who have attended the meeting
tonight who are in favor of the proposal.
Arcadia City Planning Commission
4
J 1113/01
.
.
In reply to comments by Commissioner Huang, Mr. Green replied that the initial entrance is 14' high
back to the door which is under that limit, then there is a separation, then the upper story of the house
from the foyer. In reading the AMC, they feh the intent was to allow for this type of a design and
entrance. He felt the way it is written is that the City does not want an 18' high door or entrance but if it
is somehow separated, as in this case, then it is acceptable.
Don Crenshaw, 126 St. Joseph St;, the architect, said the front covered porch is 14' high, then it goes
back 6' to the entry door. The entry door lines up with the window above because the inside entry is
two-story. The plane of the window is the same as the door. In speaking with staff, he was informed
that this could be worked out with the applicant by moving the door back by 2'.
Chairman Kalemkiarianasked if there were any objections to changing the shape of the window so that
it does not create that line?
Mr. Crenshaw said looking at it from the inside the door and the window line up.
Mr. Green remarked that the arborist's report notes where the front entry and the house would be
relative to the oak tree.
Ms. Butler said the a 14' high entry meets code requirement.
Tony Henrich, 431 Altura Rd., President of the HOA, distributed a handout to the Planning
Commission. He remarked that he has visited many different charming and prestigious cities and
communities. You cannot take what is a beautiful home from Santa Barbara and put in Charleston, it
would just not fit in. It would not be compatible. Thc house could be the most beautiful home but it
may not necessarily fit in a particular community. He cited a quote'from a previous Chairperson"which
in part stated that "good architecture character is based upon the principals of harmony and proportion of
the elements of the structure as well as the relationship of such principals to adjacent structures and
other structures in the neighborhood". This strikes at the heart of their decision. The charter from the
City Council stipulates that their guidelines are to promote and maintain the quality of homes, protect
the property values, predict predominant characters of homes, assure contemporary standards of
harmony, assure building structures and landscape are all in harmony. They are also to assure that
designs are not garish or unrelated to the area. Good architecture is based upon harmony and
proportions and how it relates to other structures in the neighborhood.
Lou Papas, }20 Harvard, serving on the ARB. Their_ goals as ,ARB are, to adhere to the City's
Resolution and to assure that any development conforms with the majority of the homes in the area for
the purpose of maintaining harmony in the neighborhood. The ARB has been instructed by the HOA to
work to maintain the defming character of the area pursuant to the element of style. The element of
style as dictated by the HOA is to look for a horizontal feeling when viewed from the street. So, when
looking at a house from the street, their homes almost uniformly have a horizontal feel as opposed to a
vertical feel. They are mandated to look for simple roof appearances, strong and articulated eave lines,
scale of the windows, doors, main entries, the harmonious use of materials and the use of lJlultiple
materials in the construction of homes. In other words, they do not have homes that are generally just
stucco, they have combination of brick, stucco, masonry, wood, siding. They also look for landscaping
with the final view of the home. The rendering before the Planning Commission provided by the
applicant is one that the ARB has never seen as a board. The plan that the Planning Commission is
looking at has been , revised 4-5 times and it has gotten confusing because the plans that were originally
submitted which was ultimately rejected by the ARB was not the one that was ultimately submitted to
Arcadia City Planning Commission
s
11/13/01
.
.
the City. The ARB is to look for a defined architectural style. In this project there is no defined
architectural style., The ARB tried to work with the homeowner and ultimately the architect stopped
attending the meetings.
Ms. Butler indicated that the plans before the Planning Commission tonight are the ones that were
submitted to the ARB. These were the plans that the ARB voted on. The City had the applicant
resubmit the plans that were originally submitted to the ARB. The plans here tonight are the ones
denied by the ARB. This has been confirmed by the ARB ChairperSon. Originally, the applicant
submitted plans that were not seen by the ARB but the plans here are ones the one that the ARB acted
on.
Commissioner Huang said tbat Mr. Papas stated that as a board one of the criteria they look at is a
horizontal. reeling. Is there a document that indicates this issue?
Mr. Papas replied that it is nota specifically written standard. The HOA turned in a document dealing
with elements of style and there is specific language in there dealing with what they look for and one of
the, elements, is the horizontal style vs. the vertical feel.
Ms. Butler clarified that Mr. Heinrich did submit information to the City. But, it is important to note
that the information on their criteria has not been adopted by the City. It is not a part of the official
ARB regulations, It is something that they have developed but has not been approved by the City. She
. . .
indicated that the City does not have standards for single-fumily residences. This document was
submitted for City~s Comments. The document had a lot of information relating to landscaping and
other items, which are not in the jurisdiction of a homeowners association. The City does not adopt
standards for any of the HOAs. This is something that they use asa guideline for their association only
not something that has been approved by the City.
Dale Brown, 507 Monte Vista, member of ARB, said those guidelines were given to the homeowner
when they f1TSt approached the ARB. Design is very personal. There is consistency with the homes in
their area, One issue they look at is the roof of a home. Typically on a two-Story home, the roof is one
of the predominant elements of the home. The eaves typically come down to about the head of the
window and are articulated through exposed raft rounds or some other details but when looking at an
elevation the eaves come down to approximately 2.5' from the front of the home coming down to a
point roughly at the head of the window. This brings the scale of home down., The entry is usually not
the dominant element on the elevation of the front of the home. Typically homes have two to three
materials with a combination of brick, masonry, pIaster, stucco or-siding. Unless"it is a very traditional
style home, typically, in a ranch style home, the second floor is setback from the front of the house -
usually softened by a front porch or other elements. There is a difference between the plane of the home
on the first floor and the plane of the front of the home on the second floor. There are a variety of styles
of homes in their area. He went through the handout that was distributed and discussed briefly the
various styles of the homes. He said compatibility must be relative to those prominent styles. In these
homes, the roofs have a different character from the rest of the home. Typically, the eaves are.above the
windows. There is exposed wall above windows. The eaves do not project out and if they do they are
usually a molded cornice. Typically, the rooflines and the other elements are subtle. Most of the homes
in the area have ceiling heights between 8' to 8'-3" for the fIrst and second floors but this home has a
I 0' first floor and a 9' second floor. With these dimensions and without reducing the height of the eaves
a vertical appearance is created. They are concerned about the horizontal nature, the entry and the single
use of material. This home has a very strong entry and a curved two-story window to the right. These
are two very strong vertical elements which are incompatible with each other. He remarked that the
~ia City Planning Commi5$ion 6 fl/13101
.
.
home should be compatible and needs to be appropriate without the use of landscaping to mitigate its
appearance.
In response to a question by Chairman Kalemkiarian, Mr. Brown replied that they are proposing to use
light gray color smooth stucco. Ahhough, when done, the windows will pop out, they believe that-it is a
fairly monolithic appearance. They do not object to the use of smooth stucco but that. and a relatively
smooth concrete trim together are not an element of a historic style. They do not feel that it is
compatible.
Heidi Elder, said she resides next door to the proposed home. She said that standing on her sidewalk
she looks up at her home which is a typical home in the area She feared how this home would look
considering its proposed height. The ambiance of the area is what attracted her here. She said that
although, she did sign the petition, she never saw or reviewed the plans. She knew he would be making
changes but she did not koow whatthose changes woUld be.
In rebuttal, Mr. Greene said that the intent of the Resolution is not to stifle creativity. He indicated that
Mr. Brown talked about a variety of styles os homes.. most of which are reflected on the submitted board
of photos. Looking at the photos this house looks like it will fit in. It appeared to him that the ARB is
.
very limited with what can and cannot be done. It seemed to him that they are trying to prevent
individuality. He could not find anything that stated what types of home can be built.
In reply to a question by Chairman Kalemkiarian, Mr. Crenshaw tried to describe the home which he
said is "courttry French with concrete tile roof'. The house and pre-cast will be painted gray with a
charcoal colored roof. He did not know what the property owners intended to. do with the fence which is
existing; He showed. the fence on the rendering because it is existing, He said they had 5 official
meetings with the ARB, in addition to a couple of informal meetings. He has designed homes in this
HOAin recent years.
Commissioner Baderian left at 8:30 p;m.
Mr. Crenshaw explained the changes they made at the ARB~s request. The ARB requested that they
break up the verticalfeel and add a horizontal appearance ilnd they feel they have accomplished that.
Commissioner Huang remarked that the ARB does,not seem'to like the architectUral features, They are
requesting that the eaves be brought down to the top of the windows. They are requesting that more
than one building material be used. Which one of these have they done?
Mr.. Crenshaw explained that it is physically impossible to bring down the eaves with a J 0' ceiling.
They would need to reduce the pitch to accomplish that He did not know how to achieve that without
clipping the ceiling of the house without having an angle on the inside to achieve that look. With regard
to the use of multiple materials, he explained that the owner did not want to use stone or brick and
preferred the use of stucco.
Barry Churbach, 60S N. Old Ranch Rd., said that he is the other adjacent neighbor. He welcomed this
home in his neighborhood and did not object to it. He felt that it is harmonious and will be compatible.
He is also concerned with property values and compatibility. He felt that property values would be
negatively affected if the ARB tries to dictate the types of homes in the area.
No one else spoke in favor of or in opposition to this item.
Arcadia City Planning Commission
7
11113/01
.
.
Chairman Kalemkiarian closed the public hearing.
Ms. Butler said that the plans comply with code as revised but what is p~sented to the Planning
Commission as part of the exhibit does not meet code. She did hot think that the ARB saw the cross
section. What they saw is the elevation that is at the bottom of the exhibit which was presented. Staff is
in favorofa 14' height entry way.
Commissioner Huang said thathe reviewed the reasons for denial by the HOA. One was that the two-
story elevation and scale was not in character with the area. There are many two-story homes in the
area. They objected to the two-story living room combined with the high entry. The living room is
interior space and a personal preference and has nothing to do with the exterior of the building which
will affecUhe neighborhood. They discussed multiple eave lines, which in their opinion creates "visual
clutter". In his opinion, a single eave line is too simplistic, whereas, the multiple eave lines enrich the
appearance. A house of this size should have more than a single eave line. He was unclear with the
HOA's remarks on the compatibili!y of the vertical and horizontal elements on the front ~de.
Commissioner Olson said that Mr, Brown said that they should view homes without landscaping. But,
in this particular case, there is a beautiful oak tree in the front yard. In his opinion, landscaping is a
very important element. If they were to wipe out all the landscaping in the City and just have building,
they would all be shocked as to what they saw. This home has been designed such that the beautiful oak
tree located in the front yard would be saved. The tree also helps mitigate the visual affects from the
street. There is only a 2-car garage on the street on a house that, is ona fairly wide. lot. There are homes
in the city with aJ-car garage on smaller lots. He felt this home represents the changes that the City
Council has made in the code. He did not object to the contemporary appearance of the home. They
need to look and accept change and for what pe(jple are looking for the future. With the exception of
one neighbor who has changed her mind, the people that are most impacted by this.houseseem to be in
favor of it and think it will improve their l.1eighborhood, don't see it as a detriment and reel it is in
harmony with the. area. He was disappointed that this matter has dragged on-for over one year and it
has not gotten very far.
Chairman Kalemkiarian said generally both the ARB and staff's recommendations and decisions are
very strong with the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission does not tend to rule against
either one often; It is difficuh supporting the ARB's decision partially because the house is setback
almost 80'. Given the lot coverage ratio permitted in the City, the proposed house is much smaller than
what actually can be constructed and still cOl!lPly wjthJ:oqe. Techllically, they Can build a much larger
home on this lot and still comply with code. He believed in proper!y owners' rights.
MOTION
It was moved by Commissioner Olson, seconded by Commissioner Huang to approve the appeal
and overrule the Rancho Santa Anita Resident's Association's denial, fmdingthat 'the proposed
project is architecturally harmonious and compatible and direct staff to prepare the appropriate
resolution incorporating the Planning Commission's decision and findings in support of that
decision.
Arcadia City Planning Commission
8
11113/01
.
.
ROLL CALL:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Commissioners, Huang, Olson, Kalemkiarian
None
Commissioners Baderian and Murphy
Chairman Kalemkiarian noted that there is a .five working day appeal period after the adoption of the
resolution. The resolution will be adopted on November 27th. Appeals'areto be filed, by December 5th.
7. PUBLIC BEARING tup 2000-002 (Revision)
127 S. First Ave.
Sandy Yang
Consideration of a revision to the approved CUP, requesting to deletion of the condition
relating to the non-exclusive and shared-use status of the parking behind the building.
RESOLUTION NO. 1661
A resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Arcadia, amending Reso. 160$
deleting conditions relating to parking at 127 S. First Ave.
No action taken on this item.
8. PUBLIC HEARING MP 01-016 & ADR01-027
41 Fano St.
Sanyao 101']
Consideration of modifications for a 3-unit condominium project.
The staff report was presented and the public hearing was opened.
Robert Tong, 255 Santa Clara, said he convillced the property owner to reduce the size of the units and
to have the garages not facing the street. They tried a different design .and a new idea. They are in
agreement with all of the conditions in the staff report.
Commissioner Huang commended the architect on his efforts in trying to shift the garage locations on a
narrow lot and on this design.
No .one else spoke in favor of or in opposition to this item.
Chairman Kalemkiarlan closed the public hearing.
MOTION
It was moved by Commissioner Olson, seconded by Commissioner Huang to approve MP 01-
016 and ADR 01-027 subject to the conditions listed in the staffreport.
Arcadia City Planning Commission
9
11/13/01
.
.
ROLL CALL:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Commissioners, Huang, Olson, Kalemkiarian
None
Commissioners Baderian and Murphy
Chairman Kalemkiarian noted that there is a a five working day appeal period. Appeals are to be filed
by November 21 st.
9. PUBLIC HEARING CUP 01-027
5630 Peck Rd.
Cox PCS
Consideration of a conditional use permit to install a wireless communications fucility.
RESOLUTION NO. 1664
A resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Arcadia, granting CUP 01-027 for the
ihstallationofwireless communications fucility at 5630 Peck Rd.
The staff report was presented and the public hearing was opened
Ryan Leaderman, 1590 Hawthrone, Lawndale, representing Cox pcS, said they are in agreement with
all of the conditions in the staff report. He discussed a variety' of trees that they had available but the
one 'atthis location would be a palm tree. .
No one else spoke in favor of or in opposition to this item
Chairman Kalemkiarian closed the public hearing.
MOTION
It was moved by Commissioner Olson,. seconded by Commissioner Huang to approve CUP 01-
027, file the Negative Declaration lII1d adopt Reso. 1664 subject to the conditions listed in the
staff report.
ROLL CALL:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Commissioners, Huang, Olson, Kalemkiarian
None
Commissioners.Baderian and Murphy
Chairman Kalemkiarian noted that is a five working day appeal period after the adoption of the
resolution. Appeals are to be filed by November2151.
Arcadia City Planning COmmission
10
11113/0 r
.
.
10. PUBLIC HEARING CUP 01-028
203 S..First Ave.
Helen warig and Matt Vantuch
Consideration of a conditional use permit for a coffee shop .with indoor and outdoor seating,
from 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., Monday-Thursday, and 6:00 a.m. to midnight, Fri(Jays and
Saturdays.
RESOLUTION NO. 1663
A resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Arcadia, granting CUP 01-028 for a
coffee shop at 203 S. First Ave.
The staff report was presented.
The public hearing was opened.
Matt Vantuch, 326 El Dorado, said they are in agreement with all of the conditions in the staff report
with the exception that they woli!d like to be open 7 -days a week.
Staff. indicated that the applicant did not present any plans for the back patio although they did discuss it.
They can have seating for up to 12 but-anything overthat would need a new CUP.
No one else spoke in favor of or in opposition to this item.
Chairman Kalemkiarian closed the public hearing.
Staff indicated that the seating in the rear would not require a CUP if it is less than 12. Staff had no
objection with being. open 7-days awee~.
Ms. Butler said that incidental outdoor dining is available with a maximum ofl2 seats. Anythingover
that would require a CUP.
MOTION
It was-moved by Commissioner Huang, seconded by Commissioner Olson to approve CUP 01-
028, file the Negative Declaration and adopt Resolution No. 1663 subject to the conditions listed
in the staff report.
ROLL CALL:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Commissioners, Huang, Olson, Kalemkiarian
None
Commissioners Baderian.and Murphy
Chairman Kalemkiarian noted that there is a five working day appeal period after the adoption of the
resolution. Appeals are to be filed by November 21 st.
Arc:adia City Planning Commission
II
11113/01
.
.
11. PUBLIC BEARING MP 01-017
218 EI Dorado
John Sheng
Consideration of modifications fora 2-unit condominium project.
The staff report was presented.
Staff discussed the air conditioning location which encroaches into the setback.
The public hearing was opened.
John Sheng, 5926 Temple City Blvd., Temple City, said they are in agreement with aU of the conditions
in the staff report, The requests, which are not uncommon for this type of a narrow lot, are necessary to
accommodate this configuration.
Noone else spoke in favor of or in opposition to this item.
Chairman Kalemkiarian closed the public hearing.
MOTION
It was. moved by Commissioner Olson; seconded by Commissioner Huang to approve MP 01-
017 & ADR 01-033 subject to the conditions listed in thestaffreport. .
ROLL CALL:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Commissioners, Huang, Olson, Kalernkiarian
None
Commissioners Baderian and Murphy
Chairman Kalemkiarian noted that there is a five working day appeal period. Appeals are to be filed
by November 21 st.
NON PUBLIC.HEARING ITEMS
12. PLANNING COMMISSION DETERMINATION
Consideration of a vacation of a portion ofright-of~way in front of 225 and 255 E. Santa
Clara St.
The staff report was presented.
MOTION
It was moved by Commissioner Olson, seconded by Commissioner Huang to approve the
vacation ofa portion of right-of-way in front of22S and 255 E.Santa Clara St.
Arcadia City Planriing Commission
12
11113/01
.
.
ROLL CALL:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Commissioners, Huang, Olson, Kalemkiarian
None
Commissioners Baderian and Murphy
13. RESOLUTION NO. 1656
A resolution ofthe Planning Commission of the City of Arcadia, California, granting CUP 01-
021 for an after school educational center at 660 W. Duarte Rd., No.2.
Ms. Butler read the title of the resolution.
MOTION
It was moved by Commissioner Kalemkiarian, seconded by Commissioner Olson to adopt
Resolution No. 1656 and to formally affirm the decision of October 9th and the votes thereon.
ROLL CALL:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Conunissioners, Huang, Olson, Kalemkiarian
None
Commissione~ Baderian and Murphy
Chairman Kaleinkiarian noted that there is a five working day appeal period after the ad<1ption of the
resolution. Appeals are to be tiled by November 21st.
MATTERS FROM CITY COUNCIL
Council Member Marshall said signal on CarnpusDr. is now operational.
MATTERS FROM PLANNING COMMISSION
None
MODIFICATION COMMITTEE MEETING ACTIONS
None
MATTERS FROM STAFF
1. CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS
2. UPCOMlNGAGENDA ITEMS
Ms. Butler discussed the upcoming agenda items.
ADJOURN
ArCadia City Plaitriing CcmmissioD
Is/Donna Butler
Secretary, Arcadia Planning Commission
13
11113/01