Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFindings & Action FormSanta Anita Oaks ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD Findings and Action Report -5- Date: November 11, 2021 File No. Project Address: 643 Hampton Rd, Arcadia, CA 91006 Association Name: Santa Anita Oaks HOA Applicant Name: Peter Hong Property Owner(s) Name: Peter Hong This proposed one-story house is a replacement for an existing house which will be demolished. The new house will have an area of 4692 sq. ft. and a new ADU on the property will have 566 sq. ft. FINDINGS Only check those that are apply and provide a written explanation for each The proposed project  is,  is not consistent with the Site Planning Principles and Neighborhood Context Guidelines. Explanation: Efforts were made to create a design that was consistent and compatible with the majority of the ranch style home on this street. ________________________ The proposed project  is,  is not consistent with the Forms and Mass Guidelines. Explanation The proposed project  is,  is not consistent with the Frontage Conditions Guidelines. Explanation The proposed project  is,  is not consistent with the Garages and Driveways Guidelines. Explanation The proposed project  is,  is not consistent with the Architectural Styles Guidelines. Explanation:. The proposed project  is,  is not consistent with the Height, Bulk, and Scale Guidelines. Explanation_____________________________________________________ The proposed project  is,  is not consistent with the Roofline Guidelines. Explanation: Rooflines are all of consistent pitch and materials__________________ The proposed project  is,  is not consistent with the Entries Guidelines. Explanation: Entry is a modest single-story structure________________________ Santa Anita Oaks ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD Findings and Action Report -5- The proposed project  is,  is not consistent with the Windows and Doors Guidelines. Explanation: Windows and doors are consistent and appropriate for the design of the home________________________________________________________ The proposed project  is,  is not consistent with the Articulation Guidelines. Explanation: The design uses considerable articulation. ______________________ The proposed project  is,  is not consistent with the Facade Details Guidelines. Explanation: Façade treatments are consistent with the architectural style________ The proposed project  is,  is not consistent with the Colors and Materials Guidelines. Explanation: Appropriate materials are used. The proposed project  is,  is not consistent with the Accessory Lighting Guidelines. Explanation: Lighting is appropriate for the project___________________ The proposed project  is,  is not consistent with the Additions, Alterations, and Accessory Buildings/Structures Guidelines. Explanation:________________________________________________________ The proposed project  is,  is not consistent with the Hillside Properties Guidelines. Explanation:_NA_______________________________________________________ The proposed project  is,  is not consistent with the Fences, Walls, Gates, and Hedges Guidelines. Explanation:. _____ The proposed project  is,  is not consistent with the Impervious Coverage and Landscape Areas Guidelines. Explanation. ________________ ACTION Pursuant to City’s Development Code Section 9107.20.050, a Site Plan and Design Review in the Homeowners Association Areas may be approved only if it is found that the proposed development is consistent with the City’s adopted Design Guidelines.  APPROVED  CONDITIONALLY APPROVED  DENIED Date of ARB Meeting: NOVEMBER 11, 2021 ARB Members Rendering the Above Decision: Tom Walker (chair, ARB) Matt Rimmer (ARB) Loren Brodhead (ARB) Santa Anita Oaks ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD Findings and Action Report -5- Vince Vargas (ARB) Gilbert Perez (ARB) Jessica Louie (ARB) AYES: 6 NOES: 0 Abstain: ABSENT: Conditions of Approval: MODIFY PLANTINGS AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER. Once these conditional changes are provided, the plans will be stamped Reason for Denial: There is a ten (10) day appeal period for this application. To file an appeal, a completed Appeal Application form must be submitted to the City’s Planning Division along with a $600.00 appeal fee by _5:00PM_ p.m. on November 22, 2021. You will be notified if an appeal is filed. Approved designs shall expire in one year (November 11, 2022) from the effective date unless plans are submitted to Building Services for plan-check, a building permit is issued and the construction is diligently pursued, a certificate of occupancy has been issued, or the approval is renewed. The final plans must be consistent with the approved design concept plans and any conditions of approval. Any inconsistency from the approved design concept plans may preclude the issuance of a building permit. An extension may be granted by the ARB or designee, or the Review Authority that approved the project for a maximum period of one (1) year from the initial expiration date. An extension can only be granted if the required findings can be made. Please note that acceptance of an extension request does not indicate approval of an extension. You may visit the City’s website at www.ArcadiaCA.gov/noticesanddecisions to view this document. If you have any questions regarding the above decision, please contact the ARB Chairperson at saohoaarb@gmail.com. Thank you. c: City of Arcadia, Planning Division Santa Anita Oaks ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD Findings and Action Report -5-