Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNOVEMBER 8, 2005 ---::'Y. @) . MINUTES . Arudia city Planning ColDDIission Tuesday, November8,ZooS 7:00 p.m. in the Arcadia City Council Cbamben PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pl..nn;ng Commission of the City of Arcadia met. in regular session on Tuesday, October 25. 2005 at 7:00 p.m. in the Arcadia Council Chambers of the City of Arcadia, at 240 W. Huntington Dr. with Chairman Lucas presiding.. ROLL CALL: PRESENT: ABSENT: Commissioners Baderian. Hsll, Olson. Wen, Lucas None OTHERSA'ITENDING Community Development Administrator Donna Butler Associate Planner Tom Li Assistant Planner Andrew Gonzales Senior. Administrative Assistant Silva Vergel MOTION: It was moved by Commissioner Hsll, seconded by Commissioner Baderian to read all resolutions by title only and waive reading the full body of the resolution. The motion passed by voice vote with none dissenting. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FROM S'fAFF REGARDING AGENDA ITEMS Ms. Butler indicated that a revised resolution was submitted to the Planning Commission with regard to item 4 on,the agenda. TIME RESERVED FOR 'THOSE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISH TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON NON-PUBLIC HEARING MATTERS (5 MINUTE LIMIT PER PERSON) None 1. PUBLIC HEARING TPM 2005-005 36 Alta St. Hank Jong Consideration of a tentative parcel map for a 3-unit residential condominium project. .,., . . The staff report was presented and the public hearing was opened. The applicant was not present, and no one spoke in favor of or in opposition to this item. MOTION: It was moved by Commissioner Olson, seconded by Commissioner Hsu to close the public hearing. The motion passed by voice vote with no one dissenting. ROLL CALL: AYES: NOES: CommissioneI:S Baderian, Hsu, Olson. Wen, Lucas None MOTION: It was moved by Commissioner Baderian, se,c.onded by Commissioner Wen to approve TPM 2~OO5 subject to the conditions in the staff report. ROLL CALL: AYES: NOES: Commissioners Baderian, Hsu, Olson, Wen, Lucas None Chairman Lucas indicated that there is a ten-day appeal period. Appeals are to be filed by November 18th. 2. PUBIJC HEARING TM 63859 1020 W. Huntington Dr. Hank Jong Consideration of a tentative map for a 6-unit residential condominium project. The staff report was presented and t)1e public hearing was opened. The applicant was not present, and no one spoke in favor of or in opposition to this item. MOTION: It was moved by Commissioner Baderian, seconded by Commissioner Hsu to close the public hearing. The motion passed by voice vote with no one dissenting. ROLL CALL: AYES: NOES: Commissioners Baderian, Hsu, Olson, Wen, Lucas None Arcadia Cily I'lamUng Commission 2 1lJ1lIS . . MOTION: It was moved by ChairmanHsu. seconded by Commissioner Baderian to approve TM 63859 subject to the conditions in the staff report. ROLL CALL: AYES: NOES: Commissioners Baderian. Hsu, Olson, Wen, Lucas None Chairman Lucas indicated that there is a ten-day appeal period. Appeals are to be filed by November 18th. 3. PUBLIC HEARING CUP 2005-17 81 ADR 2005-27 5417 Peck Rd. C2G, Architect representing Cement Masons S. California Trust Funds Consideration of a conditional use permit and architectural design review for an office with 20 employees and a training/vocational education facility with 150 students. Resolution No. 1737 A resolution of the City of Arcadia, California. granting CUP 2005-17 for an office with 20 employees and a training/vocational education facility with 150 students,at 5417 Peck Rd. The staff report was presented. In response to a question by Commissioner Wen. Mr. Li responded that the students are all adults and this issue has not changed with this submittal. He explained the parking requirements for schools with students of driving and non-driving age. He went on to say that the landscape would have to comply. With regard to the parking'issue, Mr. Li said that there is plenty of parking. The neighboring business that was concerned with the parking is over 700' away and it is doubtful that this use will have a negative impact on that property. The parking exceeds code requirement, thus, it should not be an issue. Per their m"Yimum request of 150 students with 30 employees, there is a potential that there could be a m"Yimum of 180 people on site and staff feels that there is ample on-site parking. Chairman Lucas said that having excess parlring per code may not be a true gauge of what is existing. Mr.Li replied that because the existing building is vacant it is difficult to make a judgment but staff feels comfortable with the situation. He did not think that the Saturday classes would be an issue because the other businesses are closed. The public hearing was opened. Arcadia City Planning Commission 3 111815 . . Michael Chaif, 14931 Califa St.. Van Nuys, explained that the 150 students is a m",Yimum number. Currently they only have Sl students. They would not have 30 employees on Saturdays; only students and instructors. With regard to the landscape, he said that there is currently landscape in the front and on.the sides of the building, and they will meet with staff to discuss the location of the landscaping. No one else spoke in favor of or in opposition to this item. MOTION: It was moved by Commissioner Baderian, seconded by Commissioner Olson to close the public hearing. The motion passed by voice vote with no one dissenting. ROLL CALL: AYES: NOES: Commissioners Badenan. Hsu, Olson, Wen, Lucas None In answer to a question by Chainnan Lucas, Ms. Butler said that this is a vocational school. Commissioner Olson did not feel that parking would be an issue. MOTION: It was moved by Commissioner Olson, seconded by Commissioner HSll to approve CUP 2005-17 & ADR 2005-27 subject to the conditions in the staffteportand adopt Resolution No. 1737. ROLL CALL; AYES: NOES: Commissioners Badenan. Hsu. Olson, Wen. Lucas None Chairman Lucas indicated that there is a five working day appeal penod after the adoption of the resolution. The resolution will be adopted on November ath. Appeals are to be filed by Nov-ember 16th. CONSENT ITEMS 4. PLANNING COMMT~SION DISCUSSION Consideration of an Addendum to the Environmental Impact Report for the City of Arcadia General Plan relating to compliance with the Transportation Master Plan as it relates to consistency with the General Plan. Ms. Butler presented the report. Arcadia City Planning,Commission 4 IUSIS . . Commissioner Baderian was in support of the proposal. He thought that it was important to have a footprint and to develop a cohesive traffic operation in the community. He asked where the funds would come from for this project? Phil Wray, City Engineer, said that a fee schedule would be established. Fees would be taken in as part ofa traffic impact intersection improvement fee and projects would be funded through these shared sources. A portion of these traffic impacts are through regional growth that the city does not have any control over and those costs would be absorbed by the city. He explained the L.a.S. D and the types of intersections with this designation. Mr. Wray went on to say that the problem that Commissioner Wen is referring to is more of a synchronization issue. The city's Traffic Master Plan looks at each intersection and determines how each intersection should run. The L.a.S. D is referring to the traffic at its peak hours and during other hours the L.a.S. could actually be better. The formula is based upon volume and capacity and it actually becomes a ratio. A L.a.S. A is veIy low volume, whereas, L.a.S. F is over capacity. Ms. Butler explained that there are some intersections that will have a back up during various times, such' as Huntington and Santa Anita during the racing season where they will fall below L.a.S. D and this is to be expected at these times. Commissioner Wen pointed out that Huntington Dr.,is a main corridor and there are aIot of elements that are beyond the city's control. He said much of the traffic is through traffic and is there a way to control this and other users who are traveling to neighboring cities? Mr. Wray said the city has some control and is working with the county. Huntington Dr. is a main east/west thoroughfare and it is the city's goal to have the signals coordinated, however, this is difficult to achieve and there are many variables. These can be addressed by adding more lanes and fiXin:g the signaling problems. The Master Plan looks at the potential growth over the next 25 years and attempts to forecast based on historical data such as building permits and various projects and the estimated regional growth, number of vehicle trips and then determine how mUch of it is city trips and how much of it is from outside. Chairman Lucas was unclear as to the purpose for this and if they'know that they are going to fall below these standards and that nothing can be done to preVent ihese. Ms. Butler explained that the General Plan is a guideline for the city. It is not mandatoIyto achieve the goals that are set. The Transportation Master Plan identified key areas and recognizes that there are problems that may need to be brought into compliance. However, the General Plan, is not so strict that it stops development. She went on to say that the Master Plan was prepared 5 years ago and at that time they anticipated looking at it after 5 years. They feel that the traffic might be reduced as a result of the Gold Line and the high gas prices. Many of the current situations might be quite different a few years from now. This process sets a planfar them and it allows them to work through property dedications and eventual widening of streets. Arcadia city Pbuming Commission 5 11/3/5 . . Mr. Wray stated that they would like to maintain the L.O.S. They have never seen a regional growth like the one in the last ten years and staff does not have any control over that growth. Much of the traffic is "pass-through" to the neighboring cities. He said that the growth in some intersection was not as much as others. This is difficult to evaluate and predict. They are'pl..nning for the future and are looking for monies or grants that can be used for these pmposes. They will need to establish fees and begin collecting them as projects are submitted. In answer to a question by Commissioner Hsll, Ms. Butler stated that the impacts will depend on what is being removed from a site because sometimes what is being replaced has less of an impact than what is existing. The city's Traffic Engineer reviews alIprojects and determines if a formal traffic study is needed. MOTION: It was moved by Commissioner Baderian, seconded by Commissioner Hsu to recommend approval of the proposed addendum and support the revised Resolution No. 6493 to the City Council Ch..irm..n Lucas was concemedthat the inference of this resoluti.on might be to downgrade the significance of how roadyway congestion or L.O.S. when confronted with development proposals. He thought they might be sending the wrong message to those who seek to develop in this community that they have little interest in the issue of L.O.S. in the streets and highways in the city. ROLL CALL: AYES: NOES: Commissioners Baderian. Hsu, Olson. Wen. Lucas None 3. RESOLUTION NO. 1735 A reolution of the City of Arcadia, California. approving Conditional Use Permit 2005-016 and ADR 2005-019 for automobile service garages at 28 W. Live Oak Ave. MOTION: To adopt Resolution No. 1735. 4. MINUTES OF 10/25/5 RECOMMENDATION: Approve Ms. Butler presented the reports. MOTION: Arcadia City Planning CommiSSIon 6 11/8/5 . . It was moved by Commissioner Baderian. seconded by Commissioner Olson approve the Consent Items and adopt Resolution No. 1735. ROLL CALL: AYES: NOES: Commissioners Baderian. Hsu. Olson, Wen, Lucas None Chairman Lucas noted that there is a five working day appeal period. after the adoption of the resolution. Appeals are to be filed by November 16.... MA'ITERS, FROM CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION Council Member Marshall snmm;..ized the upcoming projects and meetings. MODIFICATION COMMITIEE MEETING ACTIONS None MA'ITERS FROM STAFF 1. CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS 2. PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEMS Ms. Butler stated that the public hearing for architectural design review has been scheduled for the City Council's November 15'" meeting. Also, on Wednesday, November 16th, the City Council meeting where both Westfield and Caruso will be presentiIig their projects and it will be a televised She also announced that she will be retiring at the end of the year. ADJOURN TO DECEMBER 13. 2005 7: 35 p.rn. /slDonna Butler Secretary, Arcadia Planning Commission Arcll<Iia Cily PIamting Commission 7 111815 . . 3. RESOLUTION NO. 1735 A reolution of the City of Arcadia, California, approving Conditional Use Permit 200&-016 and ADR 2005-019 for automobile seIVice garages at 28 W. Live Oak Ave. MOTION: To adopt Resolution No. 1735. 4. MINUTES OF 10/25/5 RECOMMENDATION: Approve Ms. Butler presented the reports. MOTION: It was moved by Commissioner Baderian. seconded by Commissioner Olson approve the Consent Items and.adopt Resolution No. 1735. ROLL CALL: AYES: NOES: Commissioners Baderian,Hsu, Olson, Wert, Lucas None Chairman_Lucas noted that there is a five working day appeal period after the adoption of the resolution. Appeals are to be filed by November 16th. Arcadia City Planning Ccmmission 8 11/8/5 . . . CONSENT ITEMS 4. PLANNING COMMISSION DISCUSSION Consideration of an Addendum to the Environmental Impact RepoIt for the City of Arcadia General Plan relating to compliance with the Transponation Master Plan as it relates to consistency with the General Plan. Ms. Butler presented the repOIt. Commissioner Baderian was in suppoIt of the proposal. He thought that it was important to have a footprint and to develop a cohesive traffic operation in the community. He asked where the fimds would come from for this project? Phil Wray. City Engineer, said that a fee schedule would be established. Fees would be taken in as pan of a traffic impact intersection improvement fee and projects would be fimcled through these shared sources. A portion of these traffic impacts are through regional growth that the city does nOt have any control over and those costs would be absorbed by the city. He explained the L.a.S. D and the types of intersections with this designation. Mr. Wray went on to say that the problem that Commissioner Wen is refening to is more of a synchronization issue. The city's Traffic Master Plan looks at each intersection and detennines how each intersection should nul. The L.a.S. D is refening to the traffic at its peak hours and during other hours the L.a.S. could actually be better. The formula is based upon volume and capacity and it actually becomes a ratio. A L.a.S. A is very low volume, whereas, L.a.S. F is over capacity. Ms. Butler explained that there are some intersections that will have a back up during various times, such as Huntington and Santa Anita during the racing season where they will fall below L.a.S. D and this is to be expected at these times. Commissioner Wen pointed out that Huntington Dr. isa main conidor and there are a lot of elements that are beyond the city's control. He said much of the traffic is through traffic and is there a way to control this and ather users who are traveling to neighboring cities? Mr. Wray said the city has some control and is working with the county. Huntington Dr. is a main east/west thoroughfare and it is the city's goal to have the signals coordinated, however, this is difficult to achieve and there are many variables. These can be addressed by adding more lanes and fixing the signaling problems. The Master Plan looks at the potential growth over the next 25 years and attempts to forecast based on historical data such as building permits and various projects and the estimated regional growth. number of vehicle trips and then determine how much of it is city trips and how much of it is from outside. ChaiIman Lucas was unClear as to the purpose for this and if they know that they are going to fall below these standards and that nothing can be done to prevent these. An:adia CiJy Planning Commission 6 11181' . . . p . Ms. Butler explained that the General Plan is a guideline for the city. It is not mandatory to achieve the goals that are set. The Transportation Master Plan identified key areas and recognizes that there are problems that may need to be brought into compliance. However, the General Plan is not so strict that it stops development. She went on to say that the Master Plan was prepared 5 years ago and at that time they anticipated looking at it after 5 years. They feel that the traffic might be,reduced as a result of the Gold Line and the high gas prices. Many of the current situations might be quite different a few years from now. This process sets a plan for them and it allows' them to work through property dedications and eventual widening of streets. Mr. Wray stated that they would like to maintain the L.O.S. They have never seen a regional growth like the one in the last ten years and staff does not have any control over that growth. Much of the traffic is "pass-through" to the neighboring cities. He said that the growth in some intersection was not as much as others. This is difficult to evaluate and predict. They are plAnning for the future and are looking for monies or grants'that can be used for these purposes. They will need to establish fees and begin collecting them as projects are submitted. In answer to a question by Commissioner Hsll, Ms. Butler stated that the impacts will depend on what is being removed from a site because sometimes what is being replaced has less of an impact than what is existing. The city's Traffic Engineer reviews all projects and determines if a formal traffic. study is needed. - MOTION: It was moved by Commissioner Baderian; seconded by Commissioner Hsu to recommend approval of the proposed addendum and support the revised Resolution No. 6493 to the City Council. Chairman Lucas was concerned that the inference of this resolution might be to downgzade the significance of how roadywaycongestion or L.O.S. when confronted with development proposals. He thought they might be sending the wrong message to those who seek to develop in this community that they have little interest in the issue of L.O.S. in the streets and highways in the city. ROLL CALL: AYES: NOES: Commissioners Baderian. Hsll, Olson. Wen. Lucas None Arcadia City Planning Comrois>ian 7 111815 . . . : 3. PUBLIC HEARING CUP 2005-17 Be ADR 2005027 5417 PeckRd. C2G, Architect representing Cement Masons S. California Trust Funds Consideration of a conditional use permit and architectural design review for an office with 20 employees and a training/vocational education facility with 150 students. Resolution No. 1737 A resolution of the City of Arcadia, California, granting CUP 2006-17 for an office with 20 employees and a training/vocational education facility with 150 students at 5417 Peck Rd. The staff report was presented. In response to a question by Commissioner, Wen, Mr. Li responded that the students are all adults and this issue bas not changed with this submittal. He explained the parking requirements for schools with students of driving and non-driving age. He went onto say that the landscape would have to comply. With'regard to the parking issue, Mr. Li said that there is plenty of parking. The neighboring business that was concerned with the parking is over 700' away and it is doubtful that this use will have a negative impact on that property. The parking exceeds code requirement, thus. it should not be an issue. Per their rn..Yirnum request of 150 ,students with 30 employees, there is a potential that there could be arn..Yirnum of 180 people on site and staff feels that there is ample on-site parking. Chairman Lucas said that having excess parking per code may not be a true gauge of what is existing. Mr. Li replied that because the existing building is vacant it is difficult to make a judgment but staff feels comfortable with the situation. He did not think that the Saturday classes would be an issue because the other businesses are closed. The public hearing was opened. Michael Chait, 14931 Califa St., Van Nuys. explained that the 150 students is a m..Yimum number. Currently they only have 57 students. They would not have 30 employees on , , , Saturdays; only students and instructors. With regard to the landscape. he said that there is currently landscape in the front and on the sides of the building, and they will meet with staff to discuss the location of the landscaping. . No one else spoke in favor of or in opposition to this item. MOTION: It was moved by Commissioner BadeIian, seconded by Commissioner Olson.to close the public hearing. The motion passed by voice vote with no one dissenting. ROLL CALL: An:adia City Planning Commission 4 1118/S . . -' AYES: NOES: Commissioners Baderian, Hsu, Olson, Wen, Lucas None In answer to a question by Chairman Lucas, Ms. Butler said that this is a vocational school. Commissioner Olson did not feel that parking would be an issue. MOTION: It was moved by Commissioner Olson, seconded by Commissioner Hsu to approve CUP 2005-17 & ADR2005-27 subject to the conditions in the staff report and adopt Resolution No. 1737. ROLL CALL: AYES: NOES: Commissioners Baderian, Hsu, Olson, Wen, Lucas None Chairman Lucas indicated that there is a five working day appeal period after the adoption of the resolution. The resolution will be adopted on November 8th. Appeals are to be filed by November 16th. Arcadia City PlanniDg Commission S IlIlllS . . 1. PUBIJC HEARING TPM 2005-005 36 Altli St. Hank Jong Consideration of a tentative parcel map for a 3-unit residential condominium project. The staffreport was presented and the public hearing was opened. The applicant was not present, and no one spoke in favor of or in opposition to this item. MOTION: It was moved by Commissioner Olson, seconded by Commissioner Hau to close the public hearing. The motion passed by voice vote with no one dissenting. ROLL CALL: AYES: NOES: Commissioners Baderian, Hsu, Olson, Wen.,Lucas None MOTION: It was moved by Commissioner Baderian. seconded by Commissioner Wen to approve TPM 2005-005 subject to the conditions in the staff report. ROLL CALL: AYES: NOES: Commissioners Baderian, Hsu, Olson, Wen. Lucas None Chairman Lucas indicated that there is a ten-day appeal period. Appeals are to be filed by November 18th. Arcadia city P1aD1ling Commission 2 HilliS . . 2. PUBLIC HEARING TM 63859 1020 W. Hnntington Dr. Hank Jong Consideration of a tentative map for a 6-unitresidential condominium project. The staff report was presented and the public hearing was opened. The applicant was not present. and no one spoke in favor of or in opposition to this item. MOTION: It was moved by Commissioner Baderian, seconded by Commissioner Hsu to close the public hearing. The motion passed by voice vote with no one dissenting. ROLL CALL: AYES: NOES: Commissioners Baderian,Hsu, Olson, Wen, Lucas None MOTION: It was moved by Chairman Hsu, seconded by Commissioner Baderian ,to approve TM 63859 subject to the conditions in the staff report. ROLL CALL: AYES: NOES: Commissioners Baderian, Hsu, Olson, Wen, Lucas None Chairman Lucas indicated that there is a ten-day appeal period. Appeals are to be filed by November 18tb. An:adia City PlaDning Commission 3. 1I181~