HomeMy WebLinkAboutOCTOBER 23, 2007
..
.
(I
.
.
..
MINUTES
ARCADIA CI1Y PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, October 23, 2007, 7:00 PM.
Arcadia City Council Chambers
The Planning Commission of the City of Arcadia met in regular session on Tuesday, October 23,
2007 at7:00 p,m.,in the Council Chambers of the City of Arcadia, at 240 W.Huntington Drive,
with Chairman Baderian presiding.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL:
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
Commissioners Beranek, Hsu, Parrille and Baderian
Baerg
MOTION:
It was moved by Commissioner Beranek, seconded by Commissioner Hsu to excuse
Commissioner Baerg from tonight's meeting. The motion passed by voice vote with none
dissenting,
MOTION:
It was moved by Commissioner Parrille, seconded by Commissioner Hsu, to read all
Resolutions by title only and waive reading of the full body of the Resolution, The motion
passed by voice vote with none dissenting,
OTHERS ATTENDING
Councilman Peter Amundson
City Engineer Phil Wray
Community Development Administrator Jason Kruckeberg
Associate Planner Tom Li
Senior Administrative Assistant.Billie Tone
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FROM STAFF REGARDING AGENDA ITEMS
Mr. Kruckeberg distributed a revised arborist report related to Item 2.
TIME RESERVED FOR ,mOSE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISH TO ADDRESS THE
PLANNING COMMISSION ON NON-PUBLIC HEARING MATTERS - Five-minute time
limit per person
None
.
~
.
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
.
"
Commissioner Parrille said that his home on Sharon Road is in close proximity,to the
proposed site of the project on Baldwin Avenue for CUP 07-11 and, therefore, he asked
to be excused from hearing this item
Chairman Baderian aske(hhe applicant if he had any objections to excusing
Commissioner Parrille and the applicant said he did not,
1. PUBLIC HEARING CUP 07-11
1741 Baldwin Avenue
Takao Chikudate
The applicant has requested a Conditional Use Permit for operation of an after school
tutoringprogramwjth a maxiinum number of 40 students in an existing church building,
Associate Planner Tom Upresented the staff report.
Commissioner Beranek asked Mr, Li if the fact that the program was operating without a
Conditional Use Permit mentioned was the result of complaints. from residents, Mr, Li
said that' there were no complaints, the violation was discovered by Code Services
Officers.
Commissioner Hsu asked if the applicant had ceased operation since they received
notice of the code violation. Mr, Li replied that they have,
The public hearing was opened,
Mr, Neil Sheridan, owner of the property across from the proposed school since 1967,
expressed concem about traffic safety enforcement particularly on Lemon Avenue. He
said that both Baldwin and Lemon are high speed streets with no impediments to slow
down traffic. He pointed ,out that children will be walking from the proposed school at
dusk during heavy traffic hours and he expressed hope that the streets will have well
marked school crossings and traffic lights or a flashing sign for school crossings,
Chairman Baderian asked the applicant, Mr, Takao Chikudate, if.he understood and was
willing to comply with the conditions of approval in the staffreport, Mr, Chikudatesaid
that he will comply,
MOTION:
It was nlOved by Commissioner Beranek, seconded by Commissioner Hsu,to close the
public hearing,
Without objection the public hearing was closed.
Commissioner Beranek noted that the,Commissioners are assuming there will be one car
per student but the staff report says one car per three students and he asked Mr, Li to
PC MIN1ITES
10-23-07
Page 2
explain this diaancy, Mr,.Li explained that the nler in the staff report is based
on the parking requirements established in the Municipal Code,
Chairman Baderian noted that the proposed business hours are limited to 2:30 pm to
6:00 pm on Tuesday and Friday only.
Chairman Baderian asked Mr, Wray for his comments regarding crosswalks in the area.
Mr. Wray said that Lemon is wider and carries more traffic than most residential streets
yet, according to traffic studies, the volume luis' not reached the point where more traffic
control is required. He said there isa crosswalk on Baldwin which is not hesvily used
and therefore, does not require more traffic control. Further, Mr, Wray noted that the
applicant does not anticipate children walking to and from school but rather being
dropped off and picked up by parents.
Commissioner Beranek asked what circumstances require the addition of a signal or
sign,
Mr, Wray explained that traffic volume, number of pedestrians, number of accidents,
effect on the neighborhood and whether use of the street is to be encouraged are among
the factors evaluated in determining the need for a traffic signal or sign and that the
standards are set by the state,
MOTION:
It was moved by Commissioner Beranek, seconded by Commissioner HSu, to approve
Conditional Use Permit 07-11 subject totheconditioDS in the staffreport
ROLL CALL:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Commissioners Beranek, Hsu and Baderian
None
Baerg
Parille
A Resolution reflecting the decision of the Planning Commission will be presented for
adoption at the next Commission meeting, There is a five working day appeal period
after the adoption of the Resolution.
1, PUBLIC HEARING'MP 07-06rrR 07-14/ADR 07-14
SOl S. Third Ave./222E, EI Dorado
Ken Kunishima
The applicant is requesting Modifications, Architectural Design Review and an Oak
Tree Remov8I permit for a proposed 2-unit residential condominium project on an R-2
zoned property:
A. 13'-0" to 15'-0" street side yard setback along EI Dorado Street in lieu of the
required 25 ~ -0" minimum.
B, An 11'-0" street side yard setback along EI Dorado Street in lieu of the required
25' -0" minimum setback for a .second floor balcony.
PC MINIITES
10-23-07
Page 3
C,
To remove !existing oak tree with a trunk diainetlf 4' -6" and a c8tiopy spread
of approximately 80 feet,
Associate Plann~ Tom Lipresented the staffreports.
The'public hearing was opened,
Mr, Ken Kunishima., the architect on the project, complimented staff on their work on the
project. He said that the o~.er origiI1ally intended to use one unit as her retirement home
and the other for her son and hisfainily, They had hoped to remodel and enlarge the
building but they came to realize that because of parking requirements it would be better
to tear down the existing houses and rebuild with parking on the first floor and living area
on the second floor, In addition, the very large oak tree on the property creates,a number
of design problems and so they are asking for a pennit to remove it,
Chairman Baderian asked Mr. Kunishima if he had seen the letter from the,consulting
arborist. Mr. .Kunishima said that he had and he was shocked that the arborist was
recommending the addition of seven oak trees in place of the one to be reIlloved, He said
that he didn't know where they would all fit.
Chairman Baderian askedifMr, Kunishima found the compromise in the staffreport
recommendations acceptable and he said he did,
MOTION:
It was moved by Commissioner Beranek, seconded by Commissioner Parrille, to close
the public hearing,
Without objection the public hearing was closed,
Chairman Baderian noted that staff is asking for only three trees to be planted in the staff
report. Mr. Kruckeberg explained that the applicant is asking for permission to remove a
very large oak tree but that there was no way to develop the site around it. He said that
staff felt that adding seven trees to a lot of this size is excessive, hence the
recommendation for the addition of only three treeS,
MOTION:
It was moved by Commissioner Parrille, seconded by Commissioner Beranek, to
approve MP 07-06ffR,07-14/ADR 07-14 subject to the conditions in the stafl'report
ROLL CALL:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Commissioners Beranek, Hsu, Parrilleand Baderian
None
Baerg
A Resolution reflecting the decision of the Planning Commission will be presented.for
adoption at the next Commission meeting: There isa five working day appeal period
after the adoption of the Resolution,
PC.MINUTES
10-23007
Plll!"4
.. '.
y
.
.
CONSENT ITEMS
3. RESOLUTION NO. 1765
A Resolution of the Planning COmmission of tbe City of Arcadia, California, denying
Conditional Use Permit Application No. CUP 07-03/ArchiteCtural Design Review No,
ADR .07-04 for an unmanned wireless communications facility at 670 W, Orange Grove
Avenue.
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt
MOTION:
It was moved by Commissioner Beranek, seconded by Commissioner PaniUe to adopt
Resolution No, 1765, as submitted,
ROLL CALL:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Commissioners Beranek, Hsu, Parrilleand Baderian
None
Baerg
There is a five working day appeal period after the adoption of the Resolution, Appeals
are to be filed by October 31,2007,
4~ RESOLUTION. NO. 17(j6
A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Arcadia, California, denying
Conditional Use Permit Application No, CUP 07-10 and Architectural Design Review
No, ADR 07-06 for an unmanned wireless communications facility at 670 W. Orange
Grove Avenue.
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt
MOTION:
It was moved by Commissioner Beranek, seConded by Commissioner Parrille to adopt
Resolution No, 1766, as submitted.
ROLL CALL:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Commissioners Beranek, Hsu, Panille and Baderian
None
Baerg
There is a five working day appeal period after the adoption of the Resolution. Appeals
are to be filed by October 31,2007,
'pc MJNUrES
i~2J..07
Page S
) .
.
.
..
5. MINUTES OF OCTOBER 9, 2007
RECOMMENDATION: Approve
MOTION:
It was moved by Commissioner Beranek, seconded by Commissioner Parrille, to
approve the minutes of October 9, 2007, as submitted,
ROLL CALL:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Commissioners Baderian, Beranek, Hsu and Parrille
None
Baerg
MAnERS FROM CITYCOUNCll.. AND PLANNING COMMISSION
Councilman Amundson reported that the City Council is studying traffic issues and the
proposed design for the, new city hall,
Commissioner Beranekasked if joint City Council and Plaiming Commission meetings
had ever been held in the city,
Chairman Baderian said that joint meetings had been held a few years ago,
Councilman Amtindsonsaid he thought this was a good idea and he suggested a study
session,
Chairman Baderiansuggested revisiting the issue after elections,
MODIFICATION COMMITTEE MEETING ACTIONS
CommissionerParrille said there was no Modification Committee meeting today,
FURTHER MAnERS FROM STAFF
Mr, Kruckeberg reminded the Commissioners of the special meeting on Tuesday,
OctobedO, Resaid the Commissioners will meet at 4:00,pm for a tour, of the city
followed by dinner in the Council Chambers and a discussion of the design review
process and the effects it has had on what they have seen on their tour,
Pc.MINUJ'ES
10-23-07
Pogo 6
.~
',;
.
.
Mr. Kruckeberg said that the General Plan RFP bas a Thursday deadline to be followed
by interviews of prospective firms~
ADJOURNMENT to special meeting at City Council Chambers Conference Room on Tuesday,
October 30, at 4:00 pm,
7:45 p,m,
Is/JasonKruckeberg
Secretary, Arcadia Planning Commission
PC MINUTES
10'23.07
Page 7