HomeMy WebLinkAboutFindings & Action ReportRancho Santa Anita Residents’ Association
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD
Findings and Action Report
-1-
Date: January 29,2022 File No.
Project Address: 1124 Paloma Drive
Association Name: Rancho Santa Anita Residents’ Association
Applicant Name: Eric Tsang
Property Owner(s) Name: Monica and Lester Singer
Project Description:
The applicant is proposing a remodel and addition to an existing
3,165 square foot (SF) 2- story single family residence. 528 SF
will be added to the first floor and 611 SF to the second floor.
The roof height will be raised 3 feet 5 inches. The 439 SF
attached two car garage, 39 SF covered patio, 448 SF cabana
and existing landscaping will remain unchanged.
FINDINGS
Only check those that are apply and provide a written explanation for each
The proposed project X is, is not consistent with the Site Planning Principles
and Neighborhood Context Guidelines.
Explanation:
The building footprint is within required setbacks and considers
potential privacy issues of neighbors.
The proposed project X is, is not consistent with the Forms and Mass
Guidelines.
Explanation:
The building mass will remain very similar to the existing structure
when viewed from the street.
The proposed project X is, is not consistent with the Frontage Conditions
Guidelines.
Explanation: Is compatible with the existing on-site relationship to the street.
The proposed project X is, is not consistent with the Garages and Driveways
Guidelines.
Explanation:
The existing attached garage will not be changed. The property owner
has agreed to consider a wood garage door instead of the steel door
shown on the plans.
Rancho Santa Anita Residents’ Association
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD
Findings and Action Report
-2-
The proposed project X is, is not consistent with the Architectural Styles
Guidelines.
Explanation:
Has a clear and distinctive architectural style that is consistently applied
throughout the design.
The proposed project X is, is not consistent with the Height, Bulk, and Scale
Guidelines.
Explanation: The height, bulk and scale will remain similar to the existing house.
The proposed project X is, is not consistent with the Roofline Guidelines.
Explanation:
The roof plan including overhang, color, material, gables and dormers
are consistent with the chosen architectural style.
The proposed project X is, is not consistent with the Entries Guidelines.
Explanation: The front porch provides an inviting entrance.
The proposed project X is, is not consistent with the Windows and Doors
Guidelines.
Explanation:
The building facades are well articulated with windows and door types
complementary of the architectural style.
The proposed project X is, is not consistent with the Articulation Guidelines.
Explanation: The design avoids large expanses of wall plane.
The proposed project X is, is not consistent with the Facade Details Guidelines.
Explanation: Façade details consistently applied.
Rancho Santa Anita Residents’ Association
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD
Findings and Action Report
-3-
The proposed project X is, is not consistent with the Colors and Materials
Guidelines.
Explanation:
The design utilizes a pleasant color combination consistent with a
modern farmhouse design.
The proposed project X is, is not consistent with the Accessory Lighting
Guidelines.
Explanation:
The proposed project X is, is not consistent with the Additions, Alterations,
and Accessory Buildings/Structures Guidelines.
Explanation: The existing cabana will remain unchanged.
The proposed project is, is not consistent with the Hillside Properties
Guidelines.
Explanation: NA
The proposed project X is, is not consistent with the Fences, Walls, Gates, and
Hedges Guidelines.
Explanation: No changes are proposed to existing fences, walls and gates.
The proposed project X is, is not consistent with the Impervious Coverage and
Landscape Areas Guidelines.
Explanation:
The attractive front landscape will remain unchanged. The property
owner agreed to restore any front landscaping that may be damaged
during construction.
Rancho Santa Anita Residents’ Association
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD
Findings and Action Report
-4-
ACTION
Pursuant to City’s Development Code Section 9107.20.050, a Site Plan and Design Review in the
Homeowners Association Areas may be approved only if it is found that the proposed development
is consistent with the City’s adopted Design Guidelines.
APPROVED X CONDITIONALLY APPROVED DENIED
Date of ARB Meeting: JANUARY 27, 2022
Approve the plan with the condition that the Chair will review the structural
plan and confirm that the first floor plate height from 8 to 9 feet can be
accomplished without the need to demolish the existing walls.
ARB Members Rendering the Above Decision:
AYES: Boehr, Huang, Medeiros, Pappas
NOES:
ABSENT:
Reason for Denial:
There is a ten (10) day appeal period for this application. To file an appeal, a completed
Appeal Application form must be submitted to the City’s Planning Division along with a
$600.00 appeal fee by 5:30 p.m. on February 7. You will be notified if an appeal is filed.
Approved designs shall expire in one year (January 28, 2023.) from the effective date
unless plans are submitted to Building Services for plan-check, a building permit is issued
and the construction is diligently pursued, a certificate of occupancy has been issued, or
the approval is renewed. The final plans must be consistent with the approved design
concept plans and any conditions of approval. Any inconsistency from the approved
design concept plans may preclude the issuance of a building permit.
An extension may be granted by the ARB or designee, or the Review Authority that
approved the project for a maximum period of one (1) year from the initial expiration date.
Rancho Santa Anita Residents’ Association
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD
Findings and Action Report
-5-
An extension can only be granted if the required findings can be made. Please note that
acceptance of an extension request does not indicate approval of an extension.
You may visit the City’s website at www.ArcadiaCA.gov/noticesanddecisions to view this
document. If you have any questions regarding the above decision, please contact Greg
Medeiros, ARB Chairperson at 626-833-0249, ranchosaarb@gmail.com. Thank you.
c: City of Arcadia, Planning Division