HomeMy WebLinkAboutFindings and Action ReportRancho Santa Anita Residents’ Association
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD
Findings and Action Report
-1-
Date: February 3, 2022 File No.
Project Address: 500 Campesina Road
Association Name: Rancho Santa Anita Residents’ Association
Applicant Name: Ronald S. Wu
Property Owner(s) Name: Suzanne and Ronald Wu
Project Description:
Applicant is repairing and remodeling an existing single family
residence. Improvements include replacement of existing
windows, wood siding and brick veneer, converting 587 square
feet (SF) of the existing attic into a second story office and bath,
converting 190 SF of existing patio to a walk-in closet and safe
room, relocation of the existing kitchen, and conversion of a 237
SF storage area behind the garage to a pool room. Any front
yard landscaping/ hardscape will require submitting a
landscaping plan.
FINDINGS
Only check those that are apply and provide a written explanation for each
The proposed project X is, is not consistent with the Site Planning Principles
and Neighborhood Context Guidelines.
Explanation: The building footprint remains the same as the existing structure.
The proposed project X is, is not consistent with the Forms and Mass
Guidelines.
Explanation: The building mass will remain the same as the existing structure.
The proposed project X is, is not consistent with the Frontage Conditions
Guidelines.
Explanation: Is compatible with the existing on-site relationship to the street.
The proposed project X is, is not consistent with the Garages and Driveways
Guidelines.
Explanation: The existing attached garage will not be changed.
Rancho Santa Anita Residents’ Association
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD
Findings and Action Report
-2-
The proposed project X is, is not consistent with the Architectural Styles
Guidelines.
Explanation:
Replacement siding and stone veneer is consistent with the
architectural style of the house.
The proposed project X is, is not consistent with the Height, Bulk, and Scale
Guidelines.
Explanation: The height, bulk and scale will remain the same as the existing house.
The proposed project X is, is not consistent with the Roofline Guidelines.
Explanation: The roof color, material, gables and dormers will remain unchanged.
The proposed project is, is not consistent with the Entries Guidelines.
Explanation:
The proposed project X is, is not consistent with the Windows and Doors
Guidelines.
Explanation:
Windows visible from public streets will match the size and style of
existing windows including the trim which will either be maintained or
restored. Windows will include exterior applied 12” x12” grids.
The proposed project X is, is not consistent with the Articulation Guidelines.
Explanation: The design avoids large expanses of wall plane.
The proposed project X is, is not consistent with the Facade Details Guidelines.
Explanation: Façade details consistently applied.
Rancho Santa Anita Residents’ Association
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD
Findings and Action Report
-3-
The proposed project is, is not consistent with the Colors and Materials
Guidelines.
Explanation:
The proposed project X is, is not consistent with the Accessory Lighting
Guidelines.
Explanation:
The proposed project is, is not consistent with the Additions, Alterations, and
Accessory Buildings/Structures Guidelines.
Explanation:
The proposed project is, is not consistent with the Hillside Properties
Guidelines.
Explanation: NA
The proposed project x is, is not consistent with the Fences, Walls, Gates, and
Hedges Guidelines.
Explanation:
Proposed gates will replace existing gates. No other improvements are
approved.
The proposed project is, is not consistent with the Impervious Coverage and
Landscape Areas Guidelines.
Explanation: A landscaping/ hardscape plan will need to be submitted.
ACTION
Pursuant to City’s Development Code Section 9107.20.050, a Site Plan and Design Review in the
Homeowners Association Areas may be approved only if it is found that the proposed development
is consistent with the City’s adopted Design Guidelines.
APPROVED X CONDITIONALLY APPROVED DENIED
Rancho Santa Anita Residents’ Association
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD
Findings and Action Report
-4-
Date of ARB Meeting: FEBRUARY 2, 2022
Approve the plan with the condition that the landscaping plan is no longer a
part of the submittal and is not approved. Exterior applied 12” x 12” grids
will be applied for those windows identified on the window schedule with
grids. Also window trim will be maintained or restored with an equivalent
style of trim.
ARB Members Rendering the Above Decision:
AYES: Erikkson, Boehr, Huang, Medeiros, Pappas, Chan
NOES:
ABSENT:
Reason for Denial:
There is a ten (10) day appeal period for this application. To file an appeal, a completed
Appeal Application form must be submitted to the City’s Planning Division along with a
$600.00 appeal fee by 5:30 p.m. on February 14. You will be notified if an appeal is filed.
Approved designs shall expire in one year (February 3, 2023.) from the effective date
unless plans are submitted to Building Services for plan-check, a building permit is issued
and the construction is diligently pursued, a certificate of occupancy has been issued, or
the approval is renewed. The final plans must be consistent with the approved design
concept plans and any conditions of approval. Any inconsistency from the approved
design concept plans may preclude the issuance of a building permit.
An extension may be granted by the ARB or designee, or the Review Authority that
approved the project for a maximum period of one (1) year from the initial expiration date.
An extension can only be granted if the required findings can be made. Please note that
acceptance of an extension request does not indicate approval of an extension.
Rancho Santa Anita Residents’ Association
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD
Findings and Action Report
-5-
You may visit the City’s website at www.ArcadiaCA.gov/noticesanddecisions to view this
document. If you have any questions regarding the above decision, please contact Greg
Medeiros, ARB Chairperson at 626-833-0249, ranchosaarb@gmail.com. Thank you.
c: City of Arcadia, Planning Division