HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 09a - Community Input on Redistricting
DATE: March 1, 2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Dominic Lazzaretto, City Manager
By: Michael Bruckner, Deputy City Manager
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE INPUT FROM THE COMMUNITY AND
TAKE POSSIBLE ACTION ON DRAFT MAPS REGARDING THE
REDRAWING OF CITY COUNCIL ELECTION DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
Recommendation: Receive Public Input and Provide Direction on a
Final Map
SUMMARY
As a result of the 2020 Census, the City of Arcadia is required to review new population
data and to rebalance its City Council election districts. Per the Elections Code, the City
Council is required to adopt a new district map or, if appropriate, readopt the existing
district map by Ordinance following a series of public hearings.
This public hearing is the fourth in a series of several public meetings to receive input
from the Arcadia community regarding the redrawing of City Council district boundaries.
At the February 7, 2022, Adjourned City Council Meeting, the City Council selected six
maps for further consideration, which include public Maps 103, 110, and 111 and three
maps submitted by Council Member Verlato (Maps 114-116). The City Council further
established a deadline of February 22, 2022, for Council Members to submit up to two
additional maps each. Mayor Pro Tem Cheng has submitted two maps (Maps 117 and
118) for City Council consideration. No additional submissions have been made. All eight
maps have been posted on the City’s redistricting page at ArcadiaCA.gov/redistricting.
The City’s demographer has reviewed Council Member Maps 114-118 to determine
whether they meet the standards and statutory requirements established by the relevant
legal authorities for City Council adoption. The demographer has raised concerns
regarding Maps 114 and 115 because they reduce the total number of Asian majority
districts.
It is recommended that the City Council conduct a public hearing to review the draft maps
and provide direction on a final map for introduction at a public hearing on March 15,
2022.
Public Hearing to Receive Community Input on Redistricting
March 1, 2022
Page 2 of 4
BACKGROUND
City Council districts must be “substantially equal in population”. The districts are also
required to comply with the United States Constitution, the California Constitution, the
Federal Voting Rights Act of 1965, and the California Fair Maps Act. On June 15, 2021,
the City entered into a contract with National Demographic Corporation (“NDC”) to provide
Demographer Services for this effort.
Based on the 2020 Census and State of California adjustment factors, the City’s
population is 56,780. As a result, each City Council district should ideally contain 11,356
people, with a legally acceptable deviation of less than 10% from the largest district by
population to the smallest district by population (Harris v. Arizona Independent
Redistricting Commission). The table below shows the current population and
demographic factors by existing districts:
The current City Council districts have a population deviation of 16.58% (the total
percentage difference between the largest and smallest deviation 9.61% + 6.97%), no
longer meeting the statutory requirements for adoption. Therefore, new district
boundaries must be drawn.
Under the State’s Fair Maps Act, the City must hold at least four public hearings for the
community to provide input regarding the composition of City Council electoral districts.
The first public hearing was held on August 17, 2021. Under the Fair Maps Act, a
Community Workshop can be held in-lieu of a public hearing, and the City conducted that
workshop on November 10, 2021. The third public hearing was scheduled for February
1, 2022, but was continued to February 7, 2022, due to a lack of quorum for the February
1, 2022, City Council Meeting. This hearing is the fourth public hearing and the final public
hearing is tentatively scheduled for March 15, 2022. If necessary, additional hearings can
be held prior to the April 17, 2022, deadline for adopting an ordinance.
The Fair Maps Act requires that the new district maps be adopted at least 174 days prior
to the election. The next regularly scheduled municipal election is November 8, 2022,
which requires the City to adopt maps no later than April 17, 2022. Assuming that there
Public Hearing to Receive Community Input on Redistricting
March 1, 2022
Page 3 of 4
are no further delays, the City will have sufficient time to complete the redistricting
process.
It should also be noted that if the City Council is unable to adopt a draft map by the April
17, 2022, deadline, per the Fair Maps Act, the City is required to immediately petition the
Court for an order to adopt City Council district boundaries. If the City does not petition
the Court within five days after the deadline, any resident of the City may file that petition
and will be entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees and costs from the City. The Court is
also authorized to appoint a special master to assist with creating new draft maps, and
they must conduct one or more public hearings before the can Court adopt City Council
district boundaries in accordance with the appropriate statutory criteria. All costs for the
special master would be the responsibility of the City. The City Council district boundaries
adopted by the Court would become effective immediately in the same manner as if the
Court’s order were enacted by a resolution or ordinance of the City Council.
DISCUSSION
At the February 7, 2022, Public Hearing, Council Member Verlato introduced three maps
for consideration, which were referred to as Verlato Maps A-C. At the conclusion of the
discussions, the City Council directed staff to bring back public Maps 103, 110, and 111
and to have the demographer analyze those submitted by Council Member Verlato (now
labelled Maps 114-116). The City Council also established a deadline of February 22,
2022, for Council Members to submit up to two additional maps each for consideration if
desired. Mayor Pro Tem Cheng has submitted two maps, Maps 117 and 118. No other
maps have been submitted by Council Members.
The purpose of this public hearing is to receive public input on public Maps 103, 110, and
111 as well as the five Council-submitted Maps 114-118. At the conclusion of the
discussions, the City Council should provide direction on a final map to be presented for
adoption at a date selected by the City Council.
The City’s demographer, NDC, has reviewed the eight draft maps currently under
consideration and the analysis of each map was posted on the City’s redistricting
webpage at ArcadiaCA.gov/redistricting. An interactive view of all of the submitted maps
can be found at https://tinyurl.com/arcadiadraftmaps. These maps are also attached
under Attachment A.
According to NDC, Maps 114 and 115 reduce the majority Citizen Voting Age Population
(“CVAP”) of Asian-Americans from four districts to three districts. The City’s current map
and all other maps under consideration would have four majority CVAP Asian-American
voting districts. Therefore, NDC suggests that Maps 114 and 115 may present certain
challenges under Federal Voting Rights Act requirements. While Maps 114 and 115
increase the percentage of Hispanic CVAP in one district relative to any of the other
options, they do not create a majority for that presumed common interest voting group.
Public Hearing to Receive Community Input on Redistricting
March 1, 2022
Page 4 of 4
It should be noted that a final draft map must be publicly available and posted on the
City’s website for at least seven days before it can be considered by the City Council for
adoption at a public hearing. If a change is made to a map at this public hearing or any
subsequent meeting, the revised map must be posted at least seven days before it is
adopted by Ordinance.
At the conclusion of the public hearing, staff will be asking the City Council for input on
which map(s) should be considered further and to set a date for the public hearing for
final adoption. It is recommended that a single map be selected for consideration at a
public hearing on March 15, 2022.
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
The proposed actions do not constitute a project under the California Environmental
Quality Act (“CEQA”), based on Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, as it can
be seen with certainty that they will have no impact on the environment. Thus, these
matters are exempt under CEQA.
PUBLIC NOTICE
The public hearing notice was published in the Arcadia Weekly newspaper on February
17, 2022.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no impact to the General Fund as a result of this public hearing. The cost of the
entire redistricting process has been included in the FY 2021-22 operating budget and
choosing different districts will have no direct impact on City costs. Failure to adopt new
districts prior to the April 17, 2022, deadline may result in legal and court costs.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council conduct a public hearing to review the draft maps,
determine that this project is exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act
(“CEQA”), and provide direction on a final map for introduction at a public hearing on
March 15, 2022.
Attachments: “A” – Draft Maps 103, 110, 111, 114 (A), 115 (B), 116 (C), 117, &
118
District Population Deviation % Deviation Hisp Origin % Hispanic NH White % NH White NH Black % NH Black NH Asian % NH Asian
1 11330 -26 -0.23%1,536 13.56%2,107 18.60%190 1.68%7,359 64.95%
2 11042 -314 -2.77%1,672 15.14%2,676 24.23%233 2.11%6,260 56.69%
3 11371 15 0.13%1,909 16.79%1,741 15.31%315 2.77%7,218 63.48%
4 11890 534 4.70%983 8.27%1,677 14.10%177 1.49%8,860 74.52%
5 11148 -208 -1.83%1,335 11.98%1,788 16.04%128 1.15%7,702 69.09%
Total 56,781 7.47%7,435 9,989 1,043 37,399
District
CVAP
Population
Hisp
CVAP
% Hisp
CVAP
NH White
CVAP
% NH White
CVAP
NH Black
CVAP
% NH Black
CVAP
NH Asian
CVAP
% NH Asian
CVAP
1 7,224 595 8.24%2,107 29.17%184 2.54%4,283 59.29%
2 7,701 1,033 13.41%2,915 37.84%176 2.29%3,541 45.97%
3 6,641 1,124 16.93%1,728 26.02%350 5.26%3,423 51.54%
4 7,637 504 6.60%1,685 22.06%127 1.66%5,214 68.28%
5 7,360 670 9.11%1,851 25.15%36 0.48%4,737 64.36%
Total 36,563 3,927 10,286 872 21,198
City of Arcadia - Draft Plan 103 Total Population Demographics
City of Arcadia - Draft Plan 103 Citizen Voting Age Population (CVAP) Demographics
District Population Deviation % Deviation Hisp Origin % Hispanic NH White % NH White NH Black % NH Black NH Asian % NH Asian
1 11330 -26 -0.23%1,536 13.56%2,107 18.60%190 1.68%7,359 64.95%
2 11042 -314 -2.77%1,672 15.14%2,676 24.23%233 2.11%6,260 56.69%
3 11371 15 0.13%1,909 16.79%1,741 15.31%315 2.77%7,218 63.48%
4 11890 534 4.70%983 8.27%1,677 14.10%177 1.49%8,860 74.52%
5 11148 -208 -1.83%1,335 11.98%1,788 16.04%128 1.15%7,702 69.09%
Total 56,781 7.47%7,435 9,989 1,043 37,399
District
CVAP
Population
Hisp
CVAP
% Hisp
CVAP
NH White
CVAP
% NH White
CVAP
NH Black
CVAP
% NH Black
CVAP
NH Asian
CVAP
% NH Asian
CVAP
1 7,224 595 8.24%2,107 29.17%184 2.54%4,283 59.29%
2 7,701 1,033 13.41%2,915 37.84%176 2.29%3,541 45.97%
3 6,641 1,124 16.93%1,728 26.02%350 5.26%3,423 51.54%
4 7,637 504 6.60%1,685 22.06%127 1.66%5,214 68.28%
5 7,360 670 9.11%1,851 25.15%36 0.48%4,737 64.36%
Total 36,563 3,927 10,286 872 21,198
City of Arcadia - Draft Plan 110 Total Population Demographics
City of Arcadia - Draft Plan 110 Citizen Voting Age Population (CVAP) Demographics
District Population Deviation % Deviation Hisp Origin % Hispanic NH White % NH White NH Black % NH Black NH Asian % NH Asian
1 11563 207 1.82%1,440 12.45%3,023 26.14%182 1.57%6,755 58.42%
2 11665 309 2.72%1,782 15.28%1,944 16.67%247 2.12%7,522 64.48%
3 11674 318 2.80%1,954 16.74%1,772 15.18%333 2.85%7,409 63.47%
4 10731 -625 -5.50%924 8.61%1,462 13.62%153 1.43%8,011 74.65%
5 11148 -208 -1.83%1,335 11.98%1,788 16.04%128 1.15%7,702 69.09%
Total 56,781 8.30%7,435 9,989 1,043 37,399
District
CVAP
Population
Hisp
CVAP
% Hisp
CVAP
NH White
CVAP
% NH White
CVAP
NH Black
CVAP
% NH Black
CVAP
NH Asian
CVAP
% NH Asian
CVAP
1 8,100 881 10.87%2,987 36.88%201 2.48%4,011 49.52%
2 7,264 755 10.39%2,083 28.67%180 2.47%4,167 57.36%
3 6,702 1,093 16.31%1,752 26.14%340 5.08%3,512 52.40%
4 7,137 528 7.40%1,613 22.60%116 1.62%4,771 66.84%
5 7,360 670 9.11%1,851 25.15%36 0.48%4,737 64.36%
Total 36,563 3,927 10,286 872 21,198
City of Arcadia - Draft Plan 111 Total Population Demographics
City of Arcadia - Draft Plan 111 Citizen Voting Age Population (CVAP) Demographics
District Population Deviation % Deviation Hisp Origin % Hispanic NH White % NH White NH Black % NH Black NH Asian % NH Asian
1 11330 -26 -0.23%1,536 13.56%2,107 18.60%190 1.68%7,359 64.95%
2 11256 -100 -0.88%1,390 12.35%2,667 23.69%204 1.81%6,795 60.37%
3 11688 332 2.92%2,211 18.92%1,870 16.00%374 3.20%7,011 59.98%
4 11359 3 0.03%963 8.48%1,557 13.71%147 1.29%8,532 75.11%
5 11148 -208 -1.83%1,335 11.98%1,788 16.04%128 1.15%7,702 69.09%
Total 56,781 4.76%7,435 9,989 1,043 37,399
District
CVAP
Population
Hisp
CVAP
% Hisp
CVAP
NH White
CVAP
% NH White
CVAP
NH Black
CVAP
% NH Black
CVAP
NH Asian
CVAP
% NH Asian
CVAP
1 7,224 595 8.24%2,107 29.17%184 2.54%4,283 59.29%
2 7,234 753 10.41%2,773 38.33%72 1.00%3,562 49.24%
3 6,483 1,343 20.71%1,802 27.79%317 4.89%2,985 46.05%
4 8,262 565 6.84%1,753 21.22%263 3.19%5,630 68.15%
5 7,360 670 9.11%1,851 25.15%36 0.48%4,737 64.36%
Total 36,563 3,927 10,286 872 21,198
City of Arcadia - Draft Plan 114 Total Population Demographics
City of Arcadia - Draft Plan 114 Citizen Voting Age Population (CVAP) Demographics
District Population Deviation % Deviation Hisp Origin % Hispanic NH White % NH White NH Black % NH Black NH Asian % NH Asian
1 11188 -168 -1.48%1,550 13.85%1,845 16.49%185 1.65%7,456 66.64%
2 11444 88 0.77%1,613 14.09%2,930 25.60%216 1.89%6,500 56.80%
3 11505 149 1.31%1,883 16.37%1,801 15.65%323 2.81%7,272 63.21%
4 11313 -43 -0.38%1,109 9.80%1,566 13.84%192 1.70%8,294 73.31%
5 11331 -25 -0.22%1,280 11.30%1,847 16.30%127 1.12%7,877 69.52%
Total 56,781 2.79%7,435 9,989 1,043 37,399
District
CVAP
Population
Hisp
CVAP
% Hisp
CVAP
NH White
CVAP
% NH White
CVAP
NH Black
CVAP
% NH Black
CVAP
NH Asian
CVAP
% NH Asian
CVAP
1 6,915 580 8.39%1,865 26.97%170 2.46%4,245 61.39%
2 8,225 1,018 12.38%3,137 38.13%203 2.47%3,830 46.56%
3 5,562 982 17.65%1,613 29.01%134 2.41%2,760 49.63%
4 8,320 668 8.03%1,794 21.57%303 3.64%5,505 66.16%
5 7,541 678 9.00%1,876 24.88%63 0.83%4,858 64.42%
Total 36,563 3,927 10,286 872 21,198
City of Arcadia - Draft Plan 115 Total Population Demographics
City of Arcadia - Draft Plan 115 Citizen Voting Age Population (CVAP) Demographics
District Population Deviation % Deviation Hisp Origin % Hispanic NH White % NH White NH Black % NH Black NH Asian % NH Asian
1 11330 -26 -0.23%1,536 13.56%2,107 18.60%190 1.68%7,359 64.95%
2 11898 542 4.77%1,686 14.17%2,860 24.04%239 2.01%6,918 58.14%
3 11586 230 2.03%2,019 17.43%1,753 15.13%342 2.95%7,261 62.67%
4 10819 -537 -4.73%859 7.94%1,481 13.69%144 1.33%8,159 75.41%
5 11148 -208 -1.83%1,335 11.98%1,788 16.04%128 1.15%7,702 69.09%
Total 56,781 9.50%7,435 9,989 1,043 37,399
District
CVAP
Population
Hisp
CVAP
% Hisp
CVAP
NH White
CVAP
% NH White
CVAP
NH Black
CVAP
% NH Black
CVAP
NH Asian
CVAP
% NH Asian
CVAP
1 7,224 595 8.24%2,107 29.17%184 2.54%4,283 59.29%
2 8,140 1,040 12.78%2,963 36.40%197 2.42%3,895 47.85%
3 6,576 1,107 16.84%1,701 25.87%348 5.30%3,403 51.75%
4 7,263 514 7.08%1,664 22.91%107 1.48%4,879 67.18%
5 7,360 670 9.11%1,851 25.15%36 0.48%4,737 64.36%
Total 36,563 3,927 10,286 872 21,198
City of Arcadia - Draft Plan 116 Total Population Demographics
City of Arcadia - Draft Plan 116 Citizen Voting Age Population (CVAP) Demographics
District Population Deviation % Deviation Hisp Origin % Hispanic NH White % NH White NH Black % NH Black NH Asian % NH Asian
1 11330 -26 -0.23%1,536 13.56%2,107 18.60%190 1.68%7,359 64.95%
2 11345 -11 -0.10%1,774 15.64%2,749 24.23%241 2.12%6,389 56.32%
3 11839 483 4.25%1,838 15.53%1,778 15.02%310 2.62%7,704 65.07%
4 11119 -237 -2.09%952 8.56%1,567 14.09%174 1.56%8,245 74.15%
5 11148 -208 -1.83%1,335 11.98%1,788 16.04%128 1.15%7,702 69.09%
Total 56,781 6.34%7,435 9,989 1,043 37,399
District
CVAP
Population
Hisp
CVAP
% Hisp
CVAP
NH White
CVAP
% NH White
CVAP
NH Black
CVAP
% NH Black
CVAP
NH Asian
CVAP
% NH Asian
CVAP
1 7,224 595 8.24%2,107 29.17%184 2.54%4,283 59.29%
2 7,964 1,167 14.65%3,023 37.96%206 2.59%3,516 44.15%
3 6,976 1,002 14.37%1,711 24.52%334 4.79%3,930 56.33%
4 7,039 492 6.99%1,594 22.65%112 1.60%4,732 67.22%
5 7,360 670 9.11%1,851 25.15%36 0.48%4,737 64.36%
Total 36,563 3,927 10,286 872 21,198
City of Arcadia - Draft Plan 117 Total Population Demographics
City of Arcadia - Draft Plan 117 Citizen Voting Age Population (CVAP) Demographics
District Population Deviation % Deviation Hisp Origin % Hispanic NH White % NH White NH Black % NH Black NH Asian % NH Asian
1 11330 -26 -0.23%1,536 13.56%2,107 18.60%190 1.68%7,359 64.95%
2 11238 -118 -1.04%1,715 15.26%2,728 24.27%239 2.13%6,351 56.51%
3 11946 590 5.20%1,897 15.88%1,799 15.06%312 2.61%7,742 64.81%
4 11119 -237 -2.09%952 8.56%1,567 14.09%174 1.56%8,245 74.15%
5 11148 -208 -1.83%1,335 11.98%1,788 16.04%128 1.15%7,702 69.09%
Total 56,781 7.28%7,435 9,989 1,043 37,399
District
CVAP
Population
Hisp
CVAP
% Hisp
CVAP
NH White
CVAP
% NH White
CVAP
NH Black
CVAP
% NH Black
CVAP
NH Asian
CVAP
% NH Asian
CVAP
1 7,224 595 8.24%2,107 29.17%184 2.54%4,283 59.29%
2 7,758 1,057 13.63%2,961 38.17%186 2.39%3,519 45.36%
3 7,182 1,112 15.48%1,772 24.68%355 4.94%3,927 54.68%
4 7,039 492 6.99%1,594 22.65%112 1.60%4,732 67.22%
5 7,360 670 9.11%1,851 25.15%36 0.48%4,737 64.36%
Total 36,563 3,927 10,286 872 21,198
City of Arcadia - Draft Plan 118 Total Population Demographics
City of Arcadia - Draft Plan 118 Citizen Voting Age Population (CVAP) Demographics