HomeMy WebLinkAboutMARCH 23, 1954
~~ ,-,t
.
.
Council Chamber. City Hall
Axocadia, California
MarQh 23, 195~, 8:00P.M.
TO: ALL CITY COUNCILMEN AND PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
SUBJECT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
The City PlAnning Commission met in regular meeting with Chair-
man Knopp pl'es1ding.
PRESENT: Commissioners Andel'son, Balssl'. Bel'~, Knopp, P:ratt,
Robertson and SOl'enson
ABSENT: None
OTHERS PRESENT: Mansur, Nioklin, McGlasson and Talley
The minutes of the meeting of March 9. 1954, were approved as
written and mailed. '
PUI'suant to notice given, a public hearing was held on the pro-
posal to exclude mortuaries and .f'uneral parlors from the permissible
usssin Zona 0-2 and to include them as a speoial use permissible
under Section 16 of Ordinanoe No. 760 as contemplated by Resolution
No. 140. No oommnn1 cations were recel ved and no parson desired to be
heard. The Chairman deolared the hearing olosed and l'efened the
matter to the Planning Consultant and the City Attorney to draw the
neoessary resolution to recommend the amendment as oontemplated.
Pursuant to notice given. a public hearing was held on the pro-
posal to amend Section 15 of Ordinance No. 760 as it pertains to the
location of private swimming pools in relation to required yards, as
contemplated by Resolution No. 141. No communioations were received
and no person desired to be heard. The Chairman declared the hearing
closed and rafened the mattel' to the Planning Consultant and the
City Attorney to prepare the neoessary l'esolution to recommend the
amendment of the ol'dinance as oontemplated.
The request of Harold G. Keeler" 623 West Palm Drive. to divide
property was reported on by Mr. Sorenson and Mr. Knopp. The division
!'equested would create two lots 65 feet in width. As some of the
other lots in the vioinity are of comparable size, motion was made by
Mr. Sorenson, seconded by Mr. Knopp and carr1ed,that the request to
divide Lot 13, Tract No. 9282, 1nto.two 65-foot lots be recommended
for approval.
The request of Nadine Alsing. 411 East Longden Avemle. to divide
property was reported on by WII'. Sorenson and Mr. Balser. The request
was for permission to divide the North 65 feet of t he east 96.78 feet
of the west 188 feet of the south 447.s feet of Lot 111, Arcadia
Acreage Tract. and the divided portion to be sold to the owner of the
lot at 2105 Fifth Avenue. Mr. Sorenson called attention to the fact
that the approved street plan for that area provided for the extension
of Coyle Avenue westerly from F'i:f'th Avenue and if the requested divi-
sion were made there would not be a desirable lot left north of the
extension of Coyle Avenue. Motion by !III'. SOl'Bnson. seconded by Mr.
Balser and oarried" that the request to di vide be reoommended for
denial for the above reason.
The request of Norman W. Klein, 616 West Walnut Avenue. to
divide property was reported on by Mr. P:ratt and Mr. Robertson. The
request was for 'permission to divide the Westerly portion of the'West
138 feet of the east 276 feet of the north 367 feet of Lot 1, E. J.
Baldwin's Addition, to oreate a lot having a frontage of 55 feet on
- 1 -
3-23-54
r
,~
.'
.
.
Walnut Avenue increasing to .a 69-1'oot width at the rear porMon 01'
the lot. To accomplish such a division a considerabie portion of the
existing dwelling would be required to be removed. Mr. Pratt stated
that there was a good possibility ot Rosemarie Drive being extended
westerly to provide a street at the rear po:rtion 01' the lot in ques-
tion and that. in his opinion, the 1":ront portion of the lot should
not be divided but .that the owner should wait until Rosemarie Drive
is extended and then divide the real' portion into two lots. He alao
stated that. in his opinion, the SS-foot frontage on Walnut Avenue
would not be a desirable lot. Motion by Mr. Pratt, seconded by Mr.
Robertson and carried. that the request to divide be recollllll9nded for
denial for the reasons above stated.
/
.-.
,
The request of' Manuel G!U'cla. 1110 South Eighth Avenue, to divide
property was reported on by Ml". Berky and Mr. Balser. The request
was to divide the South 11$.63 feet of the north 231.25 feet of Lot 79,
Tloact 808, into two lots each having a frontage of 57.81 feet. A
communication from Alfred H. Allen pointed' out that even though a simi-
lar request had been denied in August. 1953. it was his belief that
sl,1.oh a division with a new house constructed on one portion of the lot
\'tould be an 1mprovemant to the neighborhood. Mr. ~~ansUl' reported that
other lots in the vicinity had been similarly divided. Motion by Mr.
Balser, seconded by Mr. Berky and carried. that the request be recom.-
manded for, approval. ,'.." .." ,''co J,;' .,'1,",., :_. ,.....'" ,._', ",' <0," - ,
The request of Lee F. Bristol, 1033 \Vest Duarte Road, to divide
property was reported on by Mr. Anderson and Mr. Berky. The request
was to divide Lot 140, Tract No. 2731. into two lots each having a
frontage ot 70 feet on Duarte Road. An existing house on the lot VlIlS
proposed to be moved to give proper olearance for the new lot line.
Motion by MI'. Anderson. seconded by Ml'. Berky and carried. that the
request be recommended for approval subjeot to removal of the existing
build1ng to give the required clearB.IlDEl from all lot lines.
The request of Henry F.' M8Ilch. 2321 Holly Avenue, to divide prop~
erty was reported on ~1 Mr. Anderson and. Mr. Knopp. The request was
to d1 vide the North 124 reet or the sou:th 427 reet or the west 246
feet of the' east 276 feet of Lot 4, E. J. Baldwin's Addition, into
three parcels facing RosemBI'ie Drive, the westerly two parcels each
ha ving a frontage of 75 feet and the corner parcel a frontage of 96
feet. Existing buildings on the lot were 'proposed to be removed to
provide proper clear~e from the new lot lines. Ml'. Mauch propoaed
the erection of a new dwelling on the corner parcel with an attached
garage to be approx!ma telylO feet from the south lot line. Motion bY'
MI'. Anderson, seconded by Mr. Knopp aDd c8%'rled. that the requost to
divide bEl recOlIIIlIended for approval subjeot to the removal of tho exist-
ing buildings and that a variance be granted to permit the attached
garage on the corner parcel to be located not less than 10 feet from
the south lot line. 'subjeot to the approval ot the adjacent property
owner to the south.
The request of David R. McCrery to di vicleproperty on \'Vest Walnut
Avenue between No. 537 and NO. 617. being the ,East 192 feet of the west
256 feet 01' the south 253.62 feet of Lot 13. Tract No. 4467, into
thl-ee lots !laving a frontage of 64 feet each on Walnut Avenue, was
reported on by Mr. Berky and Mr. Knopp. The tlWee lots will meet area
requirements and the 64-1'00t frontage 113 camp~able to other lots in
the vicinity. Motion bY Mr. Berky, seoonded b~ Ml". Knopp and carried.
that the request be reoommended for approval.
The request of Leonard W. Bender, 1720 Sou.t,;h Santa Anita Avenue,
to divide property was presented and d1scussed b-y t~ COmmission. The
request was to divide the East 10 feet of the s~~ 77~2$ feet of the
north 308.$0 1'eet of the west 23~ feet of Lot 30, ~~adia Acreage
Tract, and to add the 10-foot strip to two lots f~~~ Louise Avenue
- 2 -
3-23-54
rr
.
.
owned by the applicant and whioh were apPl'oved by th1s Commission on
Octobel' 28, 1952. Motion by r.~. Robertson, seconded by Mr. Anderson
and carried. that the request ,be l'eoommended for approval.
The request of Robert Stettler and George Le'V!'is to divide prop-
erty on Oakhurst Lane, oonsidered by this Commission at the last
meeting, was reported on by the City Engineer. The request was to
divide Lot 5. Tract 13487. at the dead end of OAkhm'st Lana. a private
street, into two lots having .frontages of' 17..$4. f'eet and 26.89 f'eet,
but widening out 1;0 approximately 80 feet at the building line. The
report .from the Engineer reoommended that the applicants be required to
construot oertain check dams and bank proteotion along the drainage
ditch aoross the rear of this property near, the Santa Fe Railroad
right of way. Mr. Pratt stated that, in his op1n1on. even thougp the
lots have a reasonable width at the building line, the narrow .frontages
on the private street would not be desirable. Motion by Mr. Pratt,
seconded by Mr. Berky and oarried, that the request. to d1 vide the
property be reoommended for denial and that the report of the City
Engineer be forwarded to the Building Department and that the Vlork
Oalled for in the report be l'equired to be performed before any permit
is issued for any construction on the lot.
A tentative map of Traot No. 18702, located partly in the City of
Sierra Madre and partly in the city of Monrovia, and Tract No. 20211,
both tracts being located DOl'th of Elkins Avenue and east of santa
Anita Avenue. were l'eported on by the Subdivision COlllll1ittee. Reports
from the City Engineer, the Planping Consultant and the Water Superin-
tendent were read. The City Enginear called attention to the serious
nood hazard and recollllllSnded that the subd1 videI' be required to submit
tentati ve plans for the cont.rol of' debris and storm l'UDoff from Elkins
Canyon and any other oanyon oontributing now into the subd1vision.
He also recommended that the right of way of Elkins Avenue be in-
oreased to 70 feet to provide space for oons truction of a proposed ,/
st01'lll drain. The Planning Consultant called attention to the fact
that proposed Canyon Road was shown as 40 feet in width and that vari-
ous streets would have veI7 steep grades. He also stated that the area
should have oareful study regarding drainage problems and water supply
problems. The Water Superintendent stated, that the problems involved
in pl'ovid1ng water service were approaching solution but were .oot yet
assured. Mr. Pratt st,ated that some of the lots had less than a 75-
toot frontage and should be redesigned; also 0 if the area in Sierra
f4adre 1snot annexed to the City of' Arcadia>> lot lines shoulg. be re-
designed to fall on the city boundaI7 line. He also stated tha.t that
portion of Tract No. 18702 within t1).e Oity of Arcadia would have no
outlet to a publ1c street until the portion \vithln the City of Siert'a
Madre had been approved. Motion by Mr. Prattp seconded by Mr. Balser
and carrled~ that the tracts as submitted be recommended for denial
with the suggestion that they be resubmitted in a 1'om to comply with
all of the recommendations included in the above mentioned report.
The revised tentative map 01' Tract No. 1961,.7, located on Fifth
Avenue north of Camino Real. was reported on by the Subdividon Com- j'
m1ttee. A report from the City Engineer set out improvements re-
quired. Communications b-om Al.fred H~ Allen" subll1vider, and G. L.
Robb1i1s" brokeI', pointed out some of the conditions encountered in
assembling such a subdivision where some lnd1 vi chlal. owners are not
willing to enter into the scheme and are not w1l1~ng to bear their
just share of the expense and \U'ged that the City adopt an ordinance
whereby ch.tmges could be collected .from owners an4 raf'unded to the
subdivider in those cases where particular parcelS of ground are not
a part of the subid1vls10n. The revised map confg;Rl1s substantially
to the o1"ig1nal tentative map except that, area on ,the west side of
Fifth Avenueo ol'ig1nally shown as five lots of 79-foot .frontage each,
has been changed to six lots of 67-foot frontage eac:)l. All lots 1n the
- 3 -
3-23- 54-
r
.
.
tract contain the minimum required 81>ea and the six lots mentioned
oonform with lots pI'eviously approved on the east side of' Fifth Ave-
nue. F11'th Avenue near Camino Real had been changed from the
original 4.o-:root width to ,48 feet. The map also showed a one-foot
stI'lp along the westeI'ly side of' Fifth Avenue to be I'etained by the
subdivider. Motion by Mr. Pratt, seconded by Mr. Robertson end ClU"-
1'ied. that approval of tentative map be reoommended subject to the
subdivider deeding to the City the fee title to a one-foot strip along
the westerly side of Fifth Avenue between Lots 15 end 16 and between
Lot 15 and Camino Re81.
'I'he subdivider informed the Commission'that there would be a
future application :for a lot split on the property located at the
northeast corner of Cam'no Real and proposed Fifth Avenue.
The tinal map of Tract No. 20108. located on Fifth Avenue north
and south of Leda Lane, was presented for oonsideration. A report
from the City Engineer I'ecommended that before final aoceptanoe. the
City require a letter from the o\mer of the pI'Operty at the south end /'
of' Fifth Avenue. agreeing that the dzoainage water fi'om Fifth Avenue
be allowed to f'low on to the property until such time as the street
is extended to the south. Motion by Mr. Pratt. seconded by Mr. Bal-
ser and ce.zarie<4 that final approval of' tha tract be recommended;
also that the strip deeded to the City along the west side and the
north end of Fifth Avenue. as shown in Tract No. 19688. be dedicated
for street purposes.
. The' COlll.rl1cslvn considered the matter 01' 'I'l'aot No. 1885S.
located at the nortih end of V/ataon Drive and Lee Avenue. and raf'erred
back to the Commission by the City Council to consider a letter from
fAary R. Moore. 1625 south Second Avenue. stating that she wished soma
01' her propartyincluded in this subdivision. A previous plan. an /
shorm on Tract No. 16970. for Bubdi vid1ng the same area had included
a part of Mrs. Mo~re' s and other property but had been abandoneq..
The layout of the tl'act under oonsideration provided more than the
required area in the lots and additional territory was not required
nor desired by the subdivider. Motion by Mr. Robertson. seconded by
f~. Pratt and oarried, that in the opinion of the Commission the
present plan of subdivision is satisfactory and no area is being
land-locked and that the prior recollllllElndatton for approval by this
Commission 1s hereby reafr~ed.
A tentative map of Tract No. 20316. located on Third Avenue /
north of C8ll11no Real. was referred to the Subdivision Committee f'or
investigation and report.
A tentative map of Traot No. 20290, looated at the north end of "
Bella Vista Drive.was referred to the Subdivision Committee for 1n-
vestigation and report.
A tentative map of Traot No. 19888. located on Le ROY Stree~
west of Oak Avenue in county territoI'Y. was submitted by the Regional
Planning Commission for recommendation. Motion by Mr. Anderson.
seconded by Mr. Berky and oar1'led. that the map be reoommanded for
disapproval because it does not lI10et the standards l3et up by the City
01' Arcad1a in regard to street widths. lot wS.dths ~ci lot areas.
The request of' E. J. Gengler. 12.50 Holly Avenq,. 1io d1 vide prop-
erty was referred to Mr. Sorenson and Mr. Ba1s,er to ~yeatigate.
A communication from the City Clerk advised th!it :the City Counoil
had requested the PlAnni~ Commission to 1n1tia~e p~9peed1ngs to amend
the Zoning Ordinance to perm1t not lI10re tlum two-sf;9-p" construction
in Zone R-3. The Ohairman referred tha matter to t~' P~ann1ng Con-
sultant for study and report.
- 4 -
3-23-5"4.
v
.
.
A communication from L. R. Howell. 1223 South Santa Anita. re-
quested a variance fi'om the rear yard requirements to permit an
add! tion to an existing dwelling to extend wi thin 13 feet of the rear
property 11na. Ample rear yar~ space is available at the side of tho
PI'Oposed addition. Motion by Mr. Sorenson. seconded by Mr. Balser
and oarried, that the l'equest be Pecommanded for approval as being in.
'substantial compliance with the Zoning Ordinance.
The request of Thomas, J . Finnerty. 1727 South Second Avenue. to
divide property was referred to Mr. Berky and r~. Knopp to investigate.
The~Planning Consultant submitted a report on the application of
the Industrial Brush ComplUl7 for a varianoe to allow the entire East
40 feet of Lots 34, 3$ and 36. Block 79. Santa Anita Tract. to be used
for manUfacturing purposes and restricting Lot 3. Block 79. for 01'1'-
street parking, and Pecommending the granting of the variance. rl!otion
by Mr. Robertson. seoonded by Mr. Anderson and oarried, that the City
Attorney be instructed to prepare the necessary resolution to recom-
mend the granting of the variance.
!iiI'. Egll Hopenpresented a map of Tract No. 19$89. looated south
of Foothill Boulevard. west of Ranoho Road, on which final approval
was recommended at the last meeting and objected to the condition of
such approval requiring that ourbs and gutters be constructed in the
portion shown as future street along the Santa Fe Railroad right of
way. Because of the faot that the tentative map had bean approved
withoutsuoh a requirenent. motion was made by Mr. Pl'att, seconded by
r~. Anderson and oarried, that the motion for approval made on
MSJ.Och 9. 1954. be emended to eliminate the requiremant that the future
street portion be improved.
In the matter of' an ordinanoe to establish .future charges on
pl'operty not entering into a subdivision, recommended by Mr. Allen and
f.iI>. Robbins. the Chairman instruoted the Subdivision Committee, the
Planning Consultant, the city Engineer and City Attorney to work with
developers with an idea of drawing an ordinance for suoh regulation
and to report back to the Commission.
The Planning Consultant submitted an oral report in connection
with Resolution No. 133, !'ecnm_,.,r'l11'1g oertain ohanges In the Zoning
Ordinance and the creation of three commeroial zones, the adoption of
whiCh resolution had been delayed pending the submission of a map
showing the location of the proposed new zones. He raco:mmanded that
certain changes be made in the previously proposed amendment, particu-
larly in the designa.tion of the zones as follows: 0-0, professional
ol~ice zone; C-l.restricted commercial zone; C-2. general co:mmercial
zone; and 0-3 commarcia1 parking zone. Under his recommendation,
there would be no change made in Zone C-3 and the only ohange in Zone
C-2 would be the addition of automobile parking requirements. He also
recommended that the proposal to limit construction height to two
stories in Zone R- 3 be made a part of this amendment and that one
public hearing be held on the entire matter. He stated that he had
met with representatives of the Chamber of OOlllll1erce and the Realty
Board and others and discussed the propos~d changes in the commercial
zones and that such changes had mat with their favor. The Chairman
requested the Planning Consultant to,prepare a writt~n report' setting
out the proposed nsw zones and their 'particular uses and that such
report be duplicated and a copy mailed to each oommis~loner for study
and review.
0/
Mr. Sorenson as Chairman of the Budget ,Committe,!;lp;t'esented his
report and the proposed budget for the year 19$4--55 as' .follows:
- 5 -
3-23-.154
,.. ." .
.
.
Regular employees - part time.
Temporary employees
Consultant Services
O.f.fice' supplies
Stationery and printing
Travel and tran~partation
O.f.ficial meetings
Retirement f'Und
Memberships
Total proposed budget
Approved budget .for 19~3-S4
$ 2040.00
1500.00
2049.0()
So. 00 .
2,$0.00
:200.00
1000.00
-, 212.00'
50"00
$ 1942.00
:&; 1~02.00
Motion by Mr. Balser, seoonded by 1IIr. Berk;r and carried, that the, .
report be accepted and reoommended .for approval by the Oity Oouncll~
The Oity Attorney presented Resolution No. 1411. and read the .find-
ings and recommendations which were discussed by the Commission. .
Motion by Mr. Robertson, seconded by Mr. Pratt and oarried. that the
reading o.f the f'ull body o.f the resolutIon be waived. Motion by Mr.
Berky. seoonded by Mr. Anderson and carried; that Resolution No. 1411.
be adopted.
There being no further busines, the meeting adjourned.
fWv~
L. M. TALLEY
Seoretary
- 6 -
3-23-,$4