HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPTEMBER 28, 1954
.'
..
.
.
Counoil Chomber. City RaIl
Arcadin, CO! ifornie.
BoptombCl%' 28, 1964
1'01 AU. C!'1Y COUI'lClUlEN AND PLAmlDlG COHNISSIONERS
SUBJECTs PIJOOJ:mG COMlUSSIOIl L1nrorES
Tho City PlonniDg COl!lIIIilaaion lII8t in regular lII11etiJIg uith ChlILi:roon Baloer
praoidillg.
PRESEHT, CGllllIIiooionore illIloer. KnopP. Pratt IUld Iilobertoon
ABSEN'l'. Cll:!llllllelO1Jlll's AJuleroon. Daly mul Sorenson
OTIlERS PRESE!l'l1 Hulco, Hloltlin. Rogera, !:1eGlClBoon l!IId Talley
Tho minute~ of tho lilooting of Soptember 14.. 1964. <>ore approved Oll witton
aI:Id 1Illl1leCl.
Purouo.n"t to notioo given. a publio hearing alO hold on tho nppl1oatiOll of
AndoraoZl-Robb1nll CompnlV tor Q 1I0U VIlriaDDo to allaw tho trout portion ot tho
property at 140 Eallt IluIlI'ta Rond 'to be ulId 0.11 a roal llatllte otfioo. !.!zo. IIlgo
"UElreoD. 118 East D1mrto Rond. protested o.nd stated thnt liIuoh 0. uno mull!. have Q
bad effeot Oil! tho latoJr devolopmsDt of the blook. Fred ll2ooor. 141 Eaat Duarte
RO"'d. proteotod on the ~rOlUlli tho.t it would be an Ulldoa1rnblG outlook t'l'llDl bie
residenoe. that thoro 1'1Ould be the O\l!!tOl!l!lry eigns lU'ound tho roo.l eetato
offioe. a.nol. eaked thQ-t no ohcmge in lIon1ng be =ol.e until the ollt1re bloclt 10 oono
aldorexl and ohanged at ODC t1lll.e. No other peroon deeired tc be hoard. Tho
Chairman deolt>.red the hoa.r111!!; oloBed.
II report of the Plann1ll(!; CoruaultaDt stated that. 1Il hill opinion. the blook
011 Dwltrto Road botlll9on Firct Avenue allli Seoond Avenuo would be reoomnollliod tor III
lIono ohrmgo 111 oOlUl8otlon with the tour nlSW Illllllll1OJ'o1&J. zonell lU1d that tho roo
<}ueetsd real oote.te of1'10e uee would be in koop1ng with fII.'DJ 0_1'0181 Jone that
might be reoommonded and that be e.... no objllOtiOll to the grantlllg of the vari-
anoo. A report trom tho City EJ:rglnoer reo_lIllod that 11' the ...."tanGo 'mIro
grnntQd. ton toot be ded10atod tor the wldon1l:lg of Duarte Road. It 1l!IIlll tho eou.-
sensus of opinton ot the COJ!llll1elllon that tho area _s no longoI' lIuita.blofor R-l
purposell and thnt the gnlnt1.llg of the preeeut requoet 1flluld bo 1n conformity
with /lI1V future aoning that m1ght be rOll_ndod. Motion by f4r. RobertDon.
oooondod by Mr. Pratt rand tm!lrdmoullly oarriod by roll call vote. that the City
Attornoy be 1JlBtl'lloted to draw tho neoeeeary resolution to J'GOOllllll!lIlJi th" gr.llt~
ing 01' the varillnoe llIIdor thll fol101l'ing 001lli1tiOllllf
1. 'fhat the crrmor dedicate ton feet for the widening ot Duarte ROlld.
2. That tho VllJ'ial1Oll be Um1ted to a period of Cl118 year from thlll
effeotive date of the var1&UlOo.
Tho request of J. BOlllJ:l).n. 838 East Cam1no Real, to dlvido propel"ty. hold
over from lo.st moeting liaS oonaidered. !fr. Pratt !!tated that Glthovgb tho re~
quested division V/l)uld oreate lote emaller than otherll in tho v1cin1ty. llGVerllll
of the other lots now ooDtllined two residenoes end that the dividiag at thio lot
and the construotion of 11 n_ residence would be in lt80ping with thtl genoml
C1ppenrllnoe of tho ne1gh.borhoocl. Motion b;y Hr. Pratt. lleQondcsd by 1lIr. Knopp elM
oarrlod. that pel'lD1os101l to divide the ElIla1: 118.76 teet of the south 206.62 foot
of lot 69. Tract fila. 808. into two late. being the west 69 feet nnd the east
69.76 1'"1; of tho above a.esorib04 parcel. be rocOI:IIJ\OJldod for approval subjeot to
the tollcr.rl.ng oonditlol18l
1. That l1 sewer lateral be prov1ded tor the addltiolllll lot.
- 1 -
9/26/64
,>
.'
.
.
2. Thet Q foe o~ ~26.00 be pl1id into the Reoreation Fund tor the
net< lo't.
s. TbClt n final Ll!1p. preparod by a lioonaod Survoyor or oivil
ellgineor. be rued uith the City.
The request of D. C. V/healer, Jr.. 226 East SyollIilore Avenue, to divide Lot
11, Traot No. 12634, into 1:t70 paroels was oonsidered. Tho roquested dividoD
tlould oreate e. n_ lot 64.5 fet}t by 140 feet. faoing on 8yo=r6 Avenue. loaving
the rElIU" of the property trlth o.ooeos only throvgh a 20=1' Dot strip from S;yownoro
Avenue. tlr. Pra.t't otllted that. in h1s opinion, such a division definitely
should not be granted in this ~icule.r orGS.. Ur. Rob1ilrtson agreed that 1't
uould be an IDjuot;ioo to othor property 0l1I10ra in the neighborhood. Mr.
illloslor oto.ted that; he felt the proparty mlS damaged by the zoniDg on FoothiU
Boulevurd ~oh 1111cnm oOllllllllroial uae fe.oiIljl; Foo'thill and pnrki1ll'; in tho relU'
adjaoent to hie lot. He stated that he intendod to build a house on tho front
portion of the lot; and that his o.on intended to bulld on the rear portion. It
'me tho opinion of tho COllllllioeion 'that this oollld be done without division o~
=arohip of tho lot. Motion by Mr. Pratt. seoonded by Mr. Ro!lel't;oon and onr-
ried. that the request to divide be reoammanded for denial.
Thll rflquest of fII1lclrod C. Ferris, 916 La Cadena Avenue. to divide propsrty
wall aonsiderooo Tho request lltls to d1vids five feot fl'OlI! tho north end of the
property e't 916 La CIl.dena 'to be eddGd to the present &6-foot lot ~t 909 1.8
Cndena. Motion by 1!r. Robertson, sooonded by Hr. Prat't o.nd oarried. that permis-
sion to divido the South 5 fest of the north 60 feet of lot 9, Tl'a.ot No. 3480.
be reoOllllilonded for npproVlll.
Tho Commission ooneidorad a deoision on the requeot of Sam V. Gordon and
Joe V. Gordon 1'01' 0. Z0119 varianoe to allcm the oonntruo'tion of threo single
houseo in tho rear of property loooted at 802 Borth Firl$'t Avenue. A report from
tho Pltlnning Consul to.nt pointed GU~ that the o.pplioanlll had not met th8 require-
manta of OrdillalloOs Ro. 760 1n that they hed submitted no plot pion and mado no
etntemant BIl to traot restriotions and deemadit 1JIadvillllb10 to approve the
varinnoe at the pr8een-t timo. 81lm V. Gordon stated that thoro wero no deed
1'8l1tr101:ions on the property and 'that ,there r.<lS lllIlple room to oonlltruot add1-
Mone.l dmllllnga 'to provido additional revenue from the property. !'Jr. Roborteon
lltated he agrood that ~e property mc not properly 1I0nedBs H=l. The Chairman
ordered the matter held for further oonoideration at the !Ian. moetillg and
instructed the opp110tUlts to submit a plot plon llhomng the looation of $11
buildings on tho property and the lCHIation of proposed buildillgs.
'the COJlllDiaBion cOIls1dered 0 deoiBion on the request of Fre.nco!l8 E. and
l!nrtin J. Stately for a zOlla variance to allow tho ex1st1rlg dwolliDg at S22
Huntington Plaoe to b1il usod Be a lllIIltiplo c1mJ1l1rlg. A report from the Plann1n$
COllSul wnt oalled atten-tion to the faot thot Cln application on the samu. prop-
orty"as doDiod in January, 1960. Also, that the preson-t applioation gave no
ini'orEntion all to deed reatriotiOllB but; thot a oopy of dee4 ros~iot1onB. sub-
Illitted with tho 1960 application. indioated that tho property was reotrioted to
ainglo lc.ml1y residenoo use until July 1. 1964 and that he 8/ilW no justification
for tho granting of tho 1l0De verinl1oeo Mr. Robertson otated that. in his
opinion. oirlNlll3taDOea surroundiag the property were lID different than at the
time of the pi'~0J' application. A report from the City EDgin",,1' stated that it
tho vnri=e mro granted. EL 5.foot strip should be required i:o be dedioateeS for
tho tri.d"ni~ o:f Huntington Plaoe. Motion by lIT. Robsrtson, seoonded by lAr. Knopp
and unan1I!lous1y oarried by roll oall vote, that the City At'to1'1ley be 1notrullted
to dra~ the neossoary resolution recommending the denial of the applioation.
The COl!liuisaion oonsidered 11 deoidon on th.1e requ8st of Dr. Emanuel Duke
rOI" B ohllllge of sona f'ran Zone R-1 to Zone R=3 Or Zone c..1 on property at 316
Hunt1ngton Ple.oe. A report from the Planniug Consllltant stated that this prop-
erly 11nQ adjaaent to the above Dlantioned property 191' Mr. Stately end that similar
oondit1onll app11ed" lUl.d that he had previously stated there VlllII an abundan08 of'
R-g zoning in Arondia wh10h 18 not now beiag used ~or R=3 purposes. Aleo, that
'.:It 2 CJ
9/Z8/54
.
.
there W8 no Clommeroio.l ZOIled property M&J' the subjoat property llJld he l'ClCl_
mendod that the appl1cl1tiOll be denied. A report trQlll the City EDgiJlaor
reClommanded that 11' tha Il.ppliOll.tiOll wore granted f1ve feet: be reqtlired to be
dodioated tor the widesWlm of. BUDtiJlgton Plaoe.- Mr... RobertsODulltated that. in
hla op1l110n. thfJ 8lUOO oonditioDll applied all thlll pl"opsrq- a8 ...re fOUJld to apply
to the Statoly property. JIot101l byl.lr. Robertooll. /IIooOllde4 by Mr. bopp and
uJll.\nitnoullly 0IU"1'1od b)' roll Dall 'f'Ote. that the C1ty AttoMlllJ be 1nIl'tJ'uoted to
propaJ'e the Dl'loossary rellOlutlol1 to I'eo_na the dOl11Al of the appl1oation.
Tho COIIIIIl1IIoiClll oODSidered the application of the Lo. Aageles !vt Club tor
a :i'U'd varianae to pem1t the GrootiOD at lUI outdoor adftrt1ll1ll@: nruature at the
iDtersootioJl of BUDtillliton Drive all4 Colorado Plaoe. The appl1catiOll had
origiaally be"n 8UbIll1tted to the Kod11'ioation c-itteo aDd wa. ref"rred to the
Collllll1odOll by the lIodU'loatlO1l COllll1ttee without reCl~""I~..tlon. lIP. DOll Davis
of Foeter and nohar Co. represented 1;be appl1aaut and .taW that the prDpoll8d
o18n would be 12 foot by 4.1 teet 111 abe ann 'WOuld 'be uaed to e.dvertlee allot
the oporetiOJlll of the Lo. i\JIgelell Turf' Club. iDOlud1Jlg thoir Lab Arrcmhed
1nt,,"sto. Tho oketoh lIublllltwd with the appUcsatiOll ehond the looatloJl of the
dgn to be 70 feet: mlet of the 1I1terseotiOll of Bantll11;ton Drive and Colorado Plaae
o.nd the 0Dd8 of the 81gn struoture 'WOuld be approlti1ll:e.tely 26 feet from ColOl'Qdo
Plaae and the 8111ll!l diataDOe tram BUJlt1J:lgt0n Drive.
The l'equeRed variaDoe 1$0 tJ'Olll the prov18ioll8 01' Zone $.1 of Ordine.l!.oe !Io.
760. whiah require" that DO otruoture other than a gaool1ne fl11ilrg lltatioa aon
be looa1oed U8nrOl" tbaJI 160 feet frCllll Huntington DrlVll. It 'IIlIlI the opinion of the
CoIml1l1don that f1Uoh a struotwo ill the lfUld8oapod uen .ClII1d IIIlU' the beauty of
tlu; ontJ'tltlllIil to the Turf Club. 1Ir. Robert Strub. reprellentillg the Turl' Club.
ot8te4 that. iD his opinion. the ellthetio value ohould not 'be OOllllidol'od beoause
similar USOIl ware 4utOllllLtlonlly on tho 0-2 proper1;y aoroae the etreet lUId 111 the
SSlIlC vioini t1. Uotion by J&r. Knopp. seo01ldocS by I!r. Pl'lltt and UII8J11ml1uolll oar..
ri04 by roll call vote. that in viev of the requiramel11;ll at Zoniag Ordl_e Na.
160 th" applicatlon be denied.
A revised tentative map of Tract No. 20642. looated south ot Foothill
Boulevo.rd and enst of &lZ1 Carloll Road _Il oOZlllidared. The Beoretary etatoed that
the owner of the property had requosted that the IIIIIp be altered to narrow the
troDtage of Lot 9 by o.pproximately 10 fest e.nd iDoretloe the frCllltage of Lot 11 1A
tho same a&'l0Ullf::. AlBo. that tho frontage of Lot 3 be deoreue4 by 0_ 8lIlllUJ1t
aDd that Lota 1 IlD.d 2 be 1I1Oree.aed. A report fra the Clty EJlgi_ etated thai;
Loto 1 aDd 2 'tlUJ'O 1888 thllJl 76 teet in width aDd that it o.ppeared that Lot 11
oontaiDed lees than the required. utla. Be also poi1lttK\ out that the impro_nt
of portiON!l marked "future street" ehould be aODddere4 at this tiJMJ 111 order
not to plaoo on undue burdon on the future .lIbdiY1der of pl"operty to tho east.
Mr. Robertson otated that tho rovised. map .... e.n impro_nt emsr the original
map but that Lote 1 aDd 2 nro still sub.tandard a. to width snd that, in hill
oplnion. the partiaular locality required better pl&IIDiDg. 1Ir. Pratt stated
that he thagght M oQre11 plan of the vloinity Ilhould 'be propued 1\114 otudied
before 111I3' aotieu wall takan on thill eudirldCll. Motion by Mr. Robertson.
lleooJ1ded by 1Ir. Pratt and ClIIlJ'J'ied. that a revislld tentative map of Traat Ho.
20642 bo rooomnended tor denial for the rea!lOll that Lotll 1 and 2 lU'O 8ubatandllrd.
and that tho City BJlgIJ!1lor and PIllJllliJlg CODllultant be requenod to lItudy and
proeont M OVllro.ll ple.n of the ueo..
A final mp ot Traat No. 2~16. located on Third Avenue north of CllDdao
"enl. a8 oonsidoNld. Aotion on this traot had bean held ovor l'l'OllI tho previouo
lIWetlJlg peDdillg tho reoeipt of street pro1'llell. A report from the City E:ngin88!"
otated tluLt prOfile. had been reoe1ved and that t.Ius gradell ehOlll1 on tho ell lito
_1l1; utreeto \11!Ire not oat1et'aotory but oould be Otltietaotori1y adjustod. Alllo.
that tho portion of 'fhlrd Avenue,lying between the north 11DS .01' thlo treot ntlll
Leda LaDe and previously offered for dedio.tioa as a future Itreet. should be
improvod with this traot. Motion by Mr. Pratt, seooll4ed by Mr. Kl10pp and ou.
ried. that the firlnl map of Traot Ho. 20318 be reaOllllllllll4ed for llpp!"ovnl l1ubjeot
to the 1'olloring oOnditional
. :1-
9/28/54
.
.
I'
1. Tho:\; ai;Not gradeD be adjusted to 1:I1e saUot'QOt;1on of 1:I1e City
~inc9r.
2. ThQt; 1:I1e por'tion of Third AveDllO. offered for dediC/l.tion 0.8 future
stroot in 'l'rnot No. 17665. bo aooeptod by the C11:y for otreGt purposeo.
s. Thnt the above IIlOntionod portion of' t'ut;Ul"El otf'Elst be 1mpro.ved
along .-,ith too streot 1mpr~Dts 0.1' Tract Uo.. 20316.
Tho Commission oontlidered a reporl from the City Engineor rooOl!lm9ndil:lg the
o.l1oo8otiOl1 of coat 01' lnnd. 0.00006 and impro.vement 01' Traot No.. 198<17. loonted
an F11'th Avenue north 01' CamillO Real. 1'1hioh oho.uld be ohargeable to. lldjucent
propertiea nal: ontorinZ into. the subdivision. The report o.o.nto.incd detailed
onloulaticllO 0.0. to. tho oo.st to bc a1100ated to. three separate peroels oDd 0.100.
n draft 0.1' the prcpcsod do0.1araticn 0.1' trust to. be oreated. and rooOllllloDdod that
seid doolaration of trust be approved in farm by the City Attorney. Alfred
Allon. Subdivider. otatad that several 1t_8 01' expense. suoh lUl the eubdivioion
tiling 1'00. tho Oo.ot of a nGO olab for a go.rage required to. be mcved. nnd the
o.ost at roPo.u-ing the houso !'rOlil \7hioh the gll.r~o hBd ooen detaohed. had no.t boon
inoludod in the bf'eWalO1lll 0.1' o.ootll.
Tho CllllliIIiao.ion stated tho.t in their o.pini.cm the report uas Woll prepnred Ilnd
i:hat tho prino.iplo involved mlS c. step in the rl$ht dirClotlon to bring roUe!' to.
aroso to be oubd1vidod9 Mr. Hioldin etllted thntReco.lution no.. 2512. outhlli'1ning
this p7oceduroo roquirod that noticG be Given to property OlmGro propo.ced to. be
ahBrl);OO far 0. poniGlJ of thfl oo.at of the subdlvioion and lIllg/ltlllte4 that about ton
dnya' no.tioe tTo.ulc! ba desirable. Motion by Mr. Pratt. oooO!1dod by tlr. Ro.bortoou
and carried. that tho rapo.rt on the oo.st of ot:1l1o!le bonefito to bo dediO!l.ted to
tho public and the portion 01' ouoh Oo.sto to be Clppo1"tio!1sd to. nbutting property
be tentatively nppro.wd. ond that the BeoretaJoy be ingtruotad to. give m-itten
no.t100 to. o.i'feoted p7o.perty a:nwJ'1l that t~ Plllltllillg COIIllIliellion wUl ooudder
aDd mako determinntions rolative to eaid repo.rt at the next meeting o.f the Plane
nip:; COlllil\iellio.n to be h01d on Ootober 13. 19540 Gaid notio.e to advise intoreswd
ownerll that the report ls avaUable far inspeo.tion dUl"iug bu81neea hOUl"O ond
tho.t all o.bjeotions. suggestions and o.Ollllleute relative thereto lIlUot be preeented
'-n m-itil:lg prior to suoh meet1llg in o.rder to be oonsideredo
A Nlvieod tentative map of Treot No.. 18820. locaUld south of L01Igdon Avenue
and 68.st of Sixth Avenue, was oonBidered. '1'he revised map provided mare depth
ill the lo.to o.t tho south portio.n of the traot Ilnd MCI'/IOd 1\ ransonQblo co.y t?
subdivide adjllo.ont pro.perties 0 A repori: trom the Plaanillg Consul tnnt otated
that. if tho flood olllltorol e.ud drairmge problems _rCl aatisf'ao.to.ry to tho City
Ellginoel!' and the cmnor 0.1' tho parcel o.f pro.perty to. the So.uth had no. o.bjootion.
ho oo.~ Ilo. retlllen llhy tho tentat1vo map should not be t\pprovcd with thG uSWll
providon 01' dedicating a lot in fee to. the City at the south end of tho pro<>
posod strset to. o.outrol future ex1:ens1on. '1'1'10 Seo.retary reportod tnpt ho hod
oo.ntaotad Helll'y E. IIoCleskey, O1II1Or o.f' the property at 21120 South Sixth Avenuo.
o.ud thai: 14r. McCleskey had stated tlw.t he had no plana far wbdivlsion nt tho
present t1mo but thet he had llUlUf'1'ioient iDf'Oil'IllQtion on the proposed oubdivioiou
to. wnrrant him makil:lg any written statement. A repo.rt trrtill tho CUy Enginool"o
dllted September l~. 1mS reread. Mr. Ro.bertson stated thai: ,;Mile Boma of tho iota
nre lalls then the required 76 feet in width. he felt that the subdivider bo.d
prooanted a 1"eae01lllble plBII tar thiB partioulnr uea Gnd that tho lot Pidtho
ohOlnl mill'S in rOllsollable complianoo with the requiremonts. Motion by LIr.
Ro.bertson, aacondod by !Jr. Pratt and carried. that tho revieed toDtntivo map 01.'
Tract Ro.. 18820 be reoommended for approval o.e submitted subjoot to. the f'o.ll~
lJIg o.onditiollB1
10 Tho.t the area ino1uded 1n the traot and not within tho City of
Arcadia bo annoxcd to too City ."ithin II por1od o.f Dix months aDd
bo.fo.re nppro.vnl at the filial map.
20 Tho.t B two-too.t 10.10 be dedicated 111 tIKI to the City !lo.rooe tho
So.uth end ot the proposed atreet to oontrol fut\g'B extslls10l:l0
- 4: ...
9/28/64
. . . #
.
.
S. '!'hat the proposed ll=r lill9 be extended to provide servioe to
Lot 10.
<\. 'l:lult etort!l drain =tElr bEl drt\ined into Santa Anita TIallh by 0.
drt\1n approved by the City Engineer and the FloM Control Distrlot.
A ollll!lilUIliOtltion from tho City Clerk oteted that the City Counoil hod rOQ
quauWd the PlcnniJ!g Commis81ll11 to oll1leidor proper zoning to be applied to a
porti.on of oity>>Ot/UISd proparty 011 -the north aide of Live Oak A.WIlUO 0O.st of
Sixth Avenue. propol3sd to bo CllUlelted to th<l City of Arcadia. Ootio11 by tlr.
Pro:l:t. 51'1oo~<;ld by lli-. Robertoon and olU"ried, that tho City At'tornoy bo in-
atruotcd to prop3rG the n000800.ry rasolution to lnatitute prooeedingo tor the
propolled zoning.
!Jr. Victor G. Sidler. 341 FairviClP' Avenua. ollpr008od hie peroolCl
thanko end ilhOBO of hiB neighbors for the aotion talten by the COlElliasion in
reoQ1l\ll:Onding Zoae R-O tor portions of Fairv1t1l>' Avenue. Park AveDUo and Duarto
Road.
IIotioe of' "!;he azmual (IImfereiloo of' tho Loo.glW of Califonlie CitillO. to
be held in LCD ADgeloo on Ootober 17 to 200 una read. Tho C=1ooi011 requested
1;ho.t a oopy of the prcg:rem be funrtahed them Ull ooon ao a._Uabla.
The City At1:o:rney p1'eB0n'l:od Resolution ED. 169 ll'eoo=nding tho oho:ogo of
Ilono Treml ZOllO Rml ~o Zona RmO on oertAin proportho looated on li'o.1rviG<;1 Avonuo.
Park AvenUl'l and Duarte Rond. tlotion by ~. PJ"o.tt. ooo011dod by Mr. IDlbpp-tc.nd
ourriod. thnt t110 reading of tho body of the Rooolutlon bo mJ.1wd. llotion by
Mr. Pratt. aeoD:lldod by lli-. Knopp nnd oarried. thut Resolution No. 169 bo adopted.
the City Attorney prooentod ReDolutlO11 No. 110. reoomending tho denial
or tho requeat of Aroodia unified School Distriot for a BOXIe varionoe nft'ootiDg
oertain proporty 011 Duarte Resd. =ot of SllIIta Anita Avenue. Aftor oonoidorution.
tho City Attol'11oy =a instruoted to l!Inlm certain addltiol1O in 8oot1011 6 of the
Reooll!ti011. !1otion by Mr. KnopP. aeoanded by Mr. Robartaol1 and oarricd. thet
tho rending 01' tho body of tho Rooolution bo waived. !.lotiol1 by !.fr. KnopP.
Booollllllld by !1r. Rob3rtOon nnd oarried, that Rosolution liD. 170 tdth tho oug-
gest<Qd addition to 800'tion 6 be adop;;ed.
Tho City Attolr11Oy prollsnted RaoolutloIl 110. 171. reoollllllll11dill$ the g:ranti%l$
of tho appl illation of Anderson-RobbinlJ Company for a vnrilU10El to psl'lU1t "!;ho
property at 1\10 East Duar1;o Road to be used tor II real sstate o1'1'ioe. JIi1;er
oonll1derntion tho City Attorney vms roqueBted to odd 0 requirement of dedioation
tor mdening Duarte Road llIId to Brott the vari9.llOe to a. period 01' ono year.
Notion by Mr. llobertBon, aeool1dod by Mr. Pratt and oarried. that tho roe-ding 01'
tho& body of the RODolutioll be Dived. Motion by Hr. Robortooll. oooondod by LIr.
Pratt and oarried. that the Rellolution ll.S lllll8ndGd by e.dopted.
Thero being no further buoinooo. the mooti1lg udjou:rnodo
f~
L. n. TALLEY
Sooretary
m (; m
g/26/Si}