Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAUGUST 12, 1958 .~ ~-.... ROLL CALL MINUTES ZONING REPORTS (Live Oak Ave.) MINUTES '. PtANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 12, 1958 The Planning Collll8ission of the City of Arcadia met in rElgu1ar session in the COlDlcll Chamber of the City Hall at 8:00 o;clock P.M., August 12, 1958 PRESENT: Collllllf.ssioners Acker, Forman, Michler, Robertson' and Vachon A8SENT: Collll8issioners Davison and Stout O'tIIBRS PRESENT: ColDlcllman Reibold, Carozza, Cook, Nicklin, Gardner and Mrs. Andrews. Mtnutes of the meeting held July 8,1958 and July 22, 1958 were approved as written and mailed. Pursuant to notice given, a public hearing was held on the application of Robert F. Williams and Louise W. , Wordes, of 3953 E. Live Oak Avenue, Arcadia, for a zone change classification from Zone R-3 to Zone C-2 and Zone D on property located on Live Oak Avenue, described as Lots 32, 33, 53 and 54, Tract No. 13217. Ptoponents were asked to be heard. Robert S. Williams ot 2233 South 5th Avenue, Arcadia, representing himself and Mrs. Wordell, who was ill and could not attend. It was his understanding that the zoning was to be considered on a block to block basis and this was in line. It was also considered in the street plan that had been submitted by Everett Mansur, several years ago. The property has bElen IDldeveloped for 13 years. Under the present zoning it seems unadaptable for R-3uses. The' property has been otfered for sale at a reasonable price but has not been considered becauoe of the zoning. People have objected to noise, dust, etc. and the uncertainty of the future dQvelopment. Mr. John L. Blake, 417-419 E. Live Oak, was in favor of the zone change from R-3 to C-2, and D as requested. Opponents were ssked to be heard. No one appeared to concest the ma~tcr, but the Secretary read communications from Nathan McCray, 2529 South 3rd Avenue, and M. Dorothy Boor, 2535 South Third Avenue, protesting the zone change. The Staff Report was read, showing that this area was originally subdivided as residential property with lots facing 3rd Avenue and 4th Avenue. There are various deed restrictions which are matters for the applicants to consider. The Commission bas also indicated that any rezoning to commercial will be considered on a block by block basis. This application covers an entire block. If tbis property is zoned for commercial uses, the follow- ing items sbould be considered: 1. Dedicate 12 feet 'tor tbe widening of Third Avenue on tbe east side, and the west side of Fourth Ave- nue, and construct street improvements for the widened section. 2. Dedicate and improve an alley between Third Avenue and Fourth Avenue, at a location consis- tent with the parking plans previously tenta- tively approved. Page ]iIU Aug. I, 1958 HEAR'ING Stogsdill ,,/-,\ ',,-_/ 3. If a Zone D overlay is proposed. the following items in addition to those Bet out in the Zoning Ordinance should be considered~ (a) Commercial buildings to face Live Oak Avenue. (b) Businesses to be conducted within a building. (c) Public entrances to buildings from side streets to be limited. (d) Vehicular access by a dedicated alley only. (e) Exclusion of billboards. (f) Parking lot layout in compliance with an approved plan. including walls. landscaping and an adequate watering system. (g) Floodlighting directed away from other property. (h) Limit building height to one story. Mr. H. A. Mask. 2500 S. 4th Avenue, stated that he was a little closer to the property in queation. He WDuld like to suggest that people who bad moved into the area moved in with the idea that this property would be R-l and later it was zoned R-3. The property has laid idle. The property on tbe other side of Live Oak is in tbe same situation. It bas 1>2en mentioned that the property on the south side is C-2 in County territory, but be understood tbat just recently the Marshburn property between Farn Avenue and 6th Avenue. witbin the .last two weeks has been cleared of ail buildings andplantings, and it has been rumored tbat a large apartment house was going in. If County territory :I.s more desirable for apartments than the City of Arcadia. then someo~e is missing the boat. The bus route on Live Oak makes it ve:y'desirable for sn apartment house. He suggested that the Planning Commission defer a deci- sion until confirmation could be made as to whetber or not this property is to be used forR-3 purposes. The public hearing on the application of Robert F. Williams and Louise Wordes beld over until the next regular Zoning Committee Meeting for a report, and a decision of the Commission. Pursuant to notice given, a public bearing was held on the proposal to establish Zone D on property on the south side of Las Tunas Drive.. east of Baldwin Avenue as contemplated by Resolution No. 302. This application pertains to tbe Stogsdill C-2 and the proposed D over- lay at Las Tunas Drive and Baldwin Avenue. The Staff Report was read showing that the City Council has indic- ated its intention to grant a change of zone to Zone C-2 on certain real property on Las Tunas Drive Following is a list of items to be considered and comments on present requirements: 1. The beight, bulk and area of buildings. Zone C-2 allows 4 stories or 45 feet in hsight. Area is regulated only by lot size and parking requirements. 2. The setback distances from property lines. There are no existing setback requirements. The existing restaurant building is at the front property line. Across the street the existing commercial building is set back 10 feet. August 12. 1958 Pags two r VARIANCE (Seimer) '-_/ 3. The colore and materials on the exterior. Not now reguiated, except that C-2 zone is also No. I Fire D18tTict and the building code requires masonry construction of the building is on the property line. The type and pitch of roofs. Not now regulated except that it must be fire retardant. 4. 5. The size and spacing of windows, door and other openings. Not regulated except when within 20 feet of a side or rear lot line. 6. The size, tyPe and location of signs. Now Umited to 330 square feet maximum, 20 feet maximum above the roof and 50 feet max:\.18U18 above the curb. Bill- boards are an allowable use in Zone C-2. 7. Towers, Chimneys, roof structures, flagpoles, radio and television masts. The zoning ordinance allows these structures to be above the 45 foot height l1m1t. 8. Plot plan, landscaping and automobile parking area. Now required to provide one parking space for each 500 square feet of floor area in the building. 9. The relation to the existing buildings and struc- tures in the general vicinity and area. No regulations. Lighting of buildings, signs and groundS. No regulations except that signs within 100 feet of property in a residential zone shall not be flood- l1ghted between the hours of 10:00 P.M. and 6:00 A.M, Such lights shall not shine on residential property, and shall not ~ flashing or blinking, The Chairman. called. for proponents or opponents to this Zone D being established, and contemplated by Resolution No. 302. Mr. Ralph D. Stogsdill owner of this property, requested clarification, as to the setback. The Chair- man declared the hearing on proposal to establish ZOne D on property on Las Tunas Drive, east of Baldwin Avenue be held over until the next regular meeting for Zoning Committee report and a decision by the Commission. 10. Pursuant to notice given, a puhl:l.c hearing was held on the application of W. H, and F. G. Seimer for a variance to allow one additional dwelling on property located at 1208 South Sixth Avenue. The proposed plan 1a to put the house with the attached garage in front of the lot which 1s now vacant. The building site is the required 7500 square feet and the proposed house ia over the 1000 square. foot requirement. The setback would be in line with other properties. The spacing of the new house would be in line with the require- ments. At the time the Seimer's purchased the property the zone was R-l and a second dwelling could be built. The plans provide for 1097 square feet floor area; on August 21, 1957, the applicant applied for approval on the location to two additional houses, side by side on the front. This application, although protested by neighbors, was approved by the MOdification Committee on September II, 1957. This August 12, 1958 Page Three VARIANCE Jewish Center r- , ,,~ decision was appealed to the Comm:l.ssion and was approved by it on OCtober 22, 1957. The Commission's decision was appealed to the City Council and after a publiC hearing on November 19, 1957, the application was denied. However, on December 3, 1957, the decision was modified and permission given for one additional house on the front building line. The building was not constructed and the approval expired on June 3, 1958, at the end of the six month period. The east side of 6th Avenue, between the City boundary and P811181a Road have 31 lots of which 7 or 22.50'Z. have two or more dwell- ings. On the west side of the street from the boundary of the City to Camino Real there are 31 lots of which 13 or 41.90% have two or more dwellings. t~ithin 300 feet of said property on both sides of 6th Avenue there are 18 lots of Which 8 or 44.44% bave two or more dwellings. Tbe proponents were requested to speak. Mr. W. B. Selmer, stated tbat he did not live at 1208 Soutb 6tb Avenue, but at 498 Mesa Circle, Monrovia. He stated that he could not see any reason why tbe lot could not be developed. The matter bad been pending one way or another for over a year. He did not know tbat tbe tlme bad elapsed as be bsd not applied under a variance. Opponents were requested to speak. No one appeared against tbe variance. There was one cOlIBDUnication from Mary S. and Jack H. S mson, Jr. opposing the application, and a communi- cation from 19 people in tbe area, opposing tbe granting of a variance until sucb tlme as the cbickens and all non-con- forming buildings are removed from tbe property. !olr. Acker stated that the application was made for two houses on a lot prior to the adoption of Ordinance No. .990, and they had met all of tbe requirements and all of the COdES that were in existance at tbe time. Mr. Acker tben r.e1terated tbe history of the application and recommended that consideration be given to this request due to the many misunderstand1nss that have been made. !olr. Nicklin also summed up tbe case history of tbe Seimer application and added that all procedures under tbe Zoning Ordinance would lapse if not used within six months after tbe granting of those respective types of requests. Through either misinformation, lack of information or some cause, no action was taken after the Council I s action and six months went by. In order to clarify the situation, the Selmer's were advised to apply for a variance under Ordinance No. 990, and that. 1s before the Commission at the present time. :tt 1s largely a technicality that tbis is presented again. The Chairman declared the publiC hearing closed. Moved by Mr. Robertson, that the application of W. H. Selmer to allow the erection of an additional dwelling .at 1208 South 6th Avenue,be recommended for approval. Said motion was seconded by Mr. Acker. Roll call showed the following: AYES: Commissioners Acker, Forman, Michler, Robertson and Vachon. NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioners Davison and Stout. Pursuant to notice given, a public hearing was held on the application of Foothill Jewish Community Center for a variance to allow a temple, religious school, parking and R-3 uses at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Second Avenue. The application was read and maps presented sbowing the area under consideration. August 12, 1958 Page Four . The Staff Report was read showing that this property is presently zoned C-2, Pr 1 and R-l. It is requested to use the property for church and religious school, parking, multiple residence and single residence purposes. Sycamore Avenue, at this location is 50 feet wide. All new sub- divisions have been required to dedicate their share of additional land to make the street 60 feet wide. This property should dedicate the north 5 feet for street pur- poses. Also a 20 foot radius should be dedicated at the corner of Foothill Boulevard and Second Avenue. Concrete curb and gutter should be constructed along the entire frontage of the property along Second Avenue and Sycamore Avenue. It has been the practice of the city to install the pavement where the curb is installed by the property own~r; (The Zoning OLdinance requires that the parking lot be paveJ, and a masonry wall separating it from residential property. Consideration should be given to the requirement of an alley through this property to serve it and commercial property to the west. The alley should be at a location that will conveniently serve the commercial property. If a portion of the property is to be used for multiple residence purposes, it might be well for consideration of the feas1bil1ty of 1 Uniting the structures to one story as was done on Baldwin Avenue, north of Huntington &rive. The front 135 feet of this property facing Foothill Boulevard is now in Zone C-2 and No. 1 'Fire Zone, if it is to be used for temple and religious school purposes, with the usual yard separation from other property, the matter of exempting the building from the con- struction requirements of No. 1 Fire Zone should be considered, thus allowing more flexibility in designing an attractive building. If this is done the building code would still reqnire construction normal to other buildings outside the fire district. A petition was filed signed by forty property owners protest- ing the approval of the variance. The Chairman announced that this was the time and place for hearing the application for a variance to a temple and religious school, parking and R-3. Proponents were asked to be heard. Mr. Charles Lapson, 625 W. Foothill Blvd. stated that the report was satisfactory to them. When the land was acquired from the Oberly Estate, it was necessary to purchase the complete parcel. It was found that all of the land was not necessary. That putting the R-3 in between the parking area and the residential area on Sycamore, it would act as a buffer. The type of building to be erected to beautify the area would be of benefit to the entire community. He stated that there would be an auditorium that could have a seating capa- city of approximately 200; a social hall for entertainment but not for rental purposes. The opponents were asked to be heard. Mr. Herbert Blanchard, 136 E. Sycamore, objected to the Boning of the R-3. He felt the area was R~l and should remain that way. He did not oppose the rerction of the Church or the parking. Mr. R. A. Surlock, of 1201 Oak Glen Avenue, stated that his house was one block west of the area, and it was in a secluded res1dential area, and he delsred it to be kept that way. Mr_ Allen Hubbard, 1261 Oak Haven Lane, advised that he dfd not object to the church, but objected to the granting of an R-3 area. August 12, 1958 Page Five LOT SPLIT NO. 212 Goodrich Mr. Lewis Dar1s, of 1240 Oak Haven Lane stated that he objected to the R-3 and the parking area. If .the 1-3 were elim1nated, additional parking could be constructed, with sufficient depth .to the R-l lots and planting that wo.uld help. Mr. G. H. McFarland, 1260 Oak Haven Lene objected to the R-3 area.. Mr. Lapson stated that he wanted a friendly neighborhood and that he had suggested the R-3 as a buffer area, but that if the lots were made deeper on the R-l portion, and the parking area increased, there would be planting to make it beautiful insofar as the residents were concerned. Jack Zelkowitz, 302 West Foothill church was to use 96 by 140 feet. would be enlarged. Blvd. stated that the That the parking lot Dr. Kent Nebeker, 150 E. Sycamore, stated that the lots on Sycamore were 375 feet deep and that the a-3 and parking would come almost by the house next to it, as the set back is so deep. He felt that a change should be made. He was not opposed to the church, but felt that the residents in the area should be considered and better planning made. The Chairman del cared the hearing closed, Mr. Michler stated that it might be well to refer the matter to the Subdivision Committee and the 'Zoning Committee for a report. The matter was thereupon held over for a joint Zoning Committee and Subdivision Committee and Staff Report to be given at the next regular meeting,of the Planning Commission. No. 212 - Alma C. Goodrich, 2501 S. Second Avenue, referred to Mr. Stout and Mr. Acker. The request is to divide the lot which is 75 feet by 281.84 feet, witb a result of 150 feet on the west and 131.84 feet on the east. The newly created lot would conform in depth and area, and the reques t is recolIDDended for approval. Motion by Mr. Aclcer, second by Mr. Forman, artd carried that Lot Split No. 212, Alma C. Goodrich, 2501 S. Second Avenue be recommended for approval, subject to the following conditions: 1. Dedicate necessary easements for utilities at a location which will serve other lots. 2. Dedicate 12 feet for future widening of Second Avenue. ~ 3. File a final map with the City Engineer. 4. Pay $25.00 recreation fee. 5. City to dedicate north 75 feet of Lot 10, Tract 19707 ~B. 629, Pages 38-39 for street purposes. This is the one foot strip along Lee Avenue. 6. New lot DlUst have driveway constructed within the lot lines at time of building new house. August 12, 1958 Page Six LOT SPLrr No. 213 Strawn LOT SPLIT No. 214 Richards TRACT No. 21341 ,---- 7. New lot must also provide adequate parldng space for two cars, as outlined in Ordinance 967, Section 15, Paragraph 2; e.g. garage or roofed carport plus an additional parking space. No. 213 - Donald A. Strawn, 1133 S. First Avenue, referr- ed to Mr. Stout and Mr. Acker. This is a lot 381.94 feet deep. The request is to divide it into two parcels. Parcel 2 would face .on Louise Avenue and would conform to a reasonable subdivision plan. Motion by Mr. Acker, second by Michler, and carried that Lot Split No. 213, Donald A. Strawn, of 1133 S. First Avenue be recommended for approval, subject to the following conditions: 1. Remove building on Parcell to within 20 feet of rear line of Parcel 2. 2. File a final 1II8p with the City Engineer. 3. Pay $25.00 recreation fee. No. 214 - John Richards, 1020 Burnell Oaks Lane referr- ed to Mr. Davison and Mr. For1ll8n, The lot split is occasioned by the fact that the drip line of roof at 1020 Burnell Oaks is now on adjoining property. The split will provide legal yard and move ownership line to present fence line location. Mr. Robertson stated that there hsd been several of these lot splits wherein through an error in the location of the building on the lot, a lot split had become necessary so that the building would conform to yard requirements. He woul:d recommend that some steps be .takenwherein such an error could be corrected without coming before the Planning Commi- s.sion. It was determined that such a lot split could be considered as a modification, and the necessary steps should be taken to handle this through the MOdiflQation Committee. Motion by Forman, Second by Acker, that Lot Split'No. 214, John Richards of 1020 Burnell Oaks Lane, be approved, subject to the following condition: 1. Submit a final map to the City Engineer. Final lII8p of Tract No. 21341, located '.''3 Winnie Way ~lest of S!',nta Anita Avenue, consisting of 14 lots. This map conforms substantially with the approved tentative map and is now ready for approval. As a stipulation to the approval of the tentative map an attached garage at 64 W. Camino Real was to be re- moved. A letter on file from Mads Jorgensen, 64 W. Catuino Real requests that the garage be retained as a condition of the final map. The retnetion of the attached garage would place the dwelling within 2.5 feet of the newly created rear lot line. Motion by Mr. Robertson, seconded by Mr. Acker, and carried I that final map of Tract No. 21341 be recomDiended for approval subject to the 'following conditions: 1. Remove garage .at 64 W. Camino Real, north of Lot 13. August 12, 1958 Page Seven . TRACT NO. 21741 ... ,~ I.. 2. Remove a'Ll but.ldings within th~ tract. Move the garage on the parcel at 48 W. ~no 1l~a1. north of Lot 12, Remove the garage froiD. this: property at 85 W. 'Norman Avenue, south of Lot 9. Th~ staff hall investigated tha dwelling at 80 W~ Camino bai, n~rth of ,Lot 9, and fi~ds it to be only a single family dwelling, so that the breezeway 18 nol: required to be remOved~ " . 3. Deed the small parcel of property north Of the street, opposite Lot 1, to the owner of the pro- perty adjacent on the north. 4. Dedicate Lots 15, 16 and 17 to the. City in fee. 5. Install all street improvements required by the subdiv18ion ordf.naDce. 6. Pay all fees and deposits required by the subdivision ord1nance: Recreation Fee *Street Lights Street trees Street Signs 14 lots @ $25.00.....$350.00 5 @ $150.00......... 750.0Q 40 @ $5.00........... 200.00 2 @ $25.00.......... 50.00 * Estimated pending plan from Edison Co. '. 7. Provide'all necessary rear line easements for utilities. 8. The City shall accept for street purposes the portion of Lots 6 and 15, Tract No. 16741, shown as future street, at the present dead end of Winnie Way. Finsl map of Tract No. 21741, located on Louise Avenue, north of Callitno Real, consisting of 9 lots. Th1s f1nal map confortDs substantially with the approved tentative map and 18 now ready for finsl approval. Moved by Mr. Robertson, seconded by Mr. Acker, and carded, that final map of Tract No. 2'1741, located on L uise Avenue, north of Camino Real, cons1sting of 9 lots, be rec:ommended for approval, subject to the following conditions: 1. .Deed Lots 10, 11 end 12 in fee to the City. 2. Dedicate 5 foot planting and s1dewalk easements along each side of each street. 3. Install all street improvements required by the subdivision ordidance. 4. Pay all fees and deposits required by the sub- division ordinance. Recreation Fee *Street Lights Street trees Street Signs 9 @ $25.00...........$225.00 2 @ $150.00.......... 300.00 16 @ $5.00..-.......... 80.00 1 @ $25.00........... 25.00 * Estimated, pending plan from Ed180n Co. 5. Remove all buildings within the tract. 6. Provide all necessary rear line easements for Utilities. August 12, 1958 Page Eight . TRACT NO. 24548 ,r-.\ 7! The City sh~i dedicate Lot 12, Tract No~ 24350 for street purpi)Ses. 8. The subdivider shall pay the trust established (!n portion of Lot 13, Tract No. 24350, and the City shall dedicate it for street purposes. Tentative map of Tract No. 24548, located on Loganrita Avenue, north of Altern Street, consisting of 22 lotsi The portion shown on Lot "1" was denied a lot. split on February 11, 1958, as number 194, at a depth of 112 feet. It was recOllllll8llded at that time that the depth be made apprOximately 132 feet. If this is re-submltted with an acceptable depth, it should be included in the final map of this tract. The matter of the concrete slab near the rear was discussed. Hr. Batllll81l stated that the owner desired to retain the slab as is. Hr. Robertson questioned the retention of the slab as it could create yard requirement problems at a later dete. Moved by Mr. Robertson, seconded by Hr. Acker, and carried that tentative Tract No. 24548, located on Loganrita Avenue, north of Altern 7Street, consisting of 22 lots be recommended for approval, subject to the following conditions: 1. Eltminate the 12 foot strip of future street south .of Altern Street .from the Tract. 2. Add the area north of Altern Street and east of Loganrita Avenue to the Tract, give it a lot number and deed it to the owner of Lot 5, Tract No. 13439. 3. Deed Lot 24 to the City in fee tel control future extension. 4. The City should accept the future street at the end of Altern Street, and abandon the unused portion of future street along Lot 5, Tract No. 13439. s. Remove all buildings within the Tract except the houses on Lots 7, 16 and 17. Remove all buildings acrelssthe tract line. 6. Provide all necessary rear line easements for utilities. 7. Install all street improvements required by the subdivision ordinance. 8. Pay all fees and deposits required by the sub- division ordinance. 9. Remove concrete slab from lot directly west of proposed Lot No. 6 so that a required 3 foot rear yard will be provided. ~ ZCNE VAIlIANCE (Cain & Meade) 10. Remove guest 'hoUse from lot 16 prior to building on it. 11. Straighten rear line of Lot 6 by taking out 6 foot jO~.cA' The app11cal:ions of Philip C. Cain, 1320 S. Second Avenue and Giles G. Meade, 1234 S.Second Avenue, referred back by the City CoUDcil. The plot plans have now been sub- mitted by the two applicants, .showing the elevations of the proposed dwellings. The applicsntsbave shown their August 12, 1958 Page Nina CAR WASH RESOLUTION NO. 303 RESOLUTION NO. 304 willingness to comply to the terms of the ordinance. Dis- cusslon followed as to the yard requirements, etc. Mr. Robertson asked on what techn1cality is this application belng referred back from the City Council. Mr. NickUn stated that the reason was 1n the odg1nal appl:lcat1on each appUcant asked for an extended pedod of time :In which to comply with the vadance, one for ten years, and the other no specified time; there were no plot plans submitted. The Council felt that each of, the parties hac! indicated their willingness before the City Council to accept the normal vadance with the elx months pedod in which to comply with the terma thereof, that the record before the Plann1ng Commission should show the same items, such as plot plan. and elevations, and the desire to comply to the terma~ The Planning Commission should have an opportunity .to review the matter to see if it would have an effect on the:lr prior recom- mendation which was a den:lal of the requested var:lance~ If the dec1sion ware to reaffirm tbe pdor action, which was a denial of the two cases, then a statement tb that effect 1n the minutes would refer it back to the Council without further action. If it would vary the decision, tben it could be handled one of two ways; either by report1ng to tbe Council that these are material ltems which were lack1ng atthe time of the decision, and based on those the decision might be different; technically, to be correct, if the decision 18 ult:l.mately to permit the building of the dwelling, it would be to amend the Resolution, and re-notice the hearing. If the indication is that these matters were not deemed matedal at the time, and would not I:!e so con- sldered now, then there would be no point in sett1ng up a new bearing. Moved by Mr. Michler, seconded by Mr. Forman, and carded that the matter be referred back to the Zoning Committee for report in view of the new evidence presented. Mr. Dudley J. Lang, 510 S. Elwood Avenue, Glendora, presented a letter to discuss the matter of a car wash at 1414 South Baldwin Avenue. Mr. Lang stated that he was desiroua of purchasing the property at this address, but wanted to impr<;ye the facilities. They wanted to compete with other businesses of like nature. He wanted to know just what. could be done under the present regulations, or what the procedure would be. It was determined that Mr. Lang sbould apply for a variance for the particular type of operation. No. 303 The City Attorney presented R solution No. 303, e entitled, "A Resolution of the City Planning CommiSSion of the City of Arcadia, California, recommending the grant- ing of a variance to permit three additional dwell1ngs on certa1n real property in said City.. Motion by Mr. Acker, seconded by Mr. Forman, and carried that the reading of the fuli body of the Resolution be waived. Moved by Mr. Forman, seconded by Mr. Acker, and carried that Resolution No. 303 be adopted. No. 304 - The City Attorney presented Resolut1on No. 304 entitled, "A Resolution of the City .Planning CoDlD1ssion of tbe City of Arcadta, California, recommending the estab- lis~t of Zone D on certa1n property on Louise and La Roy Avenues". Motion Mr. Robertson, seconded by Mr. Michler, and carried that the reading of the full body of the Resolution be waived. August 12, 1958 Page Ten . . . .r Moved by Mr~ Michler. se~onded by *,. Robertson, and cur1ed that Resolution No~ 304 be adopted. RESOLUTION No~ ,305 - Th~ City Attorney presenteiiResoiution No, 'NO. 305 305; entitled., "A Resolution of the City Planning CoimD- ission of the Oity of Arcadia. California. declaring its intentlo~ t~ institute proceedings for .the consid- eration of and nlaking recollllll8ndations concerning the' reclassification from c-o and D to Zone R-3 of certain real property in proposed Tract No. 24499 in said City." Motion by Mr. Robertson. seconded by Mr. Acker. and , carried that the reading of the full body of the Resolution be waived. Moved by Mr. Acker. seconded by Mr. Robertson; imd carded that Resolution No. 305 be adopted. ELECTION OF OFFICERS The Secretuy declared it was the time for election of officers. At this time the Chairman steted that although a full COlDIDission was not present the balloting would proceed. Ballots were distributed whereon Mr. Harold A. Acker was chosen unanimously as Chairman for the ensuing yeu. It was the desire of the COlDIDission that Mr. H. T. Michler be unanimously elected as Vice- Chairmsn. PLANNING CONGRESS The Secretery announced that the next meeting of the Planning Congress would be held st Redondo Beach, on thursday. August 14. 1958. and requested information as to those who could attend. Previous cOlDIDitments prevented any representation at this meeting. ADJOURN: There being no further business to come before the CODBDf.sslon. the meeting adjourned. J-i/-J~./) /!;'zz.fdv.J..-..- ~E G. GARDNER Planning Technician August 12. 1958 Page Eleven