Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAUGUST 26, 1958 w r- ROLL CALL MINUTES ZONING REPORTS (Live Oak Ave.) MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 26, 1958 The Planning Commission of the City of Arcadia met in regular session in the Council Chamber of the City Hall at 8:00 P.M.. August 26, 1958 PRESENT: Cotml1issioners Acker, Davison, Michler, Robertson, Stout and Vachon ABSBNT: Commissioner Forman OTHERS PRESENT: Carozza, Gardner, Nicklin, Andrews and new Director of Public Works, Charles B. Lortz Minutes of the meeting of August 12 were amended by adding the follow- ing paragraph '~n amendment of Section 20 of the Subdivision Ordinance pertaining to the length of cul de sac streets was presented by the City Attorney in draft form. Motion by Mr. Michler, seconded by Mr. Robertson and carried that the revision of the Subdivision Ordinance, Section 20, which limits the length of cul de sacs, be submitted to the City Council with recommend- ation for adoption." Motion by Mr. Michler, seconded by Mr. Robertson and carried that the minutes of August 12 be approved as amended. Consideration was given the application of Robert F. Williams and Louise W. Wordes for change of classification from Zone R-3 to Zone C-2 on property located north side of Live Oak Avenue between Third and F~urth Avenues. Report from Zoning Committee to Planning COtml1i- ssion was read. The Zoning Cotml1ittee recommended approval of the application, subject to the following condi'i:ions, and changes: FOR THE CHANGE 1. C-2 Zone to extend 70 feet north of Live Oak Avenue property line on Live Oak Avenue between Third and Fourth Avenues. 2. Remainder of Lots 32 and 54, Tract No. 13217, plus Lots 33 and 53 of said tract to be placed in Zone PR-3. 3. Dedicate and improve a 20 foot strip for alley purposes in PR-3 Zone. Alley location should conform to pattern as established by engineering drawings on file. 4. Dedicate 12 feet for widening the east side of Third Avenue and the west side of Fourth Avenue, and construct the street improve- ments for the widened section. The Committee also recommended approval of the D Overlay, subject to the following conditions: 1. All commercial buildings to face Live Oak Avenue. 2. All businesses to be conducted within a building. 3. Public entrances to building from side streets to be limited. 4. Vehicular access by a dedicated alley only. 5. Exclusion of billboards. Page One August 26, 1958 DECISION (ZONE D STOGSDILL) VARIANCE (Jewish Center) '--__J 6. Parking lot layout in compliance with an approved plan, including walls, landscaping and an adequate watering system. 7. Floodlighting directed away from other property. 8. Limit building height to one story. At this time Mrs. Mask, 2500 S. Fourth Avenue requested to be heard. Although the hearing was closed, it was suggested by Mr. Robertson that the procedure be waived and grant Mrs. Mask an opportunity to speak. The request was granted by the Chairman. Mrs. Mask then asked for clarification on .the application, and protested the zone change. Motion by Mr. Michler and seconded by Mr. Vachon, and unanimously carried that the City Attorney be instructed to prepare the necessary resolution to .recommend the approval of the application for change of zone from Zone R-3 to Zones C-2 and D on the north side of Live Oak Avenue between Third and Fourth Avenues, as outlined in the Zoning Committee Recommendation. Consideration was given the proposed Zone D Overlay on Las Tunas Drive, east of Baldwin Avenue. The Zoning Committee report was read, recommending approval of D Overlay, subject to the following conditions: 1. Limit building heights to one story. 2. Any exterior sign displayed shall pertain only to a use conducted within the building; shall be attached to and be parallel with and not more than 6 inches from the wall of the main building or from the front of a marquee fronting the principal street, a parking area 1n the rear, or 1n the case of a corner building, on that portion of the side street wall within 50 feet of the principal street. In no case shall a sign project above the roof line. 3. All floodlighting shall be directed away from the adjoining pro- perty, and a solid masonry wall 6 feet in height shall be constructed around C-2 Zone where it abuts residential property,except that it shall be 4 feet in height frOlll the building set-back Une to the street property line. 4. Although D Overlay zone does not regulate types of uses as such on property, it is recommended that certain uses be eliminated frOlll Zone C-2 on subject property. The recommendation would exclude those uses specified in subsection 3, 4, 7, 8, 14, 16, 17, 19, 20, 22, 29, 30, 35, 36, 37, 38 and 41. Part A Section 9, Ord1nance No. 760, as amended by Ordinance 900. Mr. Acker asked: '~ince a variance was granted the restaurant for the root sign, Should consideration be given the section prohibit- ing roof signs7" Mr. Vachon stated that inasmuch as the existing sign is operating under a variance, it is not affected by the D Overlay, and future" signs will have separate considerations. Motion by Mr. Michler, seconded by Mr. Vachon and unanimously carried that the City Attorney be instructed to prepare the nece- ssary Resolution to recommend the establishment of Zone D on property on the south side of Las Tunas Drive, east of Baldwin Avenue, as contemplated by Resolution No. 302, as outlined above. This matter was held over from the meeting of August 12, 1958 for decision. It was the recommendation of the Zoning and Subdivi- sion Committees that the variance be granted subject to the follow- ing conditions: Page Two August 26, 1958 PUBLIC HEARING (H.R. Riggins) I') '---../ 7'-- 1. School and temple use be limited to a depth of 190 feet from Foot- hill Boulevard property linej applicants to dedicate the north 20 feet of the south 210 feet of Lot 5 for alley purposes; parking area should be limited to the south 200 feet of the north 375 feet of Lot 5; the north 175 feet to remain in R-l use. 2. Provide, plant and maintain a five foot plant~ng strip along the east property line adjacent to the parking lot. Planting should be shrubbery type to ~ct as a buffer from the street. 3. Six (6) foot solid masonry walls should be constructed along the line between the R-l parcel and the park~ng lot; also, along the west side of parking lot. A planting strip is recommended along this wall. 4. If parking is to be utilized at night, all lighting is to be so installed as to be directed away. from all residential areas. 5. The front 135 ft of this property facing Foothill is now in Zone C-2 and in No. 1 Fire District. If it is to be used for temple and religious school purposes with the usual yard separations from other properties, the matter of exempting the building from construction requirements of No. 1 Fire District may be considered, thus allowing more flexibility in design. . If this is done, the building code would still require construction normal to other buildings outside the Fire District. It is recommended that the temple and school build- ings be relieved of No. 1 Fire Zone requirements. It was stated by the applicant, Mr. Lapson, that the temple would need more depth from Foothill Blvd. The alley is very necessary. That do not believe they will need 200 ft of parking. If they could shorten the R-l lots., and cooperate with one of the adjacent property owners who indicated that he was desirous of installing a new street to sub- divide a portion of his property and a portion of the church property. They .suggest shortening the lot from Sycamore to 145 ft at the most, putt- ing more on to the front for the church building site; that once they have an alley through, they would be hampered as to building site. An inquiry was made Mr. 'Nicklin stated: 40 days after close recommendation. No it is continued. as to how long the variance could be kept open. A variance application must be decided within of hearing. If not, it goes to Council without limit to time hearing can be kept open as long as Motion was made and carried unanimously to continue the hearing on the Zone Variance for the Jewish. Center, and referred to the Subdivi- sion and Zoning Committees for further study. The Chairman stated that this was the time and place for public hear- ing on the application of H. R. Riggins for a variance to allow the retention of kitchen facilities in the guest house at 85 W. Lemon Avenue. Proponents were asked to be heard. Harold Riggins of 85 W. Lemon, representing himself, attempted to claJ:'ify his position: (a) Granting of variance would not change a-l restrictions as to renting. to two families. (b) It does not change the R-l regulations as to more than one. family occupying the lot. (c) It does not constitute in any way a wedge that would be used in the future that would have any affect if zoning change were applied for. (d) If he is wrong in the above statements, he will withdraw the application for variance. The Chairman explained that a variance is given to the property, not to an individual. Page Three August 26, 1958 ZONING E. A. PARK r- , , Mr. Nicklin stated that it might be possible to so word the varisnce as to practically restrict any other sub-leasing of the property. Technically, however, the variance is granted because of conditions affecting the property, not solely because of conditions personal to the present owner or tenant. Mr. Riggins inquired if the variance could be granted with the stip- ulation that it could not be rented. He intends to continue occupy- ing the property as a single family use. The guest house is attached to the garage, and is 16 feet from the dwelling. They did not know this was in violation until they applied for permit to build an attached portion to make this one unit. There were 5 signatures on application favoring the variance as follows: (1) H. R. Hart 80 W. Lemon Avenue (2) E. P. Ziegler 105 W. Lemon Avenue (3) William Steinbrenner 100 W. Lemon Avenue (4) Walter James 81 W. Lemon Avenue (5) Henry C. Hand 84 W. Lemon Avenue No one appeared to contest the matter, but the Secretary read communi- cations from three property owners residing at 110 W. Norman Avenue, 100 W. Norman Avenue and 86'W. Norman Avenue, and from W. R. James, 81 W. Lemon Avenue protesting the variance. Motion by Mr. Vachon, seconded by Mr. Michler and carried that the hearing be continued for staff report, consultation with the Attorney and Zoning Committee report. Pursuant to notice given, a public hearing was held on the application of Park Investment Company .for variance to allow a parking lot on R-l property located at .1150 W. Foothill Boulevard at the southeast corner of Michillinda Avenue. A letter from the applicant, E. A. Park, was read which stated there would be no permanent buildings, only minor ground improvements, and outlined the parking needs. A letter of protest from H. C. Sommer was read. The staff report stated that the lot currently is zoned R-l, but County territory across Michillinda Avenue is zoned commercially along Foothill Boulevard with residential zone to the rear. Sears, Pasadena is being completed on the northwest corner. Contemplated use of the property is a parking lot for Sears' employees only for an estimated 343 cars. Access would be from Michillinda Avenue only; no exits on Foothill Boule- vard. Proponects were asked to be heard. Mrs. Elaine Park stated that this property was presently unsightly and undesirable for residential build- ings, and that freeway plans make it completely unsaleable for single residence. Mr. Stuart Hamblin stated that he owns 10 acres adjacent to this area, and that he had not been contacted with regard to the petition; further that he was in favor of granting the variance for the stated purpose. Opponents wers asked to be heard. Mrs. Jack Rosenburg, 1139 W. Foot- hill Boulevard presented a petition against the variance, signed by 27 property owners, stating that the variance would deteriorate value of properties on both sides of Foothill Boulevard with greatest damage done to those homes on the south side, which probably are the most Page Four August 26, 1958 LOT SPLIT NO. 215 J. R. Hector LOT SPLIT NO. 216 Hubbert I ',--~ expensive in Arcadia. Such variance would make possible other requests of like nature. The variance would be in violation of Restriction No. 3 of the original Baldwin Deed, which is binding until December 31, 1975. Mr. John King, who resides on Arbolada Drive, just west of the proposed parking lot, stated that signals at that corner are not presently regul- ated for such crossing of traffic. Approximately 200 children in the neighborhood would need signal protection from the traffic involved, and he felt this would not be possible. Mrs Effie Lemar, 3865 Sierr!, Grande, Pasadena, reaffirmed the state- ment of Mr. King. Mr. Harry Vawter, 881 W. Foothill Boulevard stated that he represented 165 of the 193 residents in this immediate vicinity, and was opposed to the parking lot for two reason: (1) The breaking down of R-l zoning will open the way for many other applications. (2) The parking lot is not going to help their property in any way. In a short time there would be a request for a building to house the attendant, then a gas station. He pointed out that recent residential development which would indicate to him that the property in question could be developed otherwise. Mr, Vawter recalled incidents in the past years when the City of Arcadia aided the residents in keeping the R-l zoning in this area. Mr. Howard Garrison, 970 W. Foothill Boulevard, in the same strip of pro- perty as that in question, stated that he has over $100,000.00 invested in his home, and along with every home owner in the immediate vicinity would do everything possible to keep the property from being developed for any commercial use, The hearing was declared continued for reports and a decision at the next meeting. No. 215. Mr. Julius Hecktor, 1054 S. 10th Avenue, referred to Mr. Stout and Mr. Michler. The request is to divide the north half of the lot into two parcels of 57 foot frontages on 10th Avenue. If this split is granted a driveway should be provided to the carports on Parcel No.1; also, the carport and guest house operation on the rear of this property is questionable as to building standards. A condition of the split might be the removal of the above. Motion by Mr. Michler, seconded by Mr. Stout and carried that applica- tion for Lot Split No. 215 be approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Submit a final map to the Ci~ Engineer. 2. Install a sewer lateral for parcel No.2. 3. Pay $25.00 recreation fee. 4. Remove guest house with attached carports from Parcel No. 1 Donald B. Hubbert, 1653 Perkins Drive, referred to Mr. Vachon and Mr. Davison. The request for division is to provide an area for a swimming pool for prospective purchaaer. Seller and purchaser will execute coven- ant that no living quarters will be erected thereon. Division and subsequent sale would tie the rear portion of Lots 53 and 54 to Lot 57, which could create definite sewage problems for the owner of Lot 57. Motion by Mr. Vachon, seconded by Davison and carried that the request be recommended for approval, subject to the following conditions: Page Five August 26, 1958 .. .' ... RESOLUTION NO. 306 RESOLUTION NO. 307 ,~--, , '--- ~ 1. Shift proposed division line 2 feet to the west in order to keep guest house conforming with a 25 foot rear yard. 2, Require covenant to guarantee no living quarters on Parcel No.2. 3. Dedicate 5 feet off of Lot 57 for street widening purposes. 4. File final map with City Engineer. 5. Pay $25.00 recreation fee. 6. Remove storage shed from rear of Lot 54. No. 306 - The City Attorney presented Resolution No. 306, entitled, "A Resolution of the City Planning Commission of the City of Arcadia, Calif- ornia, recommending the granting of a zone variance to permit the construc- tion of an additional dwelling at 1208 S. Sixth Avenue." W. H. and F. G. Seimer, owners, have applied for variance to construct an additional dwelling on the front portion of the south 92.5 feet of the north 185 feet of Lot 62, Tract No. 808. Moved by Mr. Michler, seconded by Mr. Stout and carried, to waive the reading of the full body of Resolution No. 306. Moved by Mr. Vachon, seconded by Mr, Davison and carried that Resolution No. 306 be adopted, No. 307 - The City Attorney presented Resolution No. 307 entitled, "A Resolution of the City Planning Commission of the City of Arcadia, Calif- ornia memorializing the services of Michael J. Carozza." The Resolution reads as follows,: RESOLUTION NO. 307 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, MEMORIALIZING THE SERVICES OF MICHAEL J. CAROZZA. WHEREAS, Michael J. Carozza was first employed by the City of Arcadia on September 6, 1955, and since that time has continuously served the City of Arcadia as Director of Public Works., City Engineer and Street Superintendent; and, WHEREAS, Michael J. Carozza has worked consistently and dili- gently with the City Planning Commission of the City of Arcadia in solv- ing the many problems presented to this Commission by a rapidly growing community; and WHEREAS, Michael J. Carozza, affectionately known as "Mike" to all his friends, has exhibited not only the skill and training required of a registered civil engineer, but in addition has demonstrated a buoyancy of spirit, an untiring perseverance, a far-sighted approach and a limitless congeniality with those with whom he came in contact, whether employer, fellow employee or members of the general public, as a result, of which the community of Arcadia has made progress and improvement in its planning, public works construction, beautification program,street betterments and traffic control; and, WHEREAS, Michael J. Carozza has indicated his intention to ter- minate his services with the City of Arcadia and to move from the commun- ity on September 1, 1958; Page Six August 26, 1958 . , , - ORDINANCE NO. 990 HUNTINGTON BLVD. SETBACK NOW, THEREFORE. the City Planning Commission of the City of Arcadia. California, does hereby extend to Michael J. Carozza the apprec- iation of its members for his invaluable assistance and encouragement in the performance of this Commission's work. and the best wishes of each member hereof for success and happiness in. his new position. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and shall cause a suitable copy hereof to be presented to Michael J. Carozza. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution Was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Planning Commission held on the 26th day of August, 1958. by the following vote: AYES: Harold L. Acker Chairman Frank E. Vachon Commissioner R. E. Davison Commissioner D. L. Robertson Commissioner Ed. F. Stout COJlllDissioner H. T. Michler COJlllDissioner ABSENT BUT CONCURRING: George Forman Connniss ioner James A.Nicklin City Attorney Neil F. .Anderson City Manager L. M. Tulley Planning Secretary Moved by Mr. Robertson, seconded by Mr. Vachon and carried unanimously that Resolution No. 307 be adopted. Mr. Carozza introduced Mr. Charles E. Lortz. the incoming Director of Public Works. A copy of a letter to the Mayor and City Council regarding Ordinance No. 990. suggesting a joint meeting of the City Council with the Planning Commission to formulate criteria,or a policy for handling future appli- cations for building of second dwellings in R-l areas were read. A meeting has been set tentatively for sometime in October for this joint meeting. A letter received too late for agenda will be placed on next agenda reques ting a change of setback line from 50 feet to 35 feet on the south side of Huntington Blvd., west of Baldwin Avenue to west City limits. There being no further business, the meeting adjourned. 'Jf ':":" ~ Planning Secretary Page Seven August 26, 1958