HomeMy WebLinkAboutAUGUST 26, 1958
w r-
ROLL CALL
MINUTES
ZONING
REPORTS
(Live Oak
Ave.)
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA
REGULAR MEETING
AUGUST 26, 1958
The Planning Commission of the City of Arcadia met in regular session
in the Council Chamber of the City Hall at 8:00 P.M.. August 26, 1958
PRESENT: Cotml1issioners Acker, Davison, Michler, Robertson, Stout and
Vachon
ABSBNT:
Commissioner Forman
OTHERS PRESENT: Carozza, Gardner, Nicklin, Andrews and new Director
of Public Works, Charles B. Lortz
Minutes of the meeting of August 12 were amended by adding the follow-
ing paragraph '~n amendment of Section 20 of the Subdivision Ordinance
pertaining to the length of cul de sac streets was presented by the
City Attorney in draft form.
Motion by Mr. Michler, seconded by Mr. Robertson and carried that the
revision of the Subdivision Ordinance, Section 20, which limits the
length of cul de sacs, be submitted to the City Council with recommend-
ation for adoption."
Motion by Mr. Michler, seconded by Mr. Robertson and carried that the
minutes of August 12 be approved as amended.
Consideration was given the application of Robert F. Williams and
Louise W. Wordes for change of classification from Zone R-3 to Zone
C-2 on property located north side of Live Oak Avenue between Third
and F~urth Avenues. Report from Zoning Committee to Planning COtml1i-
ssion was read. The Zoning Cotml1ittee recommended approval of the
application, subject to the following condi'i:ions, and changes:
FOR THE CHANGE
1. C-2 Zone to extend 70 feet north of Live Oak Avenue property
line on Live Oak Avenue between Third and Fourth Avenues.
2. Remainder of Lots 32 and 54, Tract No. 13217, plus Lots 33 and
53 of said tract to be placed in Zone PR-3.
3. Dedicate and improve a 20 foot strip for alley purposes in PR-3
Zone. Alley location should conform to pattern as established
by engineering drawings on file.
4. Dedicate 12 feet for widening the east side of Third Avenue and
the west side of Fourth Avenue, and construct the street improve-
ments for the widened section.
The Committee also recommended approval of the D Overlay, subject to
the following conditions:
1. All commercial buildings to face Live Oak Avenue.
2. All businesses to be conducted within a building.
3. Public entrances to building from side streets to be limited.
4. Vehicular access by a dedicated alley only.
5. Exclusion of billboards.
Page One
August 26, 1958
DECISION
(ZONE D
STOGSDILL)
VARIANCE
(Jewish
Center)
'--__J
6. Parking lot layout in compliance with an approved plan, including
walls, landscaping and an adequate watering system.
7. Floodlighting directed away from other property.
8. Limit building height to one story.
At this time Mrs. Mask, 2500 S. Fourth Avenue requested to be heard.
Although the hearing was closed, it was suggested by Mr. Robertson that
the procedure be waived and grant Mrs. Mask an opportunity to speak. The
request was granted by the Chairman.
Mrs. Mask then asked for clarification on .the application, and protested
the zone change.
Motion by Mr. Michler and seconded by Mr. Vachon, and unanimously carried
that the City Attorney be instructed to prepare the necessary resolution
to .recommend the approval of the application for change of zone from Zone
R-3 to Zones C-2 and D on the north side of Live Oak Avenue between Third
and Fourth Avenues, as outlined in the Zoning Committee Recommendation.
Consideration was given the proposed Zone D Overlay on Las Tunas Drive,
east of Baldwin Avenue.
The Zoning Committee report was read, recommending approval of D Overlay,
subject to the following conditions:
1. Limit building heights to one story.
2. Any exterior sign displayed shall pertain only to a use conducted
within the building; shall be attached to and be parallel with and
not more than 6 inches from the wall of the main building or from the
front of a marquee fronting the principal street, a parking area
1n the rear, or 1n the case of a corner building, on that portion
of the side street wall within 50 feet of the principal street. In
no case shall a sign project above the roof line.
3. All floodlighting shall be directed away from the adjoining pro-
perty, and a solid masonry wall 6 feet in height shall be constructed
around C-2 Zone where it abuts residential property,except that
it shall be 4 feet in height frOlll the building set-back Une to
the street property line.
4. Although D Overlay zone does not regulate types of uses as such
on property, it is recommended that certain uses be eliminated
frOlll Zone C-2 on subject property. The recommendation would exclude
those uses specified in subsection 3, 4, 7, 8, 14, 16, 17, 19, 20,
22, 29, 30, 35, 36, 37, 38 and 41. Part A Section 9, Ord1nance No.
760, as amended by Ordinance 900.
Mr. Acker asked: '~ince a variance was granted the restaurant for
the root sign, Should consideration be given the section prohibit-
ing roof signs7"
Mr. Vachon stated that inasmuch as the existing sign is operating
under a variance, it is not affected by the D Overlay, and future"
signs will have separate considerations.
Motion by Mr. Michler, seconded by Mr. Vachon and unanimously
carried that the City Attorney be instructed to prepare the nece-
ssary Resolution to recommend the establishment of Zone D on
property on the south side of Las Tunas Drive, east of Baldwin
Avenue, as contemplated by Resolution No. 302, as outlined above.
This matter was held over from the meeting of August 12, 1958 for
decision. It was the recommendation of the Zoning and Subdivi-
sion Committees that the variance be granted subject to the follow-
ing conditions:
Page Two
August 26, 1958
PUBLIC
HEARING
(H.R. Riggins)
I')
'---../
7'--
1. School and temple use be limited to a depth of 190 feet from Foot-
hill Boulevard property linej applicants to dedicate the north 20
feet of the south 210 feet of Lot 5 for alley purposes; parking
area should be limited to the south 200 feet of the north 375 feet
of Lot 5; the north 175 feet to remain in R-l use.
2. Provide, plant and maintain a five foot plant~ng strip along the
east property line adjacent to the parking lot. Planting should
be shrubbery type to ~ct as a buffer from the street.
3. Six (6) foot solid masonry walls should be constructed along the
line between the R-l parcel and the park~ng lot; also, along the
west side of parking lot. A planting strip is recommended along
this wall.
4. If parking is to be utilized at night, all lighting is to be so
installed as to be directed away. from all residential areas.
5. The front 135 ft of this property facing Foothill is now in Zone C-2
and in No. 1 Fire District. If it is to be used for temple and
religious school purposes with the usual yard separations from other
properties, the matter of exempting the building from construction
requirements of No. 1 Fire District may be considered, thus allowing
more flexibility in design. . If this is done, the building code would
still require construction normal to other buildings outside the
Fire District. It is recommended that the temple and school build-
ings be relieved of No. 1 Fire Zone requirements.
It was stated by the applicant, Mr. Lapson, that the temple would
need more depth from Foothill Blvd. The alley is very necessary. That
do not believe they will need 200 ft of parking. If they could shorten
the R-l lots., and cooperate with one of the adjacent property owners
who indicated that he was desirous of installing a new street to sub-
divide a portion of his property and a portion of the church property.
They .suggest shortening the lot from Sycamore to 145 ft at the most, putt-
ing more on to the front for the church building site; that once they
have an alley through, they would be hampered as to building site.
An inquiry was made
Mr. 'Nicklin stated:
40 days after close
recommendation. No
it is continued.
as to how long the variance could be kept open.
A variance application must be decided within
of hearing. If not, it goes to Council without
limit to time hearing can be kept open as long as
Motion was made and carried unanimously to continue the hearing on
the Zone Variance for the Jewish. Center, and referred to the Subdivi-
sion and Zoning Committees for further study.
The Chairman stated that this was the time and place for public hear-
ing on the application of H. R. Riggins for a variance to allow the
retention of kitchen facilities in the guest house at 85 W. Lemon
Avenue. Proponents were asked to be heard. Harold Riggins of 85 W.
Lemon, representing himself, attempted to claJ:'ify his position:
(a) Granting of variance would not change a-l restrictions
as to renting. to two families.
(b) It does not change the R-l regulations as to more than
one. family occupying the lot.
(c) It does not constitute in any way a wedge that would be
used in the future that would have any affect if zoning
change were applied for.
(d) If he is wrong in the above statements, he will withdraw
the application for variance.
The Chairman explained that a variance is given to the property, not
to an individual.
Page Three
August 26, 1958
ZONING
E. A. PARK
r-
,
,
Mr. Nicklin stated that it might be possible to so word the varisnce
as to practically restrict any other sub-leasing of the property.
Technically, however, the variance is granted because of conditions
affecting the property, not solely because of conditions personal to
the present owner or tenant.
Mr. Riggins inquired if the variance could be granted with the stip-
ulation that it could not be rented. He intends to continue occupy-
ing the property as a single family use.
The guest house is attached to the garage, and is 16 feet from the
dwelling. They did not know this was in violation until they applied
for permit to build an attached portion to make this one unit. There
were 5 signatures on application favoring the variance as follows:
(1) H. R. Hart 80 W. Lemon Avenue
(2) E. P. Ziegler 105 W. Lemon Avenue
(3) William Steinbrenner 100 W. Lemon Avenue
(4) Walter James 81 W. Lemon Avenue
(5) Henry C. Hand 84 W. Lemon Avenue
No one appeared to contest the matter, but the Secretary read communi-
cations from three property owners residing at 110 W. Norman Avenue,
100 W. Norman Avenue and 86'W. Norman Avenue, and from W. R. James, 81
W. Lemon Avenue protesting the variance.
Motion by Mr. Vachon, seconded by Mr. Michler and carried that the
hearing be continued for staff report, consultation with the Attorney
and Zoning Committee report.
Pursuant to notice given, a public hearing was held on the application
of Park Investment Company .for variance to allow a parking lot on R-l
property located at .1150 W. Foothill Boulevard at the southeast corner
of Michillinda Avenue.
A letter from the applicant, E. A. Park, was read which stated there
would be no permanent buildings, only minor ground improvements, and
outlined the parking needs.
A letter of protest from H. C. Sommer was read.
The staff report stated that the lot currently is zoned R-l, but County
territory across Michillinda Avenue is zoned commercially along Foothill
Boulevard with residential zone to the rear. Sears, Pasadena is being
completed on the northwest corner. Contemplated use of the property is
a parking lot for Sears' employees only for an estimated 343 cars.
Access would be from Michillinda Avenue only; no exits on Foothill Boule-
vard.
Proponects were asked to be heard. Mrs. Elaine Park stated that this
property was presently unsightly and undesirable for residential build-
ings, and that freeway plans make it completely unsaleable for single
residence.
Mr. Stuart Hamblin stated that he owns 10 acres adjacent to this area,
and that he had not been contacted with regard to the petition; further
that he was in favor of granting the variance for the stated purpose.
Opponents wers asked to be heard. Mrs. Jack Rosenburg, 1139 W. Foot-
hill Boulevard presented a petition against the variance, signed by 27
property owners, stating that the variance would deteriorate value of
properties on both sides of Foothill Boulevard with greatest damage
done to those homes on the south side, which probably are the most
Page Four
August 26, 1958
LOT SPLIT
NO. 215
J. R. Hector
LOT SPLIT
NO. 216
Hubbert
I
',--~
expensive in Arcadia. Such variance would make possible other requests
of like nature. The variance would be in violation of Restriction No.
3 of the original Baldwin Deed, which is binding until December 31, 1975.
Mr. John King, who resides on Arbolada Drive, just west of the proposed
parking lot, stated that signals at that corner are not presently regul-
ated for such crossing of traffic. Approximately 200 children in the
neighborhood would need signal protection from the traffic involved,
and he felt this would not be possible.
Mrs Effie Lemar, 3865 Sierr!, Grande, Pasadena, reaffirmed the state-
ment of Mr. King.
Mr. Harry Vawter, 881 W. Foothill Boulevard stated that he represented
165 of the 193 residents in this immediate vicinity, and was opposed to
the parking lot for two reason:
(1) The breaking down of R-l zoning will open the way for
many other applications.
(2) The parking lot is not going to help their property in
any way. In a short time there would be a request for
a building to house the attendant, then a gas station.
He pointed out that recent residential development which would indicate
to him that the property in question could be developed otherwise.
Mr, Vawter recalled incidents in the past years when the City of Arcadia
aided the residents in keeping the R-l zoning in this area.
Mr. Howard Garrison, 970 W. Foothill Boulevard, in the same strip of pro-
perty as that in question, stated that he has over $100,000.00 invested
in his home, and along with every home owner in the immediate vicinity
would do everything possible to keep the property from being developed
for any commercial use, The hearing was declared continued for reports
and a decision at the next meeting.
No. 215. Mr. Julius Hecktor, 1054 S. 10th Avenue, referred to Mr. Stout
and Mr. Michler. The request is to divide the north half of the lot into
two parcels of 57 foot frontages on 10th Avenue. If this split is granted
a driveway should be provided to the carports on Parcel No.1; also,
the carport and guest house operation on the rear of this property is
questionable as to building standards. A condition of the split might
be the removal of the above.
Motion by Mr. Michler, seconded by Mr. Stout and carried that applica-
tion for Lot Split No. 215 be approved subject to the following conditions:
1. Submit a final map to the Ci~ Engineer.
2. Install a sewer lateral for parcel No.2.
3. Pay $25.00 recreation fee.
4. Remove guest house with attached carports from Parcel No. 1
Donald B. Hubbert, 1653 Perkins Drive, referred to Mr. Vachon and Mr.
Davison. The request for division is to provide an area for a swimming
pool for prospective purchaaer. Seller and purchaser will execute coven-
ant that no living quarters will be erected thereon. Division and
subsequent sale would tie the rear portion of Lots 53 and 54 to Lot 57,
which could create definite sewage problems for the owner of Lot 57.
Motion by Mr. Vachon, seconded by Davison and carried that the request
be recommended for approval, subject to the following conditions:
Page Five
August 26, 1958
.. .' ...
RESOLUTION
NO. 306
RESOLUTION
NO. 307
,~--,
,
'--- ~
1. Shift proposed division line 2 feet to the west in order
to keep guest house conforming with a 25 foot rear yard.
2, Require covenant to guarantee no living quarters on
Parcel No.2.
3. Dedicate 5 feet off of Lot 57 for street widening
purposes.
4. File final map with City Engineer.
5. Pay $25.00 recreation fee.
6. Remove storage shed from rear of Lot 54.
No. 306 - The City Attorney presented Resolution No. 306, entitled, "A
Resolution of the City Planning Commission of the City of Arcadia, Calif-
ornia, recommending the granting of a zone variance to permit the construc-
tion of an additional dwelling at 1208 S. Sixth Avenue."
W. H. and F. G. Seimer, owners, have applied for variance to construct an
additional dwelling on the front portion of the south 92.5 feet of the
north 185 feet of Lot 62, Tract No. 808.
Moved by Mr. Michler, seconded by Mr. Stout and carried, to waive the
reading of the full body of Resolution No. 306.
Moved by Mr. Vachon, seconded by Mr, Davison and carried that Resolution
No. 306 be adopted,
No. 307 - The City Attorney presented Resolution No. 307 entitled, "A
Resolution of the City Planning Commission of the City of Arcadia, Calif-
ornia memorializing the services of Michael J. Carozza."
The Resolution reads as follows,:
RESOLUTION NO. 307
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA,
CALIFORNIA, MEMORIALIZING THE SERVICES
OF MICHAEL J. CAROZZA.
WHEREAS, Michael J. Carozza was first employed by the City of
Arcadia on September 6, 1955, and since that time has continuously served
the City of Arcadia as Director of Public Works., City Engineer and Street
Superintendent; and,
WHEREAS, Michael J. Carozza has worked consistently and dili-
gently with the City Planning Commission of the City of Arcadia in solv-
ing the many problems presented to this Commission by a rapidly growing
community; and
WHEREAS, Michael J. Carozza, affectionately known as "Mike"
to all his friends, has exhibited not only the skill and training required
of a registered civil engineer, but in addition has demonstrated a
buoyancy of spirit, an untiring perseverance, a far-sighted approach and
a limitless congeniality with those with whom he came in contact, whether
employer, fellow employee or members of the general public, as a result,
of which the community of Arcadia has made progress and improvement in
its planning, public works construction, beautification program,street
betterments and traffic control; and,
WHEREAS, Michael J. Carozza has indicated his intention to ter-
minate his services with the City of Arcadia and to move from the commun-
ity on September 1, 1958;
Page Six
August 26, 1958
. , , -
ORDINANCE
NO. 990
HUNTINGTON
BLVD.
SETBACK
NOW, THEREFORE. the City Planning Commission of the City of
Arcadia. California, does hereby extend to Michael J. Carozza the apprec-
iation of its members for his invaluable assistance and encouragement in
the performance of this Commission's work. and the best wishes of each
member hereof for success and happiness in. his new position.
The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution
and shall cause a suitable copy hereof to be presented to Michael J.
Carozza.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution Was adopted at
a regular meeting of the City Planning Commission held on the 26th day
of August, 1958. by the following vote:
AYES:
Harold L. Acker
Chairman
Frank E. Vachon
Commissioner
R. E. Davison
Commissioner
D. L. Robertson
Commissioner
Ed. F. Stout
COJlllDissioner
H. T. Michler
COJlllDissioner
ABSENT BUT CONCURRING:
George Forman
Connniss ioner
James A.Nicklin
City Attorney
Neil F. .Anderson
City Manager
L. M. Tulley
Planning Secretary
Moved by Mr. Robertson, seconded by Mr. Vachon and carried unanimously
that Resolution No. 307 be adopted.
Mr. Carozza introduced Mr. Charles E. Lortz. the incoming Director of
Public Works.
A copy of a letter to the Mayor and City Council regarding Ordinance No.
990. suggesting a joint meeting of the City Council with the Planning
Commission to formulate criteria,or a policy for handling future appli-
cations for building of second dwellings in R-l areas were read. A
meeting has been set tentatively for sometime in October for this joint
meeting.
A letter received too late for agenda will be placed on next agenda
reques ting a change of setback line from 50 feet to 35 feet on the south
side of Huntington Blvd., west of Baldwin Avenue to west City limits.
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned.
'Jf ':":" ~
Planning Secretary
Page Seven
August 26, 1958