HomeMy WebLinkAboutJULY 11, 1961
,
ROLL CALL
MINUTES
NEW PLANNING
DIRECTOR
ZONE VARIANCE
745-751 W.
Camino Real
..
-",--.
.,. ,..--.
(
"--
,
~--
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA
REGULAR MEETING
July 11, 1961
The Planning Commission of the City of Arcadia met in regular session in
the Council Chamber of the City Hall at 8:00 o'clock P.M., July 11, 1961,
with Vice Chatpman Forman presiding.
PRESENT:
Commissioner Ferguson, Forman, Golisch, Michler, Norton
snd 'Rutherford.
ABSENT:
Commissioner Acker,.
OTHERS PRESENT: City Attorney James A. Nicklin,
Director of Public Works C. E. Lortz,
Planning Director William Phelps and
Planning Secretary L. M. Talley
The minutes of the meetings of June IJ and June 27, 1961 wer,e approved
as written and mailed.
Vice Chairman Forman introduced Mr. William Phelpa, the new Planning
Director from Phoenix, Arizona, who was at~ending the meeting for the
first time.
The Vice Chairman announced that this was the time and plsce for tbe
'bearing on the application of Arcadia Parking, Inc. for a zone variance to
allow automobile parking at 145-751 W. Naomi Avenue.
The Plsnning Chairman exhibited a plot plan showing the area under consider-
ation. -
The application states that the property involved is immedistely adjscent
to other property that is being used for parking area on the north and
on the east. This will not be materially detrimental since the intended
use of the property for parking will only be extending the area already
so used. It will not affect the other property. In the past, under prior
ownership the property was used as a commercial plant nursery. The improve-
ment of this property for parking would be substantially less noisy and a
better use of. the land than the nursery operation. Additionsl parking
facilities are needed in connection with other property of the applicant.
This parking will be beneficial to the comprehensive general plan.
The Planning Secretary presented the staff report as follows:
'''This is the application of Arcadia Parking Inc. for a zone varisnce to
allow the property at 745-751 Naomi Avenue to be used for automobile psrking.
The property 'is s part of Zone R-2. All of the improvements have been
removed.
Under Section 9253.1.7 of the zoning ordinance the lot at 745 Naomi Avenue
may automatically be used for parking.
July 11, 1961
psge One
~~
\
I
...J
""-
,~./
The property to the east is owned by the appUcant, is zone C-2 and is
used as a parking lot.. The property to the north is owned by a church
and the rear portion is used as a parking lot. The property to the west
is Zone R-2 and is used for residential purposes and the adjoining lot is
headquarters for a transfer and storage company. Directly scross the
street to the south, property is zoned 9.-2 and used for residentisl purposes.
South east is the-parking lot for Shopping Bag Market.
If the variance is grsnted ,the following conditions should apply:
1. Construct a 6 foot concrete block wall along the west
property line, except t~at the front 25 feet should
be 4 feet high.
2. Construct concrete curb, gutter snd sidewalk along the
front of the subject property, including the 100.9
foot lot adjacent on the east, in accordance with
City specification, and to grades satisfactory to the
Director of Public Works.
3. Pave the property to be used ,for parking.
4. Submit grading plans to the Department of Public Works
for approval as to grades.
One communication had been received. This 'was from Mr. Freemsn Gates,
755 West Naomi Ave, immediately adjacent to the west. Mr. Gates stated
that due, to the heavy traffic on Naomi Avenue, west of Baldwin Avenue,
he requested that a masonry wall be constructed on the west side of the
property under consideration; and that the wall be commenced a minimum
of 20 feet ,north of Naomi Ave. or the first 20 feet being only 3 feet
high so that sight clearance would be obtained in cOming out of his
drivewsy into traffic.
The Vice Chairman announced that, this was the time and place for the hearing
on the application of Arcadia Parking, Inc., fora zone variance to allow
automobile' parking at 745-751 W. Naomi Ave.
AU those in favor of the application Were requested to come forward
and present supporting material.
Mr. Don Ehr, of Hinshaw's, represented Arcadia Parking, Inc. He stated
there is a definite need for additional parking in this area. The areas
north and east are in use as parking; the 'residence on the west is not
in opposition but requests the wall to act as a buffer. The only problem,
in his opinion, is the expense of curbs and gutters for this area. There
are no cubs and gutters between Baldwin Avenue and Golden West Avenue.
This street is extremely narrow and most of the people who park on the
street actually are parking in the area reserved for sidewalks. He felt
the construction of' curbs and gutters would reduce the street parking.
He thought perhaps this' should be reserved until some future dste when
widening of the street should be considered.
The Director of Public Works stated Mr. Ehr's remarks were well taken
however, a long range program should be considered. Ultimately curbs and
gutters will be constructed in this area. The present policy of the city
is to extend the pavement to the new curb at no expense to the property
owner. The street is 50 and 55 feet. Probsbly 40 feet between curbs.
There are curbs and gutters along the commercial portion of the property
facing on Baldwin Ave. The street has two 12 foot travelling lanes and
two 8 foot parking lanes, which is considered a standard street. Because
of the pedestrian traffic in this area, a, sidewalk would be of tremendous
value.
The question of, "no parking" was discus,sed. It was determined thst this
should be considered at a future time.
July 11, 1961
Page Tw,o
ZONE VARIANCE.
720~728 W..
Camino Real
r'
-,
'--j
The creation of additional parking lots would of necessity remove certain
on_street parking. Mr.' Ehr preferred the "no parking" regulation be
eliminated as there is need for all parking possible. This should not be
done unless there are very substantial reasons.
Commissioner Norton requested information ss to the parking spaces on the
street -now. It was determined about 220 feet or approximately ten spaces
would be on the street, and probably less because of the one driveway. The
pedestrian traffic in this area is hesvy enough to warrant improvements
and if the curb and gutter. as well as sidewalks, were installed a definite
traffic hazard would be removed.
Those opposed to the variance were requested to present information, and
no one desired to be heard.
Moved by Commissioner Norton, seconded by Commissioner Ferguson, and
unanimously carried that the public hearing be closed.
Discussion followed snd 1t was the opinion of the Commissioners that the
request was compatible to needs in the ares; that the improvements as
outlined by the Director of Public Works were an important safet~ factor.
Mr. Ehr was asked whether or not it was the intention to plant trees in order
to enhance the appearance of the srea. He stated there were seversl trees
on the property and none would be removed except those which interferred
with construction. Planting of new trees had not been considered at this
time. A certain amount of landscaping has been used throughout former
parking areas and no doubt would be used here.
Moved by Commissioner Golisch, seconded by Commissioner Norton, that the
application of Arcadia Parking, Inc. for a ~one variance to allow automobile
parking at 745-751 W. Naomi Avenue be recommended for approval, subject
to the conditions set forth in the Staff report.
Said motion was carried on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Ferguson, Forman, Golisch, Michler,
Norton and Rutherford.
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Acker.
'The application of Paul M.
spd Sierra-Camino Inc. for
720-728 W. Camino Real was
and Ethel Porter, Charles F. and Mary Becker
a zone variance to allow hotel residence at
considered.
The application states thst an exclusive hotel residence for retired
persons is proposed. This will be limited to those that are healthy and
ambulatory and will not include any narcotics, alcoholics or mentslly ill
persons. A lounge and dining room will be provided and a landscaped
garden which will include quiet recreational facilities for older adults,
The present property is occupied by five houses all of which sre over ten
years old; the property should be improved with structures more in keeping
with the community. The adjacent properties to the east will be occupied
by a service station and business buildings, and a convalescent home will
be located to the ,south by reason of zone variances. '
It is felt the development of this property will be an asset to the community.
A retirement hotel will be a good buffer between the commercial and the R-2
zone to the west. This is a planned program and is under the guidance of
July 11, 1961
Page Three
!
~j
~
\
I
Retirement Home Planners, Inc. and the architectural design is by Smith
and Williams, Architects.
Considerable research has been made which indicates that the highest and
best use of the pr~perty is a hotel residence for retired persons. This
project would be of considerable benefit to the City of Arcsdia and will
complement and. support other facUities, including the Methodist Hospital,
Medical Centers and Convalescent homes, and the adjacent shopping district
which is within easy walking distance.
It is felt this will not adversely aff"ct the comprehensive genersl plan in
that no automobile traffic load will be added as a very small percentage
of the, occupants will drive; no school load will be added; recreational
fscilities will be, provided on the property and adjacent shopping area is
mor.e than sdequate for the convenience of the occupants.
The Planning Secretary read the staff report as follows:
"This is the application of Paul M. and Ethel E. Porter., Chsrles F. and Mary
Becker and Sierra-Camino, Inc. for a zone variance to allow a hotel residence
for retired persons. The lot is 132 ft. by 300 ft, and contains 39,600 sq.
ft.
It is in Zone R-2 and is now developed with five dwellings. Property to the
west and northwest is zoned R-2. Property north east is Zone R-3 and C-2.
Property to the east is in Zone R-l but has comniercial uses by a variance
granted by Resolution No. 3315.
A service station is ,under construction at the corner of Camino Real and
Baldwin Avenue and the balance of the property hss been cleared of buildings.
Property to the south is in Zone a-I
No. 3316 allows a convalescent home.
done on this property.
but a variance granted by ~esolution
To date no physical work has been
The plan for the subject property proposes the removal of all the existing
improvements and the construction of the proposed hotel-residence.
The kitchen, dining and lounge area is one story and contains about 3500
sq. ft. The balance of the building is two stories. In addition' to office
space, a T.V. room, hobby room, and the director's apartment, provision
is made for 9 suites, 25 semi-suites, and 10 single rooms. The two story
portion of the building, contains about 17,660 sq. ft. of floor sres.
The plot plan provides for a 20 foot driveway leading to a parking lot
for 2S automobiles at the rear of the property. Five parking spaces are
provided at the front for visitor parking.
If the variance is granted consideration should be given to the following
requirements.
1. Construct concrete curb, gutter snd sidewalk along the
entire frontage of the property, in accordance with
City specifications to grades satisfactory to the
Director of Public Works.
2. Construct a 6 ft. high concrete block wall slong each side
and the rear of the property unless it has otherwise been
provided, except that said wall should be 4 feet high
adjacent to the 25 foot ,front yard.
July 11, 1961
Page Four
'--~-
, 3. The driveway and the entire parking lot should be paved, with
I drainage facilities satisfactory to the Director of Public
Works.
The Planning Secretary exhibited an architectural rendering and plan
submitted by the applicant and outlined the various use.s in the area.
The Chairman announced that this was the time and place for the hearing
on the application of Paul M. and Ethel Porter, Charles F. and Mary
Becker and Sierra-Camino, Inc. for a zone variance to allow s hotel
residence for retired persons at nO-n8W. Camino Real.
Those in favor of the application were requested to present supporting
material.
Mr. Milton.Hadley, attorney representing the petitioners, stated this
development is to be a high calibre type operation for the use of retired
senior citizens. There were many people in the audience who were
interested in this project among them being Mr. Otto Gruber,. Director
of Home Planners, who has served as Executive Director of the Southern
California Presbyterian Homes, who operates Royal Oaks Manor in Duarte.
Other residences are the White Sands at La Jolla and one in Glendale.
These programs do meet the needs and desires of the senior citizen.
Mr. Gru,ber had also served as President of the Association of Homes
for the dbad in Southern California, and was Chairman of the State
of California Advisory Committee on Aging. He had worked closely
in thep'reparation of the manual which is used by the Department of Social
Welfare, and this year he was the official delegate from the State of
California to the White House Conference meeting in Washington,D. C.
Commissioner Norton inquired as to the needs of the community for this
type of development. Mr. Gruber stated that through his associations
and experiences he had found that senior citizens are just beginning
to come into their own. They are a real asset to any community. Through-
out the nation the general trend is to bring these people into a community
where they can be a part of it and share in the real life of the community.
La Jolla has several fine homes and they are a definite benefit. Royal
Oaks Manor is another example of such a home. These homes are well '
located and will add much to the community.
The question was also asked as to the rental to be charged for such a
home. The development proposed is for the middle class of society
who feel their dependence but need fellowship. There are those in
the teaching profession, business people, etc, not indigent but who
would be able to pay for their care. Medical care would be outside
of the residence. The purpose of this type of residence would be for
contacts and if. any emergency develops someone will call for assistance.
There would be a director or ,manager on call 24 hours. This type would
be licensed by the State Department of Welfare so this would take it
out of the cold realm of a hotel as such. This type of development is
carefully supervised by the State Department of Welfare.
All medical would be the responsibility of the person living in the
building. Mr. Gruber was further questioned as to whether or not they
had applicants for residence in the hotel immediately upon its completion.
He stated they had had calls from people who would like such arrangements,
but specifically nothing had been signed up until it was determined that
the building could be constructed. There were long waiting lists at
the other hotels so constructed. The capacity would be approximately
65 to 80. All rooms would be of a size approved by the State Department
of Welfare. This size building is adequate for successful operation
from a monetary standpoint. It would not necessarily follow that more
July 11, 1961
Page Five
ZONE VARIANCE
920S. Second
Avenue.
,
, ,
~\
J
r
land would be required at a future date to expand the operation
fr,om a financial standpoint. This is projected for a permanent
type of residence: however, it i9 possible for an occupant to change
from one locality to another, occupying approximately the same type
of suit~, and at the same monthly rental. This is a monthly pay-as-you-
go plan.
'-.-.........
Mr. Grti!>'er was asked what prerequIsite would be necessary for a person
or a couple to occupy the property. There were basic fsctors: they
must be capable of taking csre of themselves; must be over 65 years
of age; and will be carefully screened and able financially to care
forthe~elves. This will be a resident hotel and not for trsnsients.
Mr. .Whitney Smith, one of the architects, was asked the size of the
individual rooms, etc. He stated the single type room was the most
common. There would be ten with individual baths; this would be the
usual h9tel bedroom; and because of the need for companionship, the
dining rOom and lounge would be used for entertainment, etc. The
rooms on the second floor would be served by an elevator. There are
three types of accommodations - the single room; the semi-suite, which
is a larger room and has a divider with the bed being in a type of
alcove; ,and the suite which would have a bedroom and a living room.
This, could be used for two bedrooms if desired by the occupants.
The single would be approximately 14' by 15'. The semi-suite would
beabout 14' by 17'. The suite would be two rooms,each 11' by 12' or
14'. A projection had been made of the general range to make possible
the loWest rate to be charged. This has to be done on a monthly basis
where other homes have a lump sum price fixed. The charge projects
the initial, capital cost plus the services. With the construction charges
not fixed, it is difficult to determine but it would ra~ge from $275.00"
to $300.00 per month, and up. This development 'would be under the State
Department of Public Welfare. They approve it and license it. If it is
approved there is an accepted plan of size and type of rooms. The
driveway provided is 20 feet. This meets the requirement for the R-3
zone under the new ordinance.
Those opposed to the variance were asked to state their views.
Mr. Frank Kelly, 725 Callita Street stated he was opposed to the variance.
Most of the area was R-l and there were new residences on Call ita Street
and he felt the general area should be maintained as R-l. He felt this
was not the proper area for a hotel and should not encroach on the area
of residences. He was not opposed to the project itself, but to the
area proposed.
Inasmuch as this is the first proposal of this type and there is much
to be studied, the Chairman suggested that the matter be referred to
the Zoning Committee for further study. There may be conditions to
be imposed in order to protect the community, if this variance were
granted.
Moved by Commissioner ~chler, seconded by CommiSSioner Golisch, and
unanimously carried, that the matter of the variance for'the resident
hotel as proposed, be referred to the Zoning Committee to report back
to the Planning Commission at the next .regular meeting.
The application of Dr.. C. M. and Helen M. Baxter for a zone variance
to allow two duplexes and garages at 920 S. Semnd Avenue was considered.
"
The Planning Secretary exhibited a map of the area and explained the
area and the alley to the north that is being improved at the present
time.
The application sets out the proposed use of having two duplexes on an
July 11, 1961
Page Si,x
,~
undersized lot. This lot is 80 feet wide but only 108 feet deep,
making it economically impractical to put but one duplex on it. There
is adequate room for the two duplexes as shown on pictures which were
displayed. These buildings are presently located in Arcadia on Foot-
hillBoulevard on an almost identical lot. The buildings have been
inspected and confrom to the Building Code. The property has been
for sale for many months and interested parties were discouraged
when it was learned but one duplex could be constructed on the lot
without a variance. The property to the north is C zonej making it
impractical to build expenaive two or three bedroom rentals. The
duplexes would have one bedroom. The placement of the two duplexes on
the property in place, of the existing building would be an asset to
the area. There is a proposed parking lot to the rear of the property
which would be enclosed with a solid masonry wall which is proposed to
be built around the property. The dedicated alley to the north of
the property is advantageous to the proposed use of the property and
could not be adversely affected. This variance would solve the prob-
lems of this parcel of land without need for a variance on other R-2
property, and without the problems found on this particular parcel.
Normally, much land is required for driveways. This proposal makes
good use of the dedicated alley and eliminates the need for other
driveways. 'The area would be nicely landscaped. The applicant
proposes to, use brick planters and to landscape the entire area, making
it an asset.to the area.
Enlarged photographs were sho~ of the duplexes on the property on
Foothill Boulevard.
The staff report was presented by the Planning Secretary as follows:
'~his is the application 'of Dr. C. M. Baxter for a zone variance to
allow two duplexes to be moved from 142-144-146- and 148 E. Foothill
Boulevard to 920 S. Second Avenue.
The lot is 80 feet by 108.46 feet containing 8676 square feet. It
is in Zone R-2 which would normally allow one duplex.
It now has a very old house and garage, as shown in the photographs
submitted.
The lot is located across an alley from Zone C~l. If it actually
abutted the commercial property a three-family or four-family dwelling
would be permitted under Section 9253.1.3 of the Zoning Ordinance.
The plot plan as submitted shows a 23 foot front. yard as required
by the Zoning Ordinance. This leaves a narrow driveway between the
duplexes and the garages. No. front yard is required on the commercial
property north of the alley. If this variance is granted, consideration
should be given to some variance of the front yard to allow a more
adequate driveway width.
Discussion followed. If the front se,tback were modified there would
be more area between the garages and the duplexes. This is now 9
feet wide but would be increased if the front setback were lessened.
Directly across the street is another R-2 lot, but is being. used for
R-l purposes. The surrounding area is R-l. There are signed consents
from the immediate neighbors. The duplexes contain one bedroom each.
The Chairman announced that this was the time and place for the hearing
on the application of Dr. C. M. and Helen M. Baxter for a zone variance
to allow two duplexes and garages at 920 S. Second Avenue, and requested
those in favor to present their case.
Dr. C. M. Baxter, owner of the subject property, stated that this
July 11, 1961
Page Seven
"'---',
'~
I
,_/
'~-_/
had proven to be a problem. The building located on the property does
not enhance the area; however, being an R-2 zone becomes a rental proper-
ty and it is not feasible to remove the building and rebuilding just one
duplex. The improvement as stated would be an asset to the area.
The 20 foot alley is in the process of being improved and psved and
would eliminate the necessity of having a driveway to the rear of the
property. 'The owner to the south was .in agreement and had intended
to be at tais meeting. He has signed for the variance. There is
no opposition to his knowledge. It is l!is intention to nicely land-
scape the area. He had options on the buildings and they are in the
process of being moved from their present sites at this time, so thst
'any favorable action or any assistance would assist him in completing
this project.
Each of the buildings contain 1200 square feet - 600 per unit. The
living room is 12' x 18' and the bedrooms are 12' X 12'; kitchen is
6' x 12" and the standard ,size bathroom. These, are modern buildings
approximately is years, shingle roof, frame and stucco buildings.
The Chairman requested those opposed to so state snd no one desired
to be heard.
Dis,cussion followed. The question was raised as to the proposed house
moving ordinance and if these duplexes would meet the requirements
of the proposed ordinance. The Planning Secretary stated that to his
knowledge the buildings would meet the standards.
Moved by Commissioner Norton" seconded by Commissioner Rutherford, and
unanimously carried that the hearing be closed.
Inasmuch as this property does abut, C-2 zoning the request is reason-
able. CommissionerCNorton did desire to go on record that he would
not want thiS to become infectiOUS as to the type of variance for the
balance of, the area. The rest of the area is definitely R-l zoning.
He favored the variance since it is in the R-2 category.
It was agreed that with this ,property abutting the C-~it is a
reasonable request.
The Planning Secretary stated that the plot plan submitted with the
application was the original drawing and was later taken out to have
prints made. Thibr~ort was written without the plot plan, which
shows 27 foot set/\n front, 23 is all that is required after the
dedication for widening so that 4 feet can be added to the driveway
without any variance. This would give plenty of driving area - 13
feet, and the new ordinance calls for 12-1/2 feet.
Moved by Commissioner Norton, seconded by Commissioner Michler, that
the application of Dr. C. M. and Helen M. Baxter for a zone variance
to allow two duplexes and garages at 92b South Second Avenue be
recommended. for approval.
Said motion was carried on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Ferguson, Forman, Golisch, Michler,
Norton and Rutherford.
NOJ!:S: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Acker.
VARIANCE
EXTENSION
(Margolin)
The request of Nate ,Margolin for an extension of time of the zone
variance at Santa Anita Avenue and Live ,Osk Avenue was reconsidered.
The Secretary stated he had no new material to present but the matter
July 11, 1961
Page Eight
)
had been continued from the last Planning Commission meeting.
Mr. Phillip M. Newman, attorney for Mr. Margolin, was present. He
stated that the conference held with the City Attorney had reached
a tentative agreement for the meeting of pos~ible objections of the
Commission. The letter from Mr. Margolin as read into the record
stated certain proposed arrangements for the..completion of the
project. He read a letter from Miles C. Babcock, Real Estate Financing,
350 North Bedford Drive, Beverly Hills, California, dated July 7, 1961,
and addressed to Mr. Nate Margolin, 338 N. Rodeo Drive, Beverly Hills,
CalifornIa, relative to the South Arcadia Shopping Center, Arcadia,
which stated that pertaining to the discussion held yesterday (July
6, 1961) they had a lender that had examined the loan applicstion and
is interested on the basis of the following terms:
The amount
The interest
,Terms
$1,200,000.00
6'7.
20 years
The lender had been given a full set of details and the progress, and
had also made an inspection of the property. They'would recommend
the loan immediately to ,the final loan committee. They knew the
company rather well and would expect the commitment to be forthcoming
within ten days. Mr,. Ne~an stated that since the letter was written
the principal has been disclosed. It is the Lincoln National Life
Insurance Co. With reference to the second problem, that is, to what
guarantee the City would have that the project would be completed
withi!l the specified time,he stated that there is now a mQre workable
solution and that meeting with representatives of a bond company he
had ascer~ained that a surety bond ~ould be procured indemnifying the
City of Arcadia at the rate of $100.00 per day for each working day
beyond the stip~lated date in the letter. He stated he desired to
submit that the financial arrangements are under way which should be
completed within ten days and they would be in a position to post a
bond.
The City Attorney stated that at the last meeting the Commission
approved the substance of the letter of Mr. Margolin with the exception
of the security that was to be provided for the indemnity agreement;
that was refBrred back to the Attorney for further negotiations. At
the prelimioary dicusssions Mr. Margolin was unable to state that it
was possible to get a bond. A surety bond would be preferable to'
other proposals. This would be forthcoming in the event it was
necessary to use it. Mr. Newman also desired to state that the General
Contractor would also have a bond for faithful performance of his con-
tract. '
Discussion followed., Commissioner Norton requested information as to
the expected ten days for determination of the loan. Mr. Newman
stated the assumption was that the ten day period was from ttie date
of the letter. The work would commence immediately follOWing the
commitment providing everything is clear with the California Bank who
has the present loan. There would be some processing to be done by
them. The appraisal and-all normal checking has been completed. There
is no way of knowing whether there would be a day or two days or a
week before work could commence. He would have no way of knowing this.
Commissioner Norton stated that it would be with the full understanding
that everything would be completed so far as plans and the design,work
and that Mr. Margolin would be prepared to commence where he left off.
July 11, 1961
Page Nine
\
.....J
Mr. Margolin stated everything was completed with the exception of a
few structural changes which have been held in abeyance. This will be
resubmitted to the City for a final check. The parking outlined will
remain. Mr. Margolin had an outline of the proposal to the Lincoln
National Life Insurance Co. and many times the outline and the actual
commitment could differ. There may be a difference with the interim
lender. He would have no way of knowing this at this time. There were
no obstacles so far as he knew.
The Chairman requested the pleasure of the Commission as to the deter-
minationof the matter.
The City Attorney advised that the former minutes reflected the approval
of the proposal made by the property owner with the exception of the
security afforded. A corporate surety bond could be accepted as the
type of indemnity bond.
Commissioner Norton stated that in keeping with the City Attorney's
remarks the surety bond is s satisfactory type to indemnify the City
in case the project is not completed, he would move that the surety bond
be accepted as the media of security for the completion of the project.
Said motion was seconded by Commissioner Ferguson and unanimously
carried.
Commissioner Golisch stated that in the minutes of June 13, there is
an indication that an application with Frank and Co. for a permanent
mortgage was in process and there were no unusual circumstances surround-
ing this and that as soon as the completion of the processing, they
would be in a position to issue the usual commitment. On June 27, it
was indicated certain problems had arisen again with the Mutual Life
Insurance Co. ,and'now there is another agency being brought into the
picture. Each time with a statement that it would be concluded within
a few days. He would not vote for an extension unless the absolute
commitment for financing is before the commission.
The City Attorney stated that this probably was not the time to consider
the extension on the variance for a number of reasons: Work will not
stsrt immeidately without the issuance of the title policy alone;
there is the working out of the final commitment by the Lincoln National
Life Insurance Co., and the acceptance of the commitment by the California
Bank. Furthermore, there is the preparation of the formal indemnity
agreement which has not been prepared and which is the basis of the
extension. The conditions have been approved but the agreement should
be drawn, approved and executed and the bond procured. This could be
tendered at the same time that they tender the information on the loan
commitment and then it would be ready for action. If the formal
approval of the extension were deferred until the next meeting, Mr.
Margolin should be in a position by that time to advise of the actual
commitment. This still would not delay them any because there is still
some excavation work to be completed.
CommiSSioner Norton wanted to go on record as stating the Commission was
working in the interes'ts of both the City of Arcadia its well as with
Mr. Margolin. The CommiSSion is interested in the successful completion
of this project. The letter presented would indicate a valid intention.
Each of the Commissioners expressed himself. It was the consensus of
opinion that the extension should be contigent upon the dates of com-
pletion so that ~r. Margolin would be within the time allocated. It was
hoped that the present lender could see fit to carry through the commit-
me'!t.
June 11, 1961
Page Ten
ANNEXATION
"),
..
The' City Attorney stated he felt the feeling of the Commission is that
sooner or later a point would be reached as to whether the extension
would be granted or would not, without reference to the completion date.
It was agreed that each one wanted to see the project completed, and
with a project as large as this there is time involved.
The City Attorney further stated the time is about here when the
Commission will state the request is denied and the variance is thereby
terminated by operation of law. It would seem more than appropriate to
spread on. the minutes at some stage of the procedure,a declaration of
intent that if the matter is not culminated within two weeks, or a
time fixed by the Commission, no further extension of time on the request
for the extension on the variance will be allowed. This would serve as
advance warning to the applicant that :he" must move, regardless of the
obstacles, and that the matter willgo ahead, even though it means going
back to the original zoning.
Commissioner Norton moved that the matter of the decision be held over
until the next regular meeting. The commitment, as stated by Mr. Newman,
should be due ten days from the date of the letter received by Mr.
Margolin, which was July 7th, and that at the meeting of July 25,
which would allow more than the ten days anticipated, final decision
would be made.
Said motion was seconded by Commissioner Golisch and unanimously carried.
The report on the proposed annexation north of Camino Real and west of
Mayflower Avenue was considered.
The Planning Secretary presented a report 'from the Police DepaJ:'tment
to the effect that the area is composed of approximately 20 parcels
and an approximate population of 60 plus persons; the area is bounded on
the east by Mayflower Avenue which at this particular location is a
county controlled and maintained street.
Camino Real on the south is likewise a county controlled and maintained
street. This means that persons living in the area must enter from
streets not within the City of Arcadia. Traffic accidents and other
incidents on the street would be investigated and handled by the Los
Angeles County Sheriff's office. Ingress and egress into the area would
be on Shrode Street which is sub-standard as to width insofar as
the standard of Arcadia is concerned. Atcompletion, the street would
be 26 feet curb to curb, instead of 36 feet which is the city standard.
The Police Department could not anticipate or for see any appreciable
increase of the department's work load or additional patrol problems
if this property is annexed. The sub-standard width of Shrode Street
would make it rather difficul to pass csrs proceeding in the opposite
direction, particularly if automobiles are parked at the curb on either or
both sides. There would be no need to actually patrol Shr.ode Street ss
there is sight view to the end ,of the street from vehicles using Msyflower
Avenue.
The report from the Fire Department stated thst so far as that Depsrtment
is concerned this area does not seem to create any problems. They had
checked with the water company t hi! t :4erves that location and there is
adequate water to give the required fire protection. With the comple-
tion of Shrode Street, there will also be an additional hydrant to serve
the annexed property.
A further report was received 'from the Director of Public Works to the
effect that the streets in and near the proposed annexation were field
checked. They appear from surface examination to be improved to Los
July 11, -1961
Page Eleven
AUDIENCE
PARTICIPATION
COUNCIL
LIAISON
"~
,_/
Angeles County Road Department standards. Altern Street has curb and
gutter at a36 foot width and has asphaltic pavement. Shrode Street,
(new street) is being improved in conjunction with the development of
the new tract west of Mayflower Avenue. This is a cui de sac with
40 foot right of way and, 26 feet curb to curb. The improvement will
be curb, 2' gutter, 1 cross gutter snd 2" pavement on 4" base.
Camino Real and Mayflower Avenue do not have curb and gutter at present.
They have an 80 foot right of way with 56 feet of pavement with rolled
asphalt gutters.
There are very few street lights in the area.
could be mounted on existing wood poles. The
maintained up to this time.
Additional lights
streets have been well
Photographs were presented showing the area requested to be annexed.
Discussion followed.
Mr. Bauman, subdivider of the Shrode Street tract, was present and
answered questions relative to the lot size, street widths, etc.
A report from the Planning Commission to the Regional Planning Commission
at the time of the de annexation was referred to as showing the lots did
not meet Arcadia standards.
The City Attorney stated that if the annexation were to be processed
it would be done under the Annexation Act of 1913, inhabited. It is
required that the matter be referred to the Planning Commission before
Council action.
Mr. Bauman stated the annexation
subdivision included but 6 lots.
given the entire area.
was for 20 properties and the new
He felt that consideration should be
,Moved by Commissioner Rutherford, seconded by Commissioner Golisch,
that the annexation of the property north of Camino Real and west of
Mayflower be recommended for denial inasmuch as the lots do not conform
to the standards of the City of Arcadia, nor are the widths of the
street constructed to city standards.
Said motion was carried on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Ferguson, Forman, Golisch, Michler,
Norton and Rutherford.
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Acker.
There was no audience participation.
Commissioner Goliseh reported that the Council is anxious to have work
done on the House Moving Ordinance. 'Because 'of the lack of personnel
in the Planning Department-this has been held up, but some recommendation
should be given at an early date.
The question of Naomi Avenue rezoning had been discussed. It was the
opinion that the zone change should be denied ,not from the standpoint
of being denied, but that consideration should be given the entire area.
The Manager had presented a report which in essence was an approval for
the zone change with Zone D regulations, such as dedication of certain
July 11, 1961
Page Twelve
,
ANNEXATION
McBane
WEST ARCADIA
HCIlE OWNERS
ASSOCIATION
RESOLUTION
NO. 414
-
areas, landscaping, restrictions as to signs and all plans to be approved
by the Planning Commission. It would still represent a zone change just
for the six lots.
A further matter had come before the Council, that is, the classification
of business for Mr. Lynch which had been previously considered by the
COlIDIIiasion. The, CouncH felt there should be a review of the ordinance
insofar as definitions are concerned, especially as to wholesale and
retail, etc.
At the last meeting the lot at 1167 W.Duarte Road was recommended to the
City Council for annexation, and that prime facie it should be R-3
because everything east of this lot is R-3 in the City of Arcadia. This
recOllDllendation went to the Council and if the Council looked with favor
proceeding further with the annexation they would then take the necessary
steps to so advise the COlIDIIission and a formal hearing would be held on
the zoning. They have now advised the staff to proceed further with it
so it is appropriate to fix a hearing date.
It was determined that August 8, 1961 should be fixed as the date for
public hearing on the zoning for the lot located at 1167 W. Duarte Road.
The Planning Secretary read a letter from the West Arcadia Home Owners
Association, directed to Mr. Acker, stating that it has come to the
attention of the Associaticnby the minutes of the Arcadia Planning
COlIDIIission and the City Cou"cil that the area affected by Ordinance 1071,
in part or in whole is again under consideration by the city body. SOme-
time' ago the Planning COlIDIIission extended representatives of the West
Arcadia Home Owners Association the courtesy to be at a special meeting
at which time the view of the members could be stated in regard to the
six lots in the area that was then in the process of rezoning. This
meeting was an informal and amiable discussion of ideas for some solution
to this controversial area from both the residential area and cOllDllercial
points of view. It is the hope of this organization that if any future
discussions regarding this particular area are held that this group be
notified so that there may be representation at the meeting. They
requested advice by letter if this courtesy could be extended.
The City Attorney stated in this connection information will be coming
relative to a bill passed by the last legislature by amending the Brown
Act, which wfllinclude all boards and cOllDllissions. The Act will not
become effective until SepteritJer 15, 1961, but when signed by the Governor
it will apply to this COlIDIIission. Information will be forwarded to the
COlIDIIission by the Attorney when this becomes effective. While it was
not a legal problem in the past, it could well become one in the future.
The Secretary was instructed to answer' the letter by stating the matter
had been acted upon by the Planning COlIDIIission and that it is now before
the City Council.
The City Attorney presented Resolution No. 414 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THE
GRANTING OF A ZONE VARIANCE TO PERMIT ,THE ERECTION
AND MAINTENANCE OF TWO DUPLEXES AND GARAGES ON THE
PROPERTY SITUATED AT 920 SOUTH SECOND AVENUE.
Moved'by COlIDIIissioner Ferguson, seconded by COlIDIIissionerMichler, and
unanimously carried that the reading of the full body of Resolution No.
414 be waived.
July 11, 1961
Page Thirteen
ELECTION OF
CHAIRMAN
-j
""'/.
Moved by Commissioner Ferguson, se~onded by Commissioner Norton that
Resolution No. 414 be adopted.
Said motion was carried on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Ferguson, Forman, Golisch, Michler
Norton and Rutherford.
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commis,sioner Acker.
The Planning Secretary stated. that according to the Code it is necessary
as soon as ,practical after July 1st to elect a chairman and vice-
chairman. This is sometimes done by ballot and sometimes by motion.
Moved by Commissioner Michler, seconded by Commissioner Rutherford
that George Forman be nominated for Chairman:- ~'_J ~ , ~
COmmissioner Golisch nominated Ralph Norton.
Motion was made and carried to close the nominations.
Ballots were prepared and
the vote there were three
for Commissioner Norton.
arrived home and had not
the meeting. The matter
distributed to each member. Upon polling
votes for Commissioner Forman and three votes
Commissioner Acker was contacted but had just
yet had dinner. He did not wish to come to
was continued until the next regular meeting.
There being no further business to come before the Commission the meeting
adjourned at 10: 30 P'.M.
;f?)w.~ d " , ./
L. M. TAL~:~
Planning Secretary