Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutJULY 11, 1961 , ROLL CALL MINUTES NEW PLANNING DIRECTOR ZONE VARIANCE 745-751 W. Camino Real .. -",--. .,. ,..--. ( "-- , ~-- MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA REGULAR MEETING July 11, 1961 The Planning Commission of the City of Arcadia met in regular session in the Council Chamber of the City Hall at 8:00 o'clock P.M., July 11, 1961, with Vice Chatpman Forman presiding. PRESENT: Commissioner Ferguson, Forman, Golisch, Michler, Norton snd 'Rutherford. ABSENT: Commissioner Acker,. OTHERS PRESENT: City Attorney James A. Nicklin, Director of Public Works C. E. Lortz, Planning Director William Phelps and Planning Secretary L. M. Talley The minutes of the meetings of June IJ and June 27, 1961 wer,e approved as written and mailed. Vice Chairman Forman introduced Mr. William Phelpa, the new Planning Director from Phoenix, Arizona, who was at~ending the meeting for the first time. The Vice Chairman announced that this was the time and plsce for tbe 'bearing on the application of Arcadia Parking, Inc. for a zone variance to allow automobile parking at 145-751 W. Naomi Avenue. The Plsnning Chairman exhibited a plot plan showing the area under consider- ation. - The application states that the property involved is immedistely adjscent to other property that is being used for parking area on the north and on the east. This will not be materially detrimental since the intended use of the property for parking will only be extending the area already so used. It will not affect the other property. In the past, under prior ownership the property was used as a commercial plant nursery. The improve- ment of this property for parking would be substantially less noisy and a better use of. the land than the nursery operation. Additionsl parking facilities are needed in connection with other property of the applicant. This parking will be beneficial to the comprehensive general plan. The Planning Secretary presented the staff report as follows: '''This is the application of Arcadia Parking Inc. for a zone varisnce to allow the property at 745-751 Naomi Avenue to be used for automobile psrking. The property 'is s part of Zone R-2. All of the improvements have been removed. Under Section 9253.1.7 of the zoning ordinance the lot at 745 Naomi Avenue may automatically be used for parking. July 11, 1961 psge One ~~ \ I ...J ""- ,~./ The property to the east is owned by the appUcant, is zone C-2 and is used as a parking lot.. The property to the north is owned by a church and the rear portion is used as a parking lot. The property to the west is Zone R-2 and is used for residential purposes and the adjoining lot is headquarters for a transfer and storage company. Directly scross the street to the south, property is zoned 9.-2 and used for residentisl purposes. South east is the-parking lot for Shopping Bag Market. If the variance is grsnted ,the following conditions should apply: 1. Construct a 6 foot concrete block wall along the west property line, except t~at the front 25 feet should be 4 feet high. 2. Construct concrete curb, gutter snd sidewalk along the front of the subject property, including the 100.9 foot lot adjacent on the east, in accordance with City specification, and to grades satisfactory to the Director of Public Works. 3. Pave the property to be used ,for parking. 4. Submit grading plans to the Department of Public Works for approval as to grades. One communication had been received. This 'was from Mr. Freemsn Gates, 755 West Naomi Ave, immediately adjacent to the west. Mr. Gates stated that due, to the heavy traffic on Naomi Avenue, west of Baldwin Avenue, he requested that a masonry wall be constructed on the west side of the property under consideration; and that the wall be commenced a minimum of 20 feet ,north of Naomi Ave. or the first 20 feet being only 3 feet high so that sight clearance would be obtained in cOming out of his drivewsy into traffic. The Vice Chairman announced that, this was the time and place for the hearing on the application of Arcadia Parking, Inc., fora zone variance to allow automobile' parking at 745-751 W. Naomi Ave. AU those in favor of the application Were requested to come forward and present supporting material. Mr. Don Ehr, of Hinshaw's, represented Arcadia Parking, Inc. He stated there is a definite need for additional parking in this area. The areas north and east are in use as parking; the 'residence on the west is not in opposition but requests the wall to act as a buffer. The only problem, in his opinion, is the expense of curbs and gutters for this area. There are no cubs and gutters between Baldwin Avenue and Golden West Avenue. This street is extremely narrow and most of the people who park on the street actually are parking in the area reserved for sidewalks. He felt the construction of' curbs and gutters would reduce the street parking. He thought perhaps this' should be reserved until some future dste when widening of the street should be considered. The Director of Public Works stated Mr. Ehr's remarks were well taken however, a long range program should be considered. Ultimately curbs and gutters will be constructed in this area. The present policy of the city is to extend the pavement to the new curb at no expense to the property owner. The street is 50 and 55 feet. Probsbly 40 feet between curbs. There are curbs and gutters along the commercial portion of the property facing on Baldwin Ave. The street has two 12 foot travelling lanes and two 8 foot parking lanes, which is considered a standard street. Because of the pedestrian traffic in this area, a, sidewalk would be of tremendous value. The question of, "no parking" was discus,sed. It was determined thst this should be considered at a future time. July 11, 1961 Page Tw,o ZONE VARIANCE. 720~728 W.. Camino Real r' -, '--j The creation of additional parking lots would of necessity remove certain on_street parking. Mr.' Ehr preferred the "no parking" regulation be eliminated as there is need for all parking possible. This should not be done unless there are very substantial reasons. Commissioner Norton requested information ss to the parking spaces on the street -now. It was determined about 220 feet or approximately ten spaces would be on the street, and probably less because of the one driveway. The pedestrian traffic in this area is hesvy enough to warrant improvements and if the curb and gutter. as well as sidewalks, were installed a definite traffic hazard would be removed. Those opposed to the variance were requested to present information, and no one desired to be heard. Moved by Commissioner Norton, seconded by Commissioner Ferguson, and unanimously carried that the public hearing be closed. Discussion followed snd 1t was the opinion of the Commissioners that the request was compatible to needs in the ares; that the improvements as outlined by the Director of Public Works were an important safet~ factor. Mr. Ehr was asked whether or not it was the intention to plant trees in order to enhance the appearance of the srea. He stated there were seversl trees on the property and none would be removed except those which interferred with construction. Planting of new trees had not been considered at this time. A certain amount of landscaping has been used throughout former parking areas and no doubt would be used here. Moved by Commissioner Golisch, seconded by Commissioner Norton, that the application of Arcadia Parking, Inc. for a ~one variance to allow automobile parking at 745-751 W. Naomi Avenue be recommended for approval, subject to the conditions set forth in the Staff report. Said motion was carried on the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Ferguson, Forman, Golisch, Michler, Norton and Rutherford. NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Acker. 'The application of Paul M. spd Sierra-Camino Inc. for 720-728 W. Camino Real was and Ethel Porter, Charles F. and Mary Becker a zone variance to allow hotel residence at considered. The application states thst an exclusive hotel residence for retired persons is proposed. This will be limited to those that are healthy and ambulatory and will not include any narcotics, alcoholics or mentslly ill persons. A lounge and dining room will be provided and a landscaped garden which will include quiet recreational facilities for older adults, The present property is occupied by five houses all of which sre over ten years old; the property should be improved with structures more in keeping with the community. The adjacent properties to the east will be occupied by a service station and business buildings, and a convalescent home will be located to the ,south by reason of zone variances. ' It is felt the development of this property will be an asset to the community. A retirement hotel will be a good buffer between the commercial and the R-2 zone to the west. This is a planned program and is under the guidance of July 11, 1961 Page Three ! ~j ~ \ I Retirement Home Planners, Inc. and the architectural design is by Smith and Williams, Architects. Considerable research has been made which indicates that the highest and best use of the pr~perty is a hotel residence for retired persons. This project would be of considerable benefit to the City of Arcsdia and will complement and. support other facUities, including the Methodist Hospital, Medical Centers and Convalescent homes, and the adjacent shopping district which is within easy walking distance. It is felt this will not adversely aff"ct the comprehensive genersl plan in that no automobile traffic load will be added as a very small percentage of the, occupants will drive; no school load will be added; recreational fscilities will be, provided on the property and adjacent shopping area is mor.e than sdequate for the convenience of the occupants. The Planning Secretary read the staff report as follows: "This is the application of Paul M. and Ethel E. Porter., Chsrles F. and Mary Becker and Sierra-Camino, Inc. for a zone variance to allow a hotel residence for retired persons. The lot is 132 ft. by 300 ft, and contains 39,600 sq. ft. It is in Zone R-2 and is now developed with five dwellings. Property to the west and northwest is zoned R-2. Property north east is Zone R-3 and C-2. Property to the east is in Zone R-l but has comniercial uses by a variance granted by Resolution No. 3315. A service station is ,under construction at the corner of Camino Real and Baldwin Avenue and the balance of the property hss been cleared of buildings. Property to the south is in Zone a-I No. 3316 allows a convalescent home. done on this property. but a variance granted by ~esolution To date no physical work has been The plan for the subject property proposes the removal of all the existing improvements and the construction of the proposed hotel-residence. The kitchen, dining and lounge area is one story and contains about 3500 sq. ft. The balance of the building is two stories. In addition' to office space, a T.V. room, hobby room, and the director's apartment, provision is made for 9 suites, 25 semi-suites, and 10 single rooms. The two story portion of the building, contains about 17,660 sq. ft. of floor sres. The plot plan provides for a 20 foot driveway leading to a parking lot for 2S automobiles at the rear of the property. Five parking spaces are provided at the front for visitor parking. If the variance is granted consideration should be given to the following requirements. 1. Construct concrete curb, gutter snd sidewalk along the entire frontage of the property, in accordance with City specifications to grades satisfactory to the Director of Public Works. 2. Construct a 6 ft. high concrete block wall slong each side and the rear of the property unless it has otherwise been provided, except that said wall should be 4 feet high adjacent to the 25 foot ,front yard. July 11, 1961 Page Four '--~- , 3. The driveway and the entire parking lot should be paved, with I drainage facilities satisfactory to the Director of Public Works. The Planning Secretary exhibited an architectural rendering and plan submitted by the applicant and outlined the various use.s in the area. The Chairman announced that this was the time and place for the hearing on the application of Paul M. and Ethel Porter, Charles F. and Mary Becker and Sierra-Camino, Inc. for a zone variance to allow s hotel residence for retired persons at nO-n8W. Camino Real. Those in favor of the application were requested to present supporting material. Mr. Milton.Hadley, attorney representing the petitioners, stated this development is to be a high calibre type operation for the use of retired senior citizens. There were many people in the audience who were interested in this project among them being Mr. Otto Gruber,. Director of Home Planners, who has served as Executive Director of the Southern California Presbyterian Homes, who operates Royal Oaks Manor in Duarte. Other residences are the White Sands at La Jolla and one in Glendale. These programs do meet the needs and desires of the senior citizen. Mr. Gru,ber had also served as President of the Association of Homes for the dbad in Southern California, and was Chairman of the State of California Advisory Committee on Aging. He had worked closely in thep'reparation of the manual which is used by the Department of Social Welfare, and this year he was the official delegate from the State of California to the White House Conference meeting in Washington,D. C. Commissioner Norton inquired as to the needs of the community for this type of development. Mr. Gruber stated that through his associations and experiences he had found that senior citizens are just beginning to come into their own. They are a real asset to any community. Through- out the nation the general trend is to bring these people into a community where they can be a part of it and share in the real life of the community. La Jolla has several fine homes and they are a definite benefit. Royal Oaks Manor is another example of such a home. These homes are well ' located and will add much to the community. The question was also asked as to the rental to be charged for such a home. The development proposed is for the middle class of society who feel their dependence but need fellowship. There are those in the teaching profession, business people, etc, not indigent but who would be able to pay for their care. Medical care would be outside of the residence. The purpose of this type of residence would be for contacts and if. any emergency develops someone will call for assistance. There would be a director or ,manager on call 24 hours. This type would be licensed by the State Department of Welfare so this would take it out of the cold realm of a hotel as such. This type of development is carefully supervised by the State Department of Welfare. All medical would be the responsibility of the person living in the building. Mr. Gruber was further questioned as to whether or not they had applicants for residence in the hotel immediately upon its completion. He stated they had had calls from people who would like such arrangements, but specifically nothing had been signed up until it was determined that the building could be constructed. There were long waiting lists at the other hotels so constructed. The capacity would be approximately 65 to 80. All rooms would be of a size approved by the State Department of Welfare. This size building is adequate for successful operation from a monetary standpoint. It would not necessarily follow that more July 11, 1961 Page Five ZONE VARIANCE 920S. Second Avenue. , , , ~\ J r land would be required at a future date to expand the operation fr,om a financial standpoint. This is projected for a permanent type of residence: however, it i9 possible for an occupant to change from one locality to another, occupying approximately the same type of suit~, and at the same monthly rental. This is a monthly pay-as-you- go plan. '-.-......... Mr. Grti!>'er was asked what prerequIsite would be necessary for a person or a couple to occupy the property. There were basic fsctors: they must be capable of taking csre of themselves; must be over 65 years of age; and will be carefully screened and able financially to care forthe~elves. This will be a resident hotel and not for trsnsients. Mr. .Whitney Smith, one of the architects, was asked the size of the individual rooms, etc. He stated the single type room was the most common. There would be ten with individual baths; this would be the usual h9tel bedroom; and because of the need for companionship, the dining rOom and lounge would be used for entertainment, etc. The rooms on the second floor would be served by an elevator. There are three types of accommodations - the single room; the semi-suite, which is a larger room and has a divider with the bed being in a type of alcove; ,and the suite which would have a bedroom and a living room. This, could be used for two bedrooms if desired by the occupants. The single would be approximately 14' by 15'. The semi-suite would beabout 14' by 17'. The suite would be two rooms,each 11' by 12' or 14'. A projection had been made of the general range to make possible the loWest rate to be charged. This has to be done on a monthly basis where other homes have a lump sum price fixed. The charge projects the initial, capital cost plus the services. With the construction charges not fixed, it is difficult to determine but it would ra~ge from $275.00" to $300.00 per month, and up. This development 'would be under the State Department of Public Welfare. They approve it and license it. If it is approved there is an accepted plan of size and type of rooms. The driveway provided is 20 feet. This meets the requirement for the R-3 zone under the new ordinance. Those opposed to the variance were asked to state their views. Mr. Frank Kelly, 725 Callita Street stated he was opposed to the variance. Most of the area was R-l and there were new residences on Call ita Street and he felt the general area should be maintained as R-l. He felt this was not the proper area for a hotel and should not encroach on the area of residences. He was not opposed to the project itself, but to the area proposed. Inasmuch as this is the first proposal of this type and there is much to be studied, the Chairman suggested that the matter be referred to the Zoning Committee for further study. There may be conditions to be imposed in order to protect the community, if this variance were granted. Moved by Commissioner ~chler, seconded by CommiSSioner Golisch, and unanimously carried, that the matter of the variance for'the resident hotel as proposed, be referred to the Zoning Committee to report back to the Planning Commission at the next .regular meeting. The application of Dr.. C. M. and Helen M. Baxter for a zone variance to allow two duplexes and garages at 920 S. Semnd Avenue was considered. " The Planning Secretary exhibited a map of the area and explained the area and the alley to the north that is being improved at the present time. The application sets out the proposed use of having two duplexes on an July 11, 1961 Page Si,x ,~ undersized lot. This lot is 80 feet wide but only 108 feet deep, making it economically impractical to put but one duplex on it. There is adequate room for the two duplexes as shown on pictures which were displayed. These buildings are presently located in Arcadia on Foot- hillBoulevard on an almost identical lot. The buildings have been inspected and confrom to the Building Code. The property has been for sale for many months and interested parties were discouraged when it was learned but one duplex could be constructed on the lot without a variance. The property to the north is C zonej making it impractical to build expenaive two or three bedroom rentals. The duplexes would have one bedroom. The placement of the two duplexes on the property in place, of the existing building would be an asset to the area. There is a proposed parking lot to the rear of the property which would be enclosed with a solid masonry wall which is proposed to be built around the property. The dedicated alley to the north of the property is advantageous to the proposed use of the property and could not be adversely affected. This variance would solve the prob- lems of this parcel of land without need for a variance on other R-2 property, and without the problems found on this particular parcel. Normally, much land is required for driveways. This proposal makes good use of the dedicated alley and eliminates the need for other driveways. 'The area would be nicely landscaped. The applicant proposes to, use brick planters and to landscape the entire area, making it an asset.to the area. Enlarged photographs were sho~ of the duplexes on the property on Foothill Boulevard. The staff report was presented by the Planning Secretary as follows: '~his is the application 'of Dr. C. M. Baxter for a zone variance to allow two duplexes to be moved from 142-144-146- and 148 E. Foothill Boulevard to 920 S. Second Avenue. The lot is 80 feet by 108.46 feet containing 8676 square feet. It is in Zone R-2 which would normally allow one duplex. It now has a very old house and garage, as shown in the photographs submitted. The lot is located across an alley from Zone C~l. If it actually abutted the commercial property a three-family or four-family dwelling would be permitted under Section 9253.1.3 of the Zoning Ordinance. The plot plan as submitted shows a 23 foot front. yard as required by the Zoning Ordinance. This leaves a narrow driveway between the duplexes and the garages. No. front yard is required on the commercial property north of the alley. If this variance is granted, consideration should be given to some variance of the front yard to allow a more adequate driveway width. Discussion followed. If the front se,tback were modified there would be more area between the garages and the duplexes. This is now 9 feet wide but would be increased if the front setback were lessened. Directly across the street is another R-2 lot, but is being. used for R-l purposes. The surrounding area is R-l. There are signed consents from the immediate neighbors. The duplexes contain one bedroom each. The Chairman announced that this was the time and place for the hearing on the application of Dr. C. M. and Helen M. Baxter for a zone variance to allow two duplexes and garages at 920 S. Second Avenue, and requested those in favor to present their case. Dr. C. M. Baxter, owner of the subject property, stated that this July 11, 1961 Page Seven "'---', '~ I ,_/ '~-_/ had proven to be a problem. The building located on the property does not enhance the area; however, being an R-2 zone becomes a rental proper- ty and it is not feasible to remove the building and rebuilding just one duplex. The improvement as stated would be an asset to the area. The 20 foot alley is in the process of being improved and psved and would eliminate the necessity of having a driveway to the rear of the property. 'The owner to the south was .in agreement and had intended to be at tais meeting. He has signed for the variance. There is no opposition to his knowledge. It is l!is intention to nicely land- scape the area. He had options on the buildings and they are in the process of being moved from their present sites at this time, so thst 'any favorable action or any assistance would assist him in completing this project. Each of the buildings contain 1200 square feet - 600 per unit. The living room is 12' x 18' and the bedrooms are 12' X 12'; kitchen is 6' x 12" and the standard ,size bathroom. These, are modern buildings approximately is years, shingle roof, frame and stucco buildings. The Chairman requested those opposed to so state snd no one desired to be heard. Dis,cussion followed. The question was raised as to the proposed house moving ordinance and if these duplexes would meet the requirements of the proposed ordinance. The Planning Secretary stated that to his knowledge the buildings would meet the standards. Moved by Commissioner Norton" seconded by Commissioner Rutherford, and unanimously carried that the hearing be closed. Inasmuch as this property does abut, C-2 zoning the request is reason- able. CommissionerCNorton did desire to go on record that he would not want thiS to become infectiOUS as to the type of variance for the balance of, the area. The rest of the area is definitely R-l zoning. He favored the variance since it is in the R-2 category. It was agreed that with this ,property abutting the C-~it is a reasonable request. The Planning Secretary stated that the plot plan submitted with the application was the original drawing and was later taken out to have prints made. Thibr~ort was written without the plot plan, which shows 27 foot set/\n front, 23 is all that is required after the dedication for widening so that 4 feet can be added to the driveway without any variance. This would give plenty of driving area - 13 feet, and the new ordinance calls for 12-1/2 feet. Moved by Commissioner Norton, seconded by Commissioner Michler, that the application of Dr. C. M. and Helen M. Baxter for a zone variance to allow two duplexes and garages at 92b South Second Avenue be recommended. for approval. Said motion was carried on the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Ferguson, Forman, Golisch, Michler, Norton and Rutherford. NOJ!:S: None ABSENT: Commissioner Acker. VARIANCE EXTENSION (Margolin) The request of Nate ,Margolin for an extension of time of the zone variance at Santa Anita Avenue and Live ,Osk Avenue was reconsidered. The Secretary stated he had no new material to present but the matter July 11, 1961 Page Eight ) had been continued from the last Planning Commission meeting. Mr. Phillip M. Newman, attorney for Mr. Margolin, was present. He stated that the conference held with the City Attorney had reached a tentative agreement for the meeting of pos~ible objections of the Commission. The letter from Mr. Margolin as read into the record stated certain proposed arrangements for the..completion of the project. He read a letter from Miles C. Babcock, Real Estate Financing, 350 North Bedford Drive, Beverly Hills, California, dated July 7, 1961, and addressed to Mr. Nate Margolin, 338 N. Rodeo Drive, Beverly Hills, CalifornIa, relative to the South Arcadia Shopping Center, Arcadia, which stated that pertaining to the discussion held yesterday (July 6, 1961) they had a lender that had examined the loan applicstion and is interested on the basis of the following terms: The amount The interest ,Terms $1,200,000.00 6'7. 20 years The lender had been given a full set of details and the progress, and had also made an inspection of the property. They'would recommend the loan immediately to ,the final loan committee. They knew the company rather well and would expect the commitment to be forthcoming within ten days. Mr,. Ne~an stated that since the letter was written the principal has been disclosed. It is the Lincoln National Life Insurance Co. With reference to the second problem, that is, to what guarantee the City would have that the project would be completed withi!l the specified time,he stated that there is now a mQre workable solution and that meeting with representatives of a bond company he had ascer~ained that a surety bond ~ould be procured indemnifying the City of Arcadia at the rate of $100.00 per day for each working day beyond the stip~lated date in the letter. He stated he desired to submit that the financial arrangements are under way which should be completed within ten days and they would be in a position to post a bond. The City Attorney stated that at the last meeting the Commission approved the substance of the letter of Mr. Margolin with the exception of the security that was to be provided for the indemnity agreement; that was refBrred back to the Attorney for further negotiations. At the prelimioary dicusssions Mr. Margolin was unable to state that it was possible to get a bond. A surety bond would be preferable to' other proposals. This would be forthcoming in the event it was necessary to use it. Mr. Newman also desired to state that the General Contractor would also have a bond for faithful performance of his con- tract. ' Discussion followed., Commissioner Norton requested information as to the expected ten days for determination of the loan. Mr. Newman stated the assumption was that the ten day period was from ttie date of the letter. The work would commence immediately follOWing the commitment providing everything is clear with the California Bank who has the present loan. There would be some processing to be done by them. The appraisal and-all normal checking has been completed. There is no way of knowing whether there would be a day or two days or a week before work could commence. He would have no way of knowing this. Commissioner Norton stated that it would be with the full understanding that everything would be completed so far as plans and the design,work and that Mr. Margolin would be prepared to commence where he left off. July 11, 1961 Page Nine \ .....J Mr. Margolin stated everything was completed with the exception of a few structural changes which have been held in abeyance. This will be resubmitted to the City for a final check. The parking outlined will remain. Mr. Margolin had an outline of the proposal to the Lincoln National Life Insurance Co. and many times the outline and the actual commitment could differ. There may be a difference with the interim lender. He would have no way of knowing this at this time. There were no obstacles so far as he knew. The Chairman requested the pleasure of the Commission as to the deter- minationof the matter. The City Attorney advised that the former minutes reflected the approval of the proposal made by the property owner with the exception of the security afforded. A corporate surety bond could be accepted as the type of indemnity bond. Commissioner Norton stated that in keeping with the City Attorney's remarks the surety bond is s satisfactory type to indemnify the City in case the project is not completed, he would move that the surety bond be accepted as the media of security for the completion of the project. Said motion was seconded by Commissioner Ferguson and unanimously carried. Commissioner Golisch stated that in the minutes of June 13, there is an indication that an application with Frank and Co. for a permanent mortgage was in process and there were no unusual circumstances surround- ing this and that as soon as the completion of the processing, they would be in a position to issue the usual commitment. On June 27, it was indicated certain problems had arisen again with the Mutual Life Insurance Co. ,and'now there is another agency being brought into the picture. Each time with a statement that it would be concluded within a few days. He would not vote for an extension unless the absolute commitment for financing is before the commission. The City Attorney stated that this probably was not the time to consider the extension on the variance for a number of reasons: Work will not stsrt immeidately without the issuance of the title policy alone; there is the working out of the final commitment by the Lincoln National Life Insurance Co., and the acceptance of the commitment by the California Bank. Furthermore, there is the preparation of the formal indemnity agreement which has not been prepared and which is the basis of the extension. The conditions have been approved but the agreement should be drawn, approved and executed and the bond procured. This could be tendered at the same time that they tender the information on the loan commitment and then it would be ready for action. If the formal approval of the extension were deferred until the next meeting, Mr. Margolin should be in a position by that time to advise of the actual commitment. This still would not delay them any because there is still some excavation work to be completed. CommiSSioner Norton wanted to go on record as stating the Commission was working in the interes'ts of both the City of Arcadia its well as with Mr. Margolin. The CommiSSion is interested in the successful completion of this project. The letter presented would indicate a valid intention. Each of the Commissioners expressed himself. It was the consensus of opinion that the extension should be contigent upon the dates of com- pletion so that ~r. Margolin would be within the time allocated. It was hoped that the present lender could see fit to carry through the commit- me'!t. June 11, 1961 Page Ten ANNEXATION "), .. The' City Attorney stated he felt the feeling of the Commission is that sooner or later a point would be reached as to whether the extension would be granted or would not, without reference to the completion date. It was agreed that each one wanted to see the project completed, and with a project as large as this there is time involved. The City Attorney further stated the time is about here when the Commission will state the request is denied and the variance is thereby terminated by operation of law. It would seem more than appropriate to spread on. the minutes at some stage of the procedure,a declaration of intent that if the matter is not culminated within two weeks, or a time fixed by the Commission, no further extension of time on the request for the extension on the variance will be allowed. This would serve as advance warning to the applicant that :he" must move, regardless of the obstacles, and that the matter willgo ahead, even though it means going back to the original zoning. Commissioner Norton moved that the matter of the decision be held over until the next regular meeting. The commitment, as stated by Mr. Newman, should be due ten days from the date of the letter received by Mr. Margolin, which was July 7th, and that at the meeting of July 25, which would allow more than the ten days anticipated, final decision would be made. Said motion was seconded by Commissioner Golisch and unanimously carried. The report on the proposed annexation north of Camino Real and west of Mayflower Avenue was considered. The Planning Secretary presented a report 'from the Police DepaJ:'tment to the effect that the area is composed of approximately 20 parcels and an approximate population of 60 plus persons; the area is bounded on the east by Mayflower Avenue which at this particular location is a county controlled and maintained street. Camino Real on the south is likewise a county controlled and maintained street. This means that persons living in the area must enter from streets not within the City of Arcadia. Traffic accidents and other incidents on the street would be investigated and handled by the Los Angeles County Sheriff's office. Ingress and egress into the area would be on Shrode Street which is sub-standard as to width insofar as the standard of Arcadia is concerned. Atcompletion, the street would be 26 feet curb to curb, instead of 36 feet which is the city standard. The Police Department could not anticipate or for see any appreciable increase of the department's work load or additional patrol problems if this property is annexed. The sub-standard width of Shrode Street would make it rather difficul to pass csrs proceeding in the opposite direction, particularly if automobiles are parked at the curb on either or both sides. There would be no need to actually patrol Shr.ode Street ss there is sight view to the end ,of the street from vehicles using Msyflower Avenue. The report from the Fire Department stated thst so far as that Depsrtment is concerned this area does not seem to create any problems. They had checked with the water company t hi! t :4erves that location and there is adequate water to give the required fire protection. With the comple- tion of Shrode Street, there will also be an additional hydrant to serve the annexed property. A further report was received 'from the Director of Public Works to the effect that the streets in and near the proposed annexation were field checked. They appear from surface examination to be improved to Los July 11, -1961 Page Eleven AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION COUNCIL LIAISON "~ ,_/ Angeles County Road Department standards. Altern Street has curb and gutter at a36 foot width and has asphaltic pavement. Shrode Street, (new street) is being improved in conjunction with the development of the new tract west of Mayflower Avenue. This is a cui de sac with 40 foot right of way and, 26 feet curb to curb. The improvement will be curb, 2' gutter, 1 cross gutter snd 2" pavement on 4" base. Camino Real and Mayflower Avenue do not have curb and gutter at present. They have an 80 foot right of way with 56 feet of pavement with rolled asphalt gutters. There are very few street lights in the area. could be mounted on existing wood poles. The maintained up to this time. Additional lights streets have been well Photographs were presented showing the area requested to be annexed. Discussion followed. Mr. Bauman, subdivider of the Shrode Street tract, was present and answered questions relative to the lot size, street widths, etc. A report from the Planning Commission to the Regional Planning Commission at the time of the de annexation was referred to as showing the lots did not meet Arcadia standards. The City Attorney stated that if the annexation were to be processed it would be done under the Annexation Act of 1913, inhabited. It is required that the matter be referred to the Planning Commission before Council action. Mr. Bauman stated the annexation subdivision included but 6 lots. given the entire area. was for 20 properties and the new He felt that consideration should be ,Moved by Commissioner Rutherford, seconded by Commissioner Golisch, that the annexation of the property north of Camino Real and west of Mayflower be recommended for denial inasmuch as the lots do not conform to the standards of the City of Arcadia, nor are the widths of the street constructed to city standards. Said motion was carried on the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Ferguson, Forman, Golisch, Michler, Norton and Rutherford. NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Acker. There was no audience participation. Commissioner Goliseh reported that the Council is anxious to have work done on the House Moving Ordinance. 'Because 'of the lack of personnel in the Planning Department-this has been held up, but some recommendation should be given at an early date. The question of Naomi Avenue rezoning had been discussed. It was the opinion that the zone change should be denied ,not from the standpoint of being denied, but that consideration should be given the entire area. The Manager had presented a report which in essence was an approval for the zone change with Zone D regulations, such as dedication of certain July 11, 1961 Page Twelve , ANNEXATION McBane WEST ARCADIA HCIlE OWNERS ASSOCIATION RESOLUTION NO. 414 - areas, landscaping, restrictions as to signs and all plans to be approved by the Planning Commission. It would still represent a zone change just for the six lots. A further matter had come before the Council, that is, the classification of business for Mr. Lynch which had been previously considered by the COlIDIIiasion. The, CouncH felt there should be a review of the ordinance insofar as definitions are concerned, especially as to wholesale and retail, etc. At the last meeting the lot at 1167 W.Duarte Road was recommended to the City Council for annexation, and that prime facie it should be R-3 because everything east of this lot is R-3 in the City of Arcadia. This recOllDllendation went to the Council and if the Council looked with favor proceeding further with the annexation they would then take the necessary steps to so advise the COlIDIIission and a formal hearing would be held on the zoning. They have now advised the staff to proceed further with it so it is appropriate to fix a hearing date. It was determined that August 8, 1961 should be fixed as the date for public hearing on the zoning for the lot located at 1167 W. Duarte Road. The Planning Secretary read a letter from the West Arcadia Home Owners Association, directed to Mr. Acker, stating that it has come to the attention of the Associaticnby the minutes of the Arcadia Planning COlIDIIission and the City Cou"cil that the area affected by Ordinance 1071, in part or in whole is again under consideration by the city body. SOme- time' ago the Planning COlIDIIission extended representatives of the West Arcadia Home Owners Association the courtesy to be at a special meeting at which time the view of the members could be stated in regard to the six lots in the area that was then in the process of rezoning. This meeting was an informal and amiable discussion of ideas for some solution to this controversial area from both the residential area and cOllDllercial points of view. It is the hope of this organization that if any future discussions regarding this particular area are held that this group be notified so that there may be representation at the meeting. They requested advice by letter if this courtesy could be extended. The City Attorney stated in this connection information will be coming relative to a bill passed by the last legislature by amending the Brown Act, which wfllinclude all boards and cOllDllissions. The Act will not become effective until SepteritJer 15, 1961, but when signed by the Governor it will apply to this COlIDIIission. Information will be forwarded to the COlIDIIission by the Attorney when this becomes effective. While it was not a legal problem in the past, it could well become one in the future. The Secretary was instructed to answer' the letter by stating the matter had been acted upon by the Planning COlIDIIission and that it is now before the City Council. The City Attorney presented Resolution No. 414 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THE GRANTING OF A ZONE VARIANCE TO PERMIT ,THE ERECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF TWO DUPLEXES AND GARAGES ON THE PROPERTY SITUATED AT 920 SOUTH SECOND AVENUE. Moved'by COlIDIIissioner Ferguson, seconded by COlIDIIissionerMichler, and unanimously carried that the reading of the full body of Resolution No. 414 be waived. July 11, 1961 Page Thirteen ELECTION OF CHAIRMAN -j ""'/. Moved by Commissioner Ferguson, se~onded by Commissioner Norton that Resolution No. 414 be adopted. Said motion was carried on the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Ferguson, Forman, Golisch, Michler Norton and Rutherford. NOES: None ABSENT: Commis,sioner Acker. The Planning Secretary stated. that according to the Code it is necessary as soon as ,practical after July 1st to elect a chairman and vice- chairman. This is sometimes done by ballot and sometimes by motion. Moved by Commissioner Michler, seconded by Commissioner Rutherford that George Forman be nominated for Chairman:- ~'_J ~ , ~ COmmissioner Golisch nominated Ralph Norton. Motion was made and carried to close the nominations. Ballots were prepared and the vote there were three for Commissioner Norton. arrived home and had not the meeting. The matter distributed to each member. Upon polling votes for Commissioner Forman and three votes Commissioner Acker was contacted but had just yet had dinner. He did not wish to come to was continued until the next regular meeting. There being no further business to come before the Commission the meeting adjourned at 10: 30 P'.M. ;f?)w.~ d " , ./ L. M. TAL~:~ Planning Secretary