HomeMy WebLinkAboutOCTOBER 30, 1962
-
..'
t ......; ,
PLEDGE OF
ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
MINUTES
TRACT NO.
21997
.
.
MINUTU
PLANNING COMMISSION, ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA
Adjourned Regular Meeting
October~, 1962
The Planning Commission of the City of Arcadio, C...lifornia, met in adjourned
regular session, October 30, 1962, at 8:00 o'clock P.M., in the City Council
Chamber, City Hall, with Chairman Forman presiding.
Commissioner James Parker led in the pledge of allegiance.
PRESENT: Commissioners Ferguson, Forman, Golisch, Kuyper, Norian
and Parker
ABSENT: Commissioner Michler
OTHERS PRESENT: Asst. City Engineer Fran~ Forbes
Planning Technician Ernest Mayer, Jr.
Planning Director William Phelps
The minutes of the meetings of October 9th ;and October 23rd were approved as
written and moiled.
The final map of Tract No. 21997, located approximately 246 ft. north of Camino
Real on the east side of Fourth Avenue was considered. A public hearing on this
tract to consider a trust on the easterly 75 ft. of the large parcel located on the
southeast corner which is not a part of this tract was held.
STAFF REPORT
"The subject tract is located on the .east side of Fourth Avenue, about 246 ft.-
north of Camino Real. It contains an area of about 2-1/2 acres which is to be
divided into six single-family lots.
Tne one large parcel at the southeast corner is not a part of this tract. A notice
of the public hearing has been sent to the property owner advising him that the
subdivider proposes to place a trust on the easterly 75 ft. of this parcel to spread
the appl icable improvement cost.
The Planning Department recommends that this tract be approved subject to the
following conditions:
I. Remove all trees from the street righ.t of way
2. Install all standard street improvements required by the subdivision
ordinance. Improvements, grading, grades and drainage
shall be to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Wor,(s
3. Provide all necessary rear line overhead utility easements
4. Dedicate 15 Ft. corner cutoff at Fourth Avenue
5. Remove all structures within and/or across the tract boundary. The
wor., shall be done in compliance with the Uniform Building
Code.
October 30, 1962
Page One
,
.
.
6. The following fees will be required:
Street tree installations
Street I ightinstallations
Street name sign installations
Six lots recreation fee
@ $25.00
$110.00
230.00
70.00
150.00
Total
$ 560.50
7. A covenant in 0 form approved by the City Attorney shall
be recorded agreeing that for the purposes of Article
IX of the Arcadia Municipal Code the exterior boundary
of soid tract shall constitute the rear lot I ine of lots
4 and 5
8. Authorize the subdivider to establish a trust in accordance with
City Council Resolution No. .2512 for a distance of 75 ft.
from the west line of lot No.6 for the amount of $2,840.32
Commissioner Norton,stated this is a final map and it conforms with the
tentative map which has been approved. He stated this again was a cul-de-sac
approach to the development ci the City and it i.s not completely compatible
with the development concepts for the remaining portions of land that exists
in the City of Arcadia. He felt the Commission had not had the full opportunity
to evaluate this type of development; also with this type of development the
City would end up with less than the desired type of development. He did not
refer to the type of homes, etc. bu t the amount of space limited to the home
and he felt immediate action,should be taken towards the total overall picture
and the ultimate effect of this type of development. He did not have specif ic
reference to the tract being considered but he felt there would be a continuous
invasion of this type of development. He wanted to go on record at least of
placing a "quarantine" on this type of development because it is becoming
infectuous and there has not been an opportunity to stop it before it invades
the city.
MOTION
Moved by Commissioner Ferguson, seconded by Commissioner Golisch that
the final map of Tract No. 21997 located north of Camino Real and east of
Fourth Avenue be recommended for approval.
Roll call on the motion was withheld until after the publ ic hearing on the
trust was held.
PUBLIC
HEARING
The Chairman announced this was the .:time for the hearing on the trust in
connection with Tract No. 21997, on the easterly 75 feet of the property
west of lot 6.
The Trust calculations were presented and amounted to $2,840.32.
PROPONENT
Mr. Hans Wilmsen, 1525 South Fourth Ave. stated he was not opposed to the
trust but asked if the trust ran for the period of 20 years as he had understood,
could the property "then be split -,and have the use of the new street if the
,property owner so des ired.
October 30, 1962
Page Two
HEARING
CLOSED
ROLL CALL
FINAL MAP
TRACT NO.
22199
.
.
This question was answered by the Assistan't City Engineer to the effect
that the trust did run only for 20 years, aft~r that time the City had title to
the one foot strip and the property owner could apply far a lot split facing
the new street without beil)g requir~c! to participate in the trust.
OPPONENTS
No one desired to be heard.
Moved by Commissioner Norton, seconded by Commissioner Golisch ond
unanimously carried that .the public hearing on the trust be closed.
. The roll call was then token on the original motion approving the finol map
of Tract No. 2/997:
AYES: Commissioners Ferguson, Forman" Golisqij" Norton and
ParKer
; NOES': None
ABSTAINED: Commissioner Kuyper
ABSENT: Cammission.er Michler
Final map of Tract No. 22199, located on. the east side of First Avenue about
884 ft. north of Camino Real was considered.
STAFF REPORT
"The subject tract is located on the east side of First Avenue about 884 feet
north of Camino Real, opposite the Dana School. It consists of two properties
i<nown os 1406 and 1332 S. First Avenue. It contains 1.8 acres divided into
8 single-family lots.
This tract substantially compl,ies with the approved tentative map and is
recommended for approval to the Planning Commission, subject to the following
conditions:
I. Remove all buildings and structures within the tract boun~ary
or, if any are to remain, they shall comply with all
building code and yard requirements in all respects.
All building removals and relocations shall be complete
prior to ,the signing of the finol map.
2. Remove all trees from the street righ t of way
3. Provide all necessary rear line utility easements,
4. Install all standard street improvements required by the subdivision
ordinance. Improvements, grading, grades and drainage
shall be to the satisfaction of the Director of Publ.ic Works.
Minimum grade of 0.4% will be. required.
October 30, 1962
Page Three
. .
5. Pay the fallowing fees:
Installation of street trees $ 76.50
Installation of street name signs 70.00
Installation of steel street light
poles 230.00
8 lots recreation fee @ $25.00 200.00
TOTAL $ 576.50
6. A covenant in a form approved by the City Attorney shall be recorded
agreeing that for the purposes of Articll! IX of the Arcadia MunIcipal Code
the exterior boundary I ine of said tract shall constitute the rear lot I ines of
lots 3 to 6 inclusive.
Commissioner Norton requested information as to how this subdivision would
affect the overall land remaining on First Avenue. He was interested in what
is going to happen with the balance of the street.
The Planning Director advised that between First and Second Avenues a new
street has already been developed - Greenfield Avenue. With these proper-
ties being developed to a minimum depth of 125 ft. it left considerable depth
on the properties facing First Avenue, in this case 321 ft. This is not suffi-
cient to run another street so if this land is ever to develop the cul-de-sac
method as a design technique will have to be used. This area was two
properties and contained two old single-family residences with the rear
portions completely undeveloped. There will be eight new homes with an
approximate value of $35,000 each. He felt that ,the balance of the street
would be developed in this manner. The policy has been to remove the old
structures and develop new homes.
, Commissioner Gol.isch felt this was more desirable than developing with
multipleoni,ts. He felt thot if the land is not developed in this manner the
ultimate would be a change of zone to multiple use.
Commissioner Norton:statedthe acceptance of such a tract is being made
without a complete look at the entire block and its future development. Some
of the property owners,may be precluded forever from utilizing their property.
Chairman Forman stated that with Greenfield Avenue having been developed
with new homes it would be impossible to cut the street tlirough which would
be the desired plan. However, it would be impossible to remove or relocate
one of the expensive residences on Greenfield Avenue in order to accompl ish
this. If there was an old house on Greenfield Avenue then the street should
go through.
The Planning Director stated that the Department, Developer, and the
Commission is bound by the Subdivision Ordinance in that property can be
developed providing it meets certain standards. If there are any deviations
from these standards they are made by the Planning Commission with final
action by the City Council.
The Chairman, stated that Commissioner Norton had been appointed to the
Subdivision.Committee purposely to see if there is some manner in which
orderly development can take place without the extreme use of cul-de-sacs.
October 30, 1962
Page Four
,
.
.
MOT.lON
Moved by Commissioner Ferguson, seconded by Commissioner Gol.isch that the
final tract map of Trac,t No. 22199, located on the east side of first Avenue
about 884 ft. north of Camino Real be recommended for approval, subject to
the recommendations in, the Staff r~ort.
ROLLCALL:
AYES: Commissioners Ferguson, Forman, Golisch and Parker
NOES: Commissioner Norton
.ABSTAINED: Commissioner Kuyper
ABSENT: Commission~r Michler
TgACT NO.
27403
final map of Tract No. 27~3 - Santa.A,nita Terrace, connecting the two portions
now already develapEld w~st of Santa Anita Avenue.
STAFF REPORT:
This tract is located on Santa Anita Terrace west of S!lnt.aJ~nita Avenue and
contains 8 lots. It will connect !.he two presElnt dead ends of this street.
The tract complies substantially with the approved tentative and is recommended
for approval subject to the fo II ow if!9. .conditions:
I. Provide all necessary rear line overhead utility easements
2. InstalJ all standard street improvements required by the Subdivision
. Ordinance. Improvements, grading, grades and drainage
shallbeto the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
Minimum grade of 0.4% will be required. The structure
.across the channel shall be constructed full street right of
way widths.
3. Remove all trees from the street right of way
4. Relocate the garage. from lot 8 to serve the dwelling at 123 W.
Camino Real
5. All structures' within, tract boundary shall be removed or remodeled
to meet Municipal Code' requirements
6. Pay the following fees:
Street tree installation $ 153.00
Street I ight installation 230.00
8 lots recreation fee $25.00 200.00
Total $ 583.00
7. Upon completion of improvements to the approval of the Director
of Public Works, the City shall pay to the developer the
deposit for bridge construction under Tract No. 25803
(wester! y of th is tract).
8. The City shall dedicate Lot 17, Tract No. 25803 and Lot II, Tract
, No. 21215 for street purposes.
9. Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the title sheet of the
final map as an owner. ,(This is required to provide street
right of way across the drainage channel.)
October 30, 1962
Page Five
MOTION,
REVIEW OF PLANS
. (Mote I "6")
.
.
Moved !;.y Commissioner Norton, seconded by' Commissioner Ferguson
and unanimously carried that the final map of Tract No. 27403 be
recommended for approval" subject to the conditions aut'ined in the
staff report.
A large delegation was in the audience who were interested in this
matter. The Chairman stated that this was not a public hearing, but
only a revieYl of plans that had been submitted after a request by the
applicant to the City Council had been made.
I'f any new information is to be presented the Chairman ,-,!,ould call for itr
and have it read into the records. The City Council had set th is matter
for publ ic hearing on .Nov~mber 7, 1962.
A communication had been received from the delegation representing
the Santa Anita Church of Rei igipus Science which was read into the
record:
"It is our understanding that developers are building a motel on the
property on the two acres adjoining the southern boundaries of our present
church property and th is matter is coming up far consideration on Tuesday,
October 3Qth. In a letter to you dated July 22, 1962, we stated thaI
the Church was desirous of negot.iating with regards to the purchase of
this property. At this ,timlil we wish to make a firm statement that we are
now able to purchase this property from the owners,. We have written a
letter so advising them.
Thank you for your consider,ation of th is letter."
Mr. Mayer presented Plan.'C" and read the staff report.
STAFF REPORT
On October 16, 1962, the Arcadia City Council entertained a request
by the Motel "6" applicants for a reconsideration of the variance appli-
cation an. the basis of newly submitted plot plans which indicate a consider-
able reduction in th.e total number of room 'units proposed.
The City Counci I after careful consideration decided to defer action in
, order thatthe Planning Commission be given an opportunity to study the new
proposal and arrive at a definite recommendation.
The application along with the Planning Commissia~I$,/recommendation is
scheduled for a public hearing before.the City Council on November 7,1962.
Motel "6" as it.is now proposed and shown on Plan C represents a reduction
, in, the total number of room units from the 122 originally proposed by the
applicants C!nd considlilred by the Planning Commission to the 88 now
prol?osed.~.!his.is roughly a 30% decrease and changes the density from
49 d- units per ai:re to 34t units per acre.
The Planning Department continues to consider the use of the subject
property for motel purAoses appropriate and bel ieves Pla,n C to be an
improvement over the previously 'submitted plans in the sense that they
October 30, 1962
PageS ix
.
.
not only show a density decrease but also a compliance with many of the
recommended conditions of approval as set forth in the July 5, 1962,
Planning Department R.eport. .
If the Commission.decides to recommend to .the City Council that this
variance be approved the following conditions should be made a part
of that recommenda,tjon:
1. The variance not to be operative until cOl1:lplete plot
plans, building plans, and elevations h9ve been submitted
. to.and approved by the Planning Cammission, which shall
be within,one year from the date of tentativ~ approval of
the project by the City Council. S,ite work shall not be
done until a building permit far the erection of the motel
has been issued. Such building permit shall not be issued
until the plans have been approved by all interested City,
County and State Departments.
2. That grading and drainage plans be submitted and
approved by the Department of Public Works prior to
the issuance of a building permit.
3. That water services shall meet with the standards
set up in t~e U~ifor!'1 Plumbing Code.
4. That all parking lot illumination and building
illumination'sf)all be scheduled and directed away from
the adjoininll properties and shall meet with the approval
of the Dep'artmerit of Publ ic Works.
5. The Planning Commission may grant minor modificati ons"
without further public headngs or notice therof, of the condi-
tions set out above to the extent neces~ry,:, to accompl ish
the purpose of. this variance,.
6. .Install an~ .COI1i truct curb, gutter; street I ights and
. sidewalks to the specifications and. standards to meet the
approval: of the Department of Publ ic Works and the State
Division of Highways.
7. . Relocate the sewer I ine and grant nece~ary easements
to the approva.' of the Department of Public Works.
8. .Final plans and working drawings shall be in sub-
stantial compliance with Plan C.
This plan had eliminated one of .the buildings and hove substituted plant
material,landscaping and eliminated some parking spaces whiFh were
a little tight. There is a proposed lobby and Manager's living quarters.
.It also proposes a recreation' room and a mail's room. Many of the
conditions of approval have been complied with, such as the planting
along the flood control channel, elimination of parking spaces which
were difficul t to negotiate and a decrease in the number of units.
October 30, 1962
Page Seven
.
.
: Commissioner Parker asked as to the density factor. This calls for 34 units
per acre.
, Some approximate figur~s :-vere given as follows:
: Westerner - 29 units per acre;
Santa Anit,a Motel - 15 units per acre;
Round-yp - 5+ units per acre;
Huntington - 5+ units per acre;
Frontier - 12.6 units per acre;
Flamingo - 21.5 units per acrej
Eaton's -19,+ units per acre.
13.2+ units per acre.is the approximate q...erall kverage for all motels
in Arcadia. The fire zone was discussed. This',is an R-3areo with a C-2
use so ,that the fire zone would remain unchanged. Commercial zoned
property is Na, I fire zone. The Planning Director stated in some instances
the fire zone had been waived in commercially zoned property.
Commissioner Ferguson, stated the cO"1patible use of the property was his
concern and this use ,inimilar to athers.in the area.
Commissioner Parker stated it was a reasonable use and appropriate in the
area and ,is in line with'!he development. The density is a l.ittle heavy but
.is much 'improved over t~e ~!her plan.
Commissioner Golisch felt from a planning standpoinnhe consensus of
opinion was that the use was cOII)Pa,tjble and th is was the measure the
Commission had to use, he :felt it was acceptable.
Mr.,Jack E. Wells, member of the Board of Trustees for the church,
stated they were ,ready financially to purchase the land. They had no
commi,tments, but if it were made availoble to them they could purchase
.it. He stated the Church was preporing in January to build a Fellowship
Hall and additional room is needed. He felt that if they were not allowed
to avail themselves of more property in some measure thistduld jeopardize
,their own investment. He felt they had made a contribution to the area,
and they had a fully accredited parochial day school from 1st to 8th grades
and plans were being ma~e to build additional school facilities.
Mr. Roger De Young, Los Angeles, felt it was unfair of the church to
"sabotage his deal". He felt the letter should not have been allowed to
be submitted., Whether this is planning or not he.is bo~nd to a deal.
The property ,is under option.
The Chairman: stated whether or not from a legal standpoint the letter
should have been read he was not prepared to say, but he desired to
present all of ,the information possible and give everyone a chance to
present any ev idence necessary.
Mr. De Young stated he had no offer from the Church. There were meet-
ings over a year ago and no agreement had been reached.
I
, Commissioner Norton stated ,that they had reviewed the entire matter and
he had had an opportunity to observe the workings of this particular
company and he felt the plan, before the Commission is a better plan and
had rei ieved ,the density factor. It is compatible and .it is unfortunate
there is controversy between the property owner and .the church. The
Qctober 30, 1962
,Page Eight
.
.
Commission has demonstrated its desire to work with any religious
organizatio,n. He felt their request is too late and should have no bear-
ing at this pnrticular date.
MOTION
Moved by Commission,er Norton, seconded by Commissioner Golisch,
that the application far a variance No. 62-10, for ~motel to be con-
structed at 225 Colorado Place, subject to the conditions specified in
the staff report be recommended for approval.
ROLL CALL:
AYES: Commissioner Ferguson, Forman, Golisch, Kuyper
and Norton
NOES: Commissioner Parker
A,BSENT: Commissioner Michler
RESOLUTION
NO. 461
The Planning Director presented Resolution No. 461, entitled:
"I>. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING THE
REQUEST'FOR MODIFICATION OF THE SIDE YARD SET-
BACK REQUIREMENTS AND ACCESSORY BUILDING
REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO REAL PROPERTY LOCATED
AT 331 MONTE VISTA ROAD IN SAID CITY."
MOTION
Moved by Commissioner Ferguson, seconded by Commissioner Norton,
and unanimously carried that the reading of the full body be waived.
'ADOPTION
Moved by Commissioner Norton, seconded by Commissioner Ferguson,
that Resolution' No. 461 be adopted.
AYES: Commissioners Ferguson, Forman, Golisch, Kuyper,
Parker and Norton
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Michler
RESOLUTION
NO. 462
The Planning Director presented Resolution, No. 462, entitled:
"A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMEND-
ING THE DENIAL OF A ZONE VARIANCE TO ALLOW A
SECOND SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING ON THE LOT AT
315 LE ROY AVENUE IN SAID CITY".
MOTION
Moved by Commissioner Golisch, seconded by Commissioner Parker
and unanimously carried that the reading of the full body be waived.
ADOPTION
Moved by Commissioner Golisch, seconded by Commissioner Kuyper
that Resolution No. 462 be adopted.
October 30, 1962
Page Nine
.
.
ROLl' CALL
AYES:
Commissioners Ferguson,. Forman, Gal.isch,
Kuyper, Norton and Parker
None
. Commissioner Michler
NOES:
ABSENT:
AUDIENCE
PARTlC IPA TI ON
No one in the audience desired to be heard.
REPORTS
The Planning Director statec:l that a draft of the proposed standards for
nursery schools had been forwarded to each Commissioner with a re-
quest for comments on the study from the Comm ission.
The draft was reviewed and pertinent information was disC;,lJssed so that
the Planning Director cau Id prepare a repart for subm ission at the
November 13 meeting. Several matters had been discussed with the
State and County officials and a few matters were still being determined.
Solid fencing was one consideration. The zoning was also considered.
Meetings were announced as fallows:
West San Gabriel Valley Planning Congress - Woody and Eddy's
Friday, .November 9, 1,962, at noon
Downtown Area - November 6, 1962 at 10 A. M. Conference Room
City Hall
The first meeting of the Planning. Commission in December the con-
sultants wi II present detailed report of the Downtown studies as of
that time. Time will be reserved on the agenda for this matter.
Southern: California Planning Congress on Thursday November 8,
Country Club in Camarillo, with the subject being:
"Better Builders are Planners".
TECHNICAL
COMMITTEE
(R-3)
The Chairman. stated that the City Council had appointed a technical
group to study construction of apartment buildings in the City of
Arcadia. He advised that Kermit Ferguson had been appointed Chair-
man .of the group and asked for a report at th is time.
Mr.. Ferguson ,stated that one meeting had been held wherein procedures
had been, discussed and an organization. set up. Their study was to be
made in connection with the type of construction, so that any future
buildings constructed will have more quality.
The Commission was of the opinion that inasmuch os this study is under
way and the Zoning Committee ,is studying the upgrading af the R-3
areas, that it would be in order to hove the Planning Director check
with the City Attorney as to the legality of imposing a "freeze" on
,R-3 development until such time as the two committees hove made a
October 30, 1962
Page Ten
. ,
.
.
.
study and prepared recommendations. The technical committee's
recom!)1l!!ndati,on$ w.ould be made to the City Council and if it
requires action of the Planning Commission, it would be 'referred;
fQltha:Planriing Commission then.
.ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 10:45 P. M.
d/~~
WILLIAM PHELPS
, Planning Secretary
October 30, 1962
,Page Eleven