Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout0019 , . . . . RESOLUTION NO. 19. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLAln1ING CO!illuISSION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORlHA, REQ01IMEIID- ING THE DENIAL OF A PETITION FOR THE RB-ZONING OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, LOCATED AT 322- H~l~I~GTON P~_CE, IN SAID CITY. THE CITY PLAN1UNG COJ.'J'iJISSION OF Tllli CITY OF ARCADIA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: VlliEREAS, on the 4th of November, 1949, there was filed with this Commission the petition of Martin J. Stately and Frances E. Stately, requesting the re-zoning of the following described real property in the City of Arcadia, to wit: That portion of lot 43, Tract No. 11969, as shown on . map recorded in Book 259, pages 36 and 37 of Maps, records of Los Angeles County, and that portion of lot . 4, Tract No. 2409, as shown on map recorded in Book 23, page 23 of Maps, lying between the northerly pro- longations of the easterly and westerly lines of lot . 38 of said Tract No. 11969, being located at 322 Huntington Place, to permit the above described property to be used for the p1~- pose of multiple dwelling; and ~VHEREAS, after due notice, ~s required by the provisions of Ordinance Ho. 760, of the City of Arcadia, a public hearing was duly held on the matter before this Commission on the first day of December, 1949, and all interested parties were given a full opportunity to be heard, and ~nEREAS, in the opinion of this Commission, the proposed re-zoning of the aforesaid property would be detrimental to the pUblic welfare and injurious to surrounding property, and would adversely affect the Comprehensive General Plan of this City, 1. \~\ ,{\ 10 / ,/ . . ,. . .. . . \ITiEREAS, in the opinion of this Commission pUblic neces- sity and convenience and the general welfare do not require or indicate the desirability of the variance requested, NOD, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLv~ that this Cownission here- by reco~nends to the City Council of the City of J~cadia ~lat the aforesaid petition be disapproved and denied, for the follouinG reasons, to wit: 1. The request of Detitioners is contrary to the spirit and intent of the Llaster Zoninl; Plan of the City of .\rcadia which ~as adopted and became effective on June 3rd, 1949, after a series of public hearin::;s and vlhich plan VI as unanimously a.pproved by the Planning COlllmission and the City Council; 2. A majority of property ouners within a 300 foot ra- dius of the property in question, and other property ovmers in the neighborhood, have objected to any variance that Vlould permit the invasion of business uses into a residential district or zono, SUCll property OiTIlerS being desirous of, and entitled to, the maintaininc the present residential zoning of the area involved. 3. The PlanninG Oo=ission considers it inconsiste!1t with [Iood planning pl'actice to encourage or pormit heavy tl'l\cki'1':; and other commercial practices upon or over residontial property and to thus circumvent the intent of the J.iaster ZoninG Ordinance; A,rD, ',,<SR:C:AS, the secret9.1'y shall certify to the ado",tior. of this Resolution, and shall forward a copy ~o the City Council of the City of Arcadia. I ~REBY C~TIFY that the foregoins Resolution ~as adopt- ed by the City Planninc Cornnission at a reeular meetinG held on tho Z-"J. f, b J;: "'!' day of ;~~~~~.Y' 1950, by the follo~7inr; votes: AY~S: Mr. Anderson, Davis, Robertson and Smith. l~Oi!:S: None. ABSEi~: Mr. Smith. ~~- ~ t?A-/<-- ...,. 01 ' lQlI'mnn . . Secretary.