HomeMy WebLinkAbout0036
4
.
.
.
RESOLUTIOlJ no. 36
A HESOLUTIOU OF ~'frr; CITY PLArTIfD-rG COJ..'l,:ISSIO.N
OF TIlE CITY OF ARGALlIA, CALIFORlTIA, R~COJ;;::EN-
:)n~G THE G~U'ITmG OJ!' A ZOlm VARIANCE AFFECTING
CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED m SAID CITY TO
PERl~IT TIIE JlADlT:3l{.iI.1JCE OF Jill AUTOllOBIL"E PARKING
LOT TIIEREON.
THE crry PLAUNDm CO]l:!ISSION OF TIm CITY OF ARCADIA,
CaLIb'ORNIA, DOES }f;<;HEBY RESOLVE AS FOLLO'.JS:
.
','II!J]RTIAS, on the 14th day of Septenber, 1950, there \'Ias
filed with this Commission the petition of Ingegerd Isakson as owner
requesting a zone variance on the following described property in the
City of Arcadia, to wit:
Lots 17 and l8 and the west 22' of Lot 16,
Tract J,jo. 13252, in the City of Arcadia,
County of Los Angeles, State of California,
as per i~ap recorded in Book 31~5, pages 6 to
8 of Ilaps in the office of the County Re-
corder of Los Angeles County,
to permit the maintenance thereon of an automobile parking lot; and
~~AS, after notice required by Ordinance ITa. 760 of said
Ci ty, a public hearing on the matter was held before this Commission on
the 5th day of October, 1950, and all interested parties were Given a
full opportunity to be heard there at,
NO~, THE~~FORE, be it resolved that this Commission make
the following findings of fact and the following recommendations to the
City COlUlcil of the City of Arcadia:
1. That there were numerous protests, both written and
oral, against the granting of said application; that said property is
now and for some time has been zoned R-3; that ouch of the' merit of such
~ protests oan be raooved by the imposition of adequate conditions and res-
trictions in the granting of perroissien to maintain the automobile
parking lot requested.
2. That all of said property is adjacent to and across
the alley from property already zoned for and developed as parking lots;
that at least a portion of the property involved could be maintained as
parkinG area in connection with the church adjacent thereto. These cir-
cumstances are exceptional and do not apply generally to the property in
-l-
~ ~ j/.-' 'r.' <:c
A fi ' cY' 0 v
}o1 f
the same vicinity or zone.
.
.
.
.
.
.
,.
l. That said property was formerly City owned property
a portion of which was unzoned and is adjaoent to City owned proper-
ty which is still unzoned. That these oircumstanoes are unusual and
do not apply generally to the property in the same zone.
2. That the granting of the varianoe herein recommended
will not be inoonsistent with good planning practice or the pro-
..
visions of the Master Zoning Plan, or with the present development
in the neighborhood in whioh said property is located, nor will the
granting of the variance as hereinafter reoommended adversely affeot
the oomprehensive general plan.
3. That such variance is necessary for the preservation
and enjoyment of substantial property rights of the ownell' and
. that the granting of the variance herein recommended will not be
materially detrimental to the pUblio welfare or injurious to the
property or improvements in such vicinity and mne in which the pro-
perty is looated.
4. That for the above reasons, this Commission recommend
to the City Council of the City of Arcadia that a variance for the
oonstruction and operation of a public sohool on the property herein-
above desoribed be granted.
The Seoretary shall certify to the adoption of this
Resolution and shall forward a oopy to the City Council of the City
of Aroadia.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was adopted
by the City Planning Commission at a regular meeting held on the
It 21st day of Deoember, 1950, by the following vote:
AYES: Anderson, Knutson. Robertson, Sorenson, Weickert.
NOES: None.
ABSENT:
Mr. Berky and
smith>-=_ ~ /2
"<~ t4~
Chai rms.n
Secretary
..2-