Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout0055 ~. . . . ... . RESOLUTION NO. 55 i1 }lli:>OLU'rIOH Ol-' Tfu.. CITY PLil.:'flHRG COI\iiliISSION OF Ti:I.L CITY Oi<' ARCa,)!A, Ci,LIFORHIA, R14CO~.;;..:E,TD- :nm ~.t1.u .ili!;NlaL OF' <l. PETITI01~ FOR 11. ZOlr.c; V.lJ-1J:JIlWB ;..FFZ-CTnJG C:cRTAIH ~L l'ROP RTY LOC1.TLD TIf S...ID CITY. Tl& CI'ry PLJ.l'lN H:O COi.I1aISSIOii A}' TilL CITY OF ,.Rt;,.u)l.<t DOLS l'DID. DbT.LiRi.lif'l!: AJ:'D nLSOLV.,; AS FOLLO',IS: \/J:h.iliU\S, on the 6th day of Ifovember. 1951, there was filed with this Commission, the petition of Adolph B. Bichele, as ovmer, re- questing a zone variance affectine the following described real property in the City of l~cadia, to wit: The West 45.l9 feet of Lot 29 and the Bast 50 feet of Lot 30, Tract No. 3430, as shown on map recorded . in Book 42, page 32 of Uaps, records of Los AnGeles County. and located at 540 pairview Avenue, to permit the construction of a fourth Single family dwelling upon said property, ~resently zoned R-l; and, \jJfuRI.;;;.S. after due notice, as required by the provisions of Ordinance No. 760 of the City ot Arcadia. a public hearing was held on the matter by and before this COlil!D.lssion on ]ovember 27, 1951, at which time all interested parties were Given an opportunit~ to be heard and to present eVidence; ilO~, T~EFORE, BE IT R~SOLVKD, that this Commission make the follo~ing findings and reoommendations to the City Council of the City of Arcadia: S~CTIO~ 1. That there are no exceptional or extraordinary ~ circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved, or to the intended use of the property, that do not apply 6enerally to the property or class of uses in the same vicinity or zone, except that applicant has in the oourse of completion, a fourth single faMily res- idence thereon. under a purported buildinG permit issued contrary to Ordinance No. 760; ~hat the latter circumstance does not, in the opinion \ \ , ~ "J.~~ t. " hi h _u t' . . . . . City of ic/.I'cadia: S1!:CTIOli 1. That the request of the petition is contrary to the spirit and intent of the master zoning plan of the City of Arcadia, which was adopted and became effective June 3, 19l!9. SECTION 2. That the granting of such request is not necessary for the preservation or enjoyment of any substantial property right of the applicant, as the property is well suited for the purposes to which it may lawfully be put. S~CTION 3. That there are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property involved, sufficient to warrant the grantine; of the var.ii.ance requested. ShCTION 4. That the granting of the variance requested would adversely affect the property and improvements in the same vIcinity . and zone. RESOLVED FURT;~R, that t~is Commission recommend to the City Cowlcil of the City of l~cadia, that said applicant.s petition for a zone variance be denied. RLSOLVLD PU~T;LR, that the Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this resolution, and shall forward a copy of the same to the Cit~ Council of the City of brcadia. I RLH~c\Y CLn7IFY that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the City Planning Commission at an adjourned regular meeting held on the 4th day of December, 1951., by the following vote: b.Y:';S: Anderson, Balser, Knopp, Smith, Sorenson, \Ieickert . HOES: Hone AlJSMIT: Ber ky ;=-~ "---~ ~~~ Chairman .!l.TThs'r: .~.OJ\ secretary