HomeMy WebLinkAbout0080
.
.
.
RESOLUTION NO. 80
A RESOLlTTION OF THE CD.'Y PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ARCADIA, CALIFOIDITli., RID::Ol~1ENDING THE DEl'IIAL OF A PETITION
FOR A ZONE VARIANCE AFFECTING CERTADl REAL PROPERTY LOCATED
IN SAID CITY.
THE CITY PLAllNING COMHISSION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA DOES FIND, DETERMINE
AI'<,]) RESOLVE AS FOLID\fS:
\'ffiEREAS, on June 4, 1952, there was filed with this Commission the petition
of Henry S. Ford, as Ol'mer, requesting a zone variance affecting the following
described property in the City of Arcadia, to wit:
The north 30 feet of lot ll, block 73, Santa Anita Tract, as shown
on map recorded in Book 15, pages 89 and 90, Miscellaneous Records
of Los Angeles County, being the rear 30 feet, facing on the alley,
of the property !mown as 41 Alta Street,
to permit said property to be used for the business of radio and television sales
. and repairs or watchmaking and repairing in the existing building located on the
property; and,
WREREJ\S, after due notice, as required by the provisions of Ordil'l'''''''e No.
760 of the City of Arcadia, a public hearing was held on the matter by and before this
Commission on June 24, 1952, at which time all interested parties were given an
opportunity to be heard and to present evidence}
NOW, 'D!EREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Commission make the following
findings an<i recOllll1lendations to the City Council of the City of Arcadia;
SECTION 1. That the request of the petition is contrary to the spirit and
intent of the master zoning plan of the City of Arcadia, which \~as adopted and became
effect.ive June 3, 1949.
SECTION 2. That the granting of such request is not necessary for the
preservation or enjoYl1lent of any substantial property right of thlO' applicant, as the
. property is well suited for the purposes to which it may law~' be put.
SECTION 3. That there are no e~eptional or extraordinary circumstances
applicable to the property involved, sufficient to warrant the grantinG of the
variance requested.
SECTIOU 4. That the erantinG of the variance requested would ac1verse1.v
affect the property and improvements in the same vicinity and zone.
-1-
t. '/,,,,<J~=,{
V ',I:,.M'
BO
.
.
. I rlEllliBY CERTIt'"y that the foret:oing resolution liaS adopted by the City
Plannine; Conunission at a regular meetint; held on the 22nd day of J~, 19~2, bJi the
followin!7 vote:
AY"~S:
!rOES:
ABSENT:
Hr. Anderson, "alser, Danver, Knopp, Pratt and Sorenson
]{one
Hr. Berky
ATTEST:
secr~
.
.
-2-