HomeMy WebLinkAbout0092
, . .
.
.
.
.
.
RESOLU'l'ION IiO.92
A RESOLU'l'ION OF THE CITY PI.AlmING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMEND-
IlfG THE GRANTIHG OF A ZOlfE VARIANCE AFFECTING
CER'l'AlN REAL PROPERTY IN SAID CITY TO PERMIT
THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A PUBLIC
SCHOOL THEREON.
WHEREAS, the Arcadia City Planning Collllll1asion, by its Resolution
No.84 adopted September 10, 1952, instituted proceedings for the
consideration and possible granting of a zone variance upon tbe
following descrlbed property, to-vit:
The West 169.22 feet of Bast 1370 feet, except of
streets, of Lot 3, Tract No.950, as shown on map
recorded in Book 17, Page 25 of Maps, and Lots 1
to 12 inclusive, Tract No.11969, except of Flood
Control Easement, as sbovn on III&P recorded in Book
259. Pages 36 and 37 of Maps, Records ot Los
Angeles Count1',
to permit the 8&111e to be used tor the construction, maintenance and
operation of a public school; and
WHEREAS, after Dotice required by Ordinance No.760 of said
Cit1 a public hearing was duly beld on tbe I118tter b1 and before
th1s Couua1ssion on the 23rd day ot September 1952, at which time
all interested persons were given a full opportunit1' to be heard
and to present evidence;
NOW, THEREFORE, the Clty Planning Collllll1ssion or the City of
Arcadia does hereby deterlll1ne and resolve as tollows:
SECTION 1. That there were no protests to the granting of
the proposed variance.
That said propert1' is adjacent to an extena1ve park on the
North through wbicb there 1s not and cannot be any aCCeBB) that
th1s fact makes the property more suitable tor a pub11c school
s1 te.
That the granting of the variance herein recollllllended vill not
be inconsistent with good planning practice or the provisions of
tbe Master Zoning plan. or w1tb the present deve10plllent of the
ne1ghborbood in wh1cb said property 1s located, nor will the grant-
ing ot the variance' as bereinafter recolllllended adverse11 affect the
comprehensive general plan.
That such var1ance 1s necessar1 ror the preservat10D and
., . ~ '.
j" If
"-:->.r4.
9 2 .:;>-' '/ I
-1-
.",.1 I"i...r
1
., t '
)
till
~.
.
.
,
,
,
.
.
uses and 1s properl1' su1ted tor such developments.
That further expansion ot the zoning to unl1m1ted commere1al
uses would be premature and harmful in part tor tbe reason that
there 1s more cOJlllDerc1a1 property in tbe general area tban the de-
mand requires, and furtber expansioD of cOJlllDerc1al uses onl, pre-
vents the orderl1' development ot tbe commun1t1' and retards the
proper development thereof.
SECTION 2. That for the foregoing reasons this Comm1sa10n
reeoJlllDends to the C1ty Council of tbe City ot Arcad1a tbat the
petit10n for rec1ass1f1cat1on ot the subject property be denied.
SECTION 3. The Secretary sball certify to the adopt10n
of th1s Resolut1on, and shall cause a copy of the same to be for-
warded to the City Council of the City of Arcad1a.
I HRREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Reso1ut1on was adopted
b1 the C1 ty Plazming Colllll1sa1on at a regular meeting held on the
14th d&1' ot October, 1952, b1' the following vote:
AYES: Mr: Anderson, Balser, Berky, Danver, Knopp, Pratt, Sorenson
NOES: None
ABSBB~ :
None
ATTEST:
~~.
Cha1rman
$l~~L~
Acting Secreta
-2-