HomeMy WebLinkAbout0099
.
.
.
I
.
.
RESOWTION .NO. 99
A TlESOIl'TION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE ~ITY OF AR~ADIA, CAUFORi'lIA, REr:OMMENDING TIlE
GRANTING OF A ZONE VARIANr:E .~FEr.TING nERTAIN REAL
PROPEFlTY IN SAID r.ITY TO PERMIT DEVIATION FROM FRONT
YARD REQ,1JIREMENTS.
~HEREAS, ~n December 9, 1952, this ~ommission ~dorten ReB01~tinn
No.96 uhereby p"'ON'ed~n.:s were ins t1tuted to ~hange thE' r"'('lT't Yl'l't"d
rp~li't"enE'ntD 6ffe~tins the real property therein deacrlbe~i and
VHERF.AS, aftEl't" not1~e required by nrr'linanC'e No.76n of 5('.io.
City, a publl~ hearine was held by And nefore this ~0~m1sDi0~ on
thE' 13th d~y of January 1953, at which time all perS('lns 1nterE'stE'd
~/(",..e given a full opportunity to 'he heard;
!HJ1,f, TIIF'.REFORE, the City Plannin~ r01llI!1.1ssion of the (':"- ty of
J..rf'D.ritD., nalifornia, does herl'by f1!1d, resolvE' end re~nTl1":lc!'.d as
follow!': :
1 - That there were no protests, orpl or written to ~h~ crn]'\t~n~
of the vari=ce chang1n1! the setnac){ on the property heret'13fter
de:::crt1:>ed.
2.- T~~t the erantin~ of the variance hereinafter re~o~~ended
w111 not be inc"!1s1eteut ~/:l:th "oed pl'lJ1n1:ng prc"t~.ce nor the prov!stone
of the ~'lastcr Zoning Pla'1, nor the pl'e>lfmt nevelot'ment of the
n!'lsh'uol'llood ~.n 'Whic-h the 5ubje~t prop!'rty is l""'eteCl, ""1' wUl thf'
Ere'1tiut; of 311C'h vl'rip.J'll"e nc.versoly a.fft<ct the cnmpl'ehvl'wlve ~el1eral
p'.o.?J .
3 - That such variance is '1~"ersary fo~ the preservntlon ~d p.n-
JOJI'lent of Ftl'!:l:>tanttnl pro~ortJ l':.:;hts of the elmer.
4 - ~het the Grantins of the varl~ce ber61nafter reco~ende0
,,111 not "'0 l:w:tcr1p,llJ detrl"llcntel to thE' ~ublic ln~lre.re nor 1111j;.u-lo;lt
~o the .rr~~ope:rtJ or iLlflrn'lcoentr 'in snch vir'LnltJ tH' zC'ne in ,~hlch
the subject propert~ is located.
:5 - Thai; the lott c':',r.pl'i~i!1'; the ~t~lJj~ct prOp('l.t~. ~~>:'c U:li.l~LW.l1i
t.lll:llO;/j thllt becc.u:w of th0 51zc and chnps 01' the lot:? f'Pl!lr!.tanne
wtth bo;;h reel', fl'ont and e<'dc ;c<i'U re1luirencnte WO'.lld I'!) eytremal.r
c.lft':Lc",l t if not impossl;)le; thE. t this circumstance is exccr:tioD(\l
llnd not t,;enerallJ applicable to the property in the sari!' \'icini ty
-1-
99
,
, .
tace of the City of Arcadia.
~e c~~etl:ecretary shall certify to the adoption of this
"01 t.v
shall forward. 8. copy of the same to the City Council
5o\~~~~f Arcadia.
11.6 ,
t t.~e! HEREBY CERTIFY that the f'oregoing Resolution was
o~he C1ty Planning CoDllll1ssion at a regular meeting held
!
e.i'~ day of February 1953. by the following vote:
I AYES: Commissioners Anderson. Balser, Knopp, Pratt ana. Sorenson
I
I
NOES:
None
.
i ABSENT I Commissioners Berky and Danver
I
!
\ I
I
\
\
// A~"T:
/ K)u,~
/ Secretary.
.
.
~
.
.
is a service to the community and is much in demand; that the
appl1cant's business being hand operated lacks the obnoxious
features ordinarily resulting from the use of mechanical washers
and dryers in Automobile Laundries.
4 . That the property involved is of triangular shape,
bounded on two sides by pUblic streets and on the third side by a
, Railroad, Which c~rcumstance8 are exceptional and do not apply
generalAY to the property in the same vicinity and zone.
5 - That the granting of the requested extens10n for the
period of time hereinafter recommended will not be inconsistent
with good planning practice nor the provis10ns of the Me.ster zon.
ing Plan, nor w1th the present development of the neighborhood in
which the said property i8 located, nor will the granting of the
variance as recommended adversely affect the geDeral comprehensive
plan.
6 - Tha.t the variance recollllllanded is necessary for the
preservation and enjoyment of substant1al property rights of the
Applicant because such property by reason of its shape and location
is not su1ted for many of the uses for which it is basically zoned.
7 - That the granting of the variance as hereinafter
recommended will not be mater1a1ly detrimental to the general wel-
fare nor injurious to the 1mprovements in such vicinity and zone
in which the property is located.
That for the above reasons th1s Commission recommends to
the Oi ty Council that the existing variance affecting the follOWing
described real property in said City to-wit;
Lot 1 of Tract No.5205 as per Map recorded 1n Book
54, Page 61 of Maps in the offlce of the County
Recorder of Los Angeles County,
be extended for an additional three years, to-~1t: to the 18th
day of July, 1956 upon all condit1ons heretofore imposed by said
Resolution No.2050, subject to the further condit10n that the
operator of said Automobile Laundry shall at any time throughout
the existance of the var1ance hereby recommended place and maintain
on said premises such traff1c d1rectional signs as may be required
-2-