HomeMy WebLinkAbout0100
,
,.
.
.
RESOLUTION NO.IOO
A RESOLUTIC!: OF THE CITY PIAi'U'UNG COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, RErOM~~IDING THE G~~T-
rNG OF A ZONE VARIAlfCE AFFEf":TINO CERTAIN REAL PRO-
PERTY IN SAID CITY TO PERMIT THE COHTINIJATIOU OF AN
EXISTIIiG AUTOMOBILE 'LAUNDRY PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED.
WHEREAS, on July 6, 1950, this City PIWkiinc Commif3~on adopted
its Resoh.Lt1on No.29 where.!.n it reeomroended the granting of a V8:::'-
iance to permit the real property located at 222 E. Runtin6ton
Drive in said City to be used for an Automobile Laundry upon the
conditions therein contained; and
ilHEREAS, the r:lty Council of the City of Arcadia did on July
18, 1950, adopt its certain Resolution No.2050 where1:l .1nd whereby
the fl..rld1ne:;s and recommendations of this Commission contained in
its said Resolution No. 29 were adopted ~~d approved and a variance
for an Automobile Laundry at 222 E. Huntington Drive in sa.id City
tit was emnted upon the conditions contained in said Resolution No.2050;
.
and
WHEREAS, on January 6, 1953, a petition was filed with this
Comm1ssion by the lessees of the property hereina.fter described for
the extens10n of the var1ance heretofore granted by said Resolution
IITo.20.50j a.'ld
WHERE/,SJ after notice required by Ordinance No.76o of the City
of A~c8dia a public hearing on said request was held by and before
this Comm.ission on the 27th day of January 1953, at which time all
interested persons were given a full opportunity to be heard and
to present evidence.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that this Commission Illl\ke the
follOWing findings and reoommendations to the City Council of the
. City of Arcadia:
1 - That there were no protests to the granting of said petition.
2 - That the only hardship alleged to result from the operation
of the Automobile Laundry heretofore authorized is traffic con-
gestion on Third Avenue reEulting from patrons of said Automobile
Wash waiting their turn to be served.
3 - That experience has shown that an Automobile Hane':. Laundry
as operated under the variance heretofore granted to pet1tioners,
-1-
100
.'
.
.
ing of the requested variance.
. That for the foregoine reasons this Commission recommends
to the City Council that the requested var1ance be denied.
The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this ~e.
solution, and shall forward a copy of the same to the Clt~ Council
at' the City of Arcadia.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was adopted
by the City Planning Commission at a regula!' meeting held on the
24th day of February, 1953, by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Anderson, Balser, Knopp, Pratt and Sorenson
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Berky and Danve
.
ATTEST:
I.
-2-
Of
(