HomeMy WebLinkAbout0115
. ,
.
.
.
RESOLUTION NO. ll~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
THE DENIAL OF AN APPLICATION FOR A ZONE VARIANCE
TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION AND USE OF A GREEN-
HOUSE IN ZONE R-l.
WHEREAS, there was filed with this Commission the petition of
John K. and Zabelle Asder, as owners, for a variance to permit the
.
following described property, to-wit:
A part of Lot 7, Tract NO.948, as shown on map
recorded in Book 17, Page 21 of Maps, records
of Los Angeles County, described as follows:
Beginning at a point in the East line of said Lot
North 15 feet trom the Southeast corner thereof;
thence North 89033' West 203.6 feet; thenoe North
1018.50" West to the South Line of Foothill
Boulevard; thence East thereon to the East line of
said lot; thence South thereon to the point of be-
ginning, being located at 310 West Foothill BoUlevard,
to be used for the construction, maintenance and use of a green-
house 28 feet by 95 feet thereon, in addition to two existing
greenhouses presently located thereonbeing 21 feet by 75 feet and
18 feet by 20 feet respectively in sizej and
WHEREAS, after notice required by Ordinance No.760 of said
City publiC hearing was held on the matter by and before this Com-
mission on the 14th day of July, 1953, at which time all interested
persons were given a full opportunity to be heard and to present
evidence.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Planning Commission of the Cit1' of
Arcadia does hereby find, determine and resolve as follows:
SECTION 1. That there is already located and ln use on subject
property two greenhouses exceeding in size the five hundred square
feet permissible in Zone R-l for private gre~nhouses; that the
. existing greenhouses constitute non-conforming uses. That applicants
are presently engaged in the commercial bus1ness of raising and
selling plants not grown in the ground, to-wit: orchids.
SECTION 2. That subject property is Bell suited for the pur-
poses for which it is presently zoned. That the granting of the
variance requested is not necessary for the protection or preser-
vation of substantial property rights of the applicants; that the
further extension of commercial uses on subject property is neither
~-
115
.
.
.
01
"
.
.
SECTIOR 3. That tor the roregoing reasons this Collllll1ssion
recommends to the Cit;v Councl1 or said Clty that the zone variance
be denied.
The Secreta1"7 shall certity to the adoption or th18 He-
solutlon. and shall rorward a copy or the same to the City COUDcl1
or the Cit;v or Arcadia.
I flErdmx CERTIFY that the roregoing Resolution was adopted
b;V the Cit;, Planning Collllll1ss1on a-t a regu-lar meet1ng held on the
11th da;v or August, 1953, b7 the rollowing vote:
AYES: Commissioners Anderson, Balser, Knopp, Pratt and Robertson
ROES: None
~Eafr: Commissioners Berky and Sorenson
G?~~~
A'l"l'EST:
-2-