HomeMy WebLinkAbout0125
.
.
RESOLUTION N8.125
.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING CO~~SSION
OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA. CALIFORNIA, DECLARING
ITS INTENTION TO !NSTITUTE PROCEEDINGS FeR THE
CONSIDERATION OF AND MAKING RECOMMENDATIONS
CONCERNING THE AMENDMENT OF SECTIONS 7. 8. 9.
10. AND 15 OF ORDINANCE NO.76o OF THE CITY OF
ABCADIA ABD ADDING SECTION 8~ THERETO.
THE CrTY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA DOES
I1EREBY FIND. DETERMINE AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the pUblic health and welfare of the City
of Arcadia and the inhabitants thereof require the consideration
of and the institution of proceedings relative to the amendment of
Sections 2. 7. 8, 9, 10 and 15 of Ordinance No.760 of the City of
Arcadia and the ac\U tion of Section Ej to said Ordinance No. 760
by creating three Commercial Zones. specifying the commercial uses
permitted in each thereof. by excluding from Zone R-3 certain com-
~ mercial uses presently permitted therein by adding the definition
of Automobile Service Station. Super-Service StatIon and Self-Ser-
vice Launderette by prOViding off-street parking requirements for
commercial zonee. all substantially as set forth in Exhibit A
attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. as the same
may be amended or altered as this Commission may deem advisable
after the conclusion of the proceedings hereby instituted.
SECTION 2. That Tuesday, the lOth day of November 1953.
at the hour of 8:00 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the
City Hall. 240 W. Huntington Dr.. Arcadia. California. is hereby
fixed and determined as the day. hour and place of the hearing
for the consideration of said matters.
The Secretary shall certifJ to the adoption of this Re-
tIJ solution and shall cause to be published notice of the date. place
and purpose of said hearing ir. the manner required by law.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was
adopted by the City Planning Commission at a regular meeting held
on the 22nd day of September. 1953. by the following vote:
-1-
i23
.
.
.
.
.
.
SECTION ::;.
That the ~rantln2 of th~ variance requested
will not 3.nversely -;>.ff<!ct the com9rehen, iv" /jcneral .)lan; on the
contrary it conforms ~ith the general plan already established
at m~j()r art?rial interst'ctlons through the City.
F?r the foregoing reasons this Commlos:on recommends t?
the I:lty C01.\ncil that the variance be gr<inted to permit Lot3 1, 2
and 3 of 3utject property to be used for the constructiun~ mointen-
~nce and operation of an automobil~ service station upon the pxpress
condition that d 80li1 wall or fence be constructed aix feet in
heigh~long the N~rtherly line o~ Lot 3 anj along the Ea~terly
lines of Lots 1, 2 and 3. the height thereof being reduced at the
setback line to conform with applicable City Ordinances. and to
perr.it the remainder of subject property to be used for the con-
structicn. mAintenance and operation of multiple famjly dwellings.
The Secretary sh~ll certify to the adoption of this Resolution,
and shall forward a copy of the same to the City Council of th~
City of Arcadia.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was adopt~d
by the City Planning Commission at a regular meetine held 011 the
27th day of october
I 1953, by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Anderson, Balser, Berky, Knopp and Sorenson
NOES: None
A BSEN"': Collllllissioners Pratt
~~
- a~ir
ATTF;ST:
/.1~tL or l1iL~ ,-
~retary !
-3-
.
.
.
ance now in effect. That said Lots 1. 2. and 3 are located on
the Northeast corner of Second Avenue and Duarte Road; that Duarte
Road is one of the through East-West traffic arterials in the City
of Arcadia; that Second Avenue is a major North-South ~rterial and
one of only three through North-South streets in the City of Arcadia.
That Second Avenue is the Northerly extension of Tyler Avenue; that
Tyler Avenue is a major County highway and has been improved as
Buch; that both Second Avenue and Duarte Road are heavily travelled
traffic arterials; that subject properties already have a variance
for heavier commercial uses and have been developed for and for
some time used for the conduct of a retail poultry and egg sales.
commercial nurSEry and custom dressing plant. That the size of
subject lots. their shape and location with reference to inter-
sections and traffic arterials and their proximity to properties
used, developed or zoned for cJmmercial purposes are extraordinary
clrccmstanc~s and conditions not applicable to properties general-
ly in the same vicinity or zone.
SECTION 3. That fop the foregoing reasons subject pro-
perties are not economically or reasonably capable of being u3ed
or developed for the purposes for which they are presently zoned;
that numerouS other properties aimilarly located at the inter-
sections of major traffic arterials have been granted zoning or
variancps for commercial purposes subotantially as set out in
petitioners' application. For these reasons the granting of the
variance re~uested is reasonably necessary for the preservati~n
and enjoyment of substantial property rights of the applicants.
SECTION 4. That the granting of the vari~nce requested
\.(:\ J 1 not be materially detrimental t-: the public ~lelf~re or in-
jurioul to the property cr improvementc in the vicinity ano zone
i~ w~ich the property is )oc~t2d. ~ut th~ const~~ction of multip'~
f~oily units on all of subject property other than Lots I, 2 ~nj
three wil: afford a logical and rpaaonablc buffer bet~e~n the
~ommprcial use reqtle~tcd on the corner. ICEic~l and r~a3nnahJe
c':,'v('lopment of Lots 1, 2 and :3 is for light commerci.3.l U9..S.
.
.
-2-