Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout0164 .... '\ .... . . . RESOLUTION NO.164 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF REQUESTED VARrANCE AFFECTING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY IN SAID CITY. WHEREAS, there was filed with this Collllllission the petition of Ralph D. Stogsdill and Lula P. Stogsdill, as owners, for a variance to permit the following described property, to-wit: The east 120 feet of Ict 2.3 of Tract No. 6641, Book 126, Page 61 of Maps in the office of the County Redorder of Los Angeles County and Lot 25 of Tract No. 6641, Book 126, Page 61 of Maps in the office of the County Recorder, Ics Angeles County. . to be ueed for all uses presently pemitted in Zone C-2, excepting thoee uses specified in subsections 9,10,1.3,.32,4.3,58, and 64 of part .0\ of Section 9 of Ordinance No. 760 of said City; WHEREAS, after notice required by Orrl:lnA.nce No. 160 of said City, a public hearing was duly held on the matter by and between this Collllllission on the 21th day of July, 1954, at which time all interested persons were given a full opportunity to be heard and to present. evidence; NOW TREREFORE, the City Planning COIIIIIli.ssion does hereby determine and resolve as follows: SECTION 1. That there were protests to the granting of the requested variance, based particularly on the fact that no campre- hensi ve scheme has been proposed for the reclassification or develop- tnBnt of the area of which subject property is a part. SECTION II. That this Conunission has heretofore recognized the need for affording some relief to borderline properties, and to that end . has held public hearings and heretofore recommended to the City Council the ammendment of Ordinance No. 760 by the establishment of four commercial zones. That the City Council has called a public hearing for the purpose of considering the sa:l.d recommendations of this COIIIIIli.ea1on and maldng determinations relative thereto. That thereafter the City Council may - 1 - , ~.. -I' ,,_ . . soon adopt ammendments to Ordinance No. 160, creating four cOllllll6rcial . zones substantially as heretofore recommended by this Commission. That upon and within the framework of such ammendment of Ordinance No. 160, proper relief can be afforded property owners w.l.thout excessive damage to adjacent properties. That the relief herein requested can, if proper, best be afforded applicants atter the lIllIlIlllndment of Ordinance No. 160 as heretofore recommended. That this Commission has heretofore declared and presently re4l'irms its intention to consider various areas of the City immediately upon request, and in orderly fashion, t1.pon its awn motion, for the purpose of determining what properties should be reclassified tor zoning purposes upon the adoption of the amendment to Ordinance No. 160, as heretofore recommended. SECTION lIT. That tor the foregoing reasons, the application herein is, and a decision thereupon would be,premaWre. That as required . by Section 16 J of Ordinance No. 160, this Commission does detennine and recommend that the final decision upon the extension of uses permissible upon subject property be deferred until a final decision be made by the City Council upon the recommendations of this Commission for the amendment of Ordinance No. 160 by the creation of four ccnmnercial zonas, and that the within application at this t:iJne be denied without prejudice to further consideration of subject property, either singly or in con- junction with other properties simularly situated or affected. SECTION IV. The Secretary shall certify to this Resolution and shall cause a copy to be fOI'llarded to the City Council of the City ot Arcadia. . I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Planning Commission held on this 24th da\Y of August, 1954, by the following vote: AmS: Commissioners Anderson, Balser, Daly, Robertson and Sorenson NOES: None ~ENT: Commissioners Knopp and Pratt ~~AJA / AT~ST : 'A/YvvqaJi~( Secretary r - 2 -