Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout0156 (' . . . RESOLUTION NO. 156 . . A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDnlG THE DENIAL OF THE REQ.UE8TED ZONE RECLASSIFICATION FROM ZONE R-2 TO ZONE C-2 AND RECOMMENDING THE GRANTING OF THE REQ.UE8TED RECLASSIFICATION FROM ZONE R-2 TO PR-2 AFFECTING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY IN SAID C rry WHEREAS, there was filed with this Commission the petition of E. W'. Bates, as owner of the following described property: A pert of' Santa Anita Rancho as shown on map-, recorded in Patent Book 1, pages 97 and 98, records of' Los Angeles County, described as follows: That portion of the 4.0 foot wide strip of land shown as "Southern Pacific Railroad Right of Way" on Map of Tract No. 34.30, recorded in Book 42, page 32 of Maps, records of said County, included within the northerly porlongation of the easterly and westerly lines of the easterly 69 f'eet of Lot 1 of said Tract No. 3430, being a per tion of the abandoned Southern Pacific Railroad right of 'flay looated approximately 229.44. feet east of t he east line of Bald win Avenue requesting a change of zone from Z'.one R-2 to Z'one C-2 or PR-2; and WHEREAS" a1'ter due notice as required by law, a public hearing was held in the matter by and befat"e this Commission on May 25, 1954, at which tim all interested persons were given a f111l opportunity to be heard and to present evidence; NOR', THEREFCRE, the City Planning Commission or the City of Arcadia does hereby find, determine and resolve as follows:: SECTION 1. That there were protests to the granting of certain of the aforesaid zone reclassifications,. That the subject property is a paroel 4.0 feet by 60 feet in e:iz&, conmituting a por- tion of the abandoned Southern Pacific Railroad right of way. That said ~rcel is within the alignment of a future street as shown on Sheet No.3. of the Block Maps of the City, recommended by the City Planning Commission on Sep; ember 30, 1952,. end approved by the City Council on January 6, 1953. That the requested reclassification to Z:one C-2 would result in a small segment of oommercial property being pIeced between adjacent residentia;!. properties:. That the - I - 156 -. . . . . . . granting 01' the 0'-2 zone reclassification would be contrary to the comprehensive general pllll. is not neceslfary 1'01' the preservatiam of substantia!: property rights and would be inimical to the heal th and weU'are of the reS'1dents 01' the area and detrimental to the adja- cent residenti&] properties. SECTION 2. That subject properwhas no street frontage and, in the opinion of this Commission. is subject to a parking ovar1ay as iii transitional use under the provisions of Ordinance No. 760; that any ambiguity or uncertainty in this regard can, and should be removed by granting the requested reclassification to Z'one PR-2. SECTION 1+ That for the foregoing reasons: this Commission recommends to the City'Council that the requested reolassification to Zone C-2 be den1edJ that the requested reclassi1'lcatlon to Zone . PR-2 be granted. SECTION 4. The Secretary shall certify to the adopticn of this Resolution and shall cause a copy of the same to be forwarded to the City Council 01' the City of Arcadia. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was adopted at a regulat' meeting of the City Planning Commission held on June 22, 1954, by the following vote: AlES: Commissioners Anderson, Daly, Knopp, Pratt, Robertson and Sorenson. NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Balser . ~ Chairman ATTEST: G___1-~ Secretary fr. ..", -2- 156