Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFindings and Action ReportRancho Santa Anita Residents’ Association ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD Findings and Action Report -1- Date: August 22,2022 File No. Project Address: 500 N. Altura Road Association Name: Rancho Santa Anita Residents’ Association Applicant Name: Chun- Hung ( Danny) Li and Helen Li Property Owner(s) Name: Same as applicant Project Description: The applicant is proposing a remodel and addition to an existing 2,670 square foot (SF) 2- story single family residence. 908 SF will be added to the first floor and 616 SF to the second floor. The roof height will be 24 feet and 11 inches. The plan includes a 404 SF attached two car garage that will be expanded to a 702 SF three car garage plus storage and a 232 SF covered patio. Landscaping improvements to the front yard are proposed. FINDINGS Only check those that are apply and provide a written explanation for each The proposed project X is,  is not consistent with the Site Planning Principles and Neighborhood Context Guidelines. Explanation: The building footprint considers potential privacy issues of neighbors. The proposed project X is,  is not consistent with the Forms and Mass Guidelines. Explanation: The building mass will remain very similar to the existing structure when viewed from the front elevation. The proposed project X is,  is not consistent with the Frontage Conditions Guidelines. Explanation: Is compatible with the existing on-site relationship to the street. The proposed project X is,  is not consistent with the Garages and Driveways Guidelines. Explanation: The attached garage will be expanded to a three car garage to meet City standards. Rancho Santa Anita Residents’ Association ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD Findings and Action Report -2- The proposed project X is,  is not consistent with the Architectural Styles Guidelines. Explanation: Has a clear and distinctive architectural style that is consistently applied throughout the design. The proposed project X is,  is not consistent with the Height, Bulk, and Scale Guidelines. Explanation: The height, bulk and scale will remain similar to the existing house. The proposed project X is,  is not consistent with the Roofline Guidelines. Explanation: The roof plan including overhang, color, material, gables and dormers are consistent with the chosen architectural style. The proposed project X is,  is not consistent with the Entries Guidelines. Explanation: The front porch provides an inviting entrance similar to the existing house. The proposed project X is,  is not consistent with the Windows and Doors Guidelines. Explanation: The building facades are well articulated with windows and door types complementary of the architectural style. The proposed project X is,  is not consistent with the Articulation Guidelines. Explanation: The design avoids large expanses of wall plane. The proposed project X is,  is not consistent with the Facade Details Guidelines. Explanation: Façade details consistently applied. Rancho Santa Anita Residents’ Association ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD Findings and Action Report -3- The proposed project X is,  is not consistent with the Colors and Materials Guidelines. Explanation: The design utilizes a pleasant color combination consistent with a modern farmhouse design. The proposed project X is,  is not consistent with the Accessory Lighting Guidelines. Explanation: Exterior lighting fixtures are architecturally compatible with the design. The proposed project X is,  is not consistent with the Additions, Alterations, and Accessory Buildings/Structures Guidelines. Explanation: The homes materials, finishes, colors, windows and siding are consistent with the modern farmhouse architectural style. The proposed project  is,  is not consistent with the Hillside Properties Guidelines. Explanation: NA The proposed project X is,  is not consistent with the Fences, Walls, Gates, and Hedges Guidelines. Explanation: No changes are proposed to existing fences, walls and gates. The proposed project X is,  is not consistent with the Impervious Coverage and Landscape Areas Guidelines. Explanation: The applicant proposes an attractive front landscape which must meet the City’s WELO ordinance requirements for water consumption. Rancho Santa Anita Residents’ Association ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD Findings and Action Report -4- ACTION Pursuant to City’s Development Code Section 9107.20.050, a Site Plan and Design Review in the Homeowners Association Areas may be approved only if it is found that the proposed development is consistent with the City’s adopted Design Guidelines.  APPROVED X CONDITIONALLY APPROVED  DENIED Date of ARB Meeting: AUGUST 18, 2022 Plan approved with the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall propose shutters on the west and south elevations in concurrence with Bob Eriksson. 2. Rack cap tiles are not allowed on the gable and rack ends. 3. Simulated divided lite (SDL) windows are required. Grid patterns must match elevations. Grids must be added to three windows and one door which were identified 4. Before submitting plans for plan check, verify interior SF and that the northerly second story setback meets City standards. 5. Applicant to propose a replacement tree for the two Palo Verde trees in concurrence with Bob Eriksson 6. Applicant agrees to a site visit with Bob Eriksson during planting to verify plant placement and sizing. ARB Members Rendering the Above Decision: AYES: Chan, Eriksson, Medeiros, Pappas NOES: ABSENT: Reason for Denial: There is a ten (10) day appeal period for this application. To file an appeal, a completed Appeal Application form must be submitted to the City’s Planning Division along with a $600.00 appeal fee by 5:30 p.m. on August 29. You will be notified if an appeal is filed. Rancho Santa Anita Residents’ Association ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD Findings and Action Report -5- Approved designs shall expire in one year (August 29, 2023.) from the effective date unless plans are submitted to Building Services for plan-check, a building permit is issued and the construction is diligently pursued, a certificate of occupancy has been issued, or the approval is renewed. The final plans must be consistent with the approved design concept plans and any conditions of approval. Any inconsistency from the approved design concept plans may preclude the issuance of a building permit. An extension may be granted by the ARB or designee, or the Review Authority that approved the project for a maximum period of one (1) year from the initial expiration date. An extension can only be granted if the required findings can be made. Please note that acceptance of an extension request does not indicate approval of an extension. You may visit the City’s website at www.ArcadiaCA.gov/noticesanddecisions to view this document. If you have any questions regarding the above decision, please contact Greg Medeiros, ARB Chairperson at 626-833-0249, ranchosaarb@gmail.com. Thank you. c: City of Arcadia, Planning Division