HomeMy WebLinkAbout1097
. oJ'
_'~;';",~
, ,.tIf; .;n.,;,,)'
," ':. ,:~"':. -:,
#_."
fl
RESOLUTION NO. 1097
, !.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CO~WISSION OF THE
CITY OF ARCADIA MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND
DENYING AN APPEAL OF THE MODIFICATION COMMITTEE'S
APPROVAL OF MODIFICATION M-79-3 ALLOWING A FENCE
TO REMAIN ON THE STREET SIDE OF,A CORNER LOT AT
740 WEST LEUON AVENUE
WHEREAS, on March 13, 1979, an appeal of the Modification Com-
mittee's approval of Modification M-79-3 was filed by Elizabeth R.
Tesiris allowing a fence to remain on the street side of a corner lot
at 740 West Lemon Avenue, more particularly described as follows:
Lot 1 of Block H of the Santa Anita Land
Company Tract as recorded in Map Book 6
Page 137.
WHEREAS, the public hearing was held on March 13, 1979, at which
time all interested persons were given full opportunity to be heard
and to present evidence;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA
HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the factual data submitted by the Planning De-
partment in the attached report is true and correct.
Section 2. That we hereby make the fOllowing findings of fact:
1, That the setbacks of the fence provide adequate viSibility
for safe egress from the driveway at 1810 South Rowland Avenue.
,2.cThat the fence would not be detrimental to the public
heal th and>welfare, and injurious to the property or improvements
in its zone or vicinity.
..,.-,:,3.'. That. the fence would secure an appropriate improvement
of the property.
~ection 3., Based on the foregoing findings of fact we hereby deny
the appeal of the Modification Committee's approval of Modification
M-79-3.
, Section 4. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this
. 'resolution.'
.
I
I
;,
i
,
r.o,
i,'\
j',
'.
-1-
1097
7
.'. '.~~j\!>.
, ,. 1.__ '".....,~ ~::1f
f;. f .
!;
,
.
.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was adopted at
a regular meeting of the Planning Commi8sion of the City of Arcadia
held on March 27, 1979, by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Brink, Clark, Hegg, Perlis, Soldate,
Sargis
, NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Hedlund
-----
ATTEST:
MhAt/;~d
Secretary , .
~; "
\,'
-2-
1097
\
:~,...~
I:' ,,,", '.
!
I
,
I,
!
I
,
,.
t
March 16, 1979
Bud N. Lortz
Assistant Planner
City of Arcadia
240 West Huntington Drive
Arcadia, California 91006
Re:M-79-3
Dear Mr. Lortz:
RECEIVED
MAR 1 9 lSi3
CITY OF AI'ICADIA
PLANNING DEPT.
~.' ~.
Kindly submit in detail and under what code regulations you
'have based your decision to deny my appeal.
V2Y?rulY yours, _ .,
~~1~ a /_C4'H G/
ELOOETH R: TESINS '.
1810 S Rowland
. Arcadia, California 91006
, .
,
i'
!
..'
[", .
"
j'
I.
i
,.,.,"., .-i'
;-.
\::.::',',','..
I.
March 16, 1979
RECEIVED
MAR 1 9 1979
Mr. William Woolard
Director of Planning
City of Arcadia
240 West Huntington Drive
Arcadia, California 91006
Re: M-79- 3
CITY OF ARCAO!A
PLANNING DEPT.
Dear ,Mr. Wollard:
.
I received a letter from the Planning Committee dated March
15, 1979 wherein I was informed that my appeal was denied,
The letter was signed by Mr, Bud Lortz,
I would be interested to know why you did not sign the letter
yourself, Mr. Woolard, since all other correspondence was from
you, : Also I have asked Mr, Lortz to send me in detail the
bases, codes and regulations and other pertinent facts, as to
why my appeal was denied,
It would be appreciated if you would respond by return.
~KrUlY yours, ' ___ .
~Iai~~~T~(~~
1810 S Rowland
Arcadia, California 91006
, ,
!. ' ,cc: ,Executiv:eOffice 60 Minutes
, ,
i
"'.' '
i
I
"
i.'
!
i
". ......
..' "
, .
I
I
.
I
.
.
\: ',:
~
-,.f" CIT'I' COUNCIL
City of Arcadia
DAVID E. PARRY
"'AYOR
ROBERT G. MARCETT
240 WEST HUNTINGTON DRIVE
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA
MAYOR PRO TEMPORI
CHARLES E. GILB
OONALO 0, PELLEGRINO
JACK SAELID
-I
LYLE W, ALBEFtG
CHRISTINE VAN .......ANEN
CITY W.ANAGIi"
CITY CllRK
March 15, 1979
~1izabeth R. Tesins
1810 South Rowland
Arcadia, California
91006
SUBJECT:
Appeal of Modification M-79-3
Dear Ms. Tesins:
The Planning Commission at its March 13, 1979 meeting denied your
appeal of the Modification Committees approval of Modification
M-79-3.
You may appeal the decision of the Planning Commission to the
City Council no later than March 20, 1979 by submitting a letter
of appeal to the City Clerk. A $25 appeal fee is also required.
Please contact me should you have any questions.
Yours truly,
~L~Z~
ASSISTANT PLANNER
BNL/cm
cc: John wilkes
~
AOCRESSE$
P. O. BOX eo
20 W. DUARTE RO",C
P. O. BOX eo
710 S. SANTA ...NITA ...VE,
M.a.'LINO
CITY HALL
LIBRARY
POLICE DEPARTMENT
FIRE DEPARTMENT
'TELEPHONE.S
.46.447' . 681-0276
4~e,71"
447,2121
446,2128
.1000
""006
511006
"'000
-
.
i - ~.
.
,
.. . -".i'
Harch 13, 1979
,TO:
CITY OF ARCADIA
PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CASE NO.:
MODIFICATION M-79-3
PREPARED BY:
BUD N. LORTZ
ASSISTANT PLANNER
This is an appeal to the Planning Commission from a decision of
the Modification Committee approving a modification to allow a
recently constructed six-foot high wood fence to remain five
feet from the street side property line of a corner lot in lieu
of a four-foot high openwork fence allowed. (9283.8.7)
This appeal was filed by Elizabeth R. Tesins, 1810 South Rowland,
the owner of the property immediately south of the subject site.
A copy of Ms. Tesins letter of appeal is attached.
GENERAL INFORMATION
APPLICANT :
John Wilkes
LOCATION:
740 West Lemon Avenue
EXISTING
ZONING:
R-l
EXISTING
LAND USE:
Two single-family dwellings
SIZE:
Approximately 10,600 sq. ft.
SURROUNDING
LAND USE
AND ZONING:
Properties are developed with single-family
dwellings and zoned R-l.
GENERAL
PLAN:
Single-Family 0-6 dwelfing units per acre
. '. ~:~
f ~ 0 .
,
I .
, I
I .
.~., .
. .
, . ,
.
i .
i '
I '
j'
!.,,' ,
I,
l,
I . '
,
to
I
I .
,
,I
!~
it'
'M~79-3
2
,ANALYSIS
The portion of the fence which is in question is located along
Rowland Avenue, a private street. There is no curb, gutter,
sidewalk or parkway along this private street. Eight properties
use Rowland for ingress and egress to their properties.
Staff conducted a study of the visibility of ingress and egress
to the property at 1810 South Rowland.
Using a Ford LTD, staff found that there was adequate visibility
for the driveway at 1810 South Rowland to the north when ~he
back of the car was at the property line (not in the street).
There was no problem with visibility to the south.
FINDINGS
To approve this modification application, the Planning Commission
must find that the request would secure an appropriate improvement,
or prevent an unreasonable hardship, or promote uniformity of
development.
BNL/cm
Attachments
.
.
'"
,'or
J..
, ,
, ._,
\'
'.'. ..'" - ."
"'-'"
, .
, ,
1\
I.
"
i
I:..,
I
, ,
,
i
o ..0
o
o
og~O
~ ~
.... \::)
o ~ ~Q/
, (7~ 7/
"C
(
.., - I ...,
:'" 0 j[: O~:
I SG"; '1.. SlO I
f-----, -----1
I ~; ~ I
O :,. O~~ ~~O"~
"I~ ~ ''"'' ~1(,lrI
o VI.' /. "'10
01 ~ ,U1 10
I 0'''1)
" 1
O L_52_~. ~--~L-iR-\
I I
I " I
I ~ '
O I~- OI~"Q~! 0
I '.VI '
I
."7~p 1 .#/ ~s/ I ""'7,"
r.';(/ I r;.S7/ r7.1I/ I "-'
lOG 50 to c. t 72
I~ LEMON
I
1
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
1
.I
I
:0
,
I
1
I
r-""'---
I'" .
10,
t----.,.-
I " I
. l~
..I I
81 L_
,-
I~
f'UI.I
,"0'
AVENUE.
2!, ."'~ 01"-
~. nOt::I.A (7.J~)f'?.J4J1
o C'l ;0 I /,i 0 I
~ ~!%~// g..t !
r, /';//0 I
O ~ JVR I
. 0 I 0;:; ; ~ tl i.." t I
~ I~ ' iSl
~ ~_.-__--__I," 0 :
'tl 0 I" I
~ I~ . '610
. ~_ _ _ __ ~__:J\<1. \
I I
o g~I~,~-g---~ 0 :
C'\ :" .c:, .;...;
'1 ~c ,GC,
~ '" Par-+: ,-0+ ,+
o I I
,& ':J -
.
o
)':
; ,
" .
t'}...
, :
, .'
, .
;......,
'. .... :",
o
;;0
(7.:'7';
o
3J is
t...
~ VAL
.
."" ,.
.. -
. .,
c:..; ...
'l> d"~
"
.,;
-
-
"
119,~4
:".r.. ,;,:- ... .0
\
I . .3
'" '"
Q" (79 Q~ 0/11
.:.. ~~ ~; <D
co
(7.12)
o
"'
~ -
:, "
...
t"\
~4
- . '\
..'
R
c:;. is ~ ~
''7' (7,-?i ~. 0 ~.-
00, ..'
O' (7.fPO
~J;.; (!~I)
.,
60.00
(72;)i~.lt!/
O "'.
, 0 ".
g I:> "
c: c5 '"
- .,.
... ...
so.N!
51.!C
7C
(7/4',')
8J.C:C
..,
"
--- -
o
--- -
.
....
'"
'5iREE,.
r.. ~OOI 6
SCALE NORTH.
I"-ll::)-~
LAND USE < .ZONING
I'
1 "
f'r
,
, '
l',
,.;
!;
.
,
i:
,Q.': '
..
'..
I'
I
.
.'
I
!
I
, .
I'
, "
~l ,,'
t
.. :::.,AL~. ,"='.f.O":
. ,l),..,.t..~'..
. ..:.\J
,
M l+MRS. ~fJHN/JJjLK.:~f
,'. . ,.- .
HOMe P~NE : 'I'f.6::88""
0V!o. P~OIYE :'14 Q.s:I>S'3tD
- - --,
. -
, . ' " - " .
. . .
, "
.' . OWI&
I '.
." w.4Y
I OA.IiJE ,3S' '/
WIW .
'.. I
. , \ ,
. ,
." '. , ~ l
.1J'~ ,
" ( .
'.. I (
, . ,
. . , . .. .
". '- . . ~
. "
, ,
. , . '1/.{').. , ?lIb
. . .. ,> ."
,
..... . I ~
.
, . .
(
, -
.
. . . -
-
, ,.
/ ,< .....
. .
. . . .
I ~
~
"H /611 / . . ~.. \1'. I
I - . ~
- ','
,. , . 1'>1"
" " , . ~':;.
, f''!a
I , (.. . ~ I
.
. .
I . .
..' < " I
- . . ~
" , - .
. .
, " 141","
.._.~ n, .--
. , ., . . .. .' .~..
t. I , < pltlilE"W,tV . . " 1.. c.~.e
, , I -' . ..
. . -
. - , " '/. . . . . c;.44.4f1t
J.' . - ' ., - . - '. .,-- .
, , ,
IBID n..o I.U t. /4N 0
74,0 - 74 2 '" Ler.lon Ave. ~'-79-3
...
,
100
i' ..
..
;""--,"
,'-,
I'
i ~.,
I {-'
",".
1';".;'.',
I',".,
AEeEIVED
JAN 1 5 t919
I;,."
..
CITY 0' "'''CADI4
lIUIl.D/"'" 1I~"",
". January 14, 1979
Planning Commission
'City of Arcadia
240 West Huntington Drive
, Arcadia, California 91006
Attention: Mr. jWm. Woolard
Director 0 f Planning
.
Gentlemen:
This letter is a request to appeal the decision of the
MQdification Committee pursuant to a hearing on January 9,
1919 in'behalf of Hr. John Wilkes, M-79-3.
I am enclosing a check for 525 payable to the City of Arcadia.
1y yours, _
~--
p ~ ~ <.. v\ / __-~~.(..,...
TH R. TESINS
1810 S Rowland
Arcadia, California 91006
Enclosure
I,
I.
. .
r,'.,
..
, '.'
..... .
. ,.
-,',:.
.,'
t.
.
,
,.
i.
, ,
i'; ",
. ,.
.
,
m emo'lan..dum
'. ,"
Date March 8, 1979
TO:
FROM:
HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING CO~~ISSION
CITY ATTORNEY, CHARLES J. LIBERTO
SUBJECT: M- 7 9 - 3
740 West Lemon Avenue.
Attached are copies of doc~~entation from the City Attorney's
office file offered in contradiction to the testimony and letters of
Elizabeth R. Tesins given at the Planning Co~~ission's Public Hear-
ing 2/27/79 on 101-79:3.
The Los Angeles County Assessor's Records show that 1810 S.
Rowland to be held in the names of Elizabeth R. Tesinsky and Rose
Tesinsky.
Documentation attached consist of:
. 1. Request for information received by City Attorney's office
July 18, 1977 from "Elizabeth R. Tesins".
2. July 21, 1977 response from this office fOD,arding infor-
mation and recommending Mrs. Tesins contact the Planning Department
to measure front setback in anticipation that her neighbor might erect
a fence.
3. Letter received by this office Nover..ber 22, 1978, from
"Elizabeth R. Tesins" reporting her neighbor may have built fence in-
to setback.
~ November 22, 1978 letter from this office advising her
cOffiplaint had been forwarded to Code Enforcement Officer Mr. Basey.
5. November 30, 1978 opinion request of this office by Mr.
Basey whether or not setbacks apply to private streets.
6. December 4, 1978 opinion to Mr. Basey advising that set-
backs apply to public as well as private streets.
7. December 7, 1978 Notice of Violation from Planning Depart-
ment to John A. Wilkes (M-79-3 applicant) requesting fence be removed
~by January 9, 1979.
I'
.
i.
;
"
"
;.'
~
,
.
(
Recommendation:
(H'"
It is recommended that the Planning Commission accept
these documents into evidence for the record during the Public
Hearing on M-79-3 in contradiction to the testimony and letters
of Elizabeth R. Tesins.
CJL/vb
Encls.
cc: Honorable Mayor and City Council.
C~ARLESt6. LIBERTO
C~ty Attorney
, "
I ;
,
I
, ,
;
.
.
!
.
,. '
(H
July 14, 1977
'City Attorney
Arcadia City Hall
333 Huntington Drive
Arcadia, California 91006
Dear Sir:
(
l.
''C.:;;''
RECEIVED
JUL 181977
.en". 0': ,I:.rh..ADIA
'~ITX ArrORNIEY
I would appreciate information on the following:,
The property parallel with mine was purchased by a new owner.
I understand he will be making some improvements, though I do
not know what those improvements will be as yet, I assume one
will be to put up a fence between our properties and I would
l1ke, to know my rights in this respect.
In reading Action Line, I understand that if the fence is
initiated by one party only, the fence must be on his side
of the property line. Is this correct? This is important to
me because my driveway is ,narrow to start with.
Further, is it my right ~o expect that the fence must be
graduated so that I can see onconing traffic j';nen I exit fron
my dri ve~lay?
Your response to these antiCipated problems Viill be
appreciated.
Very truly Y3urs,_
. >........ .,/~ ---"".. ,
'EirZA~E~1 "1l:-'ffSDlS
l810 S Rowland
Arcadia, California 91006
'11"7. ~Oll
:: I
I'
f:
,
Ii
','
I
"
, '
.
.
-,..
,.
.
q("".
l'
July 21, 1977
Mrs. Elizabeth R. Tesins
1810 S. Rowland
Arcadia, California 91006
Dear Mrs. Tesinsl
,Responding to your July 14, 1977 letter , received
, July 18, 1977, I enclose a copy of Arcadia Municipal
Code Sec. 9283.8.7 relating to city fencing require-
ments. If you do not consent to the fence, then it
should be entirely on your neighbor's property.
As you will note from the Section, four foot fences
may extend into the.frontyard but six foot fences
may not. You should contact the City Pl~~ning De-
partment to ascertain the front yard of your neighbor's
property.
Yours very truly,
Charles J. Liberto
City Attorney
CJL:zc
Enclosure
I
.". ,
~ ~
;Q
.
"
; .
.
.
:-
'.
(u
C,.,.,
RE C E ( V E 0
NOV 221978
November 21, 1978
CITY OF ARC"DIA '
CITY A'TIORNEY
City Attorney
City of Arcadia
256 Huntington Drive
Arcadia, California 91006
Dear Sir:
I am a homeowner in the City of Arcadia and I have reason
to believe that my neighbor has built his 6 foot fence too
far out into my front yard.
I would appreciate having someone from the City of Arcadia
coming out to check this matter for me and also to advise
how I may contact the City Council in the matter of inadequate
rebulations pertaining to the particular problems of myself
and my fellow homeowners of this street.
I am not home during the day, but if you will advise when the
man will call, I will arrange to be there.
Sin~erely, .
.-- ? .:;...;.-
C:;r;Ii13'rr{':~iES bs--
1810 S Rowland
Arcadia, California 91006
P.S. Please do not tell me this is a pOlice matter -- it 1s
not, I checked.
~'. .. -.... "'~",,:,'f.r .
f' "'-".S'
I'.~:.
'""~;1~/
c'i!r;cc of th't,
Cily A!I<irnC}'
CHARLES J. LIBERTO
Cil.1I Altn:"cY .
..~, 446-44i1 .
:. LA.: 681.0276
"'I' fAd ..,',
i...:,,, lty 0 rea ;........'. -:'
- t-
V ,,,LA;
. .,
.' ~'
,.}
~', . "
240 WEST HUNTINGTON DRIVE
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006
;, .~.
Nove:rber 22, 1978
Ms. Elizabeth R. Tesins
,1810 South Rowland
Arcadia, California 91006
Dear Ms, Tesins:
This is to acknowledge receipt of your November 22, 1978
letter regarding your neighbors. You are correct in that
this is not a pOlice matter; however, it is a zoning
matter which has been referred to the City's Code
Enforcement Officer, Mr. Basey.
.
You may contact the City Council either by letter or in
person on the first and third Tuesdays of each month at
7:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers during the audience
participation portion of the Council Agenda.
CJL:br
'. ..cc : Mr,. Basey,
i
,.
,
.
'-.
memota;"dum "
......
. '. "
IH!CEfVED,
NO'l301S1G
Dr-Ie ~./3ohp
ro:07'( .4T7b~
FROM: ~. 7: .t3rlse-;
SUBJECT: / ff/O S. ~dL.AND ,4vt!E. .
CITY OF ARCADIA
Cl'I:y. ^rr.O~N"-Y
_ ~GC=
, '
'/J1S .',7ES/r../S (i-Cs'/'\/srcy) ~O#1r'LA/...v~ rr/-4r
-rl-l~ -S/ X ',c~r FENcE OF 7$/0 4/. LE/nDI1./,qv2;.
?UHI c.L/ ,/5 .4z:;>.::;r~ c.eN"r ~ HE-€.. ?,eo,Pe-~7 0-?/eJ)
t!)6sr.!€vC'Tj" #6e.. vl6-V OF -r~AFr:-/c ;7e.~P1 #~
2Je.l'vC::W"'7 VPON Er/7cE€./Ncr rH~ ~/v-4-re=
..:srA&:'ET OF=" ~.wLqN..D /l~. 71/0 d. !.EftlON
;.5 -17 /H'c ~o~eL;~ L&nON /l~. AND
ft?oNL.~N.C> -4 VC=. U/17/-( -r~ ..5/DC: Lor L.//I,/L:!-
mC!.ALL~L, W17/-/ ~wL.,q~O--9vE. rM=- 6~T
;:ii7Vt:c!E. /S-Se:-7.6A-O<... S ~eT P:"40/Yl /~
EPG~ @,c 7H~ ?"c;vem&./7 cPr 7'.4/$ P",ejt/47~
.s/~T. ',,/..5' /T N~~.-?~ -r~r -rH/S
/o/~6~5~7 8/7C-K-- /O~7 ~-"1 T"~'t.
;7/20~7'.' 6N"~',4S ~(//.4-a:? 6/"c ~..e/V'~
L""TS d3( ~,o<f /OR. e-/~. 62.!?'3.9:iJ.
.
-.;;.
\0 ~. ..,. III
.~.'
,..,
",
. '
.
.
'-
,.
~
~
b
.t.
~
l.......'
"
, LEE: \'lA.O,.,J A vb .
,
I
,
\
,
I
I
7Li-o
I C. k:.o"'T
l~ r-6.lc.e
I
I
I
I ~ _ L___
~ I~'-"J
---r-,,;.~w~'
-T~'S PR"tZ.1oF
p:eJU ,S
L} f'ee1' ) ~ ( 0
)
-.... --..--
.=.-~,._.. ----
~~
, ..
'. ,co
m emotariilitm
.;,"
.. ....
.",- ,
Da.u December 4, 1978
. '.'
TO:
R.T.
Basey, Code Enforcement Officer
Liberto; City;,4~y
South ROWland~ue - Fence
FROM:
C.J.
SUBJECT:
1810
,Referencing your recent inquiry, pursuant to Arcadia Municipal
Code Section 9283.8.8, 6ft. fences may not extend into the side yard
required along the side street on a corner lot, however, Arcadia Municipal
Code Section 9283.8.7. allows openwork fences in the side yard required
along the side street on a corner lot if not more than 4 ft, in height.
SUbject property is zone R-l.The R-l regulations, specifically
Arcadia Municipal Code Section 9252.2.5, requires a side yard on the
street side of a corner lot of 10% of the lot width, but not less than
10 ft.. Rowland Avenue is the street side of 740 W. Lemon (Arcadia
Municipal Code Section 9220.,59). The term "street" includes both public
and private streets, such as Rpwland Avenue (Arcadia Municipal Code
Section 9220:57).
. The City Code prohibits any obstacles whatsoever in the street,
parkway or sidewalk, (Arcadia Municipal Code Section 7230),
The property owner at 740 West Lemon should, therefore, be
noticed to remove or reconstruct the fence in accordance with the afore-
described sections.
'-." .
,';
:r:
CJL/vb.
,
'. ':"'1,
..'~
j~
.'
. "'::'
...~
,~;. :' -P;,!;;
~ ~
l:c .
......VOR
City of'~"'~>rcadia
",
[JA"fD E. PARRV
ROBERT C. MARGETT
""
CHARLES E. GILB
DONALD D. FELl.F.GRINO
JACK SAELlD
-I
240 WEST HUNTINGTON DRIVE
ARCADIA. CALIFORNIA
MAYOR PRO T[MPOR[
l.YLE W. ALBF.:IlC
CHRISTINE VAN MAANEN
CITY IWAN"Gt:R
en',," eL[_":
December 7; 1978
File No.: 17-13
5383-24-25
Mr. &' Mrs. John A. Wilkes
740 West Lemon Avenue
Arcadia, California 91006
SUBJECT: Fence in side yard
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Wilkes:
.
It has recently been no~ed that a fence has been constructed
adjacent to your west property line which may be in violation of
Arcadia Municipal Code Section 9252.2.5 that requires a
street side setback on a' corner lot for u fence of 10% of the
lot width, but not lcss than 10 feet. The An:'HJ.i" City Attorney
has ruled that this law is applicable to private streets as
,'well as public streets.
'This letter shall serve as notice that a correction, if need-=d
must be made by January 8, 1979 or you may file a modification
,application requesting permission to retain the fence in its
present location. If you wish to file the modification application,
you should contact Mr. Bud Lortz, Planning Department City Hall,
to obtain an application not later than December 20, 1978.
A reinspection has been scheduled for 10:O~ a.m. on Tuesday,
January 9, 1979, should you have any questions, please fdel free
to contact Mr. Lortz or myself.
,
,,~:~lf(C:;:;:I.lDrtl0~ .
J El,)~r\ I,) WI'I"!'I"
ASSOCIATE PLANNER
cc: Bud Lor~z, As&istant Planner'
Charles Liberto, City Attorney
~
- MAILI.NO
CITY HALL
1..IBR"RY
POLICE DEPARTMENT
. FIRE DEPART~ENT
AODRESSES
P. O. BOX eo
20 w. OVA-R1E ROAO
P. Q. BOX riO
710 S. SANTA ANITA A.VE
01008
DlOOO
DlooG
D100e
TELEPHONES
44e,4411 . 081.02715
4.01'1),7111
447.2121
....e,2128
I
.
,',,"
,
\,''''
,
.,
March 6. 1979,
RECEIV[:D
MAR 8 h,:'1
CITY OF ARCAul..
P~NNING DEPOT.
Arcadia Planning Committee
240 Huntington Drive
Arcadia. California 91006
Attention: Mr. William Woolard.
Planning Director
Re: M-79-3
Gentlemen:
This will confirm my statements made at the Public Hearing on
February 27. 1979. As I advised you at the time. my attorney
is of the opinion that my neighbor. Mr. Wilkes. is in violation
of the city codes as regards to his fence height and he feels.
therefore. that his intervention at this point is unnecessary.
As I explained to the Committee on February 27th. I feel that the
City of Arcadia has been negligent in setting up city codes for
private streets because I corresponded with the City Attorney
and the Planning Department way back in 1977 regarding the need
for same. It would appear that according to Proposition l3. the
city fathers have indeed procrastinated in the establishment of
procedures and in the interpretation of the city codes.
As a result. no restraining order was issued to ~~. Wilkes pend-
ing an investigation and the outcome was Mr. Wilkes' illegal
fence height and obstruction to my front yard.
As a result of this procrastination. I have suffered much abuse in
time and expense. At the inception of r~. Wilkes' intended fence.
scraggly bushes with strong roots separated our properties. Mr.
Wilkes obviously wished to be spared the expense and labor of remov-
ing the bushes and set his own line of demarcation for his fence.
leaving the debris for me to remove at an expe,nse of$lOO for the
removal of the weeds and $240 to asphalt the gap. Mr. Wilkes did not
,compensate me for this expense; yet one member of the r10dification
'Committee insinuated before the hearing officer that I had been at
fault. I warned r~. Wilkes that he was building his fence against
',', city codes 'and gave ,him a copy of code regulations. but he insisted
hecould,do,anything'he wanted.
, By an appeal to the Arcadia City Council. said Council determined
in the latter part of 1978. as confirmed by Mr. Woolard's letter
of December 11. 1978. that the city codes apply to private streets
as well as nonprivate streets. Thus Mr. Wilkes' six foot fence
height is illegal and is in non-compliance with said city codes.
I
,..'
.
t.
~ ~ .
t ~'
j....'...
I)
'. ";;'.
I .'.', "
, , '
,
c:>
["..,...
"
..
, f
, 'Arcadia Planning Committee
: Mr. Wilkes was allowed to appeal for a modification of the rules,
.:'which he did in an ambiguous manner. vleb ster defines modification
, as a change or moderation; Mr. Wilkes did not ask for a change or
'moderation of the illegal fence height, but a right to retain said
: illegal fence height; in fact his illegal fence height exceeds six,
, feet in several areas. 'During the Public Hearing on January 9>>'
1979, two members of the Modification Committee openly supported
Mr. Wilkes' request for retainment of the illegal fence height by
presenting false and misleading arguments on his behalf to. the
hearing officer. One such misleading argument was that the fence
is five feet from the street, whereas the fence at my front yard is
onlY four feet from the redwood strip of the street; further that
a survey of a possible safety hazard had been made from my drive-
way. This is false in that I was at home at the time the survey
was made and there was a plumbing truck in my driveway and no such
survey was conducted. Further, the hearing officer did not appear
to be familiar with Sections 9283.8.7, 9283.8.8 and 9283.5.l of the
Arcadia City Code. I submit, therefore, that the City of Arcadia
and Mr. Wilkes are legally liable for any accidents occurring at the
site of the safety hazard because the City of Arcadia and the City
Attorney have abused their discretion as to what constitutes a
safety hazard. It is also my opinion that the l~odification Committee
is a pUblic body supported by tax money, that I am a member of the
tax paying public and that no objectivity was shown by any member of
the Modification Committee in its decision; that support of Mr.
Wilkes was obvious from the inception of the hearing and that such
lack of objectivity should indeed be the subject to further discussion
with an objective third party.
I request in view of the above facts that a fair and just decision
, now be :made by this Planning Committee and that Mr. Wilkes be re-
.' ,quested to comply immediately to city codes as regards to his
'illegal fence height and encroachment in my front yard, and that
11r.. Wilkes be advised that all bushes and hedges obstructing view
, , are, ,also part of- such compliance. It should be noted also that
,,:,"shouldl1r. Wilkes be allowed to retain his illegal fence height
, '.andencroachment in my front yard, implied license would be given
, 'to" me and other homeowners of this street to build fences of equal
.'height,and obstruction on the parallel side of their properties.
Very truly yours,
i~:~~:~E~~~~~
1810 S. Rowland
Arcadia, California 91006
cc: Arcadia City Council
-2-
I
.
>:
t
,.
, 'bTY COUNCIL
DAVID E. PARRY
. "'''VOIit
'. ROBERT G. MARGETT
MAVOR I"RO Tlloll~O"1:
CHARl..ES E. GILB
DONALD D. PEL.LEGRINO
,
JACK SAEL.ID
I..YLE W, AL.BERG
CITY MANAOER
c....
City of Arcadia
~
240 WEST HUNTINGTON DRIVE "
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA
CHRISTINE VAN MAANEN .
CIT"l' CL_JlIt
",._i.
February 15, 1979
Elizabeth R. Tesins
1810 S. Rowland Avenue
Arcadia, California 91006
Appeal of Modification M-79-3
SUBJECT:
Dear Ms. Tesins:
The Planning Commission at its February 13, 1979 meeting
continued an appeal of the Modification Committee's approval
of M-79-3to February 27, 1979.
Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact
me.
. .':..~,
."
....,
. '.
:, BNL':.kL',',,".
Yours truly,
~~~~
Assistant Planner
'1'"
.f....
,',",." .
CC:,' Johil.Wilkes
~ .' i
MAIL.ING
CITY HALL
LIBRARY
FtOUCE DEPARTMENT
FIRE DEPART""ENT
~
ADDRESSES
P.O, BOX eo snooe
%0 w. DUARTE ROAD
p, O. BOX 00
710 S. SANTA ANITA AVE,
91006
11100D
"'001
TELEPHONES
."'15....71 . 681.0275
..e.',,,
."'.2121
."8.2128
I
.
"
,
I
.~ '"
February 12, 1979
RECEIVED
FEB 1 2 1979
,Mr. William Woolard
'Director of Planning
City of Arcadia
240 West Huntington Drive
Arcadia, California 91006
CITY OF "ReADI"
PLANNING DEPT.
Re: M-79-3
740 W. Lemon
Public Hearing February 13, 1979
Dear Mr. Woolard:
This will confirm our telephone conversation of today wherein
I advised that my attorney has requested that I ask for an
extension of this case to a later date in oraer to allow him
to study the matter and consider new evidence.
The purpose of this letter, therefore, is to ask for such
extension and it is my understanding you will submit it to the
Planning Commission pre-meeting for consideration.
Very uly yours, , ,
~ "- a /_p~~~_ ~)
ELI ETH R. TESINS
1810 S Rowland
Arcadia, California 91006
,.
..
t
February 13, 1979
TO: CITY OF ARCADIA
PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: ELIZABETH R. TESINS
1810 S Rowland
Arcadia, CA 91006
RECEIVED
FEB 1 2 1979 "
em'. 9f' ...~Ol'" '
l'U'>NNING DEPT. " '
CASE
NO. M-79-3
Supplementing my letter of January 14, 1979, I wish to state as
follows:
1. That the modification request requested by Mr. John Wilkes
is ambiguous because it implies protest was made to the location
of the fence from the street side rather than to its height 0 f
six feet;
2. That the six foot fence, height is in violation of Sections
9283.8.7 and 9283.8.8 of the Arcadia Municipal Code, a photocopy
of which is attached. '
~ 3. That the City of Arcadia has abused its discretion as to
what constitutes a safety hazard in that the surveying Ford LTD
staff made its observations on visibility to the north and south
from the street and not from my driveway wherein the hazard would
originate.
i':
4. That I do not have any objections to reaching a compromise with
Mr. Wilkes to cut the fence to five feet in height rather than six
feet. , ,
~-. r/?--- .
',BY ,,' ,~C/r /~
'ELIZA, . TESINS . '!,"
~ ,:. .
"
i.
'cc: CITY ATTORNEY
Arcadia City Council
.Lv t:~ ~~
902 73 s: /
,
I
.
i.
;.'--
'.
<W:TY COUNCIL
DAVID E. PARRY
MAYOA
ROBERT G. MARC!TT
MAYOR fRO TU4POAI:
CHARLES E. GILS
DONALD O. PELLEGRINO
JACt< SAELIO
~
LVI-It W, ALBERG
CrTY M""''''Ol:iIt
January 18, 1979
Elizabeth R. Tesins
1810 S. Rowland
Arcadia; California
91006
Dear Ms. Tesins:
City of Arcadia
240 WEST HUNTINGTON DRIVE
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA
CHRISTINE VAN MAANEN
CITY ClolIU!.
In response to your letter dated January 16, 1979, no Modification
Committee members are attorneys.
ww/cm
MAIL.ING ADDRESSES
CITY H....LL P.O, BOX eo
LIBRAR'f 20 w. DUARTE RO....D
POLiCE OEP"RTtoeEKT P. O. BOX 60
FIF=tE DEPARTMENT 710 S. 6"NTA ANITA AVE.
.
Yours truly,
!JJ~~
WILLIAM WOOLARD
DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
~
."'0<1
01005
01006
Ploo5
TELEPHONES
....0-4471 . oe 1.02:15
....e.'11'
,647.2121
445,2128
.'" ."
',.
January 16, 1979
Jeffrl)Y Hitte
Associate Planner
City of Arcadia
240 \Iest Huntington Drive
Arcadia, California 91006
Dear r.1r. Witte:
In response to your letter of January 12, 1979, I an unable to
tell fron the code regulations if the purchaser or the plUr.Jber
obtains the permit for the raplacBmentof pl~~bin~ fixtures.
It would appear that since the plumber must obtain a one-time
yearly permit" that it is his responsibility to c'I.o so and by
a copy of your January 12th letter to Alcadia PllL~bir.0 and r~' sub-
sequent telephone call to their office, I assuns they will obtain
the permit immediately.
I nif,ht add that I mentioned the natter to the plunbcr himself
and h~ said that he had never heard of an enforcement of these
regulations, possibly because suchrestrictic~s would deter other
conpanies fron locating in the City of Arcadia.
.
AssuninJ; that the ccnmittee menbers ':iilo pursu',d this lin" of
questioninG to no i:1 an ~'1relat.:d r,)att?r at a "ublic ;;:-larin;::
are 1ntzrcsted only in the revenue to th~ City o~ Arcadia, i~
occurs to ne that they did not pursue t21is sane line of qUilsticn-
ing ~iith my neiGhbor, 111'. \'lilkes, v!ho is s.fter all puttin.r; in
extensive renovations to his property.
Please advise me if any of the menbors c;: th8 "odification
Committee ~Iho presided at the January 9, 11)79 hearin" ari!
attorneys and members of the bar association, th~;ir names and'
titles ~'1d whether they are full-time ~mploYees of the city.
:'hanl, you.
verf", tr ly yours,
- --- -
r:;::/ 'L~-f {;/f>~~
- ELI ~ E~H R. TESINS
1810 S ?owland
Arcadia, California 91006
cc: Arcadia City Council
Arcadia Chamber of Commerce
.
',-
.
.,.,....
.,.
~ i'
_L....... L.~.~.
I~~~~--
"
, '..- c-f?' !!:~~'~f4~-~
~r 1'1+ _
" OJ ~"'''' I ~ i." r ,
1 'f 1 ,-/ ,_ 1
~, , I,J '.:.. ;'R ~: ...... -:'t ~ .!.:.:', "
,,,\, -. ~',0: t,-.__. II l'
1..._ - ~_ <Ao 'oN'.~_c'...
. ~~ ,"'" . .-....It'
-~ , . $ :.r,., -..- "", J
'-'--'-:,I'~ 'lr,!f" JI . [.'!.' .1
~.,'" +.. .. ,. ,.. ...... .;;
, ' 'I . ..,..... ,': .
r --. -. .,,. r- ~.
.~ .., ':... ~
,- ,!~ P _ J
~: I f!i <& L'VI~ ~u-:"~'_ ~
j-..j., , ,.p., UN<T~;::r .....'
. :1~W7Jr..~ (~ ~L f_.; - - Ii!
t~~ ~~',,-.).' ~.-b ,.."~ r CUI
~,
,,'-.,
1'.':,
'1....-.
'0;."
001",
'r"'LI"",'--.;
:"'T-,.....'""'''''I..~c....- ~,~ "^"""
'''':;-7..:';.':::..':....
.~_l.-_ot;.......~.
~...."".........""'" -t-=
- -~-~-~wr--' ~~,
',;~~:::;:. '~'R~' rit~;:':-~.
TT~'-"',< 1'1 1-,.."-r6"'".f'~
~':,:,":;>~~,,", ".~l=-'" :.::...., '.' I !!.;~"""""---
.. II
{ "4
!, \t .':, ..-:''':~
::" . . <C ~""T .
:~ ~; ,.J-"~-"'~.~.
; ~.....-
. .....
'I .
~: ~~:~.
'-'--'
-~:;~!:~I:' ;~.,
,._~---c
~':-:.:?~~ ~ ~ .
1 -:
:jf~"r
~: .. I 'I'
"..: Ii I 'i'
~.'li'lj'
~ 't
'----., '.. '. ,
:"'-#_"'- - v--t
.~~
,...........~~I..'::,-~
""~
.)",.
~.-,
...."..
.
.'
!""..1~Y' ,:"~:-',?'.;._~
~':-~',=.!~
"...')'-- .
n
,..":
.~
ffI""-."',t L
!~I,
r ~_.., ....~-....
\, .--.
It.. .
.~.:.~~~~':"~I.
::>f:;-r~,-
"
--"t",i/
!l "'T"",;~ t?E:T^'L "6
'.."
.
.:.
rn
'-',.-
-"~'..
rr
..'
r:-
! ~ I ;
" .hl\
'f'lii
:rQI!
,.' 'j
c~.)
.."',
.....~,.
....,
'.
~JI'W'N'l
.....,i"'..J.....1'ft'
.,
';;1,
.
..~~'
_..:k4;;!':t',
1.1
l.~
~
.-t.";
~;.'
,':t.-..'
.'
- ~~,
-..'
."""- . -~.I' ..]'>-'-"'1'">
-,
-.y.~...,..
-:. ~...' ~. - ~
" . "....p.-----.
'''T"-''-''~'''r'~~!':...
.-"...-.. .
.
....._,~-~....-
,.....,-
,
.
File No. ~J4..
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA
A. Description of project: -TO ~Y.T A 4-uN,rr
B. Location of project: -1)5> t;L ~ ~~-r
.
C. Name of applicant or sponsor:
D. Finding: This project will have no significant effect upon the
environment within the meaning of the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970 for the reasons set forth in the attached
Initial Study.
E. Mitigation measures, if any,' included in the project to avoid
potentially significant effects:
Date: ~bl~ t:~ e7~
I
. .l!.b-lU-1Jv-LtlYl
.
AYj'..c,"lAJ.rr ~
Title
Date Posted:
.
.
.
File No. L:.U.? 70) - 14-
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of Proponent LOJI4';:) J. " JAN):!. B. ~L-e
2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent JO?z.. eu"'lbl'-' -CJ\}./ 'flK.t-
A~/.. LA. CU~
.
~:#: ~rsP'l-1J;>B~
B. ENVIRONMENTAL I~ACTS
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets.)
1. !!!J!l.' Will tlM propo..l r"ult tft:
.. UIl'table .arth con4itioll' or In
Qllanq" in 9eoloqlc IllMtructOU..)
!!! ~
!!!. !!!m!
/-
./
~
~
/
/
./
b. DhrupUona, duplac:_nu. ecw-
p.lction or OVlreovarln<jl of the :r01.1?
1:, CllUlqa in topoqu.phy or ql"ounlS
'lId.~ relief f.,t.IU"?
,,", SlIbI;t.anthl ...dueelon in the
..-.wIt of ...tar atMlYt.. ..".Uabl,
for puhUc:wuar .uppUes?
1. I~llre of people or property
to waul' relAted ""'I'd, nldl..
flood-ln'l?
4. Plant. Life, Will tM propcM.l r..ult In:
., Ooaft\la in tn. 4t_nity of .~c:i...
or n\lllloer of &II)' .pede. of phntl
(lnc:llJdin9 tt.... IhrUa, 91'.... c~.
.1c:ratlon Uld IoqUolUe planUI?
b. ..,sucU"" of t.lM n...n of any
unlq\le. ru'e or 1ft4aa9.r.-d apeci..
of plUlU?
c, Intl'Odll,,:UOClOf n_lJPeCl.. of
pl.n.tl ~nto .n .rea, or r.,ult 111 .
toarri~r to the nOl'Sal npl.nh~t
ofexutlnq.p.";1..?
..,/"
/
/
ll. Th. cltI.tn>ctlO!l, eover1nq or
.-olllf1culO!l of any QlI1q" 9eol09:lc
or p!ty,ical f.ltun,?
.. MY lncr.... 1ft ..1nd or ...t.r
.roei<m of .oil.. dtlwr Oft or off
the dte?
t, Ch&Dq.. In .1lt.tl.on" depoeitlon
or .roe1oa wb1ch _, .-ollify the
ch&NO.l ot . riy.r or .tr...,
:~Ol=-:~:.~~' ~~:~. .:r .:~~:~~.~~
lend.lid.., In>d.Ud.s, qrolln4 fdhn.
Or su.U.r ba,.ards7
s,. 1'.n111141 Lif., lO'il~ the propon.al r.sult
Inl
/
.I, Chan9a 1n th', diyOtn.ity of speeiu.
orn~u()!a"ysp.ci.aotanl...h
(birds. tand..nl...'.lncludlnqreptll.s.
thh a.~~ shdlh~h, banthie or9Iltll_.
InLeet.or.io;r:.;faun.l?
/
/
/
./
;::
/
f
2. M!:, .111 tho! proposal n.ult 1ft,
a. Sub&t&lltlal air ..i..ioy or
det.rlo,r.t1_ of .-i.nt alr qu.ality?
~
b, Jled\l~ion..1 th."~.n of '''y
W11Cf\ll;. rara or .Del..,.,..recl spec".
cf ...1_h?
b, 'the c;~.tio" at abj..,U_Able
odora?
c, Alter.tioa.ofdr_nt,
_l,tun or t....r.tu.r.. or 'Il)'
~e in cU_t... dtbar loedly
or req1-.11y?
),~. wiUthepropooJdnsult1no
/
c;. Introd\K'tln~. of. _ .peein of
a..l..1. lnto an.ra.. or n..,lt 110
a birder to tM 1L!9r.Uon or _....
_ntot I.R1a&h?
d. Det.nor.u,on to .anting wildlife
hebit.t:
6, ~:ob., W111 tilt! pnlpOaal ra'<l.lt 1:11
.. Cbanq.. 111 curr.nu or the COur..
otdinct.10Jlaf",.t.r_.._nuin
h'a.h ..at.r.'
~
::::
/
,. l-llui U1>e. Will thoe prClpOllal ....ult in
~n~jd,;t.rat,lonofth.
praSC"t ..r pl~,.",d t.nll Ua of an ......,
b, 0l<lll9" in ~orpti_ raua.
drain... ~tt"'Pla. or tba rat. and
-.-nt of aurfece ...tar runotl1
'. IDCr".... 1ft ..xl.tlft'l MIl.. lltVtll.1
b. bpoaun ot peopl. to ........
olOh.l_h?
c;, Alt.ratlolUl to tM COU...a or
n_ of flood ...t.n'
1. ~~~~&ftd....el~:ht :;I'~l;Z:,Propoaa1
4. ~.lnth'_\lfttof,urfac.
...ter ill &II, ...t..r body'
.. DhcM....i..to .urf.c. ...ten. or
1.. any altar.tion of .url.c. ",.t'r
quaUty, IftC:luclin'l bllt not Uait'd to
t.llp.u~.tQr., dla.olye4 oX)''il.ft or
turbi41ty7
!. Alt.ration of the dir.ction or
reta of fl_ of '1roun4 ...t.rd
9. ChIll9' ift the q......ntlty of 9rQQnd
...t.n. aither thro..,h 41r.ce .44itiOlla
or ..ltlld.r_&la, Oil" thrCN9h lftt.rc,ptlOll
of &lOr ~l1if.r by c:\It. or .llC,,'ntiona1
/
./
,. ;,atvr"l hp.,urc,'.. lIIil1 the propo..l
.r~.ult in'
.. Inlre..1t in tll. nUl of \l.a. of .ny
natu~.l resourca.?
/"
/
be, S@.untl.l depl.tion at '"Y
no..r.n....4I>1.. ...tur.l r..ourea1
/
-1-
10.
Jl.hlr. of 1IDan., 1)0.. thl pr~d
lnwlI," I rlak of .... Ixplo.ion or
the 1'.1.... of hl.arc1ouI IllNc&nc..
Unclvdln9. tout. not H.Hed to, oil,
pecnlcllM1, ch..J.cah Dr ndiatio,,)
11'1 eM ,vant ot a" .~idolnt.or
upset cClndlUONI?
m !U!! ..!!2..
/
.
11, ~:\lt:~:l~.1f~~~t~u~f~:~:~:;~
or 9rowth nt. of the b_ ~uh-
UOIO Of &Il Uld
/
./
12.
::~~:4 ~~n~ o~r::::~ :trlet
d_4forldcUtion&!I\o...1r\9?
u.
1'ranl_ctIUonlClrcllhtlDll,
tM propo.u ",'IU to 1n,
1'111
I, Geroarltl.OIl of lw.unU.l addi-
tionel vehicular -._U
b, UfloU _ U.hUn9 p.rkinq
tecU! tt.. or .s-.Dd for new p.rkin",
c. SIlbltuLUd I.tap..:t. \IilQ&\ u.lul.f'4
traupOctlUllIl .y.t_l
d. AltlnU_. to pr"'l'It patt.m.
of cbcUhtiOll or _Ilt of potOph
and/or 'JOO4s?
/"
/
/
/
/
./'
t1, AltlnU_ to "Iurbo".., nil
... dr tuftle?
t, 1ner.... in tuffle hnarh to
_tor ...-fIlel... bleyclhtl or
,..wltr1.,..?
14, 'lIbl1c .'n'1"', Will the propo..i
....v. aft .rr.ot. upon. or c"lIlt 1n .
nMd for n_ CK dtend 9_~nhl
""1_' 1ft U'f of ~ foll._i"'9
,nu,
~
~
/'"
~
/
I, Firl prcK.C!'tl0ll1
b, Po1J.~ prot'e'U_1
e. Se:bOOla7
d. '1.I'IuIorotMr",~I'..t.1_1
f_iUti.a'
a. llaint____ of public fao111-
tl..,illoCl_ift9~?
f. OUlIII'.....~nUl..l"I'l_?
.
u. !e!!D:, W111 the pr05'o..l I'..olt 11..
., tI.. of aub.tlUltld _unta of
fII.l 01' .n..I'9)'?
b. Sub.tlUltid lneA'" in "-no!
\IPOA u1tlUII9 .000c.. of "'.1'9)', 01'
""i!lliA tM ....l~t of _
a~Of'DII.I'9)'1
iat.1u=. Will t.I:l. pl'opo.d ",'\Olt
. f__.,.at_.ol'
....t..tid dtU'.t1._ to tll. follaw-
1n9 OUliU..1
~
?:::
~
:;..--
./'
u.
.. '~l'o.rn.t\l..n19...7
b, ec.-un1oat1.one .y.t_,
e. W.UI'?
d. ......... _ npUc tUlU?
.. .~ vatU' 4ra1A-i.?
f. IoHd ...t. aMI 41asoo-al1
17. :'u::ic..t:~"'. W111 the propoed
a, Cr._ci_ of My IMdtll halu(l o:r
pot...ti_l "-lth "''''&I'd leac:.llllSJ.nq
_cal ro..lth}7
b. CxplMo.n at peclpl. to poc.nthl
_.lth paauu'
/
~
.
Date AlJbl)e::>T Z-~ ~
I
!!! !!!!!! .a
11. Auth.tiCII. W11l tile propo..l ....olt
111 Ule OD.lructl_ of Aft)' .__10
vhu Ot vi_ open to the public, or
v111 the propoll.l n.w.t ln the /
"r..Uon of .... .eat.Il.Uc.lly off....i_
.1c. open to public v1_?
". kecn'llon, 11I111 the propoeal r..""lt
in All Ullpaet upon the qIMlitl' or /""
IjIlAlltityofexietift'Jrecn.ciOlOal
opporllll!olti..?
". Itrdleoll"iC'l{"htoriC'l, .ill th.
propoa. r..o l in an .It.r.ti_ of
. ai\ln1fic.nl udl".olO'Jic.l or ./
bhtoried .ite, Itl"\lC!tve, ob1.ct
orbll11d1"91
a. Ilandatol'Y rincli!iJI of licrn1ficanee.
., DOe' tne pro eet ,,,'" tM poUnti.l
to de9racle the qulh)' of tIM .nvi..-nt.
llIb.unthll)' rll4_ the b.1Ut of .
fhh Dr wild11fe .,.el.., calli' . fi.b
or v11dlif. popllhU_ to drop bile-
.elf.I\IlItdllift9 l._b, thr.at... to
.!lain.te . platll or aniNl ~ity.
rll4l1_ the n...r or rut.rlct tM ran.
of . rare Of elllUn9"l'Id plUlt or .,,1...1
01' diairw.u illporun.t'''lIIpluof the /
..jar poarl.ocU of C.Utorn.1. Ilietory
or pnhhtory1
.. Doea the project ".W1 tM poten.t1l1
to .ctoi...... .bort-t..... to the cl1eadVUlU"
of lan<J-t.... I1I.vl~ntal 9O'1I? "
-.bort.u... i..-t 011 tlMl 'n.vi~t
i. one whlctl _clln in . rd.ti_l)'
brief, definlti..... pII'ied of ti_ whU. .,/'
10ft9-t'l1II illlP'cu wiU .ndlUe..ll into
th.fut"re,)
.. Doe. the proiect h._ illp.lcU
vhim.n individIHUy l1ail.d, bill
c'-Il.au._1.y CClI\dlSeru1.a? V.. ;orojllc:t
..y illplet. _ tvo or _1'1 ..p,arate
n._ree. wl\ere t:!l. ia",.ct 011 ..ch
reeO<u'ce 11 rll.ti...l)' a_U, bUlvlMln /
the .ffect of t:!l. total of U\()a' l.11paoet..
Drlth.envir_lltilaivnificUlt.)
d. Doea the project hava ..vir_nt.l
efhetl whim will calIA. .ubaU.n.tial
.d.,..... .ff.eu on h...., bein.9a, dtl'ler y
di..."ul'Dr indirectly?
.. DlaCUSSICIl or DY'IJOIMEftAL I1/1.LQll7'JCIl
D. N'l'EaKIIlATICIl
(to _ eCllll'I.ud by the L..d Atj.ncy)
of t.l\1. h.lti.al. ....l_lt.__
I Hnd tII. pr~d proj.et COULD !tOT h...... a .ivni!lClUt
.ff.ct. on t.be 'nvl~llt. aMI . JlBGATIV! DECI.AIlATICIl
will bI pr.pared.
o I find th.t dtholJ9h t!wI propoelld projeet CO\Ild h...... a
.i'fllIHc.n.t .ft.ct on. u.. ."vir_nt., t.ben wiU not
be . 1i9nUielUlt .ffect in tllil e... bee'II'. the uti9'U_
""""1'.. de.crlbad on Ul .tt.chll4 ah_t b...... been .dded to
th. projeet. J\ NIGATIV! DU:Io.\MTI(III VII.!. H PllEPAIlED.
01 Hnd th. prOpOMd pro,a-et IUlY h...... . d9niUcant .ffect
on the .nvir_nt. and ~ arvl..x!:lfT1t1. IJIG'ACT aPOaT 11
reqllind,
(lL 4.J.!/fjJ~
igna ure)
-2-
.
File No. Wy 7'L:.L4-
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM
A. llpplicant' s Name: -1:J.F.Le. LOU I ~ JJ JA/'J €. 8
,
Address: --1032. ~~L.OW 1'1 A/~ ) AR.CAO/A.. C.A , ~'OC"
B. Property Address (Location): lJ 5 EL Do fADD ~ ~
AReA OIA. c.A. Q 100,"
C. General Plan Designation: JiQJJ]pu; ~A f'w/ I L\J U t;F.
D. ZOne Classification: _I<. ~
E. Proposed Use (State exactly what use is intended for the property, i. e.. type,
acti vi ties. employment):
4 lHJIT AeMrr'.U;NT au.iLJ)/Nq.
.
F. Square Footage of Si te :
!lOOo ~uAR.E ~b r
G. Square Footage of Existing Buildings:
1. To Remain: -()-
2. To Be Removed: -AJ,.J.. {;;X~~
B. Square Footage of New Buildings: ~~b~ ~UAI2€. fte-r
I. Square Footage of Buildings to be Used for:
1. Commercial Activities:
2. Industrial Activities:
3. Residential Activities: --4~"o
Number of units: 4-
J. On a separate sheet, describe the following:
.~l.
~ 2.
The environmental setting of the project site as it exists.
The proposed alterations to the project site.
3. The use and development of the surrounding properties.
-1-
"
Environmental Information Form
.
K. Check the appropriate answers to the following questions.
Yes No
1. will the proposed project result in a substantial alteration
of ground contours and/or alteration of existing drainage
pattern?
~
2. Will the proposed project result in a change in groundwater
quality and/or quantity?
x
3. Will the proposed project result in an increase in noise,
vibration, dust, dirt, smoke, fumes, odor or solid waste?
.x.
4. Will the proposed project result in the use or disposal of
potentially hazardous materials?
x
5. Will the proposed project result in a substantial increase
in demand for municipal services and/or energy consumption:
x
Explain in detail any "YES" answers to the above questions on additional sheets.
L. Provide any additional information which would elaborate on the potential
environmental consequences resultant from the proposed project.
.
M. Certification. I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the
attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial
evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements and information
presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Date. .Au~()c;" 20) /'l7t:f
ure of Applicant
6,~
.
-2-
.
.
.
.'
,
ltNl/tR.~/O-{E.NTAL l~fOR.HATlO~ Fe:lre..~
J . @ T1-IE E-/J V I eD1JHEf\JTAL SGTll /J q 6) f=- 11 S' EL.. Do I2,A DO
~ow lS A.'J OL.D 'SJ tJqLE FAHlC)/ OWELLltJ~
WIll-! Pooe. PARt;/)J~ A~l) f<.U10 DOWN
SHAG~ orJ f<.&Ae ~F PflDPGe.TV.
(j) WE PWI'OSE TV RE;f-<OIJ€ TI1€ OSI t0qLh ftt)OSE
AtJO SHAc.,K) T}lE1J 11) COrJSTRuCT A 1WC>-
STl)(<.'f) 4 UNl; AP,AItTHf;tJr BU/LOI~~ ~r
~ ~ CO f.J DD H / t.J I U M '
~ 1Z' TIlE wfST (FA:./1-Jq. RRS7 AVE:/JUE) 1-:,
doH HE::R.C/AL. Ok) TH E, STRE-G-l eEL 'OOeAOO)
A1<E VAR.IOUS 5/NqL€ t ~ULTlPu:. 'F-AHIL'j
D UJf::u.. uJq '::> .