The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About0990 '. - ~ ,., ~. '. ,- /--~ ~ '. ,- . ;:,. . . .\ RESOLUTION NO. 990 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA DENYING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A BOARD AND CARE FACILITY AT 716-728 WEST CAMINO REAL AVENUE. WHEREAS, on May 23, 1977, an application was filed by Orlando Clarizio to construct and operate a board and care facility, Planning Department Case No. C.U.P. 77-11, on property commonly known as 716-728 West Camino Real Avenue, more particularly described as follows: 716 West Camino Real Avenue: Lot starting on the south line of Camino Real Avenue, commencing east thereon 396 feet from the northwest corner of Lot 1, Block G of Santa Anita Company's Tract, thence east on said southerly line 714 feet, thence southerly. 720-728 West Camino Real Avenue: westerly 396 feet of Lot 1, Block Company's Tract, Map Book 6, page East 132 feet of the G, Santa Anita 137. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on said matter on June 14, 1977, at which time all interested persons were given full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the factual data submitted by the Planning Department in the attached staff report is true and correct. SECTION 2. This Commission finds: 1. That the density is not appropriate for the neighbor- hood and is too dense for the R-3 zoning. 2. That the development is too dense for the subject site. -1- 990 ,- . . . - ;; 3. That there is insufficient parking. 4. That there is no justification for granting the increased building height and the height requested is inappropriate for the area and the zoning. 5. That there is a minimal amount of open and recreational space in relationship to the density. 6. That the proposed buildings are too close to the street. 7. That this conditional use permit could be detrimental to the public health and welfare and injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity. SECTION 3. That for the foregoing reasons, this Commission denies a conditional use permit as requested by the applicant. SECTION 4. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a copy to be forwarded to the City Council of the City of Arcadia. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Arcadia held on the 28th day of June, 1977, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Huddy, Kuyper, Perlis, Reiter, Sargis, Clark NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Hegg 7P&7 Chairman ATTEST: jJ/~A/'~d Secretary -2- 990 .. '. . June 14, 1977 TO: CITY OF ARCADIA PLANNING COMHISSION FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT CASE NO.: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 77-11 PREP ARED BY: DONNA L. BUTLER ASSISTANT PLANNER GENERAL INFORMATION . APPLICANT: Orlando Clarizio LOCATION: 716-728 West Camino Real REQUEST: Conditional use permit and modifications to con- struct a 108-unlt board and care facility for well, aged persons EXISTING LAND USE AND ZONING: SIZE: Two vacant lots zoned R-3 81,400 square feet (1.87 acres) FRONTAGE: 140 feet on Baldwln Avenue 204.28 feet on Camino Real Avenue SURROUNDING North: mixed residential and vacant land, R-3 LAJ'ID USE A and C.Q AND ZONING: South: convalescent hospital, R-3 East: service station, realty and mixed residential uses, C-2 and R-3 West: mixed residential uses, R-3 and R-2 GENERAL PLAN: Multiple Family Residential . MODIFICATIONS REQUESTED: 1. Request a 35-foot high building in lieu of 30 feet allowed. :' " . . . C.U.P. 77-11 2 2. Request a maximum of 189 beds in lieu of 101 beds allowed. 3. Request 55 parking spaces in lieu of 95 required. 4. Request 3-story buildings in lieu of 2-story buildings allowed. HISTORY: The applicant has proposed several previous projects combining the expansion of the existing convalescent hospital and construc- tion of a board and care facility. Previous projects were C.U.P. 66-5, C.U.P. 66-17, C.U.P. 67-2, C.U.P. 67-7 and C.U.P. 75-4. C.U.P. 75-4 was approved by the Planning Commission on May 13, 1975. Original plans submitted were for a l74-bed (93-unit) facility with 38 parking spaces. This development included the property at 734 Camino Real, but did not include the property fronting on Baldwin Avenue. The plans were revised and resubmitted to include the property fronting on Baldwin Avenue. Said plans contained 106,912 square feet of lot area. This proposed board and care facility contained 68,245 square feet with 152 beds (91 units) and 76 parking spaces. The applicant proposed three 2-story buildings with one additional story below grade in the north wing. The maximum building height was 30 feet. The density for this proposed project was 1 bed per 703 square feet of lot area. SPECIAL INFORMATION FOR PROPOSED PROJECT BUILDING INFOR}1ATION: Size: 75,704 square feet excluding covered parking 5,904 square feet covered parking area 81,608 square feet total building area Number and Size of Units: 108 units with 189 beds (8 VIP units with approxi- mately 514 square feet; 100 units with approximately 362 square feet) Building A is 3 stories (2 above grade). a dining room, kitchen, recreation area, fitness room, crafts rOOm, and equipment The first floor contains 15 guest rooms, The second floor contains 16 guest rooms The lower level contains laundry room, physical and storage rooms. entry, lounge and offices. and the business offices. Building B is 3 stories. The lower level contains 15 parking spaces, a lounge and 9 guest rooms. The first floor contains a lounge, refreshment and housekeeping room and 17 guest rooms. The second floor is a duplicate of the main floor.. (Total: 43 guest rooms) c . , C.il.P. 77-11 3 . Building C is 3 stories. The lower level contains 12 parking spaces, storage room and 5 guest rooms. The first floor contains a lounge, refreshment and housekeeping room and 13 guest rooms. The second floor is a duplicate of the main floor. (Total: 31 guest rooms) Building D is 2 stories and contains 3 guest rooms on the lower level and a trash and storage area as well as loading space on the first floor. Although the application indicates 108 units, according to the plans, 109 are shown. HEIGHT AND ELEVATIONS: The applicant is requesting a building height of 35 feet (3D-foot building with a 5-foot parapet). The R-3 Code allows 30 feet maximum building height. The lower level on Buildings A and B will be located below the Camino Real grade. The first floor level of Buildings Band C will be approximately 4 to 7 feet above the Baldwin Avenue grade. ~ The applicant proposes to design the building similar to the previous conditional use permit with wing walls along the Camino Real and Baldwin Avenue elevations. The wing walls as well as the parapet will encroach more than the 30 inches allowed by Code into the required setbacks. The plot plan does not include a porte cochere along Camino Real. The elevation for C.U.P. 75-4, which was submitted as part of this application, shows a porte cochere on the Camino Real elevation (Sheet 5). PARKING, INGRESS AND EGRESS, AND LANDSCAPING: 95 parking spaces are required by Code (1 parking space per each two beds). . 55 parking spaces are provided. Open parking is 10 feet by 20 feet. The covered parking is 9 feet by 20 feet. This is only 58% of that required by Code. 27 spaces will be located under Buildings Band C; 28 spaces will be located along the southerly property line. Ingress will only be from Camino Real. Egress will only be from the driveway on Baldwin Avenue except for the loading and delivery parking which may exit onto Camino Real. A 5-foot wide landscape buffer is proposed along the westerly and southerly property lines adjacent to the driveway and . . . . C.U.P. 77-11 4 parking area. There is a 7-foot grade difference between the proposed board and care facility and the convalescent hospital to the south. Also there will be a zero to 7 foot grade difference between this facility and the property to the wes t. A wall exists along the southerly property line and the applicant is proposing to construct a 6-foot high block wall along the westerly property line. LOT COVERAGE: DENSITY: Approximately 60% of the lot is covered with ~uild- ings (38%) and parking (22%) There will be 1 bed per 430 square feet of lot area; Code allows 1 bed per 800 square feet of lot area. This is 42% above that allowed by Code. RECREATION AREA: Outdoor recreation Buildings A and B. in this area. area will be located between A swimming pool is proposed NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES: ANALYSIS The applicant has indicated there would be a maximum of 10 - 12 employees. A board and care facility is a permitted use in an R-3 zone. Section 9275.9 of the conditional use permit procedure allows "waiver of requirements" and reads: "Upon a showing by the applicant and a finding by the Planning Commission that any such regulation is inappropriate or inappli- cable either to the intended use of the property or to the property itself or to adjacent property the Planning Commission may, in granting a conditional use permit, recommend that any regulations specified in this Division be waived and the City Council may without the necessity of a public hearing waive any such regulation." The applicant is requesting waiver of the following requirements (see attached application): 1. Section 9275.5.3. Lot area and density requiring 1 bed per 800 square feet of lot area. Request is for 1 bed per 430 square feet of lot area. 2. 9275.5.4. 2 beds. Parking requirements. 1 parking space for every Request is for 1 parking space per 3.44 beds. C.U.P. 77-11 5 . If the Planning Commission determines that the proposed project is designed in a manner which makes the density and parking regulations inappropriate, such a finding should be made and a recommendation for a waiver forwarded to the City Council. It is the Planning Department's opinion that the request for a 35-foot high building will not be detrimental to properties to the south or west. The applicant has compared this facility with the retirement hotel at 753 West Duarte Road. A comparison is as follows: Retirement Hotel Board & Care Facility Lot Area 32,847 sq. ft. 27,648 sq. ft. 42% e.xc. parking 72% inc. parking 81,400 sq. ft. 81,608 sq. ft. 38% exc. parking 60% inc. parking Building Si ze Building Lot Coverage . # of Units Proposed 60 108 Unit Sizes Average 165 sq. ft. 1 unit per 547 sq. ft. Average 362 sq. ft. 1 unit per 746 sq. ft. Density Parking 23 1 per 2.61 rooms 55 1 per 1.98 rooms The applicant has indicated this facility would be operated in a similar manner as the Arcadia Retirement Hotel. Only ambulatory, well, aged people are permitted in a board and care facility. A board and care facility is not licensed for health care. . This proposed board and care facility has a greater density than that of the previous application. (Proposed: 1 guest room per 746 square feet of lot area; C.V.P. 75-4: 1 guest room per 1,175 square feet of lot area). This proposal does exceed the parking and density requirements which were applied to the retirement hotel. (See above table) Because of the grade differences in the southerly and westerly properties, the 5-foot landscape buffers adjacent to these property lines should be provided at the same grade as adjoining properties and a retaining wall constructed adjacent to the proposed parking area and driveway. C.U.P. 77-11 6 . Because the architectural renderings do not coincide with the plot plan, new architectural renderings and a revised pl?t plan should be submitted to the Planning Commission for Its review and approval prior to issuance of any building permits. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a lot consolidation should be filed and recorded in the County Recorder's Office. Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, the Planning Department has prepared an intial study for the proposed project. Said initial study did not disclose any substantial or potentially substantial adverse change in any of the physical conditions within the area affected by the project including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, ambient noise, and objects of historical or aesthetic signifi- cance. Therefore, a Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project. Before the Planning CommIssion ta~es action on this project, the Commission should "move to approve and file the Negative Declaration and find that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. . RECOMMENDATION The Planning Department recommends approval of C.U.P. 77-11 subject to the following conditions: 1. Conditions as outlined in the attached report from the Department of Public Works shall be complied with to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. 2. A modification shall be granted for 55 parking spaces in lieu of 95 required by Code. All parking spaces shall comply with the commercial parking requirements as per Section 9269 of the A.M.C. 3. A modification shall be granted allowing a maximum of 189 beds in lieu of 101 beds allowed (108 units maximum). 4. A modification shall be granted to allow the porte cochere to encroach into the front setback on Camino Real. The location of the porte cochere shall be subject to the review and approval of the Planning Commission and shall be included on the revised plot plan and architectural plans. . 5. A waiver of A.M.C. Section 9275.5.3 (density requirements) and Section 9275.5.4 (parking requirements) be granted by the City Council pursuant to A.M.C. Section 9275.9. . . . C.U.P. 77-11 '7 6. Revised plot plan, architectural and landscape plans shall be submitted to the Planning Commission for its review and approval prior to the issuance of any building permits for this project. 7. Buildings A and B shall not exceed 35 feet in height as measured from the top of finished curb elevation along Camino Real Avenue to the highest point of the roof parapets. 8. Building C shall not exceed 35 feet in height as measured from the top of the curb elevation along Baldwin Avenue. 9. Building setbacks along Camino Real Avenue and Baldwin Avenue shall not be less than 25 feet nor shall architectural projections enc~D~ch more than 30 inches into said setbacks. 10. The landsc~ped areas between the proposed parking and drive- way areas, and the adjoining properties to the south and west shall be substantially at the grade of said adjoining properties with retaining walls constructed between the landscaped areas and the proposed parking and driveway areas. 11. ' A lot consolidation shall be filed and recorded with the County Recorder's office prior to issuance of any building permits. 12. Fire protection shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Fire Chief. 13. Signing shall comply with R-3 regulations. DLB/at Attachments . . . June 8, 1977 TO: PLANNING DEPARTMENT FROM: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS SUBJECT: C.U.P. 77-11 -- 716-728 W. CAMINO REAL The following are recommended conditions of approval: 1. Pursuant to Section 66424 of the California Government Code if real property is merged, Division 2, Subdivisions, of said Code shall be complied with. From a review of the plot plan there appears to be a need to file a parcel map to consolidate two lots into one lot. 2. Construct P.C.C. curb, gutter, and sidewalk on Camino Real and sidewalk on Baldwin Avenue in accordance with plans to be approved by the Director of Public Works. 3. Grading and drainage shall be in accordance with plans to be approved by the Director of Public .Works. ~//~ CHESTER N. HOWARD Director of Public Works CNH:ms , , . ,~ ,L-A&;;z.s , APPLICATION FOR COl'lDITIONAL USE PER:.: ::,' . FILE NO. C".(J,r 7.7-// TO THE CITY PLANNING CO~~ISSION: 1. APPLICA1.'1T NA1'.E Orlando C1arizio ADDRESS 1601 South Baldwin Avenue, Arcadia, California 91006 INTEREST IN PROP:;;"TY Owner TELEPHONE NUMBER 445-2170 2. PROPERTY OWNER NAMZ Same as above ADDRESS DATE PROPERTY ACQUIRED 1968 TELEPnONE NUMBER 3. PROPERTY ADDRESS <.. LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Include Lot & Tract Number, Metes & Bo~~ds) . 716 W. Camino Real: Lot startinq on the south line of Camino Real Avenue. commencinq east thereon 396' from the northwest comer of Lot 1, Block G of Santa Anita Company's Tract, thence east on said southerly line 74'. thence southerly. 720.,728W. Camino Real: East 132' of the westerly 396' of Lot 1, BlockG, Santa Anita Company's Tract, Map Book 6, Paqe 137 . ~'_.. Total area 81,400 square feet 5. DEED RESTRICTIIDNS None 6. REQUEST (Use this space ONLY to state exactly what use is intended for the property. If yo~ are applying for an eating establishment, restaura~t or placo of assembly, please include seating capacity,) Applicant proposes to construct a new retirement residence of 108 units ~./? A..vn r"-AP...C" /.;'~ LJa:6 ~ . ., <7. . PREREQUISITE CONDITIONS: (The LA\1 REQuIRES 'ch<l'cthe co:-.(;;. 'cions set forth below be clearly established before a Co~~itiotial Use Permit ~ b~ granted.) . EXPLAIN IN DETAIL WP.EREIN YOUR CASE CONFOR.V.S TO TIlE FOLLO\lING FIVE CONDITIONS: A. That the granting of such Conditio:1al Use Permit will not be"detrimental to the p~blic health or welfare or inju~iGus to the property or improvements in such zone or vicinity~..... in that said residence will be located adjacent to either commercially zoned property (on the north and east), a convalescent hospitul on the south und will be separated from R3 property on the east ny an undevelopeQ lot ot approxltl1utely uu teet wwe extending the length of the property. That said units are of sufficient size and provide for such adequate .park.mg as Wll1 create no detnment to adjacent propen:y, as more particularly set forth under" additional information" hereinbelow. B. That the use applied for at the location indicated is one for which a Conditional U~e Permit is authorized...... v,c<. , . C. That the site..for the proposed use is adequate in SiZ8 and shape to aCCOll\l11odate said use, and all yards, spaces, walls, fences, parki~g, loading, landscaping and other features required, to adjust said use with the land and uses in the neighbor- ,hood..... . D. That the site abuts streets and highways adequate in width and pavement type to carry the kind of traffic generated by the 'proposed use...... 7W/:> U-jIOP .ci77'~~ /.M///VL) /?-'=V . AND flA.UArLVA/ .AVB/~ . -2- . < . E. That the granting of such Conditional Use. Permit will not adversely affect the comprehensive General Plan...... SEE ATTACHED NOTE: The City Planning Commission is REQUIRED BY LAW to make a written finding of facts, based upon the information presented at the time of the public hearing, that beyond a reasonable doubt the five above enumerated conditions apply. . ",,7.'.. .. . -3- .. .~ ~ '/. E. l\uditionai in1.U.dik'dQi~~ ,. . The Arcadia Municipal Code now places certw requIrements Oil a so-called" board and care facility" that make the requirements exactly similar to those of a convalescent hospital. A convalescent hospital has stringent licensing reriuirement promulgated by the State Board of Health and others. It must have certain hi<}11 paid health related personnel, while a board and care facility where no heulth C,L"e may be provided and all occupants must be ambulatory and self-sufficient is very similar to the so-called "retirement hotel" hereinbelow mentioned; Therefore applici:mt is requesting that cerLain requirements of the" board and care" provisions of the existing Arcadia Municipal Code be waived in accordance with Section 9275.9 of the Code in order to allow the construction of the facility herein applied for. In further support of the application, applicant makes the follOWing statements: The City has recently granted a permit for a so-called" retirement hotel" which could by a simple application meet all the State and County requiremems for a "board and care" faeillty. This structure, located at 753 West Duarte Road, has 60 units and is located on property with a total area of 33,000 square feet. This allows 550 square feet per unit. Additionally, this retir:ement home has 23 off-street parking spaces, or parking for 38% of the units. The propossal herein includes 108 units located on property with a total area of 81,400 square feet, which allows 754 square feet per unit. Additionally, the proposal provides 55 off-street parking spaces or parking for 50% of the units. . The off-street parking includes 28, 10 ft. x. 20 ft. spaces in opening parking. and 27, 9 it. x 20 ft. spaces in covered parking. The covered parking is to be specifically assigned to residents with small-medium and small cars. The parking space size allocated for these is as large as many cities require as minimum for large cars. No problem is antiCipated in controlling parking in the assigned covered spaces. Additionally, a one-way device is planned at the Baldwin exit. The City Planning staff in the application for Conditional Use Permit 76-6 (C.U .P. 76-6) dated March 23,1966, made a comprehensive study of unit sizes and parking facilities in some 17 retirement residences, 11 of which were located in the northeast area and four of which were located in Los Angeles City. Applicant submit s both the amount of parking provided herein and the square footage of each unit arc far in excess of the average found in that survey. That report further states that the State of California Licensing Board for board and care facilities has no parking requirements - that whatever the city requires and allows is deemed adequate but that a room must be a minimum of 100 square feet for one person and 140 square feet for two persons. The facility proposed herein contemplates that the minimum room size, exclusive of closets and private baths, shall be 255 feet with approximately 10% of the rooms being larger than that and that the room size, including closet space and private bath, will be 360 feet. . Further, applicant has briefly surveyed the cities of Glendale, Burbank, Pasadena, Temple City and Azusa and has found the board and care facilities are all allowed in an R3 or R4 area with a Conditional Use Permit. Because the board and care facility. requires that the inmates be well and ambulatory, owners providing such services do not have to have high-priced medical personnel. Board and room rates instead of being some $30 per day, as is found in convalescent hospitals in this area, are apprOximately $20 per day, or some 30% less. The requirements of the board and cure facility arc in fact nearly related to the requirements for the so-called "retirement hotels" which the Planning Commission has extensively investigated. Therefore, certain requirements relating to convalescent hospitals should be waived when the actual use and requirement::; for a board and care facility are found to be substa.ntially different than those required for a convalescent hospital. . " B. APPLICANT(S)' VERIFICATION: . Executed in the City .of Arcadia , County of Los Angeles State of-California, ..this 23rd day.of May , 19 77 I (WE) HEREBY CERTIFY (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing infor- mation and attached ownership list are ture and correct. SIGNATURES: V;;Plicant ~o ~r Telephone No. 445 2170 Address 1601 South Baldwin Avenue, Arcadia, CA 91006 (Include street, city, state and zip code) APplicant (if more than one) Telephone No. Address (Include street, city, state and zip code) . ~Q~d ~1r; GlanzlO Telephone No. 4452170 Address 1601 South Baldwin Avenue, Arcadia, CA 91006 (Include street, city, state and zip code) Telephone No. Owner of Record (if more than one) Address (Include street, city, state and zip code) RECEIVED BY b ,--5;1';;: ~ ~/2~/7,7 RECEIPT NO. DATE . -4- , II ~ I WP,ll.EIlOll-5f: I J " -11_______....___ ---- I O! ~ ~ :-R.~ II 'I o I : 0: l 10)1 I I I I I I 01 0 I I I I o i ,~, U2,:Q,!,~J~: f7~/' ?117J I I " " I I I I I .1 I I I I . C.2 "', I 5'...<.0 IT......IAN t L.. IM1>oJU'IH.. CO. " I -- '1..._____ I ~-2 I I ,"\ I VAc.. I VA.t... ~ , I I ' I (707) I (l()/) SAV-oN, "lZ/o .5Haq,:./N6' Ce'~ C.2 AJ:r1:\ l>€NA DAlR.Y C'-o VA<-. flll) eM/NO REAL AVENUE 118 I (75'1) I I I I J I I l, I I I I I I I I I 5" (71/8) I (716) (1!fO) J (71/0) I 010:0 ~1l'2~ 0:0:0 I I I,O~ 0: I I I :0 :0 I I o It.~ :::t , / ,I' I / I O I!',I' I ~',I' ~ IB-/ I / I (I<ell / 0 I ~ I \'l!. I ).. ~ ~------1 ~Z & 0 .))111 ~ !O ' J <:( ,.5 o ,:1.$0 ~ ~o 000 1"'0 (714) .s~~e sr;amav ~ C :z ~. - ~~ A~O/A C"'NV..u.=.~_ ,ya,..p~ ""-<Sv;r 1?-3 '0 """. ~o S .15 ~s - ;;"o-"i -7:r I I . ~ -/ 00000 '''U$) ,...,,,\ 0:0 , (70~)' ( lOl) .-.~J ( (117) (1/1) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C:l -.....I ~ <l' ~ " ~ ~ & ~ &:3 c r?~iZ'W .>'7~ ;::: C-2 :------. Cl.RoLJ.,\&:l.. R.eA,I.'''" ~O ~~ ~OC ~~g ;\~.. t'''' ". ... ~ 1114: --- ;.t "::\. -.. <\ ~ r::\ ~~ \2; .. "'~@ '!j52. ~ " I.ANO(jSC AND ZOlV/t1 c.u.p 77--1/ 7/6'7L8 ~AI1lNt R~ "'VAl. ~ ~ ~ " . ~~...._-... .u 'rI . 00 ! -\. :!i I" '" ~~uI~_ '-- -/1 I I - ~1'.'fII&r,_ _ ~ ~~V----r----T\: ------- 1 _ I I' I , \ ~' i\ ......" ',IljI:<;D,' ..tfl.VI~ --\ ,I ~.. ~ "' ~_.o----i ,.J ..~. . .-----' r ! TO- o~ l?t.~ , I " 11 ~. I -~~ : -.-:t , I,........ , ' ----.-Ji:> ~;:.......1' 0 ~.6.'eI .~... ~ ------- w.J o a- , ' ,,-,--,--m ITTTTTTT1 L~ncnl~~~~..J~ __L lLLr~rf__L~~.JnAlL o *-;.;..r~.' I~~ __ L~,~:_~:~~l ~'_~_i_. ! 1 ! ) ! '~"'.l")' ........'-"-..... -, " 41 " "".,..--' EUGENE p\.c P'~ ~C,A.PI"" ~~ re"c:cr-Jc:L. ~J ~ ;.AMpJO p:ta.l.. -. - FICKES .. e.l f I[ II l' II. t: 107 W. HUNTINGTON DRIVE w. & ASSOCIATES .. II. . \... II II I ARCAD'''. CALIFORNIA . . .....1.., . . " . ~ I -- ._""...... ....-.o_M ....._.......... _._~_l.WlT ..-------,-.......- -.-...........-.-1J"":""' .~T I M - 'P D\..OC 'J.' ,,""" -" ..~~ f !l<.:>llI 'c' ~- ~'" 4.~;. , I ...... ~.. ~ ., ~_.. i - .... ~.-. '>-OIo"OC t / ~~ ~ -- ..~ I, , , II (bUlLOINGS $~ ..~~,...oc,-. J_ _ .,_. tt _.~ I ~ flfJPm1J___ -- ~ ----,. tILl w-r: . . _,_ ~:~.~, 9f1r.1 ~Y- ~ ;)" . . flEd . 2 {T111 [;f;fi I--~ .. f~-!~""" ,,' , ' r.. I: -, ", ~'f- ~ _ ~' ::~.! ~ "-___ .~ ':' _un. ~ ~l...OtlJ~.tl ~NI""-'t~ flf1i1111 r~i ~~PJ fJJ ~u..J. '01 t.4,lo.j....~'$I:lC<:INO ~'i!> CMll,...OloJli '(;.' ~oJf~~. . .. " , -''< ~-.~:}~...,.~ I-"~-~_~:,"~-~.) - ...,. E U G ENE W . Fie K E S & ASS 0 C I ATE S .....-............... CIoUIt..OI..... '....--e..,'c., w.J .~ -.. ~.....,e>G. % ..Of .. c: "I TIC' U III ... Pl". ",.. ~'t~~'lC.~T ""......,o......ce.. 107 W. HUNTINGTON DRIVE ARCADIA. CALIP'OIUUA CCIlJ_tIlO' I' . . "- -.-- - - 0! ,ClOOI'"i'.1 "" J - --- M_ - ~II.DtN6 'A' ~D~f'I--1 IlL i111] -" l- I" IlflJ ~. ,-~~ -~~ I ~f~~"~ "1 I~I I I I Tt'l , .) _...;.,. ~ 1 . " ., I !ill & -' - ~r41(",) . I , , - ------- -- -- ~- - - - ------------ -- ------------------- -- -------- --- ------ ----,,-- ------- .-...,-....- e><hlc:>'~."'. ~1"...oc.-~ \ eooJIU1l~'C: ~c~1"I.Nl EUGENE & ASSOCIATES f'l.a?lC. /'1.....1-1- ~lu;"tJso.,6.:.6a;: ~r'~ ~:7I,P- e.eTI~~ ~OeN::.C ~~!A, o.~I"" .,- w. FICKES - . .. . C " I , . C: , .. . I .. " D . ~ .. II " I II . 107 W. HUNTINGTON DRIVB ARCADIA. CALll'"O'UllA ..0_'''''' -- ? ., . ",.<{ " .-~"'-' ~...- " // ""r .,- ,~,.." ._.v ,'...;" :~t.,: '-'1' ......- i LJ edU:ll.. '"r:J EUGENE . ~.....,. '/ -;,.'ip/." "....... /...,>.,../ .;.-. ~~." iOutl,.Oh....r::/ ~C1101J 'A..": 1llIIqII.~ ,- -~ ~v " -ee.cr-.orJ 'e>' ~'''''''T' :.-~ "'OIt.pI w. FICKES & ASSOCIATES II. C 1'1 Co T u" '07 W. HUNTINGTON Dfl'IVS A II . , ~ A " II I II . ARCADI..... CA1.II'"OANIA ....a_ts.' .~ <" ,....1.0>....,... tlUu::Ilo.l~'c' ,,",. ~~ci.~T . . " '"~' ...,' .::"0...... >r..;. , I i i , .. ! $oDw,": __ .~ .. ~ -~ ..- ~~.,...-"',. ..,.-- j'~ J"l--'::S'OCo.lC=. -~- . . . . " ' ~ ~ .'-"''''> , ......' " ~ ' . -i" ... W&' iff. ~ ~---.J!.\~ "\ r ~ -C',' 4HEEr 6 .' . . . --- --- " File No. {:"/./.P 77--// CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT NEGATIVE DECLARATION CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA A. Description of project: .o6'7R?<A/ 7/? ~A7F: A ~ ?~ ./f?A~// !WI? /"'~ ~///}/ B. Location of project: ~ , z;'~-~,8 uFsr '/"AH'//Vd FE7I-L , C. Name of applicant or sponsor: t?/ LA</d} r:- /A/"Y /'l'/:? D. Finding: This project will have no significant effect upon the environment within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 for the reasons set forth in the attached Initial Study. E. Mitigation measures, if any, included in the project to avoid potentially significant effects: Date: ~/q/77 s&- ~cfi~. Date Posted: 6/~/77 A5S/~ rlZ4VN/5e... Title ~ " . . . A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent r--, File No. '-:;-/'/,,0 77-// ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM O..R//\UO/.? /'lAe/7/0 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent /4//"-~.a? ~/(/6( A~h4 4/4(5.?/7~ B. ENVIRONMENTAL IMI?ACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets.) 1. !!!!:!!.. "111 thl propoul n'Dlt In' .. Un,Ubl' ..nh lXIndlt1on. Oil' In ellUl'll' in ')1010911: .ubatr\II::tur..7 b. \)h'nlJlt10fl', dhphc_nt... ___ paetion Or ovucaved"9 of the loU7 e. Chanql In tOPOlJuplly Or 9rO\l"o1 lud.earelhf teature.? d. Thed..truetlon. c~rln9cU' -.odlUeaUon of any uniq\HI 9eo1Oflc orphydcal f..tur..' e. MY incn... In wind or ...tar Iroalon of 101h. .lther on or ott thadt,l f. Chan'l" in ,UtaHon, depodtloh or eroaion Which .., -..tHy the eh'Met of . ..l"er or .tr.... 9. Eltpolura of peoph or property to !:~:tt~:~I:~:l~~::. ';r::~h7~:~::;, or .lalhr "...rd,? ~. ~, WUl the propo..1 ",.ult in. e. S\Ib.tlUlUal air eal..10ll1 or datlrlont1on of UAbhnt dr quAlitY? b. 1'1\. creation of obj.ctionabla odon1 c. Alt.r.t1onofdr~_nt. _1Itll",or te#pflr.tll.r.. or any ellan'll. in CUMt.. &itller loc.lly or re'llionally? 3. !!.ill. Will the propoul reault in' a. Change. in curnnta or tha t;OlI.na of direction of w.ter IlIIOv_nu in fr..h..tan? b. Chllngea in absorption n.tas. drdna'llapatUrna, or tha rataUld .-lIftt of aurf.~ v.t.r runoff? e. Ioaaration. to tha t;Ollr1la or flow of flood w.un? d. Chanqa in the_lIftt of all.d.ee vater In any wat.r body? e. Dheh..f'l'e into aurf.ee v.tera, Dr in .ny .ltaration of allrh.ea v.Ur 'I1I..Uty. Ine1ll.dln9 but not H...lted to tCl(Hlutura, dhaolvtld oX)'gen 0.1' turbidity? f. "Iteration of tha dine-tion or r.taof flow of 9roUn<! watan? 9. Ch.n'lle in the qu.ntity of 9rount! v.ten. either thrQ""111 direct .dditlon. or vith4z.va1., or throu9h interception of any aquUer by euta or excav.ti01'.? !!! ~...!!2. h. SubauMI&i reduction in the .-aunt of v.ter otl'tervi.e .vsJlabl. for publlc..ater lIu[>plle.? ~ 1. 1. Exposure of peoph Dr prop.rty t.o.....t..r ralllted.h..1.ud.. .uct-... flooding? L .. Phnt. Life. Will th. prop.oui re.u1t inl e. Change In the dly.nity of .peeie.. or nulllber of .ny speci.. of plants (lncllldlngtrH.. .hrub.. gr.... crop.. _lc.foflora and aquatic phnt.)? / I b. Reduction of the nv.ben of any unlqu., rar.or"ndangered.~ci.s of plent.? ~ c. Introduction of n.... apecl.. of plsnt. Into an area, Or r.sult In. barrhr to the norlO.ai replenla"-ent of eltiltlng apec:1u? S. Ani_d Lita. WHI th. proposal n.ult In, ..L a. Ch.n9a In the dlv.nl,ty of .peclu, or nullbers of ..ny .p,cles of ani.ala (blrda. lend anh.ah Includln9 nptlle.. f!all.and ahellthh, benthic Or9.n1&... In.&Ct. or .iC.fofaunal1 l' X b. hduct.l01l0f th.nll.fl.beu of .ny ""'1'111.&, rara or enda""ared .p.cl.a of .nllU1I1 .:of c. Int.roductionof nav.peeh.of anlllal. into an ar"a, or r.ault In a barrier to tile ..19ratlon or _ve- _nt. of anl..la1 ./ d. Deterioration to ..htin'll wl1dUh habitat? ,. .01... Ifill th. prcpo..1l r.eult Inl v' I / .. Incre.... In ..htin9 nol.. l.....h? b. Expo.U". of peopla to ..v.r. noh.leVOlh? " ~~~~c:n~~I~r;ht ~~l;l:=:,Propo...l t. Land v.... Ifill the propo.aal re.ult 1n i'""'iii5iTintial alt.ration of the p.f..ent or planned l.nd Il.ae of an .r..? ,/ L / t. NatunlRe.oure... NIllth.pr-opo.al r..ultln. .. Incr.... In tM ute of u.. of .ny naturll re.ource.? b. Sub.Untial dephtlon of any nonnnavabl. n.tur.1 r.._ree' -1- YES~~ J!_ v L .J! x ./ ,/ ,/ ,/ ,/ ,/ x ./ ./ 7 " . . . .- 10. Jlhk of Up,.t. Does the propoul involve.. rhlt of In t1xplollon or till rahal.of hl.udoUI subetanee. Cinelud!.",",. but not Ulllted to. 011. r:'~:l::~t C~1.~~"~:c~~~:d~:t1onl lIps.t lXItldltlonal ~~:~~~;,. .If~t~t~~:u~~~:~n::~:~ or 9rowt.h rue of the 11"',1'1 popuh- Hon or an II"'? 11, 11. ::~~~9 h:~tn;~'o~r::::~ :fhct d__nc! for ,deBUo1'l11 hOlldl'l91 U. TranlPOl"utlon/Clrculdlon. "111 UlIPropctt,U ...,..It Ii'll .. COen.ration DC substantial ..4el1_ tlonalvehieularnovllllnt? b. EUecta em ':Ilhtin<;l parUn, hdUtie. or ISnland for ....... p,t,rlr.1n<J? G. SlIbataftthlllll&Ultt upon..lat1!'>9 uanlpOrtaUcm ayu_1 d, Alteratl0111 <<I pre..nt pattern. of drt"Ulatlon or 110_"1: of people and/or qood., e. AlteraUOf\I to ...tu'bolrlMl. rell or drtl:dUc? f. Incre... in tratfie Iullal'd, to -.:>tOI" v.hlel.., blcyclhu or pedtt.tdlUlll U. Public Bervle... will the prClpOllal 111"11 an .lrect upon. or relult in I ".... Il>, n_ or ..It.e~d gove~ntl1 1."iC'e. in Iny of the following 11'.111 I. Pire protect1CWl1 b. Po11011 protection1 c. .ehoo1l1 d. Pukl M othe, ~~ationel fadUti.11 I. ll.ainteflAnce of pub11c faciU- ti.., incllldiJl9 rOlda1 f. Oth., 9<7Ver....nul ..rtices1 15. !!!.!!!I.. Will tM propo..l r..u.lt inl I. U.. 01 .1Ib.tanthl &lIOanu 01 fu.l or en.rgy1 b. .1Ib.t.lnthlincr.... in cSe.anoS IJf'ClCl exhtinq 'OIII'C" 01 .-l'9y, 01' "'fIliu the dev.lor-ant 01 n_ ,ollrc.. of l""rvr1 ... UtiUtie.. Will th. propolll r.lult ~~:t:::~.~o:l=.rr=-~ :. 1011ow- ift9\1tiUUe.. a. Power or naturll g..1 b. C-=lcltionl .y.t_1 c. Wat.r1 d. .ewer or .lptiC tanh1 I. St.onvatlr drl1nlge? I. .0Ud w..t. Ind dh5'O...17 17. R\IIlIlnRla1th. Wt11the propc>>ll rl.u.lt1n: I. Cr'ltion of Iny h.lIlth hnlrd or potenthl h.l1th hnud (.xeludin'l _ntalh...lth)? b. Expo.u... 01 peopl. to 5'Otl1\thl h.a1thhlurd.? Date 0/$/77 ~ .:!!~..!!!. ./ ./ v ./ v ./ / V' / I -:; 7' / I >1 / ./ y' 7' 7 7' 7' 1 ,/ V For -2- -, U. "elJth.~.';I. Wl11 the pro5'Olll rellllt tntheob.tru<:tionollny .~nie vht. 0.. view open to the public, 0.. ....Ulthopropo..lr..ultitlth. creation 01 an ae.thetically olten.iv. alte open to public view? 19. Ilecreatlon. Will the propoul ....ult In .n 10'1p.ct upon the qUllity Or quanUty of e..htin9 recr..Uonll opportunit1o..7 !!':!~..!!2. ...- ...- ", :~~~~~~q~~:~{~i ~~o~~.: :ter:~:~.. t~~ I lignlficant Irc:heol09icll or hhtoric..l aite. st..lX:tuu. object or bulldj",~? ./ 21. ,.....datOry rindinq. of SiqniUclnce. e. 0001 the prolect havI thl pote..thl todegndl the qUllity of theenvir_nt. .ub.tlnthlly reduce the hlbltlt of. U.h or....Ud11le .~cie., c.u.e. fi.h or wUdlUe pcpuhtion to drop belov lIelr-.u~talnln9 level.. thr...t.n to eU'ot.."te.pl.ntn...nl....le_nity. redlJl:..then~rorr..trlctlhll'l'."9. of a raHI or end.n9.r.d plant or ani_I or e11.in.t. illlpOrl.nt alll.IIlpI.. of t~ _jor period. of CdHornl. IIhtol'Y orprollhtory? b. Doe. the project ".n thl pounti" to .chhvll .hort-te~lI, to the di'lIdvant.q. of 10n9-terllenvlron_nt.lqo.1I1 (A ,"ort-terll impact On t". environMent h o..e vbi... Occun in . rellttvely brief. deUnitive period of ti_ ...u. lon9-t.na b.,.cu wUI ...dun .....11 into tn.futu.....) .../ ,/ c. Doe. the project have illp.ct. ....hich .,elndividua11y U.iUd. but cUflluhtJvely co..siderabl.? ["proj.ct ..ay h.pact On t....o Dr !lOre ...par.te re'ourCllS vber.. tho illpllct on ..ch re.ouree h rehtlvely ....11. but ....h.r. the ettect 01 U>e toUI of tho... 1l1pact. On the .nvlron_nt 1. .i9n!tlc."t., d. Do4I. the project h.v. environ_ntll affects "hichwUl..u...ub.t..ntid advers.efhct. on hUlllnba1n'l" .ilher directly or indirectly? ./ / C. DISCUSSIOtl' or EIfVtROrcKEN1'U EVALUATIOlf D. DETERMINATION (to b. c....leted ~y th. 1.I..d Ageneyl Oft the buh of lhta 1nltid .valu..ion. e1'"'find the propoe.d proj.ct COULD ~ h.... a .ignifie.nt .treet on the .nvir_nt. .nd . IlElOATIVZ DECLARATH. ....Ul b.. prep.r.d. D I tlnd tll.. slthou9h th.. proposed proj.et could h.". s d'inltlc.nt aflleto"th. environ...nt, th.........ill not b.. . Iig..Uiclnt eU.ct in this c... b.c.u.. the IIttig.tion _.su....s de.cribed on an eltsched .h.et h..... be.n .dded to the projeet. A NEGATIVE DECLARATlOll WILL BE PREPARED. o I tlnd the propo..d pro:l_t MAY h.Y'I . 1191111i....t effa-ct on the .."vir_nt. Ind I" EMVIIllONJCr.NTJ\L IlVACT IU':POAT 11 r"'lulred. ~ ,At/~.-d-[ ~.a.--- Signature) PLANN/f./~ ng?A~ .' " . _C02-ZZ~lj _ / C. t:#Aw..,.&; /A/ 7lJ~A~A/V me !?eOPl:5eP Pg)..;~::Z~~eE. cVM€ E.YA0477/?.A/. A(JW,c::vPR~ ~ U/// / .B~o L)~a.lS A/~{')AI<; ,PB?N ~ .BALPw#V A~E "'AI? c;.4<-f/NoA;2l-L (I" 'A .~o . . '7 L~AI\/.&?&~ ~ !p/?/"c?:;4/ fi~// ?.e:<f'/k'r /A/ A~d L../~ ~Avsc: ?P~)/ 77/e- / /;;r /s V~A7</r h"o~~, AN}/' ./ ~~ P-P/)L?(Y~ 4->>'.//0 N/.7T ~=r'l.J ~ /P/,.c::? -UJ.e#fi?/;/ /b'/c),U::=Z:> /N 77/~ :::nAAE. 8. ~U'~. 7J.I7.s //~ /.///LL... ~g- /A/ A c#~ O~ 77& 7.Pr<"".rA~ ~A~ LCT R.P7./FF ~./~o V~ ///Y.///) /'?= /4'VL7///?='!' rAw//;,./' A ~/~~ /~ A~~ ,,:/~ t""'/.J{~?:iI:;I/VA:L //,& /~.o:- /r/~ Av ~~uq? fA. 2?Vc~ /NR'A'7E: d /&,,:,ac4-v/NA~ /',c=q--y-/&:-,-;c:::.. /h'/.5 1Y.~h#// fFP,9'//f /N ~ /~ ,<..cN~.....P.AL e~A9"F<:..cz:7~6g~ 77#.5 /~s.z=:- ("u/n:? Nar ~ _9"~A/:.)/ &"""E,iZJ-~ ~./7;/~ ,oF- hV A;?'~ AlbY/ IN!.. rDJ/2:J0'MdM. . . .~ .< . . ___~__~_______-L.ctVL77-/ / /q1 A HP~ 7)J/J777-7l~/./. J21&:1-~~_9~.e-pLZ/R -4&-':_______ /Al6E?~ /A/ .8:Je4Hr-'77r-< YA/~ 7/7"~ A</O~ c:::'~ .m ~-H'D=:P'//. ~.l?ANA/~~R?-"'="~ ~/e-~ ;7hI/5 /-/.(/// ~ A ..50~07l-/ ~<F' ~~ . . " . :--, ,-to ". 0' J . File No. ('.IIr'. 77-/1 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM A. Applicant's Name: Address: O!iT,A r:lln Cl,flRT7,TO 1415 Orlando Dr., flrcadia, Calif. 91006 B. Property Address (Location): 7110 W <-I).M !tW t.r;.(J L '7r.o-,'/...'6 \Iv. Q'}-H.I~O t.6.a-,- C. General Plan Designation: D. ZOne Classification. R-) E. Proposed Use (State exactly'what use is intended for the property, i.e., type, activities, employment): A residence for retired persons. Pood service will be nrovided, as well as recreational, social, and ,hysical fi tness nrograrns. h'c)4,C.iJ rw.o ,--ACe . F. Square Footage of Site: ':1,400 G. Square Footage of Existing Buildings: (No existing buildings) 1. To Remain: None 2. To Be Removed: None H. Square Footage of New Buildings: excluding covered floor area of all floors indo covered parking but walks. 31,60B sq.ft. Square Footage of Buildings to be Used for: I. 1. Commercial Activities: 2. Industrial Activities: 75,704 sq. feet (excludes covered parking areas) 3.' Residential Activities: S,)04 Sr]. feet (covered rJ8rldnl' 81'''88) Number of Units. 10,':3 J. On a separate sheet, describe the following: . i: :' The environmental setting of the project site as it exists. The proposed alterations to the project site. The use and development of the surrounding properties. :>i~,; fll i:. ) -1- " . . . .., .~. .!':- . Environmental Information Form \ K. Check the appropriate answers to the following questions: 1. will the proposed project result in a substantial alteration of ground contours and/or alteration of existing drainage pattern? Yes No L 'f 'f... 'f.. "- 2. will the proposed project result in a change in groundwater quality and/or quantity? 3. Will the proposed project result in an increase in noise, vibration, dust, dirt, smoke, fumes, odor or solid waste? 4. Will the proposed project result in the use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials? .5. Will the proposed project result in a substantial increase in demand for municipal services and/or energy consumption: Explain in detail any "YES" answers to the above questions on additional sheets. L. Provide any additional information which would elaborate on the potential environmental consequences resultant from the proposed project. M. Certification: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date: 'S) L)11 '7 '. [,~ l \ \ f\ l' f, \ , ._.... ......., ~~ ~ ~ . ',_ _.'~' v\ " '-"' Signature of Appticant -2- ,...~. .' . . . ~ ' r-, .' J. The Environmental Setting: 1. The existing site is unimproved. It is treeless and is covered with weeds. The sitc slones approximately 8 feet downward from the northwe"t corner of the property, adjacent to Camino ~eal. to the southeast corner, adjacent to Raldwin ~vernle. 2. The proposed alterations to the Droject site: The construction of a 108 unit retirement residence with beautifully landscaned exterior areas. ~ddition- 'ally, 55 Dff-street parking spaces will be provided with approximately one-half of these covered. 3. The use and Development of the surrounding properties: The property to the east is an Areo Service Station. which is presently considerin{! addinc rental storage uni ts around the peri rhery. 'rhese waul d be along the common property lines with this property. The property to the south is the Arcadia Convalescent Hospital. owned by Orlando Clarizio. who is the owner of this property and the applicant for this project. The property directly to the west is also owned by Orlando Clarizio. It has a 90 foot frontage on Camino Real. This 90 foot parcel and the next piece of property to the east are also in the B-3 zone. The next piece of property has an older one-story residence. -3- .' ; ..:~ ......... ,".. ~. K. Appropriate Answers to the following questions: . 1. Will the proposed project result in a substantial alteration of ground contours and/or alteration of existing drainage pattern? ANSWER: Yes, The space in the center of the property is to be a beautifully landscaped garden area of approximately 92 Ft.'x 135 Ft. The North side of this area will have substantial ex- cavation in order that the garden level may be on the same level with the Ground Floor of Building "A". Additional excavation would be made along the South side of Buildings B & C, so that parking in the Ground Floor of these buildings is accessible from the South dr i veway . . Except for driveway ramps, there would be no obvious alterations of ground contours from Camino Real and Baldwin Avenues. A long retaining wall would be necessary along the South side of this property. This is a common property line with the Arcadia Con- valescent Hospital, which is also owned by the applicant. Drain- age of the parking area and any overflow of garden area noted above would be into yard drains, that would flow to sump and be pumped into the sewer system. Other drainage would be nominal. 2. Will the proposed project result in a change of groundwater quality and/or quantity? . ANSWER: Yes - Quantity No - Quality: Since uncovered parking areas for 28 cars are being provided (in addition to the covered parking areas), this along with the driveways, would add to the grourid water, since no seepage would take place in these areas. However, this project would not add any more water than an R-3 residential development, as areas provided take into consideration that only a small percentage of the residents will be driving. 5. Will the proposed project result in a substantial increase in de- mand for municipal services and/or energy consumption? ANSWER: Yes and No: . Paramedics - Yes, more than average. Fire - Le~s than average. Police - Less than average. Water - Less than average, because lawn areas will be under care- ful control, older persons take less baths, laundry will be done centrally. Electrical - Less, as there will be many group social activities, and living units will be used less than usual. Group watching of T.V., etc. Natural Gas - There will be fewer than average outside walls and roof areas, thus, less heat loss. There will be central cooking and laundry. -4- . "'-!'.. . ~ " . .'. ",' . . . /_...... STUDIO CITY RETIREMENT VILLA 4509 Laurel Canyon Boulevard North Hollywood, California (Telephone: 213/769-0144) (A private retirement located in approximately the same location as related to business as the proposed Arcadia Retirement Residence. The villa also has residents of approximately the same financial status as anticipated for the proposed retirement residence in Arcadia.) OWner: Mr. Alan Golden Manager: Mr. Greg Scaduto Units: 53 Residents: 69 (Approx. 135% of the units) This was the census as of 5-5-77, which Mr. Scaduto indicated, was about average. Automobiles owned by Residents: Mr. Scaduto estimated that approximately 10% of the residents owned automobiles. This would be approx. 7 cars. Off-Street Parking: 25 Spaces, with additional spaces available, if end to end parking is used on one' side. -5-