HomeMy WebLinkAbout1084
.
.
.
,
.
~,
RESOLUTION NO. 1084
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF ARCADIA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL
OF A ZONE CHANGE FROM C-l TO R-3 FOR THE
PROPERTY AT 9834-9836 WEST NAOMI AVENUE.
WHEREAS, an application was filed by Garo Babikian on
December 26, 1978, requesting a zone change from C-l to R-3
(Multiple Family) for the property at 9834-9836 West Naomi Avenue,
more particularly described as follows:
The east 66 feet of the west 381 feet of Lot 6, Block "A",
of the Santa Anita Land Company's Tract, as per map recorded
in Book 6, page 137 of Maps, in the office of the Recorder
of Los Angeles County.
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on January 23, 1979,
at which time all interested persons were given full opportunity to
be heard and to present evidence:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION
MAKES THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION AND FINDS AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the factual data submitted by the Plan-
ning Department in the attached staff report is true and correct.
SECTION 2. The Planning Commission recommends to the
City Council a zone change from C-l to R-3 for the property at
9834-9836 West Naomi Avenue.
SECTION 3. That the Planning Commission finds that the
proposed zone change would be consistent with the General Plan
and that the public convenience, necessity and welfare justify
the proposed zone change.
-1-
1084
.
.
..
.
SECTION 4. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption
of this resolution and shall cause a copy to be forwarded to the
City Council of the City of Arcadia.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was
adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the
City of Arcadia held on the 13th day of February, 1979, by the
following vote:
AYES:
Commissioners Clark, Hedlund, Hegg, Soldate,
Sargis
NOES:
None
ABSENT:
Commissioners Brink, perlis
,~-
ATTEST:
~/7IVLI~Ad7
Secretary
-2-
1084
.'
.
.'
January 23, 1979
TO:
FROM:
CASE NO.:
PREPARED BY:
CITY OF ARCADIA
PLANNING COMMISSION
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ZONE CHANGE Z-79-1
DONNA L. BUTLER
ASSISTANT PLANNER
GENERAL INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
Garo Babikian
LOCATION:
REQUEST:
AREA:
FRONTAGE:
EXISTING
LAND USE
AND ZONING:
SURROUNDING
,LAND USE
AND ZONING:
GENERAL
PLAN:
9834-9836 West Naomi Avenue
Zone change from C-l (Limited Commercial) to R-3
(Multiple-Family Zone)
20,130 square feet
66 feet on Naomi Avenue
Three single-family dwellingsl zoned C-l.
North: Neighborhood and community shopping center I
zoned C-l D and C-2
South: Mixed residential usesl zoned R-2 and R-A*
East: Single-family dwellings and condominiums I
zoned R-3
West: Mixed residential usesl zoned C-l.
*Located in the County area.
The subject site is designated as Multiple Family
Residential 7+ dwelling units per acre.
Z-79-1
2
.
HISTORY
This property was annexed to the City in the mid 1960's. At
the time of annexation, the property was placed in zone classification
R-l. In January 1966, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1315
which rezoned this property and the area to the west C-l.
In March 1972, the General Plan was adopted which designated this
site as Medium Density Residential (7-12 dwelling units per acre).
In January 1973, the Planning Department initiated a zone change
(2-72-8) for the consideration of rezoning this C-l area to R-2
in order to promote consistency between the General Plan and the
zoning. The Commission determined and recommended to the City
Council that the zoning be changed to R-3. Following public hearings
before the City Council, the Council determined that the zoning
should remain C-l.
.
In July 1974, the Planning Department initiated a General Plan
change for the consideration of redesignating the area from Medium
Density Residential to General Commercial to reflect the prior
action of the City Council. Following public hearings before the
Planning Commission, the Commission determined that the current
General Plan designation of Medium Density Residential should not
'be changed. No further action on the General Plan change was taken.
Again, the Planning Commission felt that appropriate zone change
hearings should be initiated for the' consideration of changing the
zoning of this area from C-l to R-2 which would be consistent with
the current General Plan designation.
In October 1974, zone change 2-74-3 was introduced recommending
that this area be brought into consistency with the General Plan
and that the subject property be rezoned to R-2. The Planning
Commission adopted Resolution 869 which recommended a zone change
from C-l to R-2 for the properties at 9808-9836 Naomi Avenue.
This item was tabled by the City Council on November 19, 1974.
The City Council at this meeting directed staff to begin a General
Plan change for this area (G.P. 74-3). Following public hearings,
the City Council adopted Resolution 4480 on February 18, 1975,
which recommended that the General Plan be changed to High Density
Resi~enti~l 13+ du/ac.
In April 1975, the General Plan was amended and the Medium Density
Residential and High Density Residential designations were combined
and a new designation was established of "Multiple Family Residential
(7+ du/ac)". This is the present General Plan classification on
the property.
If
.
.
.
Z-79-1
3
PROPOSAL
The applicant is proposing to develop this lot and the lot immediately
to the east, 816-818 West Naomi Avenue (zoned R-3) with 18 condo-
minium units. This development would be consistent with the General
Plan;
ANALYSIS
The subject property has been zoned C-l for approximately 13
years. During this time there has not been any commercial develop-
ment in this area.
This zone change would be consistent with the General Plan and
would promote development of the area.
Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental
Quality Act, the Planning Department has prepared an initial study
for the proposed project. Said initial study did not disclose
any substantial or potentially substantial adverse change in any
of the physical conditions within the area affected by the project
including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, ambient noise,
and objects of historical or aesthetic significance. Therefore,
a Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project.
Before the Planning Commission and City Council take action on
this project, the Commission and Council should "move to approve
and file the Negative Declaration and find that the project will
not have a significant effect on the environment."
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Department recommends approval of zone change request
Z-79-1 from C-I to R-3.
After taking action on this application, the Planning Commission
should direct staff to prepare a resolution for adoption at its
next meeting. The Planning Commission's action shall not be final
until adoption of this resolution. The appeal period for this
action commences at the time the Commission adopts the resolution.
DLB/cm
Attachments
.
PAIVT RY
f.1ARKET
C-ID
I (qaes)
00
.
7GO ~..
~
~.~O
l! "
~ I~...
~o::.-O
..~
~~
..."
,...,'DO'"
~'..
~ t ",,,
:::.
1:':->0
olio>
<&~
.. ~ 1I~.3(,
....,
o
o
~ 0
,..
o
i"' 0
mZ
I/l
,~~ 0
\t\
Z"79-1
(i?S/:%)
( 'iSIJt)
('81&0 )
Cl
O~
'"
o ~t
o
sq Q>
U)Q - - <<'I>
o
o t
o
o
'00;1.<'1;
,,,,,
-
V A C A I~ Ti,
"T
C.: ,., (7(,0$) (~
-, A (eo,) (75"
(811) (1109) ,,' "".T7 '"
~/Il-9-SIS)"'l/ ...,
u'AVE.
Oll",
o 0
0"1
o
~
() "0
o n
~ ~
~ ~
"* 0
-
o
T
''''40-.
(800)
..,
(8Cl'3
o 0 ~ 0 0 to'" (.", _, ,eo
fT1 .. CAMI~fAL
LAND USE: < ZONING 1"-100'. /'\ _
SCALE: !-.-)
NORTH
378
NAOMI
(1I1l!.8''') (SIC) 1
,0" I( <98'::;
(9826) /('I8~l$
;OV~O,>
~a~ R.;; >' ~
'Ii'lj'/~j ~ @ ~ :-
O C lX1',;.; '& . ~ ct
1)'// . ,.
l 0 ~
I/., I"./.-
~/~
~..."
COUNTY,",: 0
o Z
-~. 0
O\(jl
-\)>0
o 1~
o ~ 0
@
"l/
,,,,,. :%...
(,0
..."
13.lt
0;0
R2.
4>7
o
.,0
00
R-...
o
r
..
..
III
o
o
o
'.
ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION
TO THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION:
FILE NO. 2- ~- t
4.
1. APPLICANT
NAME G,-"\ R C L.SA 13 /k:.' /A /-....J
ADDRESS /27C ,/< / vi~;<'A D,R <> /P4.s'A1JeNA -9//07
TELEPHONE NUMBER 35'/ '7.5C / c/1':fc.€,= 7 </55200
INTEREST IN PROPERTY A RCiI/ T~C~ /
2. . PROPERTY O.NER (b",./J,){J$>?! /~ ~/ &~lT";;;'~":;;;:'iQ.ASK;<J
NAME M.R $M S CIJRLTC;-.) HERBER. /YJANS';OU '/..<:1 -, mp4/V/'
5"V-'Nr/IYT/NC,7?;;V DIi(/VE# / {!061., 7?>~'LFF. AYE
ADDRESS ,A CAPIA - CA - c-', ':1), - C'A - 90505
TELEPHONE NUMBER
DATE PROPERTY WAS ACQUIREDAM)( ::'<1--19;/ Nr., v'FMBF-R ~o 1976
f
PROPERTY ADDRESS 9E,34 - '7!33~ W, NAOIlJI AVE/v'L/E:. - AR0ID/~,
LEGAL DESCRIPTION filE lEAs,r ~t,;, ,rP~7 o,p 77iE wes,T 38/ ~ qF LOT ce;
h H ,
8i_Oc:1< AI o;='i?JE S"A,I.j7?lAN/~ LAND aMP/JN)r''<; -;;J::AC)-, AS PJEf';. mAp
,
.
3.
5.
8.E~DI:"'" IN &:JCJI<. cO PI'" /37 OF MAPS < ;,N7JlE. c!)Fr-/c,e. 0/ ~
REC::-C=>RDF-ER or 5..0.. Ie:::=:> ~~ 'Ty , '
DEED RESTRICTIONS
seE ATTJ,ClleD TITLE REPCf(T
6.
REQUEST 7; c~'o/l?e ',he /Jronle/JI zOr)~;''1 0/
. I .../ . ,I .../ f
.::.1h",," I- cL)^-,-..Im/;'/.vr~ r~ GC i c(l.mA"~/~c
,-
'./
"'%'C:.( /.:- zv...,.._/ /<-3
I
c. / -:G; A"- 3 -I~
I
WI'/!... 8/~-~/6
W, N:;lt:Jm,' Ave, pr o/>('r/y ,
/ /
A ZONE C'HANGE'-../.
.'
-1-
.
.
, '.
.
'.
7. ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:
A. Does public necessity require the proposed change: Is there
a real need in the community for more of the types of uses
permitted by the zone requested than can be accommodated in
the areas already zoned for such uses?
(Fully explain your answers, considering the
surrounding property as well as the property
proposed to be reclassified.')
~re I~ 0.. J; ~d~ nud --'-~r CD""'/';'I;'I<I/J1~ I~ A ~d- CH "'jJ,f
be o6urved I/,e /lei.. <!.O/1~'m//;~<lm -4.vc!.,0 mC!n~ el? ~.. 6.4,*,
~<l1 ,,-/s:tJ,1. 61e qr Co~s I; e7;7;..' Ve:
1j,e:'r~Ar.s ' / P"-=AD$~ ~." c:!.'zCfA.,_ d€.J J)rL.SJ!./);I-'Z.d::>n:,'"...~ "Jl
-r I /j / --../, ?
--;ll!E.. Dro~r7 -:Co sa7-'s/j 7'te:- I?EE-./ o/~e. D</6ke...,...: A~~,
, I / T' ,... /
B. Is the property involved in the proposed reclassification more
suitable for the purposes permitted in the proposed zone than
for the purposes permitted in the present classification?
(Answer completely; give all reasons for your
answer) .
7e. propose.,) r.e:c:las$/jc';;;,;A. l'.s ,nor~ sc/,'~.6'/e.:-i-r ~'Z-I
/ / , / T // / 1/
Pt.'r.o-c$lec pJ1':.rm,#L_ u,' Me- pr70ft.~ 'Z..s:>,,~ ~et.Vs~:
/)/ /. / ' .U..,I / I / / ...L
Ol - (J"h1b/A"'-/ wITh. <7?e.. ~;aee/}r cdlsr Dr-oPt:.rTy
./ , . v / ./
;'/ CrE.ak ~ c.o~m';'~v",,-, 7JrO/~--1 w,'I:< ~ /J~rk-//I<e..;
f/ ," ' ,)...? .I / '-"'/ I.. ,::( / ,
s .wAle/""" /$ ~,I /1u ;... cV..(2/haA..__ /"'" ~,~ .
L../
" ~<:C eel (1 ) v,..:.{.~ "'-- 6e~ r-
vse-j ~/'L /r+E~~ I": "'- /!e<;,;.h^~.i/ ~=" E-
-ll.or. ,/;0. ~ Co~"merCI"'/ "2--=nE..,; .
..2-
,- .
.
.
.'
C. Would the uses permitted by the proposed zone be detrimental
in any way to the surrounding property?
(Explain reasons supporting your answer.)
. / ,/./ / /..1' / / -I d / ' ,./.
/Vo 0 ,/_' A-o. ,;,e ",.e'T'merr"Te{/ ,0 r" 5Urr~(/Ad/A-J/r'J')t!r'Y.
(On -~er CDh/~c7Ti ../ (J. ~u/-! A'er~ cr.&:-lr.E. 0... (//")>,5- I
~ .'Y /
0/ ...Ieve:/oJJ/nt"/'lT 0/1 IYe::1 Nc:lom,' Ave.
,~ /
~7i!-E nt!u.- c€'Jm',;.. ,,,;..... CA.";: iYuC/;D~' Dresen ~ "301;'", On ill: &cA:
Pre:> v'rs I/a/ ..... '5/;"')/~r a4yc;-..{'n7rlenf /s 111(>;" ~a;-::Ol?i~
/ .Jot 1/ / / I.L./ jJ . /
llJ.fll1... 7!'oL s</rrtnJ~,.':-C? ,')rc>PFr. v 7^.4'^- ~^<>7h.e'- ,k/A.d
\. / / / /
')1 _4.. V' c/ ;'" /n~"'" t', '
D. What were the original deed restrictions. if any. concerning
the type and class of uses permitted'on the property involved?
Give the expiration date of these restrictions.
(You may attach a copy of these restrictions. after
propertly underscoring the portions that are in
answer to this question).
, / I
~ EE -4~C"I?....__,
-I-~'/,,' se/.
'::::/GClSe
/ #-. / I
"" &:\c-/)~ c::-'
.f:,:~/~m....r.:JrY ;4"/4 ~porl-
I I
.
I
,.
/
y
-3.