Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1241 (2) ; . PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1241 A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (C.U.P, 83-12) FOR THE EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING AUTOMOTIVE GARAGE AT 42 WEST LIVE OAK AVENUE. . WHEREAS, on May 24, 1983 an application was filed by William Skib- sted to expand an existing automotive garage, Planning Department Case No. C.U.P. 83-12, on property commonly known as 42 West Live Oak Avenue, more particularly described as follows: Lot 1, Block A, Tract 10898, in the City of Arcadia, County of Los Angeles, State of California, as per Map recorded in Book 189, Pages 42 and 43 of Maps. in the Office of said County Recorder. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on June 14, all ~nterested persons were given full opportunity pres~nt evidence; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1, That the factual data submitted by the Planning DE- partment in the attached report is true and correct. Section 2. This Commission finds that: 1. The granting of a Conditional Use Permit as hereinafter pro- vided will not be detrimental to the public health or welfare or injur- ious to the property or improvements in such zone or vicinity. 2. The use applied for at the location indicated is properly one for which a Conditional Use Permit is authorized. 1983, to be at which time heard and to . 3. The site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate said use, including all yards, parking loading, land- scaping and other features required to adjust said use with the land and uses in the neighborhood. 4. The site abuts streets and highways adequate in width and pave- ment type to carry the kind of traffic generated by the proposed use. 5. That the granting of such Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the comprehensive General Plan. 6. The use applied for will not have a substantial adverse impact on the environment. - 1 - 1241 . . . Section 3. That for the foregoing reasons this Commission grants a Conditional Use Permit for the expansion of an automotive garage \ upon the following conditions: ' 1. That the following conditions,. set forth from the Department of Public Works be completed to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works: A. Construct curb, gutter, sidewalk and driveway aprons per City Standards on WeIland Avenue. B. Construct ramp for handicapped per city Standard at the south- east corner of Live Oak Avenue and WeIland Avenue. C. Submit grading and drainage plan for approval of the Director of Public Worsk. D. If gates are installed at driveway entrances, they shall not open over the parkway. 2. That a modification shall be granted for 25 parking spaces in lieu of 32 spaces required. This approval shall not constitute an approval for any change in use that would require more than 2 parking spaces per 1,001 square feet of gross floor area for the 6,067.62 square foot automotive garage approved by C.U.P. 83-12. That any modification granted for parking shall only be for the use approved by C.U.P. 83-12. Final parking plan shall be subject to Planning De- partment review and approval. 3. That one hundred square feet of additional landscaping be provided. Landscaped areas shall have a complete irrigation system; shall be maintained in perpetuity; and shall be reviewable annually. Final landscape (size and type of plants) and irrigation plan shall be subject to Planning Department review and approval. 4. A modification shall be granted for one hundred square feet of landscaping in lieu of three hundred square feet required within the interior of the parking area. 5. A modification shall be granted for a 5 '_0" wide landscape buffer in lieu of 5'-3" in width required between parking lot and WeIland Avenue, , f>. A modification shall be granted for as' _3" rear yard setback in lieu of 20'-0". - 2 - 1241 . . 7 . be granted for a 6'-0" high fence in lieu as per visibility standards on file in A modification shall of a ,maximum height of 3'-0" the Plannlng Department. B. All work for the automotive garage shall be done inside the buildi ng. 9. That all'conditions of approval shall be complied wi~h prior to C.U.P. 83-12 becoming effective. io. That the site shall be maintained as per the plans on file in the Planning Department. 11. That C.U.P. 83-12 shall not take effect until the owner and applicant have executed a form available at the Planning Department indicating awareness and acceptance of the conditions of approval. Section 4. The decision, findings and conditions contained in this Resolution reflects the Commission's action of June 14, 1983 and the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Dixon, Harbicht, Jahnke, Fee NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioners Kirkpatrick, Sargis, Wells ABSTAIN: None Section 5. The Secretary this Resolution and shall cause a Council of the City of Arcadia. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of June, 1983. shall certify to the copy to be forwarded adoption of to the City Chairman ATTEST: . Secretary - 3 - 1241 . . . PUBLIC HEARING C.U.P, 83-12 42 West Live Oak Avenue Consideration of a Conditional Use Permit to allow expansion and operation of an existing automotive garage. The staff report was presented; the public hearing was opened. Mr, William Skibsted, 42 West Live Oak present and spoke for his application. landscape strip shown on his plan, and 1035 South Fourth Avenue, applicant, was Mr. Skibsted requested deletion of the buffer Commissioner Jahnke suggested moving the trash container to the back of the property, and improving the parking. There were no others to speak to the application. MOTION It was moved by Commissioner Jahnke, seconded by Commissioner Harbicht, to close the public hearing; the motion passed by voice vote with none dissenting. Commission Dixon favored the application, with the suggested move of the trash enclo- sure to the back of the property, and felt that the 5' strip of landscaped buffer waS adequate, Commissioner Jahnke pointed out that by continuing the landscaping down the east side of the property at least 100 square feet of landscaping would be gained, and suggested that perhaps instead of 300' the Commission might require 100 square feet additional landscaping. Commissioner Harbicht also did not consider the additional 300 square feet of land- scaping of primary importance and he would be in favor of the project; moving the trash enclosure to the back of the property was a good revision, he thought. Page 3 June 14, 1983 ~ . . . . ~ PUBLIC HEARING C.U.P. 83-12 (Cont'd) I MOTION 'It was moved by Commissioner Jahnke, seconded by Commission Dixon, to approve C.U.P. 83-12 based on the staff's recommendation with the following modifica- tions to that staff recommendation; Item I, modified to grant 24 parking spaces in lieu of 21; Item 3, modified so that 100 square feet instead 300 square feet of landscaped area shall be provided, also a 5' in lieu of a 5'-3" wide landscaped buffer; all other modifications up to and including No. 9 as is. Further moved to approve and file the Negative Declaration and find that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment, and direct staff to prepare the appropriate resolution incorporating the specific findings and conditions of approval as modified by the Commission, Commissioner ,Jahnke explained that the reason he left the 100 additional feet of landscaping in the conditions is so that the applicant will continue the east side parking strip back to the building; by so doing he gains 140 square feet. Commissioner Jahnke wished to add a point to the Motion: to remove the trash enclosure from the location now indicated into the proposed one-story body shop, ~ Commissioner Dixon accepted the addition to the motion. Mr, Wong pointed out that the number of parking spaced granted in the motion should be 26 spaces, not 24. There was a discussion regarding the placing of the trash container inside the shop building; the consensus of the Commission was not in favor, principally oecause of fire danger. Commissioner Dixon wichdrew his second to the motion; Commissioner Jahnke withdrew his motion. MOTION It was moved by Commissioner Jahnke, seconded by Commissioner Harbicht, to approve C.U,P, 83-12 in accordance with staff recommendations, with changes 1) 25 parking spaces be required, 2) that 100 square feet of additional landscaping be provided in lieu of 300 square feet, 3) that a 5'-0" wide landscaped buffer be provided in lieu of 5'-3" along Weiland Avenue. ROLL CALL AYES: NOES: ABSENT,: Commissioners Dixon, Harbicht, Jahnke, Fee None Commissioners Kirkpatrick, Sargis, Wells . Page 4 June 14, 1983 . . . JUNE 14, 1983 TO: FROM: CASE NO,: PREPARED BY: CITY OF ARCADIA PLANNING COMMISSION PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83-12 WILFRED E. WONG ASSISTANT PLANNER GENERAL INFORMATION APPLICANT: \~i 11 iam Ski bs ted LOCATION REQUEST: LOT AREA: FRONTAGE: EXISTING LAND USE & ZONING: 42 West Live Oak Avenue Conditional Use Permit to allow expansion of an existing automotive garage. Proposal will require the following modifications: A. 5' -3" rear yard setback in lieu of 20' -0" (9263.2.4.C) . B. Deletion of requirement for 3% of the interior of parking area to be landscaped (9265.5.1.) C. 23 parking spaces in lieu of 32 spaces required or alternate plan for 23 spaces in lieu of 34 spaces (9269.5.), D. 5'-0" wide landscaped buffer in lieu of 5'-3" in width required between parking lot and WeIland Avenue (9269,13,A.) E. 6'-0" high fence in lieu of maximum height cf 3'-0" as per visibility standards on file in the Planning Department, but top 4'-0" of fer.ce shall ccnsist of open wrought iron to allow for visibility, Approximately 24,030 square feet (.55 acre) 287.96 feet along WeIland Avenue ap.d 74.59 feet along Live Oak Avenue 1,872 square foot automotive garage and 36 square foot drive.,Ln phot6 procesiinz business (lotomat), zoned C-M Page 1 . . . SURROUNDING LAND ,. USE AND ZONING: North: Commercial Retail Center and Produce market: zoned C-2 and C-M Supeyior Concrete Block' zoned C-~: and M..l Multiple-family residential: zoned R-3 (Temple City) Mixed Commercial: zoned C-M West: South: East: GENERAL PLAN DESIGI'iATION: Commercial PROPOSAL AND ANALYSIS The applicant proposes to expand an existing automotive garage by con.. struc:ing a 4,195.62 square foot addition. Twenty-three parking spaces are planned for the site. A 5'-0" landscape buffer will be along WeIland Avenue and a 5'-3" buffer along the rear property line. Also. a 6'-0" high wrought iron fence with a concrete block base and columns will be constructed along WeIland Avenue and a 6'-0" high solid masonry wall along the rear property line. A 16' x 25' trash enclosure is proposed north of the existing garage. An alternate plan for a 4,583.18 square feet of additional building area is proposed if the modification for a 5'-3" rear yard setback is denied. The alternate Plan will have a 20'-0" rear yard setback with the trash enclosure moved within said rear yard, Then a second addition of 819 square feet (Z&' x 29,25') would be built north of the existing garage (original location of trash enclosure). The Planning Department feels that a 5'-3'. rear yard setback would allow for an appropriate improvement. One mitigating factor would be the driveway adjacent to the rear property line. Also. the proposed construction will be single story, sixteen feet in height with a six foot high solid masonry wall along the rear property line to bloc~ any view into the adjacent. apartment complex. It is the Planning Department's opinion that this part of the City is in need of upgrading. Therefore, whenever possible landscaping should be provided as required by Code. Even though two parking spaces may be lost, staff recommends that three hundred square feet of additional landscaping be provided. Also, the landscape buffer between the parking lot and \.felland avenue should be 5' -3" in width, It is also recommended that shrubs or trees be planted within said landscape buffer along WeIland Avenue to provide for screening, as long as low level landscaping is used within visibility areas designated by the Planning Department. Presently. the site has only four striped parking spaces. The C-M zone parking requirements state that parking facilities shall be provided in accordance with the standards for Commercial zones. If C.U.P. 83-12 6/14/83 Page 2 . . . the Commercial parking standard is used, thirty-two parking spaces would be required. If the garage were to be considered unde; the industrial parking standard (M-l or M-2 zone), fourteen park~ng spaces would be required. Following is a breakdown of these parking require- ments: COMMERCIAL STANDARD 36 sq.ft. Fotomat (5 spaces per 1,001 sq.ft. plus one employee space) 1.18 6067.62sq.ft. garage (5 spaces per 1,001 sq.ft.) Alternate Plan 6,455.18 sq.ft. would require 32.24 spaces ; 30.31 31.49 Total Spaces Required ; 32 Alternate Plan ; 34 INDUSTRIAL STANDARD 36 sq,ft. Fotomat (5 spaces per 1,001 sq.ft. plus one employee space) 1.18 6067.62 sq.ft. garage (2 spaces per 1,001 sq.ft.l Alternate Plan 6,455,18 sq,ft. would require 12.90 spaces ; 12.12 13,30 Total spaces required ; 14 Alternate Plan ; 15 The reques t for a 6' -0" high fence in I ieu of a maximum height of 3' -0" : as per the City's visibility standards, has been consistently approved for commercial, industrial and residential properties if the fence consisted of open work 3'-0" above grade. The proposed fence with landscaping will be an attractive addition along WeIland Avenue. The proposed use and development of the site are consistent with the General Plan and zoning of the area. Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, the Planning Department has prepared an initial study for the proposed project. Said initial study did not disclose any substan- tial or potentially substantial adverse change in any of the physical conditions within the area affected by the project including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, ambient noise, and objects of C.U.P. 83-12 6/14/83 Page 3 ... historical or aesthetic significance. Therefore, a Negative Declara- tion oas been prepa~ed for this project. If the Planning Commission intends to take action to approve this proj- ect, the Commission should move to approve and file the Negative Dec- laration and find that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment and direct staff to prepare the appropriate resolu- tion, incorporating the specific findings and conditions of approval set forth in the staff report (or as modified by the Commission). If the Planning Commission intends to take action to deny this project, the Commission should move to deny and direct staff to prepare an appco- priate resolution incorporating the Commission's decision and findings in support of that decision. RECOMt~ENDA T I ON The Planning Department recommends approval of C.D.P. 83-12 su~ject to the follo~ing conditions: 1. That the conditions set forth in the attached memorandum from the Departmenc of Public Works be completed to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. . 2. That a modification shall be granted for 21 parking spaces in lieu of 32 or 34 spaces required if necessary to comply with the landscaping requirements see forth in condition number 3. This approval shall not constitute an approval for any change in use that would require more than 2 parking spaces per 1,001 square feet of gross floor area for the 6,067.62 square foot automotive garage approved by C.D,P, 83-12. That any modification granted for parktng shall only be for the use approved by C.D.P. 83-12.. Final parking plan shall be subject to the Planning Department's review and ap?roval. 3. That three hundred square feet of additional landscaping be provi- ded, Also, a 5'-3" wide Landscape buffer shall be provided between the parking area and WeIland Avenue.. Landscaped areas shall have a complete irrigation system: shall be maintained in perpetuity: and snaIL be reviewable annually. Final landscape (size and type of plants) and irrigation plan shall be subject to the Planning Department's review and approval. 4. A modification shall be granted for a 5'-3" rear yard setback in lieu of 20'-0". 5. A modificacion shall be granted for a 6'-0" high fence in lieu of a maximum height of 3'-0' as per visibility standards on file in the Planning Department. . O. All wor!~ for the automotive garage shall be done inside the building. C.D.P. 83-12 6/14/83 Page 4 . . . 7. That all conditions of approval shall be complied with pcior to C.U.P. 83-12 becoming effective. 8. That the site shall be maintained as per the plans on file in the Planning Depar~ment. -9. That C,U.P. 83-12 shall not take effect until the owner and applicant have executed a form available at the Planning Depar~ment indicating awareness and acceptance of ~he conditions of approval. C.u.P. 83-12 6/14/83 Page 5 e . . June 1, 19fj3. TO: PLANNING DEPARTMENT FROM: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS SUBJECT: C.U.P. 83-12 -- 42 WEST LIVE OAK AVENUE The following conditions of approval are recommended: 1, Construct curb, gutter, sidewalk and driveway aprons per City Standards on Welland Avenue. 2. Construct ramp for handicapped per City Standard at the southeast corner of Live Oak Avenue and Welland Avenue, 3. Submit grading and drainage plan for approval of the Director of Public Works. NOTE: If gates are installed at driveway entrances, they shall not open over the parkway. &.t~ // 4-C:t?~/ CHESTER N. HOl'JARD Director of Public Works CNH:JD:ms . . . L45 77J. .)7!1, r. c Mis DF). . , I I RE{AIL '-So/ ~p~~ , C-M I ) )"n 5 ,,'~ 3 o p (J!l) ( f<e.'TfJL- CE:N1~ 1.1 -1/-1.9 I( C-'2- 27_ 30e.'4 2.s-.~]) (9) 10, 'I g LIVE- 0/:..:'1.... ~'JF.. ,>0 "( ~'J 1(. .. I 'jIO' - ,0 , ~~ ~If.; _ CO~~- 11\-\ " t~7,'5 a ~-? 0 F 2 @ " -l 1(,1.';''> ~ '" '> <) .f'> ,) gO ((g01 C~e <"~~ - oJ"' ~c-M ::: '>0 \. ~ ~ ;= _I rj I " lOCo 'J "~ ~o' u.l ~ ~ .0 '" '" <51.(,5 de '(; 5<),1' (3&) 60_13 (ZtJ) llC,j4 (Z2) M\~ c..- M '" <0 or> "" <" or> co: ., ~ '" o '" '" ~ 80 so ;: ~() \eM;~ eo(\'{ J ' ~@~~? or> <) CUP 83-!c. LAND USE 8 ZON I NG I" = lOa' SCALE C . u . P. B 3-12 File No. . CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT NEGATIVE DECLARATION CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA A. Description of an addition to project: an existing automotive garage and improve the Conditional Use Permit to construct lot. B. Location of project: 42 West Live Oak Avenue Arcadia, CA 91006 c. Name of applicant or sponsor: william Skibsted . D. Finding: This project will have no significant effect upon the environment within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 for the reasons set forth in the attached Initial Study. E. Mitigation measures, if any, included in the project to avoid potentially significant effects: ure May 25, 1983 Date: . Date Posted: Assistant Planner Title .. - . . " File No. C.U.P. 83-12 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent William Skibsted 1035 S. Fourth Avenue 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent Arcadia, CA 91006 (213) 445-8489 B. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPAcrS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets.) 1. !.!.!!.!!. 11'111 the propel...l uult 111' .. On'tabl_ ..rth eondHlo". or 1,. ~h&n.,., 1I1 "'1010'l1<: sut>ltructur.,l b. Dhruptio"l, Gllphc._ntl, eo_- pa"tlol1 Or oveu:ovlrlnq or the 10iU !!! ~ .!!2. e. ChIn.... III topoquphy or 9fOlllld lurf,,,erelllt te.t""..? / ./ '/ / I I d. 'I'he c1eatrucUOl\, COVldn'l Or aodlHcluon of ."y unlql,ll .,_L0'I1c or phya1eat !lu;ur..1 t. Any, ~ncr..u 1n ,;ind or ...tar .rOllonorIOlll,llthlronoroft th..ltl? t. elll""'" In nltation, depOJ,LUon or .roUOl'l ""uch "IV lIIOdity thl cha"nel of. nV,t or Itr._. 'I. Expolute of peoph or propany to 91010'1'" haz.rdl OUCh .1 ..rthquI..a, II"dlh4..., IOUd.1>4.... ...round taUur.. Or 11I'lh.r h..u'd.? ./ 1. ~. Will the propoul rnl,llt in, I. SubltanHat ur e_lulO..1 or detenoratlon of alBbhnt dr '1l,laUty? / ~ b. Th.cr.atlonofobj.ctlonabt.. odo... ~ c. IUt....tlo.. ot .Ir ...v....nt, -.oi.t'....or t.......r.tl,lre, or.ny chan9. ill ciimat., ..ltll.r loc.lly Or nqlon.l1y? J. ~. IoIilL the propolal nll,llt 1.., ~ ll.. Cha.....e. in Cl,l....e..U 0" the COl,lr.e ot dir.Ctlo.. of ...ter ...v...enU In f...ah...ter.? / / / j b. Ch''''l'...I...b.o..ptlonrat.l, drll.ll1'fjlepatt..rn., or the r.te and ..-lUIt 01 'l,ld.c. ..ater rl,lnolf1 c. Alt.Utl0nt to the COl,l".. or flow of Ilood ..n.r.? d. Chlll'l. In the &OIOu..t ot .ud.c. ...t... In any ...t.r body? .. 01.:l\lr9" I..to al,ld.c. ...t.ra, ,n.lIy.lt..r.tionor.urtlc.....t.r '1u.llty. 11lc1l,ldinQ bl,lt nOt HAlted to t.....r.tur.. dL..ol...d o.yq." or turtlldlty1 j .I t. "Iter.tIOn of the dlreCtlon or r.u' 01 flow 01 'If"OWld ...t..ra? 'i. C}','r>q. 11. th.. Qu.nt.ity at 'irou..d ....t.U. ''It''.... throuqh dl...ct .ddltlona or..lur.dr.....l.,ort"roUQhlnt.~tlon ., .", ....h' >, =U., .....'C"., J -1- h. Subst..ntl..l reductloll in the &llIOUllt of w~t..r oth.......'se aV'll"ble tor publ.c ....t..r .upplle,? 1. Expo,ure d peoph or property to w..t..r ..elated haz.rd. lud'l ~. !loodlnq? 4. Pllnt LUe. Ihll the propoaaI ..nult in, m MAJIlE 1'2. ./ ./ ./ ./ / .. Chan'i.inthedlverutyotspecle., or nwaber of .ny .pec,e. of plants (lnclu'hng tre..., ,hruba, fjI"~... crop., .,crollora and .quatic plallul1 b. Reductioll of the ..umbers of .ny unulue, r.r.ore..danfjler..d.p..ciea ofplonu? c.Introductlonofn....sp..cle.ot plant. into an ~r..i!I., or result ln a bUrler to th.. nor"..l rep)eni.h.-nt ofexl$tl..qe;>eei...? ~. ""hu1 Lll... IflU tha propo.at ruult ill' CI'I~n9" in tehe diversity of specie., or nwohers of any .p~cle. of 4..illah (birdl, land .nu,a1l ineludi"g rept.ile., f1.11 a..d .lIelUuh, benthlC orq4nllllll, 1.....ct.orftllcrof.unl)1 L / b. Reducuon of t.II. numb"r. of any uniqu., ~..nl O~ endan9.r.d .p"c... o( .ni""1I1 e. lntroduction of n.... .pecle. .of 4ni...1I u't.o an .....a, or ~..ult in a barrier to tll" _1qrat.10n or .-.ove- _ntof ani_I.? L ./ I / / / d. Oet..nOnt10n t.o .xl.tuq "lldlUe habit.t? , .. Noi.... 101111 tll" propo.a) r'nult in: (ner..... i.. .:o;i.ti"9 nol.. l.vtlhl b. E"polureofptlopI.to."ver. noi.. l..."I.? 1. ~~~~:~.,;i~~:ht. :~I~):~:/ropo"l .. wnd Ua.. 101111 the propaa.l result In ~4l\tl.l.1t.rationoft.lle pre.....t. or pi.n....d l....d 1,1.. at an .r.al t. lI.tu...l lIesourc.... 'fill the p~opo.al ....,l1tin' .. Inerea... 1n the ...t.. of ua. of .ny ...tll"llre.oure..? I J b. Subat.nth) depletton of .ny nonr..n...able natur.l r...ouree? , " . . . 10. Alsk ot Upset. 0"". t~.. P~"l)D.~1 ,nvolve.. full 01 ,In c~plouon or tlUt nh.n of h.aunlnul 'lIb.t"n~' (1"c:lu41,.... I>lItnot L',"Itcdto, 011. p.lucid..., c:hclIl.cah Or ud,.tlonl i"theeve"tof .".occldental' upset ~nd't1on.: 11. Population. WIll,n" propoul lite. the 10,,->t10n, dLstnb"tLon, denSity. Or qr.....th rate ot th.. hU:Mn popu!,o. tlonot.."lr..l 11. :~~:~~~~ h:~~~n:~" o~r~~:~; :ffeCl d...1WI tor .ddltlon.o! haul In,!,' lJ. Tr"nsPOrt.t.on/Clrclllatlon. 10',11 thlpropo...1 r...ult In, &. C.~..utlon ot IUb'tantlal "dd1- t1on.lvehlcul,rIaOV'U'eflt.1 b. tHlets on ..xutlnq p.orhn'il f..ahu.. or ~....nd for n~ p.rklnq? c. SlIbu..nti.l Llllp,tocl lip.... ..xutln" tr."lportluon IYltflAlll d. Alt..rallon.tOpr.....ntpuc'..J'1\. of clrculatlon or IlQve_nt of peopll ."d/or qood.~ .. Alter.tion. to ...t..rborn., r.tl or &1r tuHic1 t. Jncr".."intr.rt.ch..r.rd.to _torv..hicl,.., bicydlata Or ped..trhn.~ 14. l'ubUc S..rvlcu. 11111 t"'e propo..l n.v...n en.ct Ilpon, Or ..,.ult .n. n..d tor n.... or .Itered '1oyema<lntal ..rvtc.. in "nvot thetollo'f1n'l .or..., .. Flr.prot.ction? b. PoUcaprot.ction? c. Schooh? d. P.rl<.orotherr..:r..tion.l hcll1tl..l .. IC.Ilnt.n.nceotpubllchclI1- U...lnclu.d.ln'lro.d.1 t. 0tII.r"ov.rfUllllllt.l..rvice.1 U. Ennqy, lUll tta.. propo..l ruult In, .. U.. ot lub.t.nti.l aaollnt. of tud or "n.r'IY? b. Sub.t.ntl.l Incr..... In d.."'.nd IlpOn."i.t.n" 10llrcea o! en.r'lY, or requir.tta.d..,.lop...ntotn.... .ourc..ote"er'ly1 U. Utll1tl.... "111 tta" prope..l n.lllt r;:;-;-;;;;;Jforne<ol.v.t.....or .ub.tanU.l .It..ration. to th. follow- inquUUt1e., .. '_.rorn.tlla-.I"...? b. COIIlIlIu.nication. .y.t"'1 c. Wat.r? d. S......ror...ptictanlr..1 '. StoJ'll ....t.r dr..ln.o;I.1 t. SoUd ....t.. and dlapo..U 17. Rwun "e41th. Will the propo..l r..ultln, .. Cre.tion ot .nv "'..Ith h.zard or pot.nU.I ta...lth hu.rd C.."dudin,! ..ntal h..lth)7 b. Expo.llr.. of P<loph to pot.nthl h..h.h I\aurd.l May 25, 19B3 Date YES~~ / I ./ I ~ J I , ~ 7 j 7 "7 j / ~ ~ ~ 7 I 1 ,", "e.thet Ic". Will the propos. I ~...ult ,n the ob~t ructlon of any .c..nlc vht~ or .,...... opnn to th.. pubILc, "r ..i 11 the propo~.l r".ult In the cre.uonor..".....th..tic.llyoff..,...ive .n.. open to pubHc Vie"? YES MAJBE ~ / lO, ll"cre"U"n. Wlll tt...prapo.alr..ault lnan'lIIpactuponthe,!ualityor quantity of ed.t'''~ recre.uonal opportun't IU'~ / ,", ~~~~:~~~~:~{~ i :~o:~c:~ ~ec~~~~n ~~ .. .,.:~, f ,,..~nt "rch..olo",cal or :U"~ll'-'''.. ~a". structure, obj..ct or "'Ji I<li n~ ~ ./ 21. Mandatory I",nd,nqs ofS1qnlf,c..nc... .. eo.,. the prOJect It.ve tll... pot..ntial to dO!qr..de the quaUty Or th" envlro""",nt, lub.tantlallyr..ducethehabitatofa ~hlt or "Ildlife IP"Cle.. c..u.e a fhh Or ..il~I;I" popul.tlon to drOp bel"", .<,Il-~,,~talnLnq levels. threat..n to ell",-jn.,....pl"ntoranirulCOJflllJlln'ty. r..du,,"c the nu.,er or r..ltrict th..ranqe of a r'..e or "n<l....q<'r..d pl..nt or .nl_1 orel...n..tl' l"'Portant..""""le.of the ....)orperLod.ofC..Ufornuh..tory Or pro:!hUtOry? ./ b. 00... th.. project have the potentl..l to ."hl""" .ltort-t.r". to th.. dU.dv..nt.q.. of lonq-tef"l'l envlr.,....,nt.l qoa1s~ ,,, .hort-ter. 'lDpaCt on th" envIronment is one ..hlch OCCUU In a r"l.uvely bri..f. dehniH"e p....od of t",... ...ItH" 10nQ-ter..':np..cts..l11endure....llinto th"fut"r".l j C. OOes the proJect have ".pacll ..h'ch.r",..dlv.duallyli."lt..d,but c"..,ul..t], v..IV co"s,d..r..ble ~ O. proJ"ct ...y ""pa"t on t...o Or ..,r.. ...p.>r.u r"'OUrCe. ..h"r" the l.......ct on each r..our"" u relatlv"ly ......11. but ..Iter" th.. eH"ct of the total of tho." l"'Pact. Oft the envHon...nt is .1"nlhc..nt.1 .I / d. !)o;a. the proJ9Cth.v" ..nvir~nu,1 ..Hect. ..I'lieh ..,11 c.us" Subst..nti..1 .dven" e!fects on hu....n b,,;nqs. ..'th..r dir..ctlvorinda..ctly1 C. OISCUSSION OF EHVIRC.~"'J;::fTA:" EVALU"TION D. DETtIll'\INATIOH Itob<, coq.>ht.dby Ih.. L.e..d ",,"acyl Onth..b..l1.ofth1. Lnlli.I.."al".tion, WI find the propo.o:d project COULD 'lOT It.."e a aignlfic.nt ~H.ct on the envlfon_nt, ..nd . NEGATIVE D!Cl.o\!lo\TION ...illb"prepared. 01 fInd that altholl9'" the propo..." project could h.".. "o;lnlficant .ffect. on the enViron.....nt. th..r....dl not b.. a .i9niHc.nt ..ff..ct In thl. cas.. bec...... the .,tlo;1at1on ,.....sur". de.cflb..d on an ..ttaChed .heet h.v. been add.d to tne I'roJ..ct. ""EGATlVE: DECLAAATIO"l WILL BE P.u;P"R,tD. 01 !ind the propo.ed proj..ct MAl" h.ve . Si<;lnlf1c"nt efl.ct on t.h.. env.ron....nt. .nd an !lIVIJtOt(M.E"l1'.u. IMl'o\C"l' FtZPOJlT h rooqu~r"d. e) -2- - File No. r..ll p ,q'-'2 ENVIRONMENTAL INFOR}~TION FORM A. Applicant's Name: Nillla.'lI Skibsted Address: 1035 s. Fourth Ave, , Arcadia. Ca, 91006 B. Property Address (Location): 42 W. Live Oak Ave. Arcadia, Calif. 91006 C. General Plan Designation: CcmrP.rcial D. ZOne Classification: C-'l E. Proposed Use (State exactly ~hat use is intended for the property, i.e., type, activities, employment): Gt"'\RAGS . F. Square Footage of Site: 24,000 S::.!. Feet G. Square Footage of Existing Buildings: 1. To Remain: 1800 Sq. Ft, 2. To Be Removed: None H. Square Footage of New Buildings: I. Square Footage of Buildings to be Used for: 1. Commercial Activities: I 2. Industrial Activities: r;1r3.q~ 3. Residential Activities: Number of Units: T. On a ~eparate sheet, describe the following: . 1. The environmental setting of the project site as it exists. 2. The proposed alterations to the project site. 3. The use and development of the surrounding properties. -1- " i -- Environmental Information Form K. Check the appropriate answers to the following,questions: Yes No 1. will the proposed project result in a substantial alteration of ground contours and/or alteration of existing drainage pattern? x 2. Will the proposed project result in a change in groundwater quality and/or quantity? x 3. Will the proposed project result in an increase in noise, vibration, dust, dirt, smoke, fumes, odor or solid waste? x 4. Will the proposed project result in the use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials? x 5. Will the proposed project result in a substantial increase in demand for municipal services and/or energy consumption: x Explain in detail any "YES" answers to the above questions on additional sheets. L. P.ovide any additional information which would elaborate on the potential environmental consequences resultant from the proposed project. . M. Certification: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the.facts, statements and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, .s--;U)-~5 Date: ///d?G~ ~ . Signature of Applicant '. -2-