HomeMy WebLinkAbout1365
.
.
.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1365
A RESOLUTION GRANTING MC 88-014, DENYING AN APPEAL
OF THE MODIFICATION COMMITTEE'S APPROVAL OF AN ATTACHED
PATIO STRUCTUR E WITH A 10' -0" REAR SETBACK OF THE SUPPORT
POSTS, AND OVERHANGS TO MAINTAIN A 7' -0" CLEARANCE FROM
THE REAR PROPERTY LINE AT 1619 OAKHAVEN DRIVE.
WHEREAS, on March I, 1988 an application was filed by Mr. Wallace Qua
appealing the Modification Committee's approval of an attached patio structure
with a 10' -0" rear setback of the support posts, and overhangs to maintain a 7 '-
0" clearance from the rear property line, Planning Department Case No. MC 88-014,
on property commonly known as 1619 Oakhaven Drive, more particulary described as
follows:
Lot 8 of Tract 29867, in the City of Arcadia,
County of Los Angeles, State of California, as per
map recorded in Book 291, Pages 35-36 inclusive of
Maps, in the office of said County Recorder.
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on April 26, 1988, at which time all
interested persons were given full opportunity to be heard and to present
evidence;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA HEREBY
RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the factual data submitted by the Planning Department in
the attached report is true and correct.
Section 2. This Commission finds:
1. That the granting of MC 88-014 will not be detrimental to the public
health or welfare, or injurious to the property or improvements in such zone or
vi ci nity.
2. Approval of MC 88-014 would secure an appropriate improvement.
3. The appearance of the attached patio structure with a 10' -0" rear
setback of the support posts, and overhangs which shall maintain a 7'-0"
clearance from the rear property line will be compatible with the neighborhood.
4. That the granting of MC 88-014 will not adversely affect the
comprehensive General Plan.
5. That the use applied for will not have a substantial adverse impact
on the environment.
.
.
.
Section 3. That for the foregoing reasons this Commission denies the
appeal of the Modification Committee's approval of an attached patio structure
with the following conditions:
1. The attached patio structure shall maintain a 10'-0" rear setback
of the support posts, and overhangs shall maintain a 7'-0" clearance from the
rear property line,
2. The attached patio structure shall not interfere with the
accessibility of the Sanitary Sewer Easement and that any such existing
interference shall be remedi ed at the property owner's expense.
3. That MC 88-014 shall not take effect until the owner and applicant
have executed a form available at the Planning Department indicating awareness
and acceptance of the conditions of approval.
Section 4. The decision, findings and conditions contained in this
Resolution reflect the Commission's action of April 26, 1988 and the following
vote:
AYES: Commissioners Amato, Clark, Papay, Szany
NOES: None
A8SENT: Commissioner Hedlund
Section 5. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution
and shall cause a copy to be forwarded to the City Council of the City of
Arcadi a.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was adopted at a regular
meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of May, 1988 by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
A8SENT: None
Commissioners Amato, Clark, Hedlund, Papay, Szany
None
~
on
Chairman, Plan 1n
City of Arcadi a
ATT.EST:
ecretary, Planning Commission
City of Arcadi a
1365
-2-
.
April 26, 1988
TO:
ARCADIA CITV PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
James M. Kasama, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT:
MC 88-014: Appeal of Modificetion Committee's approyel.
GEN~RAL INFORMATIO~
APPELLANT:
Wallace Qua - 1605 Hylend Ayenue
APPLICANT:
Derwin Duncan - 1619 Oakhayen Drive
LOCATION:
1619 Oakhaven On ye
.
REQUEST:
Appeal of Modification Committee's approyal of an attached
potio slruclure with a 10'-0" rear selback of lhe support
posls, and overhangs lo mainlain II 5'-0" clellrllnce from lhe
rellr property line (9252.2.8 and 9292.1.14).
Approximalely 9,350 square feel (0.21 acre)
94.66 feel along Oakhaven Drive
LOT AREA:
FRONT AGE:
EXISTING LAND USE & ZONING;
The subject site is deyeloped wilh a I-slory, single family
dwelling with an attached 3-car garage; zoning is R-l 7,500.
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION:
SF-4, Single-family residential (4 d.u.lacre).
SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING;
.
The surrounding properties are all developed with single
femily residences. The erea is zoned R-l 7,500.
.
BACKGROUND
The Mod1ficatlon Committee (Clark, Bocian and Woolard) at a publlc hearing on
February 23, 19BB, acted to amend and approve request number MC B6-014 to
allow an attached patio structure with a 10'-0. rear setback of the support
posts, and for any overhang to be a minimum 5'-0" clear of the rear property line.
This approval is subject to the condition that the subject structure shall not
interfere with the accessibllity of the Sanitary Sewer Easement and that any
such existing interference shall be remedied at the property owner's expense.
The Modification Committee's decision Is being appealed by the owner of an
adjacent property to the rear. His position and arguments are stated in the
attached presentation.
Findings Of Public Hearing MC 66-0 I 4
.
The applicant was cited by Code Enforcement for construction of the patio cover
without a building permit. The modification is necessary because any portion of
the main dwelling, or any structure attached to it, requires a 25'-0" setback from
the rear property line.
The applicant explained that he wished to locate the support posts 5'-0" from
the rear propertllllne and that there would be no overhang. He also presented
letters of approyal from four (4) neighbors (6I1t1Ch8t1)
The PUblic Works Department confirmed that a 10'-0" wide sanitary sewer
easement is located along the rear of the subject property and that no struc-
ture should be placed upon It.
The Committee did not consider the request unreasonable since the proposal Is
an open patio cover and a detached accessory building could be located only 3'-0"
from the rear property \lne. The Committee, however, cannot approve construc-
tion upon the easement and, therefore, determined that approval of Me 66-014
for a 10'-0" rear setback would secure an appropriate improvement.
.
A\lpal of tI: 88-014
4126/88
P8gIl Z
I.
PLANNING ~OMMISSION'S FINDINGS
Aooroval
If the Planning Commission intends to tllke action to llpprove this appelll, the
Commission should find that llpprovlll of MC 66-014 would not secure lln llppro-
prillte Improvement, nor prevent an unreasonllble hllrdship, nor promote unifor-
mity of development, llnd move to approve this appeal.
Denllll
If the Plllnning Commission intends to tllke llction to deny this llppelll, the
Commission should uphold the Modification Committee's action on MC 66-014
llnd move to deny this llppeal.
.
Attached for your review and consideration are a vicinity map, plot pllln of the
PlltlO cover as built, llnd liS llpproved per cl1llnges lit the Modlf1clltton Hellring,
the Appellllnt's presentatton, and 4 letters In support of the Applicant's request.
Also, the original photographs will be available at the meeting.
.
Appeal of 1'1: 88- 0 1 4
4126/88
Pege 3
.
.
.
", cO' ~.'\ ~ " '../ ~~~. ,
"...:----.'l~1l, ,; _ I .i"'-~~c::." h
~hr '''~ ".~ ~~ ~.. ~I-~ I.
'.. )- i.!I"')~~,.. {o 'K-J-.
." .., ~ Ii ' ~.. >l ~i - .
. :~ ~ ;~..... '~W,~"" l li
., -.'" ~" f l 7(\1-: ............~ t
. ~ .., 'b ~.~ "i: IU.lJ. _. i ~
~ 0"11 l5 \IS. itM. " - t
\- ,~'t '1 I . ''-Y'...\\',..' .: :::.... ...'
.". r ,ll. I __ ~~ .~
,.1" ......... .. ~\"" '1" . . #..
j : .e.~AO~': I..<. ... ,_'" os.. (~';;
.~.~.. "...~~.;.. I ;'{..:.....- - -
ci;.j- j /;1/.,. 1 (I'.) I'J" "1 .... .... I! _t.;.' 1 ~ . ~ .
SAN-rl"\ AINl"rA~. ~ ,0 , . l~~ .., ~ ,~li i1 .
~ ~RACi I If', . ... ~I ""~, ~1 T'
~ I ... II J.. .,1'.1 " '2" ~
~ ~ .L~ i: .., ~ t ... I .;" ~ \._ _-:. l~
~ "'1 K.- tj 1Ir- ~ i it "(\1 d:: : f' , ~ ~\ r' -1J,J
.. "0..: u loOT: 10 --'.J.1..i.Q... ~ I ~1? \-:.- ~~ ~, '\ 'I)
'.. 'I." I ... 0'" ~ "" '';;_ ~ - ,\ .., \.--Y.QL._
,'~ Ll ., U 1 .)":::... G ':::Z:" ~'i.. ... . ,.
.. :\"l#. I . i 'I .-..,.. ~ I ,ji,.: ~ ~\ ~.......,.. r1
.. '}- ....,,::'I'A I ~~. ... Q . .........,. ... ':..' ~....u---
~';' "''''eli' ~,: <(II )3 ' ~.ft .. \ ~~
~ u';j .. !l,i; ..,." "l:. 'i'\I'1" ~ia' ~ ~,Ol ~ '\ ~ ~~ "","
to.;. :"" i ... ~ ":,,... ~,;:. ~L" r:! "'.'l. '
:.~:.. c~::. i""--' ~i< ~. '"
~. I:; ~ 1'0.'1 Ci: 10 'Co ~ : . }-; ,i' ~ :t;.-(O .,..:~ ~, '\ iO
. <(!~ ,~~ l ,,~; G ~~ c ::!11 n ,. "", ~
~~ ~: -' '-. i t u.i ~ ~.:::. ...",,11 ~\X'li~ '" ~
· 'c:: ~~~ ~ ::> :;:;. ~,. ,- 1 .-r~.. :. ~/~. "AI"'"
'-. ~ Q ~~J ; N ;~. ~..' I -'"-'< ~C::. \ ~F~Cii l'. ,It · . ~
:0 I ....I ~ tt." .""",,,,, ,. . 10 ~ a
..' ;:"'0 ":t A';; , s I ,
~. . o/~": (t't,.r:,J: R ~~~ ,~b,pO: ., :KL,.JJL_",,\ ~.~.:~" .~;~/:
~ ' ~. 'L'~ /'1 '-" I. "rp"A:" ~ .. .. \.,,\\
Q ,. "'_'. ,,' -1.11 ~ II \ ,~'\.
,~."... ,.. . ~ ~... ~ - - ,M ~2),,~ \
~ · I~ ( ll) ,. ~" ~r I J. '~
~ lO" I~ ~ ~- \-\:'" \'"' :
: . ~E't ..._\.\.~"
~ ~ ~t-- 0 - I'
~I" -
; <.: · I .. l '/-- "\
.11" Cl.. ."co 5 A N 1- A
I II! , 1 ~ .. -"',
.~c::. r ~ ~~, u-\uNt0I',~J f
..1...__ i =s 4' "'11 1::-0
3'....1 =::1
!J I .JiI.U",U._ ~ 4
I
f..... ,'6
,. I ~A "Ill..' !.
L""' {f": Ii ";~~
-., j ~ ., 'J
{~ - 11 * <\;3 t
, j "
1. ._'1.11- II' ,to, .,..
0"- :
~l I ~,. ~ ~ ., 'Ir Li:'~
..:..'1. 25 "",..0 W ....:::IAolL
. !: i% ; 1!Io: 14 6
~ :3 ~" ~l
... V .\~
.,~ ,~.
..1 N
..' -
!loll'.
..,
.
-=1: "I:
~~
1-
W:RaAL
; u ·
~
,
.
~ t
~ ~ I
,
co l!J
~,
....
D::'
~t
....
1-. .
,
I~
..
I
~
,
"
I
.,. -I
h
-=
.
t
I
,....
SITE VICINITY
SCALE 1.: 200'
o
PROJECT LOCATION
Me 88-0/4
~
NORTH
.
.
.
t
OAKHAVEN n
vR,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ...
I ~
i I
I ~
I 1
: ~
I
I ~
I ~
! ~
:~
-
'"
...
-
- -- - - - - -
.-
,
EX/~-rIN~
;e~D/!IVt:e
I I
I t
I "'?-f'I'",r,C'; _ I POOl..-
_ _ _ _'- I
'a I ---~-~--
;;, I
.A: .1.
--"
SS'
\ \
\
\
;::na:: .:r r:.a.,=
PAtIO COVER
AS {3()Il:r
.
o
~
/6/"1 ()AJ< HAVEN OR.
t1C 1313-0/4-
D 6CAL.e: /":: Z.O'
.
.
.
t.
"
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I f...
I ~
I ~
I ....
I 'Il
I ~
I ~
I ~
I ~
I
I
I ~
I ~
: ~
I I/'j
: ~I ---
I I
L-~
OAI<HII YEN
-- --
Ex/~-r/Alc;
1i:~/DI!:Nce
I I
I <;-f'P~:-'7 ~ I
,.( I
_1..__-- -"'r -......,
I . I
~ _ _ _ _ J_ ~..... ~ I
^ \',
pool.-
/
s;r;&e: ::r ~""F I
-...-
8~' ,.
\ \
\
\
PA -r 10
C()VER.
A$ APPROVED BY
HODlflCA -rION COMNI rrEE.
[?R,
"0
:::
'"
/6/'! OAK HAVEN 01<.
t1C 88-011-
D 6CAL&: /": 20'
.
.
APPELLANT'S PRESENTATION
.
.
~H~~~.veD
MAR 0 1 1988
I'!;'( q, tlll;.lllt
lll,tIi!lIIlllPI,".
WALLACE C. QUA
1605 HYLAND AVE.
ARCADIA. CALIFORNIA 91006
29 February, 1988
city of Arcadia
Building & Planning Dept.
Subject: Request for Denial of Variance
1619 Oakhaven Drive
.
Gent lemen I
Please accept this letter as request
variance for the referenced address.
the preliminary approval.
Not only was the construction begun without permit, but
it extends the main structure nearly to the property line
and is inconsistent with city building codes.
for denial of the
We hereby appeal
Additionally, it is inconsistent with the neighborhood
and could well affect adjacent property values negatively.
Please see our earlier submission for details.
Thank you for your consideration.
sincerely,
~0~~
Wallace Qua
.
.
.
Wt\LL,ACE C. CUr
1605 Hyl,,,NC ;. 'IE,
ARCADIA. C,A,L!F::=<.~I\,A. ~'':'':b
23 Februarj, 1988
Building Depar~ment
Ci:.:r 0: ~~ ~c3dia
Subject: 1619 Oakhaven Drive
Unapproved. ~on-code Construction
Denial of Variance Request
Gentlemen:
:i'e must formally protest any attempt at approval of va riance
for such a gross deviation from city code and area standards.
It is not acceptable.
Reducing the code requirement or 25 feet to 5 feet is incon-
ceivable, especially as no significant purpose is served.
.
Code standards were carefully designed to prevent haphazard
development of the city. They should be followed unless public
need for variance can be clearly established.
Disregard of these code requirements can only serve to degrade
quality of the city and neighborhood.
There can be no justification of one party infringing on the
rights of others, especially by whim or without inquiring of
the city and affected individuals.
There is no visible pUblic benefit for this variance approval.
To the contrary, there are very good reasons for denial--
respect for the code ,and 'community we~l-being ~itft~t prive-
lidge for a few.
The structure is unsightly and impinges on treasured views of
our mountains too. As built, it is less than 2 feet from the
property line.
Attempting to force the physical structure on others--without
either notice, discussion, or complying with the code intent,
is simply far beyond what can be reasonably accepted.
We firmly object to any variance approximating that which is
requested.
.
Sincerely,
w c:JQtJ ~ ~
..
1-
2.
3 .
4.
5.
6 .
7.
.
OBSERVATIONS
Code for R-1 zone requires a 25' setback from adjacent rear
property lines. Reference Code Sec. 9252.2, Lines 13-16. *
~he requested variance approval is wholly inconsistent with
surrounding properites.
Structure was built without permit and stopped only upon
neighbors inquiry.
Structure as built is less than two feet from property line.
No discussion is known to have occurred with neighbors or
city before commencing construction.
As-built structure utilizes virtually all of the setbach space,
approximately 25 of 27 feet of yard.
Earth fill of 2 feet in back yard raises structure accordingly,
making it more visible still, especially with proposed neglible
setback.
8. Question--Was building permit obtained for first expansion?
9. Non-compliance can negatively affect surrounding propery
values.
10. Code Section 9252 REAR YARD states that "There shall be a rear
yard of not less than twenty-five (25) feet (7.62 meters)."
11. Natural grade in this part of the city makes this structure
more visible than evident on area plat. This back yard has
been raised two feet with fill.
.
* .....all additions...and structures shall comply with the
regUlations set forth in this title."
RECEIVED
FES 2-! 1988
.
CI;-Y OF ."CAOI'"
P:""\IiNrNG !)EPT
REQUEST FOR DENIAL
OF VARIANCE
1619 0/\ KHA VEN DRIVE
Arcadia, California
.
Non-complying construction of a widely
unapproved construction in an R-1 zone
without permit has been essentially
finished framing. It is in total
violation of the Coce rear setback re-
quirements of 25 feet at 1-1/2 feet.
It is also unsightly, and blocks valued
view of the mountains. No justification
whatever can be seen for approval of
request for such gross variance.
Submitted to Arcadia Building Department
.
Public Hearing
23 February, 1988
..
?eb~uary 23t 1388
:::t., of .\r-:::adia
~u~lci~c ; ~lanni~~ ~e~art~ent
~e:"e!:'er.ce--"'otice !:'ecar1ina new buildinq addition at
161'1 Oakh'aven Drive Arcadia
Gantlemen:
~he buildina addition near us on Oakhurst deviates f!:'om
code ~ore than we believe is allowable or proper.
mhis bui~dina extension makes too much of a chance from
homes lone existina in this area, and we feel it"could
well lead to undesirable orecedents. In a larae area, no
cac~ yard is left, and it also visually infringes on
ne::...':!;,=ors.
.
It is imoortant to ~eeo the character of a community in-
tact and not have it dearaded bit bv bit. Enlarging one
house so close to others is unreasonable. The Arcadia
buildina code should be followed to retain a yard of
reasonable size and seoaration from neiahbors, This will
also better maintain orooerty values for all of us in
the area, not a small concern.
Therefore, we must register our o?oosition to the ap?ro-
val of this variance.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
George Powell
1617 Hyland Avenue
Arcadia, california
.
.
February 23,1988
To Arcadia Planning Department
I, owner of record of the property listed as
1569 Hyland Avenue. Arcadia, California,
hereby permit Mr. Wallace C. Qua to voice my
opinion in matters of housingi home design
pertaining to the street known as Hyland
Avenue, which affects my best interest
aesthetically and personally.
.
!It:e~.;/ lJa1 ~~
Alice L. Deliman
~ ~~;U ~=fJ'~~ 1~~
~~lQ~, ". ~
~.k~<W-I It(f a~~,
.
::'~'~..,", "
.,~,' il., .'
"~;"':i*' ,. ';~.
- "
..:' ~.
.
.
.. ::.
':" t'l"
, ." " .'. .
. "
, "f. ~"','
-.,i', .
'. "
. . I
" . y-..a
.
.
,. f~;'~:':,
,~ NORTH
]
,~
~~~-:'!""
4;
~
H
Z
4;
~
4;
Ul
.
.
.
t
,
,
I
I
I
,
I
I
I ""
I ~
I ~
: ~
: ~
: ~
I
.:-1'
! ~
:\
Prop.
Line
~
1'6" ~
NOTE GIVE]\;
CLEARANCE
...........
-
.
.
, "R,
1J(J~'1"'INt;
.t641Il&Nc6
\
Drawing & Data from Arcadl.'a B' ,
Ul.ldl.ng Dept.
OJtKIM".N
First Extension
of House to S.
.",. .. ..- - - - - - --- - - - - - - - -
!:'\/F\%\f:':\%:\,\\{;:\U
:.. ........,....'41
11'\
\
\
Actual
Second
Addition
NO Permit 0188
(Constructed)
-
...
NORTH
~
...
Origina:
S. Wal:
25' Code ~
Setback ~
Prooert'.
Lin~ '
"11 tWKM"v&ol D/l.
t1C 18-0If
~GAI..t: r, Z,O'
.
.
.
..,
.'
pi !JrdWn i1::i Cunt:lt rue I ud 01 Utl "
.
,
I N EW S'I. I<lJL:'I'1 II< I':
:
No pe nni I 01 B lJ
I F I HS'I' S ECONlJ
EXTENS 1 UN ~ EXTENS llJN -:!
. ~JJ1
, :;:::;;:;-::::;:::::::::::::::::;:::::;:::::;:::::::;:::;:::;:::::::::::;:;:;:;:::::;:::::;:::::::;:;:::;:::;:::::::::::::;:;:;:;:;:;:::;:::::;:;:::;:;:::::::::;:;:::::;:::;:::;:;:;:::;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;::::::::
I
I
I -
.
,.,
'u -
..
~
,
.~ , ,
U ,0
0 .-
.....
: ,"'1 .>::
( ,
~'~:..:.:.'.....:.. 0' .... <I . ...... ....."........ ,..:.........;.~....~.;..:;...:-;:-:...~;:!~.::...~<.:;::..;;::~:.::...::o':....;;.....,~~~4.!:.::~~~:t~:-:..~,:!.::..~.o, U
.....
....0...... .... ......', ~._:.:' ~ ..-:...... ......... 0; ....' ". '.' _...tt..... .t... Of: :. ~ ,.' ~ -. ,Q'J '-. . oil .....;.. ......... .... , Natural Grade' ,", L:l
0' o.~ ~ -:- "'. ~:~ ':.' ...'. . t :.. ...0.... '.. -4.' 0':: . .......:: ,. _1; ;...'....~.:...:..;,. .,::.,:~, ~ ...: :. :" ";, ~-"':"~.~7"" . ' - '.: ~o. =0;.
~.' .! .'. ..,-...' .,.P..,,: ...... .......;. .... ,... ......,......0.. ....#.. -..~ '0." ..C1..~'" ,,0. -. . ..~~~~~f'I'!..l""!*!"d-i
1~r;i:.!!~!(:;'11tfJ;i~i11~ir1jjf(W&1;~.r~';~;0;j~~;0;;;~j;;rs't!;:it't:~~t.htrA;;.;~;H~. . ~ .
":;:~.
,. .,
.'. .
'.
"'."'. ,
0'" ..... .... . . ~ .. ~;t":".. .. .... "".~,.~ ~_." '.. .. \..... . ... .~.. ..........0. ... .... .'~' . D', "'1 J . ..!.. ..' . Q' . .'. ". .' .~.. . I" ,., ".... . ,.. .',
. .....01'.........: .....:................:.:.. .....:. ~..... ..."._. I'. " _, '-." .......
.
lCl
/'I'l
25' Cod~ ...................a.a..........................
Stolt baCK .
Line" IN'rt:Cl<AL S1'I<UC'1'lJI<AL I>X'I't::NS ION
1
.~
>,
ClJ
O. ill
01:
>"M
p.,....l
t
IHIt:'111
--
.1'"/11
l' L 1 ..
t :
t G
N
: .....
0
. "
0 <Xl
.
IJ)
..
"
_.1_
~~jif;]~[m)ti.1.:i
"
"
!.
.
'.
;.
,
1
r-i
1U,ll:
s::u
'~.B
'r! ...,
... III
OUl
:>:,Lll
UN
ClJ 2l QI
'U +' I: '1'owa rd East
o QI'M
()lIli VARIANCE REQUESTED .
~..............................................
1619 Qakhdv~n !Jr.
;.,
+'
>,
ClJ
o.ClJ
01:
>"M
p.,..1
'*
Sectional view
.
.-
'~'lh~.....,~
.~
'''i,'1 ......... '\
-~A .
...
'"
.,
...
~
:c
.
.....
'"
"
:l
...
...
...
D.
.
a. Height of new
:onstr-uction is
12 :eet a hove
original grade.
~lote extens ion 0
rod on top of ne
structure at :'2
feet above orig-
inal grade
A. [ntegral
Sl: ructural
construction
& attachment
to main building.
view to northeast.
Note overall bulk
of new construc-
tion obscuring
view of mountains
c. Top of new _all
is at 8 feet abo'
original grade.
Two feet of fill
....as used.
:>lew roof nearly
overhangs .all
on property line.
view to north.
D. Rod extension
shows 12 foot
height above
original grade.
E. Continuation
of existing
structure to
south.
Sheer bUlk of new
construction blocks
view.
view tn nnr+~VOQr
.
..,.
'"
.,
-<
-<
.;ie.... to....ard i::ast, along property line wall,
:llustrates closeness of both roof and
':ert ical members to wall. Code setback
~s ~pproximately at wall on left.
.
,\ ~
:::::!
""
~
H. 12'
roof _
'leiljht.
r. 8'
:.{all
height
above
. LI"l
or1g. 11<
grade.
'n
:J
..,
~
....
.
l' 6- Per Arcadia
city Building
Department records.
View toward West along property line vall,
roof is only 1'6- ~rOM wall, per city o~_
Arcadia Building Department dra....ing.
Variance ....ould be required for entire structure.
Top of :"00:
is 12 :eet
above odq-
inal grace.
Post-to-
property
line dis-
tance is
'..-ell un-
der 5'.
Integral
struct ural
const ruct io,
&. attachmen'
to main
building"
..
.
LmERS IN SUPPORT OF APPLICANT'S REQUEST
.
.
Fi: r,.' C' "',
.. ,. l:" I II E:
;:-~
FEB 21 1988
R. M. Canzoneri
1627 Oakhaven Drive
Arcad~a, CA 91006
CT.-, c.p ..'t.- \0
...~.HIN',\:('. ;,~~~'"
February 5. 1988
?lanning Comm~ssion
City of Arcadia
240 W. Huntington Drive
Arcadia, CA 91006
Atten: Planning Members
Dear Sir:
I am writing to indicate my approval of the patio cover
being constructed by Mr. & Mrs. Darwin Duncan located at
1619 Oakhaven Drive.
.
We are neighbors one house removed on the same side ot the
street. This work is in keeping with the character of our
neighborhood and is being professionally done in the h~ghest
of quality. The results will prove to be an enhancement to
not only the Duncan residence but to the ent~re
neighborhood.
I encourage the board to approve the Duncan request for a
deviation in the rear set back dimension to 5 feet as this
type of open construction will not result in a closed in
feeling.
Sincerely ~ours,
'/?/7J
eri
.
.
.
.
2-17-87
To: Arcadia Planning Department
R ,:- c'
.. "~'\lEO
FEB 23 1988
Gentlemen:
Cl'T"VOFo\
PL..\~ "fc....Of...
IklNG nEPT
Darwin Duncan whose property is located
applying for a variance in order to put
rear of his house.
at 1619 Oakhaven Dr. is
in a patio cover at the
Mr. Duncan has my approval for this variance. It will not only
add value to his house, but also to all the other homes on the
street.
I recommend the City to approve this variance.
Thank you for your consideration.
...xi ~df ~.J4-?-'l--~-' c.r
Samuel Passamano
1631 Oakhaven Dr.
Arcadia, Calif. 91006
.
.
.
February 18, 1988
P.>:'(.,_
, ..... :. I \I e: n
FEB 23 1988
To the City of Arcadia
Planning Department
;''''''.:IF "1:,<:"0'"
UNNtN('; nl!P'T'"
Gentlemen,
Mr. Darwin Duncan whose property is located at 1619 Oakhaven Dr.,
Arcadia has applied for a variance in order to install a patio
cover at the rear of his house.
I hereby give my approval for the variance for a 5 foot setback
from the rear of the property,
Yours truly,
(" j , (j . q,.., '(,./", ~. \.
u 71 tu..J&1. tJ C/VL ~v0'
Charles Mc Carthy .
1610 Oak haven Dr.
Arcadia, Calif. 91006
.
.
..
2-18-1988
F* ,~: (" ".. "
.. >r.'. j l/ E r-
,.1
FEB 23 1988
To: Arcadia Planning Department
C1'l""rc,r
~U'''N -:-q::"l.Jr...
Ii"liG nrp.~
Gentlemen;
I am the owner of the property located at 1623 Oakhaven Dr, Arcadia.
My property is adjoining the property at 1619 Oakhaven Dr.
Mr. Darwin Duncan is applying for a variance for a patio cover.
The materials he is using is of top quality and is being done
in a professional manner.
I approve of the variance.
Yours truly,
. . -:>
~ ./~Q~
~/~ab;i~l~~Oli yf
1623 Oakhaven Dr.
Arcadia, Calif. 91006