HomeMy WebLinkAbout1355
.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1355
A RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88-001 TO
CONSTRUCT A 120-SUITE HOTEL AT 321 EAST HUNTINGTON DRIVE.
WHEREAS, on December 21, 1987 an application was filed by Residence Inn
(Marriott, Inc.) to construct a 120-suite hotel, Planning Department Case No.
C.U.P. 88-001, on property commonly known as 321 East Huntington Drive, more
particularly described as follows:
Parcel 1 of Parcel Map No. 18980, in the City of
Arcadia, County of Los Angeles, State of California.
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on January 12, 1988, at which time all
interested persons were given full opportunity to be heard and to present
evidence;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA HEREBY
RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
~ SectiOn 1. That the factual data submitted by the Planning Department in
the attached report is true and correct.
Section 2. This Commission finds:
1. That the granting of such Conditional Use Permit will not be
detrimental to the public health or welfare, or injurious to the property or
improvements in such zone or vicinity.
2. That the use applied for at the location indicated is properly one
for which a Conditional Use Permit is authorized.
3. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to
accommodate said use. All yards, spaces, walls, fences, parking, loading,
landscaping and other features are adequate to adjust said use with the land and
uses in the neighborhood.
4. That the site abuts streets and highways adequate in width and pavement
type to carry the kind of traffic generated by the proposed use.
5. That the granting of such Conditional Use Permit will not adversely
affect the comprehensive General Plan.
.
.
6.
That the use applied for will not have a substantial adverse
impact on the environment.
Section 3. That for the foregoing reasons this Commission grants a
Conditional Use Permit to construct a 120-suite hotel upon the following
condi tions:
.
1. That the following
Department of Public Works shall
Director of Public Works.
A. Submit grading and drainage plan prepared by a registered
civil engineer subject to the approval of the Director of
Public Works. Provide calculations for both the gravity
drainage system and the pump drainage system. Computations
should show hydrology, hydraulics, elevations, and all the
details requested on the City's "Pump Drainage" sheet.
B. Arrange for underground utility service and dedicate easements
to utility companies.
Obtain storm drain connection from L. A. County Department of
Public Works.
Complete all public works improvements as shown on the
construction drawings prepared by Emkay Development for Parcel
Map 18980 and comply with all the provisions required by
CALTRANS for the State Encroachment Permit in Huntington Drive
and L. A. County Public Works Department for any storm drain
conditions as outlined in the report
be complied with to the satisfaction
from the
of the
C.
D.
COnnect ions.
NOTE: All survey monuments, centerline ties and survey
reference points shall be protected in place or re-
established where disturbed. This work will be the
responsibility of the permittee and shall be at the
permittee's expense.
2. Fire safety shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Fire
Chief.
3.
144 parki ng
That a modification be granted for 130 parking spaces in lieu of
spaces required.
.
1355
-2-
.
.
.
4. With the exception of the number of required parking spaces, the
parking area shall comply with all code requirements. Said revised plan shall be
submitted to the Planning Department for its review and approval.
5. That an access easement and maintenance agreement be executed and
recorded between the Residence Inn and Hampton Inn.
6. That a 42" high wrought iron fence or wall shall be permitted
around the perimeter of the property. If a masonry wall is constructe around the
perimeter of the property, landscaping shall be provided on both sides of said
wall.
7. That the planting material in the landscape buffers adjacent to
Santa Clara Street and Second Avenue shall include shrubs and ground cover as
well as the turf and trees proposed on the landscape plan.
8. That the design and use of materials for the storage building and
equipment building shall be consistent with the design of the other buildings.
9. That C.U.P. 88-001 shall not take effect until the owner and
applicant have executed a form available at the Planning Department indicating
awareness and acceptance of the conditions of approval.
10. Noncompliance with the provisions and conditions of this
Conditional Use Permit shall constitute grounds for the immediate suspension or
revocation of said Permit.
Section 4. The decision, findings and conditions contained in this
Resolution reflect the Commission's action of January 12, 1988 and the following
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Commissioners Amato, Clark, Papay, Szany
None
Commissioner Hedlund
Section 5. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution
and shall caus~ a copy to be forwarded to the City Council of the City of
Arcadi a.
1355
-3-
.
.
.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was adopted at
meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of January,
followi ng vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSE NT:
a regular
I 988 by the
None
Commissioners Amato, Clark, Hedlund, Papay, Szany
None
ATTEST:
tlf4/UY,4,,/
Secretary, Plannlng Commission
City of Arcadi a
-
-4-
Commi ss ion
1355
. January 12, 19&&
:
TO: ARCADIA CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DONNA L. BUTLER, SENIOR PLANNER
CASH NO.: C.UP. 88-1
GENERAL INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
REQUEST:
.
LOT AREA:
FRONTAGE:
Residence Inn (Marriott, Inc.)
32 1 !ast Huntington Drive
Conditional Use Permit to consttucta 120 suite hotel
136.0&5 (3.17 acres)
655.53 feet on Santa Clara street
92.67 feet on second Avenue
EXISTING LAND USH & ZONING:
The subject property is vaeant; zoned CPO-I.
SURROUNDING LAND US! & ZONING:
NORnI:
SOUnl:
EAST:
WEST:
..
Vaeant; zoned CPO-l
Vacant, and developed With Arcadia Nissan and the
Embassy SUites Hotel; zoned CPO-l and CPO-l & H
respectively
Dtveloped with the Arcadia Wash; zoned CPO-I
Developed With industrta1 uses; zoned M-I & 0
C.UP.88-1
January 12, 19M
P'age I
. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION:
Planned Development-l
PROPOSAL
Builditlg
The applicant is proposing to construct a 120 suite hotel. There will be 15
suite buildings, a gatehouse, storage building. and equipment building.
Each suite building is comprised of 8 units induding 6 studio suites (48~!t. sq.
ft each) and 2 suites WiUl a bedroom loft (74~ sq.ft each). AU units have
kitchen fadlities. There will be a total of 90 studio suites and 30 suites wiUl
a bedroom loft Three of Ule 120 suites will be designed for handicap
persons.
The gatehouse contains Ule registration area, admifll$tra.tive offices, a
hospitality room WiUl an occupancy of 34 and a conference room WiUl au
o<x:upancy of 24. The hospitality room and conference room are available for
. guest use only.
Plans have not been submitted for Ule storage building or equipment
building.
The buildings will be wbite stucco WiUl dark brown trim and siding. The
roof will be dark brown concrete tite. The doors to Ule individual suites will
be orange colored. A mutti-colored awning will cover Ule entryway.
The suite buildings are two stories, 33 feet in height and Ule gatehouse ts
two stories, 32'-6".
The building setbadts range from 10'.0" to 15'-0" along Ule interior property
lines. There is a 16'-0" setback from Ule Second Avenue property line and a
miflimum setback a 45'-6" setback from Ule Santa aara street property line.
There will be no beverage or fOOd services on Ule premises. A swimming
pool and sports court will be available for Ule guests.
.
C.UP. ,'8-1
January 12, il988
Page 2
.
Parkjng
Based upon the parking ratio of 1.2 spaces per guest room, 144 parking
spaces are required. The proposed projedhas 130 spaces 0.08 spaces per
guest room) including 11 compact spaces and six handicap spaces.
The parking layout complies with code with the exception of the 15'-0. wide
driveway adjacent to the compact spaces along Santa Clara Street. Code
requires a 20'-0. wide driveway.
Access to the parldng area will be from two driveways. one ingress and
egress driveway will be on Santa Oara Street; a second driveway on Sallta
aara Street will be for egress only. The primary entrance to the site will be
from a driveway off the private access drive wbic:h extends from the
proposed street located east of the proposed SOuplantation Restaurant.
This access drive will be utilized for ingress and egress to both the Residence
Inn and Hampton Inn. In order to facilitate the use of this drive, an access
easement and maintenance agreement should be eJlllCUted and recorded.
between the Residence Inn and the Hampton Inn.
.
T .andscaRiflg
The CPD-l zone requires a minimum of 101 of the lot to be landscaped, SI of
wbicb. must be located within the parking area. The landscaping exceeds
code reqUirements.
The areas between the buildings and around the perimeter of the buildings
will be landscaped.a
The CPD-l zone requires a 10'.0. landscape buffer adjacent to public streets.
The landsCape area along Santa Clara Street ranges in width from 8'-0. to <}'-
3.. This area includes the car overhang. resulting in a net dimension of 1)'-0..
The landsCape area adjacent to Second Avenue has a minimum width of
16'-0. with a large landscape berm at the corner of Second A venue and
Santa Clata Street.
The planting material proposed for this area is turf and trees.
.
C.UP. 88-1
January 12, 1988
Page 3
.
~
A 6'-0" high masonry wall is proposed along Ule wash (easterly propert:r
line). The Embassy Suites has a 6'-0" high masonry wall which abuts Ul,~
subject property along a portion of Ule souUler1y and westerly property line.
The applicant is proposing a 42" high wood pic:lc.et fence around Ule
perimeter of Ule property (except where Ule walls are existing and
proposed). It appears from Ule plan that this fence will be located on Ule
property line.
<\tg1Iing
A wall sign is proposed on Ule gatehouse building.
The site plan indicates free standing signs at Ule driveway entrances,
however, no details have been submitted. All signs will be subject to design
reView by Ule P1:.nning Department staff.
.
SPECIAL INFQ.RMA1lQli
A Disposition and Development Agreement was executed between Emka)7
Development and Ule City of Arcadia on November 17, 1967 for Ule
construction of two hotels, including Ule Residence Inn.
Because Ule proposed hotel is within Ule Redevelopment Area, Ule plans are
subject to review by Ule Redevelopment Agency.
ANALYSIS
The hotel is a permitted use in Ule CPD-l zone wiUl an approved conditiconal
use permit. The proposed plan is consistent wiUl Ule Disposition and
Development Agreement entered into wiUl Emkay on November 17, 196'7.
Staff does not believe that Ule 14 space parking deficiency will create a
par1dng prOblem at Ule proposed hotel. The hotel does not have dining
facilities or banquet rooms, Ulerefore, Ule parking will be limited to guests
staying at Ule hotel and botel employees.
.
C.UP. M-l
January 12, 1.966
Page 4
.
The driveway area adjacent to the compact spaces should be designed b)
comply with code. This can be accomplished with a minor l'hAnge in the.
parking layou~
In regards to the landscape butfer along Santa Clara street, althoU8h the.
CPD-I zone requires a 10'-0" landscape setback, the parking regulations
require only a 5'-0" butfer between a street and a parking area. Staff fE.els
that the minimum 6'-0" wide butfer is an adequate width to provide thE~
necessary sc:reening between the parking area and Santa Clara street It is
our opinion, however, that the proposed landscape material, turf and trHS is
insufficient and we would recommend that the landscape areas along both
Santa Clara Street and Second Avenue indude shrubs and ground cover as
well as the turf and trees indicated on the landscape plan.
Staff does not believe that the 42" high WOOd fence is appropriate in a
commercial zone. A WOOd fence deteriorates quickly and can beCOme
\1n~gJlUy if not properly maintained. If the purpoee of the fence is to
restrict access to the site, staff recommends that a wroU8ht iron fence wltJl
brlCk or masonry pilasters be installed. A masonry Wall woUld also be
acceptable, however, the wall would have to comply with the City's visibility
standards. A wrought iron fence or masonry wallis more durable and Diore
desirable in a commercial zone.
.
If the Commi~Qn determines that the wood fence is appropriate or if Ulle
applicant wishes to construct a masonry wall, said fence or Wall shoUld t>e
constructed to provide for landscaping on both sides of the Wall or fence.
This woUld provide for a more attractive appearance along the streets lUl
well as in the interior parking area.
An EIR for the Em1r.ay miJIed-use commercial development addresses th4t
proposed development of a hotel on the subject site. This EIR was certifiled
by the ApncJon November 17, 1967. No further environmental action is
nacesn,,~ ~
ARCHlIEfURAL DiSIGII RiVIEW
Concurrent with the consideration of tbis conditional use permit, the
PlAnning Commission may approve, conditiona11y approve or deny the
applicant.s design concept plans.
~
C.UP.6&-1
January 12, 19&&
~lge 5
. It is staff's opinion that the applicant.s proposal complies With the intent of
the design criteria set forth in the City's Ardlitedura1 Design ReView
Regulations.
The use of palms in the landscaping design proVides a continuity of
development With the existing and proposed developments in the area.
~
The Planning Department recommends approval of C.UP. 88-1 subject t() the
folloWing conditions:
1. Conditions as outlined in the attached report from the Departmen1t of
Public Works shall be complied with to the satisfaction of the Director
of Public works.
2. Fire safety shall be prOVided to the satisfaction of the Fire Chief.
3. That a modification shall be granted for 130 parking spaces in lieu of
144 parXing spaces required.
.
4. With the exception of the number of required parking spaces, the
parking area shall comply with aU code requirements. Said reVisE!d
plan shall be submitted to the PlAnning Department for its reView and
approval.
5. That an access easement and maintenance agreement be eJI9(Ut,ed and
recorded between the Residence Inn and Hampton Inn.
6. That a 42". wrought iron fence or wall shall be permitted arolmd
the penmetM of the property. If a masonry wall is permitted around
the perimetM of the property, landscaping shall be proVided on both
sides of said waI1
7. 'fIlat tile plantfna mat.ena1 in the landscape buffers adjacent to ~Ilta
Clara Street and second Avenue shall include sbrubs and ground rover
as well as the turf and trees proposed on tile landscape plan.
.
C.UP. 88-1
January 12, 1988
puge 6
.
8. Tbat tIl9 design and use of materials for the storage building and
equpiment sIIa11 be CODSiStent with the design of the other buildiDigS.
9. TbatC.UP. 68-1 sIIa11 not take effect until the owner and applicant
ba"e eJlllC\lted a form available at the Planning Department indica:tmg
awareness and acceptance of the conditions of approval.
10. Noncompliance with the proVisions and conditions of this Conditional
Use permit sIIa11 constitute grounds for the immediate suspension or
revocation of said Permit
FINDINGS AND MOTIONS
Approval
If the ptatln1ng Commission intends to take action to approve this projec1t, the
Commission should find that the design concept plans are in compliance with
the ADR criteria and direct staff to prepare the appropriate resolution
incorporating the specific findings and conditions of approval set forth iJ:1 the
staff report (or as modified by the Commi$$ion).
.
Denial
If the P1a1'ning CommiS$lon intends to take action to deny this project, tIlle
Commission should move to deny and direct staff to prepare an appropriate
resolution incorporating the Commission's decision and findings in support of
that dects.1on. The Commi!'l!'lton may wtsb to consider the foUowing findings
in regards to architectural design Wbicb must be expanded upon with
specific reasons for denial:
D.l Find that thetocaUOD and configUration of the structures are not
vis08I1y IIarmoDious with their sites and with surrounding sites aJlld
$I:i~es, an4 tbat the structures dominate their surroundings to an
eJtMat ~te to their use.
'"
D.2. Pind.tbat tile arcIIitAlctura1 design of tile structures and their matel:'ials
and colors are not Visua11y harmonious with surrounding
development.
. C.UP.3&-1
January 12, 1:9&8
Page 7
.
0,3. Find that the planS for the landscaping of open spaces do notcontorm
to Ule requirements set forth in Ule code, and that Uley do not pr,ovide
visually pleasing settings for structures on Ule sit& and on adjoining
and nearby sites and conflict WiUl Ule natural landscape.
0.4. Find that Ule design and location of signs and Uleir materials and
colors are not consistent WiUl Ule character and scale of Ule buildiings
to wtrlch Uley are attached or wtrlch are located on Ule same sit&, and
that Ule signs are not visually harmonious WiUl surrounding
development
.
0.5. Find that Ule architectural design does not enhance Ule Visual
environment of Ule city, preserve and protect property values an.:!
miUgat& against degradation and depreciation.
0.6. Find that Ule proposal does not promot& and protect Ule health, safety,
comfort and general \lIeUare of the community and does not promlOt&
the standards of appearance in the community or encourages the
appropriat& use of land Within the City.
0.7. Find that the proposed expenses of fiat building walls eJX:eed 25 feet
in Width Without providing architectural indentations and/or
prOjections so as to provide opportunity for shade, shadow, and vi.sua1
relief.
o.a Find that long straight driveways and walkways are not miUgate<ll
tbrough curvi1ineer approaches, landscaping and Chlllflges in t&xtulre
and/or colors.
0.9. Find that the walkways have not been designed to mlnlml~ viSU8t1
intrusion into adjoining properties.
.
C.UP. &8-1
January 12, 1988
P'dge&
.
1;"'"$ANI...Q.....,., sr.
.'
~..
('__III Nnt"..
._............_a......_
....:-........ ... ~..... ........ . ~ ..
. _=- w..:":"'_ _.,: --. -:......-___
--:0==_:::1''=-'- .....
---
..._-.-.........-_..~.
__...... - _..-............-
.. --...... -...... --..
.....~------!"......
-
~_. ,.
. --
. -- . --
0 . -
-- . -
0
~ ~~~[Q)8~
~1E~n(Q)IEINI~~ IINIINl
lAHllSCAP[ CONCEPT PlAH
=--;r
---
a
.
~
.
SCAlf .. fD1
----..
.
..
-
~
-==
~
5.~=-
==--
~
it
.::a
....~
.-......
.:..
L-1
l
.
r ......IlM. CAI60RHIA ..._
I,ITI ARCHITECTURAL PLAN
~ '"-
1
~~---s
nr
I
.
--
.
... ---
-..........
.---,
.....----.--
-
..--.-
.-.....-
L=-
&i
-
--...--.---
..--.-
._...~....-
__ _W~. "@I
--
-
_w
~..:r.'C.'--
- -...
...-.-...
~_,__ a Ii. E
--
----
~".
:..-.. ....
--........ ..
__.~.- If...
........~.. .-
- - ..-----
......... -----
- -.......
.... ."--
------
}
---
......;').
:;~-:t J
~.
-~.
....
f,J.'- -:
~
--.J) II L 1:::--1
:/" '--
-
fa
--
..-.-
-:"""'--
-
rENtCI!..
III
."==l":..
....-....:-ca
~-
~"JfT~_
..
--... ....
'-' .---
e
.
.
0r~
@
@
...--...
---
.---.
___w
-_........
1
@
~
A
ELEVA lION
,/~_"4
-+~ ::;.
'-+r-r.r'
..~
. =:.. TWii
-1---
IL. .....
. .
iB
-.
.'
..
t--0--t
Ute Of' ....,. .
...... . .......
~EAST '~LEVATIONI
-.-
-
.
.
-@
-Q)
....
,.....
kllO. .&f'1at
2
~
2
-
.'
~ . \
,
.
~~
A
ELEVA TION
..,.. .. .-
~..,,-'.'M&.
--- :=. == ~- .. .....
r_ r= L==.~
I
--'>I
1/'- . '"-0"
II
..
..
<I
.
.
.'
.<t~
.c./. .
Co ..
4l!4 .." .
U1. OL.
....
.
...
,
&WEST ELEVATION
lIil"!'.f-.
-+Z"VIiIf
-1~
.......... 'l'
~
,..... .....-. ...
:. :~\ ': I
..1 .
.
..
.
.
---<D--
~
~
<;>/
'IIIIf;"'._
....-...+ -..-.
-
I ~~ lU'JIf EJ,iYATIOt-l..
. 1!l!~~1IlI
.
.
.
u.' l'
. <
rt'':
-'.
14~'" i .'-.' ;.... ! .'.'; : ...~:,"'.. 1....
-.-
.- -'
:~
----0 6 €I €I e ~ e~e €:I
. oI!'= .'~ ...'- .fi3'-".-.
,. \. 4'.',,1. ,....' -. dV
- ". > G> 1~~-'" 4':. 'r e-..~:
~~ ~ ........ L ..... .J.
- . .-@" - ~ ~i r :: rr~~~T- --ll~ :~ ,"
o,~ ":I:M" u -- "'-:' r1:,.......~ i, COlD.. ~ ;- 4 -:iiiL'; !: -_'
- --4 ". ..-"bI"" (- ~~ 19 .~ ;.- -'I
. "'~ mr~- , ,~ .. .:~......;.. : .. D1.: " ... ,. i.;,:: ,_..v ::t
"e(::t'_'t':1 r- "ff'!::~~' Hl1 .~. rlo ::'T~_ : lh -:::..c;rs.::=:.:-
00 ..,.
--- r- ~.., 0 .' " :i' '1 : ~,-J e.::-
r! -: 11\- '. I' ...fro : .' l-" -
........ I ~...ti -.cD -.& . .:)
-7ii= e ~ ....~..L,. ;;"".:. "I q. ;: - -.,' "
~ ___ ~ L u_____ u_. }.'
.. ___' b{.i' ~ ..1 / - _m_~_ ----~:..~:. ..:
'j . .. ....., ..A ....... ~! Id' ~ ~_'
:If ".1"':'" Ia'lr.:. '":, ~ ' . .. ~.~ v +' 'a.;;' L......
I (.{!-..- "' ... '.. r Iirc-..... ~== II:., : ~M.( ,r;:;.:' :.
liii' .~..~ :L --:... , . w "'"' .o.'j ~. ..
f- F''!i. ~.. -\;--
IIID:j ~..... I' ... t. 4
; ..: 1 --.-;''---.. Ir; i4'
I..-'.JP'II&-I :dl' n . ~c..i lliilr.. 'V . 14'
r:::]. ....' __L' " . ,..' \::I., ~ IV'. ...., M'. .,.
~ I' -I; ~;;H' _ II~ialGl~~1 n;.\;'j' ~_IIi- ~I\.:=:
. ' ::n u ~ ;~lL..! I ".."-
:~Ji' ; --~ - ~:.;.:;:.-;.~~ -, !:::..=". - 11111 e e
.I.~ _ I \~,....t..:;. ., ~'It~~~__ 11'1111
"""~i'l r-, ,"'-', I), '1I.'lllt1Ul'
':t,1' J D' ., '"__1....__ _I -~...,
-i I ....
:,
~
.-
:~-
-.
...
..
e
I !
~....~.
,
I r
__ -..;.1..
..-
&FIRST F~.~ 00
--t~..w
-1'----
.....,...
= 'P'U':
.-
.-:.....
.
\
.
~
\
\.
\re>
@? @
..'
J ~1@1!H.ElEVATION~
. ~....'I
.
~_........
-..
~~
---
.
o
..
.
~c..c:.:..
, -
.
-i-'
.
<~
.
~
....1..
r.',;
.,1.,,,
.t....
""
-;
"!
"c
-'
I
1.1
'a .u 111'";. ...
". ....t;i'=' :~~.. 0 ~ ;~~~~ } ~ '
=: ou'//" '~~J ~'..' l"'h~ ~~ / .JIf
Iii\ ,...
Cr.iI \;::J =.....~..., -'I' @ ~ 1./. 6, I
~ ...... ...... "t @ ..J
I, . ~rm ~..u~! ; (@ -DOl- --n
~ '::nIU1II--(IO ~ 3 ilIJ: _',u:.>>= I
lr' i [B!)-iIo,Q, rr...zr-r .
_ LL --_ )n.
· ........ ,. 11
.-..... -i h.-una
1-; OIl -111 WIll. ....
,'." .........., III ...... .. .
'A11"'~
........ I""''''
, .0G
, ..
Do ,'v'
_....ICYIlICCC..........
./ ............."
./
'.4 ........~. ..:,
....."'. ,-.. '. Cli..... eo
,... ..,.. ...... .....
=~ .......",
.....,.....".Il.~
0IlLWJL "".... ~'..
...... ....-. ~.
ar.ao '........
-
::
.-
...... ."
,..,UIIICa"'="'& "'i
,
_l!VIL-
" @
" I
';-,,,' I .......
ee
I-I
.
I
I ....
r ..~:~-=
! "@) lir';; n..__@., .@--
I ~;J~:: ~ ..;'1,@) .'...
~ "l\~ ~.'iiD 1BJ
.....1- .~!
l7 ~ \ tooo_.....
~'.4'tt
-..,'
,a'7'
CA.....
~
&sECOND-FLOOR,~ ~
"
..
IT
~i
al
I
'9
";
---
o
,
-v
~
--...
'.
'.
-~
... !
= l
-9i
.,
I I
l' .
".
"\
~..
.
I
.
".
1...--. ._-.
-- ~
~ ~.
...-.r ~ I~ P
*--!m :l_~r i" '00
~.r ~~ ~ ~ 8 stuDiO .13. '
Wi< --nl ... __
~
.......-
.""
-
h~-~Tl
lS~~L
~
,
___I."IU~
....
.
r
l- ~ ~ 1T
~ r,
~Qi: I'll.
~ '
l !-I 0
.. I I
. ,
..
I~... ~.
~_. ~ ~I I ~,
__ _ I I 1_ ~
<, jii~ ':' m-tm --------
...., CIJiJ ~~
~ - _ 0 li ---=-
". --t:---
'"
-
:"::3.::",
~~;~~. . tIl
t..'i~.: I
r''il
Ia II ·
0\
';:';;. I'
2~!! ~ jl
o t.. j ';!;, ! .
'I"""': ,r, ' '1\.Ir !
! .~.. ~ II AI~~~
.-: i ~ --r :
. ~__ ~ c--~:
.." --@:!.- j
.'\1 "" . 'l
ii! 'V'_ j .
1111 'I l
1111 .
..
~ ~,;
::~w.=-&~
%
__ ._J ~
.......
V
1- .
.
1 S1UIllO .11. &
1 -- .)r
)D, ..
.J
1
~
.... .:......
~ -",otIu-
'I ~'-r::.
--
~
~
11 A TYPiCAl FIRST n"OOR PlAN
.... .,,"'~
l\
i
I
.
I
""
re'
.
.
.-
..--
..
. '=L
.
I
.
...
-~
~
..
~
StuDIO -23'
--
.
Z
Irta::r.
51U01O '21'
--
~
-
----
..--
A
TYPICAL SECOND FLOOR PLAN
-",
. .,....r-r