HomeMy WebLinkAbout1335
.
.
.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1335
A RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87-7 TO
CONSTRUCT A NEW AUTOMOTIVE GARAGE AT 333 NORTH FIRST AVENUE.
WHEREAS, on April 6, 1987 an application was filed by Robert A. Ruiz to
construct a new automotive garage, Planning Department Case No. C.U.P. 87-7, on
property commonly known as 333 North First Avenue, more particulary described as
follows:
See Exhibit "A"
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on April 28, 1987, at which time all
interested persons were given full opportunity to be heard and to present
evidence;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA HEREBY
RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the factual data submitted by the Planning Department in
the attached report is true and correct.
Section 2. This Commission finds:
1. That the granting of such Conditional Use Permit will not be
detrimental to the public health or welfare, or injurious to the property or
improvements in such zone or vicinity.
2. That the use applied for at the location indicated is properly one
for which a Conditional Use Permit is authorized.
3. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to
accommodate said use, and all yards, spaces, walls, fences, parking, 10adin9,
landscaping and other features required to adjust said use with the land and uses
in the neighborhood.
4. That the site abuts streets and highways adequate in width and
pavement type to carry the kind of traffic generated by the proposed use.
5. That the granting of such Conditional Use Permit will not adversely
affect the comprehensive General Plan.
6. That the use applied for will not have a substantial adverse impact
on the environment.
.
.
.
Section 3. That for the foregoing reasons this Commission grants a
Conditional Use Permit to construct a new automotive garage upon the following
conditions:
1. That conditions listed below from the Department of Public Ilorks
shall be complied with to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
A. Plant parkway trees at locations determined by the Director of
Public Works per City of Arcadia Standard S-13.
B. Construct P.C.C. sidewalk, as per City Standard.
C. Gravity drainage outlets, and driveway aprons shall be
constructed to conform to Drawi ng S-l1.
D. All survey monuments, centerline ties and survey reference
points shall be protected in place or re-established where
disturbed. This work will be the responsibility of the
permittee and shall be at the permittee's expense.
2. Fire protection shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Fire
Department which includes the following:
A. Forced ceiling ventilation system in battery repair or charging
room with ventilation system interlocked with any charging
system. Motor of ventilation system shall be for hazardous
locations.
B. Electrical equipment in charging room shall be explosion proof
and comply with electrical code for Class I Division 1
hazardous locations.
C. Electrical lamps shall be totally enclosed by suitable guards to
prevent physical damage and prevent falling of hot particles
within the charging room or within 20 feet of the room if not
separated by a partition.
D. Charging batteries to be in compliance with C.A.C. Tit'le 8
Subchapter 7 section 5185 and section 3400 (d).
E. Fire alarm system to central station.
F. Automat i c Fi re Spri nkl ers may be requi red dependi ng on the type
of occupancy classification as determined by the Building
Department. Appears that possible classifications are B-1, B-2
H-1, and H-4. Sprinklers may also be required due to these
1335
-2-
.
.
.
harza rds: Ti re Storage, Battery Storage and Repai r, Two-story
building housing repair garage and Flammable liquid storage,
handling, or use
G. Occupany separation walls may be required between different
types of occupancy.
H. Garage area may require floor drainage with a separator in drain
to sewer. Also mechanical ventilation may be required in the
repai r area.
3. Any change in water service shall be installed by the Arcadia Water
Department at the developer's expense.
4. The City Council shall approve the proposed industrial site of
7,050 square feet in lieu of 15,000 square feet (9266.2.3).
5. A modification shall be granted for a zero street side yard setback
(La Porte Street) in lieu of 10'-0" for a portion of the garage (9266.2.2.1.(d)).
6. All work for the automotive garage shall be done inside the
buil di ng.
7.
8.
sale, lease
and auto body work shall be prohibited.
parked on the premi ses whi ch are offered
Auto body painting
No vehicles may be
or rent.
for
9. The gates along La Porte Street shall remain open during business
hours to permit access into the parking lot.
10. The site shall be maintained as per the plans on file in the
Planning Department.
11. After completion of the new automotive garage, excluding t1e
covered carport, the existing building shall be demolished or removed within
thirty (30) days. The proposed parking lot and landscaping shall be completed
within thirty (30) days after the removal of the existing building.
12. That C.U.P. 87-7 shall not take effect until the owner and
applicant have executed a form available at the Planning Department indicating
awareness and acceptance of the conditions of approval.
13. Noncompliance with the provisions and conditions of this
Conditional Use Permit shall constitute grounds for the immediate suspension or
revocation of said Permit.
-3-
1335
.
.
.
Section 4. The decision, findings and conditions contained in this
Resolution reflect the Commission's action of April 28, 1987 and the following
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Commissioners Amato, Galinski, Hedlund, Kovacic, Papay, SZilny
None
Commi ssioner Fee
Section 5. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution
and shall cause a copy to be forwarded to the City Council of the City of
Arcadi a.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was adopted at a regular
meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th the day of May, 1987 by the
following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Amato, Galinski, Hedlund, Kovacic, Szany
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Papay
ABSTAIN: Commissioner Fee
. g Commission
ATTEST:
tulldJUf11rd ~
Secretary, Planning Commission
City of Arcadia
1335
-4-
,
e"
.
. .
. .
333 No. First
Arcadia, CA
Ave.
9"j06
,0
,
EXHIBIT "A"
Lot 18 in Block 80 of Arcadia Santa Anita Tract, in the City of Arcadia, as per
map recorded in Book IS pages 89 and 90 of Haps, in the office of the Recllrder
of Loa Angelea County, State of California.
EXCEPT that portion of aaid Lot 18 in Block 80 of Arcadia. Santa Anita Tract,
described as follows:
Beginning at the No~theasterly corner of said Lot 18, thence Southerly along the
Easterly line of said lot a distance of 50.00 feet to the Southeasterly corner of
aaid lot;. thence Westerly along the Southerly line of said lot to a line that is
parallel with and distant Westerly 10.00 feet, measured at right angles, f.rom said
Easterly line of Lot 18; thence Northerly along said parallel line, to thE' beginning
of a tangent curve Southwesterly having a radius of 15.00 feet, said curve also being
tangent at its Westerly terminus to the Northerly line of said Lot 18; thE.nce Northwesterly
along said curve to said Westerly terminus; thence Easterly along said Northerly line
of Lot 18 to the point of beginning; as granted to the City of Arcadia, b}' deed recorded
December 24, 1971 as Instrument No. 703, Official Records.
.
April 28, 1987
FROM:
ARCADIA CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
WILFRED E. WONG, ASSOCIATE PLANNER
TO:
CASE NO.:
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87-7
GENERAL INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
Robert A Ruiz
LOCA TION:
333 North First Avenue
REQUEST:
COnditional Use Permit to construct a new automotive
garage with the following modifications:
.
A. Zero street side yard setback (La Porte
Street) in lieu of 10'-0" for portion of garage
(9266.2.2.1.( d ll.
B. An industrial site of approximately 7,050
square feet in lieu of 15,000 square feet
(9266.2.3 ).
LOT AREA:
Approximately 7,050 square feet (.16 acre)
FRONT AGE:
so feet on First Avenue
141.69 feet on La Porte Street
EXISTING LAND USE lit ZONING:
Automotive garage and nonconforming dwelling; zoned
M-I
SURROUNDING LAND USE lit ZONING:
.
North:
South:
East:
West:
Industrial; zoned M-l
Commercial and industrial; zoned M-l
Automotive garages; zoned M-l
Industrial; zoned M-I
. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNA nON:
Industrial
HISTORY
Building permits show that originally a store building and a dwelling wetl~
built in 1958 on the subject site. Since 1978 Howard's Tire and Battery hils
been in business in the front half of the building and a dwelling was located
in the rear half. Presently, there is no landscaping, striped parking lot or
trash enclosure.
..
On January 13, 1987 the Planning Commission voted 7 to 0 to approve C.U.P.
86-17, a request to operate an automotive garage at 333 North First Avenue.
The applicant had proposed to expand the garage into the area which the
dwelling occupied, eliminating a nonconforming use. A portion of the roof
was to have been raised from 9'-0" to 14'-0" to make servicing vehicles
easier. Other remodeling would have included paving the City parkway,
planting street trees and on-site landscaping to buffer the parking lot,
relocating a telephone pole guy wire to allow for a new driveway, paving
and striping the parking lot, building a block wall with wrought iron fencing
along La Porte Street, providing for a trash enclosure and adding a new
mansard roof. Modifications were granted for an existing zero front yard
setback in lieu of 10'-0" and a partial reduction of landscaping along La Porte
Street.
PROPOSAL
The applicant proposes to construct a new two-story 2,896 square foot
automotive garage. To avoid closing during construction the new garage is
being built at the rear of the lot, which will not disturb the existing building.
The Planning Department wlll be recommending a timetable for the
demolition of the existing building and completion of the parking lot with
landscaping.
Two modifications are being requested. A portion of the garage will have a
zero street side yard setback (La Porte Street) in lieu of 10'-0". The adjacent
industrial building, which was built in 1960, at 56 La Porte Street has a
similar setback from the street. Also, the appearance of the wall facing La
Porte has been taken into consideration with the use of a variety of split face
blocks.
.
C.U.P 87-7
4/28/87
PIge 2
.
The lot contains 7,0::)0 square feet in lieu of I ::),000 square feet required for
an industrial devleopment in the M-l zone. Code Section 9266.2.3 states
that the City Council may approve an industrial development on a lot less
than 15,000 square feet where a hardship by reason of surrounding
development, location or configuration is clearly demonstrated. Surrounding
the subject site are either buildings or streets, therefore a hardship exists
due to surrounding developments.
ANALYSIS
It is the Planning Department's opinion that the development can be
accommodated on the lot as long as the business does not include auto body
painting or auto body work. These activities require vehicles to be stored on
the premises for longer periods of time, which would eliminate on-site
parking spaces for employees and patrons. To alleviate this problem, it is
staff's opinion that a separate parking lot, screened from public view, should
be required for the storage of vehicles. Staff has no objection to the
dispensing of tires, batteries, oil and accessories; tuning of motors, wheel and
brake adjustment and other minor repairs and services.
.
On April 21, 1987 the Arcadia Redevelopment Agency approved the Design
Review for the proposed garage subject to the approval of C.U.P 87-7.
An automotive garage is a permitted use in the M-l zone with an approved
conditional use permit. Approval of this conditional use permit would
remove a nonconforming residential use and allow for a substantial
upgrading of the property. Also, the proposal would be consistent with the
zoning and general plan for the area.
Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, tb,e
Planning Department has prepared an initial study for the proposed projl~ct.
Said initial study did not disclose any substantial or potentially substantial
adverse chllnie in any of the physiCal conditions within the area affected by
the project including land. air, water, minerals, flora. fauna. ambient noise
and objects of historical or aesthetic significance. Therefore, a Negative
Declaration has been prepared for this project.
.
C.U.P 87-7
4/28/87
Pltge 3
~
.
The Planning Department recommends approval of C.U.P. 87-7 subject to llhe
following conditions:
1. Conditions as outlined in the attached report from the
Department of Public Works shall be complied with to the
satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
2. Fire protection shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Fire
Department. Conditions as outlined in the attached report dated
April 9, 1987 from the Fire Department shall be complied with.
3. Any change in water service shall be installed by the Arcadia
Water Department at the developer's eI.pense.
4. The City Council shall approve the proposed industrial site of
7,0:;0 square feet in lieu of 15,000 square feet (9266.2.3).
5.
A modification shall be granted for a zero street side yard
setback (La Porte Street) in lieu of! 0' -0" for a portion of the
garage (9266.2.2.Ud)).
.
6.
All work for the automotive garage shall be done inside the
building.
7. Auto body painting and auto body work shall be prohibited.
8. No vehicles may be parked on the premises which are offered
lor sale, lease or rent.
9. The gates along La Porte Street shall remain open during
business hours to permit access into the parking lot.
10. The site shall be maintained as per the plans on file in the
Planning Department.
.
C.U.P 87-7
4128/87
Page 4
.
I 1. After completion of the new automotive garage, excluding the
covered carport, the existing building shall be demolished or
removed within thirty (30) days. The proposed parking lot lInd
landscaping shall be completed within thirty (30) days after the
removal of the existing building.
12. That C.U.P. 87-7 shall not take effect until the owner and
applicant have executed a form available at the Planning
Department indicating awareness and acceptance of the
conditions of approval
13. Noncompliance with the provisions and conditions of this
Conditional Use Permit shall constitute grounds for the
immediate suspension or revocation of said Permit.
FINDINGS AND MOTIONS
Aooroval
.
If the Planning Commission intends to take action to approve this project, the
Commission should move to approve and file the Negative Declaration and
find that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment
and direct staff to prepare the appropriate resolution incorporating the
specific findings and conditions of approval set forth in the staff report (or as
modified by the Commission).
Denial
If the Planning Commission intends to take action to deny this project, tbe
Commission should move to deny and direct staff to prepare an approprillte
resolution incorporating the Commission's decision and findings in SUppOl't of
that decision.
..
C.U.P 87-7
4/28/87
Page 5
.
.
.
April 9, 1987
PLANNING DEPARTMENT AND
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
SUBJECT: 333 N. FIRST AVENUE (CUP 87-7)
TO:
FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
In response to your memorandum, the item(s) which this department has concern
or special knowledge of are listed below:
1. The existing parkway widths are ten (10) feet on First Avenue and twelve
(12) feet on La Porte Street.
2. This department has no objection to the proposed front yard setback
encroachment.
This department has reviewed the subject CUP and recoRlllends the following
conditions of approval:
1. Plant parkway trees at locations determined by the Director of Public
Works per City of Arcadia Standard S-13.
2. Construct P.C.C. sidewalk, as per City Standard.
3. Gravity drainage outlets, and driveway aprons shall be constructed to
conform to Drawing S-ll.
NOTE: All survey monuments, centerline ties and survey reference points shall
be protected in place or re-established where disturbed. This work
will be the responsibility of the permittee and shall be at the
permittee's expense.
The above items are to be complied with to the satisfaction of the Dirlector of
Public WorkS in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Arcadia
Municipal Code.
dJ,n7~/
CHESTER H:HOWARO ~
Director of Public Works
CNH:DRS:rk
memO'lanJum
Date~ 1987
TO:Joyce Friedmann, Economic Developemnt Assistant
FROM: Earl S. Curtis, Fire Prevention Specialist
SUBJECT: 333 N. First
In review of the site plan for a new building at
333 N. First Avenue I have the following comments regarding
possible Fire Department Requirements.
A. If battery work is contemplated.
Require forced ceiling ventilation system in battery repair
or charging room with ventilation system interlocked with any
charging system. Motor of ventilation system shall be for
hazardous locations.
.
Electrical equipment in hcarging room shall be explosion
proof and comply with electrical code for Class I div. 1
hazardous locations.
Electrical Lamps shall be totally enclosed by suitable guards to
prevent physical damage and prevent falling of hot particles
within the charging room or within 20 feet of the room if not
separated by a partition.
Charging batteries to be in compliance with C.A.C. Title 8 Sub
chapter 7 section 5185 and section 3400 (d).
B. Fire alarm system to central station required.
C. Automatic Fire Sprinklers may be required depending on the
type of occupancy classification as determined by the Building
Department. Appears that possible classifications are B-1, B-2
H-l, and H-4. Sprinklers may also be required due to these hazards:
Tire Storage
Battery Storage and Repair
Two story building housing repari garage
Flammable liquid storage, handling, or use
D. Occupancy separation walls may be required between different
types of occupancy.
E. Garage area may require floor drainage with a separator in
drain to sewer. Also mechanical ventilation may be required
in the repair area.
o
cc: Wilfred Wong
.~ ~
. . :"i,A11to Sent
I, IS5 50
....
!:>o .50 0.01
"oil
8 .~
e IxeA
I tlci~nA \ l!
m.l (~ 1"B' tJf>e<;, 1... . {
!!IO , .7T <t.
LA PORTE
50 50 50 0 H!lI.!'!7'~'\"~
(~ Cof" ~.1 (~ ! Aafo Sa.M
C"" MIX ~ry~~ :.,1
d 'Ill
_ Iii _'i._ ...
C' INd n.o.~ :R ~ ~ .~~
~ ~ Us
JL a.. ~~~
I L., o \0...
Of ~ ~
~ :ll F ~-'"
"'I~'"
!!IO 50 ~O 141.C,'l "... l-
. 2
50 !!lO t~ I/'J "
(l ..~~ ~
~S M III ," .; . Office.
'" Q .... -
4- ... ,,~
rl-~
r - lX'- I.
m) ....
ern (of7) C"'J ".
(JJ), (4') (n . R-I NT. N9 \... 10'
(:"; (4$) f{$) 6.....0[",
!!lO 50
ST JOSEPH
10' 10
(~
cuP 37-7
,...
AND USE' AND ZONING
.
I":: lOa'
.
4;
.
-.--5.............. -
..h ".!'.:".I..
"L. .::II :.I!ii.:.-r=v-__.; _"~:'i.~::a~.r::u...~ji:i:C~
rlll:lp C.U1UIt'f"t 'MIDt" ,n "'"'T~
......... u.a.'_._.I_D"U'_ '.'.:: :.:.:~: ~..:-._ .
.'''Ii M:'~-:;"":"':':'=:'-'_a....;.._.:......-:..~.:.;........::..:.:__:....
-...--
.11... ..aallll
. . . ...
.'.1' .
.1" U.:PLIU
; ..... "'0 ..... ....
.
... '",\'
.u..... ,~.:t:l.......,. .
t. u,,::t,-.. '. IIUI .
. ....,.,...t
'1"'" '''''11111'''''&
\:111. ,,,., 1,0'. "".
.apG!'4"'. ....U..U.. .
,
co.
..
"
I
II
;~
IO."c.'
.. &...
a.', ... ...
.~
to ~.. cA....
) I',
I, I
,'" ... n' !
. I
., ..I~"" '
,
I"
&~ '
!1
,II h
'1'~
;~:~ l~ Ii
i,!, l (~/f'l
AI, ot:
:'1 l
~F
!\I; :.
Ii'
I~{
t..,.~-..
"...... ,..,..
, -.
'............:, ....
-
t<,;...,.jl
......
,.....1\
"
~
',:
,
~
,04 .
.! t'" ,I" i
II'
i:::.:''',,1I1.::::)D
4..U1-~~L 1 ,.1'
,--r r-", j-;
..jflJ ~t::.~
I
...C "''.:J:'' "I'"
.... ...~
,"
.':," . I '.J~:~"
...11
".......... "J
I". "'\
1~1II!. ~.
1
, ." II. 'I'" T .. V ..
o l ~ T ! E: L 1'\ l' 0.. ? L . ~
'C' '.
.
.
File No. C.U.P. 87-7
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA
A. Description of project: A corditional use permit for construction of
a new automobile garage,
B. Location of project:
333 N. First Ave., Arcadia, CA 91006
C.
Name of applicant or sponsor:
Robert A. Ruiz
D. Finding: This project will have no significant effect upon the
environment within the meaning of the California Environme,ntal
Quality Act of 1970 for the reasons set forth in the attached
Initial Study,
E. Mitigation measures, if any, included in the project to avoid
potentially significant effects:
4/6/87
. Date:
SJ.gna re
Date Posted:
Associate Planner
TJ.t e
.
.
.
A. BACKGROUND
1.
Name of Proponent
2.
File No.
C.U.P. 87-]
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
Robert A. Ruiz
116 \t1ite Oak Drive
Address and Phone Number of Proponent
91006
Arcadia. CA
B. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets.)
L ~. 1oI1l1tn"propo.d r...ult in,
.. Un.t,blot ...,.tll condition. or in
cl\an9". 1n '111I01<>911:: .uh.tructuc",,?
b. Dhruptions. dllpla"emont., cO#>-
paetion or ovo,.eov.,rin':l of tho soil?
1;. a",nq.. in tnpoqraphy or qround
.uthee roHer fa"'tl.lua?
d. Tllo dc.tneUon, covertnll or
lIlodJH".tlQh of lUll' unique o;JC(llOl;lle
Of plly.1".1 f""tuns?
.. MY inerflll'l! In wind or ,,/It....
c:nl&10n of 8011., ..1lh".. on or oft
tlll!.!t..?
f. Ch.n9u in dltation. dopedt!on
01' llrodon which IUI' lllodUy trio
cnann..l of . rll10r or ."ream.
g. t.xpOlIureof pe:opl<>orpropony to
....0100;;10: hUllrd. BUen .. .aJ"t.hqll..k....
Illlnda11d",.mu.nlidrs.9rouflllfllilura,
or IiUllilorhaurdl?
2. lli. Will thf! propOs.l ~o.ult in,
.. Substsothl aU. e1l11i..iooa o~
det.llrJ,oratlc.noflllllblllntdrqulll1ry1
b. 1'h.. I;natioo of objoctlooablll
odors1
c. IIltorsUon of air ....v"""..nt.
IIIOlstu:r. or telllP..rstllll'e, o~ eny
chlLngeincl1l11ate. eHllarlocally
o~ u'llonslly7
J. ~. Will tho proposal result in'
.. ChlUlgelL in <!'lIll'rents or the o::o=s..
of direction of "Gte~ IIIOv"llumts in
tresll"llt.n1
b. Chsnq.s in absorption UUS.
drGina']e petterns, or th. ret" an(l
U\Dunt Of surtsce ..st..r rW\off1
C, Alt"~lItl0n. to the co\lr.. or
flow of tlood "stanl
(I. Cllsnqe in tho lIllLountot surlac.
..stell' in any WlItO~ body?
e, Oischarqe into .urtsc.. ..aten, or
in .ny ",Herst ion of surfeee "ate~
QuaUty, indudinq bllt not lJ.la1ted to
t_ratur., d1esolv<tCl O:<Yge" Or
t.\I~bidlty1
f, Alter.tion of till> direction or
rate ot now Qf 9roW\cl wlIten7
9. Ch4llqelnthequlIntityot9rO\Ulcl
"Gtan. .ither thl'ol.l9h direct additions
Ill" ....ithclr"w.h. or through inter~ption
or eny .quiter hy cut. or excllv.tlon.'
y!S~..!!2..
~~1!2...
h. Suh.tantilll reduetlon in th"
amount of "..tel' oth"rYi.e a"ailahle
fo~ p\1bl1<:: wlIt..r auppU...?
.:C'
,/
..L"
i. Exposure of people or property
to .....t..r relatod ns.arda .uo;:h a.
Uoocl.ing7
4. Plant LUe. Will the propo".l re.u1t in:
ll. Change In th.. diY.nhy of .pecha.
or nWllber of Iny species or phnt.e
/including treell. .Ilrubll. grus. crop.,
IIIleranon and equuicpl411tlll1
~
~
..L
L
~
b. Roduction ct the- numborD of any
unique. r..~.. or ondll.llo;ered .peeie.
ofphntll?
~
L
e. Introduction of nil.... sped.s Ilf
plant. into "" IIrea, or r".ulr in a
b"'rri..~ to rn" not1MI ~..pl..ni.hn.ftl'It
of ...daring IIp..ci....?
'""'"
L
5. Anillllll Lite. will the propoul re..ult
In,
0/
e. Chang" in the cliveraity of spllcin.
or nu.,-.b.,Il'. of any .paci... of llni"'ala
Ibirdll.lancl"nll11elainclvdinqrept1lell.
U.h and ehellUan. benthic Or'illnUlU.
in.acts or 111lcrofllunal7
~
b. Reduet:lon ot t.Ile nUlllbeu of any
unlqil", rare Or "nclallqered .-peeie.
Ilt.n1Jllals?
..0.:-
L
c. Introduction of new .pecl.. Ilf
lIlllm.l. into en .re.. o~ r.,lIlt 1n
. harrler to the IIl1gration or lIlOveM
"",nt of ani..al.7
-=-
4. OetCldontion to "1li.etin9 wildlife
hahitet?
..",-
...-
6. 1I'0he. Will th. propos.l ra.ult in,
a. In<::re""1I in ..i.ting nlJi.. leweb?
~
b. Expo.vre ot people to eevere
nolae lev.b?
---
--
7, ~~~~c:n~"el~~:ht :;l~l:~lrOplnal
B. Lllnd U.e. Will the propo.el re.uH ~n
a eWlatantiel alteration of the
pres.nt or plannG la"d ..." of 11.II ar.a~
-=-
~
,. Nlltu.nl Rellourcea. lfiU rhe pro~al
".ult 1n;
---
a. Incr.llllfl ~n the rate of uao!! lit .ny
nstural "loureee1
...."....
---
b. Substa.ntisl dapl.t~on of any
nonren.....4hl. n.tursl r..ourc..'
~
/'
-1-
..
..
.
10. Rhk of UPUl. Dele.. t/',.. prllpOul
lnvoJ\l1t .. rUk of .In eqI1oaion or
the rata..oof hat.rdg". .\I~t.nc...
(lncl"dJn9. but not U~ited to, oU,
pestlc:ldu. eh..1I1c:.1I or .udhrlonl
11'1 l:bl! aVl!nt of an lI.c:eident or
up.et-condition.?
~ ~ .!!Q.
L
L
~
/
L
-L
.L
L
.:C
11. ~h:u~:~~~~~n, W~~~t~~:\In~~":;n:f~;~
or; qr~h rato of tll" hWll4n popuh-
lion of an ana?
u.
:~~~~~~ ~~in:~e o~r:=~; :ftac:r
dCI/Und for .dtlltlonlll houatn'3?
u,
TnnaPOrtatlon/Cl.-(:u!at;.gn. Will
tI'Ic: prQpos,U raluU. l.nl
iI. Genllratlon of sub.lantial ad(l!-
t.1Oft&t "..M.c<.\tu _".....nt1'
b. tUol;:uonallUtlnqpllrking
lile-tUlle.. at dllr.land for n~ parting?
c. Sllbn.anthl !.IlIpac:t. uPQn ."theing'
tran.pentation .yatell.?
4. Alteruiona to pre.ant ~u.t.fu:n'
0' cin:llhUon or llroVment IJf pllople
and/or ..GOd.?
u,
.. Alt.oradQne to ...terborllO. rail
or &it udUd
f. Incraue in u'attic: hU,u.cb to
nctor vehie1el, blcycllU.1 pr
pedeltrllnl?
Public 5I>rv1"'... Will the prop....)
neveonerrec:tllpon,orrell",ltlne
neoN! for new or "ltor..d qov,u.l\llIontal
..rv1c... 1.n any of t.he follpW1n9
aro..,
rire protection?
.L'
./
L
b. Pol1r:e prOt8'c:t.lon7
c. Schoch?
d. PArka or other reCreAU"nal
faeUltiell1
.L'
L
L:'
e. M.a.intonane" of publlc f...dH~
ti.., inellldin<,) ro.til?
f. Othor 90Verl\lllentlll lerv.tcu?
15. ~, WUl dll~ proposal ~ellult In;
/I, Uae or IUbltAntial Uloullt.. of
fUlIl or l!nl!r<;lY?
b. Sub.t..nUa1 inere..... in demand
upon el<b~in9 'l)Utelta Q! onoJr<n'. or
reqUIre t"'" d""'eIQJllllent of lllJW
loure.llofenar..:f?
.16. Uhliti.... 1011.11 thopropo.....l r...ult
~Cornew.y.tC!IltlI.<>r
.1lbot.anUd altentlons toth.. foIl(>\;-
In9utll1tI...,
L
./'
., Power or n.atural 'ol1a"?
b, Communle.ationl .Ylteru?
<. Wlter1
., Severor.aptic tMIr.I?
., StOt1lllotAt'u dr...1naqe1
., Solid .......u ~. dhpo....'?
.L'
.L'
.L'
~
./'
.L
11. lh,j.."...n Health. "111 the pr1)l'OslI.l
r...UJ.tln:
.... CresHono! ..nyhe>o.ltht>ourd or
potential health hnard (,,>c~ludin'ol
mentllheA1thP'
b. txpo.ur. gf peoplo to pcltanthl
health hazard.?
---
0/
Date
4/6/87
-2-
U. lIeet.het1es. N111 the propQlld rCl1lult
:In t.no o'ut..ruc:tionof Anyscllnlc
vi.to 0:1: view open to the publiC. or
..111 th. Pl"OPOllla1 r..ult in the
c:rellt1onofllnllll.thetlesllyolfensiVll
tlte o~n tg public view1
m~.EQ..
.L'
19. ~eenation. NUl the propollal reeult
1n on I.lllpol.etuprm t.heql1llUty or
quant.it.Y,of ..>ctstin'ol rllc:rellUonll1
OPportun1UIII1I1
IIro::l\lIolO iel1 HIU.orica1. Will the
propcltl4 u.u t non. tent.ion of
e .1'olniticant areheoloq.lc:al or
hhtorical ..ite, lIu.uc:ture, objllct
or bul1dln'ol1
~
:0,
L'
u,
~nd=~ ~~n:~~l:c~f n:t:n~~;C;:~:~thl
to de-'olrade tho quality of the environarnt.
.11h.t.ant.1aU~ reduee. t.ho.. habit.at of e
f....h orwUdlife ,pectes, c:aU!le II t10h
or wlldl1t.. pOpuletion to drop bel(llol
.'''If-.u.talnln'llevelll, thraate>t1to
eUllllnfltl! a plant or ontm.ol co_,,"ity.
r.dvCle the nu=hllr or ra.t.dct we un\la
of a rare or lIndlln'1erad phnt or -.nulIOl
oz el1ll11nau hnportant ex.ampl... of the
_jor por1o.u oi Cllllforn1a hilltory
or prehlst.ory'?
.L'
b. 1)Qe. the prQject heve t.ho poUntil1
to achieve .hort-tertll, t.o the dhadvantlqo
of lonq-terlll anvirol\Jllli!ntal 'ol0llU? III
.hort-te1'lll impact. on the envlrol'llllent
10 one lothiehoc:euu in.. relatively
briet, definitive pedolS of tillll!' whUa
long-tartl\ iIllpIlCU..Ul endure .."Uinta
the future. I
.L'
c. Dou the project have imp.en
whiCh are individudly UlIlltcd. hut
eUllllllatively conlOiderlll:l1a7 fA project
mar impact on twO or n>nt ...par.te
re.Our~a wllore the J.mpact an e"ah
re.ource il relatively a_II, b\lt wher.
the .Heet of the total of tho.. implctll
On t.heenvtronr.rent. lalllqnltica..t.l
d. Do.at1lflprOJecths"oenvlrc>nlM!nt.al
eH~ct. Which ...ill Clul.... ..-..bltu-nlhl
adver.. .fCec,,- on hu...n Oein9.' eIther
directly or indirectly?
~
.L"
C. OJSCl1SstON OF ENVlRONIIWTAL EVIo1oUATIW
D. Dt:'TEIIHIIlATIOO
(to be eompleted by the Lead Aq_neyl
On the bellis of tlIis inltlll evalllat.1.on'
.Jj!!'J find tha propo.ed. project COULD !lOT have a a1qnifieant
effect on the enviro~nt. end a tlEGATJVI: PEClJoltATION
",ill be prepared.
o I find tlIat dthou'olh the proposed project could have It
alqniUcant, effect on the environumt. there ..iU not
be a d'olnitJcsntetfe.ct lnthia CUe becallllll thelllltiq"tion
_...ur... deacriblld on sn at.tached aheet hav. been addod to
tli. project. A NEGATIVI DtCLAJlATION ifILL BE PRePARED.
01 Hnd the propo.ed project MAY have a .1gniUc.nt .ff.et
on thc! .nvironment, ..nd an ENVIRoe;KEN'J'A.L IMPACT REPORT h
requlrtld.
i
e)
.
.
..
FHe No. C.U.P. 87-7
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM
A, Applicant's NlIlIlS' Robert A. Ruiz
Address. 116 White Oak Drive
Arcadia, CA
91006
B. Property Address (IDeation): 333 No. First Ave.
Arcadia, CA
91006
C, General Plan Desi9I\ation:
Industrial
D, ZOne Classification:
M-l
E. Proposed Use (State exactly wbat use is intended for the property, i.e., type"
activities. employment):
To build a new building to better house the existing business
of automotive batteries, tires and light service relating to the
tires and batteries.
F, Square Footaqe of Site: 7053' 3"
G, Square Footaqe of Existinq Build1nqs:
1. To Remain: -0-
2. To Be Removed: 2344'4"
R, Square Footaqe of New BuHd1nqs:
2800'
t, Square Footaqe of Build1nqs to be Used for:
1. c-rcial Activities: 2800'
2. Industrial Activities: -0-
3, Residential Activities: -0-
Number of Units. 1
On a separate sheet, describe the followinq.
1. Tbe environmental settinq of the project site as it exists,
2. The proposed alterations to the project site.
3. The use and development of the surroundinq properties.
-1-
.. I!:nvironmental Information Form
.
JIt
K. Olecl< the appropriate answers to the following questions:
Yes ~
1. Will the prcposed project result in a substantial alteration
of groWld contours and/or alteration of existing drainage
pattern?
2. Will the proposed project result in a change in groWldwater
quality and/or quantity?
3. Will the proposed project result in an increase in noise,
vibration, dust, dirt, smoke, fumes, odor or solid waste?
4. Will the proposed project result in the use or disposal of
potentially hazardous materials?
S. Will the proposed project result in a substantial increase
in demand for mWlicipal services and/or energy consumption,
Explain in detail any "YES" answers to the above questions on additional sheets.
L. Provide any additional information which would elaborate on the potential
environmental consequences resultant from the proposed project,
xx
xx
xx
xx
xx
M. Certification: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the
attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial
evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements and informati~
presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Date,
March 23. 1987
-2-
--
.
File No. C.U.P. 87-7
ENVIROIDJENTAL INFOmlATION FOffiJ
(con't)
J, 1. The building that exists now was built between 1955 and 1960
and is in dire need of remodeling, not only for appearances,
but also to improve the efficiency of the tire and battery
business and to bring the property up to code for safety.
2, I propose to build the new 2800 square foot building at the
Western boundary of the property with three bays facing First Ave.
and one bay facing LaPorte, On the Eastern boundary there will
be ample room for marked parking stalls for our personal use
and for the autos that we are servicing. The proposed plans
include landscaping and building material that is pleasing to
the eye and will enhance the area.
], Surrounding the property in question are a number of automotive
service and repair businesses, an autobody repair business, and
other industrial type businesses.
.
~