Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1625 v RESOLUTION NO, 1625 L_ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 00-018 TO OPERATE A 2,800 SQ.FT. INTERNET CAFE AT 1311 S. BALDWIN AVENUE. WHEREAS, on October 23, 2000, a Conditional Use Permit application was filed by Paul Hsiao to operate a 2,800 sq.ft. internet cafe, Development Services Department Case No. c.u.P. 00-018, at property commonly known as 1311 S, Baldwin Avenue; and WHEREAS, A public hearing was held on November 28, 2000, at which time all interested persons were given full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence, '. . ' " NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1, That the factual data submitted by the Development Services Department in the attached report is true and correct. SECTION 2, This Commission finds for the reasons set forth in the above report: .e 1. That the granting of such Conditional Use Permit will not be detrimental to the public health or welfare, or injurious to the property or improvements in such zone or vicinity, 2. That the use applied for at the location indicated is a proper use for which a Conditional Use Permit is authorized, 3, That the site, or sites, for the proposed use are adequate in size and shape to accommodate said use, and all yards, spaces, walls, fences, parking, loading, landscaping and other features required to adjust said use with the land and uses in the neighborhood. 4. That the granting of such Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the comprehensive General Plan. ,~ ------=:; -.- - ... -' 5, That the use applied for will not have a substantial adverse impact on the environment, and that based upon the record as a whole there is no evidence that the proposed project will have any potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. SECTION 3. That for the foregoing reasons this Commission grants a Conditional Use Permit No. CUP 00-018 to operate a 2,800 sq.ft, internet cafe, upon the following conditions: I, Building Code compliance and conditions of approval must be met to the complete satisfaction of the Building Section, 2, Fire safety shall be provided to the complete satisfaction of the Fire Department. 3., Seating shall be limited to a maximum of fifty-eight seats (58) for the cafe use and twenty-nine (29) seats for the internet use. 4. Noncompliance with the provisions and conditions of this conditional use permit shall constitute grounds for its immediate ,suspension or revocation, ~ SECTION 4, The decision and findings contained in this Resolution reflect the Planning Commission's action of November 28,2000, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Bruckner, Huang, Kalemkiarian, Olson, Murphy None None SECTION 5, The Secretary shall certifY to.the adoption of this Resolution and shall cause a copy to be forwarded to the City Council of the City of Arcadia, I HEREBY CERTIFY that the forgoing Resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on December 12, 2000, by the _ following vote: ~ . ~ AYES: Bruckner, Huang, Olson, Murphy NOES: None ABSENT: Kalemkiarian ABSTAIN: None ATTEST: ~~~:=, ecretary, P annm ommlSSlon City of Arcadia APPROVED AS TO FORM: I ~r.l~ Stephen P. Deitsch, City Attorney City of Arcadia Chairman, Planning Co sion City of Arcadia STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT November 28, 2000 TO: Arcadia City Planning Commission FROM: Donna Butler, Community Development Administrator By: Kenneth Phung, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit No, 00-018 SUMMARY This Conditional Use Permit (C.U,P,) application was submitted by Paul Hsiao to operate a 2,800 sq.ft. internet cafe for patrons to dine and access the internet, from 12:00 p.m, to 12:00 a.m. at 1311 S. Baldwin Avenue, The Development Services Department is recommending denial of this application due to inadequate on-site parking. . GENERAL INFORMATION APPLICANT: Paul Hsiao (Tenant) LOCATION: 1311 S. Baldwin Avenue REQUEST: A Conditional Use Permitto operate an internet cafe, SITE AREA: 391,720 sq.ft. (8.99 acres) FRONTAGES: 660 Feet on Baldwin Avenue 680 Feet on Duarte Road 535 Feet on Naomi Avenue EXISTING LAND USE & ZONING: The site is developed with the Burlington Coat Factory, a two level parking structure and various retail shops; zoned C-2 and C-2 & H-4 (along Baldwin Avenue), . e . . SURROUNDING LAND USES & ZONING: North: General commercial uses; zoned C-2 and C-2 & D South: Retail shopping center (Sllv-On) and mixed residential uses; zoned C- 2 and R-3 respectively East: General commercial uses; zoned C-2 & H, West: Vons Pavilion and retail shops; zoned C-2, GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: The site is designated as Commercial. PROPOSAL Restaurants are permitted uses in the C-2 zone with an approved conditional use permit. The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to operate a proposed 2,800 sq,ft. intemet cafe that would occupy a vacant space within the commercial shopping center at 1311 S, Baldwin Avenue, The Intemet cafe would reserve half of the space for a restaurant use and half of the space for a internet use. The intemetcafe would provide 58 seats for the cafe and 29 seats for the internet use, from 12:00 p.m, to 12:00 a.m" 7 days a week. PARKING The on-site parking consists of 771 spaces (418 spaces are Within the site's two-story parking structure), The on-site parking does not comply with the current Code requirements, as summarized in the following table: Proposed Mix of Uses and Current Parking Requirements Approx, Current Total Size . Parking Parking Parking Tvoe of Use in so. ft. Reauirement Allocated' Deficiencv Notes #1 - Retail 201,392 1,007 753 254 #2 - Restaurant 2,000 20 7 13 CUP95.001 #9 - Proposed Internet Cafe 2,800 28 11 17 Totals 206,192 1,055 771 284 (net parking deficiency) 'Based on each use's share ,of the 771 on-site parking spaces available (Le" 2.15 spaces per 1 ,000 sq, ft,) The current on-site parking ratio for the shopping ~enter is 2,15 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of commercial space (206,192 sq,ft.) which results in an allocation of 11 spaces for the applicant's 2.800 sq, ft. internet cafe, Such a ratio is inconsistent with the code CUP 00-018 November 28, 2000 Page 2 e . . The current on-site parking ratio for the shopping center is 2,15 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of commercial space (206,192 sq,ft.) which results in an allocation of 11 spaces for the applicant's 2,800 'sq. ft, internet cafe. Such a ratio is inconsistent with the code standard of providing 10 spaces per 1,000 sq,ft, for the proposed use (I.e., 28 spaces), Based on current parking requirements for the entire Shopping center, including the proposed restaurant, there should be.1 ,055 on-site parking spaces. ANALYSIS The applicant indicated to staff that the site currently has ample on-site parking spaces per his recent parking survey of the site. Although, the survey indicates ample on-site parking (see attached parking survey), the survey in staff's opinion does not reflect the current use of such parking. The parking area that is adjacent to the location of the cafe, where patrons of the proposed cafe would likely park (See Exhibit 1: Area #A), has virtually no parking available, Staff believes that the proposed cafe, if approved, would further impact this area where there is already limited parking. Also, staff is concerned with the potential Increase in traffic, which may result from new retail uses, which may locate on this site, Uses such as eating establishments and restaurants require conditional use permits and traffic concerns can be addressed as part of the consideration of such applications. Other uses such as convenience stores do not require conditional use permits and would be permitted even though they generally are associated with increased vehicular traffic. At this time staff does not wish to see any further increase in the site's existing parking deficienCY and therefore is opposed to the requested conditional use permit. CEQA Pursuant to the prOVIsions of the California Environmental Quality Act. the Development Services Department has prepared an initial study for the proposed project. Said inilial study did not disclose any substantial or potentially substantial adverse change in any of the physical conditions within the area affected by the project including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, ambient'noise and objects of historiCal or aesthetic significance, When conSidering the record as a whole, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have any potential for adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends, Therefore,a Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project. RECOMMENDATION The Development Services Department recommends denial of Conditional Use Permit No. CUP 00.018. CUP 00-018 November 28, 2000 Page 3 e . . If the Planning Commission wishes to approve Conditional Use Permit 00-018, the Development Services Department recommends the following conditions of approval: 1, The restaurant shall be maintained and operated in a manner that is consistent with the application and plans submitted and approved for CUP 00-018. 2. Seating shall be limited to a maximum of fifty-eight people for the restaurant use and twenty-eight people ~or the Internet use (excluding the waiting areas), 3, A modification is granted for 771 on-site parking spaces in lieu of 1,055 spaces required. This approval shall not constitute an approval fora general reduction in parking for the total site. That this parking modification shall only be for the use approved by CUP 00-018 (Intemet caUl), 4, All City code requirements regarding accessibility, fire protection, occupancy, and safety shall be complied with to the satisfaction of Building Services and the Fire Department which shall include, but not limited to the following items: 5. If only one of the proposed restrooms is to be disabled/handicapped accessible, then both of the restrooms must be Unisex. 6, Installation of a Knox-box with keys in conformance with the Uniform Fire Code. 7. Installation of an NFPA-72 fire alarm system in conformance with the Arcadia Municipal Code. 8, Approval of CUP 00-018 shall not take effect until the property owner and applicant have executed and filed the Acceptance Form available from the Development Services Department to indicate acceptance of the conditions of approval. 9. All conditions of approval shall be complied with prior to completion of the tenant improvements, and the opening of the restaurant. Noncompliance with the plans, provisions and conditions of CUP 00-018 shall be grounds for immediate suspension or revocation of any approvals that could result in the closing of the restaurant. FINDINGS AND MOTIONS Denial The Planning Commission should move to deny this application and adopt Resolution No. 1625: A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Arcadia, California, denying Conditional Use Permit No. 00-025 for a 2,800 sq, ft. restaurant at 1311 S, Baldwin Avenue. CUP 00-018 November 28, 2000 Page 4 e e e Approval If the Planning Commission intends to approve this Conditional Use Permit application, the Commission should move to adopt the Negative Declaration, state the supporting findings, and direct staff' to prepare a resolution which incorporates the Commission's decision and specific findings, If any Planning Commissioner, or other interested party has any questions or comments regarding this matter prior to the November 28th public hearing, please contact Assistant Planner, Kenneth Phung at (626) 574-5447, Approved by: (/Pkn ~),12t(i~1 Corkran Nicholson Planning Services Manager Attachments: Land Use and Zoning Map Plans Parking Survey Exhibit 1 Negative Declaration & Initial Study Resolution 1625 (denial) CUP 00-018 November 28, 2000 Page 5 e . e ~~\@\~ rt);Lt 1 } o ....7h I ,,U'; -'-. uil'" ! L.- u, <WI ' "" 0:1" Jl" I- , ,.... {On <.0" ~ O~~ g, -:ai'" ::iE~lHOP 0.: 1"',. I".IF -'---_:!.~-- -~ ': Baldwin Plaza ~ s ~ ~JI ,.t' , ____~:u___~. 11' ~..._i't m.I' ~l ~t .to ~1<< ~ _.,lll"I""r\t____......l! ~ ..::101.: fI,IS"-I"'-.11 ~! ell! 1 I' ~ ~~..:;:! Gas S\allon~~ ;; ~. ~::J I r ~. ~ ~_~Il~'" r(~ (n 1'~II~ I ~J 1>' '0311;1 I [la' 1 C[)\@\~\ @ I'll I I I I -:. I J .1 , I Commercial Center '[ J l'U ~; I, .~ ,--...ii- 1 'iVacant! ~ i ~:Gas stiition I . I r ~~ . ~l I IPJIIT.cN 1~'l'bI'.e"~~ 110_ ~~ ' .' 'r RAe T 32279 ~,6. '4'...."f..' ~":':~n'rf.\\ I"'.,~ , l' ...; ? ,,~~,-! -; IlG .'IS t')!'f _ 1!l.!Oi;-;.)3"1 M.'/J J:J-Z! Q.> l'Zo!! ~,....O"'--I 'II ;: ear'\(. It,o till. '"..... ",J#t. ~ Retlrement .. ,Ql;-'S ':;:-'!.~U~.. .""1 ~~ '- ;.. D _ :r,~""", Ho- ~_ _ ,,~,pr9Sident'Pla,za ;;:0 '2. \..1~i ~ l' ~""'" 0 "I' I Inn -t t.-N' .-).~l ,:Jfi t '-:"'p1 f4g.t.'J ,~ ' Duarte Road . '0 , .....,1 ~ II'Ll I ~ ;~ . =" Office: (:mal '- I~I ~'t'l ~., . " . ;; , "'~:' '::"~r: ~ sBanK ~..... :'':; '] Q ~ I ~ :::~ I ,,~, :Jo.:u..> ~M(x .""'1'"_ .: ":l Commercial ~ I'. ,_C~nt~) -'7 -r -' ~..r:'" "1 :-~ .~- ~=:l: , - -'" 7 ("''''Q''~ " ~ Q. - '. "'" .. "', " >d :0 ~ !:Cl'l ~1P~ 0 \.01 I ~ ~ ~ .... 0 .. 4,." -l I " '" Mix .~ -. t'-.. 1;J, :;Commerclal': '"" "':. -~-;:---. ..'1 J:; A l ;-5 . Center "R" t.... ... ".. I.'..~ J . ~r 1\ l I. "" I U C~ 1 u' ,i ~.. '" ~~ l!~---' - .1 J f'("G"ltl (IiIU) _:.. .u.z" _ ~ '"0 ,., ~ ~, . o . I" 1'""':'1 v"'ons Pavilion q- <:;l .... .... ~' ;: NAOMI 3."".,1 .. '. '. . ~ >,01o?i\ ~ 1~'c6 I \;'e'o;'@ ($J(Hz. s ~~. I \~ ~. . ... . . - < 1-' ~'i"" ~ - ,. - <.:>- 'i '" ' < ;4.<1" I: 1, .... . -Ii Ja:l'- ~\ ' . . '""" ~ $ J '"" 1-<1" "\ ..~ u . - Ill., - . .. " , ~, . '., ("'~ r""oUJ (- ill,'..! '" II N :1 !JS,' - . - - ~ 0 ilia. Co~merclal Bank , N, J _ ~ I., ,f ("l a'I~r~""" ..t~ :l ,...,.~!~'.; ::l a:: .,.<>i~ .. ... 101 N ~~ ;;;! ~ GOOdyear l1res ' ,'~DlE j"" ' 'P.i:" ~~ (!--'--iinr--w ~..l~t.7 . O~odOX Church ~ oJ '{, ~... (~ l 1:",1.... ,.. ...., . ..." , . ;;'1 ~.::j Sav-on Shopping center p.1M. 14H P.-M.~, -.,3" ,.. ~~ ., ~~ t ... =.-....,,:'"' LAND USE & ZONING MAP 1311 S. Baldwin Avenue #A t NORTH CUP 00-018 1 inch = 200 feet ~ Iii s " .. N " il . . . ~ I, il .. A~l orDIZSE UST. t aI'Oa noSt IAHx J J~"'I' C:WC " )iMrn SOJ':'1Y .5 n,.""iDUC CJl.OOl !) . oat om I 7 HAtaau..nl3S I 8C.\.~IJ'IUS : " en, P'''''''', . C'iR_\ 10 Ol':"".tSEtJU' 11 CltI.X(QS 12 AYAlU.ILE ~ B-1 i"i&.-PltDto ,= 2 STAUDC'I.S 1_ .) rRAHE-!t-t.n"S :::: 4 ;DUl.D. S CtC,ul.OlLU'!B. it Sl:!Ot IUAtR J Sc'WA'I 5 ~..llL SERVIa 1 aUL !Sun: ll) 2Uun SM..OH't U uqU 12 J.Xt SQlooL P 5TIUL'! 5'.r~t5 I III " p; " BUILDING A -' ~I -+ =I: =:--1 , I " t2 II 10 9 1\\ 8 '>\U 7 H Q 6 ::J' 5 --' 't;cr. 4 -!~t.Il 3 ~;'~Q 2 =hr.~Q I . . . I . . t < ! Ii " 'ill Illi! III 111111 q '. ~ l~ I~ li= 1= lJl i ill 11111 11111 11111 1 iN 'f J b"i~O q' ~.....'ltU.tQooo U 1111 JJ II lin 1111 r.; I1II nt i III J I J .., = = = !:: = - - .- ~ .- - - - '1 - = = = =' = > . --' ~ - - ..... - - ~ - .'- -" - , - - - e - - - - ~ - ~ ~ - - - = = = pr: IllllH II !I (fll!l' Ifill! f" IlIlIrq \. DUA!lTE ROAD : I =1 r-i I s , ,....JU.WO snUC~E ....-= - = = =. '- , - - - - = = = = I - - - - - - - ,= = = = pI' Ill" II (I I! Ilflll! , III! II ~ - NAO..'II AVEli\E s , I I , ,\ QOlf' l. S.f.. , I ! I I \ I j I . ~o~ ~F. CLlI11f ><0.... I , : ICJDS,.DlG'tOll COAT 'II.CI'OQ' I ,"'.... ' . ~.".: f "'El"'''''. , ~!;:ooo Sf .. i .., '" t1 i a: ~ Z W () !Xl ::l J: 4; o 4; () a: 4; w J: I- JllIlllJll I~ = -=:; . ;:v. ~. = n I " 111111 ",I. I: t . flOSS DfID:r Jl). Io.Ea '21 ~4l/ . ~f. , I 1OlA\- ~..1l10~t4~A~: -r:prAl PAf!:lC/)'.\6r~~t=). .,i I 1.-q&1~YSF 1,200 re.y\4"~ "t~(.S" I ,r . . . e . '. ''- ", - PARKING SURVEY 10/4/00 ." PROJECT LOCATION: 131 I-A BALWIN A VI!:. ARCADIA. CA" PURPOSE OF SURVEY: 2622 SQllAR FOOT OF RETAIL SPACE CHANGE TO CAFF.. APPRX. 50% OF SPACE WILLBE USE AS COMPUTER INTERNET AREA. . SURVEY BV: WAil SING DESIGN ANI> CONSTRUCTION CO, 32 E. LINDA VISTA AVE. ALHAMBRA. CA 911101 TEL: /i2(.-3011-9491 DATE ANI> PARKING SP PARKEI> SP VACANT SP %OF T1ME._ -- VACANT SP -, -~------- 10-3-00 217 107 110 50.7'Yo, n:30AM i 0-3-00 217 ll/i '14 43.3% 12:30PM 10-3-00 217 101 ll/i 4/iSY. __3:00PM ,-. - ...--- --- -.. --- - - --. . ,_. - . ---~.- -- --_.- .. , .. ... ..,-.. -- 10-3-00 217 141 76 35% 5:00PM 10-3-00 217 110 107 49,3% 7:00PM . - ...,tt:b7)~~~.~((>- '\' ,.. ^ Ci--~{Qo.+:(1"-- j . kf J- VU'\ $ 0.1 v-r 0 I\. , l~ II ps. ~/,,o7 1//>0. '. /'<..rc-().j;{}.... / I r_V-?-p-p J-1pN .:--- , . PIt '10 'Ol 1[". .~ ~. ,~ ,PP . +'1,?~- \lk~ [., A-I ~L'tZSE l.EST. 1 QUJOA, ~t lUll 3 JSn-Y cute 4 l!AUTT S9,nt ..--' 5)U;:DUCCI!oop : I 6 niU zn:c . i/ ' UlltCAJ.nEiS I a c.",.aM'oi:w : . en """"t ct.. \1 100f:':OtftnY - 11 CLEA1IEiS 12 ...VJr.:lU..BLl ~ E~I'i:'n.-i'iIDto 1= 1 S'tI.QUCU :- ) flAHt-tt-!.b, =. .4 .;Do"El.D s ((C.\J\.OIW9 , Sl!OtlUAu. 7 St."'S\IAY S ~""IL SIIl't.la 1 JZAL EST.\~ 19U_U11' S.I.tE>>f[ 1.1 U.RaER 11 AJl7"SQIOQL !) SL"l?LY sOoP'..J.tS 8UILDlXG A ~ - 1= I~ 1;= i~ :], 12 --f: 11 ~=J: 1~ ;:: I 8 .:- 7 :t:: .~: ~, J -:. "'r-- -I: '- 3 0, - =1; 2 . - ~ - ---.- 1 i - - '. . j PIli illll \11111 r, U 1111111111111111111 Jill tJ I' I ~ . 'IfOodp...W:1OO" U III J Jllllin Jill J;""i III1 In! i III J I J - t:' =- ~ ~ _ c::::= = = = = - - - - - - :::=:: - <--.-: = = =, = n! 11:11 Iii 11 1'1111 !Ill III 111: 1111111 q .- llUAlln: !lOAD , I ===1 ;--\ .' I!! ....."IC'-3 S'nUC1l:Mf , j' lIUILDIaG 11 ~. ~~." ... ~ =z:::. ~ ~ .........~... = "SEE ~ .~ = = ~ ,,"-~"'-' . .,~-~~ ~ _........, w-:r. -~_..,.A . ~ ~::...;: =-= ==- -~.~ === ;1 1\l1ijlID lJl' I ~;J I! 1,:11I11'~ mo..'lI AVE~U: , ' I ," ra """""".... ~~'7..~1' ~,,":4.,& .' , , rt'\i.tJ.-. , . 'J , I I I , I I ml >< :J: - m - ----t ....:. "..,t, , CJ) ~-j ; J < m . -< j > -if :;a I 1 m )> e e . File No,: CUP 00-018 CITY OF ARCADIA 240 WEST HUNTINGTON DRIVE ARCADIA, CA 91007 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT NEGATIVE DECLARATION Adopted: -- 0 R AFT .. Title and Description of Project: Conditional Use Permit CUP 00-018: A conditional use permit to operate a 2.800 sq,fl. internet cafe, from 12:00 p,m. to 12:00 a.m" seven (7) days a week, Location of Project: 1311 S. Baldwin AVenue #A Arcadia, CA 91007 Name of Applicant or Project Sponsor: Applicant: Paul Hsiao 2822 W. Valley Blvd, Alhambra, CA 91007 Contact: Same (626) 576"8162 Finding: The Planning Commission. having reviewed the Initial Study of this proposed project and having reviewed the written comments received prior to the public hearing of the Planning Commission, including the recommendation of the City's staff, does hereby find and declare that the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment based on the consistency of the proposed project with the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance and the inclusion of the following mitigation measure: . The square footage of the Internet cafe shall be a maximum of 2,800 sq,ft. and the seating shall be limited to 58 seats for the cafe use and 29 seats for the intemet use, The Planning Commission hereby finds that this Negative Declaration reflects its independent judgment. A copy of the Initial Study may be obtained at the location listed below. The location and custodian of the documents and any other material which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City based its decision to adopt this Negative Declaration are as follows: City of Arcadia Development SerVices Dept./Community Development Division/Planning Services 240 West Huntington Drive Arcadia, CA 91007 Staff member: Kenneth Phung, Assistant Planner (626) 574-5447 Date RCiceived for Filing: e . @) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I. Project Title: Conditional Use Pennit No, 00-018 2, Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Arcadia Development Services Department Community Development Division I Planning Services 240 W, Huntington Drive P.O, Box 60021 Arcadia, CA 91066-6021 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Kenneth Phung (626) 574.5447 4, Project Location: 1311 S, Baldwin Avenue #A 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: PauLHsiao 2822 W. Valley Blvd, Alhambra, CA 91007 (626) 576-8162 6. GeneralPlan Designation: Commercial 7. Zoning: C-2 8. Description of Project: (Describe the whole, action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off-site features necessary for its implementatlDn. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary.): A Conditional Use Pennitto operate a 2,800 sq.ft, internet cafe from 12:00 p,ro, to 12:00 a,m" 7 days a week, 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: (Briefly describe the project's surroundings.) North: South: East: West: General commercial uses; zoned C.2 and C-2 & D Retail Shopping Center (Sav-On) and mixed residen~al uses; zoned C-2 General corrimercial uses; zoned C-2 & H Vons,Pavilion and retail shops; ,zoned C-2 10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, fmancing approval, or participation agreement): City Engineering Division I City Maintenance Department I City Water Di;vision I Los Angeles County Engineer . ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: CEQAFORMS/CHECKLIST Page 1 of4 The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages, e Aesthetics Agriculture Resources Air Quality - Biological Resources Cultural Resources Geology I Soils - Hazards & Hazardous Hydrology I Water Quality Land Use I Planning Materials Noise "'- Population I Housing Mineral Resources Recreation Transportation I Traffic - Public Services Mandatory Findings of Utilities! Service Systems Significance DETERMINATION (fo be completed by,the Lead Agency): On the basis of this initial evaluation: - Ifmd that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGA TNE DECLARATION will. be prepared, ' e I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared, I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, I fmd that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact OD the environment, but at least one effect I) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures ba5ed on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, An ENVIRONMENTAL IMP ACT REPORT is required, but itmust analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed, I fmd that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions' or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing,further is required, ~-- ~ Signature Kenneth Phung Printed Name :; 11/2/2000 Date CITY OF ARCADIA For e CITYnR'fPtnB/200020001546265 FORM "J" Page 2 of 4 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: e I) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e,g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone).. A "No hnpact" answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the projectwill not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take'account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on- site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well' as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts, 3) Once the lead agency has determined that.~ particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist-answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant hnpact" entries-when the determination is made, an ElR isrequire& 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less than Significant hnpact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level ' (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses;" may be cross-referenced), . 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program ElR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier ElR or negative declaration, Section 15063(c)(3)(D), In this case, a briefdi5cussionshould identify the following: a) Earlier Analyses Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed, Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis, c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references tQ information sources for potential impacts (e.g. general plans, zoning ordinances), Reference to a previously prepared or outside,docwnent should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated, - CITYIRVPUB/2000/313785 FORM "r' Page,] of4 7) Supporting Information Sources, A source list, should be attached, and other sources.used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion, e 8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions form this checklist that are relevant to a project',s environmental effects in whatever forrnatis selected, 9) The explanation of each issue should identify: a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate. each question; alld b) the mitigation measure identified, if any"to reduce the impact to less than significance. . . CITY/RVPUBI2000/313785 FORM "J" Page 4 of4 . e e Issues: I. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) SubstantiaIIy damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, tress,rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c) SubstantiaIIy degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day'or nighttime views in the area? Tbeproposed internet cafe will be in an existing commercial building, any exterior improvements will be required to comply with local architectural standards and iUumination limits and will not result in any of the above impacts. II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Con~ervation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland, Would the project: a)Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program ofthe California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for' agricultural use, or' a Williamson Act contract? CITYIRVPUB/20002000/546265 1 Potentially Significant Impact File No: CUP 00-018 Less Than Significant With Less Than Mitigation Significant No lmpacl IncotpOrated Impact x x x x x x FORM"!" e e e Issues: c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, tonDn-agricultural use? The proposal is consistent with the commercial designation in the General Plan and with the C-2 zoning of the site, and is required to comply with the regulatio\ls any other jurisdictional agency with applicable environmental regulations. The proposal is for a commercial use, which is consistent with the surrounding development. In, AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations~ Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the ,applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient ,air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? CITY IR VPUB/2000200015;46265 2 Potentially Significant Impact FileNo: CUP 00-018 Less Than Significant With Less Than Mitigation Significant No lmpacl Incorporated Impact x ~ x x x x FORM"]" e . . I, Issues: e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? The proposed internet cafe and its operation will be subject to local air quality regulations as administered by the South Coast Air Quality Management District which should prevent any impacts relative to items (a) and/or (b) above, There are no exterior improvements proposed that would result,in alterations to air movement,mDisture or temperature, or cause a change in climate. No objectionable odors have been associated with the proposed use. IV, BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species ,in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department ofFish ,and Game or V,S, Fish and WildlifeService? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department ofFish and Game or V.S, Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native ,resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident,or migratory wildlife corridor5, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? CITY /RVPUB/20002000/546265 3 Potentially Significant Impact File No: CUP 00-018 Less Than Significant With Less Than Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated (mpacl x - x x x x FORM "J" e . e Issues: e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as,a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? The proposed internet cafe will be located in an existing commercial building in a commercial area. None of the above circumstances exist. V. CULTURAl.. RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause,a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in 9 15064.5? b) , Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to 9 15064,5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside oHonnal cemeteries? The proposed use will be in an existing commercial building. None of the above resources have been identified at th~ subject area, and none of the impacts have been associated with the proposed use. VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS -- Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk'of 105s, injury or death involving: CITY IR VPUB120002000/546265 4 Potentially Significant Impact - File No: CUP 00-018 Less Than Significant With Less Than Mitigation Significant No impact Incorporated Impact x x x x x x x FORM "J" e . . Issues: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist fOr the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer, to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including , liquefaction? iiii) Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil; ~ defmed in Table 18-1- B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks t>raltemative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the dispo~al of waste water? While this entire region is subject to the effects of seismic activity, the subject location has not been determined to be especiaUy susceptible to any of the above geologIcal or soil problems. VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: CITY /R VPUB/20002000/546265 5 Potentially Significant Impact - File No: CUP 00-018 Less Than Significant With Less Than Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact x x x x x x x 'X FORM "J" e . e Issues: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accidentconditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed s~hool? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of. hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code section 65962.5 and, asa result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles ofa public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) Fora project within the vicinity ofa private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? CITYIRVPUB/2000200Ql546265 6 File No: CUP 00-018 Less Than Significant With Less Than Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Potentially Significant Impact - - x - x x x x x x FORM "J" e e e Issues: h) Expose people or structures to uignificant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? The City Building Services and the City Fire Department will review the plans for the ,bar to prevent any of the above impacts. No existing sources of potential health hazards have been identified at tbe subject property. VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be' a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g" the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to alevel which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, inclUding through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off.site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoffl t) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? elTYlR VPUB/20002000/546265 7 Potentially Sfgnificant Impact - File No: CUP 00-018 Less Thoo Significant With Less Than Mitigation Significant No Impacl Incorporated Impact x x x ,- x - x x x FORM"]" e . e Issues: g) Place housing within a lOO-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? i) Place within a lOO-year flood hazar<;l area structures which would .impede or redirect flood flows? j) Expose people or structures toa significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding'as a result of the failure ofa levee or dam? k) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, ormudflow? The proposed site alterations would not result. in any of the above Impacts. IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with aIiy applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? The proposed internet cafli is consistent with the general plan and zDning designation for the area, and will complement surrounding uses. The requested use permit is a permit process to establish specific conditions for the consideration of allowing the bar within the City of Arcadia. Such a permit will not affect existing land uses or general plan designations. ' The operation of the proposed business will be subject to all other environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with'jurlsdiction over this area. There are no agricultural resources or operations In the vicinity. CITY/RVPUB/20002000/546265 8 Potentially Signifieant Impact - File No: CUP 00-018 Less Than Significant With Less Than Mitigation Significant No lmpacl Incorporated Impact x x x x x x x FORM "J" e e e Issues: X.MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability ora locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? The proposed internet cafe will be required to comply with adDpted energy conservation requirements. None of the above impacts have been associated with the proposed type of use. No mineral resources are known to exist at the site. XI, NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan,or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation,of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c) Asubstantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic'increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airpDrt, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive, noise levels? CITYIRVPUB/20002000/546265 9 Potentially Significant~ Impact - File No, CUP 00-018 Less Than Significant With Less Than Mitigation Significant No lmpacl Incorporated Impact x x x - x x x x FORM "J" File No; CUP 00-018 LessTblm Issues; Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitig~tion Significant No Impact e Impact Incorporated Impacl f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, X would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? The site of the proposed use is in an existing commercial building in a commercial area and none of the above impacts is associated with this location or the proposed use. Should any problems arise however, compliance with noise regulations will prevent any unreasonable noise levels. xn. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce, substantial population growth in an area, either X directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of road or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, X necessitating the construction of replacement housing . elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating X ~ the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? The proposed service is consistent with the general plan and zoning designations for the area and will not impact the population or housing. XllI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project; a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services; Fire protection? '- X X Police protection? . CITY IR VPUB1'20002000/546265 FORM "J" 10 e e e Issues: Schools? Parks? Other public facilities? The proposed use is consistent with the planned uses for the area and will not result in any of the above Impacts. XIV. RECREATION. Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that.substantial physical deterioration, of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the' construction or expansion of recreational facilities which have an adverse physical effect on the environment? The proposed use will be located In an existing commercial building, and the proposed project will not re~ult in any of the above Impacts. XV, TRANSPORTATION ITRAFFlC. Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e" result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? CrrYntVPtnB/20002000/54626S 11 Potentially Significant Impact File No: CUP 00-018 Less Than Significant With Less Than Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact x x x x x x x x FORM "J" e . . Issues: g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? It is Dot anticipated that any of the above utilities or service systems will be significantly impacted. Nevertheless, the proposed improvements will be reviewed for, and the developer will be required to provide, if necessary, any new systems or supplies necessary to mitigate any such impacts. xvn, MANDA TORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat or a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustainirtg levels, threaten , to elimirtate,a plant or animal commWlity, reduce the number Or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate .important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that arC'individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively cDnsiderable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed irt connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current project, and the effects of probable future projects,) c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? The proposed use will be in an existing commercial building, the proposed project will not result in any of the above impacts. CITY /RVPUB/20002000/546265 13 Potentially Significant Impact File No: CUP 00-018 Less Than Significant With Less Than Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact x x x x FORM "J" e Date Filed: FileNo, (;UP OO,QI8 CITY OF ARCADL4 240 WEST HUNTINGTON DRIVE ARCADIA. CA 91007 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM OCT 23, 2000 General Information . (iCafeStation) 1. Applicant's Name: PAUL HSIAO Address: 2822 W. VALLEY BLVD., ALHAMBRA, CA.91803 2. l?roperty Address (Location): 'fAssessor's Number: 1311 A. BALDWIN AVE., ARCADIA, CA.91007 -(; 18S 42336 3, Name, address and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project: PAUL HSIAO (6261576-8162 4. List and desqribe.any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: N/A 5. Zone Classification: c-'2,. C 6, General Plan Designation: Proiect Description Q G 10. @ 12. 13, .14, INTERNET CAFE 7. Proposed use of site (project description): Site size: 28,00 S.F. Square footage,per building: ---f lon-d!- Number of floors of construction: 1 o;'J2..ct. ..\-~.(, FLOOR A-H"',h~.J \ ( Z48. 7 ,?2. S:P) Amount of off-street parking provided: 1200 PARKING SPACES Proposed scheduling of project: JAN. 01, 200~ INT. REMODELING Anticipated incremental development: If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household sizes expected: N/A e 15. If commercial, indicate the type, Le, neighborhood, city .or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading facilities, hours of operation: OPEN FROM: lOAM - 10PM IN COMMERCIAL RETAIL STORE CONVERTING TO INTERNET CAFE, 2622 SF 16. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift" and loading facilities: N/A 17. [f institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project: N/A 18, If the project involves a variance, conditional use permit or zoning application, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required: N/A Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? .sheets as necessary). 22, 23, 24, 25. 26. en. Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional YES NO 19. Change in existing features of any hills, or substantial alteratin of ground contours, 0 IiJ 0 IiJ 0 I2U 0 IiJ 0 IiJ 0 IiJ 0 IiJ 0 IiJ 0 Ii! E.I,R. 04/12100 Page 2 20, Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or publiclands or roads 21. Change in pattern, scale or character of general area of project. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. Change in dust, ash, smoke,fumes or odors ,in vicinity, Change in ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage pattersn. Substanti!ll change in existing noise or vibration levels'in the vicinity. Is site on filled land or on any slopes of 10 percent or more, Use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammable or explosives, ~8. 29. 30. 31. 32, 33, 34, .5, YES NO Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police; fire, water, sewage; etc,) o Substantial increase in fossil fuel consumption (electricity, 011, natural gas, etc, o Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. o Storm water system discharges from areas for materials storage, vehicle or equipment fueling, vehicle or equipment.maintenance (including washing), waste handling, hazardous materials handling or storage delivery or loading docks, or other outdoor work areas? o A significantly envirorunentally harmful increase in the flow rate or volume of storm water runoff? o A significantly'environmentally harmful increase in erosion of the project site or'surrounding areas? o Storm water discharges that would significantly impair the beneficial uses of receiving waters or areas that provide water quality benefits (e.g. riparian corridors, wetlands, etc,)? o Harm to the biological integrity of drainage systems and water bodies? o Envir~nmental SettiD~ I:iI C! 1]1 ~ ail I:El liI I:iI 36, Describe (on a separate sheet) the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects, any existing structures on the sile, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted, 37. Describe (on a separate sheet) the surrounding properties, including information on plants, animals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects, Indicate the type of larid uses (residential, commercial, etc,), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc,),and scale of development (height, frontage, set- backs, rear yards, etc.), Attach photographs of the vicinity, Snapshots or Polaroid, photos will be accepted, Certification I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date e \ o/~ 60 lA, __ l'~~. ~ ~ ~ Signature _..--n- I----~i,~-f i~ ..........__, . E,I.R. 04112/00 Page 3 e e e CALIFORNIA ALL.PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT 1 I 1 State of Califomia County of I.rs A-r eI~~ On ! () -) 3 -.)riil }ss. &Itc M. L~ Nam9 end TIlle of OffICer (e,g., "Jane'Doe. Notary Publlc1 Nam8{S) _of Signer(S) ~perSOnallY known to me proved to me on the basis of satisfactory e idence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/shelthey executed the same In his/herltheir authorized capacity(les), and that by his/herltheir signatufe(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. , I seal. OPTIONAL Though-the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to'persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. "" , .1 ~ I , <J I ! , , ~ ~ .~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~".,:>.~~~~~J Cl 1991 ~donal Notary AssoeIatlon. 9350 De Solo Ave.;'P.O. Bo?: 2402 . Chatsworth. CA 91313.2402 Prod, No. 5907 Rearoer,.CalI Toll-Free 1-BQ0..8i'6-.6B27 I' , before me, , p~ H9<~ Date personally appeared " J - - - - :~ ~ _ ~ CD..~::-I~4B2 ~ I~~~~~I' PlsC$ Notary Seal Above Description of Attached Document TIUe or Type of Document: Document.Date: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: I, 1 I' I Capacity(les) Claimed by Signer Signer's Name: o Individual o Corporate, Officer - TIUe(s): o Partner - 0 Limited 0 General o Attomey in Fact o Trustee o Guardian or Conservator o Other: " I I, ~ Signer Is Representing: Number of Pages: RlGHTTHUM8PRINT OF SIGNER TOp,of lhumb here J~~~~~;'~~f