Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1620 . RESOLUTION NO. 1620 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. CUP 00-014 FOR A 2,110 SQUARE FOOT COFFEEHOUSE, AND APPROVING A PARKING MODIFICATION FOR THE COFFEEHOUSE AND A 2,381 SQUARE FOOT DENTAL OFFICE AT 29 E. HUNTINGTON DRIVE. WHEREAS,'on July 27,2000, an application was filed by Hanfu Lee, DDS, a Professional Dental Corporation for a 2,110 square foot coffeehouse, and for a parking modification for the coffeehouse and a proposed 2,381 square foot dental office at the rear of the building; Development Services Department Case No. CUP 00-014, at 29 E. Huntington Drive, more particularly described as follows: Lot 8 of Block 74 of A Part Of Arcadia Santa Anita Tract in the City of Arcadia, County of Los Angeles, State of California as recorded in Miscellaneous Records, Book 15, Pages 89 & 90 of the Office of the Recorder of Said County. . WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on September 12, 2000, at which time all interested persons were given full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the factual data submitted by the Development Services Department in the attached report dated September 12, 2000 are true and correct. SECTION 2. This Commission finds: 1. That the granting of the Conditional Use Permit will not be detrimental to the public health or welfare, nor injurious to the property or improvements in the zone or vicinity. 2. That the use applied for at the location indicated is properly one for which a Conditional Use Permit is authorized. 3. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate said use, and all yards, spaces, walls, fences, parking, loading, . . . . landscaping and other features required to adjust said use with the land and uses in the neighborhood. 4. That the site abuts streets and highways adequate in width and pavement type to carry the kind of traffic generated by the proposed use. 5. That the subject property is designated for commercial use in the General Plan, that the proposed use is consistent with that designation, and that the granting of the Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the comprehensive general plan. 6. That the evaluation of the environmental impacts as set forth in the initial study are appropriate and that the project will have no significant effect upon the environment within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, arid, when considering the project as a whole, there was no evidence before the City that the proposed project would have any potentially adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends, and therefore, a Negative Declaration should be approved. SECTION 3. That for the foregoing reasons this Commission approves Conditional Use Permit No. CUP 00-014 for a 2,110 square foot coffeehouse, and for a parking modification for the coffeehouse and a proposed 2,381 square foot dental office at the rear of the building at 29 E. Huntington Drive, subject to the following conditions: 1. The uses approved by CUP 00-014 and the related parking modification shall be limited to a 2,110 square foot coffeehouse and a 2,381 square foot dental office. The coffeehouse, dental office, and the site shall be maintained consistent with the plans submitted and approved for CUP 00-014 to the satisfaction of the Community Development Administrator. 2. All local code requirements regarding accessibility, fire protection, occupancy, and safety shall be complied with to the satisfaction of Building Official and the Fire Marshall, and shall include, but are not limited to the following: a. The posting of maximum occupancy load signs and an approved seating plan for the coffeehouse. -2- 1620 . . . b. A second accessible restroom for the coffeehouse. c. Installation by a C-16 licensed contractor of a NFPA 13 (1996 Edition) fully automatic fire sprinkler system equipped with quick-response type heads, with all underground work in accordance with NFPA 24, and monitoring by a central station. d. Installation of an NFPA 72, fully automatic and fully addressable fire alarm system With all components and transmissions reporting to a central station. e. A certified copy of the central station monitoring contract shall be presented to the Fire Marshall before occupancy of either business. f. Posting of the "Fire Alarm Room" and Knox boxes with keys at each entrance. g. A fire hydrant must be within 150 feet of the fire department connection. 3. Water services shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Public Works Services Director, including any upgrades of the water meter(s) and the installation of any necessary backflow devices and pressure vacuum breakers. 4. Minimum Best Management Practices for National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) measures shall be incorporated to the satisfaction of the Public Works Services Director. 5. A Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) shall be provided and complied with to the satisfaction of the Public Works Services Director. 6. Trash and recyclables containers and a grease receptacle if necessary, shall be provided and stored in a decorative masonry enclosure with solid metal gates finished to match the building to the satisfaction. of the Community Development Administrator. 7. The following parking related items shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Community Development Administrator: a. A Modification for 7 parking spaces (4 on.site & 3 in Parking District Two) in lieu of 18 spaces is granted for this Conditional Use Permit under the Shared-Use Parking Standards of the CBD zoning regulations. This Modification does not constitute an approval of a general reduction of the parking requirement for ~ 1620 . . . the commercial building, but rather only for the specific uses approved by this CUP and parking modification. b. The parking spaces shall be re-striped in accordance with the City's parking regulations. c. An agreement, per Section 9264.3.4 of the CBD zoning regulations, in a form approved by the City Attorney, shall be executed and recorded by the property owner establishing the non-exclusive and shared-use status of the parking behind the building. This Agreement is to become effective when an adjacent or nearby prqperty also participates in the Shared-Use parking provisions as determined by the Community Development Administrator. d. The 3 standard on-site parking spaces shall be restricted to a maximum time limit of two hours, and signs stating such shall be conspicuously posted on each parking space. 8. Approval of CUP 00-014 shall not take effect until the property owner and applicant haveexeCl.ited and filed the Acceptance Form available from the Development Services Department to indicate awareness and acceptance of the conditions of approval. 9. All conditions of approval shall be complied with prior to completion of the tenant improvements, and opening of the coffeehouse and/or dental office. Noncompliance with the plans, provisions and conditions of CUP 00-014 shall constitute grounds for immediate suspension and/or revocation of any approvals, which could result in closing of the coffeehouse and/or dental office. SECTION 4. The decision, findings, and conditions of approval contained in this Resolution reflect the Planning Commission's action of September 12, 2000, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Bruckner, Kalemkiarian and Murphy NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Huang ABSTAIN: None -4- 1620 . . . SECTION 5. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and shall cause a copy to be forwarded to the City Council of the City of Arcadia. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 1620 was adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on September 12, 2000, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Commissioner Huang ABSTAIN: None Commissioners Bruckner, Kalemkiarian and Murphy None , APPROVED AS TO FORMi ~p~ Stephen P. Deitsch, City Attorney City of Arcadia -5- 1620 STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMrnNTSER~CESDEPARTMENT September 12, 2000 TO: Arcadia City Planning Commission FROM: Donna L. Butler, Community Development Administrator By: James M. Kasama, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Application No. CUP 00-014 tor a coffeehouse at 29 E. Huntington Drive. SUMMARY Dr. Hanfu Lee submitted this Conditional Use Permit application for a 2,110 square foot coffeehouse at 29 E. Huntington Drive. The project also includes parking modifications for the proposed coffeehouse, and for the applicant's 2,381 square foot dental office which will occupy the rear 1,013 square feet of the existing building and a 1,368 square foot addition to the rear ofthe building. The Development Services Department is recommending approval subject to the conditions listed in this report. . !3ENERAL INFORMATION APPLICANT: Hanfu Lee, DDS - A Professional Dental Corporation LOCATION: 29 E. Huntington Drive REQUEST: A Conditional Use Permit for a 2,110 square foot coffeehouse, and parking modifications for the proposed coffeehouse and a proposed 2,381 square foot dental office at the rear of the building. SITE AREA: 7,000 square feet (0.16 acre) FRONTAGE: 50 feet along E. Huntington Drive EXISTING LAND USE & ZONING: The site is improved with a 3,123' square foot commercial building. The property is zoned CaD - Central Business District. SURROUNDING LAND USES & ZONING: North: City Parking District NO.2 South: Retail - zoned CaD East: General Offices - zoned CaD West: Mixed Commercial - zoned CBD . GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial . . . BACKGROUND The applicant purchased the property in 1996 with the intention of moving his dental practice into the existing building. However, at that time the CBD zoning included the requirement that the front 1/3 of the building be occupied by retail uses. The applicant, therefore, developed plans to add onto the building. His dental practice would occupy the rear 2/3 of the expanded building, and the front 1/3 would be leased to a retail use. Modification No. MC 96-051 was approved for 7 parking spaces in lieu of 14 spaces for a dental office and retail use. On May 5, 1998 the Arcadia Redevelopment Agency approved the applicant's architectural concept plans for the addition and remodel of the building subject to approval of a parking modification, and on July 14, 1998 the Planning Commission .approved Conditional Use Permit Application No. CUP 98-013 submitted by the Arcadia Presbyterian Church to operate a 1,371 square foot coffeehouse and a parking modification for 7 spaces in lieu of 31 spaces for the coffeehouse and a 2,749 sqiJare foot dental office. That CUP and the related parking modification expired without being implemented. In August of 1999, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2112, which amended the CBO zoning by repealing the front 1/3 retail requirement along Huntington Drive. The applicant still wishes to add onto and remodel the building, and have a retail space in front and his dental practice in the rear portion of the building. On March 28,2000, Modification No. MC 00-016 was approved for 7 parking spaces in lieu of 25 spaces for a dental office and retail use. The applicant is now requesting this CUP to use. the front retail portion for a coffeehouse. This proposal has been slightly revised from the plan submitted for CUP 98-013 to provide a larger waiting room for the dental office. This current remodel and addition proposal was reviewed and approved by the Redevelopment Agency on May 2, 2000. PROPOSAL & ANALYSIS There are two parts to this addition and remodel project. The first part is to have the front 2,110 square feet of the building available for use as a coffeehouse with daily hours of operation of 6:00 a.m. to 12:00 midnight, and entertainment two nights a week. The second part is to use the rear 2,381 square feet of the building for a dental office with hours of operation of 9;00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. Coffeehouse The request for a coffeehouse is only conceptual at this time. There is no specific tenant, and a floor plan has not been developed. The applicant thinks that this location is a good one for a coffeehouse. It is centrally located in the downtown business core along Huntington Drive, and an existing easement through the lot CUP 00-014 September 12, 2000 Page 2 of 7 . . . provides for pedestrian access from the City's Parking District and for the businesses to the north of the Parking District. The parking requirement for a coffeehouse is 10 spaces per 1,000 gross square feel For 2,110 square feet, 21 parking spaces are required. The proposal for. the coffeehouse includes allowing operation from 6:00 a.m. to 12:00 midnight, seven days a week. The hours .of operation for a retail use at this location would not be restricted because it is not within 150 feet of residentially zoned property. The entertainment aspect of the proposal will be subject to the City's Entertainment Permit process, which is administered by the Business License Permit and Review Board. Because this is a foodservice use, a second accessible restroom is required by the Plumbing Code, and it is subject to review and approval of a Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan as administered by the Public Works Services Department. Dental Office The proposed dental office will have 2,381 square feet of gross floor area. It will occupy the rear 1,013 square feet of the existing building, and 1,368 square feet that is to be added to the building. The floor plan includes 6 operatories, a lab, an X-ray room, an office, a receptionist's area, a waiting room, and a restroom. The business hours will be 9:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. A dental office is not subject to a Conditional Use Permit. It is included in this application because it requires a parking modification. The parking requirement for dental offices is 6 spaces per 1,000 gross square feet. For 2,381 square feet, 15 parking spaces are required. Parkin a The proposed remodel and addition, which was conditionally approved by the Redevelopment Agency on May 2, 2000 includes 4 on-site parking spaces (3 standard spaces & 1 van accessible handicap space) and the property is allotted 3.spaces in City Parking District NO.2. The proposed coffeehouse and dental office require a combined total of 36 parking spaces. There is a defiCiency of 29 spaces, so the required parking modification is 7 spaces in lieu of 36 spaces. In the CBD zone, additions to existing buildings, rehabilitation of existing buildings, or changes in use or occupancy in existing buildings are eligible to utilize the Alternative Shared-Use Parking Standards provided that a parking agreement with the City is signed and recorded by the property owner. In this case, there will be an addition and rehabilitation of the existing building, and a change in use. Therefore, this project is eligible to use the Alternative Shared-Use Parking Standards. The Alternative Shared-Use Parking Standards prOVides the following requirements for this proposal: 3 spaces per 1,000 gross square feet for the dental office, and 5 spaces per 1,000 gross square feet for the coffeehouse. These standards result in a combined total parking requirement of 18 spaces for the two uses which reduces the CU P 00-014 September 12,2000 Page 3 of 7 . . . deficiency for this project by 18 parking spaces; from 29 spaces to 11 spaces. The required parking modification under the Alternative Shared-Use Parking Standards is 7 spaces in lieu of 18 spaces. The Shared-Use status of the parking on this property would not become effective until an adjacent or nearby property also participates in the Shared-Use parking provisions. At this time, there are no properties along the north side of Huntington Drive, between Santa Anita and First Avenues that participate in the Alternative Shared-Use Parking provisions. Staff's opinion is that the proposed combination of uses will not have an adverse impact upon the available parking in the area. Observations of City Parking District No. 2 indicate that there is adequate available parkihg in the center portion of the District. Most of the daytime coffeehouse clientele will probably be downtown pedestrian traffic, and after business hours, there is plenty of parking available. The dental office will operate on an appointment basis, which will limit the demand on parking at any particular time. Because a coffeehouse is a type of business that is being encouraged in this area to promote pedestrian activity, and based on the available parking and participation in the Shared-Use Parking program, it is staff's opinion that the parking deficiency is not substantial enough to disapprove the parking modification. However, because there will be only 3 standard on-site parking spaces, staff thinks that these spaces should be available for the clientele of either the coffeehouse or dentist, and should not be used for long tenn, or all day parking by the employees of either business. Therefore, the 3 standard on-site spaces' should be restricted to a maximum time limit of two hours. This will also facilitate the Shared-Use of these parking spaces, should that ever be Implemented. CeQA Pursuant to the prOVISIons of the California Environmental Quality Act, the Development Services Department has prepared an initial study for the proposed project. Said initial study did not disclose any substantial or potentially substantial adverse change in any of the physical conditions within the area affected by the project including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, ambient noise and objects of historical or aesthetic significance. When considering the record as a whole, there is no evidence that the proposed project will haveaflY potential for adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Therefore, a Negative Declaration has been drafted for this project. RECOMMENDATION The Development Services Department recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit No. CUP 00-014 subject to the following conditions: CUP 00-014 September 12, 2000 Page 4 of 7 . 1. The uses approved by CUP 00-014 and the related parking modification shall be limited to a2,110 square foot coffeehouse and a 2,381 square foot dental office. The coffeehouse, dental office, and the site shall be maintained consistent with the plans submitted and approved for CUP 00-014 to the satisfaction of the Community Development Administrator. 2. All local code requirements regarding accessibility, fire protection, occupancy, and safety shall be complied with to the satisfaction of Building Official and the Fire Marshall, and shall include, but are not limited to the following: a. The posting of maximum occupancy load signs and an approved seating plan for the coffeehouse. b. A second accessible restroom for the coffeehouse. c. Installation by a C-16 licensed contractor of a NFPA 13 (1996 Edition) fully automatic fire sprinkler system equipped with quick-response type heads, with all underground work in accordance with NFPA 24, and monitoring by a central station. d. Installation of an NFPA 72, fully automatic and fully addressable fire alarm system with all components and transmissions reporting to a central station. e. A certified copy of the central station monitoring contract shall be presented to the Fire Marshall before occupancy of either business. f. Posting of the "Fire Alarm Room" and Knox boxes with keys at each entrance. g. A fire hydrant must be within 150 feet of the fire department connection. 3. Water services shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Public Works Services Director, including any upgrades of the water meter(s) and the installation of any necessary backflow devices and pressure vacuum breakers. 4. Minimum aest Management Practices for National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) measures shall be incorporated to the satisfaction of the Public Works Services Director. . 5. A Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) shall be provided and complied with to the satisfaction of the Public Works Services Director. 6. Trash and recyclables containers and a grease receptacle if necessary, shall be provided and stored in a decorative masonry enclosure with solid metal gates finished to match the building to the satisfaction of the Community Development Administrator. . 7. The following parking related items shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Community Development Administrator: a. A Modification for 7 parking spaces (4 on-site & 3 in Parking District Two) in lieu of 18 spaces is granted for this Conditional Use Permit under the CUP 00-014 September 12, 2000 Page 5 of 7 . . . Shared-Use Parking Standards of the ceD zoning regulations. This Modification does not constitute an approval of a general reduction of the parking requirement for the commercial building, but rather only for the specific uses approved by this CUP and parking modification. b. The parking spaces shall be re-striped in accordance with the City's parking regulations. c. An agreement, per Section 9264.3.4 of the CeD zoning regulations, in a form approved by the City Attorney, shall be executed and recorded by the property owner establishing the non-exclusive and shared-use status of the parking behind the building. This Agreement is to become effective when an adjacent or nearby property also participates in the Shared-Use parking provisions as determined by the Community Development Administrator. d. The 3 standard on-site parking spaces shall be restricted to a maximum time limit of two hours, and signs stating such shall be conspicuously posted on each parking space. 8. Approval of CUP 00-014 shall not take effect until the property owner and applicant have executed and filed the Acceptance Form available from the Development Services Department to indicate awareness and acceptance of the conditions of approval. . 9. All conditions of approval shall be complied with prior to completion of the tenant improvements, and opening of the coffeehouse and/or dental office. Noncompliance with the plans, provisions and conditions of CUP 00-:014 shall COnstitute groundS for immediate suspension and/or revocation of any approvals, which could result in closing of the coffeehouse and/or dental office. FINDINGS AND MOTIONS Aooroval The Planning Commission should move to approve the Negative Declaration and adopt Resolution No. 1620: A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Arcadia, California, granting Conditional Use Permit No. CUP 00-014 for a 2,110 square foot coffeehouse, and approving a parking modification for the coffeehouse and a 2,381 square foot dental office at 29 E. Huntington Drive. Denial If the Planning Commission intends to deny this Conditional Use Permit application, the Commission should move for denial and direct staff to prepare a resolution incorporating the Commission's decision and specific findings. CUP 00-014 September 12, 2000 Page 6 of 7 . . . If any Planning Commissioner, or other interested party has any questions or comments regarding this matter prior to the September 12th pUblic hearing, please contact Associate Planner, Jim Kasama at (626) 574-5445. Approved by: Attachments: Land Use & Zoning Map Plans Negative Declaration & Initial Study Resolution No. 1620 CUP 00-014 September 12, 2000 Page 7 of 7 . . . ) , csO ..l .. cso TOWM: CENTRE I PARKING LOT OFF'fES POST OFFICE , RESTAURANT , . , ... I , . WHEELER AVE. . " 'cJo ' . " " CITY PARKING DISTRICT tI2 OFFICES PRIVATE P~KING LOT <{s.o . ffi Jso W/~ i a: z ill ::I r/////, OU) 0 ::I U) ~~ I !i ii! ~ III .U) III U) f3 ma: m i5 Ul Ul Ul UlUl Ul !:! a: it u ~ U 1/, U U .g g u~ !:l m I&. :J Ul ii: ii: ii: ... -z ! V///// I&. 1&.- ... ~ ... -0 Ul ~ ... ... ... I&. ... l.L.1X u. 0 ~ c 0 /, 0 0 0 0 0... 0 ~ .. .. . .. HUNTINGTON DR. , :g.~ ... a:~ z Cl " ~ :l m 2...~ z~ :l:l 13 OJ 0 RETAIL .~ u 00 Co ~u ...lm ii!ii! ...... u CONVENIENCE u: O;J i:!:x:~ ctUl a:01D 00. u: ... elm f~ CIlu o~... elCl: :z:::I CENTER CllI 0 Cl)CIlO CllICllI) Cl)CIl l.L. ~~ ~u: ...l .. 0 a: o~o - =;. a: a: .oel ~ ii~ ~glD . ::II&. ~...l~ UlZ o C ~o ~ . ctct cO: ::E Ul lDlll -0 ~lD ... CIl III Sl .>0 C~O CIl ::I ...l . I .... .. " LAND USE & ZONING MAP CUP 00-014 t NORTH 29 E. Huntington Drive Scale: 1 inch = 100 feet ... C Q. 'It III III N 'It III III III N III .~ I I .. I II. I ;] 0 ~ l!l I t GI I ~ :I GI I r. r cl: I III ... I ., III C c I c I I c ... I III I ;] cl: . . - ~ r~ --!!.- -" -- o .... - .- " --- - - :I" ..... ~ 3 I '" !i " .. III H .I 'I I, - - .~~.'.' J.~13, SF.' . I- " . I , I I I . -=-~. - -- ..,..~-- IDI~JIlIJl:D,- 1tmlL BtID..DIIIG MIEA - AOZS..l'Io ........ ."1 ~ n. ~, " I I, i' I i I " .1 ~,I Ii Ii I ;' .- t-=+QlI' '- .. - - tA-1j ...., I I ---- )-7 -- =-"'=" , - i i 'I ...- I -- ~-I r~.,-rl~i ....- : I i ==:1.. .",-~-- ..... :r.:IJJ,.~~~IDl:~_1'D 'J........... ~72 ...-.-SWQII f'EllI(N&\ ~~A,~~~,.~~~1f '" .....~KflllQR;'l.......-.as ~\IS_~fIlI)" :;;:,... ~,:. ,..... ...... !J3CdI' IDS T1lIII . s> n: fUN _.",..r~ .e ~ -- --.- --.-- -- ...... 11II'I'....."......... FlilC.f1I......-rr":".-o =~~~RR~.._....-'. ~-:.=~.1X3J5'-~1II ~=~'\l==--~"':.-;v.,~~ :m==-~..:u~:~~~", _ .......,r ~ -- ~_ ~.___.~.-.ra:I .. ~~.......u.~,.....NIlII: ~~r.;JIlI'..._;....tuiI_.....,~ ..... ..'......... - -.... ... -- _T~_ i:.::a"..nIft...~~:.--~--=-::.~='..::-- ~~-_.-:v=-;.::_..._-- iiiiiii'iiiiiii.:r.:-:::,I.::='_==--':-.:.;:r_ .111=="1_ - ----- r...._ .....--,,- ----- \\I o . n. Of 10 10 \\I Of 10 III 10 \\I 10 U t ... II. :l o '" l!l t GI '" 3 GI .s: l- e( o \\I .. m o o o I o .. I 01 :l e( . . . - ~~ .", .....~ IL--J ~ ~ .!-----j I . 1\ I I I (!!'" 1l'l''''1llOIT ,o"m - III ~ " ii-ei~~ ( t:~; .- ~ ___- \1 .....- . u------- II '? - I . .__~". '.' ,..",,' ..,' .. 'd" ....-..-~..~ . -.: - --.- I . I I B._ 'u, orE: · ~!f;~ .. 1&1<> 0'\ G' I ~~~" ~ -, .._"'~.....s: ~~\II&l;-~~ t Y ~ In .. 1....1D' "'dl I f.l, 1 .., ,~204I'n :::. ~ t:\ ' : ~"'l I --'y~ :J:..\- " ...........; J!"t~~,~~r~~~ I J--~---~': I .- ," . ,"".' I' .. .-.-~Ar7i.- ~:-""'-"... 'A t I _~ >t;, ",--'___w :y.b,' :;:,,_c >."1 t;l Ii I I -;a- '. ;1:;0;. .'\J}.)..f'l, P .' .;'\ \. , I ~_. ;1 L ;-~'" ~~,~fJn'! ~ M ~ ~ .. ::.:.. ~:..- ~ ~~.:~1X1 ~ ~~ ~ ~ I lll'l I. I , iii -'-- ~,=l'-.:r---::J -"':"IE:~ II' r i I I' I a!:::. _-_ -=- =-- --- ; ::: ._-=--'=-':-: -:- ; ::::;-:- -=- ..:...- 1 - :-..:=. IJ i il I : = : :. I=:J .::::: ~= ==: : :i:::":= -- !B -. _.=-~ ....! I.......~ ~ _ __ __ _ e ' .-..y8Ir14'.- , ___ C'CtS:: I -H _ _ = = ,~'~..~ -- - - . ......________._.:;:'.<A . Ol!lll''''~- -- __ _ __ _ .",.......,,______ _ ~ )f!l;..-- _.. = = = - 8 ...... ~-=-- - - . -it ------~ ~='l~ ".~.:\.-:- ; I 18 _..~ --- --. .. 18 __..... __ --'. . · :..7~-=-~~~-u.-.. ~ ~ ~ ------ . .. ; s-- ~ a. '\....",- ~~~ ~ .- :r_~'~ ':, ; . ~ .."."...,., .' ""'~ '"' .~ , .,:.<r,:.t' ," n,_ ~ ~!,\:, _ -~ FIle No.: CUP 00-014 CITY OF ARCADIA 240 WEST HUNTINGTON DRIVE ARCADIA, CA 91007 . CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT NEGA liVE DECLARA liON Adopted: .. 0 R A F T "" Title and Description of Project: Conditional Use Pennlt No. CUP 00-014: A Conditional Use Pennit to operate a 2,200 square foot coffee shop and parking modifications for the proposed coffee shop and a proposed 2,400 square foot dental office at the rear of the building for which 1,368 square feet will be added onto the existing building. Location of Project: 29 E. Huntington Drive In the City of Arcadia, County of Los Angeles Name of Applicant or Project Sponsor: Hanfu Lee,. A Professional Dental Corporation 10 E. Huntington Drive, Suite-D Arcadia, CA 91006 Contact: Hanfu Lee, DDS (626) 447-4447 Finding: . The Planning Commission, having reviewed the Initial Study of this proposed project and having reviewed the written comments received prior to the public hearing of the Planning Commission, including the recommendation of the City's staff, does hereby find and declare that the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment based on the results of the Initial Study, and the consistency of the proposed project with the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. The ,Planning Commission hereby finds that this Negative Declaration refiectsits independent judgment. A copy of the Initial Study may be obtained at the location listed below. The location and custodian of the documents and any other material which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City based its decision to adopt this Negative Declaration are as follows: city of Arcadia . Development Services Dept,lCommunlty Development DlvlslonIPlannlng Services 240 West Huntington Drive Arcadia, CA 91007 Steff member:. James M. Kasama, Assoclst" Planner (626) 67405446 Date Received for filing By Los Angeles County: (County CIerkSlamp Here) Name of.Los Angeles County Stlffperson . TWe - . , FIle No.: CUP 00.014 CITY OF ARCADIA 240 WEST HUNTINGTON DRIVE ARCADIA, CA 91007 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 1. Project Title: Conditional Use Permit No. CUP 00-014 2. Lead Agency Name & Address: City of Arcadia Development Services Dept./Community Development Div.lPlanning Services 240 W. Huntington Drive Post Office Box 60021 Arcadia, CA 9106lX>021 3. Lead Agency Contact Person & Phone Number: James M. Kasama. Associate Planner - (626) 574-54451 fax (626) 447-9173 4. Project Location (addr:ess): 29 E. Huntington Drive In the City of Arcadia, County of Los Angeles 5. Project Sponsor's Name, Address & Phone Number: Hanfu Lee, A Professional Dental Corporation 10 E. Huntington Drive, Suite-D Arcadia, CA 91006 COntact Hanfu Lee,. DDS (626) 447-4447 6. General Plan Designation: Commercial 7. Zoning Classification: CBD: Central Business District Form Ilor CECA Checklist 4/99 -1- . . . FIle No.: CUP 00.014 8. Description of Project: (Describe the whole action Involved, Including but not limited to later philses of the project, and any secondary, support, or ofl-slle features necassary for Its Implamentation.) A Conditional Use Permit to operate a 2,200 square foot coffee shop and parking modifications for the proposed coffee shop and a proposed 2,400 square foot dental office at the rear of the building for which 1,368 square feet will be added onto the existing building. 9. Surrounding land uses and setting: (Briefly describe the proJect's'surroundlngs.) The area is developed with commercial uses and a large public parking lot is to the rear of the subject property. 10. Other public agencies whose approval is required: (e.g., permits, financing approval. partlclpallon agreement) The City Building Services, Engineering Division, Fire Marshall, Public Works Services, and Water Services will review the construction plans for the addition for compliance with all applicable construction codes and will oversee construction and installation of any necessary infrastructure or improvements within the public right- of-way. The tenant improvements for the coffee shop and dental office will also be reviewed by the Los Angeles County Health Department for compliance with local health codes. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a 'Potentially Significant Impacr as indicated by the checklist on the fOllowing pages: [ ) Aesthetics [ ) Agricultural Resources [ ) Air Quality [ ) Biological Resources [ ) Cultural Resources [ ) Geology I Soils [ ) Hazards & Hazardous Materials [ ) Hydrology I Water Quality [ ) Land Use I Planning [ ) Mineral Resources [ ) Noise [ ] Population I Housing [ ) Public Services [ ] Recreation [ ] Transportation I Traffic [ ) Utilities I Service Systems [ ) Ma"datory Findings of Significance Form. J" -2- CEQACheckllst 4/99 File No.: CUP 00.014 DETERMINATION: . (TCl be completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: [Xl I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. [I I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the applicant A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. [I I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. . [I I find that the proposed project MAY have a .potentially significant impact" or .potentially significant unless mitigated impact" on the environment,. but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. {J I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, but because all potentially significant effects (a) h!3ve been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation me~sures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. By: James M. Kasama, Associate Planner For: City of Arcadia Date: Auaust 18. 2000 . Form "J" .3- CECA Checklist 4/99 . . . File No.: CUP 00-014 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1. A brief explanatloll Is required for all answers except 'No Impact' answers that are adequately supported by the Information sources a lead agency cites In the responses following each question. A "No Impact' answer Is adequately supported If the referenced information sources show that the Impact simply does not apply,to proJects IIkt;t the one Involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A 'No Impact' answer should be explained where it Is based on proJect-specific factors as well as generel standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensltive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). 2. All answers must take account of the whole action Involved, Including off.slte as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project.level, Indirect aswell as direct, and construction as well as operational Impacts. . 3. Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physlcallmpact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the Impact Is potentially significant, less than. significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact' Is appropriate If there Is substantial evidence that an effect Is significant. If there are one or more, 'Potentially Significant Impact" entries when.the determination Ismade, an EIR Is required. 4. 'Negative Declaration: less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated' applies where the Incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from 'Potentially Significant Impact' to a "Less Than Slgnlficantlmpaot.' The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVIII, "Eariler Analyses," must be cross-referenced). 5. Eariier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an . effect has been adequately analyzed In an eariler EIRor Negative Declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(C). In this case, a brief discussion should Identify the following: a) Eariler Analyses Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed In an eariier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mlligatlDn measures based on the ear1ler . analysis c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are 'Less Than Significant With MItigation Measures Incorporated,' describe the mitigation measures which were Incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 6. Lead agencies are encouraged to Incorporate Into the checklist, references to information sources for potential Impacts (e,g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference. to a previously prepared or outside document Should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached. and other sources, uses or Individuals contacted, should be cited in the discussion. 8. This Is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9. The explanation of each lssueshould Identify: a) The significant criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significant. Form 'J" -4- CEQA Checklist 4/99 . . , FIle No.: CUP 00.014 LeBa Than Signlflcanl p<<entIaIIy WIth Less Than SlgnJflcant MIUgalIan SIgntflcant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact I. AESTHETICS - Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? [ I [ I [I [XI b) Substantially damage scenic resources, Including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcropplngs, and historic buildings within a state scenIc hIghway? [ I [ I [I [X) c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and Its surroundings? [ I [ I [I [XI d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? [ I [ I [I [XI The proposed coffee shop will be In an existing commercial building and the proposed dental office will be In a one-story addition to the rear of the existing building. The proJect had been reviewed and approved by through the City's and Redevelopment Agency's Architectural Design Review processes. It. AGRICUL TURAJ. RESOURCES - (In determining whether Impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the california Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the califomla Department of Conservation as an optional model to use In assessing Impacts on agriculture and farmland.) Would the proJect: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of statewide Importance (Farmland) as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the Callfomla Resources Agency, to non. agricultural use? [ I [ I [I [XI b) COnflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? [ I [ I [I [XI c) Involve other changes In the existing environment which, due to theIr locatIon or nature, could result In conversion of Fannland to non-agricultural use? r j ( j [) [XI The proJect is for commercial uses In a fully developed commercial area and will not have any of the above Impacts. III. AIR QUALITY - (Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations.) Would the proposal: a) Conflict with or obstruct Implementation of the applicable Air Quality Plan? ( I ( I [I [XI b) VIolate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or proJected air quality violation? [ I [ I [I [XI c) Result In a cumulatively considerable net Increase of any criteria pollutant for which the proJect region Is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambIent aIr quallly standard (Including releasing emissions, which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? [ I [ ] [I [XI d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? [ I [ I [I [Xl e) Create obJectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? [ I [ I [I [Xl The proJect Is for commercial uses In a fully developed commercial area and will not have any of the above impacts. The proposed uses are subject to any applicable air quality regulations as administered by the South Coast Air Quality Management District. Form-'" -$. CECA ChockIlsl 4199 . . . File No.: CUP 00.014 Less Than Significant PolenllaIIy WIth Less Than Slgntflcanl M1lIgatIon SlgnlfIcanl No Impact IncorpcraIion Impact Impact IV. BIOLOGICAl. RESOURCES - Would the project: a) Have a substantial edverse Impact, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any specles Identified as a candidate, senslllve, or special status species In local or regional plans, policlas, or regulations, or by the California Department of FISh and Game or U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service? [ I [ I [I [XI b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community Identified In local or regional plans, policies, and regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service? [ I [ I [I [XI c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (Including, but not limited to, marsh, vemal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological Interruptlon, or other means? [ I [ I [) [XI d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species, or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or Impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? [ I [ I [I [XI e) Conflict with any local policles or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? [ I [ I [) [XI f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Conservatlon Community Plan, or other approved local, regional or state habitat conservation plan? [I [I [I [XI The project Is for commercial uses In a fully developed commercial area and will not have any of the above Impacts. V. CULTURAL RESOURCES - Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change In the significance of a . historical resource asdefined in Section 15064.5? [ I [ ]. [I [XI b) Cause a substantial adverse change In the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5?' [I [J [I [XI c) Directly or Indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource o'r site or unique geologic feature? [ I [I [I [XI d) Disturb any human remains, Including those Interred outside offormal,cemeteries?' [ I [ I [I [XI The project Is for commercial uses In a fully developed commercial area and will not have any of the above Impacts. VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS -Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substa'ntlal adverse effects, InclUding the. risk of loss, Injury, or death involving: I) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Ellrthquake Fault Zoning Map Issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? (Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Speclel Publication 42). II) Strong seismic ground shaking? [ I [ I [ I [ I [ I [ I [XI [XI Form "J" CECA ChecIcIIsl 4199 ~ III) Seismlc-relateil grollnd failure, including liquefaction? Iv) Landslides . b) Result In substantial soli erosion or the loss oftopsoll? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that Is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the proJect, and potentially result In on. or off.site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soli, as defined In Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994) creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have solis Incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater c!lsposel systems where sewers are not available for the dlsposel of wastewater? [ ) [ ) [J [XI The proJect Is for commercial uses In a fully developed commercial area. The subject location has not been determined to be especially susceptible to any of the above geOlogic problems and Is not within a Seismic Hazard Area Identified by the Seismic Hazard Mapping Act. The proJect will not necessitate extensive excavation, grading or filling. No unique geologic features have been identified at the site. The proJect 1$ connected to the local sewer system. The proJect will not have any of the above impacts. . File No.: CUP 00.014 Less Than Slgnlrocant Potentially WIth Less Than SlgnlfIcanl MItIgalIon SlgnlfIcanl Impact l.oCOlponlllon Impact [ I [ I [XI [ I [ ) [ I [ ] [ I [ I No Impact [ I [XI [XI [ I [ I [ I [XI [ I [ I [ I [XI VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS - Would the proJect: a) Create a significant hazard to the publiC or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materialS? [ I [ I [I [XI b) Create a significant hazard to the publiC or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials Into the environment? ( I [ I I) [X] c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous . materials, substances, or waste within one- quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? [ I [ I (I [X] d) Be located on a site which Is ,inCluded on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Govemment Code Section 65962.5 and, as e result, would It create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? [ I ( I [I [XI e) Fora proJect located within an airport land use plan, or where such. a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result In a safety hazard for people residing or wOrking in the project area? [ I [ I [I [XI f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the proJect result in a safety hazard for people residing or WOrking In the project area? [ I [ I [) [XI g) Impair Implementation of, or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? ( I [ I [I [XI h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, Injury, or death Involving wildland fires; Including where Wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are Intermixed with wildlands? [ I [ I [I [XI The proJect Is for commercial uses In a fully developed commercial area and will not have any of the above impacts. . . Form -J- -7- CECA ChecI<IIsl 4199 . VIti. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY - Would the project: a) VIolate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or Interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g.. the production rate of pre-exi,stlng nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage patlem of the site or area, InCluding through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, In a manner which wOuld result In substantial erosion or siltation on. or off.site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattem of the site or area. inCluc;ling through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially Increase the rate or amount of surface runoff In a manner which would result In flooding on or off.slte? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality g) Place housing within a 10o-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other fiood hazard delineation map? h) Place structures within a 10o-year flood hazard area, which would Impede or redirect flood flows? . i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, Injury or death InVOlving flooding, Including flooding as a result ofthe failure of a levee or dam? [ I [ I [I' (X] D Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudfiow? [ I [ I [I [XI The proJect Is for commercial uses in a fully developed commercial area. The project will not violate Regional Water Quality Control Board water quality standards or waste discharge requirements, will not alter absorption rates, drainage patterns, surface runoff, surface water conditions, or ground water conditions. The site Is within the Santa Anita Dam Inundation Area, but.wllI not exPose people to any additional or Increased hazard levels. The proJect will not have any of the above Impacts. . . FIle No.: CUP 00.014 Leas Than SIgnJfIcant PotentIaIty WIth Leos Than SIgnificant Mitigation S1gnJflcanl No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact [ I [ I [ I [XI [ ) [ I [ I [XI [ ) [ I [XI [ I [ I ( I [ ) [XI [ I [ ] [ I [ I [XI [X] [ I ( I [ I [ I [X] [ I [ I [ I [ I [Xl IX. LAND USE & PLANNING - Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? [ I [ I [) [XI b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of aD agency with jurisdiction over the project Oncludlng, but not limited to, the general plan, specific plan, loeal coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? [ I [ I [I [X] c) Conflict, with any. applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? ( I [ I [. I [X] The proJect Is for commercial uses in a fully developed commercial area and will not have any of the above Impacts. Form . J- ~ CECA CIIeckIIsl 4199 . . . File No.: CUP 00.014 Less Than Slgnlflcanl PolentlaUy WIth Less Than S1gnlllCanl Millgatlon S1gnlllcanl No Impact Incorporatlon Impact Impact X. MINERAI. RESOURCES - Would the project: a) Result In the loss of availability of a known minerai resource th.at would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? [) [I [I [XI b) Result In, the loss of availability, of a locally important minerai resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? [ I [ I [I [XI The proJect is.for commercial uses' In a fully developed commercial area and will not have any of the above impaCts.. XI. NOISE - Would the project result In: a) ExP.osure of persons to, or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established In the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? [ ) [ ) [I [XI b) Exposure of persons to, or generation of excessive groundbome vibration or groundbome noise levels? [ I [ I [I [XI C) A substantlal"permanent Increase In ambient noise levels In the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? [I [ I [I [XI d) A substantial temporary or periodic Increase In ambient .nolse levels Iii the proJect Vicinity above levels existing without the proJect? [ I [ I [I [XI e) For a project 10CBted within an airport land use plan, or where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or pUblic use airport, would the proJect expose people residing or working In the project area to excessive noise levels? [ ] [ I [J [XI f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the proJect expose people residing or working In the project area to excessive noise levels? ( I [ I [I [XI The project Is for cOmmerCial uses In a fully developed commercial area and will not have any of the above Impacts. XII. POPULATiON & ROUSING - Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth In an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or Indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other InfrastrUcture)? [ I [ I [ I. [X] b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? [ I [ I [I [XI 0) Displace substantiaL numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? [ I [ I [I [XI The proJect Is for commercial uses In a fully developed commercial area and will not have any of the above Impacts. XIII. PUBUC SERVICES - Would the proJect result In substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered govemmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental Impacts, In order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance Objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? [ I [ ) [I [X] Form '.I' -&- CECA Chocldlst 4199 . . . File No.: CUP 00.014 Less Than Slgnlflcanl Potenlfally WIth Less Than SIgnificant MIUgatlon S1gnJflcant No Impact ~lCOIpoIaIIon Impact Impact b) Police protection? [ I [ I [I [X] c) Schools? [ I [ I [I [XI d) Parks? [I [I [I [XI e) other public facllilies? [ I [ I [I [XI The project Is for commercial uses In a fully developed commercial area and will not have any of the ebove impacts. XIV. RECREATION - Would the proJect: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facllltles such that substantial physical deterioratlol! of the facility would occur or be accelerated? [ I [ I [I [XI b) Does the project Include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? [ I [ I [I [X] The project Is for commercial uses In a fully developed commercial area and will not have any of the above Impacts. XV. TRANSPORTATION I TRAFFtC - Would the project: a) Cause an Increase In traffic which Is substantial in relalion to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (I.e., result In a substanliallncrease In either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? [ I [ I [I [XI b) Exceed, either Individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? [ I [ I [I [XI c) Result In a change in air traffic pBtiems, including either an Increase In traffic levels or a change In localion that results Insubstantial sefety risks? [ I [ I [I [X] d) Substantially Increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., , sharp curves or dangerous Intersections) or Incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? [ I [ I [I [XI e) Result In Inadequate emergency access? [ I [ I [I [XI f) Result in Inadequate parking capacity? ( ) [ I [I [XI g) Conflict wllh adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? [I [ I [I [XI The proJect is for commercial uses in' a fully developed commercial area and will not have any of the above Impacts. . XVI. ,UTIUTIES & SERVICE SYSTEMS - Would the proJect: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? . b) Require or result In the construction qf new water or wastewater .treatment facilities or .expanslon of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result In the construction of new storm water 'drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the ( I [ I [ I [XI [ I [ I [ I [XI F"",,"J" -Il). CECA Checlcllsl 4199 . . File No.: CUP 00.014 . Less Than S1gnlflcanl PolenIfaIly WIth Leos Than Slgnlflcanl Mitigation SIgnIfIcanl Impact Incorporatlon Impact No Impact construction of which could cause significant environmental effacts? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entltle(l1ents needed? e) Result In a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that It has aClequate capacliy to serve the project's projected demand In addition to the providers existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to ac:commodate the project's solid waste dlsposel needs? g) Comply wIth fede~l, state and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? [ I [ I [I (Xl The proJect Is for commercial uses In a fully developed commercial area and will not have any of the above Impacts. ' [ I [ I [ I [XI ( I [ I [ I [XI ( I [ I [ I [XI [ I [ ) [ I [XI XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the proJect have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish'or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self.sustalnlng levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate Important examples of the maJor periods of California history or prehistory? [ ] [ ] [] [XI b) Does the proJect have. Impacts that are Individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable' means that the Incremental effects of a proJect are considerable ,when viewed in connection with the effects of Past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) [ I ( I [I [XI c) Does the proJect have environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, ellher directly or Indirectly? [ I [ I [I [XI The proJect Is for commercial uses In.a fully developed commercial area and will not have any of the above Impacts. XVIII. EARLIER ANAL YSES No earlier analyses, and no additional documents Viere referenced pursuant to the tlerlng, program EIR, or other CEQA processes to analyze the project. F""" 'J" -11- CECA C_1sl 4199 Date Filed: FileNo. I cU P 1000 - Of1 7/.;2.7/d'O . CITY OF .ARCADL4 240 WEST HUNTINGTON DRIVE ARCADIA, CA 91007 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM Generat Information 1. Applicant's Name:_B..w..vJAU KaJl.fz.t ~ DDS A ~. J)erUn.Q ~PO"'~ Address: C n .'~<ff15c> 10 6' Hu~tn.{;)r- sc.u.te.. 0 2. Property Address (Location): ~~~.~~~rL~rsq:Jp~. t>-r;' , i~ ., Assessor's Number: '5773012oQ,? 3. Name, address and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project: HOJ\ft.c. W. ./l(')~ I IDE:' HW'l-lu"lfl-on Dr. ~ ~, ~. ( Ij,;z,,) 441- 44~7 - 4. List and describe any other related pennits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: . eLl'f t1x po.rl.i~ a.nd. R-~ re..f-a& .IJ.4.t.. 5. Zone Classification: Q.e,j> 6. General Plan Designation: l!eml'>\era...i.d Proiect DescriDtion 7. Proposed use of site (project description): J)11.YlhJ f O~.P and. &1fu +-l (lWl.( 8. 7000 !'of' Site size: 9. Square footage per building: fro pouj 10. Number offloors of construction: ~e. L I) . ]1. 12. 13. .. Amount of off-street parking provided: ( ~pllAW'i. Proposed scheduling of project: ~ ~ ~ <!.Lf-f""OX II/<R.l?' ~ ()1) Anticipated incremental development: If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit' sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household sizes expected: NIT IS. . 16. If commercial, indicate the type, i.e. neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading facilities, hours of operation: ~ ~,~ , ~bOl ~ <= 1-- ~ ;;:lIon ~r' I /...Y> l".."A,"i P.A. D.J..~ n'.,f~~ ~r...I1<ti/'o. ~~ : 1.1\-<. 1J\M-1~ ~".D '7 AM -7'f'rv) . If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per. shi~ and loading facilities: AJ/ir 17. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project: IJA- 18. If the project involves a variance, conditional use permit or zoning application, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required: (I, lJf' f-&r.~' kA-..",. cu..d. ~ ~ Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? .eets as necessary). 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. .. Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional YES NO 19. Change in existing features of any hills, or substantial alteratin of ground contours. D €I D ~ D !2l D ~ D ~ D Ia D Uil D Ia D 0 E.I.R. 04/12/00 Page 2 Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas.or publiclands orroads Change in pattern, scale or character of general area of project. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. Change in ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage pattersn. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. Is site on filled land or on any'slopes of 10 percent or more. Use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammable or explosives. e. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. .. YES NO Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.) o Substantial increase in fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oi~ natural gas, etc. o Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. o Storm water system discharges from areas for materials storage, vehicle or equipment fueling. vehicle or equipment maintenance (including washing), waste handling. hazardous materials handling or storage delivery or loading docks, or other outdoor work areas? o A significantlyenviroIll1lentally harmful increase in the flow rate or volume of storm water runoff? o A significantly environmentally harmful increase in erosion of the project site or surrounding areas? o Storm water discharges that would significantly impair the beneficial uses of receiving waters or areas that provide water quality benefit,s (e.g. riparian corridors, wetlands, etc.)? o Harm to the biological integrity of drainage systems and water bodies? o Environmental Seltin!! iia UiI l:ia Ila ~ ~ L8 ~ 36. Describe (on a separate sheet) the project site as it exist,s before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animala,any cultural, historical or scenic aspects, any existing structures on the. site, and the use ofthe structures, Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. . 37. Describe (on a separate sheet) the surrounding properties, including in!ormation on plants, animals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land uses (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set- backs, r.ear yards, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. Certification I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the lIttached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and th8.t the facts, statements, and information presented are true and corr~ to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date . 7/027/ao . &~~ Signature .~~ E.!.R. 04/12/00 Page 3