Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1618
-
.
.
RESOLUTION NO. 1618
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.
00-013 TO OPERATE A 4,362 SQ.FT. RESTAURANT AT 101 W.
HUNTINGTON DRIVE.
WHEREAS, on July 17, 2000,. a Conditional Use Pennit application was filed by
Gary Wang to operate a 4,362 sq.ft. restaurant, Development Services Department Case
No. C.U.P. 00-013, at property commonly known as 101 W. Huntington Drive; and
WHEREAS, A public hearing was held on August 22, 2000, at which time all
interested persons were given full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence.
NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ARCADIA HEREBY RESOL YES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the factual data submitted by the Development Services
Department in the attached report is true and correct.
SECTION 2. This Commission .finds:
1. That the granting of such Conditional Use Permit will not be detrimental to
the public health or welfare, or injurious to the property or improvements in such zone or
vicinity.
2. That the use applied for at the location indicated is a proper use for which a
Conditional Use Permit is authorized.
3. That the site abuts streets and highways adequate in width and pavement type
to carry the kind of traffic generated by the proposed use.
4. That the granting of such Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the
comprehensive General Plan.
5. That the use applied for will not have a substantial adverse impact on the
environment, and that based upon the record as a whole there is no evidence that the
proposed project will have any potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the
habitat upon which the wildlife depends.
SECTION 3. That for the foregoing reasons this Commission grants a
Conditional Use Pennit to operate a 4,362 sq.ft. restaurant, upon the following
conditions:
-
.
.
I. Building Code compliance and conditions of approval must be met to the
complete satisfaction of the Building Section.
2. Fire safety shall be provided to the complete satisfaction of the Fire
Department.
3. Seating shall be limited to a maximum of one hundred and twenty (120)
people.
4. The red metal roof shall be re-painted to an earth tone color subject to the
review and approval of the Development Services Department.
5. A landscaping plan shall be submitted to the Development Services
Department for review and approval prior to issuance of a building permit.
6. The parking lot shall be re-surfaced and the parking stalls shall be re-stripped
in accordance with Section 9269.1. of the Arcadia Municipal Code.
7. The driveway entry on Huntington Drive shall be re-paved with stamp
concrete.
8. The light ftxtures in the parking lot shall be re-painted.
9. The plywood overhang shall be stucco to continue the stucco treatment around
the entire building.
10. Noncompliance with the provisions and conditions of this conditional use
permit shall constitute grounds for its immediate suspension or revocation.
SECTION 4. The Secretary shall certifY to the adoption of this Resolutio~ and
shall cause a copy to be forwarded to the City Council of the City of Arcadia.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the forgoing Resolution was adopted at a regular
meeting of the Planning Commission held on August 22, 2000, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Commissioners Kalemkiarian, Murphy, and Sleeter
None
Commissioners Bruckner and Huang
None
d~
Chairman, Planning Commission
City of Arcadia
,
.
.
APPROVED AS TO FQRM:
~r.~
Stephen P. Deitsch, City Attorney
STAFF REPORT
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
August22,2000
TO: Arcadia City Planning Commission
FROM: Donna Butler, Community Development Administrator
By: Kenneth Phung, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit No. 00-013
SUMMARY
.
This Conditional Use Permit (C.U.P.) application was submitted by Gary Wang to
operate a 4.362 sq.ft. restaurant with seating for 120 patrons located at 101 W.
Huntington Drive. The Development Services Department is recommending approval
of C.U.P. 00-013 and adoption of Resolution #1618 granting the conditional use
permit subject to the conditions in this staff report. In addition the Planning
Commission is being requested to consider the ,architectural design review of a
proposed pole sign and wall signs.
GENERAL INFORMATION
APPLICANT: Gary Wang (architect)
"
LOCATION: 101 W. Huntington Dr.
REQUEST: A Conditional Use Permit to operate a 4,362 sq.ft. restaurant with
seating for 120 patrons.
SITE AREA: 48,594 sq.ft. (.90 acres)
FRONTAGES; 86 Feet on Huntington Drive
323 Feeton Santa Clara Street
EXISTING LAND USE & ZONING:
The site is developed with a vacant building; zoned C-2
.
.
.
.
SURROUNDING LAND USES & ZONING:
North: Single-family residential; zoned R-1.
South: "100 to one" Club/restaurant and karoke bar; zoned C-2.
East: Vacant Auto Dealership; zoned C-2.
West: Office building; zoned C-2.
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION:
The site is designated as Commercial.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
The subject site was granted a C.U.P. in 1976 (CUP 76-026) for the construction of a
restaurant (Sambo's) and sincethat-time a restaurant has operated at this site.
The most recent restaurant to operate at this location was Angel's Diner, which was a
theme restaurant reminiscent of the 1950's that opened in June of 1994 and closed
on December 31, 1995. The property has been vacant since that time.
When the diner's owner, Vicorp Restaurants Inc., proposed to open their restaurant
thely were required to obtain Redevelopment Agency (a.k.a "Agency") approval.
Vicorp worked with the Agency to obtain approval for their design concepts to have
neon lighting against polished stainless steel, tiled surfaces, glass block entry
columns, etched glass windows and a red metal roof. City staff agreed with the
overall design concepts, except for the red metal roof. Staff's concern with the color
was the prominent location of the site (Santa Clara and Huntington), the location of
the building on the property (near the street' with little setback) and the fact that there
were no red metal roofs in the p~oject area. Vicorp considered the red roof an
important element of the corporate image, which they wanted to establish for their
restaurant chain. Although City ~aff did not support the red roof, the Arcadia
Redevelopment Agency approved the existing building design on May 3,1994.
PROPOSAL & ANALYSIS
The applicant's proposal is to operate a 4,362 sq.ft. buffet-type restaurant with
seating for 120 patrons located at 101 W. Huntington Drive, as shown on the
submitted site plan. The restaurant will be open 7 days a week from 10:00 a.m. to
11 :00 p.m. In addition the Planning Commission is being requested to consider the
architectural design review of a proposed pole sign and wall signs.
The restaurant will not create any potential parking or traffic impacts upon the site,
and the parking spaces provided exceed the City's parking requirements. Forty-four
(44) parking spaces are required for the restaurant; sixty-seven (67) parking spaces
are provided as shown on the plan.
CUP 00-013
August 22. 2000
Page 2
.
.
.
The site has been vacant for over five (5) years since Angel's Diner closed, and since
that time the site has deteriorated. The colors of the red metal roof and exterior
stucco wall's have faded. The landscaping with trees, shrubbery, and flowers have
not been maintained. The parking lot surface is cracking and showing signs of
disrepair.
The restaurant proposal calls for improvement to the site that will consist of painting
the lighting fixtures in the parking lot and the trash enclosure. The plan also includes
the installation of a 7'-0" high by 12'-0" wide double face cabinet sign on an existing
18'-0" high pole, which will be covered by a rectangular sleeve painted to match the
building with an overall height of 25'.0" high. Two channel letter wall signs (Great
Wall Buffet) are proposed on the south and east elevation of the building with two
color neon tubes (red and blue) along the entire length of the top edge of the fascia.
The Development Services staff recommends a monument sign as an alternative to
the proposed pole sign for the "Great Wall Super Buffet", The Redevelopment
Agency as well as the Development Services Department has been encouraging
monument signs both in the Redevelopment Project Area as well as throughout the
City. The monument sign should incorporate in its design the building's materials
and colors to make it compatible with the building's architecture. The final design
shall be subject to the review and approval of the Community Development
Administrator. In addition staff is recommending removal of the neon color tubes.
The neon tubes are inconsistent with the characteristics of the area, and out-of-
character with the design elements of the building.
Reopening the restaurant will be a positive improvement to the site and will enhance
the neighborhood and the surrounding prop~rties.
Although the applicant has proposed improvements to the site, the following items
were not addressed by the applicanf'and should be completed prior to the opening of
the new restaurant:
1. Repaving and re-striping of the parking lot;
2. Clean-up all planter areas and replant where necessary;
3. Repaint the building roof and trim earth-tone colors to be approved by the
Community Development Administrator;
In regards to the red roof, its is staff's opinion that it should be repainted to an earth-
tone color to be consistent with other roof colors in the Redevelopment Project Area.
The red roof is no longer a critical part of the design concept, as with the image
Vicorp wanted to establish for their Angel's restaurant chain.
CUP 00-013
August 22, 2000
Page 3
.
.
.
The applicant shall be required to comply with all code requirements as determined
necessary by the Building Official, Fire Marshall, Public Works Director and
Community Development Administrator.
CEQA
Pursuant to the provisions of the Califomia Environmental Quality Act, the
Development Services Department has prepared an initial study for the proposed
project. Said initial study did not disclose any substantial or potentially substantial
adverse change in any of the physical conditions within the area affected by the
project including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, ambient noise and objects of
historical or aesthetic significance. When considering the record as a whole, there is
no evidence that the proposed project will have any potential for adverse effect on '
wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Therefore, a
Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project.
RECOMMENDATION
The Development Services Department recommends approval of Conditional Use
Permit No. CUP 00-013 subject to the following conditions:
1. Seating shall be limited to a maximum of 120 persons.
2. The red metal roof shall be re-painted an earth tone color subject to the review
approval of the Community Development Administrator.
3. Staff recommends a monument sign in lieu of the proposed pole sign as
submitted by the applicant. Said siqn shall be submitted to the Community
Development Administrator for review and approval.
4. A landscaping plan shall be' submitted to the Community Development
Administrator for review and ap\lroval prior to issuance of a building permit.
5. The parking lot shall be re-surfaced and the parking stalls shall be re-striped in
accordance with Section 9269.1. of the Arcadia Municipal Code.
6. The driveway entry on Huntington Drive shall be repaved with stamped
concrete.
7. The light fixtures.!n the parking lot shall re-painted.
8. The plywood overhang shall be stucco to continue the stucco treatment around
the entire building.
9. Repaint the building and trim with colors approved by the Community
Development Administrator.
10. Approval of CUP 00-013 shall not take effect until the property owner and
applicant have executed and filed the Acceptance Form available from the
Development Services Department to indicate acceptance of the conditions of
approval.
CUP 00-013
August 22, 2000
Page 4
.
.
.
11. All conditions of approval shall be complied with prior to completion of the tenant
improvements, and opening of the restaurant. Noncompliance with the plans,
provisions and conditions of CUP 00-013 shall be grounds for immediate
suspension or revocation of any approvals that could result in the closing of the
restaurant.
FINDINGS AND MOTIONS
Approval
The Planning Commission should move to approve the Negative Declaration
and adopt Resolution No. 1618: A Resolution of the Planning Commission of
the City of Arcadia, California, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 00-013 for a
4,362 sq. ft. restaurant at 101 W. Huntington Drive.
Denial
If the Planning Commission intends to deny this Conditional Use Permit application,
the Commission should move for denial and direct staff to prepare a resolution which
incorporates the Commission's decision and specific findings.
If any Planning Commissioner, or other interested party nas any questions or
comments regarding this matter prior to the August 2200 public hearing, please
contact Assistant Planner, Kenneth Phung at (626) 574-5447.
.
Attachments: Land Use and Zoning Map
Site plan and floor plan
Pole Sign and Wall Elevations
'Resolution 1618
Negative Declaration & Initial Study
CUP 00-013
August 22. 2000
Page 5
'/.
('''''4)
7/::
.
:J b o' ~
(14'/) .
"
I/d'7) (/ _(l~z.) lI"") (tIt)
0 0 0 0 0
I:l
~.
If-I R-I
C4
~ ~~
~ V~
. ;c::( C-2 ~
~. '1~ . ,,~
~
~CANT ~
C-2 ~ '0. .C'-2 .0
V)
lit//VTINGTON
/00-1/.
CJ.jJf3 .
'.
/
DIfIVE
.,
I
. PARk
.' S2
LAND USE & ZONING MAP
101 W. Huntington Drive t NORTH
CUP 00-013 1 inch = 100 feet
.
.
~-
-:;.::-
SEGTION A-A'
~rI
(i):v;--~-- -"---
LEGEND:
""
_-.&. _cn""_~"'.'ll'
E.sr.--.l'O_
~"""""''''IIl!__
.~-
HO'1'e., __.._________....._
~.__.__..._--
.....-......._-_..-....'--~-~_.,
..-..l-e__-"______
.
.
.~
I
I
~ ~ I!
<::!i .
~8P
~~~ II
tII iii i
1N1a!
=~
I
"11e!g.
i ~r
'i.
- ::i! -" I
" 3' i~'
: !C t~
~ w 1,/.
i ~ 9.,
~
~
"
lED-::;1.
o
1~1f.lIU
D
...------
------
..-.-...-
::=EJl
.H..n'lT
~~
Proposed Floor Plan
.e~.."
I'~~-~"I
.
YMBOLS
A'<"'::, -..
~swm
~--
,..,r'. -
~O(T"'L
MU --..
~. --
I _ IHTERIOIl HEVATION
'~MU__
~~U~_,.... inww;~
+m..
DATuN fl [V"nON
""
~.
all. ROONHln.IBfR8N..",r
@ .illlllli.
@ EOUlPt,lFnl NUM8~
GENERAL NOTES
~=:==--:::..:=::-'...:::-..:.:. "=.-"..:.:...~
---.-.--------
-
-,. ...-.....--...-.-..--,-
-...............-..--..-
1...__.........__.._.._...._ ....
c-...._......_..__.__ _...
-....- ..._.....-..~_.._............-,
-...--...........-.-..--..
~-.......__...-
.. -...-......-....-.......-..-..-
-
.. __...._.00..__ _._...
..,.-.......-.._.._..__..._ 0......
-..--....-.........--..--......
-
'" -....-.-......-......-..-...-.
--.....-
T,........_._........_____ ...~....
-_..._.fIIo~...._.._....._....
----....--.....-....--.....-
-....__ '.c____..__
....-.---...-..--..-
.. 100"'-'_.'-,..._0.-..........._..
----.....--.... .-.....-......
..._~.._-..._o.-._..._.
--....-..,- ...---..-.-
.._~....._.._-_...._.,..
-'..-- ...--..------...
_....._.....__.._l>o..~..._~
--...-....-..-
.. 11o.o..___..._____.._,.
-....,--......-......---.......-
10. ~_................_..,.__.__
---.-
.1!"___..._...__..__,....
____w_..._~_...__...
-..--
If- lOt'--_......._._....___.._
-....----......-....-..----...-...
-..-..--.-...,..-..-.-
--...--.--
q .--------.-,-
- .---...-..--.--
-..-.---
.. ,..~..._..._-......._...._._~-
_.._-....__..__...._-~
----..---...---..--...
-........-----
$- ...--...~_..-..-'-_.
------_.._...----~
----..-
. _.._~-_.._--_..-
....-.....-..----..-..- ......
-.........-.-..-..--..--
--
.
G~[EA 1 WAll ~Uff[El
101 ~. HUNTINTON DR.., AR.CADIA, CA "IIOOb
DlSAIll.J: ACCESS NOTES A B BilE V I A T IONS ADD I T ION A L NOT E
-
,._____~n_r:__....._._.._
'--
"",----
L..._...,,"'..__.._..__..__..._.....
--------------
-..-....-.....-,......---
r,'l.._.....___..__........'-_... '_"""'_'"
_~..._J..__..__..__..........__.._
-.......-...--........
ll____................._...__
..-__-Iot__._w.....___....
--.-.......-....--..--.-........
---..-.... ..._.......).. ....._.... '''_00"
....---.----..-.....-....-
__.....__..lIr ___..._..,..._.
--.....
......--.....-.
""- -.....---..-...-....--
..- ...,--_...-.....~- ...-.....
-"'-'''.-''--'"- ..-.--...---.-..
....._.._u_.._.__..__.._....Ml_
------~
1.....____.-...-"'--.-..-
-.,.....-.11".....--001...__,.....-- _.
~~~":::' ':""'';:''':...'''''J.':''':'::' ":::.::':"-=:.c..':.""':...
=:"..'":'.::.-::"..:..If;::,....---...- --..
-
L.._._.~.._.__.._'I"...r___..
_-....__..___..._._IIl'...~_
..~
lb._____.._.....__.__.__
_r~.....
-"'~
~r.__"'_."'__""'__,f__.
--.---.-""".....-....--..-..
-----..--....-.--.............
--..--.-- .........--..........--
-...--.-
. .__..w......,_...._._..._.._
- ..-----..-----..-
---,..--...-----
__1&'._..w_ ______"'.........
w_
i- ___._...._.._1-100
_I_'''~
~:: ',:-':"'-:::':' :-..:.:::. =':':~-:'=.-=. ~.=. "1.
__........:.._..._11>.___.:...
-,_.,.~
'. "_'_"'_"__"__"__~''''fO
-..--...--..-- ....---.-..-
...-!'......-.-...... .
r_ __..__..,,_.........._..._ "'__"
..._......._rr.:fo<".
I- .___.__.____*""'_
-.....-.-.
'. --...-..-.-.-....--,-.-.1-.
___ 101_......___"'.____.
--,-...,
I __...~...__.._..__
~- .-...----..------..-....
--.-.....- -...---..-.....
--....--..--..--..... ...--..-
--...._-,-
~ ...-------..-.-- --..
--.-----
. ,--...---..------.-
---..."'*"'".....- ,..,....-.---....
:,-"'::'l.r=.::.~-:.::. "::..":.-=-.._ ~-=;:.
-.-
~":.':.. ....-:.":"..."':;~.:.:::::.::.-.':".:::t:' ::'..:.:
:::'~ ':::'-:':-::-":'::'::7.~... -:.-: :.;:'-::;~..
.. .--...--............-----..---..
,~.
.. .-..............--.--..-.....-...-
""'*---
, ,..-..---....--..-...-.-...-
, ,..-....,.,...---.--....-....--
::.::;~ ~ ..":'f.:'':;::-::::'' "r:."":' '::'t--:-:.=.
-
it. ....._...._____.._..__..._~..
-........-....-.-
~-=.-==.:.-==::.::::.:."'::o=':.=
"-C. _t'C~_
"". _o(,~~......
"f 1UUt1':'T1U 11I11-
_ -.sr...,Or IlIlit.
."
I::
--
--
......., ~-.E
u ClI.>o.'_ ot.
I:U'. a:wt:.ol OJ).
a... ~r(.v(oIl ouuro _
~, iJIQl('llT _.
a.-. t(~
Q._ Q."WlllCIlI I'L.
g;. t:L(A/I "nr'lt
tw ~.._-.tl...
~ ~l!
u. tt_''I.t "'0-
u.
~,
-,
U. ,1.1
. .
-
T.D.
L,'
..
"
"
,..
...
v,e.I.
Yllrf'
"".
~ .,-
." "'..
~ _'ll.
" tOOS1""
,~ I.,)..
" IlI!..rlOl<
hlV C~&I".f1rV_'GII
L.. tlt"......"."n
.. ,-
.. ,--
... r"'lt'lOSlItoIMIl
.. _$><,.....WO
.. .-
'.. '.,.
'" ....
~. MV....~O
,....11I .--
-, -..
" ~-
'. "'_CIlIW1lll
.. "'-"'101<
PROJECT
"""""
WDlllU.IluI'lfl
."_,""IClIIIIIlI.
-,,-
D!:$l_~
~__I.SS_IU
",..;OOIur:. oo.us... 1081 (
_.tIltt,,"*-C__
1faI'......r..-.aa...7J1
-
"L
"
-
-
-.-
"".
~
fOIl''''_TlI~l
-."
M"'''
ClOI'SIOffIL'WIl;Il
-
-.
~,
.....
~
..-.
_.w
....
....
SI-"\ SUA
.......
~I....
.~.
1lIIl".....''-
,--
.1II_.1G_
1.1Ii1_~
..-
.-.tlJogm_
.....~liOIIlll
-,~
.I'$I-.!
:-;0
."
.-
--
TEAM
~"""C."'-L I ~I a.~TlQGAl.I ~l
c.....-____IlS
511..ltO'f(lllfl'4'IIll......'t
_TEll(.""",u..n.4
<UlIHII._'_lIZtJ'....nr
P'RO.JEGT ADDRESS
411_"",I.-C..
.ulUOI.O.u_.
PROJECT SUMMARY
L~6A1. "1!5G~11"'t10N
...
~..EGT Df$G~PTION
It...l_trtIII'oot.....51aft11111111...P!$1..cSOCU'
~C:'*'NA!..'\"Sf$
GQ:C;:le ,,,,Il;t:t.~"fI\lDt.
_~_ot14<IK.
GQN!)TClUc.TION T'YI'"e '''t ~..
~MG"', ...\.'
TOT.o.t. ....~s, 'JU wr
nR( [)[P4RTM[NT N.OTES:
'~':""'f.~""QjQ.;'';ll.:'.2Ao':lm:::':=--=
---
.----...-....-..-....-......-
..-....-..-..--...-..
.,-...-......--...--...-..........
1;:,,---.....- -~_._.....-
...._---~._..'"'...._-
....._--~........_-
.~"""--..__......'.._.....-
.---.-....-..---
.::1.-~ml;::n::l"::.:r.rc=....r=--.....
... =:::a;:.o: c.-:trVOO...:;i'C-::!.::=-....... -..-
a_.......,;"".-..__,
____.._.v_
..:::.-==..-......---.......----
..---........-.--
..-..-...--........
.-.......---. ----..---
...-.-..........--....--.--
--...........- ---..-..-.
....-..----......--.....--
..:::::=--"::::'::'- ---
--...-.----....-.---
-............--......------..
.....-..-....--/
___..._100___
......---.-.......,-.....---
.....-...-......-...--..-....--.
.....-..
GENERAL NOTES:
~-=---...--._-.._--
.......---........---.......-
li=-":;.~==-=-::...------
:.:::n:.~e.~"I:':.:.-==".:.::t""""'..
. ~-=:.'::.~-':1.'=--...-...!:::'J:::....r_-::
a ~ ..r~<:..=.~oo:::.::::..:"---
. =-'-:::'::0:.::::"-::::::"'-"-
SIT E
PLAN
.
SHEET INDEX
., .........
.., I'IIO'OIUI"''''_
.., r~m:.~IIf8.C~
,., NtTlIUl.......... .....
..~~
R.....'ts.c!Dle.Mll1...H1t
...;.u.....
.., _It__.....
., ...........,""'"~.....
ADDITIONAL NOTE
HEALTH DEPT. NOrES:
. :..==:"''''-:.=--------
.--..---------
.....-- --..-..--
............-------
.::::---,.....--.....-... .---
.=.."="...,...-..-----.-
.---..----....-
. ~..::.~r.:=..."='.:=.=..'=-
. :::-:.:.=.:.....--::'==:.~~---
. =:::::-.::.___..__._oco_
':"~~~~:='':,:;--
l
"
I
Ii i
1 J
i
I
I
~
i
I
~~d
>8P
lI:QlI) II
(!j~~ I
_*-1
IMII!
! ~~
i 0-
g ....
. ~.
~ ~ H
~ ilo-o: X.(
~ i\ II
f -:(
DAfBDfUoWlil
-....-
..
k'
1"- I
D
I=~I
;}
.'/
.fm -..-
,~,._,~, ~ @o~
---- .
-;0=.':010
.'
".
.
12'-0"
]'-0"
.
-
"1
~-,..
.,
f n mil
Propfl'll'd S gJI e
I thee cabiDc:t pole
Fabrication of one daub e
~isn(J' xU' ~ 16" deep)... _
, .-"':":'~-lastK:f~~"'1'}I'':t.l
.BIG.3l16...White.Jexan,p .\':'
.2- ". and clw8ctcn are red and green
u1Ilt:t1~.,~.,_ _,
<!nyt ..
3'-~.~~WiUbcco~a::lot~:ions
t..,. painted tDIII1ttcb.
s -.. 18' _... _._.
whIcbllfltJ2..I..,___
:.i
"
r",,,:-::
::'05'
I.
;-." .~,
:,(
.,-t ,f'!
;~".:;:'~;,.~:~ ~;i~~:?:~-'
'J',,-~:,t', ~f. 1:1,"., e
.'~,;Jf:~:~-' {;:;';(.'; .:: '\;'" ',",.;
^. .~. ~ \-~o- '".1"~~1
,:,'::':'~,~~_ -......:~;'s.
t
~
""
~
...
....
!.!
'-I
.
~
~~
-.
.)~.l\~
JOBADD '101 HWldngtonDf066
CITY -of :' ARCAOtACA:?1
28K SIGNS ~u&c:tunns Co.
1406 V'uglnia Ave /I ]
City afBaldWin"{)llrlc CA 91706
Phone: 626 - 814-.8889
fax: 626.814-.8&90
.
I.
80~.
.1
.
S.u
...~
-1--
. ~- '~'':: ..'~~. ~'~-r'~, ~-~~,l;;:t'-:;-,;-'.:
.
~
~
~.. . .::. ~'.:..
RED
-I
'., '. G.' .' R"'" E.~"It; Y' W.... 'A'. LL' Bt'. U.'~ f~'" F':' [C,.."....y."" ~.
~.. .:', .' ., . ., ,'""\'.' ,"" ;,C;:,: ~
-' - _ '" "':. . "<-"~, > - ", -',:~ ~ - -, - .. -;.~
_ ,_, J ,.... . . _ ' .., ,- .. ~
~
22~on
RED
Two color NEON tubes
BLVD
.,.,'
"
.; ',- .
. ;:
~
120~O"
.1
I
.
.
.
File No.: CUP 00-013
CITY OF ARCADIA
240 WEST HUNTINGTON DRIVE
ARCADIA, CA 91007
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
A.dopted: .. 0 R A. F T --
Title and Description of Project:
Conditional Use Permit CUP 00-013: A conditional use permit to operate a 4,362 sq.ft.
restaurant with seating for 120 patrons from 10:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m., seven (7) days a week.
Location of Project:
101 W. Huntington Dr.
Arcadia, CA 91007
Name of Applicant or ProJect Sponsor:
Applicant: Gary Wang
573 Monterey Pass Rd.
Monterey Park,CA 91754
Contact:
Same
(626) 288-6898
FindIng:
The Planning Commission, having reviewed the Initial Study of this proposed project and
having reviewed the written comments received prior to the pUblic hearing of the Planning
Commission, including the recommendation of the City's staff, does hereby find and declare
that the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment based on the
consistency of the proposed project with the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance and
.the inclusion of the following mitigation measUre:
. The square footage of the restaurant shall be a maximum of 4,'362sq.ft. and the seating
shall be limited to a maximum otone.hundred and twenty (120) people.
"
The Planning Commission hereby finds that this Negative Declaration reflects its independent
judgment. A copy of the lriitial Study may be obtained at the location listed below. The
location and custodian of the documents and any other material which constitute the record of
proceedings upon which the City based its decision to adopt this Negative Declaration are as
follows:
City of Arcadia
Development Services DeptJCommunity Development Division/Planning Services
240 West Huntington Drive
Arcadia, CA 91007
Staff member: Kenneth Phung, Assistant Planner (626) 574-5447
Date Received for Filing:
.
.
.
(i)
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
I. ProJect Title:
Conditional Use Permit No. 00-013
2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Arcadia
Development Services Department
Community Development Division / Planning Services
240 W. Huntington Drive
P.O. Box 60021
Arcadia, CA 91066-6021
3. Contact PersoD and Phone,Number:
Kenneth.Phung (626)574,5447
4. ProJect Location: 101 W. Huntington Drive
5. Project SpoDsor's Name aDd Address: Gary Wang
573 Monterey Pas Rd.
Monterey Park, CA91754
(626) 288-6898
6. General Plan Designation:
Commercial
7. ZODIDg: C-2
8. Description of proJect: (Describe the whole action involved, Including but not limited to later
phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off-site features Decessary for its
implemeDtatioD. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary.):
A Conditional Use Permit for a 4,362 sq;ft. restaurant 'at 101 W. Huntington Drive, with seating for 120
patrons, operating from 10:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.I}l., 7 days a week.
9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: @rlefly describe the proJect's surroundings.)
I.
North:
South:
East:
West:
Single-family residential; zoned R-l
"100 to one" Club/ restauranIand karoke bar; zoned C-2
Folger Ford site with vacant building; zoned C-2
Office building; zoned C-2
10. Other publie agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or
participation agreement):
City Engineering Division / City Maintenance Department / City Water Division / Los Angeles
County Engineer
CEQAFORMS/CHECKLIST
08/09/00
Page 1 of4
.
.
.
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least
one impact that isa "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
Aesthetics
Agriculture Resources
Air Quality
Biological Resources
Cultural Resources
Geology / Soils
- Hazards & Hazardous
Materials
Hydrology / Water Quality
- Land Use / Planning
Noise
Population / Housing
- Mineral Resources
Recreation
- Transportation / Traffic
Public Services
- Utilities / Service Systems
Mandatory Findings of
Significance
DETERMINATION (To be completed by the Lead Agency):
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
- I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant'effect on the environment, and a
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will
not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to
by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a signi~cant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
- I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant or ''potentially significant unless
mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect I) has been adequately analyzed in an
earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation
measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. AnENVIRONMENT AL
IMP ACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because
all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant
to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that
are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.
~~
Signature
Kenneth Phung
Printed Name
7/27/2000
Date
CITY OF ARCADIA
For
CITYnK\fPtnB/20002000/546265
FORM
"J"
Page 2 of 4
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
. I) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are
adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following
each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information
sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the
project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is
based on project"specific factors as well as general standards (e,g. the project will not expose
sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis).
2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site,as well as on-
site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as.direct, and construction as well as
operational impacts.
3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impactmay occur, then the
checklist answers must indicate, whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant
with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate ifthere is
substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are ,one or. more "Potentially Significant
Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required.
4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where
the incorporation of mitigation measures .has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant
Impact" to a "Less than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation
measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level
(mitigation measures from Section XVIT, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross-referenced).
.
5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA
process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section
lS063(c)(3)(I?). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following:
a) Earlier Analyses Used. Identify and state where they are available for review.
b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were
within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuantto applicable
legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based
on the earlier analysis.
c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation
Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation.measures which were. incorporated or refined
from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the
project.
6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information
sources. for potential impacts (e.g. general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously
prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages
where the statement is substantiated.
.
CITY/RVPUB/2000/313785 FORM "Y'
Page3 of 4
.
.
.
7) Supporting Information Sources. A source list should be attached, and other sources used or
individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion.
8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however,
lead agencies should normally address the questions form this'checklist that are, relevant to a
project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected.
9) The explanation of each issue should identify:
a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and
b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance.
I,
CITY/RVPUB/2000/313785 FORM "r'
Page 4 of 4
.
.
.
Issues:
I. AESTHETICS. Would the project:
a) Have,a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but
not limited to, tress, rock outcroppings, and historic
buildings within a state scemc highway?
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or
quality of the site and its surroundings?
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which
would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
The proposed restaurant will be in an existing
commercial bUildiDg, any exterior improvements will
be required to comply with local architectural
standards and lIIumlnatloD limits and will not result in
any ofthe above'impacts.
.
II. AGRICUL TURERESOURCES. In. determining
whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant
environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the
California Agricultural Land Evaluation andSite
Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California
Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use'in
assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the
project:
a)Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or
Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown
on the maps prepllTed purSuant to the Farmland Mapping
and Monitoring 'Program of the California Resources
Agency, to non-agricultural use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a
Williamson Act contract?
CITY nt \'PUBI20002000/546265
1
PotentialIy
Significant
Impact
File No: CUP 00-013
Less Than
Significant
Wilb Less Than
Mitigation Significant No Impsct
IncQIporaled fmpact
x
x
x
x
x
x
FORM"J"
Issues:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
File No: CUP 00-013
Less Than .
Significant
With Less Than
Mitigation Significant No Impact
Incol]lorated Impact
.
c) Involve other changes in the existing environment
which, due to their location or nature, could result in
conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use?
x
The proposalls consistent with the commercial
designation In the General Plan and with the C-2
zoning of the site, and is required to comply with the
regulations any other jnrlsdictional agency with
applicable environmental regulations. The proposal is
for a commercial use, which is consistent with the
surrounding development.
m. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance
criteria established by the applicable air quality
management or air pollution control district may be relied
upon to make the following determinations. Would the
project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the - X
. applicable air quality plan?
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute
- X
substantially to an existing or projected air quality
violation?
X
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of
any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-
attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient,air
quality standard (including releasing emissions which
exceed quantitative thresholds.for ozone precursors)?
- - X
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations?
.
CITY IR VPUBI20002000/546265
FORM "J"
2
.
.
.
Issues:
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial
number of people?
The proposed restaurant and its operation will be
subject to local air qnality regulations as administer,ed
by the South Coast Air Quality Management.District
which should prevent any impacts relative to items (a)
and/or (b) above. There are no exterior improvements
proposed that wonld result in alterations to air
movement, moisture or temperature, or cause a
change in climate. No objectionable odors have been
associated with the proposed use.
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or
through habitat modifications, on any species identified as
a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or
region;U plans, policies, or regulations, or by the
California Department ofFish and Game or U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service?
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian
habitat or other sensitive natural community identifi~d in
local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the
California Department ofFish and Game or U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service?
I,
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally
protected wetlands as defined by 'Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act (including, but notlimited to, marsh, vernal
pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling,
hydrological interruption, or other means?
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any
native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or
with established native resident or migratory wildlife
corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery
sites?
CITY IR VPUB/20002000/546265
3
Potentially
Significant
Impact
-
File No: CUP 00-013
Less Than
Significant
With Less Than
Mitigation Significant No Impact
Incorporated Impact
x
-
x
x
-
x
x
FORM"]"
.
.
.
Issues:
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances
protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation
policy or ordinance?
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat
conservation plan?
The proposed restaurant will be located In an existing
commercial building in a commercial area. None of
the above circumstances,exist.
V. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse.change in the significance
of a historical resource as defined in ~ 15064.5?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance
of an archaeological resource pursuant to ~ 15064.5?
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological
resource or site or unique geologic feature?
,
d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred
outside of formal cemeteries?
The proposed use will be in an existing commercial
building. None of the above resonrces have been
identified at the subject area, and none of the impacts
have been associated with the proposed,nse.
VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS -- Would the project:
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial
adverse effects, including the risk ofloss, injury or death
involving:
CI11rnt'fPtnB/20002000/546265
4
Potentially
Significant
Impact
-
-
File No: CUP 00-013
Less Than
Significsnl
With Less Than
Mitigation Significant No Impacl
Incol]lorated Impact
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
FORM "J"
.
.
.
Issues:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on
the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning
Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on
other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to
Division of Mines and GeOlogy Special Publication 42.
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including
liquefaction?
iiii) Landslides?
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or
that would become unstable as a result of the project, and
potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral
spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defmed in Table 18-1-
B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating
substantial risks to life or property?
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the.use
of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems
where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste
water?
While this entire region is subject to the effects of
seismic activity, the snhject location has not been
determined to be especially susceptible to any of the
above geological or soil problems.
VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS.
Would the project:
crrY/R\rPtnB/20002000/546265
5
Potentially
Significant
Impact
-
File No: CUP 00-013
Less Than
Significant
With Less Thsn
Mitigation Significanl No Impacl
Iocorporated Impact
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
FORM "J"
.
.
.
Issues:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine transport, use, or
disposal of hazardous materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset. and
accident conditions involving the release of hazardous
materials into the environment?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or
acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within
one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code section 65962.5 and, as a result, would
it create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not been adopted; within two ]piles
of a public airport or public use airport, would the project
result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in
the project area?
t.
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,
would the proj ect result in a safety hazard for people
residing or working in the project area?
g) Impair implementation. of or physically .interfere with
an adopted emergency response plan ,or emergency
evacuation plan?
CITY /R VPUB120002000/546265
6
Potentially
Significant
Impact
-
File No: CUP 00-013
Less Than
Significant
With Less Than
Mitigation Significant No Impact
Incorporated impact
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
FORM "J"
.
.
.
Issues:
h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of
loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including
where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where
residences are intermixed with wildlands?
The City Building Services and the City Fire
Department will review the plans for the restanrant to
prevent any of the above impacts. No existing sources
of potential health hazards have been Identified at the
subject property.
VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY.
Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge
requirements?
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere
substantially with groundwater recharge such that there
would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of
the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate
of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which
would not support existing land uses or planned uses for
which permits have been granted)?
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pa,tteni of the
site or area, including through the alteration of the course
of a stream or river, in a manner which woulll result in
substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site?
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the
site or area, including through the alteration of the course
of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or
amount of surface runoff in a m3nner which would result
in flooding on- or off-site?
e) Create or contribute runoffwater which would exceed
the capacity of existing or planned storm'water drainage
systems or provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff'?
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality?
CITY IR VPUB/20002000/546265
7
Potentially
Significant
Impact
File No: CUP 00-013
Less Than
Significant
With Less Than
Mitigation Significanl No impact
Incol]lOrated Impact
x
x
x
x
-
x
x
x
FORM "]"
.
.
.
Issues:
g) Place housing within a I OO-year flood hazard area as
mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood
Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation
map?
i) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures
which would irnpede or redirect flood flows?
j) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of!oss,
injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as.a
result of the failure of a levee or dam?
~) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudfiow?
The proposed site alterations would not resnlt In any
of the above impacts.
IX. LAN)) USE AND PLANNING. Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community?
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or
regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project
(including, but not limited to the general plan,specific
plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted
for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an .
environmental effect?
I.
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan
or natural community conservation plan?
The proposed restaurant Is consistent with the general
plan and zoning designation for the area, and will
complement surrounding uses. The requested use
permit Is a permit process to establish specific
conditions for the consideration of allowing the
restaurant within the City of Arcadia. Such a permit
will not affect existing land uses or general plan
designations. The operation of the proposed business
will be subject to all other environmental plans 'or
pollcles.adopted by agencies with jnrlsdiction over this
area. There are no agricultural resources or
operations In the vlcluIty.
CITY/RVPUB/20002000/546265
8
Potentially
Significant
Impact
'-
File No: CUP 00-013
Less Than
Significant
With Less Than
Mitigation Signfficant No Impact
InCorporated Impact
-
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
FORM ''J''
.
.
.
Issues;
X.MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a \mown mineral
resource that would be of value to'the region and the
residents of the state?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important
mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local
general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
The proposed restaurant will be required to comply
with adopted energy conservatioll requirements. None
of the above impacts have been associated with the
proposed type of use. No mineral resources lire known
to exist at the site.
XI. NOISE. Would the project resultAn:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in
excess of standards es4blished in the local generalplan or
noise ordinance. or applicable standards of other
agencies?
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive'
groundborne vibration or groundbome noise l~vels?
c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise
levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without
the project?
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in
ambient noise. levels in the project vicinity above levels
existing without the project?
e) For a project located within an airport land uSe plan or,
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles
of a public airport or public use airport, would the project
expose people residing or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels?
CI11r/R\fPtnB/20002000/546265
9
Potentially
Significant
Impact
-
File No: CUP 00-013
Less Than
Significant
With Less Than
Mitigation Significant No Impact
Incol]lorated Impact
x
x
x
x
x
x
-
x
FORM "J"
~.
.
.
Issues:
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,
would the project expose people residing or working in
the project area to excessive noise levels?
The site of the proposed use Is In an existing
commercial building in a commercial area and none of
the above Impacts is associated with this location or
the proposed use. Should any problems arise however,
compliance with noise regnlations will prevent any
unreasonable noise levels.
xn. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the
project:
a) Induce substantia] population growth in an area, either
directly (for example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension
of road or other infrastructure)?
b) Displace substantial numbers' of existing housing,
necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating
the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
The proposed service is consistent with the general
plan and zoning designations for the area and will not
impact the population or housing.
>,
XIlI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project:
a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts
associated with the provision of new or physically altered
governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered
governmental facilities, the construction of which could
cause significant environmental impacts, in order to
maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other
performance objectives for any of the public services:
Fire protection?
Police protection?
ClTYf.R~lJB/20002000/546265
10
Potentially
Significant
Impact
File No: CUP 00-013
Less Than
Significant
With Less Than
Mitigation Significant No Impact
Incorporated Impact
x
x
x
-
x
x
-
x
FORM "]"
Issues:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
File No: CUP 00-013
Less Than
Significsnt
With Less Than
Mitigation Significant No Impact
Incol]lOrated Impact
.
Schools?
x
Parks?
x
Other public facilities?
x
The proposed use is consistent with the planned uses
for the area and will not resnlt in any ofthe above
impacts.
XIV. RECREATION. Wotild the project:
a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional - X
parks or other recreational facilities'such that substantia:!
physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be
accelerated?
b) Does the project include recreational faciiities or X
. require the construction or expansion of recreational
facilities which have an adverse physical effect on the
environment?
The proposed use will be located in an existing
commercial building, and the proposed project win not
result in any of the above impacts.
XV. TRANSPORTATION / TRAFFIC. Would the
project:
a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in - - X
relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the
street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either
the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio
on roads, or congestion at intersections)?
b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of X
service standard established by the county congestion
management agency for designated roads or highways?
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including X
either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location
that results in substantial safety risks?
.
CfI1{/R\rPlnB/20002000/546265 FORM "J"
11
-
.
.
Issues:
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature
(e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible. uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
e) Result in inadequate emergency access?
l) Result in inadequate parking capacity?
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs
supporting alternative transpo.rtation (e.g., bus turnouts,
bicycle racks)?
The proposed restaurant is located in,an eltistlng
building. The site complies with Oty's parking
requirements. The proposed project may be subjectto
mitigation measures should any traffic or parking
related impacts arise.
XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would
the project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the
applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?
b) Require or result in the construction of new water' or
wastewater treatment facilities or expansion qf existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental effects? I.
c) Require or result in the construction of new storm
water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities,
the construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the
project from existing entitlements and resources, or are
new or expanded"entitlements needed?
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment
provider which serves or may serve the project thatoit has
adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand
in addition to. the provider's existing commitments?
CITY /R VPUB/20002000/546265
12
Potentislly
Significant
Impact
-
File No: CUP 00-013
Less T;han
Significant
With Less Than
Mitigation Significant No Impact
Incol]lorated Impact
x
x
x
-
x
x
x
x
x
x
FORM"]"
.
.
.
Issues;
1) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted
capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste
disposal needs?
g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
It Is not anticipated that any of the above ntllities or
service systems will be significantly impacted.
Nevertheless, the proposed improvements will be
reviewed for, and the developer will be required to
provide, if necessary, any new systems or supplies
necessary to mitigate any such impacts.
XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF
SIGNIFICANCE
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the
quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat or a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten
to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the
number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant
or animal or eliminate important examples of the major
periods of California history or prehistory?
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("CUmulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in corlnection with
the effects of past projects, the effects of other current
project, and the effects of probable future projects;)
c) Does the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects on human
beings, either directly or indirectly?
The proposed use will be in an existing commercial
building, the proposed project will not resnlt in any of
the above impacts.
CrrY/RVPtnB/20002000/546265
13
Potentially
Significant
Impact
File No: CUP 00-013
Less Than
Significant
With Less Than
Mitigation Significant No Impact
Incol]lOrated Impact
x
x
x
.-
x
x
FORM "J"
'-,
Date Filed:
, .
FileNo. C\A~ Cf)-()0
CITY OF ARCADIA
240 WEST HUNTINGTON DRIVE
ARCADIA, CA 91007
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM
General Information
1.
~
N.
I1.w &, yA.d r-
( =I
2 tVD 9= Btylf/{::::{/(L(E/ ~I=:. 72.5/~
I Dj !o, ~:ij/Alh?-;;.v .'D? _' ...{',ec..... 7)/.4
Applicant's Name:
Address: 8D J
I
2. Property Address (Location):
Assessor's. Number:
3.
C:7-3 y /n?/H.-~ 2l""s hp.;r1 c J( A/'1>.i7;,/p,>", t2.ef= . (}.&-, 9r7S<'/
T' l)lp-, -,... ( ~ - ~ ( <<-I . - /
4. List and describe any other related pennits and other public approvals required for this project, including those
required by city, regional, state and federai agencies:
. C t Jp ,
5.
Zone Classificatioo:
6. General Plan Designation:
Proiect Descrintion
10.
7. Proposed use of site (project description):
I, ?~{$-rJt2A-..L 7.
8.
/
Site size:
9.
4 ~ b2-
I
Square footage per building:
Number of floors of construction:
II. Amount of off-street parking provided: h 1
12. Proposed scheduling of project: A:; p.. f' .
13. Anticipated incremental development: l-f'l'1
.4,
If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of
household sizes expected:
IS. If commercial, indicate the type, Le. neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and
e loading facilities, hours of operation:
,,/ f(b1'?:'''~~ r;l2raN IF-y /i7rv-:!.: (' ~1 1rME.r>- ""f" r; A ~Ik;f Clf"i2Z(WO'-I
All-'&- r[?tlM
1<> A:N/
Ie p1'1 .
16. Ifindustrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift; and loading.facilities:
17. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading
facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project:
18. If the project involves a variance, conditional uSe pennit or zoning application, state this and indicate clearly
why the application is required:
L _dr-;/ ~>-_l~t.-q
Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional
.eets as necessary).
21.
Change in pattern, scale or character of general area of project.
YES NO
0 C)I
0 ~
0 Q;
0 &r
0 rgI
0 (U
0 ri
0 Q/
0 oj
EJ.R.
04/12100
Page 2
19. Change in existing features of any hills, or substantial'alteratin of ground contours.
20. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads
"
22.
Significant amounts of solid waste or litter.
23.
Change indus!, ash, smoke, fumes. or odors in vicinity.
24.
Change in ground water quality Qr quantity, or alteration of existing drainage pattersn.
25.
Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity.
26.
Is site on filled land or on any slopes of 10 percent or more.
.7.
Use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammable
or explosives.
.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
..
Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)
Substantial increase in fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oi~ natural gas, etc.
Relationship to a larger project or series of projects.
Storm water system discharges from areas for materials storag~ vehicle or equipment
fueling, vehicle or equipment maintenance (including washing), waste handling, hazardous
materials handling or storage delivery or loading docks, or other outdoor work areas?
A significantly environmentally harmful increase in the flow rate or volume of storm water
runoff'?
A significantly environmentally harmful increase in erosion of the project site or surrounding
areas?
Storm water discharges that would significantly impair the beneficial uses of receiving waters
or areas that provide water quality benefits (e.g. riparian corridors, wetlands, etc.)?
Harm to the biological integrity of drainage'systems and water bodies?
Envir~nmental Settinl!
YES NO
[J cI
[J aI
[J d
[J a;
[J eJ/
[J dV
[J 01
[J dJI
36. Describe (on a separate sheet) the project site as it exists before the project, including information on
topography, soil stability, plants and ariimals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects, any existing structures
on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be
accepted. . I,
37. Describe (on a separate sheet) the surrounding properties, including information on plants, animals, any cultural,
historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of'land uses (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use
(one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set-
backs, rear yards, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted.
Certification
[ hereby certifY that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits resent the data and information required
for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, stemen ,and information presented are true and
correct to the best of knowledge and belief.
Date
.
Signa
E.I.R.
04112/00
Page 3