The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1593 RESOLUTION 1593 . A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 99-011 TO PROVIDE TWO DRIVE-UP ATM (AUTOMATIC TELLER MACHINE) KIOSKS WITH 24 HOURS SERVICE, 7 DAYS A WEEK ,ON A PROPERTY USED AS A OUTDOOR PARKING LOT FOR BANK OF AMERICA CUSTOMERS, LOCATED AT 201 N. SANTA ANITA AVENUE. WHEREAS, on May 18, 1999, a Conditional Use Pennit application was filed by Roy W. Herbold Jr. to provide two drive-up ATM kiosks on a property used as an outdoor parking lot for Bank of America customers, Development Services Department Case No. C.U.P. 99-011, at property commonly known as 201 N. Santa Anita Avenue, more particularly described in Exhibit "A". WHEREAS, A public hearing was held on July 13, 1999, at which time all interested persons were given full opportunity to. be heard and to present evidence; NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA HEREBY RESOL YES AS FOLLOWS: . SECTION 1. That the factual data submitted by the Development Services Department in th~ attached report is true and correct. SECTION 2. This Commission finds: 1. That the granting of such Conditional Use Permit will not be detrimental to the public health or welfare, or injurious to the property or improvements in such zone or vicinity. 2. That the use applied for at the location indicated is a proper use for which a Conditional Use Pennit is authorized. 3. That the site abuts streets and highways adequate in width and pavement type to carry the kind of traffic generated by the proposed use. 4. That the granting of such Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the comprehensive General Plan. 5. That the use applied for will not have a substantial adverse impact on the environment, and that based upon the record as a whole there is no evidence that the . . . . proposed project will have any potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. SECTION 3. That for the foregoing reasons this Commission grants a Conditional Use Permit to provide two drive-up ATM kiosks to a property used as an outdoor parking lot, upon the following conditions: I. Building Code compliance and conditions of approval must be met to the complete satisfaction of the Building Section. 2. Fire safety shall be provided to the complete satisfaction of the Fire Department. 3. Directional pavement markings guiding automobile drivers to the ATM kiosks shall be provided subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Division. 4. That C.U.P. 99-011 shall not take effect until the property owner and applicant have executed and filed the Acceptance Form that is available from the Development Services Department to indicate awareness and acceptance of the conditions of approval. S. Noncompliance with the provisions and conditions of this conditional use permit shall constitute grounds for its immediate suspension or revocation. SECTION 4. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and shall cause a copy to be fOIWarded to the City Council of the City of Arcadia. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the forgoing Resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on July 13, 1999, by the following vote: ATTEST: .~~, Secretary, anmng SSlOD City of Arcadia APPROVED AS TO FORM: J/J:!;;ijlci!1f!! . . ~ .. . Exhibit A LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF ARCADIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. STATE OF CALIFORNIA: THAT PORTION OF THE SANTA ANITA RANCHO, IN THE CITY OF ARCADIA, IN THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. AS SHOWN ON MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 1 PAGE 97 OF PATENTS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE WEST LINE OF SANTA ANITA AVENUE, AS SHOWN ON MAP OF TRACT 949, RECORDED IN BOOK 17. PAGE 13 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DISTANT THEREON SOUTH 01 DEGREES 03 MINUTES 43 SECONDS EAST 165.36 FEET FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 2 OF SAID TRACT NO. 949; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 53 MINUTES 42 SECONDS WEST 100 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 03 MINUTES 43 SECONDS EAST 184.49 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SANTA CLARA STREET, AS DESCRIBED IN THE CITY OF ARCADIA RESOLUTION NO. 3607, RECORDED ON AUGUST 9, 1963 IN BOOK 0-2140 PAGE 264, OFFICIAL RECORDS, AS INSTRUMENT NO. 5909, OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 77 DEGREES 29 MINUTES 49 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE 56.42 FEET AND NORTH 40 DEGREES 10 MINUTES 51 SECONDS EAST 67.78 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SANTA ANITA AVENUE; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 03 MINUTES 43 SECONDS WEST 120.30 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. July 13, 1999 STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Arcadia City Planning Commission Donna Butler, Community Development Administrator By: Kenneth Phung, Assistant Planner Conditional Use Permit No. CUP 99-011 to replace a walk-up automatic teller machine (ATM) kiDSk with two (2) drive-up ATM kiosks on an on- site parking lot for the Bank of America employees and customers at 201 N. Santa Anita Avenue. SUMMARY . This Conditional Use Permit application was submitted by Roy Herbold Jr. to replace the site's secondary walk.up automatic teller machine (ATM) kiosk with two (2) drive- up ATM kiosks at 201 N. Santa Anita Avenue. The site is used as a secondary parking lot for the Bank of America employees and customers. The Development Services Department is recommending approval of CUP 99-011 SUbject to the conditions in this staff report. . GENERAL INFORMATION APPLICANT: Roy Herbold Jr. (On behalf of property owner, Bank of America) LOCATION: 201 N. Santa Anita Avenue REQUEST: A Conditional Use Permit to provide two (2) drive-up ATM kiosks on the subject site. SITE AREA: Approx. 16,308 sq.ft. (.37 acres) FRONTAGES: Approximately 154 feet on N. Santa Anita Avenue, and 90 feet on Santa Clara Street. EXISTING LAND USE & ZONING: The site is zoned C-2, and is developed with a walk-up ATM kiosk with 25 on-site parking spaces. . . . . SURROUNDING LAND USES & ZONING: North: Manufacturing and Hospital: zoned CoM South: Retail, Church, Financial Institution and Offices: zoned C-2 East: Retail: zoned C-2 & H4 West: School Warehouse and Offices: zoned M-1 & C-2 PROPOSAL Drive-up ATM kiosks are permitted uses in the C-2 zone with an approved conditional use permit. The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to replace a walk-up ATM kiosk with two (2) drive-up ATM kiosks at 201 N. Santa Anita Avenue, as shown on the submitted site plan. The ATM kiosks will operate twenty-four (24) hours a day, 7 days a week. ANALYSIS Based upon the applicant's proposal and background information about the site, it is staffs opinion that the proposed ATM kiosks would be an appropriate use for the site. Staff believes that the replacement of an existing walk-up ATM kiosk with two drive- up ATM kiosks will not adversely impact the site, since it is used as a secondary parking lot for the Bank of America employees and customers. Currently, the site provides 25 parking spaces, which would be modified to 19 spaces to accommodate the new drive-up A TM kiosks. Engineering has reviewed the plan and has indicated there is adequate circulation on site, provided that the driveway on Santa Anita Avenue is widened, as shown on the submitted site plan. Currently, the driveway on Santa Clara Street allows for both ingress and egress access. The driveway has been modified per the Traffic Engineers recommendation to allow only ingress access. Additional interior landscaping planters are also provided, which will improve the aesthetics of the subject site. The applicant shall be required to comply with all code requirements as determined necessary by the Building Official, Fire Marshall, Maintenance Service Director and Development Services Director. CECA Pursuant to the provIsions of the California Environmental Quality Act, the Development Services Department has prepared an initial study for the proposed project. Said initial study did not disclose any substantial or potentially substantial adverse change in any of the physical conditions within the area affected by the project including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, ambient noise and objects of historical or aesthetic significance. When considering the record as a whole, there is CUP 99-011 July 13, 1999 Page 2 . . . no evidence that the proposed project will have any potential for adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Therefore, a Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project. RECOMMENDATION The Development Services Department recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit No. CUP 99-011 subject to the following conditions: 1. The drive-up ATM kiosks shall be maintained and operated in a manner that is consistent with the application and plans submitted and approved for CUP 99- 011. 2. Directional pavement markings guiding automobile drivers to the ATM kiosks shall be provided subject to review and approval of the Community Development Division. 3. All City code requirements regarding accessibility, fire protection, occupancy, and safety shall be complied with to the satisfaction of Building Services and the Fire Department. 4. Approval of CUP 99-011 shall not take effect until the property owner and applicant have executed and filed the Acceptance Form available from the Development Services Department to indicate acceptance of the conditions of approval. 5. All conditions of approval shall be complied with prior to completion Df the ATM kiosks. Noncompliance with the plans, provisions and conditions of CUP 99-011 shall be grounds for immediate suspension or revocation of any approvals for the A TM kiosks. FINDINGS AND MOTIONS Approval The Planning Commission should move to approve the Negative Declaration and adopt Resolution No. 1593: A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Arcadia, California, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 99-011 to replace a walk-up ATM kiosk with two (2) drive-up ATM kiosks. Denial If the Planning Commission intends to deny this Conditional Use Permit application, the Commission should move for denial and direct staff to prepare a resolution which incorporates the Commission's decision and specific findings. CUP 99-011 July 13, 1999 Page 3 . . . If any Planning Commissioner, or other interested party has any questions or comments regarding this matter prior to the July 13th public hearing, please contact Assistant Planner, Kenneth Phung at (626) 574-5447. Approved by: ~~) Community Development Administrator Attachments: Land Use and Zoning Map Plans Negative Declaration & Initial Study Resolution CUP 99-011 July 13,1999 Page 4 . . . ~ () ~ ARCADIA SCHOOL WAREHOUSE 1\ C -r 1 GI OF ... c; ..., OFFICE ...~ .~ , . ANIMAL HOSPTIAt MANUFACTURING .' ....\ STSJOSEPH ST 8 I L IAI MANUFACTURING I "' I~ PLUMBING SHOP I - I.. () ST '"" t! III III v - -. ltl REI, '" 100' ~ '" Ill~ - '"~ Z <( :i ')" ~ I: "8 , . .... - FINA!,-!CIAL INSTITUTION 110' (B of A) ~ ~'" Z ..: <( '" ,^ 145.2T ~) W5.$S LAND USE AND ZONING MAP t NORTH c;- .. .. " 9 Lj. 9 . M.5.17-13 ~LO" ... .. .. OFFICE ~~ ~~ 2 09 ~~O. ~ RESTAURANT . ~.~ ... '" <'I '- ";' 5.9'" "2,91.08 --- -T9T."oe - -~--r -100:00- I I Je oq J..t Ie.!:! I I , Cl ~CIl' ~O ~'" ) . ."'<. r-e (). ~\\ 9.9 ol!~\ ~'\ .. J ,"' o <'l . .. " 'C:i <:> '" '-- - Ct.\) \'10.4& z ~ ~ 100' (, - 'S 0 1.: 5\ ~ ,..2..14 ,4 . ." ci MIXED RETAIL ~ .. '" 201 N. Santa Anita Avenue CUP 99-011 Drive-up ATM Kiosks Scale: 1 inch = 100 feet . GENERAL NOTES: - . - +_.__._._--._._~._--_._._-__ +________....c._______._._+________-t_____________ ~;;:.""J.:fO..cI' ~..= _afYCllO'..-.lJT_ __OUI: __r......".urGoI1 -~. ___ ..n - ."Ml "M .... If ~-- tAse.IUDifT.OS I -~ ow ... ~ I,IQ,HT"-PQJ!UO 1otSf..uE1lET, SIe:l"M(r1'P:! ==: ; I - I .. .". ~ ~ III " '!I.I. I. o .... 0.... g~ ~~~~~~=~<<D FlIQl~TSEJtvlCUQlIfE(;fOR Gl'lAI.ImOlWlt.OCll.~U\OU.RtDGTllUC!tD flPNCAllIAcrvlT~CAAW:IoOI;Q.S.". ~~~=~'Io('.(POl~ 08T..IJ.lII'EJIW'CIt..u'm,~1N1II.Jl!UI:; =M:T~~iI:.:.~~ U~-I1n~ .. -, -- .". "\ .. \.. .. .-.. ~~j=~~~,. ~~~Q>fIEu.1'UImTJClol ~~~~cn aF~'$ITNCWlDl;IAA"'lIIN::l$ ~ShoIUCQrl>l.Ywm4l.L~ fUlEAAl..St..IltUiDLO:.\l.LAWS,~ TO<!! T__TOnE"QE,I.N""UOO~=-"A(;I'" ~,t.~~1~~~~ SANTA ANITA AVENUE . . """'" ING ..... '- SCALE 1~"10' ~- .' ~~~ ACPAYEDfoAEAS -, r ~, \-- -- ,\ ~,,,,,,SV . L-..c;~ ..__t....q '*"~E.lISt1NOe~.AlCT1!\.lPhOIll!l'IEOSlOEXIS11NG ~k~TOME'NPIIU.lSlIlCA'tUItlIUIIf..uP.."' ~i;o~~~'=~~~~OF "l.lU1llJ1l[S<<FNlf<<ltl<<s:srn;Nll!~ .ll'iOnu.FlEWm~l_Y ., w 5~ .... ~z _:5 1-0- O:w w.... >- ~i ~" ~t; 2~ _r 0:0 ~~ 0: $~I ow' <u~ ~~I <"". u. . ffi~~ ~~~ ~J:~ )C~~ ~~~ com;;; II II A-' ROY \/. tfRlOlD. .R. ARCHITECT al2AD\loO~m... ~Gl:ttl'1i rW!o"J.n;~ ...J EAST ElEVATION SC/IlLW'.r~ GUIII;_W~ -- _,_w_ - - , """"'-~ --~ i , t...-__ SOUTH ELEVATION -,:",'.r..- ATM KIOSK - ELEVATIONS ~.~ ~ S _~.!?Il~ ........-- a.7Y~~to) I'UIO.....,"~ ~ ~a;. ..- l ~-~ .-- ======:::1 w f1<laT_~__ --- .< fIOff.:-.-'ACtOlf TlQCQlOIe.eulI,,"" ~ape.r"E'''' - ~~CWIWlCF __OOo,.JoOtJ;. _l'OIOVIIlJl:IlI'f_OIf 1oII!IlIeA.__..t .......... .;:1 '....j:! t Wf\"Wi t.~ \ ~.J r~~ ~- ......VlEW ELEVAllON ENVELOPE DISPENSER DETAIL UI"_':'-o' CCUlIt_Qf~ -- ClX.CIl:...oo-.., ~- - "'~ ~~..... r__ -- -..- -- =- anaI.P'1.llC"'1JIlIo. ..m_ -- -- ~..- - WEST ELEVATION -..........r.cr all.OIIo_OI'-.o.. -- __<::1--.0. -- - _r_ -~ --- -- ~..~ n_ c NORTH ElEVATION CAlL_.'..... . "'::.:~:. ?':': :.r ':':1' ATM ....:.._.~. '.':r.f.~.'.' .......... 06 ATM'KIOSK FLOORiSITE PlAN =.~ . x ~ ~=:t;r= -~"'" .._~-..; -- r.r_-"~lI -~ .stm__~ ---,- .-- l"''''''~IIlIUS WIlllUal!_fIUft; lJIltCIUf_aMtl'l.llTRl -..... --~ - 01 -~- _~.CSl" ~_a_o f2"O.e.~"","" 02 x ~ f:C=- r__lJI'lZLl'OU! -..::Jt,,,,",_ ~.r_-.r.~ -- SlUI._-'1OUAllI -~.... -- \<O''''l<'_~ WCllllllllllr4UJlGflUtJ ~__""1UI -..... """""'-.. -- --- DCIDI-mW,.... ~_qllU. ITOe.._Woll '--'--' PARKING lOT UGHT STANDARD 04 SECURITY CAMERA STANDARD 05 __r.,. w.r-v t --- ~ I ! .. j l 1 r~ I -~- I r. .. _ "~TllI""o. JLI ~1l l ,,~. ~- . . 07 TYP!CAL PARKING STALL LAYOUT ~.- l 08 DIRECTIONAl ARRO\l\lS _'r.cr . 03 09 '" o ii: w .... 1;\., o=' ~~ Zo :5.. ..., ",Z .,0 Qfi ;a; ~Ld '" w $!zl ~~~ Ui!"~ ~<~ ~~l ffi;1.c :&:~;!: <91 \.I..J:-.c ou. "'Z~ ~~~ tDttl';;; il iI .... ",--.so -""........ .~. ....Ilf~...'... ~- - A-2 ROY"'. ffltlCllD. .R. ARCHITECT "'""....."" 'fUSf!NCIIoIiVU 1WS.~132& -:;]' .~ ~"Z- ~~. ~- -;;t - _"Z- ='~ .!!'!!!!!' . .- ....--- ... .-- . -- _.- ,.- ~ ==- . .- ~.- -.--..... ~ ::=- _.- ,.- ... .-.... - .--- -....--.-.. . .-- - . .- _.- _.- -.- ,.._- .. ...... - .......- ... '-."'- 0.....--. - .-",- --'-- ~ u.... _:0:0 ....... ~J .-"---- ._-""'~ ...... ~-............ " .- -- SANTA ANITA AVENUE . ~ ~. ." .'. ... ... IO'!-----.--.--BASIS OF BEARING --_.~==::-:- -~ lur ~q~.. ~u ~.. ... ~ . . ,.. .. - --_:_.(j;f.:}.- --- ./ "ljOng'i21;.-'" --- ~- - -- '.. ~ .. .. _1___ -- --~ or~ llLlT1C -- -- .u. .,,~ _c_ __. ~.~~. - - .. -. .. '.. =-~;'..: ,- - "\ \ . \ I...: '.. '.. .' i ... ... '.. \ '.. i ..... '\ \ \ \ . . i = ! \.. I .- i ',. '.. ... '.n '.. .. '.n ~ I " i "\ ~ 'n '.. m I . <P ... :; \.. ~ m -.. 1/;-... oW 0 ." G>- ... '. ... .. .. ~'" I .... Of .... ... .- .- - ..c.; . .- = ~- w, ..... --- .... ~X,~,.\ 5 ,,.; . ~ . '!\ e, ~ \ .. 'll> ... SCALE ,....,0' BASIS Of' RAAIHGS" BEHCH IoWtl(: at'r4l"_.oltolZit' MSLCHIOR lAND SURVEVlNG._tNC ",.._..____>IUOU'rC _"""~f__..~_........aM,o '1~ ,...~....._-....._QO n.l;OITl;ll.--.&r_~ PSI...,..,......... u..... ""'"Ol'___........-....... _"tII'.D --- I>UrI_OUOtcn.tI!..._1 CWI....no fIAA__ ....m Dott._ . >- W > a: :> '" o :;: a. ~ Cl o a. g w l- e;; '" $~I gW' ()U~ ~~I <3"1 ffi~. ~~i :)5:; >o:z! z~. ~CQ! II ii .... .:-... -...".... _1lt<:.0l0SI ,.,a........"" .....I<C"'EO -SS-1 ROY..,. 1fJIIlClD. Jl. ARCHITECT "".......... """""""" nU'SM.I:l21 . . . - -, . . .~___ .;....,_;.. .-. ___ --.-~. J. -'---.: ~ \..____, ~~. . _ '._' _ . .'.- :-___ - _ . .' Bank of America - - . '" - . - " .- Couvrelle@ Drive-Up (With Overhang) The slandard CouvrcUc@ urivc~up kiosk is paint. finished wilh a BA Illue sign band/canopy elcmcm and 1Ilighl neulral gray base. The canopy clemen! inclu~es a buih in. inl~mally illuminawd sign fuce. The sign band/canopy graphics arc npplic~ wilh vinyl ~ie-cuts an~ arc internally iIIuminaICd. The Bank of Amcrienlellering is while nnd (he llorA symhol i.< BA Re~_ The Vcrsalcller signature is noo- illuminated nnd is'applied with vinyl 'dic- culS in DA Blue. It is ccnlered over lhe ATM. The approach side of lIle A TM includes (be directional message "ATM" a_s well a~ vehic1e clearance iitformalion (clearance informalion,is hased on field conditions). These messages arc itppJil't1 with while vinyl die-CULl' am! tire non-illuminated. The (ull Bunk uf ^Ill~ricu signature is also added on lhe, hack of the drive-lip kiosk when visitlIc. I '~I '-J~l Bonk 01 Amerfca ~~Wl~~:;CG.:r.:":~'$'1:I'~ !i"i".r . -~. .' I. , , j,~ ," ~..:,- . '. )., _' -.,. I . . 1 .~~!~~.' ,. ~.,!' I .. :1',;'_:.\. ,,'- . , .,.~",' \: ,\";;:~:; -:(:'. '-~~,-;(;- ~,-' Back View. Scaling 50% of Front View ]'-0 ~ .. Side View Exhibit C o - --- ---- - 0--- .' '. .' . . 6'-2'3/4- __0 _ __ 0_ Plan View l~ "~1: ,~,i,'~:~~:i"..~::~~;.~~l~~:, .~: ~~I;!~~n~~l:i ,~~~~~. ~.: ~~{_'~;:~l~ '. ~,"~.~.;::'i,~~b;,h.','::' ')"\IB'88l:BIE!r~.'''','.>_=I"7' :'~ :..' ,:-,J ~;,';? ,':.;':"~;' l~, "._ .j~ttr:, "~~;,'I.: :'~~_,. "~I 'o'l.B'~'-""-~'. :'"'1;" '\!-.-:~':f '... :.... ' I_~:::~ 10'-511t6- , ~ :". " '1.'.1 I' 't-- -.'-: -.- I' ~''; '. f .. .; . " I I ,I Front View ~NK OF AMERICA - ARCADIA BRAN~ PROPOSED DRIVE-UP ATM STUDIES e ---- '\"- ,-,"', ~:- ~~~,~.~ ~~~':,:;.l- . Ai"'l;/"", ;.lll....:f~ _",:;:-"" ,- ..-,:">:c" View lookin r- , I !:--- ~-- 1;.,- <, View looking South from South-West corner of Lot. ROY W. HERBOLD JR., ARCHITECT o 2522 AQUASANTA. TUSTIN, CA 92782-1130 o 714.573.1328 . . . File No: CUP 99-01 I CITY OF ARCADIA 240 WEST HUNTINGTON DRIVE ARCADIA. CA 91007 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT NEGATIVE DECLARATION A. Title and Description of Project: Conditional Use Permit No. 99-011: A Conditional Use Permit to provide two (2) drive-up ATM (Automatic Teller Machine) kiosks on a property used as a outdoor parking lot for Bank of American customers. B. Location of Project: 201 N.. Santa Anita Avenue, City of Arcadia, County of Los Angeles C. Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Applicant: Roy Herbold Jr. 600 Wilshire, 2nd Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017 D. Finding: This project will have no significant effect upon the environment within the meaning of the Califomia Environmental Quality Act of 1970 for the reasons set fortb in the attached Initial study. E. Mitigation measures, if any, included in the project to avoid potentially significant effects: None Date: June 17, 1999 Date Posted: June 17, 1999 BY:~~ Kenneth Ph . ant Planner . . . CITY OF ARCADIA 240 WEST lIUN1WGTON DRIVE ARCADIA, CA 91007 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 1. Project Title: Conditional Use Permit No. 99-011 2. Project Address: 201 N. Santa Anita Avenue Arcadia, CA 91006 3. Project Sponsor's Name, Address & Telephone Number: Applicant: Roy Herbold Jr. 600 Wilshire, 2nd Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017 Contact: Broke Wolford 600 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 200 Los Angeles, CA 90017 (213) 228-2991 4. Lead Agency Name & Address: City of Arcadia - Development Services Department Community Development Division - Planning Services 240 W. Huntington Drive P.O. Box 60021 Arcadia, CA 91066-6021 5. Contact Person & Telephone Number: Kenneth Phung, Assistant Planner (626) 574-5447 6. General Plan Designation: Commercial -1- File No.: CUP 99-011 CEQA Checklist 6/99 File No.' CUP 99-011 7. Zoning Classification: . C-2 General Commercial 8. Description of Project: (Descnoe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the project and any secondary, support, or off-site features necessary for its implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) A Conditional Use Permit to provide two drive-up ATM kiosks located on a property used as an outdoor parking lot for Bank of America customers. The site currently has one walk up ATM kiosks. 9. Other public agencies whose approval is required: (e.g., pennits, financing, .development or participation agreements) The City Building Services, Engineering.Division & Fire Prevention Bureau must review and approve the tenant improvement plans for the center, and any other on-site or off-site improvements at the existing shopping center. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. . [ ] Land Use & Planning [ ] Population & Housing [ ] Geological Problems [ ] Water [ ] Air Quality [ ] Transportation / Circulation [ ] Biological Resources [ ] Energy and Mineral Resources DETERMINATION (To be completed by the Lead Agency) . [ ] Hazards [ ] Noise [ ] Public Services [ ] Utilities and Service Systems [ ] Aesthetics [ ] Cultural Resources [ ] Resources [ ] Mandatory Finding of Significance -2- CEQA Checklist 6/99 . . . File No.: CUP 99-011 On the basis of this initial evaluation: [X] I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. [ ] I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a ~gnificant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. [ ] I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. [ ] I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, but that at least one effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier docwnent pursuant to applicable legal standards and has been addressed by mitigation measures based on that earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, and if any remaining effect is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated," an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it only needs to analyze the effects that have not yet been addressed. [ ] I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects have been analyzed adequately in an earlier Environmental Impact Report pursuant to applicable standards and have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. 'S~ ::z June 16,1999 Date Kenneth K. Phung Print Name City of Arcadia For -3- CEQA Checklist 6/99 File No.: CUP 99-011 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: . 1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects such as the one involved (e.g., the project is not within a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). 2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction related as well as operational impacts. 3. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more, "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an Enviroumentallmpact Report is required. 4. "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures bas reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section 17 "Earlier Analyses" may be cross-referenced). . 5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program Enviroumental Impact Report, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration {Section l5063(c)(3)(D)}. Earlier analyses are discussed in Section 17 at the end of the checklist. 6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist, references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources, uses or individuals contacted should be cited in the. discussion. 8. The analysis of each issue should identify: a) The significant criteria or threshold used to evaluate each question; and b) The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the. impact to less than significant. . -4- CEQA Checklist 6/99 . . . File No.: CUP 99-011 Would the proposalresult in potential impacts involving: PotentialIy Significant Impact PotentialIy Significant Unless Mitigation IncolJlOrated No Impact Less Than Significant Impact 1. LAND USE AND PLANNING - Would the proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designations or zoning? [ ] [ ] [ ] [XI b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies wi.th jurisdiction over the project? [ ] [ ] [ ] [X] c) Be compatible with existing land uscs in the vicinity? [ I [ ] [ ] [XI d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g., impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)? [ I [ I [ ] [X] e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an estab1ished community (including a low-income or minority community)? [ ] [ ] [ ] [X] The two proposed ATM (Automatic TelIer Machine) kiosks tocated on a property used as an outdoor parking lot are consistent wtth the general plan and zoning designations for the area, subject to an approved Conditional Use Permit. The requested condiUonal use permit is a permit process to establish specific conditlons for the consideration of allowtng the two proposed ATM kiosks within the City of Arcadia. Such a permit will not affed e:rlsting'land uses or general plan designations. The operatioo of the two proposed A TM kiosks will be subjed to all other environmentat ptans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over this area. There are no agricultural resources or operations in the vicinity. 2. POPULATION AND HOUSING - Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? [ ] [ I [ I [XI b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? [ ] [ I [ ] [X] c) Displace existing housing, especialIy affordable housing? [ ] [ I [ I [X] The requested conditional use permit is a permit process to establish specific conditions for the consideration of allowing the two drive-up A TM kiosks on a property used as a outdoor parking lot within the City of Arcadia. Sucb a permit does not affect existing populations or bouslng. 3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS - Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: CEQA Checklist 6199 . . . Would the proposal result in potential impacts in"olving: Potentially Significant Impact a) Fault rupture? b) Seismic grllund sbaking? [ ] [ I c) Seismic ground failure, including Iiquefactiol1? [ ] [ ] d) Landslides or mudflows? e) Erosion changes in topography or unstable .soil conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? [ ] [ ] [ ] [ I f) Subsidence of the land? g) Expansive soils? b) Unique geologic or physical features? File No.: CUP 99-011 Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated [ I [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ I Less Than Significant Impact [ ] [ ] [ I [ ] [ ] [ I [ I [ I No Impact [Xl [X] [X] [Xl [X] [X] [X] [X] Wblle this entire region is subject to the effects of seismic activity, the subject location has not been determined to be especially susceptible to any of the above geologie problems. 4. WATER - Would the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? I I b) Exposure of people or properly to water related hazards such as flooding? [ I c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g., temperature. dissolved oxygen, or turbidity)? [ ] d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? [ ] e) Changes in currents. or the course or direction of water movements? [ I f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either tlu"ough direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of any aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of ground water recharge capability? g) Altered direction or rate of flow of ground water? [ I [ I [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ I [ I [ ] [ I [ ] [ I [ ] CEQA Checklist 6/99 [X] [Xl [X] [X] [Xl [X] [XI . . . Would the proposal result in potential impacts involvil1g: Potentially Significant Impact h) Impacts to ground water quality? [ ] i) Substantial reduction in the amount of ground water otherwise available for public water supplies? [ I Tbe proposed site lll!erlltions would not resutt in any of the above Impllcts. S. AIR QUALITY - Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standud or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? I] [ I b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? c) Alter air movement, moisture, or tempemture or cause any cbange in climate? [ ] [ ] d) Create objectionable odors? File No.: CUP 99-011 Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated [ ] [ I [ I [ I [ ] [ ] Less Than Significant Impact [ ] [ ] [ j [ ] [ ] [ ] No Impact [X] [X] [X] [X] [X] [X] Tbe two proposed drive-up ATM kiosks and It. operation will be subject to local air quality regulations as administered by tbe South Coast Air QUllllty Management District whicb sboutd prevent any impacts retlltive to Items (0) and/or (b) above. Tbere are no exterior improvements proposed that would result in alterations to air movement, moisture or temperature, or cause a change In climate. No objectionable odors have been associated with the proposed use. 6. TRANSPORTATION I CIRCULATION - Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? [ I b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., sbllrp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompal1ble uses (e.g., farm equipment)? [ I c) Inadequate emergency accesses or accesS to nearby uses? [ ] d) Insufficient puking capacity on-site or off-site? [ ] c) Hazards or barriers for pcdestrians or bicyclists? [ I t) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? [ I [ I [ I [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [Xl [Xl [ ] [ 1 [Xl [ 1 CEQA Checklist 6/99 [ I [ 1 [Xl [Xl [ 1 [Xl File No.: CUP 99-011 . Would the proposal result in potential impacts involving: Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? I I [ ] [ I [X] The two proposed drive-up ATM kiosks would be loeated in an existing outdoor parking 10L The site has ample parking available for the proposed use and no signifieant impacts have been identified. The proposed project may be subject to mitigation measures should any traffic or parking related impacts arise. 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES - Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats (including but not limited to plants, fisb, insects, animals and birds)? [ ] [ I [ I [XI b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees)? [ I [ ] [ ] [X] c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? [ ] [ ] [ ] [Xl d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh,.riparian and vernal pool)? [ ] [ ] [ ] [X] e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? [ ] [ ] [ ] [X] . The two proposed drive-up ATM kiosks are tocated on property used as outdoor parking toL None of the above circumstances exlsL 8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES - Would the proposal: a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? [ ] [ I [ ] [Xl b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner? [ I [ I [ I [X] c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? [ ] [ I [ ] [X] The proposed project wW be required to compty with adopted energy conservation requirements. None of the above impacts have been associated with the proposed type of use. 9. HAZARDS - Would the proposal involve:. a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? [ I [ ] [ ] [X] . CEQA Checklist 6/99 File No.: CUP 99-011 . Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Would the proposal result in potential impacts involving: b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? [ ] [ ] c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? [ I [ I d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? [ ] [ I e) Increased fife hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass or trees? [ I [ ] Less Than Significant Impact No Impact [ I [X] [ ] [X] [ ] [X] [ ] [X] The City BuDding Services and the City Fire Department wUl review the plans for the two proposed drive- up A TM kiosks located on a property ilsedas a outdoor parking tot to prevent any of the above impacts. No existing sources of potential health hazards have been Identified at thuubjecl property. 10. NOISE - Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? [ I [ ] [ I [ ] b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? . [Xl [ ] [ I [X] The two proposed drive-up A TM kiosks are located on a property used as outdoor parking. No noise Impacts have been associated with sucb use. Should any probtelDS arise however, compliance witb noise regulations will prevent any unreasonable noise levels. 11. PUBLIC SERVICES - Would the proposal have an effect'upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? [ I [ I [ ] [X] b) Police protection? [ ] [ ] [ I [Xl c) Schools? [ I [ I [ ] [Xl d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? [ I [ ] [ I [XI e) Other governmental services? [ I [ I [ I [Xl The two proposed drive-up ATM kiosks are consistent wltb the planned uses for the subject area and will not result In any of tbe above Impacts. 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS - Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or nattrral gas? [ ] [ ] [ ] [X] . b) Communications systems? [ ] [ ] [ I [X] CEQA Checklist 6/99 File No.: CUP 99-011 . Would the proposal result in potential impacts involving: Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact c) Local or regional walcr treatment or distribution facilities? d) Sewer or septic tanks? e) Storm water drainage? f) Solid waste disposal? g) Local or, regional water supplies? [ ] [ I [ ] [X] [ ] [ ] [ I [X] [ I [ I [ I [X] [ I [ I [ I [X] [ ] [ ] [ ] [X] Its is not anticipated that any of the above utilities or service systems wiD be significantly impacted. Neverthetess, the proposed improvements will be reviewed for, and the developer will be required to provide, If necessary, any new systems or supplies necessary to mitigate any such Impacts. 13. AESTHETICS - Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? [ ] [ I [ 1 [X] b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetics effcct? [ 1 [ 1 [ 1 [Xl . c) Create light or glare? [ I [ ] [ ] [Xl Tbe proposed project is tocated on a property used as outdoor parkIng lot and will be required to comply with local architectural standards and illumination limits and will not result in any of the above impacts. 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES - Would the proposal: a) Disturb paleontological resources? [ I [ ] [ I [X] b) Disturb archaeological resources? [ I [ ] [ ] [Xl c) Affect historical resources? [ ] [ ] [ ] [X] d) Have the potential to cause a physical change, which would affect unique ethnic cultuial values? [ ] [ I [ ] [X] e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? [ ] [ ] [ I [X] The tocatlon is an outdoor parkIng lot. None of the above resources have been identified at the subject area, and none of the Impacts have been associated with the proposed use. 15. RECREATION - Would the proposal: . CEQA Checklist 6/99 . . . Would the proposal result in potential impacts involving: Potentially Significant Impact a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? [ 1 [ 1 b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? File No.: CUP 99-011 Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated [ I [ 1 Less Than Significant Impact [ I [ 1 No Impact [Xl [Xl The location is on an outdoor parking tot, and the proposed project wiJl not resutt in any of the above impacts. 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the ,number or restrict the range of'a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? [ ] b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-tenn, to the disadvantage of long-tenn, environmental goals? [ 1 c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of paSt projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future project.) [ I d) Does the project have environmental effects, which will cause substantial adver$e effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? [ ] The subject property Is,an outdoor parking lot and wiJI not result In any of the above impacts. [ 1 17. EARLffiRANALYSES No additional documents were referenced pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA processes to analyze any noted effect(s) resulting from the proposal. [ ] [ I [ 1 [ 1 [ ] [ ] [ I CEQA Checklist 6/99 [X] [Xl [X] [Xl FileNo. Cu.P 0q-OIl CITY OF ARCADIA 240 WEST HUNTINGTON DRIVE ARCADIA, CA 91007 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM r:; /1'1 I qVJ / I General Information 1. Applicant's Name:--16A N t< cf 4~ CA Address: (b DO WI L5H (fZ-E- (bL- V D ') 1.. ~O F L f2.. ' 2. Property Address (Location): '21 0 N. SA. NT 6 A f'...) 'TA Date Filed: . L..,A I 900lT Assessor's Number: 3. Name, address d tele hone num er of person to be contacted concerning this project: W, - aLP, Ec ~'2. ~5A~T&, T STi~ -LA 9'L18Z-/I'bO ~ ST~. I ~"2.t7 List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: 4. ~()ILOIt--J; ~W\IT 5. Zone Classification: C-';L 6. General Plan Designation: Proiect Description 8. 9. 10. .1. 12. 13. 7. Proposed use of site (project description): Site size: or,u . u \ 00)(. e4- 20 S.f. l?AC tJ I - Square footage per building: Number of floors of construction: Amount of off-street parking provided: ~ 9 Proposed scheduling of project: 50MMl2:f2... 9-9 Anticipated incremental development: ND - C()el) ~~ oV)~ 14. . 15. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household sizes expected: ~.a, If commercial, indicate the type, i.e. neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading facilities, hours of operation: Cm'\N\<D('Cj J 16. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employ ent per shift, and loading facilities: n;a. 17. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project: 18. . _f\ .a. , If the project involves a variance, conditional use permit or zoning application, state this and indicate clear~ Wh~On,is required: 14 rl.?p - on 1Oes- c.. . Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. . YES NO Change in existing features of any hills, or substantial alteratin of ground contours. o ~ Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads. o ~ Change in pattern, scale or character of general area of project. o Cr o &' o .'8r Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. E.I.R. 3/95 -2- .4. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. . YES NO Change in ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. o 0.<< Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels inthe vicinity. o ~ o ~ o ~ Is site on filled land or on any slopes of 10 percent or more. Use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammable or explosives. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.). o ~ Substantial increase in fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). o b! Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. o ~ Environmental Setting .1. 32. . Describe (on a separate sheet) the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals; any cultural, historical or scenic aspects, any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. Describe (on a separate sheet) the surrounding properties, including information on plants, animals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land uses (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set-backs, rear yards, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. Certification i E.I.R. 3/95 c3- &K OIF AMERICA = ARCAIOIA BRANC'- PROPOSED !DRIVE-UP ATM STUIOIES . f"t >', .b:I , , " ,(. U::>/..-\ "';s ," eo, t>> .r", r... .~ ,!C!. . t: ~ .... ". ~ .\ '-" :..\....-, """t:..-" .;:.~("' 'b;,~ At " '. ,\lr""'~'Y ~.t.. 1.?,^ - ',- ~]1/" ~},,~~ 7i tt, 0 \1;;'" '. ':'?Ji~,'o: r-' ;,' -~::r.1,:J: . ~ . ' , ,'0', .~~ ,~~,~ ..;., ,I:.~,'" ~~a'6 ~:~:.:~ "--'~i'b,-;,~~~, 'QGf7 ,,~~..t.,'~"i~i ~ ' 0 ~., --:h - -..,. - - - Q {2[j[l~,--..J'_ ~~rt .=- - -----------.. '-----' - ',"" 'Lt..., ., _cp"i.ii:;-"':,' , _. -" ",' .;' " '... (?-r-Ji.;..~~-.__..te -- """T.-__ . . ~ ~ View lookin North from North-West comer of Lot. (/' .- --- .... -_.9" . . \" ". , c .. ~ - "'-it 'f&) . , ,~~ ~g ~ .. - ..:.:. "'-- 0.--= ~ o _~ -"", -~. ,"", - ~ . , "~y-~ -'" ~- - .- ". - ,. -- ,~.-==.---- _--,- , 0'_. ';> , ~-,""",:': .:::: ~~~",,~'I~' - J~~;"~.~..:ie-_.:...I.. .:;-tt_.~ -~~' ~ :~ r "~~~. ""'iF ~ View looking South from South-West comer of Lot. ROY lftI. HERBOLD JR., ARCHITECT 0 2622 AQUASANTA, TUSTIN, CA 92782-1130 0 714.&73.1328 I ! I ~ . ~<1il &m.2J.&t:.J " ~. Exhibit C Couvretle@ Drive-Up (With Overhang) The standard Couvrcuc@ drive-up kiosk is paint finished with a BA Blue sign band/canopy element and a light neutral gray hase. The canopy elemenl indodes a built in, internally illuminated sign face. The Vcrsalcllcr signature is 000- i1luminalCd and is applied with vinyl die- cuts in BA Bluc. It is centered over the ATM. _D u -oIL 6'.2 3W .. .. ,. 0 low '- -0 The sign band/canopy graphics are applied with vinyl dic~cuts and arc internally illuminated. The flank of America leuering is while and the BorA symhol is BA Red, n" "~ Plan V The approach side of Lhc ATM includes the din.."Clional message "^TM" as well a.~ vehicle clearance information (clearance information is based on field conditions). These messages arc applied with white vinyl die-culs and arc non-illuminated. Back View-Scaling 50% of Fronl View The full Bank of America signaLurc is also added on the back of the drive-up kiosk when visible. &W'il 'liII...,.....,..~ ..Et \ ' . 0illf301~. I' I 1- _ ___--l 3'.O~ ~~ '~., I' "="',' :, -- I lit.. : L: ID'.15 1116~ Sida View Front View -------------~-----------------------~------------- ~ g 02._ REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE VVHEElCHAlR RAMP AND CONSTRUCT NEW ADA APPROVED .".."...eElCHAIR RAMP PER THE CITY OF ARCADIA STANDARDS WDEN CONCRETE SIOEVWW<' AT THE CURS RETURN AREA AROUNQ THE TRAFfIC SIGNAl POLE. REMOVE AND REPLACE OEFlClENT. DAMAGED gr~~~A~~ANo;oR PAVEMENT lOTHE SATISFACTION OF' THE CITY ENGINEER. CONTACT THE CITY INSPECTOR FOR EXACT lOCATIONS OF REMOVAl AND REPLACEMENT 11WF1O .""" AlL NEW CONCRETE CURBS ON SITE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED II'" ABOVE- EXISTING "c, PAVING 111.13 '1.53'1. -93.17 '.." SCALE 1"=10' ~- INSTAlL "00 NOT ENTER" SIGNS ON ~CH SlOE OF DRIVE ON 2" SQ, STEEL TUBES WI C:oNe. BASE PAINTeD 21" TALL 1.ETTERS ON PAVEMENT ORI\IEWAY '"" "- r \~N .SEe . r ...{; TElEPHONE "'"' '5, AND SURVEY ,IN PLACE OR COROANCE'MTH :T" PRIOR TO \I uF THE ISIBlllTY OF MlITEE"S MODIFY EXISTING ElECTRiCAl AND"rElEPHONE FEEDS TO EXISTING MASONRY A1M BUILDING TO NEWPREFABRtcATEO ORIVE-UP ATM KIOSKS AS REQUIRE:O. PROVIDE AND INSTALL ALl SITE SlGNAGE AS REQUIRED BY BANK OF AMERICA STANOARbS. CONTACT CAREY SIGNS (714)630-8414 :RGRQUND, ~ I I , . . I CIl W Zl- :5~ ex: W Cl..o!l, I-~ ~~ ~Zl> , OW~ 'I <tl I-Cl.. tl::!::i O::w ex:1-~ III WI- ~<~ >- OCll <Cl.. _ Z..... O=?~ <~ -W~ ffi~", .....~ 11::< i51- ~O~ Ztl ':1 O~ ~~i N- -J: :.::Z ex:() Z~ . o ex: < ~ J:< IDID.. a al I II ..a. B01.Q9B.54 _ R'Mi JR CIMW RWH JR ~ft 05 APRll199i - NOTED ~ A-1 ROY..". J.fRla.D. .R. ARCHITECT 2522 AQUASANTA TUSTIN, CA 92782 714/573-1328 _10-_ SANTA ANITA AVENUE RECONSTRUCT DRIVEWAY TO INCREASE 'MOTH FROM 2Z'~ TO 2G'-()" PER CITY Of ARCADIA, STANDARD DR.IVEWAY PLAN, SHEET~'1 c TRAFFIC SIGN.-r- . PLU BOX M.63 DRIVEWAY 'PROPOSED KIOSK ~ ~ 'IN.?e UGHT POLE AND BASe. see oa. ~ SHeET A.2 (TYP.) EXISTING BUILOlNG ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ 8 z 'M.1l7 'a.&.ao "421 (') ~ , , .... ~ m :;; I 0> "'u. ,,,. , 0>0 2.01' I- U~ ~<C I-Q. s 2>.0- '\ A< "-- SEE AlLA GENERAL NOTES: NO PORTIONS OF EXISTING GUTTER AND AC. PAVEMENT SHALL BE REMOVED UNLESS PRIOR APPROVAL IS OBTAINED FROM DEvaOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR. GRAVITY DRAINAGE OUTLETS SHAlL BE CONSTRUCTED PER ARCADIA CITY STANDARD DRA'MNG NO. S-11. PAlNT ADORESS NUMBERS ON CURB FACE PER ARCADIA CITY STANDARD DRAWING NO. S-24. OBTAIN PERMIT FOR All 'M:IRK PERFORMED IN PUBUC RIGHT ..oF.WAY. THE CITY INSPECTOR SHALL BE CONTACTED AT LEAST 24 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF OfF-SlTE IMPROVEMENTS. All CONSTRUCTION IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT -OF.WAY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WTH All APPLICABLE SECTIONS AND/OR PROVISIONS OF THE LATESl EDITION OF THE "STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR PUBLIC \-\ORKS CONSTRUCTION" (GREENBOOK) AND THE CITY OF ARCADIA'S STANDARD DRA1NlNGS. CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WTH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL. STATE, AND LOCAL LAVVS, AND REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO THE "CLEAN AIR AND CLEAN WATER ACT" AND NATIONAL POLlUNTANT DISCHARGE ElIMINATtON SYSTEM (NPDES) BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPs). - -93.15 " PLANTER OF ICATE Pl , RK BY.S, ING -94.13 . "... ,..0- <.." MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 2% SLOPE IN AU A.C;PAVEOAREAS CURB ! NO"OOtl2"B18UIl All SURVEY MONUMENTS CENTERUNE Tll REFERENCE POINTS SHAll BE PROTECTE.~ RE-ESTABllSHEO 'M-lERE DISTURBED IN A~ SECTION 8771 OF THE lAND SURVEYORS A ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF: COMPLETTO PROJECT, THIS WORK WIll BE THE RESPOI THE PERMITTEE AND SHAlL. BE AT THE PE~ EXPENSE. : AU UTILITIES SER\IING,THIS SITE ARE UNO ANO VvlLL REMAIN THAT WAY, '